Shit proposition since you asked for a new licence without knowing if they're being properly used in AI stuff.
Good intentions though, maybe do elaborate on some proper argument for it and they will get into it. You do have to think on current foss licenses' limitations in regards to AI.
for now this is the response im planning on sending
==
Hello, thanks for response.
I believe a new license is needed because of the terms and definitions used in the existing licenses are possibly unapplicable for ML models, hence people could be reluctant to use existing GNU/FSF licenses.
Thank you for all the work in the Free Software Community!
==
>because of the terms and definitions used in the existing licenses are possibly unapplicable for ML models >possibly unapplicable
Are they or not? The FSF licensing administrator clearly seems to think that they're applicable, so you should point out which particular terms you think aren't applicable and why they aren't. Otherwise you're just making up nonsense and wasting people's time.
You should shill the benefits of having many millions of coders all over the world to look at the training and coding of the AI's, allowing the field of AI and LLM's to progress as a faster speed then if it was not.
However, I will admit I am confused about your initial email. >I am writing to inform You that a free license for AI models is needed.
They responded with >We would be happy to hear from you on how you think a NEW free software license could help
So you need to address that, why do they need a NEW software license Anon?
for now this is the response im planning on sending
==
Hello, thanks for response.
I believe a new license is needed because of the terms and definitions used in the existing licenses are possibly unapplicable for ML models, hence people could be reluctant to use existing GNU/FSF licenses.
Thank you for all the work in the Free Software Community!
==
Yes, because I was only replying to the OP and didn't read any other posts in the thread yet.
Seems like
for now this is the response im planning on sending
==
Hello, thanks for response.
I believe a new license is needed because of the terms and definitions used in the existing licenses are possibly unapplicable for ML models, hence people could be reluctant to use existing GNU/FSF licenses.
Thank you for all the work in the Free Software Community!
==
is missing a lot of context though. > because of the terms and definitions used in the existing licenses are possibly unapplicable for ML models
Examples about specific terms will need to be added, as well as reasoning why they fall short for AI.
> millions of coders > everyone is just using one or two commercial platforms
where are millions of coders, you fucking idiot? my sides. even the memeshit shills have no idea how any of this works. hilarious.
Don't, because you obviously don't know what you're talking about and are just wasting their time.
original email
Shit proposition since you asked for a new licence without knowing if they're being properly used in AI stuff.
Good intentions though, maybe do elaborate on some proper argument for it and they will get into it. You do have to think on current foss licenses' limitations in regards to AI.
for now this is the response im planning on sending
==
Hello, thanks for response.
I believe a new license is needed because of the terms and definitions used in the existing licenses are possibly unapplicable for ML models, hence people could be reluctant to use existing GNU/FSF licenses.
Thank you for all the work in the Free Software Community!
==
Do not send this ( ) meme post OP
You need more context on where it falls short
>because of the terms and definitions used in the existing licenses are possibly unapplicable for ML models
>possibly unapplicable
Are they or not? The FSF licensing administrator clearly seems to think that they're applicable, so you should point out which particular terms you think aren't applicable and why they aren't. Otherwise you're just making up nonsense and wasting people's time.
this entire thread has made the entire internet at least 20% more stupid.
i don't see the "conviction", all i see are compulsive lies and make believe fantasies vomited up by life's greatest computer illiterates.
You should shill the benefits of having many millions of coders all over the world to look at the training and coding of the AI's, allowing the field of AI and LLM's to progress as a faster speed then if it was not.
However, I will admit I am confused about your initial email.
>I am writing to inform You that a free license for AI models is needed.
They responded with
>We would be happy to hear from you on how you think a NEW free software license could help
So you need to address that, why do they need a NEW software license Anon?
because of the terms and definitions used in the existing licenses are possibly unapplicable for ML models
Did you just completely ignore
?
Yes, because I was only replying to the OP and didn't read any other posts in the thread yet.
Seems like
is missing a lot of context though.
> because of the terms and definitions used in the existing licenses are possibly unapplicable for ML models
Examples about specific terms will need to be added, as well as reasoning why they fall short for AI.
> millions of coders
> everyone is just using one or two commercial platforms
where are millions of coders, you fucking idiot? my sides. even the memeshit shills have no idea how any of this works. hilarious.
Speak bullshit with enough conviction and people will buy it. Even if it is false.
Oh hi!
Panos here, just reply in this thread and I'll be happy to hear your responses.
I believe it.
how you pronounce Alevropoulos?
How would you navigate model repositories implicitly licensing models with a terms and conditions agreement upon download?
GNU Intelligence General Public License
===
1. Terms
---
The present AI model may only be used in software licensed under the GNU LGPL, GPL or AGPL licenses.
The training data and output of the model may only be used to produced materials licensed under the licenses GNU FDL, CC-BY or CC-BY-SA.
2. Addendum
---
Traps are not gay.
The present license document shall be included in all distributions of the software and its derivatives.