can u really ban ai art off of the internet? Posted on December 27, 2022 by Anonymous can u really ban ai art off of the internet?
Not really. You could stop most of it by just not giving people access to the free services for it that are out now.
Too late for that now thanks to stable diffusion
These artists are dumb af. These "AIs" are just tools
They can totally use the generative models as their own tool and feed their works to it and create something even more incredible.
Have any examples? lol
That would reveal my identity.
I'd suggest you assemble artworks of an artist you like (with their permission 1st). And use generative models (SOTAs are the diffusion ones). Based on the math, trained model should give acceptable result for each random input (and constraints)
>with their permission 1st
No, I don't think I will do that first. Thanks for the idea though.
Who said you need permission, posting art publicly on the internet is essentially implied consent.
It only gets sketchy when you make money out of it. But for fun, or to post? No problems as far as I can see
>It only gets sketchy when you make money out of it.
Do you think these companies are scraping and tagging billions of images, improving AI and training for months with no intent to monetize it in the future? Are you genuinely retarded? They WILL be making money, and a lot of it.
No, because in this case you will have to ban open source code as well.
No one who matters cares. Plus pandoras box is already open, the tech is out there, no way to stop it now.
there is one way to stop it
>Plus pandoras box is already open, the tech is out there, no way to stop it now.
if you don't have the data sets for your machine language algo then you're screwed. people aren't building their own, they're using what ever is online. building such data sets is extremely time and bandwidth consuming exercise. the future is selling these data sets to people, which will be heavily filtered or crippled.
it's already too late SD 2.0 is already censored
the future is businesses training their own for internal purposes, like Disney
selling to end users is small time
I have a feeling that an open source community will try to maintain a generic training model that will get updated periodically
No but they could set up art websites where AI art is banned. Hard to police but they could make it so you can only upload once a day to stop spam at least.
The witch hunting is already starting with people in 'AI-free spaces' constantly accusing others of posting AI art.
It's like they're collectively losing their minds and having a meltdown.
it's easily solvable with artists presenting photos / proof of work. usually how it works in various other digital art scenes because they're used to phony art being passed off as original work (like photos taken off of the internet). proof matters, so these artists share how the image progressed. not all do this but those that do are true artists.
i tried warning you gmorons that would happen with the image generator that was posted here for ages. they crippled that in a matter of weeks. sad shit.
Inpainting can do WIP progression. It's unironically peak paranoia.
sure it can! it any format imaginable, right? my sides. no, you have no idea how any of this works. i'm most certain your moron iq is so low that when you talk to a chat bot, you think it's sentient.
>proof of work
This is the solution.
>Inpainting can do WIP progression
No it doesn't.
Proof of work is frequently a sped-up screen capture of the artist drawing. And it can include the artist hand on the drawing tablet.
thats good, ai gays need to burn. Humans only, no ais and their prompt cucks
ai = digital pollution
ai art is garbage and yet you still can't compete with trash, lmao
all that power of ai and you still can't get laid
>arguing with holes
have you not seen the amount of art humans just naturally shit out that appears on a daily basis? it's a tremendous amount. and people think a computer, that's taking very same river of vomit and doing something else with it, is a problem? no. it has its uses. what people are mad about are talentless gays trying to pass off computer algo generated art as original work.
ok so why do we need more? more made by a machine that is meaningless?
we are waist deep in shit why do we need to be neck deep?
This d e s u
We will wish we could have deviantart back one day
art gays couldnt reliably ban tracing and photo filters
you think they can ban ai?
unless ai art started doing the printer hidden watermark technique its impossible to tell whats what
Dr. Kaczynski, I'm FBI.
Uncle Ted's here for the weekend!
i have a hard time believing this guy couldnt bag bitches
hes easily 8/10 imo
>can u really ban X off of the internet?
why does she know how to make a virgin? i thought it would've been the other way around.
the joke is that the bartender heard it as "can you make [the drink], virgin?" to which she replies "yes, i know how to make [the drink]" and cries because she though she was being called a virgin, even though there's literally nothing wrong with a woman being a virgin
The response is s subtle joke.
you can, but you can't implement it without doing some really hard stuff that makes it just not worth doing it.
anyway artist dont have the power to do anything,
at worst artist will stop sharing their art or hide it behind paywall, which will popularize more ai art.
this is like when machines started to do handwork and people complained that they were losing their jobs,
You can't ban the tools nor the services, but web landlords can disallow AI generated content on their platform. Moderation is already a thing, my friend. Automated moderation too.