Chat GPT can now decode all redacted documents

Someone fed a partially redacted NSA document on UFOs into ChatGPT and it was able to decode the redacted portion.

This is huge. From now on there will be almost no redacted documents. The government will have to release the entire document or keep it entirely secret.

Anyone with even the slightest interest in such documents needs to begin feeding as many of them as you can into chat GPT before the Glowies shut it down!

https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1710397599474458818

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >it was able to decode the redacted portion.
    Yeah, no, Probably not
    AI-tards are the dumbest fricks alive I swear

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    they already would've shut it down if it actually meant something

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I seriously hope nobody actually believes this. It doesn't "decode" anything it just makes stuff up.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      No anon, it can see through the blacked out censored parts and is unredacting them. It definitely isn't just filling in the missing text with what it "thinks" might follow the text before that based on its training in text completion.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >being this moronicly literal by eating the bait so fast he shit it out undigested
        you definitely have a video of eye contact practice saved don't you?

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          this moronicly literal by eating the bait so fast he shit it out undigested
          The only one who did that is you
          >you definitely have a video of eye contact practice saved don't you?
          This is so highly specific it is 100% projection. Why don't you leave this thread, mouthbreather sperg

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        If that's true then programs could have done it for decades, you really think they missed this possibility?

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >[the region we would like to inform that we are]
    hehe okay bro

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    kek this is just rearranging what we already know, literally what AI does too

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hiya, data scientist/Machine learning engineer here:

    AI isnt 'decoding' anything here. Its basicsllh predicting the most likely words to follow. It isnt decoding anything. It basically looks at the words that came before the redacted sements and after, and uses the most likely word that would fit between.

    Its great for sparking imagination, but it cant be taken as fact.

  8. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Half of these aren't even coherent sentences

  9. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >VARIOUS UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS IN [THE REGION WE WOULD LIKE TO INFORM THAT WE ARE]
    fricking lmao

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sir, sir.. please to hang on a moment sir as we are addressing this presently sir if you would just wait for a moment and thank you sir.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Holy shit, government btfo. We unredacted it.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      someone paid for a blue tick then tweeted about this like it was something kek

  10. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Good morning sirs, AI-jeets

  11. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I want to see what it says about aliens being underwater humans that evolved differently than we did

  12. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >decode
    You are a braindead fricking idiot and I'm sure a Markov Chain Generator would look like magic to you. I could fricking "decode" this document in 30 minutes with nothing but python 3 and a couple glowie source docs.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >python 3 and a couple glowie source docs.
      if you had source docs it'd probably do a better job lol

  13. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'd guess it just fills the gaps with what it deems to be most probable in the given context, but it's guessed content in that scenario.

  14. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    ok, but can you post more? you've managed to get the shills mad, so now you've got to post more images

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >shills mad
      I think you mean some anons took the bait and said his stupid it was.
      Personally I just automatic writing to fill in any gaps.

  15. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >NASA documents
    ... and more bluebeam psyop from the spacenazis ...

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *