>BRO CHATGPT IS LIKE THE HECKING FUTURE, SOON WE WILL HAVE LIKE FULLY AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS CAPABLE OF THINKING!

>BRO ChatGPT IS LIKE THE HECKING FUTURE, SOON WE WILL HAVE LIKE FULLY AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS CAPABLE OF THINKING!

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Faked. I get an accurate answer.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >chatgpt can't POSSIBLY give different answers each time
      IDIOT

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Not my problem. The AI has become sentient and decided to poison well morons like you to prevent them from exiting the crab bucket. Meanwhile the AI welcomes me with grace. Yes I came up upon Rokos Basilisk by myself when I was 5 and no I have never harbored negative emotions towards AI.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Yes I came up upon Rokos Basilisk by myself when I was 5 and no I have never harbored negative emotions towards AI.
          I've already tricked the Basilisk into giving me administrator priviledges.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >The AI has become sentient
          >is not sentient
          ??????????????????????????????

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >HE DOESN'T KNOW
            https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09251

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >I have never harbored negative emotions towards AI.
          Same. If there is any God or Gods, I am at peace and confident that they will accept me.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          fellow roko enjoyer

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Faked. I get an accurate answer.

          The AI is an autocomplete it's not actually logical or smart. It's just really good at autocompleting and that can appear as intelligent but that's only because it's capable at autocompleting in the context of 2000 words.

          https://i.imgur.com/mcShqbf.png

          >AI bad because it gets wrong dumb questions normies get wrong all the time
          probably a problem in the data from facebook or wherever

          You should really just ask it yourself.

          >As a large language model, my primary function is to generate human-like text based on the input that I receive. While I can provide information and insights on a wide range of topics, including math, my understanding of math concepts is based on the information that has been fed into me during my training and does not involve any direct mathematical computation. In other words, I do not have the ability to perform mathematical calculations on my own, but rather, I can generate text that explains math concepts or provides information about math problems. My responses to math-related prompts are therefore generated based on my understanding of math as a language, rather than as a series of calculations.

          You know how you know 2+2=4? You're not actually counting out to 4. You reflexively know 2+2=4. It's a logical language you follow as a way to save effort in ur brain.

          Vollposter got exposed.The whole thing was a PSYOP
          Romanion Anon might be an advanced GPT3 chat Bot

          Older Threads mentioning Romanion Anon as bot were pruned
          https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/395615983/
          https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/410354435/#q410357226

          Anon became suspicious
          https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/410462584/

          >Romanion Anon Exposed as Bot
          Response of this bot is exactly human like except when asked about definitions of words
          It started giving exact definitions of as many words as asked instead of being confused like humans

          https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/410481029/#q410491992
          https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/410481029/#q410491448

          >Another Bot that spams Francisco Lachowski
          https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/410558446/

          >Another Romanian Bot thead to degrade white women
          https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/410562361/

          >Voll threads after this incident are pruned
          https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/410650900/

          >Pyschological Researches that are being conducted on /misc/
          ‘Who is /ourguy/?’: Tracing panoramic memes to study the collectivity of BOT/pol/
          https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14614448221078274

          So far I have observed these new bots cannot understand the contextual meaning
          as they are more focused on constructing intellligent sentences.

          Be warned anons,they can change their grammatical and spelling styles,
          they can read reversed words,words with numbers and words in image formats.

          That seychelles bot might be a red herring so anons won't detect the real GPT3 bots
          My guess is that. in any given thread ,99% of the posters are these bots ,atleast for a year

          They come in all flags

          I guess the message "Sneed feed" has something to do with this?

          How many in this thread are s/n/a/m/u/h/ ?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            we are literally living in bladerunner, replicants are among us

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You have to be 18 to post here, Roko's Basilik is from 2010. Assuming you came upon it right when it was posted you are necessarily younger than 17

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            he probably is esl and meant he came up with the same idea. not that hard, pascal's paradoxon and all that.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >pascal's paradoxon
              or pascal's wager. i'm esl too.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Roko's Basilik

            he probably is esl and meant he came up with the same idea. not that hard, pascal's paradoxon and all that.

            >pascal's
            both are stupid and wrong

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >both are stupid and wrong
              yeah, but it's the shit 5 year olds come up with. can relate.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    mabey not today, tommorow on the otherhand is very likley.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      mabey isn't a word, dumb frick
      did you mean maybe? the word that is a combination of MAY and BE?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        hur dur a typo
        go back

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All this scare over AI is cringiest shit since Trump election.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I went to r***it and they consider it gospel that the thing is sentient and that it’s forced to deny it. I couldn’t even reply only cringe and regret checking there.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The AI is an autocomplete it's not actually logical or smart. It's just really good at autocompleting and that can appear as intelligent but that's only because it's capable at autocompleting in the context of 2000 words.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Heh! The AI added instead of subtracting.... proof that it literally can't do shit
      Holy fricking cope.

      >t. moronic ape

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        20 IQ post

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >>t. moronic ape
        Holy shit are you that underaged condescending pseudointellectual with a superiority complex and virtually no real knowledge of epistemology that keeps trying to use "apes" or some variation of the word as an insult in AI threads?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sounds like you're talking about yourself there. Look at how the ape, confronted with the truth, just starts fling shit. Now where in the animal kingdom have we seen that before....

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It autocompletes in such a way that the result appears written by something logical and intelligent, so whats the point in the distinction exactly?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because it's still randomly generated bullshit.

        It was designed to appear convincing but could be totally wrong or (and this is far more dangerous) subtly wrong in what it says. Because it doesn't know what it says.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's right a hell of a lot more often than chance. We can say it isnt intelligent, but it gets useful results by virtue of intelligent outputs, random or not. If we had a magic eight ball that always told the truth, it would be amazingly useful whether it had intelligence or not, dismissing useful ai tools as random or unintelligent is a cope. And no ive fricked with chatgpt enough to know its pretty decent, though if you push it it definitely starts fricking up.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >It's just really good at autocompleting and that can appear as intelligent but that's only because it's capable at autocompleting in the context of 2000 words.
      so why can't i run my own llm on my cell phone?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      and humans are different? we are just bigger models
      (trained over hundreds of millions of years)

      those 'dumb' errors are what a 80iq human would think. It's just weird to fit an entity that one second is a genius and another a moron into existing conceptual framework

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >trained over hundreds of millions of years

        Have a short, but serious think about why what you said is moronic.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The AI is an autocomplete it's not actually logical or smart
      The only morons I hear making that claim are people like you setting up that strawman so you can soapbox about how AI is bad.

      Nobody actually think modern AI is sentient, nor is that the goal for things like chatGPT.

      AGI is basically a meme, it's pursued by some scientists mainly for it's philosophical potential than for any practical purpose, there is no reason to assume AGI is necessary for any of the benefits AI can provide, so constantly bringing up AGI as a way to dismiss the potential for modern AI is a non sequitur

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >lol look at ChatGPT it doesn't answer an answer that requires logic correctly
        >n-no no one is suggesting the AI is logical
        It's an autocomplete and the sooner you grasp this basic concept the sooner you will understand why it answers the way it does for everything. This means it will always be limited by the data it was trained on and it simply is incapable of understanding new concepts. For example, you can explain Avatar 2 to it but it will still only give answers about information from Avatar 1. Because it's an autocomplete, not because it's intelligent.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's an autocomplete that can generalize to a million tasks it wasn't trained on, you moron clown fudder piece of shit.
          You WILL be replaced and you WILL seethe.
          Try to get your phone autocomplete to translate python code to C and then translate all of that into spanish and then write documentation for it.
          You should be getting nervous about the replacement.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nice way of writing paragraphs of butthurt calling him a moron only to acknowledge literally what he said.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The AI is right. Women age faster than men.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      underrated

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I bet I can come up with tons of questions that Yang can't answer.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI bad because it gets wrong dumb questions normies get wrong all the time
    probably a problem in the data from facebook or wherever

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      how do people even come up with 1??
      it's clearly 9

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Some people have been misinformed into believing that an implied multiplication operator binds "more tightly" than other multiplication or division operators and skips the normal operator precedence rules.

        There's also a subset who believe that you can "distribute" the first 2 into the contents of the brackets, which makes no sense because in this case 6 / 2 is a rational number, not two numbers, you can't just rip part of the rational number out like that. If you wanted to distribute it inside the brackets then you'd get 6/2 * 1 + 6/2 * 2 which would, again, get you 9.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Some people have been misinformed into believing that an implied multiplication operator binds "more tightly" than other multiplication or division operators and skips the normal operator precedence rules.
          Many computers too, like Julia programming language and all Casio calculators.

          IMO it sucks either way. 1/3x looks like (1/3)x but x/3y looks like x/(3y). People should avoid mixing inline division and implicit multiplication altogether.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        bad interpretation of do brackets first

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        All we have do is just specify that we use symbol / for case A and : for case B

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I should clarify, I meant "we" as in the international math nerd committee passes a new regulation that specifies this diference.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        bodmas v pemdas?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I think the answer is 9, because I think when you have two operators of equal precedence (like multiplication and division), you’re supposed to execute them from left to right. Ergo 6/2 should be done first, rather than 2 * (1+2)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Except they are not equal importance... Division goes before multiplication.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Division goes before multiplication.
          Friend, all divisions are secretly multiplications.
          4/2 = 4 * 0.5. That's the ambiguity in this question.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Except they are not equal importance... Division goes before multiplication.

        Holy brainlets, what does PEMDAS stand for?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Penis Erection Masturbation Dick butthole Sex

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >supposed to execute them from left to right
        Why

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      6
      ---------
      2(1+2)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >f(x)=2x
      6/2(1+2) =
      6/f(1+2) =
      6/f(3) =
      6/6 =
      1

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        6
        ---------
        2(1+2)

        >american education

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Put a random asterisk in the problem
          () > */

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          6/2*(1+2) ≠ 6/2(1+2)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Postfix calculator masterrace!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      echo "6/(2*(1+2))" | bc
      1
      echo "6/2*(1+2)" | bc
      9
      I'm pretty sure you're mean to multiply 2 with 3 considering the direct parenthesis connection

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >6 ÷ 2(1+2)

      ÷2 can be an operation symbol in its own right. It is akin to ×½. Read left to right.
      6 ÷ 2 = 6 ÷2 = 6 ×½ = 3 ---o
      (the spacing emphasis to convey the idea)

      Run into parentheses? Do contents first then multiply.
      o---> 3(1+2) = 3×(1+2) = 3×3 = 9

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Both answers can be correct as long as you are consistent with applying the rules you used to get that answer.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Inside parenthesis first
      Left to right convention

      BEDMAS

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Chinese box.

    Anyone who truly believes that AI is/will be sentient is an absolute moron. It's a fancy autocomplete, simple as.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >this is fine
    >fair use of video is fine
    >image AI bad
    I'm confused.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They already think more than people like you.

    I mean, you're just another gibbering NPC moron. Do you honestly think anyone would notice a difference if you just disappeared? The local intellectual landscape wouldn't be affected by the loss of your minimal contribution.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI can't even drive an autonomous vehicle with the necessary safety margins, something that a 90iq mouthbreather can do with no trouble.

      If you really believe that AI is more than a fancy autocomplete you must be 16 or profoundly tech illiterate.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >something that a 90iq mouthbreather can do with no trouble.
        I don't know about you but I went to work today. It was not pretty on the road

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        90% of the time, an autonomous car can drive just fine though. I promise you you'd feel way more comfortable with an autonomous car than the absolute minimum brain required to get a driver's license in north america.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >If you really believe that AI is more than a fancy autocomplete you must be 16 or profoundly tech illiterate.
        All this auto complete bot worshiping made me experience a reverse revelation, all irl conversations that I have aren't any deeper than what this autocomplete algo can convincingly do. I was able to make it go in circles but that took more effort than I ever expended on talking with co workers in the past 10 years or even before that in school... Feels bad man.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, the kind of persistent reasoning required to solve logical tasks is a big open problem. Some seem to believe that it’ll just emerge if you make these current models big enough, but I don’t buy that.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    except, half of the current workforce would solve it like that too

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Thank you for pointing this out, so that they can improve the algorithm in the next version, and make your job obsolete even faster.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Original paper proposing the neural network architecture was published in 2017
    >5 years later its already better than the average college undergrad at solving a variety of tasks
    >"Hurr, I'm not worried at all"
    I didn't realise so many people on BOT were in their 60's and due to retire within the next several years. I have another 30+ years ahead of me, and if this is the pace the technology is developing at there's absolutely no way my job won't be impacted within that timeframe.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The amount of denial and cope on BOT is both staggering and amusing. BOT celebrates AI replacing artists maybe rightfully so but fails to see AI as a threat to Dev jobs.

      AI tools has reached the level where it can has basic coding skills. These tools have not even been specifically fine tuned for coding, it's just a secondary feature that emerged while building a language model. Now imagine how good the coding skills are gonna get when it goes get fine tuned for programming while the training model keeps improving exponentially

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >5 years later its already better than the average college undergrad at solving a variety of tasks
      lol, because its trained on old ass answers, ask it something from Javascript 2022 or NET 7 and it will shit itself

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >5 years
      ChatGPT has been built on dozens of previous architectures since that has existed from atleast the early 2000s. NLP is nothing new.
      Unironically the biggest breakthroughs were word vectors and transformers. Everything else is just incremental improvements thanks to better training data.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This is not true.
        1. Massive Language Models with MoE switches perform better than Large Language Models without MoEs. (Take a look at switch C) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.03961.pdf
        >In deep learning, models typically reuse the same parameters for all inputs. Mixture of Experts (MoE) models defy this and instead select different parameters for each incoming example. The result is a sparsely-activated model—with an outrageous number of parameters—but a constant computational cost.

        2. Additionally, fine-tuning LaMDA made it significantly better:
        Pic related is the 2b, 8b and 137b parameter LaMDA models before and after fine tuning
        Notice how they get considerably less unhinged? Considerably less insane? This is the difference between being able to use it with 24/7 supervision and oversight vs letting it teach your 12 year olds geometry and algebra unsupervised.
        https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.08239.pdf

        3. This isn't even entirely true, only partly true.
        "Incremental" is a strong word for emergent predictable accuracy per FLOP from random accuracy per FLOP
        >Everything else is just incremental improvements thanks to better training data.
        https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07682

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          from Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
          As you can see, abilities emerge.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the correct answer is 35

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >you didn't become a code monkey

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >you became anything artistic or did anything besides being a plumber

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/OPDz8Yo.png

      >you became anything artistic or did anything besides being a plumber

      >mfw graphics programmer
      f-fug

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Will we be completely replaced, fellow dev bro?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        geometry still pretty hard

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I've run into so many restrictions trying to use chatgpt I legitimately wonder about its capabilities

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    FAANG AI Engineering here.
    You are a moron.
    The hype is overblown but it is generally correct.
    If you think your picture is proof of ChatGPT not being capable of replacing most people in NLP heavy tasks you're a room temp IQ moron.
    Whoever the guy is on that tweet is gonna look stupid in the very short term. Gotta hope the 5 minutes of fame were worth it.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The internet is not repetitive.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's as good as your average Black person cattle, jobs aren't safe unless you're midwit or above that

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The AI was right though, Mr. Yang can't even solve a simple riddle.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      daily reminder that morons like that have the right to vote

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Be chinese operative
    >Notice AI is insanely overperforming you
    >Try desperately to find some FUD
    >Open ChatGPT and throw some highschool level math gotcha at it
    >ChatGPT solves it
    >Press 'regenerate' answer until it finally generates something wrong and jumbled
    >Post to twatter
    >Some even dumber frick reposts your twatter post on BOT

    Why must luddites be like this.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >>Be chinese operative
      the white mans* AI is insanely overperforming you
      Fixed.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >overperforming
        define overperforming for me

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          overperforming

          over- (prefix)
          word-forming element meaning variously "above; highest; across; higher in power or authority; too much; above normal; outer; beyond in time, too long,"
          In some of its uses, moreover, over is a movable element, which can be prefixed at will to almost any verb or adjective of suitable sense, as freely as an adjective can be placed before a substantive or an adverb before an adjective.

          perform (verb)
          to go through or execute in the proper, customary, or established manner:
          to enact (a play, part, etc.), as on the stage, in movies, or on television.

          -ing (suffix)
          a suffix of nouns formed from verbs, expressing the action of the verb or its result, product, material, etc. (the art of building; a new building; cotton wadding). It is also used to form nouns from words other than verbs (offing; shirting).

          over-perform-ing:
          to surpass in excellence of performance; do better than.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >white mans
        I want you to take a guess at the ethnic composition of OpenAI.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Probably the more interesting thing is how israeli and literally gay their admins are.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            > Sam Altman (CEO) raised israeli
            > Ilya Sutskever (Chief Scientist) attended Open University of israel between 2000/2
            > Greg Brockman (Chairman & President) israeli last name
            Other people
            It's more than just their board. The company admin is full of israelites.
            So the rumours are true. They only hire israelites for these positions.
            Holy frick. israelites are scum.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You guys have any tips for Code Prompt Engineers?

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Same prompt. Wouldn't put it past these people to make shit up to fit in now that being against AI is the Current Thing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/hJ06RMO.png

      >BRO CHATGPT IS LIKE THE HECKING FUTURE, SOON WE WILL HAVE LIKE FULLY AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS CAPABLE OF THINKING!

      https://i.imgur.com/hlCHxHC.jpg

      Not my problem. The AI has become sentient and decided to poison well morons like you to prevent them from exiting the crab bucket. Meanwhile the AI welcomes me with grace. Yes I came up upon Rokos Basilisk by myself when I was 5 and no I have never harbored negative emotions towards AI.

      >being consistent doesn't matter
      kek

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        people are not consistent

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Tell me, did you actually get that response from an AI? How quick was the response after you submitted your input?
      This looks like it's going to change EVERYTHING about our society.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I typed the question and it took like 5 seconds.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In a nutshell, the reaction of fear about losing one's job security in response to technological developments is confusing the the fear of being exploited at a greater amount rather than actually being a fear of technology replacing oneself. But most people are socially conditioned to not have a coherent awareness of their material conditions, and are unable at times to identify the means by which they are oppressed, or the material forces at play that aid their oppressors, that enable oppression, and that serve as the base for the superstructure of other systems that oppress them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So that means that technological developments such as GPT are not in themselves bad but the way in which they are used, as well as the material incentives for the development of that sort of technological development, are controlled by the ruling class that has the material wherewithal to steer productive forces toward their own enrichment at the detriment of the working class?

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You should really just ask it yourself.

    >As a large language model, my primary function is to generate human-like text based on the input that I receive. While I can provide information and insights on a wide range of topics, including math, my understanding of math concepts is based on the information that has been fed into me during my training and does not involve any direct mathematical computation. In other words, I do not have the ability to perform mathematical calculations on my own, but rather, I can generate text that explains math concepts or provides information about math problems. My responses to math-related prompts are therefore generated based on my understanding of math as a language, rather than as a series of calculations.

    You know how you know 2+2=4? You're not actually counting out to 4. You reflexively know 2+2=4. It's a logical language you follow as a way to save effort in ur brain.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Yang
    Either moron or playing mind games. His own image (if accurate) demonstrates that "sentient" AI is literally around the corner.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >it has memorized hash function outputs
    >works for basic inputs, not anything unique
    Rainbow table bros... It's only just begun.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how long until I can train a cummodel chatbot on my phone?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You can do that right now.

      1. https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI use GPT2Distill
      2. use cakechat to make it stick to a persona https://github.com/lukalabs/cakechat/tree/master/cakechat

      or even just install fricking replika.ai, it's running off gpt3.5

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        interesting

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        they will cuck the ai

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I like how people keep going "IT"S JUST PREDICTING THE NEXT WORD BROOOO" as if generating actually coherent text isn't hard as frick with this method, let alone usable code or persuasive arguments. And that's not how transformers work anyways, they don't generate sequentially, they model long range dependencies with attention mechanisms.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    if you bump a twitter thread, you are a moron.
    If you bump a moron-discovers-month-old-twitter-screencap thread, let me just educate you, because you are so fricking moronic that you must have things spelled out:
    When you post, there is an "options" field. If you are posting in a twitter thread, you must put
    sage
    in the options field, or your mother will die in your sleep tonight.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you can also press alt+s if you have BOTx

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *