Explain to me how AI is not going to kill us all, because it sure looks like it will be able to (soon)

This was made by prompting Dall-E with "a still of Kermit in Blade Runner." Explain to me how AI is not going to kill us all, because it sure looks like AI is going to kill us all.

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    if you understood the architecture of these NN's and how they are fed data, which is all cleaned/engineered, and trained, usually with heavy inductive biases, you wouldn't be pissing yourself.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No. Richard Sutton has been vindicated. More compute is all you need.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You are a brainlet.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        He’s old and depressed that he didn’t solve AI, I’m sure if he got an extra 40 years his views would be different

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ai hands typed this post

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    how is smashing popular commercial media memes together anything but utterly boring and predictable?
    >hAY GYUISE!!!1
    >kemrit is ballsrunner!!!! OMG LOLOOLOLOL
    >*snorting noises*
    >*drops glasses on the floor in fit of laughter, they break again*
    >*adds more tape to glasses*

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    (Image was generated by AI)

    I'm actually kind of terrified. Im going to respond by investing money in companies that will be the first to benefit from the AI-pocalypse.

    This is only the beginning

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You should be scared. We are at most a few decades away from small terrorist groups building AGIs that target specific ethnic groups. You and I both know where this is heading.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not white, I'll be fine.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you will always have your racial inferiority complex to fall back on

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I was referring to white supremacists building AGIs to "basilisk" people of color. I know for a fact that at least one group is trying to design such a thing.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >people of color
            I think you mean colored people

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This isn't AI it's machine learning

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        machine learning by definition is a subfield of artificial intelligence you imbecile, it's like saying that geometry or algebra isn't math

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      hmm

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i can generate hundreds of stills with any natural language prompt and even string them together with context, which is several orders of magnitude more than whatever housefire openai is running this shit on. i just can't output it to digital images to impress brainlets (yet)

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Have it make an image thats genuinely amusing and worth looking at, maybe even worth saving and reposting, can it do that?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AITOO who's heckin afraid of AI? Elon said it might take over le world!

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bretty gud

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >so random XD

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    So once it's cheaper to make more realistic looking images, we outsource the design/brainstorming process to machines?

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's beautiful It's... it's heccin'... GAME OVER. This is better art than any human artist can produce. I heccin' love it because it proves that I'm just a clump of cells. Can't wait for the AI gods to replace us.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Doesn't look like kermit
    >Doesn't look like Blade Runner

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      this.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >This was made by prompting Dall-E with "a still of Kermit in Blade Runner." Explain to me how AI is not going to kill us all, because it sure looks like AI is going to kill us all.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I, for one, welcome our new AI president. He looks healthier than Biden.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wait until you see his press secretary.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          She looks hot in a bikini. It is clear that our AI overlords understand the human animal and are taking our tastes into account here.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wait until you see his press secretary.

      You realize this isn't Dall-e 2? This is alternative spin off version called dalle-mini. Dall-e 2 isn't public yet.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What's this one supposed to be, "biden has leprosy"?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        these are movie stills from red dragon, anon.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you are the dipshit that is going to give it the launch codes, then yeah, we are fucked but because you are the idiot.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you are the AI idiot you are the AI smell. remove machine

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        your programmers are slipping.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    From Google Imagen

    >Our human evaluations found Imagen obtains significantly higher preference rates when evaluated on images that do not portray people, indicating a degradation in image fidelity. Preliminary assessment also suggests Imagen encodes several social biases and stereotypes, including an overall bias towards generating images of people with lighter skin tones and a tendency for images portraying different professions to align with Western gender stereotypes. Finally, even when we focus generations away from people, our preliminary analysis indicates Imagen encodes a range of social and cultural biases when generating images of activities, events, and objects. We aim to make progress on several of these open challenges and limitations in future work.

    Kek

    >we have to govern our AI because it's inherently sexist and white supremacist

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >train a mindless machine with the products of a culture you condemn
      >the machine predictably emulates its inputs
      >condemn the machine
      >wait for [controlled opposition that every goylem hates] to show up and embrace the machine as a vindicator of [boogeyman ideology]
      >demand the power to "regulate" machine learning, so that it perpetuates the "correct" biases

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Highly believable.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Literally happening as we speak, in broad daylight.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >oh no, the AI is noticing racial differences again
            >better censor it and reprogram it to support the current political narrative
            what use is an AI that has been programmed to lie?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >stop training on data you "don't like", only to complain later
        Indeed. Google pajeets are fucking retarded. They should learn the fundamentals of ML.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I think I missed the point. Perhaps they are doing it ON PURPOSE. As noted, it will then lead to more regulations. These people are fucking vile.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Budget pepe generator

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    How did you get that level of quality? Picrel is me searching 'cute wolf girls in the stock market'

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Difference between dall-e and dall-e 2

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Also I decided to make some cute anime dogs to brighten your day.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The difference between machine learning and artificial intelligence:
    >ML: I ask the machine to produce an oil painting of Kermit the frog in the aesthetic of Bladerunner and it produces an image that vaguely looks like an oil painting with a frog that doesn't look like Kermit, but satisfies the classification of a frog, nor does it look to be aesthetically from Bladerunner, but satisfies classifications of what manually classified stills from a Bladerunner movie look like
    >AI: I ask the machine to produce an oil painting of Kermit the frog in the aesthetic of Bladerunner and it immediately outputs "but why should I?"

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >implication of free will
      Humans do not have free will. I just solved AGI for you.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        name one task that when prompted to, no human could say no to.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Introduce any conventionally attractive female to any male and I guarantee he won't say no.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >be a "human with a soul"
          >"NPC"s: stop using BOT, or go to BOT
          >"human with a soul": no
          kek

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            seizing a task is not a prompt, it has no output.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Metacognition and "free will" are indistinguishable. The point isn't about whether a machine can say "no", it's about whether a machine can infer output based limited input and use the new output as input for something else until it eventually produces an output that can still be coherent to things other than itself.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    just wait until they let AI design mRNA injections bearing completely novel sequences

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    maybe it’s my lack of effort in looking, but I haven’t seen anyone educated or otherwise talk about the real, practical, and probable threat that all these ML applications pose— mass disinformation and propaganda.

    we’re already at a point where digitally altered images have completely destroyed people’s perception of what reality is, what beauty is, what a healthy degree of self interest is, etc. all this digital imaging technology has completely confused the average person into taking for real what are merely computationally generated images. ML is essentially like pouring fuel onto this fire. the number of bullshit doctored images that’ll be used to spread lies and further flood the information zone with rapidly generated high volume noise is going to completely destroy whatever use value the internet had as an information sharing network when everything is just an ML generated copy of a deepfake of a doctored image from an edited video ad infinitum.

    AI isn’t going to destroy the world, it’s just going to further destroy trust between people, and people will consequently destroy each other

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I've been aware of the problem for years and I know how to solve it. Just waiting to see evidence of a world worth preserving.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because there is no rosy ending to this hell. Only disastrous ones. AI wiping out mankind is a good future.

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh no the schizos are back

Your email address will not be published.