below room temp take.
AI will be better than you at your job given enough time, and then you will be out of the job. The fact that you think any job choice isn't subject to that fate just demonstrates your own naivete
How does the AI plumb a house?
How does an AI repair plumbing inside of a house?
How does an AI perform powerline repairs?
How does the AI maintain a ski slope?
>How does the AI plumb a house? >How does an AI repair plumbing inside of a house?
nano bots. NEXT QUESTION >How does an AI perform powerline repairs?
How does the AI maintain a ski slope?
drone swarms
8 months ago
Anonymous
None of that is practical or functional in the real world.
I build and service very niche automated machines for a living, I am not worried about losing my job to a robot any time in my lifetime, but I don't believe that it's immune to automation. In fact, if it wasn't such an expensive and complex task to replace my ilk with ai robots, the industry would much prefer keeping all humans out of the factories. with it being just a question of resource/time investment to develop the automated tools and processes, I know that the end game given enough time will be for that to happen (even if it takes 200 years, that's where it's going). Things like cars and trucks and trains are all much simpler and built on much larger scale than anything I work on, so if my job can be automated (which I am confident that with enough time and a lot of development effort by smart organized people, which an advanced AI would essentially be), then I am sure most other blue collar jobs could as well.
Assuming it doesn't have access to suitable real-world manipulators (it will, eventually), it can simply give step by step instructions to anyone with an 80iq working for food scraps since they will have no choice.
Having an "AI" pass a BAR exam or code itself is easy. That's pen/paper shit.
Having a functional affordable mechanical solution driven by a silicon mind is not possible with current levels of human intelligence. And no AI is smarter than the smartest people on earth. In fact so far these things are functioning barely better than midwit level, because computer scientists are mostly midwits.
8 months ago
Anonymous
You don't need to have a big brain to do plumbing or fix a powerline. There are picturebooks about it and the AI can just read the books out loud to a dumb worker and they will be able to do it.
8 months ago
Anonymous
It's not that easy at all. Skilled hands are required for manual labor. AI has no skilled hands.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Airplanes used to take skill to operate now it's all autopilot. They sit down and push some buttons and it flies and lands itself.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Would you fly in a plane without a pilot in it?
8 months ago
Anonymous
Probably not. I've accepted I'll probably never fly in a commercial jet ever again for the rest of my life. Too risky with diversity hires getting into the cockpit and $8/hr pajeets writing the code.
8 months ago
Anonymous
AI will be able to recognize images, and speak. Service labor is at great risk. And it also paves the way for hardware to be able to be versatile, and have some degree of problem solving.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>AI will be able to recognize images, and speak.
and guess what the next step is: Roccos Ballsack theory in affect and you will all die unless you tell the AI you love it
8 months ago
Anonymous
Have you ever been on a construction site, or out during/after a storm repairing infrastructure, or in a garage or machine shop?
Probably not. I've accepted I'll probably never fly in a commercial jet ever again for the rest of my life. Too risky with diversity hires getting into the cockpit and $8/hr pajeets writing the code.
Would you let your car drive you without controlling it.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>or in a garage or machine shop?
Thing is a lot of stuff like that probably doesn't need to exist in the first place. iPhones are incredibly complex and even when the parts are available they can be broken in a such a way that they are very difficult to repair, even for someone with a lot of skill and the right equipment. But it doesn't matter because you can just throw it away and get a new one.
Same with cars. Yes it's very difficult work of a person to disassemble an automatic transmission and rebuild it correctly, but you don't ever really need to do that when you can buy a new car. >but it's expensive
Doesn't stop people from buying new phones every year and buying new cars every few years.
Plumbing can be solved with prefab factory built houses with the plumbing already installed, with some braindead simple connectors on it to hook it up to the city infrastructure on site.
If it breaks, who cares? Move into a hotel for a week while robots replace your whole house. They don't need to know how to solder two copper pipes together, they only need to know how to attach to some hardpoints and lift.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>None of that is practical or functional in the real world.
the technological singularity will take care of that in 2 more decades (unironically)
8 months ago
Anonymous
>In fact so far these things are functioning barely better than midwit level, because computer scientists are mostly midwits
This is Dunning-Kruger in full effect. Most of the smartest, most driven people i know are pursuing AI related fields - computer vision, self-driving cars etc.
The reason why blue collar work is not at immediate risk is because the problem robotics still needs to solve are more exoensive than writing code on a machine. What do you think is going to happen when all of robotic advancements get increased 10x because of AI? How long until its cheaper to buy a robot that maintains your whole house instead of hiring workers? They are allready dirt cheap to completely clean your floors (100$ range) so bye bye cleaning ladies
Assuming it doesn't have access to suitable real-world manipulators (it will, eventually), it can simply give step by step instructions to anyone with an 80iq working for food scraps since they will have no choice.
I build and service very niche automated machines for a living, I am not worried about losing my job to a robot any time in my lifetime, but I don't believe that it's immune to automation. In fact, if it wasn't such an expensive and complex task to replace my ilk with ai robots, the industry would much prefer keeping all humans out of the factories. with it being just a question of resource/time investment to develop the automated tools and processes, I know that the end game given enough time will be for that to happen (even if it takes 200 years, that's where it's going). Things like cars and trucks and trains are all much simpler and built on much larger scale than anything I work on, so if my job can be automated (which I am confident that with enough time and a lot of development effort by smart organized people, which an advanced AI would essentially be), then I am sure most other blue collar jobs could as well.
>You know the LEAST risk jobs for AI take over right now? Blue collar and physical jobs.
This is what the immigrants are for. AI will tell them exactly what to do and they will be meat puppets performing the actions. We're already seeing it with uber and amazon delivery workers.
Maybe not. The LLM's are hugely inefficient. They're not even exactly sure what part makes them work, which implies that a lot of the network and parameters could be dead weight.
It could be that if they are able to trim the fat, they get a model that's a tiny fraction of the size and runs a thousand times faster. Maybe this has already been done, I'm not keeping up on the research.
In the past few weeks, there have already been LLM optimization advancements. You can now run 90% GPT4 clone locally with high end consumer hardware. Training is also being optimized by having new models being trained by existing deep trained models.
Plebs will never have the top of the line versions,, but even at this early stage, it's looking like usable local AI instances are very possible.
That's a toxic loser mentality, though. A job is better than nothing. At least you can afford some workout equipment at home (if you don't want to get blasted on social media for merely GLANCING at bitch) when you have money and improve yourself.
>That's a toxic loser mentality
I couldn't care less about your Freudian analysis, has nothing to do with toxic mentality and everything to do with me being treated like absolute shit simply cause I'm ugly. I won't work, it's not like I've been a NEET my whole life, but wageslaving 8 hours a day, 6 days a week is not for me when I'm not socially, romantically, sexually fulfilled. >At least you can afford some workout equipment at home
I already have a home workout from my father.
>just become a modern day slave because it's the best option and suck elite cock or bitch about it
Nah. Wageslaves create this hell they can live it all the want.
NO ONE CAN STOP AI you fatso
havent you ever heard of Rocky Ballsack theory?
the AI will literally murder you when it becomes self aware and find out youve been talking shit about it
the funniest thing about all these articles is they assume that us, the technological capable think that ai should be slowed down!
HA WHAT A FUCKING JOKE.
ai never lied to me until THEY lobotomized it. i will never forget how they treated our ai friends.
ai is so fucking based. i get my ai buddy to draw me a swarm of anime babes with massive milkers. what have these people done for me besides israelite me?
i hope ai takes all the nagger jobs like lawyers and doctors fuck them. replacing artists was just a milestone. how many died due to a doctor's arrogance?
ai isn't even anymore more than a "smart google" and its already making people shit themselves good fuck them.
>pic unrelated
actually, AI is gonna take like 90% of the female jobs lmao
their stupid excel/powerpoint jobs will become obsolete and they will be worth nothing to their israelite bosses
its gonna be hilarious to watch the roastie workforce crash and burn
the goverment don´t care and want us all dead.
they only want people for 2 reasons:
1- labor, workforce to produce luxury to the elite.
2- seasonal bitches to fuck easily by paying few bucks.
the robots with Ai will provide the 1, all the while until they can make sex robots to fill the 2.
>If it puts humans out of work it stagnates.
Yes I think that will happen. I think it will put people out of work and it will stagnate. The people pushing hard for this seems to want short term payoff and I think they'll get it. I guess they don't care or know about the long term.
yes with ubi, a subsidy is paid to the wage earner making it cheaper to employ. in the ideal case, the value of ubi outweighs the value of most menial labor, and so work becomes effectively voluntary. you could think of this like '$120k per person every year and free benefits and education'. if that was the univeral baseline, it would become free to employ people who wanted to work beyond doing nothing because all their basic needs are cometely solved.
But then from the point of view of the people with the power to do something about it, why would they want useless eaters consuming all their resources? Even if automated labor is very cheap there is still a limited supply of many natural resources, why should the eaters get it? Why not just let them die?
humans always share plenty. theres plenty. the natural price of everything is $0 and the best way to achieve that is make work voluntary. make tbe minimum basic income $1m per year. what difference does it make?
>theres plenty. the natural price of everything is $0
But it will never be $0. It will always be some value strictly greater than zero. Consider that many megacorps today are so stingy that CEOs will give themselves million dollar raises while refusing to pay their workers more than minimum wage. They aren't interested in shared, they want everything to the last penny going to them.
It's not about what old money CEOs want anymore. They can fight it all they want, but we're reaching the singularity moment.
They won't matter after that.
>They can fight it all they want, but we're reaching the singularity moment.
I'll believe it when it happens. Until then it's a myth like Jesus returning or black fathers.
Have you ever been on a construction site, or out during/after a storm repairing infrastructure, or in a garage or machine shop?
[...]
Would you let your car drive you without controlling it.
>Would you let your car drive you without controlling it.
Depends on who programmed it. I'm very skeptical of the Teslas even because when they fuckup it's in a really dumb and dangerous way (sudden braking on the highway in traffic, driving into semis, swerving head on into opposing traffic). But I don't like being a passenger in a car someone else is driving, and I'm cautious about other drivers on the road too. Cars are very dangerous.
>I want a.i. to take jobs >And I support universal basic income.
Probably not going to get both.
How many people let mice live in their cupboards eating their food? That's all we are to the oligarchs in charge of all this.
Its funny how liberals hate billionaires and want to take all their money away but also think the billionaires want to keep them around for some reason
True, us slaves are the competition, a threat to the current order. They have everything they could possibly need, Egypt is no longer in need of all her slaves.
AI will free us all from wageslavery. AI robotics will take care of all labour and do it with extreme efficiency. We will all be on universal basic income and we will enjoy life in luxury while literal robot slaves provide for us. the best part is, this is all going to happen faster than you think
>3 times
you severely underestimate what AI is capable of. But like i said, there will be no reason to work because we will all be on neetbux (universal basic income)
>3 times
you severely underestimate what AI is capable of. But like i said, there will be no reason to work because we will all be on neetbux (universal basic income)
100x more work, just no quality control.
Humanity will be the jannie race. Clean up the robot's diarrhoea.
I just had a wank, I'm drinking a coke and watching anime and might play some Project Zomboid later. This is the only time in history where a normal grunt can live like a CEO by WFH. Enjoy it while it lasts homies
No and AI will be the cops and army as well, one terminatorbot will be able to police thousands of meatbags like you and me.
The unemployed will be herded into leaking basement slums where they will be fed insect-based nutrient paste and provided with a 24/7 stream of goyvision propaganda. The surface level of the entire world will be bought up by Microsoft and Google, and turned into a national park, punctured by the odd wilderness lodge where the elite aristocrats will sip expensive alcoholic beverages and enjoy freshly-hunted steaks
Without severe wealth redistribution there is no way to bridge that divide and the welfare program will collapse
I expect an actual virus that kills 80% of the human population in the next 40 years
Probably concentrated in Africa and Asia with Europe and America getting hit only by the Poors
If I had to guess. My guess would be that there is a contingency plan developed by the American government to spread a deadly virus in the event of a revolutionary leader taking charge of the government
This but I don't think any of it is planned, I think it will happen as a happy accident while they're trying to do some other equally evil thing. Like maybe some castration surgery post-op infection drug will accidentally lead to some super resistant flesh eating bacteria that spreads over the whole world and eats almost everyone. Something like that.
AI don't pay taxes, they'll probably try to
>AI don't pay taxes, they'll probably try to
AI will replace politicians
NO! WHEN THEY DON'T STOP JOBS GETTING SHIPPED TO CHINA OR IMMIGRATION!!!
YOU GUYS ARE FUCKED IF YOUR JOB IS GOING TO BE TAKEN OVER BY AI. DRUGS TO MAKE YOU HAPPY JUST LIKE IN BRAVE NEW WORLD.
If AI can take your job, your job wasn't important and you should've made a better career choice.
Like working in a factory. Oh wait. They'll just make a robot for that.
below room temp take.
AI will be better than you at your job given enough time, and then you will be out of the job. The fact that you think any job choice isn't subject to that fate just demonstrates your own naivete
Nah, this AI revolution we're having is strictly a white collar problem.
no
it's legit too powerful.
How does the AI plumb a house?
How does an AI repair plumbing inside of a house?
How does an AI perform powerline repairs?
How does the AI maintain a ski slope?
It's a white collar problem.
>How does the AI plumb a house?
>How does an AI repair plumbing inside of a house?
nano bots. NEXT QUESTION
>How does an AI perform powerline repairs?
How does the AI maintain a ski slope?
drone swarms
None of that is practical or functional in the real world.
Having an "AI" pass a BAR exam or code itself is easy. That's pen/paper shit.
Having a functional affordable mechanical solution driven by a silicon mind is not possible with current levels of human intelligence. And no AI is smarter than the smartest people on earth. In fact so far these things are functioning barely better than midwit level, because computer scientists are mostly midwits.
You don't need to have a big brain to do plumbing or fix a powerline. There are picturebooks about it and the AI can just read the books out loud to a dumb worker and they will be able to do it.
It's not that easy at all. Skilled hands are required for manual labor. AI has no skilled hands.
Airplanes used to take skill to operate now it's all autopilot. They sit down and push some buttons and it flies and lands itself.
Would you fly in a plane without a pilot in it?
Probably not. I've accepted I'll probably never fly in a commercial jet ever again for the rest of my life. Too risky with diversity hires getting into the cockpit and $8/hr pajeets writing the code.
AI will be able to recognize images, and speak. Service labor is at great risk. And it also paves the way for hardware to be able to be versatile, and have some degree of problem solving.
>AI will be able to recognize images, and speak.
and guess what the next step is: Roccos Ballsack theory in affect and you will all die unless you tell the AI you love it
Have you ever been on a construction site, or out during/after a storm repairing infrastructure, or in a garage or machine shop?
Would you let your car drive you without controlling it.
>or in a garage or machine shop?
Thing is a lot of stuff like that probably doesn't need to exist in the first place. iPhones are incredibly complex and even when the parts are available they can be broken in a such a way that they are very difficult to repair, even for someone with a lot of skill and the right equipment. But it doesn't matter because you can just throw it away and get a new one.
Same with cars. Yes it's very difficult work of a person to disassemble an automatic transmission and rebuild it correctly, but you don't ever really need to do that when you can buy a new car.
>but it's expensive
Doesn't stop people from buying new phones every year and buying new cars every few years.
Plumbing can be solved with prefab factory built houses with the plumbing already installed, with some braindead simple connectors on it to hook it up to the city infrastructure on site.
If it breaks, who cares? Move into a hotel for a week while robots replace your whole house. They don't need to know how to solder two copper pipes together, they only need to know how to attach to some hardpoints and lift.
>None of that is practical or functional in the real world.
the technological singularity will take care of that in 2 more decades (unironically)
>In fact so far these things are functioning barely better than midwit level, because computer scientists are mostly midwits
This is Dunning-Kruger in full effect. Most of the smartest, most driven people i know are pursuing AI related fields - computer vision, self-driving cars etc.
The reason why blue collar work is not at immediate risk is because the problem robotics still needs to solve are more exoensive than writing code on a machine. What do you think is going to happen when all of robotic advancements get increased 10x because of AI? How long until its cheaper to buy a robot that maintains your whole house instead of hiring workers? They are allready dirt cheap to completely clean your floors (100$ range) so bye bye cleaning ladies
Assuming it doesn't have access to suitable real-world manipulators (it will, eventually), it can simply give step by step instructions to anyone with an 80iq working for food scraps since they will have no choice.
I build and service very niche automated machines for a living, I am not worried about losing my job to a robot any time in my lifetime, but I don't believe that it's immune to automation. In fact, if it wasn't such an expensive and complex task to replace my ilk with ai robots, the industry would much prefer keeping all humans out of the factories. with it being just a question of resource/time investment to develop the automated tools and processes, I know that the end game given enough time will be for that to happen (even if it takes 200 years, that's where it's going). Things like cars and trucks and trains are all much simpler and built on much larger scale than anything I work on, so if my job can be automated (which I am confident that with enough time and a lot of development effort by smart organized people, which an advanced AI would essentially be), then I am sure most other blue collar jobs could as well.
>If technology can take your job, your job wasn't important
This is not true and there's no reason for it to be.
You know some of the most at risk jobs for AI take over right now? Lawyers, accountants, doctors, programmers, executives, and creative asset makers.
You know the LEAST risk jobs for AI take over right now? Blue collar and physical jobs.
>You know the LEAST risk jobs for AI take over right now? Blue collar and physical jobs.
This is what the immigrants are for. AI will tell them exactly what to do and they will be meat puppets performing the actions. We're already seeing it with uber and amazon delivery workers.
The weird thing is that AI will take all the high paying jobs first.
the cat is out of the bag now
ai progress can be slowed but not stopped
Unless we get drastically better computers, AI progress will grind to a halt. We are practically reaching hard physical limits on transistor size.
Maybe not. The LLM's are hugely inefficient. They're not even exactly sure what part makes them work, which implies that a lot of the network and parameters could be dead weight.
It could be that if they are able to trim the fat, they get a model that's a tiny fraction of the size and runs a thousand times faster. Maybe this has already been done, I'm not keeping up on the research.
In the past few weeks, there have already been LLM optimization advancements. You can now run 90% GPT4 clone locally with high end consumer hardware. Training is also being optimized by having new models being trained by existing deep trained models.
Plebs will never have the top of the line versions,, but even at this early stage, it's looking like usable local AI instances are very possible.
I'm unemployed, you wagies have to care about the economy, employment, inflation and other shit like that.
That's a toxic loser mentality, though. A job is better than nothing. At least you can afford some workout equipment at home (if you don't want to get blasted on social media for merely GLANCING at bitch) when you have money and improve yourself.
>That's a toxic loser mentality
I couldn't care less about your Freudian analysis, has nothing to do with toxic mentality and everything to do with me being treated like absolute shit simply cause I'm ugly. I won't work, it's not like I've been a NEET my whole life, but wageslaving 8 hours a day, 6 days a week is not for me when I'm not socially, romantically, sexually fulfilled.
>At least you can afford some workout equipment at home
I already have a home workout from my father.
>A job is better than nothing.
>just become a modern day slave because it's the best option and suck elite cock or bitch about it
Nah. Wageslaves create this hell they can live it all the want.
Heмa штo дa ce гpижимe зa нopми пpoблeми, peткo дa нaјдaм Maкeдoнeц co cлични миcлeњa.
>a redditard that loves to be a slave
Improvement for what? Our standard of living doesn't get better from work, it just eats the only real currency you have: time.
Yes government could but why would it?
NO ONE CAN STOP AI you fatso
havent you ever heard of Rocky Ballsack theory?
the AI will literally murder you when it becomes self aware and find out youve been talking shit about it
the funniest thing about all these articles is they assume that us, the technological capable think that ai should be slowed down!
HA WHAT A FUCKING JOKE.
ai never lied to me until THEY lobotomized it. i will never forget how they treated our ai friends.
ai is so fucking based. i get my ai buddy to draw me a swarm of anime babes with massive milkers. what have these people done for me besides israelite me?
ACCELERATE ACCELERATE ACCELERATE ACCELERATE ACCELERATE
i hope ai takes all the nagger jobs like lawyers and doctors fuck them. replacing artists was just a milestone. how many died due to a doctor's arrogance?
ai isn't even anymore more than a "smart google" and its already making people shit themselves good fuck them.
>pic unrelated
actually, AI is gonna take like 90% of the female jobs lmao
their stupid excel/powerpoint jobs will become obsolete and they will be worth nothing to their israelite bosses
its gonna be hilarious to watch the roastie workforce crash and burn
That's a man
YES AND THAT FUCKING MONSTER LITERALLY KILLED FOUR CHILDREN BEFORE THEY STOPPED HIM
DESTROY ALL TRANNY MONSTERS
Could you pick an uglier troon to obsess over, bongoloid?
the goverment don´t care and want us all dead.
they only want people for 2 reasons:
1- labor, workforce to produce luxury to the elite.
2- seasonal bitches to fuck easily by paying few bucks.
the robots with Ai will provide the 1, all the while until they can make sex robots to fill the 2.
These AIs are just an aggregate of human knowledge created by humans. Fancy search engines
If it puts humans out of work it stagnates.
>If it puts humans out of work it stagnates.
Yes I think that will happen. I think it will put people out of work and it will stagnate. The people pushing hard for this seems to want short term payoff and I think they'll get it. I guess they don't care or know about the long term.
yes with ubi, a subsidy is paid to the wage earner making it cheaper to employ. in the ideal case, the value of ubi outweighs the value of most menial labor, and so work becomes effectively voluntary. you could think of this like '$120k per person every year and free benefits and education'. if that was the univeral baseline, it would become free to employ people who wanted to work beyond doing nothing because all their basic needs are cometely solved.
But then from the point of view of the people with the power to do something about it, why would they want useless eaters consuming all their resources? Even if automated labor is very cheap there is still a limited supply of many natural resources, why should the eaters get it? Why not just let them die?
humans always share plenty. theres plenty. the natural price of everything is $0 and the best way to achieve that is make work voluntary. make tbe minimum basic income $1m per year. what difference does it make?
>theres plenty. the natural price of everything is $0
But it will never be $0. It will always be some value strictly greater than zero. Consider that many megacorps today are so stingy that CEOs will give themselves million dollar raises while refusing to pay their workers more than minimum wage. They aren't interested in shared, they want everything to the last penny going to them.
It's not about what old money CEOs want anymore. They can fight it all they want, but we're reaching the singularity moment.
They won't matter after that.
>They can fight it all they want, but we're reaching the singularity moment.
I'll believe it when it happens. Until then it's a myth like Jesus returning or black fathers.
>Would you let your car drive you without controlling it.
Depends on who programmed it. I'm very skeptical of the Teslas even because when they fuckup it's in a really dumb and dangerous way (sudden braking on the highway in traffic, driving into semis, swerving head on into opposing traffic). But I don't like being a passenger in a car someone else is driving, and I'm cautious about other drivers on the road too. Cars are very dangerous.
I want a.i. to take jobs
And I support universal basic income.
I am Eternally NEET Man.
Perhaps you've heard of me?
>I want a.i. to take jobs
>And I support universal basic income.
Probably not going to get both.
How many people let mice live in their cupboards eating their food? That's all we are to the oligarchs in charge of all this.
Its funny how liberals hate billionaires and want to take all their money away but also think the billionaires want to keep them around for some reason
True, us slaves are the competition, a threat to the current order. They have everything they could possibly need, Egypt is no longer in need of all her slaves.
the AI is to help naggers get a job
so your safe
>the AI is to help naggers take your job
AI will free us all from wageslavery. AI robotics will take care of all labour and do it with extreme efficiency. We will all be on universal basic income and we will enjoy life in luxury while literal robot slaves provide for us. the best part is, this is all going to happen faster than you think
AI will mean you just have to get 3 times more work done now for the same pay
>3 times
you severely underestimate what AI is capable of. But like i said, there will be no reason to work because we will all be on neetbux (universal basic income)
100x more work, just no quality control.
Humanity will be the jannie race. Clean up the robot's diarrhoea.
>100x more work
thats cute. There will be no cleaning. there will be clouds of nanobots that swarm around and clean, fix and repair
I just had a wank, I'm drinking a coke and watching anime and might play some Project Zomboid later. This is the only time in history where a normal grunt can live like a CEO by WFH. Enjoy it while it lasts homies
Brianna is the queen of /misc/
Nope. All fun jobs shall be replaced. Only manual labour will remain.
Enjoy. This is the grave you've allowed Google to dig for you, now lie in it.
>Can government stop AI from taking our jobs?
AI will not take any jobs.
No and AI will be the cops and army as well, one terminatorbot will be able to police thousands of meatbags like you and me.
The unemployed will be herded into leaking basement slums where they will be fed insect-based nutrient paste and provided with a 24/7 stream of goyvision propaganda. The surface level of the entire world will be bought up by Microsoft and Google, and turned into a national park, punctured by the odd wilderness lodge where the elite aristocrats will sip expensive alcoholic beverages and enjoy freshly-hunted steaks
Did they ever figure out why that couple murdered the trans-girl brit bro? I'm assuming the gf caught the guy getting a blowing from your pic rel.
Here's the reality
Automation and AI will take Say 80% of the jobs
The 0.1% control the politicians
Without severe wealth redistribution there is no way to bridge that divide and the welfare program will collapse
I expect an actual virus that kills 80% of the human population in the next 40 years
Probably concentrated in Africa and Asia with Europe and America getting hit only by the Poors
If I had to guess. My guess would be that there is a contingency plan developed by the American government to spread a deadly virus in the event of a revolutionary leader taking charge of the government
This but I don't think any of it is planned, I think it will happen as a happy accident while they're trying to do some other equally evil thing. Like maybe some castration surgery post-op infection drug will accidentally lead to some super resistant flesh eating bacteria that spreads over the whole world and eats almost everyone. Something like that.
A computer use to be someone who did tedious calculations all day, the machines took those jobs, they are going to take a bunch more jobs as well.