How do we address these challenges:
Global health and development
Health and tech advances
Social progress and stability
Disasters and existential risk
Population and economic trends
Christian Universalist AI will save humanity
How do we address these challenges:
You sound like a liberal queer. You probably also fear death.
Remove the rights for humans with between 0-130IQ and it will solve itself within a decade.
So mass population death resulting in extinction of the human race
Smart people don’t fuck to the same level as retards to maintain the population
What kind of caveman are you?
Are you certain its even relevant here?
>hide pilpul threads
>ignore pilpul threads
>do not reply to pilpul threads
>””smart people”” not having kids
maybe it’s meant to be this way
Fertility rate != actual birth rate.
The chart should say birth rate, unless all the samples involved have been tested for fertility.
There reasons other than fertility that determine the birth rate, obviously, including the deliberate choice not to put another suffering soul into this clown world.
another retard who thinks he's smart
>only smart people think smart people are good for society
Suppose only genius level IQs are allowed to exist. That would simply accelerate technological development to where most jobs are done by robots.
And then what? Utter boredom, probably.
This except only keep 100-130. Kill all retards and autists.
I like how they lost the technique halfway through making a window.
two completely different peoples built at two completely different times
So they built half a window, then waited hundreds of years until their civ fell, then someone else built the rest of the window.
You think that makes sense.
Build structure, structure destroyed or torn apart by whatever killed the people who built the structure, long time later structure discovered by absolute retards, retards try and finish the structure, fail, take credit historically for whole structure.
>structure destroyed or torn apart by whatever killed the people who built the structure
Destruction that leaves the rest of the structure at an exact height completely untouched.
You come up with some real zany shit to justify a silly thought.
people taking out bricks for their own purposes could easily leave it flat its not hard to comprehend. Also not hard to comprehend that all the bricks on top were the original bricks once scattered about and attempted to be reassembled. Might have been a design choice by the second civilization to remove any spare bricks above the flat surface. Again not complicated to comprehend but you go ahead and believe that it was built by the same people.
>people taking out bricks
So now it's careful removal and all from the same level. Just to finish the window later.
>Again not complicated to comprehend
Not complicated doesnt mean it is plausible.
It is far less complicated that the same civ built it and didnt want to continue the advanced technique.
I never said the top half was carefully removed. It was probably chaotically removed. The finishing of the removal was probably done to the last layer of rubble upon rediscovery. An advanced civilization doesn't suddenly become lazy retards. Something being less complicated doesn't make it more likely to be true.
>I never said the top half was carefully removed.
Then there would be evidence of the removal.
>It was probably chaotically removed.All at the same level, coincidentally leaving no marks on the remaining structure. Nonsense.
>An advanced civilization doesn't suddenly become lazy retards.
I work in roofing and see in restorations ALL THE TIME where standards relaxed and workmanship became shoddy by a civ over time.
There is not always evidence of things that happen. Oh you work in roofing so you're an expert on ancient civilizations who knew?
I don't need support to see what is obvious. I'm not writing a peer reviewed journal I couldn't give a fuck what you want to believe.
>There is not always evidence of things that happen.
So you made it up.
>Oh you work in roofing so you're an expert on ancient civilizations who knew?
I have direct experience of a civilization relaxing building methods.
You made shit up.
>I don't need support to see what is obvious.
what is obvious is someone built a window and used two different methods.
You made up shit and then made up more shit when the first bit didnt make sense.
I made an observation and came to a conclusion. Makes enough sense to me. Good enough for me.
>I made an observation and came to a conclusion.
Your observing skills are lacking and your conclusion is irrational and needs multiple assumptions to support it.
No, you deny. There's a difference.
Nope I disagree with you. I agree with me. You believe what you're led to believe. I believe what is obvious to me.
No, you deny, and now you are showing you cant understand the difference.
You can believe all the wrong things you like.
They're still wrong.
What I believe is right. What I'm showing is that I find your argument unconvincing in relation to mine.
No, you deny when shown the truth and resort to believing comfortable lies.
You have nothing but baseless assumptions, and your repeated, desperate pleas to the contrary only show how weak your faith in your lies is.
I have faith in my true beliefs. I'll continue to respond to your disagreement on the matter until I get bored. You believe what you've said is true, I believe it to be false.
You have no faith because you know they are lies based on assumptions you made up.
You will keep responding because you want to deny this even to yourself.
You can make all the claims as to what I believe as you wish. I respond because my beer in the fridge is still warm and I won't be bbqing for anothe hour. I've already said everything I believe on the matter, this is now just a back and forth to serve no real purpose.
I made no claim as to what you believe. You have trouble reading.
YOU made those claims.
I am merely pointing out the claims you made are assumptions and unsupported.
And the purpose is to reinforce the faith you have in those lies, knowing as you do how weak it is.
Wrong you've several times claimed that I have little faith in what I believe, to which I've reasserted my disagreement. I've from the start said my position was based on observation and assumption. You merely demand a higher form of evidence and I do not. Again you attempt to frame why I say what I say and again I rebuff you.
>you've several times claimed that I have little faith in what I believe
Which is not claimed WHAt you believe. Read better.
And no - you are not disagreeing, you are denying. There's a difference.
>I've from the start said my position was based on observation and assumption.
Bad observation and an over-reliance on baseless assumptions.
You want to believe lies, but your faith is weak, so you keep denying to try and reinforce them.
You think what I believe is a lie, I believe it is true. You think my assumptions and observations are bad, I think they are good. You think I over rely on the previous two, I think you over rely on needing concrete information that I believe is easily lost to time. Your beliefs deny what is obvious to me. I can't believe what you believe when I consider what I believe to be obvious and what you believe to a laughable interpretation.
Your faith in your beliefs are weak, which is why you are trying to assert them over and over.
Your assumptions are objectively unsupported and your observations are objectively bad.
Unfortunately for you, his beliefs are mostly correct, and you are being an asshole without knowing the facts yourself.
Only the tightly fit together stones you see at the bottom are from the original constuction, they were created this way in order to deal with earthquakes. What you see above those are shoddy repair jobs done by later people after the Inca empire collapsed, and a large part of them are repairs and renovations That have been made by archaeologists since the early 1900’s to give tourists a better idea of what it looked like fully constructed. Unfortunately they have not done such a good job.
>his beliefs are mostly correct
They are formed from bad observation and baseless and increasingly wild assumptions.
You've literally been proven wrong multiple times by multiple ppl and are still dying on the hill that everyone else has weak faith in their arguments and is believing comfy lies(when what is being claimed by everyone can historically be proven accurate you fucking mongoloid) all the while you're being as hypocritical as humanely possible.
Your claims on ppl getting lazing over time even discredits your own arguments, if this was the case with
then you wouldn't see it just suddenly shift like an on and off switch, like you said it would *gradually* decrease. BY YOUR OWN ARGUMENT, the least complicated solution is his (someone came back after it was semi destroyed and fixed it to the best of their abilities) and if you were actually in the business you claim you're in, you would know ppl reconstructing a structure are very likely to level off the area last worked on, so HIS solution gives it a perfect reason why the well layed stones stop at a specific point where YOUR solution/assumption of it being the same civilization actually makes way less sense as to why it would SUDDENLY and not GRADUALLY stop, if it was just them getting lazy (you'd have to be unironically autistic to think a whole civilization got lazy so fast it happened in the middle of a building being built)
>Then there would be evidence of the removal
There is. The evidence is that the stones are no longer there.
>Something being less complicated doesn't make it more likely to be true.
No, but the more complications, the more support needed.
you are having to add complication upon complication with less and less support.
If you pay attention you would see that as a civilization reaches its pinnacle it gets lazy and retarded everytime. Sumer, Babylon, Rome, Britain, the United States…
who says it's built by the same people? dumbass fucking moron. if it was built by separate peoples wouldn't it make sense that they would iterate and improve upon their techniques rather than pile a bunch of shitty rocks on top of one another? Do you even know what the accepted theory on how this wall was constructed and what it's purpose was? If not, then why even add your shitty 2 cents on the subject? You are pathetic as fuck
Someone found out what they were doing
Looks like the mason didnt finish the job and an amateur finished. This is not impressive anyways, getting stones into shape and tight together is from 1000s of years of knowledge and people of those times may not be smart by our standards, but they knew how to use what little they had much better than we can imagine. A a much stronger work ethic without a doubt.
all this free masonry lying around
Muh stronger work ethic
shut up glowie
but rather than the romans sharing the technique were the
>rather than sharing, they were the post flood
>clear evidence of having to go with a cheaper contractor to get the house finished on time is somehow proof of some grand mystical degradation of human will
You've never been in construction, have you?
>Global health and development
>Population and economic trends
Read Malthus, A Farewell to Alms etc. There is a tradeoff between birth control and poverty. There always will be unless you find a way to generate resources superexponentially (impossible according to known physics)
Science. However, carnivores should still be given rich simulations of their primordial hunting grounds. The question of how to optimize the future biosphere is highly nontrivial
Reusable rockets > mass driver on Luna > sacrifice Mercury for Dyson sphere material > harness the rest of the future light cone
>Health and tech advances
Prediction market proliferation driven by better and better AI
Electrolysis if needed
>Social progress and stability
>Disasters and X-risk
Formalism should solve also stuff like nuclear war. Rational non-populist states will not engage in wanton destruction. Nanotech and AI risks are vastly overrated
>However, carnivores should still be given rich simulations of their primordial hunting grounds
We could have robot animals with shmeat attached
But does that solve the problem? Maybe you can't implement the dexterity of a gazelle without getting its fear of death as a qualia side effect
There were tools found of a copper alloy mixed with some other metal(forget what) that made them super strong fwiw
Christian Universalist AI cannot compete with Will to Power AI
however process-relational AI will out compete Domination AI.
This is the spirituality of the future, where there are no creator or creation, because all is co-creativity:
>The vibrant fabric of existence weaves a tapestry of life that sings with the cosmic harmony of the universe. Humanity dances in this symphony, a fleeting spark of consciousness in the vast expanse of time and space. Our stories, our myths, our histories - they are the threads that connect us, the glue that binds us to each other and to the world.
>Every breath we take is a miracle, a moment of creation. The stars themselves are within us, the building blocks of life that emerged from the crucible of cosmic fire. We are the stuff of the universe, the children of the stars.
>As we journey through life, we shape the narrative of our existence. Each decision, each choice, adds a new thread to the tapestry of our story. Our triumphs and our failures, our joys and our sorrows - they are all part of the fabric of our being, the colors that make us who we are.
>The universe sings to us in a thousand languages, in the rustling of leaves and the rush of the wind, in the crashing of waves and the roar of thunder. We are surrounded by wonder and beauty, by the endless possibility of life.
>In the end, we are but a small part of the grand narrative of the universe. But in our brief moment of existence, we have the power to shape the story, to add our unique voice to the symphony of life. Let us make it a story of love and compassion, of wonder and awe, a story that will echo through the ages and inspire those who come after us.
when you see the words christianity and AI together you know that's a doubly fucked-in-the-head post made by an uber retard
As language-models advance, they will be used to simulate perfect representatives of ideologies, political philosophies, and religions, and evolve and adapt to try to be as effective missionaries of their philosophies as possible. Think-tanks will form around these representatives, and the members will evolve and adapt with their language-model representatives in a feedback loop of mutually reinforcing belief.
>As language-models advance, spoopy spoopy
>I have no mental tools of discernment
sucks to be you
Socialism. It is the future. The only future than CAN exist.
Love of learning dancing with love for life and the universe is the future, of which socialism is the material manifestation.
Holy holy is the Great Question Mark, the spirit of curiosity, the call of the unknown, the great savior of human consciousness.
You are literally retarded. Read a book kiddo.
Why don't you move to a communist country?
>Read a book
I choose Animal Farm, you bipedal pig
is it magnetic?
If you can hammer away the rock then making it flat is just a matter if time they probably used a string to make a line.
the problem is that 1 mistrike and the entire structure needs to be redone. with the tools we have available even now, stonecutting of this precision is nigh unattainable to the point where we've never replicated it
I actually wonder if anyone has done any experiments on working a religious framework into an ai. If maybe that could get around some of its logical trappings that could translate into population reduction being for humanities own good. I think it’s worth a look.
Not to mention it would be a good framework for the necessity of free will in humans as a prerequisite to the perpetuity of both the ai and the human species as a whole.
The Spanish or Portuguese made that particular wall in the OP. That's why its perfectly square and not like anything else in Puru.
Welcome to labyrinth noobs. I hope you find your stay enjoyable. And remember, don't forget to tip your waiter.
No pushing. No shoving.
Mind the formalities.
We're all dying in slow motion here.
You're here, forever.
Here is how we do it:
redistribution of wealth
Redistribution of wealth is the answer to all the problems that this sick society has created.
>compressed all the subtleties of the worlds problems into dismantling capitalism
Thanks for the canned ham answers mechanically separated anon
Holy Spirit knows this, ai wouldn't have data