Counter AI Art

Will artists have to literally start using closed blockchain technology for their digital art in the future in order to mitigate this issue; by submitting their digital artwork to a service that validates it through human reviewing processes and eventually counter-AI? Is this idea already being put at work?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Is this idea already being put at work
    You fricker read my mind.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Coomers win in the long run.
    AI art will prevail, if they censor "Danbooru" or "Artstation" there are another 50 sites that rips from them or straight up from their patreon sites.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Models don't work like you think they do so those images do nothing.
    This thread is bait but yeah.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >oh no, ai
    >we need to solve this with borkchain

    You're moronic. Not every problem can be solved with whatever stupid buzzword everyone else mindlessly parrots, especially when after over a decade the technology has produced little other than a bunch of scams and rube goldberg machines that can't scale. There's some cool cryptography research, some significant value provided to some developing countries, and a couple neat ideas here and there, but there are very few if any other merits.

    A better solution would be if artists actually started getting good at AI work. Maybe build something that lets them tinker with the weights/values inside. Get artists to not just be good at designing art, but get good at understanding abstract geometric spaces, how human concepts get mapped to them, and then how to tinker with them in ways we currently can't imagine.

    Also note that AI is utterly useless at imagining anything that isn't just a simple combination of things from the training set. Anything actually new, or that requires modelling higher-order effects of interactions is something AI sucked at 10 years ago, and will suck at a billion years from now if everyone continues to suck Yann LeCun's dick and use deep learning for everything instead of exploring any other options. ML has very little to do with how the brain works, people should start there if they want AGI. Yet they don't.

    Try coming up with an idea that's even a billionth of a percent original for once in your life, moron. And stop falling for every obvious dystopia and heralding it as tHe FuTuRe just because every other lobotomize sheep does the same.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      dumb words words words

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care, I work at a national petroleum company and only use tech as work devices and to play Fortnite

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Arists will just create timelapse videos of them manually drawing the art piece as ultimate proof it is human made. This timelapse video will be attached to every art-piece. problem solved

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Soon people will gather all the timelapse video and make a model of it just to spite artists.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Won't work. too much effort for little gain. Won't be able to make a perfect video and the hands will look off and in each new video you will have a slightly different setting.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It could work with enough examples.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you ruined the fricking bait anon

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Enough training data already exists. Graphic designers (that's what these "artists" really are) could make their work 100% protected from AI training and it would make zero difference. These people are simply delusional about their level of skill and place in the world. They won't be missed.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This. I fricking love all these tumblr shitters crying because they cant make a living drawing furry wieners anymore.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is limited greatly by its input. So all the art AI you see is just a better looking version of whatever coomers and artists were drawing for centuries. Ai is not creative, nothing original will stem from AI. People who take AI seriously are people dont understand high school maths, ie women and leftists

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's good enough for 99% of what "artists" do. Most aren't making art, they're making graphic illustrations for commercial entities selling shit. That's their bread and butter. Making art that's something like a commentary on the dehumanizing effects of social media is maybe 0.0001% of what they do and most aren't even capable of that. They've latched on to the term artist to give themselves a degree of cultural cache that tries to hide they're cogs in the capitalist machine they pretend to hate but make no mistake, most of what they do is making images of things like a smiling beaver sitting on a toilet because the company sells some kind of sanitary wipe. That's the kind of shit that AI will be able to create with no problem and it will remove almost all income these self-anointed artists were getting. We'll see how much of their love of art really is when they can't make money off of being a shill for ear wax remover or vegan steaks.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >

        AI is limited greatly by its input. So all the art AI you see is just a better looking version of whatever coomers and artists were drawing for centuries. Ai is not creative, nothing original will stem from AI. People who take AI seriously are people dont understand high school maths, ie women and leftists


        >It's good enough for 99% of what "artists" do. Most aren't making art, they're making graphic illustrations for commercial entities selling shit. That's their bread and butter. Making art that's something like a commentary on the dehumanizing effects of social media is maybe 0.0001% of what they do and most aren't even capable of that. They've latched on to the term artist to give themselves a degree of cultural cache that tries to hide they're cogs in the capitalist machine they pretend to hate but make no mistake, most of what they do is making images of things like a smiling beaver sitting on a toilet because the company sells some kind of sanitary wipe. That's the kind of shit that AI will be able to create with no problem and it will remove almost all income these self-anointed artists were getting. We'll see how much of their love of art really is when they can't make money off of being a shill for ear wax remover or vegan steaks.
        An american made this post

        AI is limited greatly by its input. So all the art AI you see is just a better looking version of whatever coomers and artists were drawing for centuries. Ai is not creative, nothing original will stem from AI. People who take AI seriously are people dont understand high school maths, ie women and leftists

        also american too

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They seem to be under the impression that if someone asks the AI to make them an image of two zebras wrestling over a corn cob, that the AI does an image search and then averages out all of the resulting images returned. That's why they made those fake images of what they claimed were AI generated covered in the no AI symbol.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't matter, it's too late. Releasing art online is like letting a cat out of a bag. It doesn't matter how much you cry about what happens to the cat later.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Will artists have to literally start using closed blockchain technology for their digital art in the future in order to mitigate this issue
    The irony of artists going full moron and fully embracing NFTs would be a pleasing sight.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They've rejected NFTs in execution but it's clear that it's what they wanted in concept in the first place. Artists want some 100% proof that they are the only ones who "own" an image or concept and that it entitles only them to use it, even in non-profit or transformative works.
      Not even the mouse would be so fricking autistic to get mad at someone on some stupid forum using their material as an avatar without a hand-written request unlike the common artcel.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Common artcels only complain when you take chunk of their work and use it as part of your picture without their permission. And since most of them are dumb enough to think AI makes collages of their work, they react to it the same way. There are 3 groups of artists here:
        1 - The gaolable morons who actually think that AI just cuts pictures into pieces and glues them together, they are the mitwit majority on Twitter. They are also the group that will never believe AI can replace the artist because "muh creativity" and "mush soul"
        2 - The doomers who know how this technology works, and think this will replace artists if not stopped, so they manipulate the first group into frenzy
        3 - The maximum copers who think they can adopt by using the AI and becoming half prompters and half editors. They dont realize they will be very soon replaced by GPT-3 giving better prompts and dont realize their prompts are being actively farmed to train the GPT-3 prompt maker

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          An actual tourist holy frick GTFO

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI can tell if the art was AI-created
    in the end it doesnt matter, its just a commodity, copypasted crap will become worthless, artists with original styles and ideas will become more valued
    think of music for comparison - you have samplers and drum computers, did it kill musicians and live performers? no, you still have live drummers and electronic machines together, in the end its about the quality of work

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think its such a good idea to develop a "counter AI" how will the AI feel about that?
    I'm scared bros

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Blockchain does jack shit, you cant scrapper-proof your artwork. The most they can do is push for making copyright materials being illegal to be scrapped, so no big companies will attempt to do that or else they will face a lawsuit, but anons will still be able to do that. All of which lot of the artists already do.
    Making your art NFTs will mean nothing. Did you forget the "click, save image as" meme? Data scrappers will just save your NFT and even if you somehow encrypt the files, you can just screenshot them. No artist out there is pushing for NFTs against AI because despite artists being fricking moronic and barely understanding the Diffusion technology, they are still not nearly as moronic and computer illiterate as NFT fricks. Blockchain is dogshit for literally anything, they cant even host the fricking images there because of how badly the decentralized networks work, so they just host there the URL, and even just minting one URL takes frickton of electricity.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    do non "artist" care? Let AI art be normal, and frick everyone who loses their jobs over it. It's just the new order, get over it.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ITT; actual reactionary tourists from other web forums

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Who cares
    Get a job

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ENHANCE

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *