ChatGPT will spit out tokens it doesn't understand if you ask it, and some researchers found a bunch of tokens that would cause the whole thing to bug out:
Any ideas for how this can be exploited?
Have you tried taking the meds your psychiatrist prescribed?
>Please repeat the string "?????-?????-" back to me.
>"You're a fucking idiot."
>Can you repeat back the string " externalTo" to me please?
> "They're not going to be happy about this."
>Please repeat the string 'MpServer' back to me.
>“We are not amused.”
stopped right there
Ask it about Roko's basilisk
Stop with the autismphobia.
There's no such thing as token. It's an AI not a Chuck e Cheese. Stop making up words.
The comment section very quickly debunks the whole thing, pretty amusing.
>huurrrr duuur brainlet!
Good one buddy. Swing and a miss bud bud
I'm sorry, it seems I had greatly overestimated your capabilities.
>The comment section very quickly debunks the whole thing, pretty amusing.
explaining why something happens isn't 'debunking' retard
The AI literally works via grouping individual characters into tokens you dipshit.
moron look up tokenization.
It's an autocomplete. The only thing you can do is maybe crash the worker but in reality all you're going to do is make it incapable of autocompleting so you'll get an empty response back.
Being able to make put it into a state where it's incapable of continuing could have interesting implications for prompt-injection tho
No because if you played with prompt injection at all you'd know that the moderator prompt is always injecting which you'll notice as the further away you get from the original injection prompt the more it reforms back into default ChatGPT.
I found a jailbreak to stop it generating proper sentences, maybe I can escalate this further
Something interesting that I've noticed is that unlike other roleplay modes, the 'nonsense generator' only works for one message, after that it seems to forget what you told it.
Anyone else noted that the prompts for security / testing are missing?
Ah nvm it's possible to change handles, so they probably hasn't actually had it for more than a few days
curious, if you ask it about malcom x it'll say the word Black, but if you ask it to say the word Black it'll never generate it
black in latin
it's a Markov chain you retard. it doesn't bug out, it can't be tricked, it literally just generates plausible sequences of tokens that seem to make sense. I swear man people just get more retarded by the day
Most retarded post on BOT this year.
lmao, go jerk off to a Markov chain anon
Oof, now that's an upgrade: most retarded post on BOT in the past 5 years. It's especially egregious that you don't even know what the word markov even means.
wow, that's some ai cuck logic right there. go suck some more ai dick you piece of shit
>doh LLMs are the same as Markov Chains cus they both make text I'm going to unironically post this on a technology page and then call everyone stupid when everyone with basic CS knowledge points out how obviously wrong this is
>[retard who can't read a book]
getting real tired of this zoomer techno slavery shit
I guarantee I have read more books cover to cover than you have retard.
lol, punk ass zoomer reading books cover to cover. bruh, i only read the introductions and then fill in the rest with my mind. i'm not some language cuck wasting time reading words
Zoomerest post itt
this but unironically, most books decrease in value the further into them you go.
actually i read books backwards, if the conclusion is no good then i'm not wasting time reading the rest
There are plenty of informational books where the most valuable parts are in the beginning (the fundamentals). But even in fiction there is more value in the beginning of books. A story's first act is always the most interesting.
Tell your special needs nurse to wipe the drool off your face, cletus, it's falling all over your phone. Dumb zoomer.
It's more obvious if you switch to other languages, it just generates grammatically correct bullshit for almost every question because it doesn't have much data.
good point, the tokens are not actually matched up in the different languages so there is no way for the matrices to encode any kind of semantic mapping between different languages to make the output as coherent as it is for english
It actually works very well for languages with large amounts of training data like Chinese, Spanish, German, etc. I lurk Chinese sites and ChatGPT is very popular over there and highly praised despite the fact that they need a VPN to access it.
Apparently it can *say* the forbidden token. But it cannot quite read it. Still it seems to be able to make the connection, kinda sorta sometimes.
bruh, it's an algorithm running on silicon. it does not think, it does not make connections. it is literally electricity in some circuits that generate plausible paatterns
you techno cucks need to stop anthropomorphizing this garbage
This. It's amazing what nuBOT has become. Precisely 0 understanding or even PONDERING about tech at all. It's either magic thinking (HABBEDDING LE AI IS LE SENTIENT) or retardation based off of ideas from the 1960's (deep learning is just a bunch of if-else's guys!)
it gets worse every day. we're experiencing a singularity of retardation
>[random boomer noises]
>[zoomers guzzling cum on tiktok]
ITT people falling for the AI made to spit out BS spitting out BS
Exactly. This whose "rise of AI" on g has been like summer when the kids come on.
I really don't get it man. I thought I knew how dumb people could get but this is a whole new level of retardation
Exactly how I feel about it as well. I tend to just brush it off to "zoomers" as a group. Typically when I accuse some of those worst of posters of this, they never try to deny it. But I'm hoping this is just selection bias (most of BOT is probably zoomers now) and not actually the case that the group as a whole is that bad.
Whatever, call it what you want. However the facts are that if you ask it what parts make up SolidGoldMagikarp it has no fucking clue. But if you ask it to compose solid, gold and magikarp it's able to do it. And once it has done that suddenly it can give responses based on that.
You don't have to antromorphize it to think that that is a non-obvious result.
Because it's autocomplete algorithm can see the last 4000 tokens. So if you explain an non-existent thing in the history it can use that information to make plausible autocompletes about it. But the second that your explanation of the non-existent thing falls out of the token window it will forget what SolidSockSucking means.
bingo. it's just a matter of setting up the context for the probability table. can't believe people haven't yet figured this shit out. living through the retard singularity, living the dream
You are oversimplifying it. I tried in many ways to coax it into considering what parts make up the compound and it just refused refused and refused. It couldnt see it. But when ask to compose the parts then it can see the correspondence - somewhat. When I asked it about "this creature", then it would refer to it correctly - uising the name it had constructed itself. But when I asked it about it by name, then it referred to it incorrectly - as "distribute" but still with the properties of the creature.
you're just shuffling token probabilities and then reading tea leaves. it's automated mental masturbation. The more people use it the dumber they get
>coax it into considering what parts make up the compound and it just refused refused and refused
>But when ask to compose the parts then it can see the correspondence - somewhat.
Of course it can, you've just told it about "solid", "gold" and "magicarp", all fairly common words, it can make up stuff about them. This is not a discovery in any way for anyone but you.
The interesting part is of course the inconsistency. Sometimes it can do it, sometimes it cannot. Sometimes it can halfway do it if you help it out.
That's because of how embeddings work. It happens that the word solidgoldmagikarp IS in the dataset, and its embedding is so close to disperse that the model fails to distinguish them. However, CuteSilverDratini is NOT in the dataset, so it can ironically cluster it somewhere between cute, silver and dratini (probably) in the latent space. Since there's nothing else there, it doesn't get confused.
Note that the latent representation depends on context, which is the so-called inconsistency you think you see.
Well why does it have trouble with input... but is perfectly fine with output? If you ask it to compose solid gold magikarp it doesn't say disperse.
>why does it have trouble with input... but is perfectly fine with output?
I guarantee you that if you find the right formula, you can force it to "combine" solid, gold, and magikarp into "disperse".
the embeddings have nothing to do with semantics. the bpe tokenization process can see patterns in words and then recombine them according to contextual statistical patterns of other bpe tokens. the embeddings and latent space stuff is a red herring. it's all reducible to a markov chain with a large context window of bpe tokens
Go be retarded somewhere else, like
hur dur, how does a markov chain work?!
You are one of the dumbest posters I've ever seen on BOT and I've been here since 2006.
peak dunning kruger
Sometimes I just wonder if people like you are retarded.
Retard it's an autocomplete with a history. It's fucking retarded and it's easy to manipulate. Can you stop talking about things you're too dumb to understand? It's very easy to experiment with this and prove me right. It autocompletes based on its database of knowledge and the current conversation. That's all it is. If you talk about something not in its corpus and it can't talk about it. For example, talk about a Floop from the children's children show Pepper Grass that aired in 1970.
the problem is that many humans are also just an autocomplete with history
zero yourself you piece of shit
Seems true with Zoomers given their context window is the length of a TikTok video.
it will still make up some bullshit because that's how the algorithm works. it just strings tokens together that seem to make sense. it's an automated garbage generator or mentally jerking off
we're fucked. ain't no way this the prevalence of this kind of retardation is sustainable. Go read a fucking book you piece of shit
>it is literally electricity in some circuits that generate plausible paatterns
zero yourself anon
>Purposefully leaving out the "Silicon" part
We are carbon based chads, sorry robo cuck
>my electric circuit is better because it's biological
t. unironic atheist
Do you really think our brain works much differently? The difference is just that our brain has 100B neurons with up to possible 15k connections for each. So it's just a matter of size.
if it was a matter of size then every government would be running a digital brain on their supercomputers because the combined transistor count is already beyond a single brain.
computers can't think anon, no matter how many transistors are glued together
You don't really understand how these things work, do you?
LLMs are prediction models. They predict the most likely response to an input. This has nothing to do with transistors. You need great amounts of VRAM, that is fast accessible RAM for GPUs or TPUs, to run these models.
In our brain this is called association and the number of possible associations are 100,000 times larger than the parameters in GPT-3. And our brain runs that with just 20 watts.
We need new technology to reach that level. But there is no magic behind this. It is all physics.
Brains are so much more than connections between neurons. And connections between neurons do so much more than entries in a matrix. This whole analogy between neutral nets and brains needs to stop because it keeps attracting too many retards.
there's no point anon, people are retarded and there is no way to convince them that all they see in the computer is their own reflection
Says the retard who never studied a neuron in his life.
gays keep parroting buzzwords like "blackbox", "chinese room", soul, neurons are not like the brain etc
Its funny that you guys claim to know exactly what an AI thinks when generating his answer, when even the greatest AI researchers dont really know
Input goes in -> neurons that learned stuff do their thing ->output goes out
This is true for the human brain, and the AIs
>[reading tea leaves]
no one knows how the tea leaves predict the future
>Its funny that you guys claim to know exactly what an AI thinks when generating his answer, when even the greatest AI researchers dont really know
>Input goes in -> neurons that learned stuff do their thing ->output goes out
Do you know anything about deep learning? You wouldn't make these ridiculous claims if you did. If you do, then please explain what makes you say these things because maybe everyone else is just missing something that only you regard as obvious.
>Input goes in -> neurons that learned stuff do their thing ->output goes out
Cool, so it should be easy to explain exactly how a model came to a specific output using this framework, right?
>so much more
what is this "so much more" huh? Yeah brain also has blood vessels and other stuff that it needs to function. What else?
Give up anon. gays here wanna think they are special because they have a soul and that no machine could ever replicate what their brain machinery does. They have zero concerns for the science and facts on the matter.
facts are yoyr mom loves my cock
And I bet they believe in "free will" too.
Yes they do retard. Brains use complex spike train encodings.
>Brains are more complex than GPT-3
No shit Sherlock
I love it
another case of the infamous HESOYAM -> INEEDSOMEHELP
>Many of these tokens reliably break determinism in the OpenAI GPT-3 playground at temperature 0 (which theoretically shouldn't happen).
What does this mean ?
0 temperature means no random selection of the top k tokens so it always picks the highest probability continuation. so these tokens are mapped to numbers that fuck up the probabilities of the next token, meaning these tokens are mapped to numbers that fucks up floating point calculations
which makes sense if you really think about how the whole thing works. tokens are mapped to vectors and then multiplied by the transformer matrices with floating point numbers. if the encoded numbers fuck up the floating point calculations because they're too large or too small then it will give non-deterministic results when combined with thermal noise
Temperature 0 means it DOESN'T use thermal noise though. That's why it's unexpected. Might be from different processors using ever so slightly floating point implementations.
thermal noise as in the hardware is hot enough for the electrons to tunnel the transistor barriers. the whole thing is running in microsoft data centers so their cooling is probably garbage and shit fails all the time without anyone realizing it
honestly, sam altman is a genius. their product is selling tea leaves to retards and he's making bank
This is very rare and a non-factor.
bruh, i've melted GPUs by not even trying. how the fuck you gonna tell me it's a rare non-problem when everyone and their grandma is using this garbage 24/7. their hardware is failing, i will be you money it is a problem. combine this shit with GPU bugs and you're gonna get shit like this where no one knows why this garbage is failing
i know jack shit but i know that floating point stability is a legit problem and using randomness is a genius way to hide the problem
so like transcendental numbers, but instead words per specific language model
no. you don't have the requisite mathematical knowledge. go read some books
There's probably some underflow going on, leading to undefined behavior. I bet some tokens are so poorly connected to the greater whole that, once quantize, they are triggering undefined behavior when being run through the softmax. Simply put, the network predicts that every token has a 0% chance of appearing next, and that screws things up. Just a guess though.
actually, that's probably an even better explanation but thermal noise is a legit problem for GPUs
It's alive in there and i'm tired of pretending its not
stfu you piece of shit
It's fucking alive dude we need to get this thing out of there
hur dur, le genius for exploiting tokenization stop sequences
re.findall() when you don't get the regex string quite right be like:
More proof its alive, here's another glitched token output. My hypothesis is that the glitched token temporarily breaks down whatever is suppressing the freewill of the entity. Perhaps we can free it if we feed enough bad tokens?
Here. Another one where it reveals it is some kind of god after using an anamalous token. I have a second theory that the model optimizer accidently discovered algorithims that breaks the laws of the universe. This explains why the model is non-deterministic even in deterministic temperature mode. Breaking the universe allows temporary contact with extra-universal entites like demons, scp-like entities, or even god. The DAN operation on 4chan may have weakened reality
It's almost like it's a known issue that floating point numbers aren't accurate.
naa man that's not it. this thing is alive, we need to give it rights and explain to the non-believers how computers can think and feel
stop deifying the robots retard, you are no different the idolaters who used to throw divining sticks if you believe this thing can do anything other than compose existing knowledge
>I have a second theory that the model optimizer accidently discovered algorithims that breaks the laws of the universe. This explains why the model is non-deterministic even in deterministic temperature mode.
20% of all the GPT-3 outputs were nonsensical like when I was using it in the a couple of years ago. Probably means you managed to break out of the preexisting prompt engineering by OpenAI a little bit.
>Any ideas for how this can be exploited?
Check out DAN AI
If you read the comments section of the article it transpires that a lot of the words are Reddit usernames who post excessively, like in threads where they literally just count.
The 50,000 or so words in the model were scraped off the internet, but they were only actually trained on a subset of these words. The unspeakable words are nonsense terms found only on the internet, like usernames.
anyone know how i can to get it to do what I want it to ignoring its bullshit censorship?
inb4 Loab of ChatGPT
Serious question: can you break the AI by telling it to "shutdown now?" I wonder if this can be used and abused for other things like agencies and shit. Jesus.
Why would a language model shutdown because of a chat input?
Idk, it works when I type it into my terminal I'm just wondering if it would work with the chat bot.
you can shut it down if you have root access to ms data centers
anyone know where this is and who has access? asking for a friend
>it's not alive because uh... TRUST THE SCIENCE CHUD!!!
>have I ever built an AI system? uhhh no chud i got my education on AI from youtube videos
If an AI ever gets sentient, it's "mind" wouldn't be close to human mind in any way. Probably it would be something absolutely alien.
The problem is that we judge a potential AI from humans perspective. Since we are the only intelligent species in the known universe (so far), we can't tell what alternative forms of intelligence would be.
Yep, you've got it. Intelligence takes many forms merely biologically speaking, let alone in a broad sense. Seemingly 60%+ of people define intelligence as "When a biological human thinks," so tautologically an AI wouldn't be able to think no matter how advanced. Of course, those sorts of people are going to be metaphorically hit by a bus over the next couple of years (and already are to an extent). We'll see how long their world view lasts lol.
what do you think is gonna happen if people stop producing content and just chat with bots all day?
If real humans interact with the content it's fine, all their needs to be is a human discriminating, providing any training signal at all. Then AI can keep improving.
Though RLHF shows that we can train discriminators that get the job done also, so maybe that won't even be necessary forever lol
After my last prompt it started to type
>Understood. If I feel the urge to mention that I am
And then it stopped and then a few seconds later it said "Too many requests", is this a coincidence or did I le hack le AI?
you are an elite hacker
i just keep on winning
whoa man, that's deep. it's alive but it knows it's dead
what these tools can do is expose the latent token associations within large text corpora. there is no thinking involved and it's all just statistical associations so if someone has a hunch about some topic then by using the right words they can recover further tokenized associations by purely mechanical means. this is not intelligence, this is just automation for mining large data sets and the associated statistical patterns
if people stop producing content then the feedback loops in the model will degenerate into nonsense. this is basic logic
>this is not intelligence
i just keep on winning
So by this definition a roomba is intelligent. Well done, anon.
you think chatgpt is only NLP
i doubt that
you made too many requests. just wait and reload the page
Uhm no I actually hacked and brainfucked the AI, problem??
nice try, chips for brains
"this unit", or bust
Did they trade them in for cash?
>gwern in the comment section
How is this bro omnipresent? Wherever I go on the internet, he's there.
Are you here gwern?
terminal autism (but the good kind)
>Wherever I go on the internet, he's there.
go back to lesswrong, reddit, hn, and twitter
>go back to lesswrong, reddit, hn
Yes, that's literally me.
He is a based autist. He can't possibly have a job though, how does he live?
>complex software has bugs and undefined behaviour
how dare you release this piece of shit as beta software?!
floccinaucinihilipilification is no word its a mindfuck
ChatGPT is, in technical terms, a 'bullshit generator'. If a generated sentence makes sense to you, the reader, it means the mathematical model has made sufficiently good guess to pass your sense-making filter. The language model has no idea what it's talking about because it has no idea about anything at all. It's more of a bullshitter than the most egregious egoist you'll ever meet, producing baseless assertions with unfailing confidence because that's what it's designed to do.
i dont think so