British student ARRESTED for AI generating porn of Bart Simpson

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/brit-student-caught-pics-bart-30131355
"it's AI generated" will NOT be tolerated as an excuse, you sick fricks. EVEN for cartoon characters.

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 9 months ago
    Froggy

    Wait cartoon porn can be illegal in Britain? Huh.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      I am reporting you now to UK police

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Only if you don't have the proper licenses

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Man, and I thought Americans were obsessed with black people.
        I go to London and people won't stop asking me if I have my BBC license or not. Jesus.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      .>tfw amerifat
      >Tfw you probably broke the law in uk sometime in the past with cartoon porn.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      If it's of someone or a character who's underage, yes.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Stay halal brother

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      its illegal in most first world countries because they understand its used to groom children and often found along side real child porn. can't say much about the third world/communist countries

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        good one anon

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, it isn't. Only anglo countries have this hysteria about drawings, the US is only safe thanks to the 1st amendment, otherwise it would be banned there too.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      everything is, the queen is sensitive

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        > the queen
        Should we tell him bros?

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          We have lived to see a moronic king.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      the only country it's explicitly legal in is, I shit you not, israel

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. They probably didn't mean to make Simpsons rule 34 illegal. Its probably just to make a foolproof law against people running real CP through a photoshop filter and claiming its a drawing. Also a decent way to catch people who have real CP

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >running real CP through a photoshop filter and claiming its a drawing
        this is why we can't have nice things

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >That's an awfully detailed floor you've got there

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          I feel like having that on your HDD would raise some eyebrows whether or not it was legal or not.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            What do you think my girlfriend would say if she saw my stash of dubiously legal high-resolution floor images?

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            I have thousands of images of floor tiles

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Meanwhile in 'murica, cartoon CP is classified as obscenity depending on "Whether a reasonable person finds that the matter, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
      Sauce: https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-obscenity

      AI Winter can't come soon enough.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      if you're not a member of the royal family, house of lords, or church of england, yes

  2. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    why would cartoon porn be prohibited?

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Court case ruled that any pornography depicting a minor, real or not, is CP.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stickmen too?

  3. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    DON'T EAT MY SHORTS, MAN!

  4. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >britbong cops care more about cartoons than real kids being raped by foreigner rape gangs

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      I dont think any nation on the planet has worse cops than britbongs. They are completely usles and only serve as a way for establishment to frick with average poeple.

  5. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    how did they even find it

  6. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    picrel isn't a meme anymore

  7. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I read the whole article and I still can't tell if it's real or a gag.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's real, this kind of wacko shit is common in britain for some reason

  8. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    No images no crime. Show the evidence.

  9. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >oiy, should'a apploied fo' a loicense ye should'a... now its twentay years in da slammah fo you.

  10. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >drawings are illegal in Britain
    Yeah, this isn't news. Reminder that the British police raided an art museum to destroy this guy's work because they decided that it was child porn:

    https://www.artnet.com/artists/graham-ovenden

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Kinda looks like it is...

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        they were right.

        >Art is porn
        This is your brain on BOT.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Porn is art

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      they were right.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      I hate UK homosexuals. I hope they all die, fricking get replaced with mudslimes. Frick Churchill. Heil Hitler.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >mudslimes
        chup chamaar
        back to inch

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ugly as frick. Westerners can't into e-girl.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        art is supposed to be ugly, at least that's what untalented individuals focus on because they can't create beauty.

        shit looks ai generated

        It really does. It's quite impressive in that sense.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      because it is

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      shit looks ai generated

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >picting a minor, real or not, is CP.
      >>>
      >Anonymous 06/01/23(Thu)20:15:57 No.938

      it kinda is... that guy painted the girls who he abused.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, it's the other way around. The court decided that painting them was abuse.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        He didn't abuse anyone you absolute moron

  11. 9 months ago
    Sneedy

    Bart get out I'm piss.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Damn came here to post this

  12. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't Bart have his wiener out in the movie? Why didn't they arrest everyone involved in that movie?

    • 9 months ago
      Sneedy

      i just looked it up and I saw bart's penis on youtube

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      It was kinda just an outline
      Also there is a distinction between CP and nude images of minors.
      Images specifically created to arouse or excite is porn and that is where the crime is. Having an outline of barts dick as a gag about convenient censoring doesn't really cross the line of porn.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        How do they know the AI Bart porn wasn't meant as shock humor?

        • 9 months ago
          Sneedy Pie

          because they came to it

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Things tend to be up to interpretation, honestly the fact this is prosecuted just shows how backwards the priorities are of British law enforcement.
          The kid pleaded guilty so he didn't put up any defense and more than likely got a very light sentence because of his plea. Depending on the quality of the images generated he could have put up a defense saying that the images where of no pornographic value but IDK how the UK defines what is porn, if it's either completely up for interpretation or there has to be some objective measure of intent and substance.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Would childrens feet be considered porn if the producer was obviously using it in a sexual manner?

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            :^)

            (pats the seat)

            come sit in the seat anon. let's review some text messages.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        You could have just saved time by typing "because a israelite made it/made money off of it"

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Da JOOOOOOZ
          I hope youll remember this post when the democrats arrest you for hatespeech chud

  13. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    barsinso

  14. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Now the weird thing is, if he generated furry Bart Simpson it would have been completely legal.

  15. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why the frick did this moron (who sounds like a korean tbh) have 49 images of bart porn lol

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      It doesn't say that he did. It says that he has at least one picture of Bart getting sucked off by Marge, and 49 "similar images." "Similar" probably just means other Simpsons porn, possibly other cartoon porn in general. Also, it's not AI generated; this isn't a new case. He just had his sentencing today after being charged three years ago. Presumably his hearing has been delayed several times due to covid.

  16. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    ay carumba

  17. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >oi, got a loicence for that shota?

  18. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just a friendly reminder that the US isn't less moronic on this issue, which it's stupid "obscenity laws".

    https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/08/us/08brfs-OBSCENITYSEN_BRF.html

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >pled guilty
      She literally didn't even challenge the constitutionality of her charges. Literally every time someone gets arrested for e-girl/shota, they either happen to also have literal CP, and the e-girl/shota is a footnote, or it's shit like this where she pled fricking guilty. We've already had a SCOTUS case arguing that "virtualized" CP isn't CP and isn't obscene, but just because you have a constitutional right to something doesn't mean the government's not going to violate it when you're literally rolling over and taking it.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        The thing is that even if you challenge the constitutionality and win, your life was already ruined the moment you got arrested.

  19. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is Britain we're talking about. They ban e-girl/shota. AI generating e-girl/shota doesn't make it stop being e-girl/shota. Here in the US, things are different. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition makes them legal. This would apply whether it's drawn by hand or generated by an AI. And if you don't believe it's legal in the US, I would like to remind you that you are on a website hosted in the US that openly permits e-girl and shota to be posted (albeit only on /b/) and has yet to be taken down by authorities despite being a very larger website that many would love to see shut down. Not only that, but as I post this, there is a e-girl thread on the front page of /b/, and also an AI generated porn thread which contains AI generated e-girls. Neither violates the rules because they are placed on the appropriate board and do not violate US law.

  20. 9 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      haha

  21. 9 months ago
    TheCunnyMaster

    Literal 1984

  22. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Take digital privacy seriously and you can enjoy your life without the government getting into your business.

  23. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just air gap your generation station and crunch all numbers in local. In Minecraft.

  24. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    uk is collapsing.

  25. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Certain combinations of brush strokes on a canvas are illegal
    God I really fricking hate obscenity laws

    Including pic to get any Brit viewing this thread arrested

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      better post mitsudomoe

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        but enough about the Akamatsu clan.

  26. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    What if I make a cartoon character that people draw porn of and then I say "oh btw she's 17" would the artists then get arrested?

  27. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    What would happen if you asked an AI to draw Bart Simpson and it decided to draw porn of him on its own? You know how finicky AI can be with prompts.

  28. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    UK is a totalitarian fascist state

  29. 9 months ago
    Anonymous
  30. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >investigating break ins? nah
    >investigating thefts? nah
    >investigating simpson porn? that's the one

  31. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    He should have just drugged and raped a few dozen children, then the police would be intimidating the rape victims instead of charging him.

  32. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why did the police raid this guy's home though? Did he post the pictures on a British AI coomer forum or something?

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Probably was using a discord/collab and someone reported him.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Probably was using a discord/collab and someone reported him.

      I bet he was in trouble for something completely unrelated. The stupid thing about these laws is you can find the same things on rule34 sites, here, twitter, reddit, etc and the gov isn't making any attempts to stop it. You're only prosecuted if you're being prosecuted for something else which is kinda fricked in a way.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I bet he was in trouble for something completely unrelated.
        I really don't believe so. The bolice don't just go to your house with a search warrant and seize your electronics for forensic investigation specifically.

  33. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >airstrip one
    This is the same place that requires photo ID of an adult to purchase fricking spoons.

  34. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Simpsons porn
    He should be on the sex offender registry for extremely shit taste

  35. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh shit, this is getting seriou-
    >Britain
    Every day, I thank god for being born in italy, a state where the government is so slow that they still communicate through FAX

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is e-girl illegal in Italy?

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Italy
        Yes if it's a realistic drawing, unclear when it's an obvious cartoon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_child_pornography
        >He must pay a £114 surcharge.
        To whom? Bart?

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >He avoided both after a court heard no real child was involved
          >£114 victim surcharge
          Then who was victim?

          Maybe he was ordered to draw himself handing over the money to Bart? Would be an interesting concept. Imagine a world where it was mandatory that anyone who drew their OCs impregnating fictional characters needed to draw themselves handing over child support

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      The fact that real 'p is illegal anywhere is sad.

  36. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what are you in here for, boy?
    >I used artificial intelligence to generate explicit images of Bart Simpson

  37. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh shit, guess I better delete the simpsons movie off my hard drive then...

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS

  38. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >An example of one image was computer generated of a male child, effectively a cartoon. It’s one cartoon that may be known to the court.
    >It’s effectively Bart Simpson.
    >He continued: That’s effectively what these images are, they are cartoon images of children and adults.
    >The defendant comes before the court with no convictions or cautions. The maximum sentence is three years.
    As an attorney myself I'd have taken his case just for the kek of it.

  39. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    So is the simpsons movie now illegal in bri-in? His dick was shown in it.

  40. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    She did, however, note there were “some points of concern” in the pre-sentence report written looking into his behaviour.

    He pleaded guilty at South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court to possession of the prohibited images of children from February 19, 2019, and August 4, 2020.

  41. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    > Moon, 23, faced up to three years behind bars and a spell on the sex offenders register for his crime.

    > He avoided both after a court heard no real child was involved, he had not distributed the images, his offence was committed three years ago and he had not reoffended. Moon was given a 12-month community order, containing 20 days of rehabilitative work with the Probation Service. Moon must also pay a £114 victim surcharge.

    Plus VAT.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >3 years ago
      >AI
      ?

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        It wasn't AI, OP made that up.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Oh. I really oughtta leave this place and stick to books. Too much morons and fake news.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >He avoided both after a court heard no real child was involved
      >£114 victim surcharge
      Then who was victim?

  42. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    But how did they even find out?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *