Do you use ChatGPT to help you code?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    yes

    no

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I use ChatGPT to make my coding harder actually. I ask it something and then it purposefully misinforms me so I have to Google for the right answer.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yes I do. Mostly writing classes that implement many interfaces. Or getting documentation for stuff that are badly documented or are object oriented hellscapes, for instance java's ByteBuddy bytecode manipulation lib.

    Most of the time it gets stuff wrong but it saves time.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Every time i use a new lib i just ask for the most basic example of to use something, and then i go from there

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Works well for algorithms too, anything graph related.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          or even gui, i hate doing it especially winapi

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I think its best for getting you up and running if youre not alreay experienced. It can speak generally on things and provide lots of context, and in many cases close-to-real examples. In the end ive come to rely on it less and less as my experience has increased, but it still saves time when prototyping.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I also use to code in pleb languages such as python and js.

        Wrote this yesterday to input captchas faster. Click on "Get Captcha" the input field gets focused. Move captcha slider, the input box gets focused.

        document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
        // Use event delegation to catch click events anywhere in the document
        document.addEventListener('click', function(event) {
        // Check if the clicked element is a button with the ID 't-load'
        if (event.target.id === 't-load' || event.target.id === 't-slider') {
        // Logic for the button click event
        var inputField = document.querySelector('input#t-resp');
        if (inputField) {
        inputField.focus(); // Set the cursor to the input field
        }
        }
        });
        });

        V8VAW

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >he manually solves captchas
          Lmao what a moronic Black person.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Suggest an alternative.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Suggest an alternative.

            >they see captchas ever
            lmaoing at you plebs

            >You are using a BOT Pass. [Logout]

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You never get captcha truths though. Last night I was talking of the merits of marrying coalburners and raising their nigglets. Captcha was DNA42. Deep.

              > Verification not required.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I not a sophisticated gentleman like yourself so I don't discuss such matters

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            most people here use voldy's autosolver

  4. 1 month ago
    Zoom out focus

    So you really want to let a robot talk for you? You don’t deserve that. If you do it’s from your own free will I suppose

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >So you really want to let a robot talk for you? You don’t deserve that.
      This

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I use LLMs only as a rubber-duck and to help me search stuff, but that's about it. For everything else it basically not worth it and often fails.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >ask a C++ function a question, sit there and wait for a response instead of just writing the code yourself
    Why would you do this

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How good is GPT4 for writing c++ templates using SFINAE

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    no

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If I have the solution but dont know how to code it, yeah. Just writing the code should be the easy part but im moronic that way so I take my pseudocode proompt it

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No but is sure is useful for giving me ideas on how to solve a problem if I'm stuck on something

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Chat-GPT for rubber-ducking and getting started with stuff I know nothing about, and copilot as code assist
    Wouldn't wanna go back to not having it
    This is both for personal projects and for my full stack senior dev job

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i use copilot. it's great

      with copilot's chat extension you get the best of both worlds. i know i sound like a shill (and i am one) but it can scan your whole project and you can ask it high-level questions and get good answers

      it's all still several years off from being truly amazing but it's already a huge help

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    good at finding errors in leetcode Medium
    and project assistance in new languages like Kotlin for Android

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No, that's for morons.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I help ChatGPT code

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    yes. i work on different projects with lots of different technologies and languages so it helps me a lot.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly no, I've never had a good answer from it

    Usually it just repeats back the problem/code to you, or gives you a general answer that you probably knew anyway

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    E

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't code, but sometimes I have an idea I want to implement that requires modifying/creating code of the programs I'm using.
    ChatGPT gives me a concise explanation of some lines of code so that I can turn around and confidently replicate or modify it.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >chatgpt coded software
    Somehow will be worse than jeets.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    for any question that would actually be helpful it hallucinates an insane amount

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >ai will take over the world

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This is a screenshot of an anonymous comment which insinuates the capabilities of AI have been overstated in online discussions. The argument highlights a single instance of an unexpected output, but does not disclose any other outputs nor the prompt that was entered.
      In the context of AI, a single unexpected output is of minimal relevance when judging the effectiveness of a model. Depending on the model and its implementation, a sample with no unexpected outputs may indicate that the model is not performing properly.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, but not to actually write my code, because it fricking sucks at it.
    It's really good at explaining code and for providing "customized" documentation info.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Helped me make code cleaner and more concise, I tend to copy paste similar things in different places and it suggests extracting into a separate function etc, made it much better

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No lol, it’s trash for any non-trivial implementation. I’m glad it exists though, I hope it replaces most pajeets and code monkeys alike

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I am an artist, and a purist. I do not use such filthy/gay tools. I am an artisanal programmer.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      pretty much this, I make small craft syntax for enthusiasts.

      copilot is like the miller light of code, what I brew is more like a limited edition summer lager with citrus notes.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *