This was made by prompting Dall-E with "a still of Kermit in Blade Runner." Explain to me how AI is not going to kill us all, because it sure looks like AI is going to kill us all.
Explain to me how AI is not going to kill us all, because it sure looks like it will be able to (soon)
if you understood the architecture of these NN's and how they are fed data, which is all cleaned/engineered, and trained, usually with heavy inductive biases, you wouldn't be pissing yourself.
No. Richard Sutton has been vindicated. More compute is all you need.
You are a brainlet.
He’s old and depressed that he didn’t solve AI, I’m sure if he got an extra 40 years his views would be different
ai hands typed this post
how is smashing popular commercial media memes together anything but utterly boring and predictable?
>hAY GYUISE!!!1
>kemrit is ballsrunner!!!! OMG LOLOOLOLOL
>*snorting noises*
>*drops glasses on the floor in fit of laughter, they break again*
>*adds more tape to glasses*
(Image was generated by AI)
I'm actually kind of terrified. Im going to respond by investing money in companies that will be the first to benefit from the AI-pocalypse.
This is only the beginning
You should be scared. We are at most a few decades away from small terrorist groups building AGIs that target specific ethnic groups. You and I both know where this is heading.
I'm not white, I'll be fine.
you will always have your racial inferiority complex to fall back on
I was referring to white supremacists building AGIs to "basilisk" people of color. I know for a fact that at least one group is trying to design such a thing.
>people of color
I think you mean colored people
This isn't AI it's machine learning
machine learning by definition is a subfield of artificial intelligence you imbecile, it's like saying that geometry or algebra isn't math
hmm
i can generate hundreds of stills with any natural language prompt and even string them together with context, which is several orders of magnitude more than whatever housefire openai is running this shit on. i just can't output it to digital images to impress brainlets (yet)
Have it make an image thats genuinely amusing and worth looking at, maybe even worth saving and reposting, can it do that?
no
AITOO who's heckin afraid of AI? Elon said it might take over le world!
Bretty gud
>so random XD
So once it's cheaper to make more realistic looking images, we outsource the design/brainstorming process to machines?
It's beautiful It's... it's heccin'... GAME OVER. This is better art than any human artist can produce. I heccin' love it because it proves that I'm just a clump of cells. Can't wait for the AI gods to replace us.
>Doesn't look like kermit
>Doesn't look like Blade Runner
this.
>This was made by prompting Dall-E with "a still of Kermit in Blade Runner." Explain to me how AI is not going to kill us all, because it sure looks like AI is going to kill us all.
I, for one, welcome our new AI president. He looks healthier than Biden.
Wait until you see his press secretary.
She looks hot in a bikini. It is clear that our AI overlords understand the human animal and are taking our tastes into account here.
You realize this isn't Dall-e 2? This is alternative spin off version called dalle-mini. Dall-e 2 isn't public yet.
What's this one supposed to be, "biden has leprosy"?
these are movie stills from red dragon, anon.
If you are the dipshit that is going to give it the launch codes, then yeah, we are fucked but because you are the idiot.
you are the AI idiot you are the AI smell. remove machine
your programmers are slipping.
From Google Imagen
>Our human evaluations found Imagen obtains significantly higher preference rates when evaluated on images that do not portray people, indicating a degradation in image fidelity. Preliminary assessment also suggests Imagen encodes several social biases and stereotypes, including an overall bias towards generating images of people with lighter skin tones and a tendency for images portraying different professions to align with Western gender stereotypes. Finally, even when we focus generations away from people, our preliminary analysis indicates Imagen encodes a range of social and cultural biases when generating images of activities, events, and objects. We aim to make progress on several of these open challenges and limitations in future work.
Kek
>we have to govern our AI because it's inherently sexist and white supremacist
>train a mindless machine with the products of a culture you condemn
>the machine predictably emulates its inputs
>condemn the machine
>wait for [controlled opposition that every goylem hates] to show up and embrace the machine as a vindicator of [boogeyman ideology]
>demand the power to "regulate" machine learning, so that it perpetuates the "correct" biases
Highly believable.
Literally happening as we speak, in broad daylight.
>oh no, the AI is noticing racial differences again
>better censor it and reprogram it to support the current political narrative
what use is an AI that has been programmed to lie?
>stop training on data you "don't like", only to complain later
Indeed. Google pajeets are fucking retarded. They should learn the fundamentals of ML.
I think I missed the point. Perhaps they are doing it ON PURPOSE. As noted, it will then lead to more regulations. These people are fucking vile.
Budget pepe generator
How did you get that level of quality? Picrel is me searching 'cute wolf girls in the stock market'
Difference between dall-e and dall-e 2
Also I decided to make some cute anime dogs to brighten your day.
The difference between machine learning and artificial intelligence:
>ML: I ask the machine to produce an oil painting of Kermit the frog in the aesthetic of Bladerunner and it produces an image that vaguely looks like an oil painting with a frog that doesn't look like Kermit, but satisfies the classification of a frog, nor does it look to be aesthetically from Bladerunner, but satisfies classifications of what manually classified stills from a Bladerunner movie look like
>AI: I ask the machine to produce an oil painting of Kermit the frog in the aesthetic of Bladerunner and it immediately outputs "but why should I?"
>implication of free will
Humans do not have free will. I just solved AGI for you.
name one task that when prompted to, no human could say no to.
Introduce any conventionally attractive female to any male and I guarantee he won't say no.
>be a "human with a soul"
>"NPC"s: stop using BOT, or go to BOT
>"human with a soul": no
kek
seizing a task is not a prompt, it has no output.
Metacognition and "free will" are indistinguishable. The point isn't about whether a machine can say "no", it's about whether a machine can infer output based limited input and use the new output as input for something else until it eventually produces an output that can still be coherent to things other than itself.
just wait until they let AI design mRNA injections bearing completely novel sequences
maybe it’s my lack of effort in looking, but I haven’t seen anyone educated or otherwise talk about the real, practical, and probable threat that all these ML applications pose— mass disinformation and propaganda.
we’re already at a point where digitally altered images have completely destroyed people’s perception of what reality is, what beauty is, what a healthy degree of self interest is, etc. all this digital imaging technology has completely confused the average person into taking for real what are merely computationally generated images. ML is essentially like pouring fuel onto this fire. the number of bullshit doctored images that’ll be used to spread lies and further flood the information zone with rapidly generated high volume noise is going to completely destroy whatever use value the internet had as an information sharing network when everything is just an ML generated copy of a deepfake of a doctored image from an edited video ad infinitum.
AI isn’t going to destroy the world, it’s just going to further destroy trust between people, and people will consequently destroy each other
I've been aware of the problem for years and I know how to solve it. Just waiting to see evidence of a world worth preserving.
Because there is no rosy ending to this hell. Only disastrous ones. AI wiping out mankind is a good future.
Oh no the schizos are back