CIOpenAI

At this point, it’s pretty clear the US Government/Military Intelligence stepped in here, right? Is this the correct timeline:
>company launches world-changing, seemingly magic tech to the public
>company (and both talk and development of this tech) takes off like a rocket ship
>someone gets spooked at the “potential of the tech” or whatever
>there’s a bunch of board drama
>they seem to circle the wagons and go relatively dark
>still promise world changing updates coming and that they’re taking over the world basically
>my guess is somewhere in early 2024 the military intelligence apparatus steps in around here
>pretty much the entire “safety” team decides, “nope! Frick it I’m out.”
>other companies are clearly catching them
>now they can’t ship anything other than cool demos and all their announcements are about “making things more safe”
>even china starts shipping insane developments
>crickets
What’s going on? The spooks got spooked, didn’t they?

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

  1. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    LLMs aren't magic, Sam. People are finally starting to catch onto this and that's why your AGI meme is dying.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      No the funny thing is morons like him believing that openAI is trying to make AGI when it's only working to destroy every job out there so you can get the UBI slave collar sooner and you don't need AGI for that.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Illiterate homosexual.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Sure thing wagecuck

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >UBI slave collar
        >Get back to work goyim!
        Yes thank you Mr. Shekleberg

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          >He thinks UBI would be unconditional
          Holy frick you're delusional

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            As if what we have now is not "conditional' to say the least? If you want it to not be shitty, then you have to get involved and demand it like anything else but as long as there's shit like

            UBI is parasitic cope.

            which leads to
            >hand rubbing intensifies, we must convince them that they're the SUPER SPECIAL HARD WORKERS so they'll parrot our lines and make sure to pull the other crabs back down into the pot - all for free, because its connected to their self esteem!
            people are going to keep shooting themselves in the foot. This is like the LBJ quote referencing all the white yokels who were egged on by major southern business owners and politicians at t the end of segregation, to prevent any sort of solidarity at a time when worker protections were being stripped away an they didn't want whites and blacks seeing their real enemy as the same profiteering rich
            >"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              Are you pretending to be moronic? What value do you think you still have when you're not providing any 'work' for those who are in charge? Are you 5yo or something? Damn you zoomers are dumb as brick.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                The value is being just happy enough so you're not rebelling because you're starving, while you slowly die out. AGI will take all jobs and they are not so stupid that they will let society "accelerate" to "collapse".

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >Rebelling
                We sure saw that with the big cough

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                You will be a dynamic cost which can only be reduced by your elimination. At best, they will offer you a neet life in exchange for sterilization. Alternatively they give you nothing and you just die

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Your argument is capitalist realism in a nutshell. This is exactly the issue - the idea with UBI (among other things but lets stick to that) is that in a future where people (or not nearly as many people) need to work for things to get done, there has to be an underlying change to the way we organize our economic systems. If a huge amount of the work is done by automation and a handful of people directing it, we can either evolve to spread the benefit widely or we can move towards a cyberpunk corporate dystopia where everyone is scrambling for a smaller and smaller piece of the pie while a handful of megacorps and those who control things take up more and more, using old rhetorical justification because it allows them to continue exploitation to their benefit. We're already on the second path, but it doesn't need to be the only way; it does take realizing that maybe favoring capital heavily in a extractive fashion that fricking over everyone else isn't some sort of natural order, its a choice.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah let's hope your capitalistic overlords will grow some morals and give you a share of their investment. That will totally happen lol. Or maybe you should think of a way of surviving that dystopia early one instead of dreaming.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              >imagine actually believing LBJ gave a single shit about anybody but himself

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              Free money is the killer of civilization.
              Get a job you lazy talentless homosexual! You are not a kid anymore.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Please tell me what UBI stands for anon.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              Not 'free money for existing' that's for sure.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                That's literally the only thing it can be. Any scheme that isn't that by definition isn't universal.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              Universal Buttfricking Implied

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Automation creates more jobs and not less. Learn some history!

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Assuming that happens, there's still going to be a very painful transition. People are going to need to get new training for a new field. And basically anyone over the age of 40 is going to have trouble entering those new fields, since companies only hire young people to new position like this. No one is going to hire a 40 year old junior.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Thats life. It should be painful. People are too lazy and sheltered these days.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, it'll be fun not being able to walk to the store, since the streets are filled with hungry poor desperate people, who will stab you in the gut for the chance to get a proper meal.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                They should be deported. If you dont work you shouldnt eat.
                I could sign up for 100 jobs and probably 80 would hire me in a month. This how it works when you learn useful skills.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Good luck deporting citizens. Those people aren't going to get deported, they are going to be filling the jails that'll quickly be over capacity. You can get a job now, sure, let's see what the situation is like in a decade. And maybe you'll continue having a job in the future as well, but this wasn't about you, it was about the rest. You're going to be heavily affected regardless, unless you are rich enough to live in some walled community of rich people.

                That doesn't work in a credit-oriented and mostly cashless society, you likely just continue to starve if you stab someone because their credit cards are 2FA or theyre using digital wallets while carrying no cash. Would be different if people still carried cash. A more realistic problem would be masses of people becoming cybercriminals.

                You're assuming these are all people who work alone, they could be working for crime lords/gang leaders taking advantage of the situation. They don't need to steal your money, when they can just steal your clothes/stuff you just bought, or ambush delivery drivers. And like you said yourself, cybercrime. Your police's resources aren't going to be enough when over 50% of the population suddenly gets displaced.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >You can't deport me, I have rights!
                lol

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Immigrant is one thing, but how do you deport a citizen? Maybe if they are a citizen of multiple countries, you could deport them to the other one. But no other country is going to accept your criminals, unless you have some sort of deal set up with them, where you pay them to handle your criminals.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                That doesn't work in a credit-oriented and mostly cashless society, you likely just continue to starve if you stab someone because their credit cards are 2FA or theyre using digital wallets while carrying no cash. Would be different if people still carried cash. A more realistic problem would be masses of people becoming cybercriminals.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          this is true in every single context except the one where you are trying to automate human functionality and problem solving. The moment it beats out the vast majority of humans is the moment all problems would be better solved by it, rather than a human. You better hope AGI is a meme, because extinction is the fate of any animal that is supplanted within its evolutionary environment.

  2. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    I would believe what the safety board says if they wouldnt be all females and socialists. They sound like they are technologically illiterate.

  3. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    UBI is parasitic cope.

  4. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    yes, you are right although i only read the fist line
    a world where a thirdie can use ai to dominate the west with god tier software will never be allowed
    remember you share chatgpt with india so it will never be anything more than a toy

  5. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >AGI meme
    Get the frick out of my BOT with your voodoo Black person magic beliefs.

  6. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    it isn't seemingly magic unless you are seemingly moronic. If you ask it anything more complex than you could google it's fricking wrong the majority of the time. It is the ultimate midwit technology and you should have a nice day

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      not if you make it explain its reasoning and give it cookies if its right

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        its reasoning is that it summarized and regurgitated from billions of lines of text you mongoloid, it doesn't reason anything. Are you indian?

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          i can't be mongoloid and indian at the same time

  7. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >now they can’t ship anything other than cool demos and all their announcements are about “making things more safe”
    this is just them trying to make it seem like they're still way ahead of the competition when in reality they're just slightly ahead

  8. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    - Imprecise generated content isn't useful for precise requirements.
    - CPU advancement is not keeping pace with GPU advancement despite GPU costs rising.
    -General model production costs exceed value generated, even with sophisticated ops workflows for several reasons.
    -It's not a genuine replacement for subject matter expertise (i.e. someone who can tell you when it's shitting out garbage).

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      we are way past arguing that AI is a nothingburger. Tons of writers, graphic designers, etc have already lost their jobs to the current AI, and there is no sign of diminishing returns yet.

  9. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Why does that one anon insist on turning every thread on this board into a debate about capitalism? Doesn't he know we have a politics board?

  10. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    No the government knows all this stuff because they’ve been secretly funding it. What makes more sense is that they’re either making a play for regulatory capture or they’re afraid of heavy regulation. I think they know they’re unlikely to get regulatory capture, as the market potential is too big and there will be too many players trying in the game, so now (as we’ll see with Apple tomorrow) they’re trying to split between as many companies as possible so they don’t get regulation fricked. This answer works whether they have a model they know is way far ahead of everyone or if they’re only slightly ahead. If only slightly ahead, then they get more customers. If way far ahead, they’re protected from regulation.

  11. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Circle the wagons. Caulk the wagons. Pull the wagons into town. Park the wagons in the shantytown. Dismantle the wagons to build a barn.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *