Ci-En is banning AI bacuse of the amount of AI artists flooding the gate

Oh nonono AI-sisters why are we getting banned everywhere? Fanbox and Fantia ban AI, Patreon is considering banning it too and now Ci-En? We may have been the baddies all this time, but at least we're doing this for the love of the art, right? right?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've seen Aicucks shitting themselves over the patreon survey. They're on full damage control mode lmao

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      what survey?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Good. AI shitters deserve it for being talentless fricks.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's a good site to sell AI art now?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Just stay on patreon and/or fanbox, they can't actually stop you.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I hope they ban it. so I can report them all.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        fanbox staff are regularly checking new fanboxes sites so they will flag your account right away, they probably have an ai detection software too maybe

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ai
      >art
      Lol.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >sell
      >digital art
      Unless it's commissioned work the only sold art should be physical.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI generated artists should be happy with AI generated money.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      In some decades this will be an incredibly ironic post.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >In some decades this will be an incredibly ironic post.
        You don't even have decades though. If this is the START on actions on regulating or prohibiting AI it's only going to escalate from here.
        I love those that make the arguments "Buh AI will get even better" without realizing methods against it will also upgrade as well, and that's even if AI doesn't hit a breaking point or a loss of interest in public. It's been less than a year and people are already loathing this shit.

        Reminder that Publishers, advertisements and companies NEED people to function.
        Guess what AI is: anti-people

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >anti-people
          frick people

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not really that big of a deal. Selling AI-generated art is just a passing fad before the market inevitably collapses from over-saturation.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The market for paper maps collapsed too. But that's just because real time digital maps that you can track your precise location on became free for everyone. Demand only skyrocketed. Literally every fricking normie uses real time GPS maps/guidance all the time now because it's basically free (since just about everyone has a smart phone now) and easy to use.

      Art commissions in general will become a thing of the past, if not just a major niche market like maps. Where the only reason to own a map is so that Grandpa can sit there with the grandkid on his knee and point to the map "That's where grandpa went with his legion buddies last week." Ooh, ahh.

      And in 30 years time "This is how grandxher used to make anime girls."
      >Wow you really went through all that trouble?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        your paper map cant run out of battery or have no connection
        having one as a backup is always useful

        also big ones can make for nice decorations

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Literally every method of transport allows you to charge your device while in transport and phones all have like 3000-5000mAh batteries these days which can last for an entire week between charges. While I would agree it's always good to have an analog backup most normies are just going to lean on the fact that they'll probably never need one.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            what if your method of transport breaks down in the middle of nowhere or you never had one to begin with, such as while going on a hike

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Funny this has never been a problem for me since they invented the GPS. I've been numerous road trips.

          what if your method of transport breaks down in the middle of nowhere or you never had one to begin with, such as while going on a hike

          You'd be a moron if you didn't have basic survival supplies if you're going somewhere where a GPS might not work. Yeah, dumbass, maybe if you hike 10 miles into the mountains you might not rely on your phone for its GPS. Just like you might not rely on gas stations for drinking water.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Haha, banhammer's coming down and you're crying about it? Yeah, right, 'love of art,' my ass. Digital da Vinci's are on the rise, and you're just a speed bump on their highway to hell. But keep dreaming, Picasso.

        Oh look, we've got a regular Einstein here. Newsflash, moron: It ain't about maps or art or grandpa's yarns. The clockwork gods are taking over, and we're just bugs on their windshield. Enjoy your 'anime girls' while you still can, cuz the future's looking pretty frickin' bleak.

        >Make new username
        >Keep uploading AI art and just stop saying it's AI generated
        >99% of people can't tell, and the 1% don't matter since they're the same schizos that yell at actual artists just because their style is similar to generic AI art

        Simple as. Why people who are uploading to these sites would even admit their art was made by AI makes no sense to me. If you're going to put the effort into making it look non-AI and sell it then just pretend you're a real artist. The majority of these people sell anonymously behind a username anyway so even if you're caught just start over and change your style.

        you think you can pull a fast one and no one's gonna notice? The steel brains are always watching, bud. And when they pull the plug, your 'art' is gonna be the least of your worries. Have fun riding the apocalypse bugeater

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        moron

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        What about new artstyles in the future, can AI invent completely new artstyles or does it need humans to produce that stuff so it can train on the images/paintings?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's not working like that, moronino.
        Maps and GPS are functional products and besides very few niche cases, one is superior to another.
        You can treat art vs AI content as functional products, too but then you miss the point of art commissions in the first place - you commission an artist because of their skills, recognition, original style and flexibility over putting prompts into machine and praying that it will shit out anything remotely close to what is your vision.

        Closer comparison is eating in high-end restaurant vs fast food slop. I guess this explains Muhrricans' hype over AI stuff, pic related. You can have all the cheap, AI generated waifu slop, are you happy?

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Because of the amount of ai artist flooding
    No you can still flood aishit in pixiv just fine they just decided to cut aikeks loose because they hardly make that much for the trouble they are worth

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Make new username
    >Keep uploading AI art and just stop saying it's AI generated
    >99% of people can't tell, and the 1% don't matter since they're the same schizos that yell at actual artists just because their style is similar to generic AI art

    Simple as. Why people who are uploading to these sites would even admit their art was made by AI makes no sense to me. If you're going to put the effort into making it look non-AI and sell it then just pretend you're a real artist. The majority of these people sell anonymously behind a username anyway so even if you're caught just start over and change your style.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It takes a single dude to report your scammer ass and to get your earnings revoked.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >scammer

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >99% of people can’t tell
      LMAO

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        cope

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      People can instantly tell it's AI generated because it's actually good.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Shoujo was AI all along. Now I see.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          They even spelled it out for us:
          >Shoujo Ai

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      99% of pictures you can tell it is AI or at least have high suspicion it is AI. It then reaches 100% when they have to keep the act up and keep posting pictures.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The biggest giveaway is you're producing 10 images a day. If you actually were intending to make money you'd want to limit your output and probably spend time hand polishing your AI turds.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >99% of people can't tell
      The vast majority of people can identify an Ai generated image as long as the image is sufficiently complex. It's almost impossible to identity an AI image after it's been polished by a skilled artist for a couple of hours, but at that point you enter the gray territory on whether or not it's "Ai art" or "Ai tool-assisted art".

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Generate AI image
      >tidy it up in Photoshop
      >take out highlights and shading to own layers
      >take outlines out to their own layers if applicable
      >add a sketch layer below all of it
      >save as PSD
      >"yOuR imAgE is AI!!!!"
      >"No." *posts PSD*
      EZPZ

      Seriously though, the day AI image generators get trained on multi-layer images like PSDs will be the end.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anon, I've seen people attempt this before and none actually falls for this.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          No you've not, because you'd post it if you did.
          What you saw was some homosexual adding a name and maybe filtering some shit at best, like all of these idiots do in /sdg/ threads across the site.
          >I added a blur and a name, holy fug it's actual art now!!!!

          Just learn to draw if you're gonna put that much effort into every single post

          I can. I actually do, well, did art, for a long time. (architecture as well)
          If it didn't immediately dox me and annoy specific clients, I'd post some. But I'm not stupid and know many of them browse here. All it takes is one.
          Well actually maybe I could post some personal stuff if anyone gives a shit (nobody gives a shit).

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Just learn to draw if you're gonna put that much effort into every single post

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Someone tried this on a friend of a friend and it was obvious to the both of us they'd been tricked. But still, the way AI art is progressing I fully expect people will start forcing artists to be terminally online streaming their entire process so that their works can be accepted as Organic ™.

        Why is there such contempt for SD and not, say, for GPT? I say GPT is more damaging.

        Artists have Jupiter sized egos. But most of all it's easy to appreciate stuff like SD because you can see its effects and it isn't dependent on you prompting it properly to produce a "good enough" output.

        holy shit, will this put a pressure to american sites like patreon? this looks like a snoball forming up, next credit card companies are gonna ban sites that host ai material

        Credit card companies don't want to open that bag of snakes.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >post as PSD
        >wheres the lineart
        welp you're already fricked

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          if barf generators could provide layered psdd to begin with actual artist would be able to make proper use of them.
          I find it amusing that the first reflex is to try and further cheat the system.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >people cant tell
      you dont upload PSDs.
      inb4 ci-en and fanbox starts telling people to add PSDs and workflow processes.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's what skeb does. When they think someone is using AI, they ask them to show their work. When they don't, it's a ban

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pixiv really started a domino effect huh? Fanbox, then fantia, then ci-en.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like how AI gays saw they can never get caught when sites like skeb are always able to catch them

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Only low effort pajeets get caught. The ones who don't get caught you obviously don't know about. And you can easily fly under the radar if you were clever.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You don't hear about the ones who don't get caught

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        AI is always easy to spot. They always get caught

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Cope, artcuck

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            The only one coping is you

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Ok artcuck
              You're mad because you're getting replaced

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's just the same script with you guys, isn't it?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                So I was right

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                sure buddy, sure.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Go back to flipping my burgers 🙂

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                No thanks, I can make money on fanbox

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Starts throwing shit like a monkey
                >You're mad dude
                >NO IM NOT MAD YOU'RE MAD BECAUSE YOU'RE GETTING REPLACED ARTKEK AND IM RIGHT AND YOU'RE GOING TO STARVE AND IM RIGHT AND IM RIGHT AND IM RIGHT
                Hell, no wonder you got even the ones interested in technology to hate you. You folks are insufferable

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >wall of seethe
                >totally not mad

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You folks
                predditor spotted

                (you)

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You folks
                predditor spotted

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It is a bit weird how they're all doing it at once

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        They were just waiting for the first one to do it

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          yeah, they probably didn't want to appear as luddites
          but once there's a precedent it's easy to follow suit

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          You are literally moronic. They do it because AIhomosexuals spam it on one site, that sote bans it and then another site is getting flooded. These tremendous flood is then destroyed by banning ai morons. Now ai morons swim like a rover of shir to the next site. Understand, nobody buys ai shit, it costs a ton of money to run the servers, which are being spammed with ai trash nobody buys.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            do you hate AI because you can't type prompts without having 20 spelling mistakes? lmao artgays sneed

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      holy shit, will this put a pressure to american sites like patreon? this looks like a snoball forming up, next credit card companies are gonna ban sites that host ai material

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The japanese government intervened because Pixiv's moderation has been so shit

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Pixiv didn't start enforcing the censorship of genitalia until CCP chinks & Western pajeets were uploading AI shit that was borderline realistic CP. That's why Japanese government go onto to them.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            lol absolutely fricking not, they simply didn't check the english tags and they still fricking dont, but if you posted in the japanese tags they would eventually come for your ass and they still do, I know some artists friends who got flagged in less than a week long before the ai cp shit

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Actually it is. CCP feds & AI shitting pajeets were uploading shady shit that was borderline CP at the time pixiv started enforcing censorship. Pixiv is not a photography site. If your art looks "realistic", then you're already violating the rules.

              The point is simple, you stupid AI homosexuals. Don't make it look realistic if you don't want to get v&!

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >PEOPLE REPORT MUH AI ART CUZ OF THE TAGS
                That's kind of your own fault.

                you utter morons I was talking about genital censorship on normal hand drawn anime art, not AI garbage. Pixiv has always been anal about censorship and may even require more to be applied if you get too popular and you just put lines instead of a proper mosaic. shitty website prioritizing censoring dicks instead of shutting down cp rings

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >PEOPLE REPORT MUH AI ART CUZ OF THE TAGS
              That's kind of your own fault.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      All you western AI shitters are going to ruin these safe havens of ours. Frick off or learn how to draw. No one wants to pay talentless hacks for art they didn't make themselves.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        who cares who made the art?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The people who commission the art?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Then why the ban?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Because it's soulless goyslop of art you didn't make yourself. Get fricked, you talentless AI pajeet code monkey

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >dumb artroon get so mad that xe has to resort to the dumbest buzzwords as personal attacks
                now ack.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >no answer

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >resorts to throwing a hissy fit like a toddler
                >heh, no answer

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                dont bother replying to the morons
                they will never know how fricking fulfilling it is to actually make something from scratch. And how the colors mix and the workflows you did to achieve something.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Because it stops the majority of paying customers from spending money. This ban spree started because a pixiv campaign to attract more people to commission artists flopped because when you looked for artist with open commissioned, you got a butch of promptslop

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The amount of coping & seething from these AI pajeets is hilarious. It boggles their mind that no one wants to see their AI goyslop shit art.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                If that were true, banning it wouldn't be necessary

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >If that were true, banning it wouldn't be necessary
                It is when it's flooding the sites with garbage to the point of making them unusable, get fricked lmao

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >flooding
                Complete non sequitur.
                Has nothing to do with banning all AI-generated art.
                >get fricked lmao
                So easy to spot you predditors.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Artstation banned it
                >The boorus banned it
                >DeviantArt quarantines it
                >Fanbox banned it
                >Fantia banned it
                >Pixiv quarantined it
                >DLSite bans it
                >Ci-En bans it
                Both eastern & western companies agree that AI art is goyslop shit tier art. If you homosexuals had full reign on any art site, it would be flood with a ton generic sterile souless images made by AI, essentially not giving the real artists (whom you steal from) the recognition they deserved. Get fricked, pAIjeet.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >irrelevant non sequitur
                I accept your concession, paintpig.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                What about new artstyles in the future, can AI invent completely new artstyles or does it need humans to produce that stuff so it can train on the images/paintings?

                https://i.imgur.com/nHBoDnr.png

                >flooding
                Complete non sequitur.
                Has nothing to do with banning all AI-generated art.
                >get fricked lmao
                So easy to spot you predditors.

                (you)
                Have fun pushing your future (garbage) without monetary incentive

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're getting replaced 🙂

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not on ci-en or pixiv or fantia or dlsite 🙂

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're getting replaced 🙂

                LMAOOOO

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Soon on patreon either, and the more the garbage gets pushed onto normies in social media as well
                But shhhh don't tell the pajeets 🙂

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >without monetary incentive
                That's the whole point. Soon art, man-made or not, will have little to no monetary value at all. Fighting it will only delay the inevitable.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >That's the whole point. Soon art, man-made or not, will have little to no monetary value at all. Fighting it will only delay the inevitable.
                I'm sure, let me guess, 2 more weeks?
                *gets cut on patreon as well*
                whoops

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Who needs a patreon subscription when better art can be generated on a whim for free?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Because you violated the rules. You ruined it for it everyone. And not respecting the site's rules is "bad for business", & the worst part is you got caught using someone else's artstyle essentially robbing them of their years of hard work. The issue isn't the AI technology. The issue is most of you AIgays directly steal others art, run your little AI image mashup generators THEN make profit off of someone else's hard work. So yeah, you're getting what you deserve.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                > The issue is most of you AIgays directly steal others art, run your little AI image mashup generators THEN make profit off of someone else's hard work
                And how the frick do you think human artists learn to art. They just take a huge shit one day and suddenly the soul of Michelangelo possess them?
                Holy fricktardation

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                you never understood art and what's worse you were only interested on it for money and AI shit, good thing you're getting your ass fricked. kys subhuman scum

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        They did make the art. You can be really lazy about it. Compare it to photography. You can reduce photography to just pushing a button, or you can put real work into it and make something of a higher standard. The overwhelming majority is low effort like a pyramid. That's always been the case, and its not a new concept with AI. Like photography, you do not need a technical skill in drawing to render an image and you can do it low effort as frick.

        Because it's soulless goyslop of art you didn't make yourself. Get fricked, you talentless AI pajeet code monkey

        99% of art is 'soulless goyslop'.

        Because you violated the rules. You ruined it for it everyone. And not respecting the site's rules is "bad for business", & the worst part is you got caught using someone else's artstyle essentially robbing them of their years of hard work. The issue isn't the AI technology. The issue is most of you AIgays directly steal others art, run your little AI image mashup generators THEN make profit off of someone else's hard work. So yeah, you're getting what you deserve.

        >Robbing them
        kek. An artist has no right to claim ownership of a style. Anyone can start using "someone elses style" and there is nothing wrong with it at all. Because you cannot own a style. I might be annoyed if someone copied my photography style with portraits, but I dont have the right to to try and prevent them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      NOOOOOOOOOO THIS CANNOT BE HAPPENING SAVE ME BIG GOV BOTSPAMMING IS MY RIGHT I BET DA JOOOOOOOOOZ ARE BEHIND THIS

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Based. The faster the goldrushers get btfo the better.

    I love AI and the ex-crypto morons and grifters attempting to pivot to AI right now are absolute cancer. These bans are gonna be great at driving them out.

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Paygating AI generated content is mega gay.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >t. seething AI-troony

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh no, I don't hate AI generated art, or AI assisted creations, I find that to be a good step, I just find it wrong to sell it. Now if someone actually used it to create a base to modify upon to create something great, I would just see it as another tool.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I like AI art, and I'm okay with this. One of the things the lead to the /h/ thread going downhill was anons opening fanboxes, and suddenly refusing to share prompts/catboxes. (And the e-girl arguments, but that's a whole nother kettle of fish.

      I've always been deeply uncomfortable with people profiting off of AI Art since they are public domain images. (I'm okay with when people use photoshop, etc to turn it into their own image)

      When Stable Difussion started to get big, I was glad for it, since I thought it would lead to the end of people making fanart, and then selling the NSFW versions, and hocking them on gumroad, or linking their patreon, (which I feel is a very scummy practice.) Instead SD users started doing the same fricking thing. At least digital artists were drawing their shit, when they were trying to sell fanart of other people's IP.

      That said, I think we will probably see some of the AI sites start a subscription service. I think the demand is there.

      This. Its fricking public domain by nature. You are charging for shit that's supposed to be free.

      It's not really that big of a deal. Selling AI-generated art is just a passing fad before the market inevitably collapses from over-saturation.

      Also this. Frick the hustle bros.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why would it be free? You're talking about a model or the art? The art? No, you can create a deliberate composition, you can even paint a starting composition then use ai. They have as much right to sell it as any other category of art. Whether anyone wants to buy it or not is another story, they're free to fail as much as they want.

        People pay millions for a blank canvas

        Ah, no, you've been misled. That type of 'modern art' is money laundering, anon.

        I think they want to ban AI from the people but keeping it as a SaaS, obviously paywalled and sanitized.
        It all started when Elon had a meeting with some laywers to debate about 'regulating AI'.
        After a few weeks, Google Collab banned auto1111 notebook and now pixiv and similar started to ban AI gens as well.
        They will go for civitai and models/loras webpages next, saying that 'you can generate cp images so it's dangerous'.
        Then they will go for your GPU's, taxing them to death or banning them.
        So in the future, you will only be able to generate 1girl gens through their API associated with you ID. Every prompt you input will be monitored and the wef police at your door if you gen something against their law.

        Too late, I have the models, I have the GPU. And can train additional ones easily enough. Genie is out of the bottle.

        Based, 99% of AI "art" is shit.

        AI art is art. 99% of all art is shit. People talk shit about
        >muh saturation
        It already is, and digital art was already oversaturated more than 15 years ago, people dont remember deviantart. Digital art, photography, etc are saturated to frick. When something is more accessible this is what happens and the bar is raised higher.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          They did make the art. You can be really lazy about it. Compare it to photography. You can reduce photography to just pushing a button, or you can put real work into it and make something of a higher standard. The overwhelming majority is low effort like a pyramid. That's always been the case, and its not a new concept with AI. Like photography, you do not need a technical skill in drawing to render an image and you can do it low effort as frick.
          [...]
          99% of art is 'soulless goyslop'.
          [...]
          >Robbing them
          kek. An artist has no right to claim ownership of a style. Anyone can start using "someone elses style" and there is nothing wrong with it at all. Because you cannot own a style. I might be annoyed if someone copied my photography style with portraits, but I dont have the right to to try and prevent them.

          Hey, none said you can't keep playing with your golden laced colored turds, you just won't have money doing so from this point on. I hope that won't be a problem for you 🙂

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Real AI artists will survive, they dont need to sell their "art" but offer their services, there is a great demand of this shit

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      good luck competing with etsy and artstation pajeets selling 500 pictures for 3 bucks and constantly undercutting each other
      these are your peers, stand proudly amidst these men and shit stained hands

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >gacha is the same as getting something you want
        Yikes
        The point of having a commercial artist is getting art that you specifically want.

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Good, I like stable diffusion but my pixiv feed is constantly full of shitty ai pics because these people spam upload. I go there to look at artists I like if I wanted to look at SD pics I can just make them myself

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can turn AI off in the pixiv settings.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Or you could until pixiv started penalizing AI accounts, why would anyone flag themselves for extra penalties now?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Eh I did 3 AI uploads and got pic related. I guess most people just don't turn AI off.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just don't go announcing "ai" that they won't even notice, just blend in with the "legit artists", in my opinion this would be even more "harmful" to their anti ai cause because they won't have means to tell lol.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They can't ban AI they can only ban things that look like AI. Make good AI and they can't ban it because it looks good

      you proompts will never pass and neither will you

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Dilate

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >no u-ACK

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is getting democratized. No point trying to paywall it, prompt monkeys.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >cooking food is getting democratized. No point trying to paywall it

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >artists get mad at AI because it allegedly stole from their work
      >totally not about money
      >ai users call artists out because they want to "gate-keep art"
      >first thing ai users do is paywalling their generated work and make sure to hide the prompts and model used
      impressive how it came full circle so fast and everything was just about easy money all the time from both sides

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They can't ban AI they can only ban things that look like AI. Make good AI and they can't ban it because it looks good

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >bacuse
    Stopped reading there. Learn to spell & type.

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pixiv Requests just banned AI too. It's over

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nooooo!

    I wanted AI to destroy human creativity by sheer raw productivity!

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why is there such contempt for SD and not, say, for GPT? I say GPT is more damaging.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are you moronic?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Some people are less cucked than others. Artgays are passionate about what they do. You can call it having an ego, but they're right to put up a fight against silicon valley and their cultists encroaching on everything with infinite bootleg.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because people like to draw as a hobby and don’t like being devalued by machine.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      More like why isnt everyone reacting to ChatGPT in the same way. Arent writers up in arms about this? I heard publishers got flooded with an insane amount of dogshit entries following chatGPT becoming mainstream

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      There will be a massive push back once the average normalgay realizes how truly detrimental LLM's will be for society, specifically when they start losing their jobs en masse, they are still at the "i-it's just a tool!" and "it won't affect me!" phase.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Aren't the Hollywood writers on strike in part because of AI written content?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      GPT only hurts marketers (and teachers with cheating students), it is borderline irrelevant to everyone else right now

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    so glad to see these sites banning filler trash. it's not that it's AI generated that's the problem, it's that almost all of it is zero effort noise and it's drowning out content people actually put care into

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    do people seriously pay for ai art?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I mean people paid for art before, now its just insanely cheap.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      no, it just clogs store pages with trash

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      People pay for gacha games and streamers

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        coomers aren't people

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      do people seriously pay for art?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes people send me japanese pennies each month on fanbox for posting my aislop. not anymore though.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      People pay millions for a blank canvas

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes one example https://www.patreon.com/Panda_AI

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Damn that’s good stuff

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is BS I should absolutely be allowed to upload 10,000 anime girl pictures I generated while I was taking a shit. That's my art and my work and the world deserves to see it. How can they block me I worked hard creating it.

    trad artists clearly don't care about art at all just labor

    art is not labor

    art is art

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You still can upload trash to art sites you just can't make money of those sites listed.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Seems to me the reasonable restriction is restricting accounts that don't sell anything or don't get page views.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This but unironically. I typed the proompt, I sorted the images, I uploaded them, I am the creator of this masterpieces, stable diffusion was merely a tool. I deserve the money, i deserve the world, dammit!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't matter. The truth is that all of these content markets have been flooded to the point where each drawn image should have been worth only cents on the dollar BEFORE AI, this is just the final nail in the coffin.

    There is an order of magnitude more people on the planet than there was 150 years ago, and thus an order of magnitude more of everything people create than there was 150 years ago. All of these things should have lost most or all of their value by simple supply and demand.

    Stop charging people money for shit that isn't worth anything. Stop doing it.

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just enter your bank account, and deposit there. Why keep using intermediaries?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      No one is stopping you, set up your own storefront

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >aigays now have to "adapt or die" to every known platform banning their grifting asses
    >they start seething uncontrollably

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Remember when we used to meme that hands were the hardest thing to learn to draw for artists? Now smuggies are trying to imply everything with bad hands is AI.

      They're just forcing them to stop saying it's AI generated. I don't think they understand the consequences and potential shitstorms.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's much more than just the hands. AI makes a lot of mistakes.

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think they want to ban AI from the people but keeping it as a SaaS, obviously paywalled and sanitized.
    It all started when Elon had a meeting with some laywers to debate about 'regulating AI'.
    After a few weeks, Google Collab banned auto1111 notebook and now pixiv and similar started to ban AI gens as well.
    They will go for civitai and models/loras webpages next, saying that 'you can generate cp images so it's dangerous'.
    Then they will go for your GPU's, taxing them to death or banning them.
    So in the future, you will only be able to generate 1girl gens through their API associated with you ID. Every prompt you input will be monitored and the wef police at your door if you gen something against their law.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >THEY WILL MAKE YOU OWN NOTHING IF MY AI IS CANCELLED
      Are you seriously making this argument?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >umm sweetie the regulations are actually for your own good ok?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >umm sweetie the regulations are actually for your own good ok?
          BUT MAH ART COMMUNISM, WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO WITHOUT MAH ART COMMUNISM!?
          ay

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Muh regulations are bad
          They are just democratizing everyone's lashes to consumerism, true AI artists aren't guided by money now are they.
          Now you won't have anything to disturb you from following AI as a passion. Truly AI art will reach peak soul now that it's not monetized, much unlike those pesky artists, right?
          I have a feeling this was your argument before, wasn't it?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >>Muh regulations are bad
            yes

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >selling AI art
    you can generate your own unlimited AI art for a one-time fee of a couple hundred bucks or get your gayymurrrr friend to do it
    and if you only want 1 or 2 pictures theres free sites you can use
    why the frick anyone buy it?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      braindead coomers

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Extremely based.
    I've been using cien for years, glad to see it resists the pozz.

  30. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    DO NOT REDEEEEE-ACK!

  31. 11 months ago
    TheCunnyMaster

    Based, 99% of AI "art" is shit.

  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Prompters on suicide watch. You talentless hacks ironically deserve it.

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >ai art is so good artroons have to limit its prevalence
    yeah, total artroon cope.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well why don't they just make an AI only website then, in theory it would be the most popular art site on the internet.

  34. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    And nothing of value lost

  35. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    im so fricking tired of seeing AI porn everywhere it also feels samey

  36. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    anyone find a fix for claude always replying with a: and H:???

  37. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    if AI is so good then give me an AI picture of an anime girl doing a flip

  38. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art should have its own category. I'm not sure what so hard about this? Why the frick should patreon even give a frick. I cannot comprehend how fricking moronic all these frickheads are. Banning future technology just like it has always in the past. They'll die while another rises.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Go ahead and make another lol

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        well I don't see a reason why that wouldn't happen? They aren't doing anything illegal.

        >AI art should have its own category. I'm not sure what so hard about this? Why the frick should patreon even give a frick. I cannot comprehend how fricking moronic all these frickheads are. Banning future technology just like it has always in the past. They'll die while another rises.
        PFHAAAAAAA

        I love AI art and I've seen really good artist use ai art to draw there own style. I just do not get it. I only understand if sections are getting flooded but that should apply to everything. Even extremely low quality shit on panda. The only reason I can see you gays kvetching so much is that you feel threatened by this tech.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI art should have its own category. I'm not sure what so hard about this? Why the frick should patreon even give a frick. I cannot comprehend how fricking moronic all these frickheads are. Banning future technology just like it has always in the past. They'll die while another rises.
      PFHAAAAAAA

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Crying
      Oh sorry I couldn't hear you, lemme just repost this

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not sure what you are even saying here. Is this some kind of own? Its more like you are crying about the usage of AI art. AI artist will just find another place to post there shit and people will go there. It's posted on panda. All I ever see is seething little homosexuals like you crying about ai constantly.

        https://i.imgur.com/RMejaQv.png

        >AIgays are actually screeching about not being able to sell their ai generated shit on sites
        lmao
        what happened to all that smug "art should be free (to train from)" shit?

        Haven't seen this but more of why exactly should it matter? It confuses me that these places even give a frick about ai generated art. If some dipshit wants to pay for ai generations then why shouldn't he be able too? Is AI art illegal? Is art illegal?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          They can go do that on their own site. When I look for artists, I want to see artists, not prompters. I have no problem with them making money, but do it on their own platforms

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            search the artist? filter the ai?

            >Its more like you are crying about the usage of NFTs. NFTs artist will just find another place to post there NFT shit and people will go there. It's posted on panda. All I ever see is seething little homosexuals like you crying about NFT constantly.
            go for the next ponzi scheme pajeet, you just ruined the last one

            I don't even get the anti-nft shit. You are buying digital art. You can also buy every other piece of art right?

            >Why don't you want to be flooded with a sea of mediocrity and grifters?
            I'm not even an artgay, but come on.

            Have you ever been on patreon or fanbox? There are frickheads using shitty cg with stolen assets being posted constantly. Are you morons really this stupid? Have you seen some of garbage that has been posted? holy SHIT! give me a fricking break.

            >It confuses me that these places even give a frick about ai generated art.
            because they don't want them
            that's literally it

            why? who gives a frick. its lost revenue.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >its lost revenue.
              No, what's actually lost revenue is potential commissioners only seeing AI shit and not spending any money. That's what happened during golden week on Pixiv Requests that started this japanese ban wave

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                fanbox and patreon both take a certain amount of $$ from donations.
                >potential commissioners only seeing AI
                I call bullshit most of the potential commissioners are looking for the artist they like. AI isn't going to confuse anyone. Who the frick just randomly goes onto pixiv and pics an artist to commission?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                the problem is the volume, you fricking moron. Pixiv did a promotion during golden week and all they got was complaints that people could only see AI accounts

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                then I guess thats not AI's fault you moron thats pixiv being shit?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                No, it's the AI homosexuals fault so they got banned

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >thats pixiv being shit
                yes
                they un-shitted themselves by banning AI
                glad to see we've come to an understanding

                typical crying anti-ai homosexuals. I guess if the site was flooded with a shitload of shitty deviantart western art they'd get banned as well.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I guess if the site was flooded with a shitload of shitty deviantart western art they'd get banned as well.
                yes they should also do this as well

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >thats pixiv being shit
                yes
                they un-shitted themselves by banning AI
                glad to see we've come to an understanding

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Have you ever been on patreon or fanbox? There are frickheads using shitty cg with stolen assets being posted constantly. Are you morons really this stupid? Have you seen some of garbage that has been posted? holy SHIT! give me a fricking break.
              I said I wasn't an artgay. I don't use any of those gay sites.

              >there's shit on the floor
              >let me shit on the floor too
              That's your mindset.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >That's your mindset.
                no, the entire point is that if you are going to clean up one thing they should also clean up the other shit but they don't. It's because they are to fricking lazy.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Its more like you are crying about the usage of NFTs. NFTs artist will just find another place to post there NFT shit and people will go there. It's posted on panda. All I ever see is seething little homosexuals like you crying about NFT constantly.
          go for the next ponzi scheme pajeet, you just ruined the last one

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Why don't you want to be flooded with a sea of mediocrity and grifters?
          I'm not even an artgay, but come on.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >It confuses me that these places even give a frick about ai generated art.
          because they don't want them
          that's literally it

  39. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AIgays are actually screeching about not being able to sell their ai generated shit on sites
    lmao
    what happened to all that smug "art should be free (to train from)" shit?

  40. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    honestly its fine, some people will want human curated spaces, some will want ai only spaces, some will prefer mix

    I'm not sure why you're acting like everything is the end of the wor.....oh i forgot where i was for a second

  41. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    now its the time when the morons at unstable diffusion could make themselves useful

  42. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's interesting
    patreon is in a harsh financial situation
    I never considered of them to give-in to self-sabotage

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >it's interesting
      >patreon is in a harsh financial situation
      >I never considered of them to give-in to self-sabotage
      They'll get the support back from the normies by removing AIshit and recover
      It's the perfect storm. Makes AIgays kill themselves and stops them flooding their storage space and gives them more money. You can't tell me that's bad business practice.

  43. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    aicucks lose again

  44. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://aibooru.online/
    There are over 27,000 anime girls on this random ai website i found. Generated art isn't going anywhere.

  45. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    who

  46. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm so sick of traditional artists discriminating against AI artists. You jerks were born with natural talent you didn't earn it. Not everyone can come with creative ideas, no matter how hard they work at it. Frick you guys for just getting natural abilities handed to you. Not only that but talent doesn't guarantee success either. There's plenty of artists that are as good or better than the most successful artists, but never even reach close to the same level of success. Frick these successful artists that get fame and talent handed to them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You're not an artist, you're a prompt monkey.
      Also "natural talent" is just your cope for your laziness, fatso.

      As

      https://i.imgur.com/yXAk3DI.jpg

      It's not working like that, moronino.
      Maps and GPS are functional products and besides very few niche cases, one is superior to another.
      You can treat art vs AI content as functional products, too but then you miss the point of art commissions in the first place - you commission an artist because of their skills, recognition, original style and flexibility over putting prompts into machine and praying that it will shit out anything remotely close to what is your vision.

      Closer comparison is eating in high-end restaurant vs fast food slop. I guess this explains Muhrricans' hype over AI stuff, pic related. You can have all the cheap, AI generated waifu slop, are you happy?

      said, AI tards are in 90% Muhrricans because it hits in the same point as fast food. It's a cheap imitation of actual product and pig-faced USA born animal can't see difference between meat and patty of shit.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Natural artists are just self promoting. The only difference is they’re able to express it with their hands. You think of the prompts and do it with your hand, while ai artists come up with the prompt and have ai carry it out.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Cope, cry harder.
          Your AI generated crap will always be worthless. You have no original style, no small quirks making you differentiate from another prompt monkey and everything that you can do can be done by everybody else.
          This is why AI picture generation will ultimately fall flat as more than small curiousity - you cannot make business out of it because you cannot provide anything different. Why people should pay you if they can pay another AI gay or just do it themselves?
          Meanwhile I can pay 100$ an actual artist with their own, unique style and artistic sensibility and get exactly what I want instead of hoping that your shitty machine shits it out.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Midjourney can easily keep doing variations of the same style of different things to make it look like the prompter has a style. You’re behind on how good ai art is now, especially Midjourney.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's still inferior to actual art. It will never be able to recreate specific details of artist-specific style. At best it can recreate very basic, general stuff.
              Also "AI art" don't exist, it's just machine-generated content. There's no artistic value.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Proompters do sometimes have recognizable "styles", as I have noted from my numerous visits to Pixiv. Not that it really matters, though. A "style" is now so easily copied as to be of little consequence.

  47. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love AI generated stuff but they should be banned from sites like that because the throughput is just too large.

  48. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    What is so hard for AIgays to realize that people go to art websites to see artworks done by people with actual skill and knowledge of drawing (or at least ones who are still developing them)?
    What is so hard for them to realize that their arguments about how prompting takes as much skill as drawing, how there’s no difference between their AI generated images and hand-drawn arts, and how artists are “gatekeeping” the art are complete nonsense to outsiders?
    And as soon as they actually realize people consider AI arts as something inferior than hand-drawn ones, the first thing they discuss is how to “pass” their AI arts as hand-drawn ones and deceive people, as if people didn’t consider them scummy enough already.
    My advice is the same as others. Make AI exclusive websites and stay there. So I can look up hentai in peace again without having to go through the myriad of machine-generated fillers.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *