ChatGPT Failing at Math

ChatGPT Failing at Math

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >e a large number
      It's literally less than tree fiddy.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is it really AI?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's not intelligent. It's like someone writing a test and they don't know the answer to a question. But they try to spit out enough half-truths to get partial marks.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's pretty good when the big complaint is that it sometimes sounds like an uninformed human (rather than not sounding human at all).

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_V._Shaney
          we've been able to do this since the fricking 1980s

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Is it really AI?
      You are asking the right questions.
      It is AI that has been SUPPLEMENTED by a large pool of dedicated human respondents, to help the company show off the supposed intelligence of it's AI.
      ChatGPT is, strictly speaking, a fraud.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's in the field known as AI. It itself is not intelligent. Neither is anything in AI. True intelligence is still a faraway dream.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI is a relative term that we use to describe anything a computer does that is thought of to require human intelligence

      Anything is AI if you’re stupid enough

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    99% of humans can't answer that. Keep moving the goalposts all you want. We've created intelligence.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >we
      homie who exactly is "we"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Quoting Wikipedia is intelligence.
      You accidentally just revealed a lot about yourself.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >The midwit wordcel program is a midwit wordcel

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How long until chatbots put research assistants out of a job? Are we close to being able to ask the computer to generate a lit review and a bibtex file of sources on a given topic?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There is no way this thing is even close to being able to produce research level responses.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Very long. You will always have to check the validity of the generated text, especially for technical topics. And you can't do this if you don't already understand the topic. Being able to press a button and get something mistake free will take a while.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >You will always have to check the validity of the generated text, especially for technical topics. And you can't do this if you don't already understand the topic. Being able to press a button and get something mistake free will take a while.
        Try asking it to output something in Coq.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://github.com/clarus/falso
          >COQ
          PROOF
          >OF
          FALSE
          A
          L
          S
          O
          O
          O

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            IT WAS FIXED
            Black person.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >ask for Coq proof of Riemann
          >output gets run through Coq and the error message piped back to ChatGPT, requesting a new version
          >new version back into Coq
          >repeat
          PROFIT???

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Are we close to being able to ask the computer to generate a lit review and a bibtex file of sources on a given topic?
      No because it's incapable of understanding anything.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >OpenAI
    >you need to log in
    >It's not open

    no thank you

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    this is a question an undergraduate 1st year math student should be able to answer easily.

    It's inability to find the answer was because it was unable to recognize that the boundary needs to be created using at least 3 vertices and edges.

    Next you need to think about how the edges are counted on the boundary, this is at most 2 * the number of edges.

    Do do some algebra on euler's formula and you arrive at the number of edges is less than or equal to 3 * vertices - 6

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I really, really hope you're baiting. The question in OP's image is nonsensical. Euler's formula has absolutely no possible application to graph theory.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    there seems to be this problem as to where the boundary between
    - recognizing when two sets are the same
    - recognizing when two unary conditions (i.e. classes) are the same
    - recognizing when two philosophical concepts are the same (??? lol idk I'm just a dog, where's my beer)
    is, and why the frick would you tell a fricking database any of that
    like
    - go post on plebbit
    - go write for
    >le philosophical journals to enable you to earn
    >>la glorie
    throughout
    >le ages
    FRICKING GO TO bot AND READ A FRICKING THREAD

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      more than that
      you have to consider that math and philosophy might have competing ideas as to how to organize this idea that when you have more axioms, you have more ways of proving that two things are different
      for example in ZFC there seem to be "too many ways" to prove that things are different because infinite sets that cannot be exhausted by enumeration seem illogical and absurd
      the issue is that "naturally" people think the only real numbers are real numbers that have digits that can be calculated or generated by an algorithm
      however the problem is that people inject their real world experience into the abstract realm
      i.e. they think that when things exist in the real world, they exist in mathematics
      however the real world isn't an axiomatic system, and modern math is

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what is the answer?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *