Fundamentally, AI art is just about disrespecting artists.

Admit it. You have no respect for artists. Just cruelty.

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    okay and? they deserve it. ever think if u were better people then people wouldn't want to destroy u?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It threatens their livelihood and status symbol.

      Your jealousy is so obvious lol.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >That profile pic
        Clearly vexx doesn't have some magic trick for doing art good

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Normal people resent "artists" nowadays because they're annoying, have huge egos and are in the strata of society full of rich kids (art career because of daddy's bank job and connections), vacuous mentally ill drug users and addicts of all kinds.

        These were the same people celebrating the end of the blue collar class' last hold on economic stability when people assumed trucking and service jobs would be automated. They assumed that in the communist utopia they'd be at the top of the food chain with their transgressive diaper scat fetish pics and manifestos on non-binary ableism in Steven Universe. These people weren't making patents, saving lives, or even cleaning their rooms, they were feeding their ego and victim narratives while making things actively worse for others via their pollution of the discourse

        They dug their own grave and now have to live with the consequences. If they had formed a class consciousness that was actually built around class and non clique-ish elite school talking points and grievance culture then they'd have far more allies in this fight.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Normal people resent "artists" nowadays because they're annoying, have huge egos and are in the strata of society full of rich kids (art career because of daddy's bank job and connections), vacuous mentally ill drug users and addicts of all kinds.
          This is an absolute strawman

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            what do you expect? his post is filled with opinions that you can only get by browsing twitter for 16 hours/day and thinking it's an accurate depiction of real life.

            i hate it man. this site is filled with spiteful NEETs that browse shit that makes them angry all day and then come on here to shit and piss their pants about it

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Then browse facebook, instagram maybe tiktok.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >his post is filled with opinions that you can only get by browsing twitter for 16 hours/day and thinking it's an accurate depiction of real life.
              or by interacting with art college students for 15 minutes

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              most of us hate artists because we were fricking forced to deal with you buttholes. Similar to Black folk. I used to work at an art gallery because i was literally the only person that would show up not fricked up and actually run the shows. I went in with no frame of reference for art and artists and i left with absolute hatred for artists.

              They are scum that think everyone else is scum.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                And yet again, none of what you're doing is touching those artists you hate even one iota. You're either an idiot or a liar.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                ha good one. I went to a party once and a few art gays were arguing with regular people about ai art because the regular people were having fun and laughing and making cool and funny pics.

                They ran to me thinking i would back them up on their hate for AI art and i just laughed and laughed while roasting them. I stated that we dont need them anymore and that is all there is to it and they were not happy lol. They thought i would be on their side due to my experience with the art community but that is why i was not on their side.

                We don't need you anymore lol.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Degen artists hang out at clubs with rich kids that buy their art
            >This is an absolute strawman
            How is it a strawman? Who has the money to spend on the currently popular trashy avant-garde art except for bankers and noveau-riche gayMAN executives?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's not avant-garde artists who are complaining about AI.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Most of them making actual art are fine. Some of them who make digital art are insufferable but generally if they care about their work and improving it they're pretty pleasant people to be around. The ones making garbage and want everyone else to find it great are very annoying. Make something actually good and people will be impressed.

          > manifestos on non-binary ableism in Steven Universe

          These conspiracy theorists are currently academics in the woke west.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          You're talking about two different classes of artists here. Artists that just want to draw things they think are pretty/make them coom/are funny, and the pretentious conceptual artist types. The former by and large either doesn't care about or absolutely despise the latter, and for that matter are basically working stiffs like most of humanity who have to stay on the grind to make their bread. I mean, even the really successful social media "lowbrow" artists don't act anything like what you're describing. This strawman you're wailing on represents a vanishingly small class of homosexuals that no one but the other homosexuals in their circlejerk like, and they aren't even the type of people you're trying so hard to "punish" with your AI fartist garbage. If anything, YOU are exactly the kind of person that you claim to hate while antagonizing those who are the exact opposite of that. What kind of absolute moronation, or malignant dishonest bullshit, are you even on to say blatantly untrue things like this?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Unless you're literally an artist

            Maybe I made the wrong comparison when I made the joke about scat fetishes and Steven Universe. That was just a gripe with the leftist degeneracy.

            The main point I'm making is WHO gets to be artists nowadays. It's not the average person with a genuine desire to express themselves. There are the rare talents who rise through the ranks by merit and gain a good following on social media and portray a super nice vibe with no qualms whatsoever, but that's far more the exception

            Let's look at the tuitions of the largest art schools in the country
            Cal Arts: 53k
            RISD: 56k
            SAIC: 53k
            SCAD: 38k

            All of the entryways into being an "artist" are prohibitive to anyone outside of the top 20%, and even those in that strata, only the top x% of the top x% can maintain themselves long enough on no salary to get to the point of having a serious career. Very simply, it's a bunch of rich kids who have turned their sheltered cultural artifacts into a turf war about egos.

            And here's the thing. It's about ego, not money. If it were just about money AI art would be a huge boon to artists because they can take their current reputation and skill and magnify their output 100x using AI.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >This strawman you're wailing on represents a vanishingly small class of homosexuals that no one but the other homosexuals in their circlejerk like
            you are very good at sounding like exactly that kind of a homosexual, good job
            it's funny how almost every artist or their white knight temporarily joins that vanishingly small class of homosexuals to share their opinion on the objectively superior AI art, then immediately rejoins the innocent "I just want to draw pretty things and make my bread" class right after the "submit" button is pressed

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes there really are two breeds of artists, you have the commercial artists that work for a living for the man (usually seen on Artstation with portfolios) and you have the artsy homosexual starving artists who post on Twitter all day. I'd assume most wage slave artists don't really care about AI art and probably like the idea of saving time drawing Memphis-style McDonald's ads.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Some people might nitpick some generalizations here in your post, but there are some very deep seeds of truth here I think.
          Society went seriously off track the last ten years in particular. And I think this post kinda nails the overall absurdity of what has happened.
          But the big question is going to be what the frick is going to happen now...the next ten years are going to be incredibly weird.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        this
        ai Black folk (not devs, but users) are just commies, talentless as always, hating on both gifted and people that put in the effort.
        As you could see lately ai happened to be a field day for these commies

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think basically anyone is jealous of artists except people who want to be artists specifically themselves. They work all the fricking time to the point of wrecking their hands, make almost no money, get almost no respect outside of some people scoring internet points and have no upwards mobility unless they branch out and start a business, effectively requiring them to acquire another skill. A rare minority luck out and become very well known on Patreon/Youtube and break six figures but that isn't normal for anything but the .01%. Everyone else makes little to nothing after 10+ years of work and art is fricking flooded with people.
        You unironically might be better off, per hour, working at McDonalds rather than learning art.
        Make it a hobby unless you literally can't see yourself doing anything else.
        >but muh Twitter clique of homosexual leftists praising me
        >muh upvotes
        >muh followers
        >muh "fame"
        No one cares except people who are already deeply invested in that circle. This is like bragging about workplace politics.
        Artists as humans have a bad reputation because they're c**ts.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The amount work you put into doesn't determine value of the product. How much your client likes your product determines its value.
          If you plan on sustaining yourself of art, you better learn how to make art that people are willing to pay for enough to cover the expenses of the production. I'm not going to pay few hundreds of dollars for a sandwich just because the baker spends 4 hours everyday to sing to wheat fields that are going to become the bun one day, if I can get a mediocre 3$ sandwich from market on the street corner.

          You do not deserve reward for working, you deserve reward for producing something worthy the reward.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >never ever bothered to talk about people who shit on artists
        >suddenly feel threatened by AI and start shitting on the shitters
        >"heh actually its you who is seething"

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Like programmers, demanding 500k pa for writing a dozen lines of code per week. These people deserve nothing but contempt.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        what fricking currency is that?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Pakistani rupee

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Seething brainlet

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      But if someone can draw they ARE better than you. They devoted themselves to learning a skill while YOU didn't. It's not genetic. You could have learned art too. But you didn't, because you're lazy and of inferior mind.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >if someone devoted themselves to boomboxing, they ARE better than you, and people who are very good at fingerboarding DESERVE a LIVING WAGE

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Assuming you don't have any skills on par with that or better, yeah
          btw programming is harder than fingerboarding, but not drawing and arguably the most talented beatboxers

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            no, not all skills are created equal, and people who devoted themselves to boomboxing, or fingerboarding, or painting bottles, or writing poems, or programming for templeOS, or drawing furries, are fricked in the head if they expect to earn a living out of their skill

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >drawing furries, are fricked in the head if they expect to earn a living out of their skill
              i don't think you realize how wrong this last example is lmao

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've jerked off to state-of-the-art AI-generated furry porn, I know what I'm talking about, their days are numbered

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        So the machine learning bots are better than you, because they can make better and more valuable things than you can

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The machine did not do any hard work to learn a skill. It's simply meshing up the work of other people. Machines aren't human.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's what you're doing too, moron. You think because you made a unique looking style that you did something special? You can do that in SD too. You think it's a collage machine because that's the propaganda that you're ilk is spreading. You don't actually understand how any of it works because you're a moron.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >It's not genetic
        It is largely genetic. If someone is incapable of thinking in images, they are going to have a much harder time making art. That's like saying that anyone can be a professional baseball player if they work hard enough. They can't, because of genetics.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't believe in the whole "Some people can't imagine an apple in their mind" thing. Everyone can do that, they just interpret what they're thinking differently, leading to the confusion.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm a recreational pilot. I devoted myself to learning a skill that most people didn't.
        I have no problem with artists loading up MS Flight Sim and simulating my hobby, and I can't think of any other pilot that would.
        So why do artists get so buttmad when I load up SD and simulate their hobby?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The simulator didnt take away market shares of the flying business. It wasnt made infringing on peoples IP to replace the job it emulates, unlike image generators.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Simulators definitely have taken away from air-tourism/sightseeing, but no one cares because the amount of loss is barely a dent.
            Likewise, AI generated art is barely making a dent on the income of real artists.
            How does AI infringe on peoples IP? It's completely transformative.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >But if someone can draw they ARE better than you.
        No
        >They devoted themselves to learning a skill while YOU didn't.
        This is a strawman

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nobody who draws for a living is losing their job to AI or AI within 5 years or maybe forever
        People who "draw for a living" will lose their prospective "future" at "drawing" though

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It threatens their livelihood and status symbol.

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >People are happy that the smug buttholes that celebrated when blue collar jobs were replaced while trying to charge you 80$ for a 256x256 drawing are losing their job.
    I wonder why.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Give me 3 examples of that. You wont find them. I have literally never seen an artist celebrate blue collar workers getting displaced, because turns out most of them also work shit manual jobs because art doesnt pay.
      Where does this boogeyman originate from? Do you unironically believe that it its them who told people how to learn how to code and not well off redditors nd a handful of out of touch journos? Its /ic/gays who invade other boards yelling at people that they were about to lose their jobs now?
      Im genuinely curious.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        They think that programmers from across tthe world and the moronic silicon valley news article writers (Who are just paid to write an opinion piece they don't even really care about) are the same.
        Also people are just want to hate on others and shit. Conflict gives people a feeling of meaning. It's just console war mentalities.

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who the frick is this, and why the frick should I give a fricking frick?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      IT'S ONE OF THE FRICKING ARTISTS YOU'RE TRYING TO DESTROY YOU FRICKING IDIOT.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        FRICK YOU! NO FRICKING ARTIST IS BEING FRICKING DESTROYED BY ME FRICKING GENERATING FRICKING WAIFU!

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        And? You haven't answered the question of why I should give a frick what he has to say.

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care about leftists.

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reading between the lines what should be making artists have sleepless nights is the majority of people are actively cheering for their downfall.

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Admit it. You have no respect for artists. Just cruelty.
    yeah
    inkcels tried to take an easy path through life, why should I respect them? other artists, like musicians and poets, don't expect to earn a living through writing rhymes about anthro futas, they have real jobs, making music and writing poems for free, because they like to do it

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >making music and writing poems for free, because they like to do it
      hello commie

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >inkcels tried to take an easy path through life, why should I respect them?

      Anyone who doesn't try to take an easy path through life is a fricking moron. Did you let religion instill a Protestant Work Ethic in you in order to syphon off your Surplus Value without a fight?

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    i like some artist and feel bad for what is happening to them, but to those artist like OP pic i feel a inmensurable pleasure reading their rant.
    is about showing coders supremacy over everything else, i dream with the day doctors suffer the same fate.

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    In the time it took him to write that thousands of images were generated for the people he's angry at. The machine is only going to provide for those people and make them happy. All he's trying to do is stifle progress. Can you really call yourself an artist if all you want is to destroy instead of create? To prevent expressions?

    None of this matters anyway. No amount of whining can stop technological advancement.

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art may not be considered real art, but neither is digital art

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I easily admit it, and I regret absolutely nothing. My disrespect for all peoples of all kind (besides of course my esteemed Self) extends indeed to lowly artists.

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    don't care + Black person

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >You have no respect for artists
    true.
    don't give a shit about the AI part tho

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >frogposter
      >leftwing meme length post
      This is exactly what I mean. The shitters are obviously just happy to think they're finally creating things of value with absolutely no effort. It's what makes them seethe at artists for not having to play the slot machine to get something approaching acceptable.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous
    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >My AI companion
      Made me cringe so hard I broke a rib.

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not about the artists or cruelty, it's the shoveling garbage into human artist places that we actually use for finding art.
    >look, I fed words into a machine learning model, and it gave me some close enough garbage that barely satisfies my porn addled brain!
    I don't like phoneposters, and I don't want their lazy autocorrect on my art sites. And I don't like their attitudes, as if copying and pasting different lines of prompts until they get something their shit taste likes is any way comparable to having an image in your head and just drawing it. Black folk proud of google image search lol

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI people in general seem to be uneducated philistines. They don't care about science, art, or philosophy at all. They're just consumer drone moron NPCs
    Note that this doesn't apply to all of them it's just a strong general trend I've seen

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Note that this doesn't apply to all of them
      great preemptive defense here, Socrates, I was just about to point out that there definitely exist some AI people who are not uneducated philistines therefore you are completely wrong
      but you are completely wrong anyway, you don't need to "care" about art in some special elitist way to enjoy or appreciate it

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >philistines as an insult
      Quit being anti palestinian

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not "fundamentally" about that, but it is a nice plus for sure.

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, sorry artists but you can still do actual painting like oil painting or some abstract shit, aint no machine replacing that shit now is it? Digital painting would be automated eventually anyway

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    this phenomenon is called cope, and it's the only way they can justify their irrational hatred of AI or anybody who so much as looks at it. they have to imagine the AI user as a cruel, evil force that wants to kill them, so that it's ok to hate them back.

  20. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    ok I admit it, I have no respect for artists.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes
      YESSS
      He should learn to code

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Funny this was in dred decades ago.

      yes
      YESSS
      He should learn to code

      Code monkeys are gonna be out of jobs too...

  21. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >A livestream of my suicide would be the only art form AI can't fake
      Holy shit why does that go so hard?

  22. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do paintpigs really see themselves as a group of angels here? Since midjourney became publicly available there hasn't been a day to go by without a huge Twitter circlejerk disparaging people who like or create AI art

  23. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >You have no respect for artists.
    That's right. I have respect for people as individuals, not for groups without warrant.

  24. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe the hostility is coming from artgays trying to take away the aigays tools, and being hostile to them.

  25. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    No I just don't have any money

  26. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art will make art great again by removing capitalism from the equation.
    If you can't make money with your art, only then you are free to make real art freed from capitalist greed.
    Hypocrite lefty homosexuals, I thought that's what they want.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >removing capitalism from the equation.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Idk where people get this idea. Look at the work of starving artists from the past century, it all sucks ass. All great art was historically created by artists who survived off commissioned pieces ordered by monarchs or empires. Good art takes skill and developing those skills is a full time endeavor.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Computer parts cost money and ML researchers are working on bigger things with pretty pictures being a side effect. Money is still changing hands, it's just in a far different form than 400 years ago.
        You could definitely say art going from one commissioner with an idea keeping an artist on a tight leash (although not always, lots of old paintings have the artist's frick yous in them) to a product marketed to a general audience and beholden to shareholders caused some decline and you'd probably be right.

  27. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    don't care. going to prompt

  28. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Admit it. You have no respect for artists
    Yeah I don't think anyone was ever trying to hide that

  29. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >A trash bag thrown round a white room is art
    >Someone sitting in a room with a bucket on his head for 3 days is art.
    >U JUST DON'T GET IT!!!!!!!
    >They scream when you point out their emperors new clothes
    >But AI art is not art?

  30. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Artists do not deserve respect, and this has nothing to do with AI art.

  31. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >You have no respect for artists.
    correct

  32. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    "Fundamentally, transitioning is just about disrespecting women.
    Admit it. You have no respect for women. Just cruelty."

  33. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    A machine has no actual understanding of what it does or have any feeling one way or another creates products in a profession that is pretty much considered an emotion driven field.
    Of course it seems this way when it exposes the great lie of your industry and shows the products are not worth the money requested for them as you don't actually have to take into account the feelings or politics of the creator when working out the cost.

  34. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I only respect artists that do more than their art.

  35. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    These smug fricks spent years saying "you don't define what is art" now that everybody can do it with a single click suddenly they want to define what is art and what isn't, i hope every single one of them starve.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not every artist says this but it's easier to make a headline with the ones that do eh?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >There are exceptions to your accurate general take thus your accurate general take is wrong and alarmist
        Not a good retort and doesn't really say anything.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Bullfrickingshit every artist used to defend postmodern art and attack vehemently everyone that dared to defend beautiful classical art that requires skill and expertise. You know that.

          Not a retort at all. I've seen many compare it to rotoscoping.

          I mean real artists with a real job, not timmy drawing anime sphere boobs begging for monthly subs.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bullfrickingshit every artist used to defend postmodern art and attack vehemently everyone that dared to defend beautiful classical art that requires skill and expertise. You know that.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          *blocks your path*

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Frick guys like these. If AI destroys their career then it'll be an overall benefit to society. I have no problem with artists drawing anime or even furry shit.

            Its people that do shit like this that give artists a bad name. But "everything is art" so a guy squirting paint out of his butthole can still get patrons. Although you have to wonder if its all one big circlejerk. Either way, as a person that values science, I find most art to be a waste of time.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >as a person that values science, I find most art to be a waste of time.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              kys

  36. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Correct.
    The real redpill is realizing nobody ever respected artists in the first place.

  37. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    You AI Black folk are just so unbelievably dishonest it's not even funny. You come to /ic/ to pick fights with artists who are absolutely nothing like what any of you are describing. /ic/ shits on "banana taped to wall" types almost unanimously. No, you come there to antagonize artists who do what they do for their own enjoyment or in a few cases do art as a JOB job. Don't pretend that you're striking out against MOMAgays when nothing you even do can even touch trad artists or banana wall tapers. This has nothing to do with them, or with politics, you 100% just hate normal artists and would like nothing more than to tear them down like the seething bugman Black folk that you are.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. And?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have infinite more respect for bimbo interior decorators than "lovers of art" you meet in art gallery openings and showings, they might denounce banana tape but are 90% on board with everything else woke/pomo but make you walk through mud to find that out.

  38. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    artists charge roughly minimum wage for their work, most csgays demand 100k minimum for doing moron work that barely requires effort. I get that artists are smug but god damn some of you are actively ripping off everybody else

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >100k minimum for doing moron work that barely requires effort.
      If programmers really did do moron work that barely requires any effort then they'd never be able to get away with charging 100k minimum for their job.

      CS jobs are among the most meritocratic jobs out there. They don't care about your degree, your connections (at least relative to other fields), or your social graces above a bare minimum, they just care about your output and ability to solve problems. And it's easier than ever to learn how to code, and yet CS jobs are still super high paying (at least prior to AI). The fact that coders still can get entry level jobs that pay 120k plus proves there's a barrier to entry that keeps that rate where it is.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        the "barrier" to entry is nothing, that's why so many people got hired (and dropped)

  39. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. I want to frick around and make silly pictures because I absolutely LOATHE people who draw things with a tablet and not because I just want to have fun.

    Also, not technology.

  40. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Voice acting has ruined the RPG genre by limiting the amount of dialogue options and variation you can have (aka the core of the fricking genre, your choices of interaction), and also introducing the irritating "dialogue option says one thing, but then when you pick the option your character says something significantly different" phenomenon. Yes, I hate voice actors and I want AI-generated voices to replace them.

  41. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just want to look at beautiful things. I don't care where they come from.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Artists think people care where the art comes from lol.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Artists think people care where the art comes from lol.

      >art is just photons
      midlet cope

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Artists think people care where the art comes from lol.

      Artists should step the frick up

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      You piece of fricking shit.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >how dare they use my artwork that I signed a contract to make and got paid for!!!!111

        Admit it. You have no respect for artists. Just cruelty.

        >You have no respect for artists
        I am an artist too. It's not like you can only either use AI or only draw by hand.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Kek I love this, time to get a real job instead of drawing shit for kids for a living

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The frick is a real job then? Because programming sure isn't then

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >because typing shit onto a text editor using knowledge you know is so different from drawing shit onto an art program using knowledge you know
          if art isn't a real job then neither is programming/dev jobs.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why would anyone be surprised when signing away their moral rights bites them in the ass?
        Either you negotiate for them and copyright in the contract or you accept that your worst nightmares could happen with the things you create. There is no middleground.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Get real. No one would've imagined a couple years ago their art would be used to train a parasitic computer system meant to replace them by shitting out zombie ripoffs. And it's not like unscrupulous AI trannies give a shit about copyright to begin with.

  42. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    > Hollywood is fricked. The old world is dying. Behold my wonder
    welcome to the internet, people talk like that all the time to hype shit up
    just go to youtube and scan the thumbnail with text. It's just that this time this hurt more than they can ignore. Most of the time they are not even engineers just some random enthusiastic

  43. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stupid artists that rage against the machine instead of using it and fall for trolls are dumb and deserve to be ridiculed

  44. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frick no, modern "art" is a joke. I've noticed the most vocal anti-AI people are either smoothbrains who can draw or homosexuals the AI is better than.

  45. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    This thread just proves OP's point. Although I hope most of it is due to ignorance, because most artists aren't money laundering leftists that plaster bananas on walls.

  46. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's about democratising art. Corpo controlled media loses power when it's easier and cheaper for the average person to make high production value art. Why watch sterile recycled capeshit if a few people with a great idea can make something more inspired of equal production value?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This falls apart when you remember that everyone can fricking draw
      It's not like people are born without the ability to make art. It's not genetic, it's a fricking skill. If you want to make art you learn how to. It's already fricking democratized.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wow ummmmmm gatekeeping much??

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >It's not genetic,
        It is genetic, just like every other talent

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        But an average person can't make a multi-bajillion dollar production value movie or video game, and those big budget films and games reach normalgays easier because they want flashy, polished content. The more advanced A.I gets, the easier it will be for smaller groups to make Hollywood budget looking art while creative ideas and messages Hollywood is too chickenshit or corrupt to allow.

  47. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Personally I don't care. I don't really have a dog in this fight. AI won't stop me from appreciating art created by humans. I'll still go to museums and enjoy the sculptures and paintings created by the ancient masters. I can still listen to beautiful works of classical music.

    If AI can produce something interesting then that's ok too. I don't get why people are seething about this.

  48. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yep.

  49. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    To be honest, its pretty sweet that you can have AI create something for you that you don't have to pay an artist for. If I need better quality work then I'll commission an artist. I'm just a poor programmer working on his portfolio. I can't afford to pay what some artists would want to be paid.

    I don't agree with the sentiment that because some artists are vain buttholes then we should destroy them with AI. I have artist friends that are genuinely nice people. They're probably not at all threatened by AI though.

  50. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >one thing I've noticed about ai art people is they're active hostile...
    Where else have I seen that some hostile hyper-aggressive attitude... oh yeah gun owners!
    Maybe that's why people keep getting shot for turning around in driveways or asking neighbors to be quiet???

    hmm, I wonder if those two groups have anything in common.... perhaps libertarian ideals? Wonder if there are is some weird undercurrent of aggression and toxicity that pervades that entire community?

    Really makes you think.

  51. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    salt mines are back on the menu, thank you a.i.

    Even modern movie posters are trying to disrespect their audience, talk down to them with their forced up-the-nose frog perspective. NPCgays get off by pretending not to notice all the slights against them so that it's easier for them to win water cooler games. You love to see it fail.

  52. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't respect smug homosexuals, not artists per se. Coincidentally it happens there is an overlap between the two and thus making you perceive I hate artists.

  53. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    CodeBlack folk will get the rope even harder for enabling this AI shit.
    Hope all you codeBlack folk lose your jobs and become homeless due to AI.

  54. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >You have no respect for artists
    I don't.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      But those aren't the artists whose art was trained on.

  55. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    When it comes to voice acting, I do look forward to the next Elder Scrolls game with over 1000 characters, all with their own unique voice and at no extra overhead to the developers. Once that model is tuned, they're golden.

    >Who is the model
    Record animal sounds with Microsoft Sam samples and feed them into 11ai (has anybody done this?)

  56. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    digital artists are worst

  57. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  58. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nah. Artist arent that important. Is about disrespecting everyone

  59. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    They don't even respect each other, why the frick should I?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      the best part is that the subreddit got shat on by everyone after, and so the mod locked it down to deal with "the brigading trolls!". Then when they reopened it up, the threads were sucking the guy off and self-congratulating themselves for defending the "sanctity" of their community from AI art.

  60. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Artist have used digital tools as a crutch for years. They all use the same tools and can undo any mistake which removes the character from their art. Remove the expensive wacom tablets and adobe bullshit would they even be able to make anything beyond a doodle? Frankly when you pump out art like a machine you shouldn't be surprised when the machine does it better.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      You don't know what an erasure is that's so embarrassing.

  61. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    But AI doesn't b***h and is performant and can iterate and doesn't b***h yet again... Honestly it's a no-brainer yuk yuk.

  62. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have here, somewhere, a book about the art business, but it is not about who creates the most awe inspiring things to get inspired at, or calling anything art by itself.
    Art "can be anything that invokes an emotion, or reaction". So, by that definition, AI generated content also generates salt from wokeshits and people who enjoy to "draw", so AI ML proooomting is indeed ART.

    On the subject of the business side, this moves as the already well known scam and also at private catalogs. Buys are made with the concept of "this thing will get more value in a year if my catalog collection agent pimps it out enough". 2D photo prints have a serial and ways to verify authenticity, but are copies, only there are not many prints, for instance 50 worldwide, all with a variation. For 2D paintings is similar, by scarcity (that the artist will die soon from an overdose, or he is already dead). For 3D, 4D (3D with time variation) things is about the artist cred value and narrative, and the stability of the materials in time and how expensive could it be to reproduce it. AI ML Art lacks the auth part (besides the crypto ledgers), but they could be presented alongside the prompts.
    The main problem with AI Art is the authenticity and scarcity. Here artists with traditional training and background could make fat income because the model could ingest their own output first, adding emotion to the model output.

    Example: [Prompt] [process] [output] [machines required | memory volume] [source tree] [prompt author] [output canvas]
    For instance, the prompt script could be written alongside the output, at 2D, 3D or 4D canvas.
    Price: market price, or NY scam price.

    Of course this will require to develop within the existing gallery circuit.
    My 2 cents.

  63. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >hollywood is dying

    and here's why that's a good thing

  64. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [cont. because I remembered something]

    There is a market for bootleg copies of all art, even for known fakes printed with plotters, but galleries move content following author collections or series. So if/when you prooompt content you should place an author name somewhere, or release collections with a style that is recognizable. Maybe it will be easier to do that at the 3D 4D art.

    Note that sometimes commissioned series are for "money" laundering (like those thots showing their ig reel that they just sold they art for thousands), where they roll the NY scam, but most of the time it is regular FOMO of old money wanting to cold freeze value outside the banks to then use the "art" for collateral o as the main thing in the lending payments (or reverse leasing, which is how the appraiser scam started). Latest FOMO was the NFT rug pull, but there are always new trends, where the focus is at the "cold storage of value", that have bonus value when a piece belongs to a collection or serie of an author.

    You know, there are also cnc machines that can do the output

  65. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >here's a 10 minute shit-tier sketch of the crap that you commissioned. What do you mean it's not what you asked for? That's just my artstyle. That'll be $100 plus tip teehee
    I for one cannot fricking wait for the day "artists" get on the chopping block so I can go piss on their graves

  66. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI "art" allows me to do things I otherwise would not be able to do alone. If an artist wants to get between me and the ability to act independently they deserve a bullet to the brain.

  67. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Are we doing artgay hate threads daily now? Obsessed much?

  68. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't. People who call themselves artists nowadays really do need to sit down and shut the frick up. Now go back to doing your underage trans furry porn comissions, freak.

  69. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >You have no respect for artists
    Damn right I don't.

  70. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would I respect artists? What are they producing?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Every show or movie you ever watched, every comic you ever read, every artwork you ever enjoyed seeing

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I asked what they produced, not what they wasted resources on.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sorry, I assumed for one second that you werent a pod dwelling bugman incapable of feeling joy

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            You're destroying the planet and being smug about it.

  71. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's very simple, If I want to create something that looks cool and is relatively cheap, or even free, I will resort to AI art.

    If I want highly professional and flawless work and have got cash to spend I'll resort to an artist.

    It's not that "I disrespect artists". I'm broke and impatient in a market where most artists offer garbage painted in 30-40 minutes for $50+, step up your game, you're not entitled to high pay just because you went to art school (lmao).

  72. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is fascist.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      huh? I thought it was artists who were literal hitlers

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        very very obvious false flag account. you probably made it yourself

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          there sure seem to be a LOT of falseflaggers

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >check this account
            >it's completely dead with under 40 tweets
            really convincing stuff here Black person.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              here this one is bigger
              inshallah my friend, let's keep destroying the paintpigging kafirs together, they dishonored islam by drawing muhammad

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >art makes you feel emotions
      >basedcucks seething because AI art
      AI Art is Art

  73. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    kys inkcels

  74. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't really get the panic over all this AI art stuff. From what I've seen you've got to have a good crafted dataset and prompt in order to get some good garbage out of it, and even then you're probably going to get 100's of junk images trying to chase the perfect image.
    Whereas if you actually asked someone to do it they could probably nail down the basic shit in a day and iterate on it from there.

  75. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >pirate programs
    ok
    >pirate movies
    ok
    >pirate games
    ok
    >pirate music
    ok
    >pirate art
    NOOOOOO have a nice day YOU SHOULD HAVE SPEND 5 YEARS TO LEARN TO DRAW AND THEN PAID ME WHEN YOU REALIZE YOU'RE NOT GOOD ENOUGH

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Be piracy advocate
      >Piraten Nintendo game
      >sell cracked switches and these games
      You arent one anymore the Moment you make money with this and employ people
      People are so blind in hating in Nintendo they forget what piracy is

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >overpriced licensing israelite corpos
      >hollywood billionaire corpos
      >biggest revenue entertainment industry in the world corpos
      >record label israelites corpos
      >starving homosexuals who can barely make ends meet
      Hmm no I see no difference

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >every artist is poor
        >every other creator is a rich corporation
        KEK

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      bad analogy, pirating =/= competing

      sorry inkcel time to open an onlyfans

      deepfakes are coming too lol

  76. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nah but to the one e-girlcon Incel who bullied one of my favorite Artists with Ai Art
    Frick you

  77. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    sorry inkcel time to open an onlyfans

  78. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wrong. Fundamentally, AI art is about reducing costs. That's it. If you're an artist, it sucks to suck I guess but it's literally nothing personnel, kiddo. It's not like AI art will replace every single artistic need anyhow.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >It's not like AI art will replace every single artistic need anyhow.
      The current models will never even be able to do basic job of a concept artist. You can't feed a game design document into an AI and expect it to eg design 10 weapons or 10 locations that are all consistent and fit into lore. Our solutions do not scale like that and any real task requires intelligence these models are lacking. "draw the first thing that comes to your mind when you hear this sentence" is only useful when all you need is cheap commission artist that you can get for 10$ on fiverr. Real artists need to produce art that is consistent with the rest of the project, its designs, ideas, lore, works of other artists, etc. AI will not be able to do that for long time.

  79. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It takes a special kind of soulless degenerate to cheer on the decay of tens of thousands of years tradition of craftsmanship. Probably the same type of person who would argue in favor of bananas taped to the wall.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      there's no decay, quit your whining, that's what people are cheering on

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >It takes a special kind of soulless degenerate to cheer on the decay of tens of thousands of years tradition of agriculture

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes?
        Are you telling me nothing was lost when we transitioned to industrial farming? A whole lifestyle and worldview gone forever.
        See this is what I mean. To you, everything is a commodity to be consumed. You just want to stuff yourself and you don't care about anything else.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >do not cry my son. Your 9th brother just died at the age of 5 but at least we have our favourite lifestyle and worldview

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >A whole lifestyle and worldview gone forever.
            except it's not gone, you drama queen.

            Yeah not gonna argue further with you disingenuous morons. At least I hope you're being disingenuous because the alternative would be far sadder.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >I am not going to argue with someone who thinks differently than I do

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              They are not
              You should have known that the second anon made yet another shit comparison with farming tools

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >A whole lifestyle and worldview gone forever.
          except it's not gone, you drama queen.

  80. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hollywood TV writers went on strike, the studios are going to replace them with AI.

  81. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I never had respect for artists, not even before Ai. Warhol can go choke on dick.

    But back to the image, artists can't say that because they can't mass scale create art. Blender animators can't mass create hand animations. Ai can.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      lol, pomo hacks like warhol will get away scot free from this ordeal because what they do is bullshit to begin with. It's the actually skilled artists who bothered putting work into it who will be the most affected. Warhol would've been delighted to proompt all his shit.

  82. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    As much as I hate AI art generation, I do like how it makes artists with huge egos seethe. A lot of big artists have this walled perspective where they only interact with other high profile artists and treat their commissioners like crap, frick them. Most artists don't actually care if they get "replaced" because they genuinely enjoy drawing their own shit instead of chasing clout from normies

  83. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    All AI does is speed up and simplify the process of Idea to Image. To make a piece of art you still need an idea of what you want to see, all AI art does is take the mechanical skill out of it.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >mechanical skill
      lol
      Using AI you'll never learn how to formulate an idea of your own. You're forever stuck spouting vague concepts and let the AI fill in the blanks for you because you are mentally lazy. If you were truly able to visualize what you want you would be able to draw it. This is what 99% of the grind is about, learning to visualize.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >If you were truly able to visualize what you want you would be able to draw it.
        Stephen Hawking was great at visualising things and prompting other people to draw them, but he certainly couldn't draw anything by himself.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous
  84. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    i ran it locally and in the time it took to generate something good i could’ve just drawn it, which would’ve been more satisfying and mentally enriching.

    the only way to generate anything decent is by using hypernetworks or alternative models in which case everything you generate is in a specific style. it’s hardly like you can envision something and create it exactly how you want it to be, it’ll always be rendered in a pre-made style

  85. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    This guy is a font of wonderous butthurt. I've never seen any "artist" so upset by the encroachment of technology. He's so self-absorbed he can't even see that eventually AI will come for us all.

  86. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    that is true. Artists suck

  87. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI shit is fricking disturbing.
    It's just disturbing.

    You know what else is disturbing?
    Criminals, murderers, sex offenders.
    You know how many of those you gotta deal with on a day to day basis?
    virtually none cause we have these cool things called prisons, where the disturbed individuals are stuck in some unlabeled dark box hidden away from functioning society.

    So the logic of getting AI to do shit, when the shit AI does is disturbing, is basically like rewarding all those disturbed prison criminals with freedom and the ability to hold positions of authority; they produce the hottest radio songs, they produce the biggest boxoffice movies, they produce our politics, they produce our art.

    Why waste electrical power rather than just liberating all the psychopaths?

    Oh, cause we're not /actually/ moronic.
    That's why we don't do that shit.
    That's why we keep prisoners in prison.

    So what is the benefit of emulating this free-reign psychosis via AI?

    Is it just a measure of the states of mind behind those who do the work to curate and program the AI into existence? That they too should better serve society behind concrete walls printing license plates?

    food for THOT.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >we should ban things/jail people because they make me feel bad
      >justice? protecting victims and innocent? resocialization? Nah, I just them disturbing
      >what do you mean, I am not the psychopath, they are

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        bruh

  88. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I mean yeah. Art isn't fricking real. Who gives a frick what artists think about anything meaningful?

  89. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI generated anything is a thorough disrespect and hostility against any notion of natural suggestion. Why restrict it to art? ChatGPT is happy to intently and persuasively tell objectively provable lies about science, mathematics, and the world.

    Real-talk, if most sane people didn't have some background filter running through their mind for selectively interpreting the varieties of utterly fricking moronic information available on the internet, they wouldn't be sane. Pop-ups here, sex-ads there, obviously-not-english suggestions and recommendations everywhere, just trying to get from where you are on the internet to where you want to be. It's like being accosted constantly by street vendors passing out fliers - worse, really.

    Training AI on internet data does not assume that selective mentality, and in-fact training AI on data that could be collected from the internet is probably the number one guaranteed way to end up with a psycho bad-end evil AGI, just as much as modern zoomers who'd grown up on the internet are fundamentally fricked in the head.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ChatGPT is happy to intently and persuasively tell objectively provable lies about science, mathematics, and the world.
      Wow, it's just like ChatGPT is just a GPT-type transformer language model for text generation, and not an actual encyclopedia or dictionary.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        k

  90. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >wah wah wah
    have fun flipping burgers, Black person.

  91. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    You all think you want this. You do not know what you are asking for though. It probably doesn't even matter anymore. We've already lost our souls and what it means to be human. We spend all day alone in our bedrooms, playing video games, watching porn, doing absolutely nothing. I used to be anti AI art. But frankly nothing matters anymore anyways. You are all pathetic.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Don't give up man. There are more people than you who want out of this nihilistic technological mire. We just need to find a direction and find each other.

  92. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    "Artists" have lost any creditability they have when they abandoned morels, ethics, and virtue to get ahead in Hollyisraelite, they didn't give a shit about what filth or degenerate agenda was being pushed as long as it gave money and status.

    so in short frick em, we won't be getting anything better from A.I but it's more of a "From hell's heart, I stab at thee" feeling

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >muh culture war
      kys

  93. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like that AI art pisses off both starving artists who think that every skill must be worth a full salary, and wannabe fascists who think good art must require skill. Reminds me of this excerpt from Robert Nozick:
    >If some people made things effortlessly, as the cartoon characters in The Yellow Submarine trail flowers in their wake, would they have lesser claim to their products whose making didn't cost them anything?

    Of course, I like being able to turn 50 pictures of an anime girl into 5000 even more

  94. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Dey Ai's took our jerbs!

  95. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Business people are scum. They will get rid of anyone if it makes them more money. AI is copyright infringement on an unprecedented scale and these companies should be sued into the oblivion imo.

    AI never creates anything new. It outputs derivatives of what it consumed during training. Thanks "god" it can't do more.

    Some modern artists are kinda shitty (the ones that create these shitty "corporate art" with people with horrendously oversized unnatural limbs) but there are people that might actually worked their lives to hone their craft and became good and don't deserve being throwed away like a trash.

    t. not an artist

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Hates "business people"
      >Supports copyright laws
      homie wut

  96. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Aw, boohoo! Let me play a sad song for you on the world's smallest violin!

    But in all seriousness, I don't see AI art that way. I see it as a way for people who have terrible drawing skills to make great art, with just a few lines of text and some edits in Photoshop. In my case, I've always struggled with drawing anything, regardless of what it is. No matter what tutorials I try, I always screw it up. Because of this, I just don't draw anything anymore. With AI art, I can make whatever art I want, without the hassle of learning how to draw. All you need is just a couple lines of text, and some editing skills on Photoshop, and you're good to go! It can also replicate most artists with ease, meaning you don't have to waste your hard earned money on some art! Besides, have you ever noticed how much money these artists charge for commissions these days? One artist that I'm a pretty big fan of charges at least 200-300 euros for a simple colored drawing. With a few additional options, and conversion to Canadian dollars, the price skyrockets to 500-600 dollars, which is just as much as a brand new Xbox or PS5. I will not drain that much money out of my account just for some art. I'd rather pay anything below 50 dollars for art. Basically, getting art now is completely unaffordable, so the only way around it is to make your own with AI.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      So you're lazy, without talent and jealous of real artists. Got it. More confessions to make?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, would you really blow your entire bank account on expensive commissions? I'm not necessarily jealous of them, I just find their prices to be extremely ludicrous, especially during inflation. Most of us don't make that much money, so we can't just waste it all on commissions. Yes, we do like getting art of our OCs, but if commissioning art costs as much as a brand new video game console, I'd rather buy the console. At most, commissions should be affordable for most people, at around 100 dollars or lower.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          NTA but
          Commission starving asian artists instead of starving western artists. I have better experience with them than western artist who already “ran” away with my commission deposit saying it’s still on WIP when in fact its been 6 months already. (He refused refunds.)

          Meanwhile Japs, Indonesian and Singaporean artists are all happy to work on your commission ASAP and do any changes for free. While costing 50$ max for colored piece.

  97. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tradchads like me won.

    Digitalgays lost.

    >omg anon why are you still painting in canvas or drawing with paper and pen??? It’s so outdated!
    I won.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >imagine doing art to get praises a normie
      tradnormie

  98. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is meant to demoralize.
    Capitalism has already convinced everyone to monetize their time by way of gig economy, hustle culture, and social media.
    By making art feel incredibly cheap you get people further putting time into money making endeavors

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Capitalism has already convinced everyone to monetize their time by way of gig economy, hustle culture, and social media.
      good
      >By making art feel incredibly cheap you get people further putting time into money making endeavors
      good

  99. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    They have been training AI on your code too, without permission or compensation. Artists and programmers aren't enemies. We're supposed to side against the elite that want us to fight with each other.

  100. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >cruelty
    its the internet dude, what did you expect?

  101. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    "Disrespect" implies it's a voluntary, intentional decision. I simply do not think about artists at all when generating AI art.

  102. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    No doubt A.I has taken a huge chunk out of the scene, but A lot of artist who make their money from people mostly built relationships with their audience won't be losing them soon. Even if A.I can ape their style, people who buy the authors work buy it for the authors decisions in subject matter and composition, not surface level style.
    Basically, you can get some cheap chink knockoff that will last you a few days versus something more long lasting.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not to mention, the relationships artist make with their audience are currating genuine people versus A.I propters who will be currating people who are naturally thrifty and cheap. They are doomed to make pennys.
      Still the human element can make all sorts of chaos. I've already seen propters make some cash on patreon, so if you know how to sell it, there ya go.

  103. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >social media engagement bait tactics
    This is all it is, when you live your entire life on a 'sort by obnoxious' website you'll think everything is obnoxious

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *