DALLE but for porn

Is there a company working on this? How long do you think it will take?
My coomer brain can hardly wait.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm looking forward to the legal battles that will ensue from AI generated CP
    Eventually someone's gonna fabricate evidence of rape too from a program like that which is gonna be its own unique problem. Just keep generating new content until it matches your face.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      only the CIA has enough CP to train an state of the art image generator, and they've been banning competing collectors for decades

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know why everyone seems to think it would have to be trained on actual CP. It already knows what a clothed child looks like and it already knows what naked adults look like. Even though there are some differences physiologically it can still get close.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          transformers still produce abominations with all the money and datacenters google and meta have, and the best datasets money can buy. i seriously doubt a current gen image generator could consistently make decent fappable material with a severely gimped training data, but i'd be glad to be proven wrong

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You act like the GANs that produce this content are sentient and understand things like "clothed" and "nude" and "child" and "adult". They don't. The discriminator would need a collection of real CP in order to develop the capability to help the generator improve. Take a moment to learn how generative adversarial networks are trained.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            something doesn't have to be sentient to understand that and the latest models aren't even using GANs dumbass. Get out there and go learn stuff yourself before you try to correct others based on your own imaginary scenarios.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >the latest models aren't even using GANs dumbass
              This thread is about DALLE, which does, in fact, use multiple GANs. You be a retard somewhere else, anon.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nope

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                DALL-E uses a combination of gpt-3 text embedding, AttnGAN, CLIP, and STackGAN++. Just STackGAN++ is multiple GANs by itself. You are a moron.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nope

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If I just keep saying "nope", maybe people will think I was just pretending to be retarded

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the legal battles that will ensue from AI generated CP
      at some point in the distrobution pipeline, a real child wouldve had to been photographed while naked, thus making any form of AI generated CP still depend on a criminal activity. as a shitty analogy, packing weed into a bong isnt by itself illegal, but at some point you wouldve had to buy or grow the weed, which is illegal, and it can be reasonably deduced that you would smoke it which is also illegal.
      until an AI can dream up entirely new things on its own, there cannot be any ethically or legally sourced 3d dicky. remember that it isnt a victimless crime, even a "willing" child still cannot reasonably consent to the activity, and i shouldnt really need to explain that.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That reasoning could also be used to ban drawn CP. Even if you aren't using a real child as a model for your drawing, you still had to train your own neural net using imagery of real children or using imagery which was created based on real children, etc... Somewhere down the line. Why is it any different when it's an artificial neural net instead of a real one?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you cant reasonably prove that a e-boi artist has a stash if CP to reference from, especially since most of them dont. the human mind can say "i know what a child looks like, and what nakedness looks like, i can put those together".
          no MLA we have right now can do that, because nakedness is a concept not a noun or verb.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            no the human mind can't
            child genitals are very different from adult ones.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              what if i want to fap to adult bodies with little girl faces?
              would that be legal and nice?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                maybe? I have no idea how that's related to the previous two comments at all.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                sorry, i didn't read the whole thread before quoting your shitpost, retardo

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                quite the influx of redditors lately

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it takes one to know one?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              were you a child once?
              as far as im aware, using yourself and/or your own memories as reference material is not illegal provided you arent remembering a time you broke the law.
              if these answers seem retarded, its because this is a retarded strawman and you know it. generating AI CP requires a stash of real CP to train from. drawing e-boi doesnt, especially since you can "train your model" on other e-boi art, or otherwise just imagine stuff. did all those people who drew aliens have real aliens to train from? do you think the 3d artists behind world of warcraft saw real orcs to use as a reference?

              just as you viewing CP is contirbuting to the industry that is abusing kids, using a MLA to generate CP contributes, in fact even more so because hundreds or thousands of images wouldve been needed to train it.
              MLA cannot make something entirely new, the human mind can (within certain limitations thay i shouldnt need to explain, >inb4 you cant think of a new color)

              do you really want to argue about ethics, morality and human nureology/pyschology or are you just a pedo that cant admit to it? theres no need for shame, just dont bring this shit up if you have no idea what youre on about and dont really have anything meaningful to say

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                normal humans cannot remember exactly what their genitals looked like at that age, let alone those of the opposite gender.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                bait

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                female vulvas look exactly the same at every age, save for the hair that appears at around 10yo
                most men like them clean shaved for a reason

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                spot the larper, I think you forgot where you're posting.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if these answers seem retarded
                yes. artists don't become decent at human anatomy until around 16 yo. no such thing as precocious genius artists. and you don't learn art using your mind as reference, let alone a decade old memories, imbecile

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >do you really want to argue about ethics, morality and human nureology/pyschology or are you just a pedo that cant admit to it? theres no need for shame, just dont bring this shit up if you have no idea what youre on about and dont really have anything meaningful to say
                ironic that you're pulling this card while accusing someone else of being a pedophile based on nothing except a fantasy in your head

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the scientific term for what he's doing is called projection

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >were you a child once?
                >as far as im aware, using yourself and/or your own memories as reference material is not illegal
                I don't think most people have vivid enough memories of their own genitals as children to perform this task with accuracy.
                >did all those people who drew aliens have real aliens to train from?
                They most likely did not base their drawings on real aliens, but they still based them on imagery they trained their neural net with. Whether they are trying to make something unlike what they are familiar with or trying to make something similar to what they are familiar with, they still need a data set to get started.
                >just as you viewing CP is contirbuting to the industry that is abusing kids
                I don't think this is objectively true. Paying for it would certainly be contributing. Producing it would be contributing. Distributing it would be contributing. Leaving comments like "Great stuff. I'd love to see more of it" in CP forums would be contributing. Downloading in situations which display a public counter of how many people have downloaded it might even be considered a form of contribution. However, I do not think the act of viewing the images is actually unethical.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I do not think the act of viewing the images is actually unethica
                what about fapping to them?
                couldn't the cia agents watching your webcam take it as some kind of support to the industry?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >couldn't the cia agents watching your webcam take it as some kind of support to the industry?
                that's just a reddit teenager thing, no cia agents are actually watching your webcam.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. CIA agent

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          People know what naked children look like because they were children once too. A pedo AI wouldn't and would have to be fed images of children.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the ""reasoning"" could be used to ban children, because at some point they must be naked irl

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this being said, there are millions of magazine photos of child models for underwear brands. while personally i think that shit shouldnt be allowed, it is technically legal and in most cases done with parental consent (another thing that shouldnt really be allowed, "yes please photograph my child mr not-a-pedophile, im sure she wont regret it in 15 years") so you could AI generate sinilar images.
        but again it still isnt really ethically viable as you are still needing real kids to train the model on, which is a big no-no

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There are already AI models that detect CP. So you can set up and adversarial network, as the VP model already exists in a sanitized state. It's like clown room design.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you're going to wait a long time, nobody is going to spend $400,000+ to train a model on something that will have them pay 50 times that in legal fees.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just make it hentai

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ok, here's the danbooru image database including nsfw results.
        feel free to train a model using it and then release it to the world
        https://www.gwern.net/Danbooru2021

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why hasnt anyone done it?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            people have used it for normal anime, see:
            https://thisanimedoesnotexist.ai/
            or the more "artwork" like from https://twitter.com/_aixile/status/1542287395776876544 which is going to be a paid product after they're done shilling it for their pointless game.
            they probably have access to the boobies but they will not release it to the public because they don't want their names associated with it.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Because it's hard, labor intensive, and expensive and to top it off you can't even put it on your CV.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hope some horny graybeard sets something like [email protected] especially for that. Millions of coomer GPUs training the most important piece of AI ever created. Then put it on blockchain or P2P, so it can't be ever destroyed, and the world is a better place.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >you're
      TELL ME YOUR AN IGNORANT WITHOUT TELLING ME YOUR AN IGNORANT!!!!!
      LOOOOOOOOL!!!!!!

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Before any company can work on the generation of sexually explicit material there is the issue of getting access to sufficient training data.
    There are pornographic data sets but those are not freely available; to access them you need the backing of an institution with a detailed explanation of what you want to do with the data.
    I've been thinking you could maybe just scrape videos from redgif and extract the frames but then your data would maybe have too much autocorrelation.

    There are also legal issues.
    Many jurisdictions do not bother to differentiate between live-action pornography and synthetic pornography - or they explicitly criminalize certain kinds of pornography even if they are synthetic.
    If someone manages to generate something that looks like illegal pornography using your product, does that mean you distributed illegal pornography?
    I would argue that distributing a pre-trained model for generation is more like distributing software like GIMP but I wouldn't want to be the one that tries this defense in court.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >If someone manages to generate something that looks like illegal pornography using your product, does that mean you distributed illegal pornography?
      No. You are retarded. The person who used your product would be guilty of distributing illegal pornography (assuming they actually distributed it).

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Honestly I can see someone making the case that the information regarding what makes up illegal pornography is encoded in the weights of a neural network, and that therefore a pre-trained model contains illegal pornography.
        From a technical standpoint I would disagree that this is the case since generative models typically also take random noise as input but trials are unfortunately decided by laymen.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Technically you can generate images completely at random and still have a small probability of generating CP. Also, if you had some monkeys typing for an infinite amount of time, they would eventually produce the steamiest pedo novels. So really, the truth is that we need to ban monkeys, typewriters, and random number generators.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how many more dalle threads do you plan to make today, you shilling spazz
    it's literal advertisement at this point, but mods are so fucking useless

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All current porn is CGI. You've been lied to.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Go to /aids/ on /vg/.
    Image generation is going to be utter shit for long time. But GPT based AIs are already amazing for generating smut and not.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >utter shit for a long time
      uh anon? what year are you living in?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Generating heavily stylistic art is way more forgiving than realistic porn that will not freak you out.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >he doesn't know

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's still stylized.
            Also generating humans is way harder. We are much more sensitive to uncanny valley when it comes to human faces, proportions, skin, hair, etc.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              ???
              human faces were perfected years ago https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

                creeptastic

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you may not like it but that's the ideal woman form

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I don't think you understand that Dall-E intentionally had face generation gimped because they wanted to make sure they could control celebrity faces and such.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              want to play a game? https://twitter.com/triplux/status/1542529379485396995

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i hope so

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      (◍•ᴗ•◍)

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you ever seen a kid eat a frog?

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >noooooooooooo the ai can't generate humans!!!!!!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      well it can't. there is not a single image where it got _all_ parts of a face right, in most cases there is something wrong with the eyes.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't often make eye contact with the subjects in porn, I know some people are different and do that but it's really not a big deal to me.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          face is 99% femenine beauty
          no idea what kind of degenerate crap you're into, but for most males a deformed face is kind of a deal breaker

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I can't tell if you're trolling or not.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              i swear i'm being completely honest, transparent, and candid
              please explain me with as much detail as possible your porn prefferences, so i can understand your viewpoint, and we can both together make the world a better place for future generations

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Just plain ol solo female amateur porn. It does not matter to me at all if one of her eyeballs is slightly more teardrop shaped than the other.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Take this image for example. It doesn't matter to me that her nose is a little bulbous and blurry or that her hand is mangled. This is content generated by a computer in whatever style or scenario you want and we're still in the relatively early stages with incredible breakthroughs in computing power and training quality coming out every few months.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                a "slightly off" face is interpreted as sick for humans. you don't want to fuck a sick whore, or even be close to her. it's genetics

                https://i.imgur.com/0q4zCbR.jpg

                Take this image for example. It doesn't matter to me that her nose is a little bulbous and blurry or that her hand is mangled. This is content generated by a computer in whatever style or scenario you want and we're still in the relatively early stages with incredible breakthroughs in computing power and training quality coming out every few months.

                a bitch with that nose would make you puke irl. i guess you could scroll her face and imagine she looks like prime jenniffer o connelly instead, but why would you do that when there's plenty of porn with 10/10 qts on the internet?
                is like you want to punish yourself unconsciously because deep inside you see sex as something sinnful and immoral or some shit

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I take back

                I can't tell if you're trolling or not.

                it's incredibly obvious now.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                how rude. who's gonna defend fapping to ugly deformed bitches now if you can't even articulate some bullshit argument?

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >DALLE, make Elsa tentacle porn, as shot by Stanley Kubrick

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What ever happened to deepmindy and the other coomer reverse ai face searches? I could never find a solid replacement

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait for dall-e for furry porn.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A company would never do it because the porn industry is too profitable. Content produced by an ai is not copyright protected so they can't stop piracy

Your email address will not be published.