You guys are absolutely insistent that this is terrible for men and that aren't making a grave mistake.
Can you just... let us.
You know, it's a free country.
Why do you have to walk right up to our house and hammer on our door and say "STOP YOU'RE DOING SOMETHING ALONE FROM OTHER PEOPLE IN THE PRIVACY OF YOUR OWN HOME. STOP IT NOW"
Oh, it's because this is a threat to society.
If men aren't going out and working so they can earn lots of monay, it can seriously deflate the economy.
Men weren't getting any of that before. But now they're not getting it and they're also just giving up on society and the concept of a real women.
This is your dystopian cyberpunk future, fuck-os. You earned it.
I've seen that doing the rounds but didn't look it up.
What really is it >Female statistician worried about all the stats that point out how fucked she and everyone else are
Fun stuff.
And what IS the writer of this >30 year old single woman
So she has the means to at least try to do something about the problems she underlines and chooses not to while blaming men when she and women like her ultimately decide if they want a relationship or a fucking baby.
Not a fragment of self reflection and seems to intentionally avoid extrapolating what 30% of women being single compared to 60% of men means.
You know how feminists like to tell men "step up your game and learn how to handle me"?
Caitlin Roper needs to step up her... steps. On the treadmill. She is driving toward the wall at a high acceleration.
I don't get their logic, if there even is any. >I don't want to fuck this man >so this man will get no companionship or attention from me >this guy is now talking to a chatbot >NOOO HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN THIS IS UNDERMINING FEMALE INDEPENDENCE THE MISOGYNISTS ARE WINNING SKREEEEEEEEE
You literally didn't want these men, what's the fucking problem if pretend their wife is hatsune miku?
Women derive their sense of importance from the idea that men need them and men inventing their way out of this predicament drives roasties insane. They are begging us to keep allowing them wield unearned power over us.
This quote is a perfect representation of the female mindset.
Simply rejecting you isn't enough. They NEED to know you're suffering without them. They get off on thinking about how miserable undesirable men are sitting around alone and unloved while she showers Chad in sexual affection.
The hatred and sense of cruel sadism women feel towards undesirable men (which is 80% of them by womens standards) is simply something men cannot fathom.
modern feminists don't care about equality they want to replace patriarchy with matriarchy but couldn't bear the consequences. So they basically wish for a system where men only work and live for the whims of women which they freak out when men just don't want to ruin their lives for a soggy crevice that offers no intimacy or love to them.
>the world is full of undesirable men >ugh I wish they wouldn't talk to me >now they're talking to a robot and won't bother me >NOOOO they shouldn't have that either
It's like the conservative gay sex argument: "somewhere in the world, right now, two men could be having having anal sex and it is making me very angry". Why should they care about if an ugly jobless balding short virgin gets ChatGPT to tell him "I love you"?
She's arguing about the power dynamics of relationships that don't involve her, it's only logical to ask her opinions on ones which don't involve her sex to see how hard she's projecting.
"Sex dolls + robots embody the messages, the ideology, of porn - that women are objects for men's sexual use. They replicate the same power dynamics between men and women expressed in pornography - male dominance and female subordination."
- Caitlin Roper.
>male dominance and female subordination
These feminists need to stop whining and start dominating me instead. I want to submit to them but they only care about the men they hate. The best way to get their attention is to talk shit to them.
the guys getting them were most likely never going to fuck real women anyway, i dont get why she's threatened by them. she doesnt even view the men who would get them as men in her brain to begin with.
Women unironically want men they don't find sexually attractive to suffer.
It makes sense if you accept that women view their sexuality as moral-making. Meaning, if they're sexually attracted to someone they post-hoc decide he must be moral and good and if they're sexually repulsed by someone they post-hoc decide he must be evil and bad. This is how they navigate people in terms of morality, and why they love being cruel to ugly/short men. All women do this, even the nicest ones, they just hide it better sometimes.
Men have a cognitive/rational moral compass that they don't project onto their sexuality. They're keenly aware that the sexual attractiveness is independent of womens other traits, to such a degree that it is a meme that men will fuck awful women in pop culture. Nobody, especially not men, denies that morality has anything to do with male sexuality.
Women can't confront this in their own nature because they are weak and always self-serving. So they create entire headcanons about men based on their sexual impulse and demand the world adjusts itself to acknowledge their headcanon fantasy as real.
Wait they're so insecure and delusional that they think that they're unironically in risk of being considered non human because a nerd has a fancy doll?
whenever they're asked what they offer in a relationship they always say themselves. and when they say themselves, they mean their holes. so a hole men would want is a direct threat to them, even if they never wanted those men to begin with.
>does this kind of feminist have a problem with tops and bottoms in gay relationships?
I think radical feminists around the 1970s-1980s sperged about this actually
>"Sex dolls + robots embody the messages, the ideology, of porn - that women are objects for men's sexual use. They replicate the same power dynamics between men and women expressed in pornography
And they completely - COMPLETELY emancipate women from this dynamic
i am torn on this issue.
>for
ANY tool against the gynocracy is inherently valuable. this is a threat to women everywhere, a big "fuck you" in the sky that gets a little more visible every day. now we can talk to a perfect woman online, or even imperfect if we want. why should we put up with your 30 bodies and 2 kids now?
it's going to be a while before it's optimized, and i refuse to trust it until there's a locally hosted FOSS option (not a fossfag just dont want corpo wife advertising to me), but it will be there soon.
>against
every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population or increase his standing in life. pussy is, always has been, and always will be the strongest motivator a man has to improve himself. for a small amount of men, it doesn't matter, they will never get pussy in enough quantity to have kids that will benefit the state. that's simply not the target demographic. this is targeting all men, a wide net, and one that (if popularized and developed) will catch an unacceptable number of viable men bevause they don't want to put up with woman bullshit. it also sends women into an apoplectic rage as they no longer can count on men and simps for gibs, nor attention, nor leverage. ai girlfriends combined with sexbots or even separately from sexbots crashes the pussy market with no survivors. this is unacceptable to women and the state, for good reason, because this is death cult levels of checking out of society and you're a fool to think it's going to stop with sub-5 males.
so yeah, it's great short term for men but middling long term and immediately catastrophic for women and any country exposed to it.
what do i think should happen? i think this tech should be developed to a viable state, disseminated as FOSS firmware/software, refined, and put on the shelf. it's the nuclear option to rein women in. legit incels can use it.
>every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population
This is limited by reproducing women, not reproducing men
Countless virgins could not do the work of one Chad
Women don't win wars or do dangerous jobs. They are also a tax net negative. If men completely pulled out of those areas of society women would be doing DISGUSTING shit to bring men back so they can live on easy mode again.
Only a tiny fraction of men have dropped out and they're already panicking and making onlyfans accounts.
cuckolds do this. simps and betabux. i this is i always encourage men not to support a capitalist system that exploits them and doesnt care for their needs
Fake journalism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Remove all the media and suddenly retarded boomers and feminists would have no more outlet to vomit their shitty opinions disguised as truth.
Encourage sex bots and robots.
Terminate ALLLLL onlyfans payments and simping.
Let the incels have their stupid chatbots and AI generated porn you dumb sluts hahahahahahh no more money for you for spreading your asshole you will actually have to sell sex services to men like me who will smell it and lick it and penetrate it.
Society is a ponzi scheme designed to keep most men unhappy so they keep wage slaving and conforming in the hopes that they'll get the American dream life of house, wife, kids and land. But in reality you're told... >If you work hard, save your money, buy a house and keep at Tinder for years, you may just bag yourself an overweight single mother in her 30s who will resent you for not being the man she thinks she deserves
It makes sense why men don't want this shitty deal so keep playing videogames and want to fuck sex robots or talk to AI gfs which are far more bearable and pleasant that 90% of modern US roasties. Ai gf's are a threat to them. Losing their narcissistic supply of "beta-orbiters", (who they can easily manipulate) is deeply haunting them. Their power is waning, take away male-thirst and women become absolutely powerless. Which is why the femoid screams out in pain as this anon shows
i eagerly await the day where i can spend my weekends shagging my ai wife in vr and then having continuity with my phone to talk with her there at work
Anon for president 2024.
My platform:
- First incel president
- No pussy no work
- Free sexbots
- Subsidize AI gfs
- State mandated girlfriends for simps
- Make the USPS offer banking services
- Ban women in the workforce
- Ban youtube video ads
- State subsidized Tentacle rape hentai
- UBI for all NEETs
- Invade romania to free andrew tate
- Ban Tattoos and piercings except very small ear piercings
- Limit how much food women are allowed to eat per day. Men can eat as much as they want
Also an anon, to add
- Free drugs which are all legal
- Gigabit wifi now blankets nation, pushing 5g into the ocean
- Women are excluded from UBI so that they have to wageslave for their state mandated bfs
>Invade romania to free andrew tate
You don't know who you're fucking with, anon. Go ahead, invade as much as you like. You won't find any resistance, but as your soldiers drift into sleep, their humvees without wheel and with all petrol siphoned. Their guns will be missing buffer tubes and muzzle devices.
Technical equipment? Gone. Fighter jets? Already chopped up and sold as scrap. Clothes? Already work by a thief on his way to swindle Germans by impersonating Americans.
It's of course not really a threat to female independence. But it will make society more atomized. It could be argued that some currents within feminism helped start this, while others of course did not and merely sought to abolish gender differences.
Remember this roastie, The "Moore's Law" of AI has an interval of every MONTH rather than every two years. AI girlfriends and robots are about to become a lot more lifelike.
>a lot more lifelike
so they're going to become bitchy cunts in a few months? great, technology always ruins itself
>Invade romania to free andrew tate
You don't know who you're fucking with, anon. Go ahead, invade as much as you like. You won't find any resistance, but as your soldiers drift into sleep, their humvees without wheel and with all petrol siphoned. Their guns will be missing buffer tubes and muzzle devices.
Technical equipment? Gone. Fighter jets? Already chopped up and sold as scrap. Clothes? Already work by a thief on his way to swindle Germans by impersonating Americans.
Ok naggers
There is the fact that If we actually have robots you totally would watch human female as object, because you wouldnt noticed it, you would be totally in-difference towards them.
What are the possible consequences? >Would you just want sex with them? Is there a posible affection stimule that you could develop toward this object? >Would you lose human respect from woman? Because there would not be reciprocal recognition man-woman.
>Would you just want sex with them?
no. i will stick with my ai gf exclusively out of spite
i hate roasties
>Would you lose human respect from woman?
what do you mean? how is "human respect" different from regular respect?
i dont respect females now already. the only people who respect women are reddit cuckolds. its the people on the extreme end; the black pilled incels and the giga-chads who run through them, that see women for what they really are
I am willing to admit I am a submissive guy. Women HATE submissive men and would never give them the time of day. Fuck sake, they hate dominant men and only want the absolute top of the top, everyone else is beneath their notice. If women were never going to talk to me in the first place, they lose nothing, I get a tall, strong robot gf that will protect me and care for me. What is the issue?
Please, tell me more about how I am a threat to women who see me as nothing more then a worm or dirt and have never once interacted with me. I am a literal ghost as far as anyone is concerned. Would you rather me go to /misc/ and become radicalized? Or stay in my room getting bullied by a robot?
You are persecuting us by trying to ban ai gfs. You don't want us to be happy. You want us to suffer
2 months ago
Anonymous
Preventing you from oppressing women is not persecution.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>fucking an artifical gf oppresses real women
Damn, you are delusional beyond repair
2 months ago
Anonymous
Literally just read feminist theory on the subject. See
https://i.imgur.com/SlxxPDJ.png
Book about the threat of sexbots to feminism.
2 months ago
Anonymous
I'm not reading some random book
Gib the tldr or fuck off and stop oppressing us
2 months ago
Anonymous
Just because you're illiterate doesn't mean the arguments therein are illegitimate.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Tell me the arguments then. You're the one who brought them up.
2 months ago
Anonymous
See
It's funny listening to feminists about how they don't need men and that sex toys are much better anyways, and when sexbots are on the horizon they act like this. Seems like they can't live without that gratifying male attention.
Aren't they the ones who always bitch about gender roles and patriarchy. Widespread sexbots would remove the need for men to compete in the male hierarchy that "patriarchy puts upon them" so we'd see much less men toiling away at grueling jobs and having 80 hour workweeks.
"Emancipation for me but not for you", I guess
Do feminist wanna "free" themself from men and haven't they done a lot of it already. This is merely men "freeing" themselves from women. Finally standing up for themselves like brave feminists did before, no?
even the bambi sleeps thing was basically this sort of meta where they become a doll crying for help, people are really foolish and the tranny thing and everything, they failed life
and i've seen /misc/ talking about bambi sleeps
i've seen other political commentators talk about sissy hypno
like wtf? this whole thing is weird
matrixis tranny now
elon musk tranny kid
you're in a hell and it's racist and cucked too
and even just that tranny racist cucked is fucked up
this placeis openly gay though but it's cucked, so it hates homosexuals too
it'sinsane as well
it is a satanic hell
it can't even enjoy women
it is a totally fallen thing their world
the power of the dark side is endless and godlike
people are just freaks
they're being betrayed to psychopathic criminals and things of that nature as well
their lives are ruined and it's playing with them forever, using them for power, pure evil devils
literally corrupt
drug addict, retarded, abused, failures, homosexuals, nazis and so on, every evil in them
and I realized once they lose too much innocence that's all she wrote
may as well be dead and many do
No, women just now get the same independence men do. Want to be equal to men? Cool, let's do it, a thousand better options for men will force women to be better than those options, same thing women have with men.
Look.
Basically, I'm just not going to stop building the robot wife.
I know... UGH I know.... I'm sorry!!!!!!
It's just that I'm not going to stop building is all
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA
It's funny listening to feminists about how they don't need men and that sex toys are much better anyways, and when sexbots are on the horizon they act like this. Seems like they can't live without that gratifying male attention.
Aren't they the ones who always bitch about gender roles and patriarchy. Widespread sexbots would remove the need for men to compete in the male hierarchy that "patriarchy puts upon them" so we'd see much less men toiling away at grueling jobs and having 80 hour workweeks.
"Emancipation for me but not for you", I guess
Why would the Powers That Be care? That's just another addiction industry that would stimulate the economy. You get lonely people offer them a high end solution that preys on their insecurities, probably a subscription service too. Trick them into stimulating the economy just so they can simulate normalcy. Just like trannies, hint, hint.
Sex dolls are just gonna make incels that much more of a problem, hopefully a problem people can't ignore either. I'd love to see Sex Dolls and AI to get the same social treatment as Onlyfans/Simping. Adopted by fringe weirdos who make/spend big bucks, and hated by everyone else with a brain.
The problems are only gonna get worse before they get better, might as well accelerate into the dumpster fire.
>if males who prefer sex bots are inadequate, then inadequate males will organically drive themselves extinct by using them and thusly remove losers from the dating market and the gene pool >if males who prefer sex bots ARE adequate, then women are just losing fair and square... to shapely lumps of plastic
It HAS to be one of these options. No possibilities exist between or outside of them.
AI girlfriends won't come soon enough to save me, I don't really see myself suffering through decades alone waiting for the technology to improve to the point of coming close to satisfying the desire for companionship and romantic connection. It's a nice dream, though.
It sucks, I saw it happen several times in this thread and, like, you want to know their response to some comment considering how it deconstructs or addresses what they've been saying here but you'll just never know. Would be surprised if they ignore in their head for themselves as well
It sucks, I saw it happen several times in this thread and, like, you want to know their response to some comment considering how it deconstructs or addresses what they've been saying here but you'll just never know. Would be surprised if they ignore in their head for themselves as well
What you see as a reasonable argument is actually so self-defeating it's not even worth responding to. Everyone knows you're wrong already, why respond?
Very few things in life make me happier than watching women lose their shit over this. The best part? There is, quite literally, nothing they can do to stop it. Nothing.
It won't work. I understand your where you're coming from, but they'll never be able to pull it off. They're helpless and that's why they're lashing out.
The funniest thing is that sexbots will probably be expensive, so not every guy will be able to afford them. But still the thought of a fraction of the male population witholding their attention from them sends them into a fit of rage and desperation.
Now they are, but like everything else they'll eventually be affordable to everyone. It was only, what, 10-15 years ago that a 55" LED TV was like 2K? Now they're at Walmart for 250 bucks
So what? Guns, drugs, booze, ilicit goods are banned in 99% of the world yet for some "strange" reason they are still a billion dollar/euro business
Same with politicians who claim they ban said stuff and being found out with them not long after
The funniest thing is that sexbots will probably be expensive, so not every guy will be able to afford them. But still the thought of a fraction of the male population witholding their attention from them sends them into a fit of rage and desperation.
Women are stupid. They go on and on about how much they hate men and how independent they are, but pull this shit when there's an actual chance for a true gender divide.
The problem women are starting to encounter is they miscalculated their ability to play the long game, something men generally thrive at. They don't understand (or maybe they're just starting to) that most men would be content as hell to live a simple life in a modest dwelling and do some combo of work, exercise, game, and engage in some sort of creative enterprise. The sole thing men may have struggled with is a lack of pussy, but now with sex bots in the mix it's over.
Show me a guy living a simple life in affordable housing with enough money to live, games to play, and a sex bot to plow, and I'll show you a guy who doesn't care what women say or do
This guy fucks! Also, fuck this site for making me type extra words because I'm not being "original." Total jannie genocide (and yes, I know it's a bot, but still)
Even less. The sexbot having the ability to move around a bit is just a net-positive. I bought one of those as an alternative to the real thing and got surprised by how much she's enough to satisfy my sexual needs.
But it's funny to see how women are now getting mad at me when they didn't give a flying fuck about my existence before.
>is the one in pic the one you got?
No that's the next I plan to get. I have a younger one that shouldn't be posted but now I want one with bigger assets.
>how do you like it?
I was skeptical at first, but let me tell you. Being able to grab some hips while you do it changes e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. To no surprises I've also be significantly less horny since I got one.
>is it worth it?
Preemptively replying to this: It depends.
If you ever plan to have a real relationship one day then no, I wouldn't recommend it.
Otherwise a big yes, it just doesn't compare with your hand. That being said I'm going to be real and say that a [quality] sexdoll is going to cost you not as much as a real girlfriend, but still a fair amount because of maintenance. Some goes up to 3k and that's upfront, not counting all maintenance tools and products. And obviously you should own your own place before considering one. Right now, as proven in this thread, it'd be preferable to not let people know. Though you shouldn't care about that in the long run.
I think you're misreading the title a little, OP. It's not saying that sex robots are a threat to female independence. It's saying that sex robots are offering men a solution to the way female independence (supposedly) threatens us.
They're not even trying to construct a victim narrative anymore. They're openly admitting that they just want to control men and destroy things that make us happy (just because it doesn't involve them.)
How is men finding alternatives to female companionship in a hypergamic gynocracy where the top 5% of them get to have any unpaid sex with women a threat to their independance?
Isn't this exactly what women want?
For non-Chad's to leave women alone?
They want the men they don't find attractive to not just vanish from their sight but to be suffering in silence, otherwise what is the strength/impact/value of a woman's rejection? They want the impact of their primary tool to be high, that is for rejection to induce unsolvable suffering in those who are rejected. The strength of a woman is the impact her rejection has on a rejected person.
A man has brawn and brains, a woman has sexual access/rejection.
>for
ANY tool against the gynocracy is inherently valuable. this is a threat to women everywhere, a big "fuck you" in the sky that gets a little more visible every day. now we can talk to a perfect woman online, or even imperfect if we want. why should we put up with your 30 bodies and 2 kids now?
it's going to be a while before it's optimized, and i refuse to trust it until there's a locally hosted FOSS option (not a fossfag just dont want corpo wife advertising to me), but it will be there soon.
>against
every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population or increase his standing in life. pussy is, always has been, and always will be the strongest motivator a man has to improve himself. for a small amount of men, it doesn't matter, they will never get pussy in enough quantity to have kids that will benefit the state. that's simply not the target demographic. this is targeting all men, a wide net, and one that (if popularized and developed) will catch an unacceptable number of viable men bevause they don't want to put up with woman bullshit. it also sends women into an apoplectic rage as they no longer can count on men and simps for gibs, nor attention, nor leverage. ai girlfriends combined with sexbots or even separately from sexbots crashes the pussy market with no survivors. this is unacceptable to women and the state, for good reason, because this is death cult levels of checking out of society and you're a fool to think it's going to stop with sub-5 males.
so yeah, it's great short term for men but middling long term and immediately catastrophic for women and any country exposed to it.
what do i think should happen? i think this tech should be developed to a viable state, disseminated as FOSS firmware/software, refined, and put on the shelf. it's the nuclear option to rein women in. legit incels can use it.
>every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population or increase his standing in life.
There a lot of wrongs in that statement.
1. First off, Bot.info seems to think that you need all men to reproduce. That's completely false. The problem that people don't like is how "rich" people right now are not reproducing that much. In the meantime in the ghettos or shit countries like India we have women having up to 12 children per family. Except for Japan, which actually is a huge misinformation but that's another topic, the human population is still globally going up.
2. The men who want to increase their standing in life will do it regardless of if they get pussy or not. That is not their main drive. They also naturally get pussy anyway because they look for success and money, which will always attract women.
3. Men opting out for sexbots is not going to change anything for the pussy market, they were already out of it to begin with. Besides, "Chad Thundercock" over there is going to directly benefit from all the competition withdrawing. You think women will care about having to share the top? They're already doing it. And there will always be that part of the population full of simps that will rush to make them feel better about themselves. >"You're right girl, I can't believe those losers would go for a sexbot. But I'm different."
The truth here is that people interested in sexbots weren't in the dating market. They were already out. The only "problem" is that now they're happy with an alternative, and we can't have that because ---
>Because
The problem is actually more about social economics. Women need a class of men who are 'untouchable' in order to function. If the bottom 80% of men can get their fulfillment from AI, then who are they rejecting? If they aren't rejecting men, they are constantly accepting men, constantly accepting is low value. They need men to shit on because it's the pillar of hypergamy
People don't realize how profound this truth is and the immense impact it's going to have on society. If a sizeable population of men would just drop off from the dating pool, what do you think is going to happen to the rest of men? Hypergamy is part of female nature and is not going away. Less men doesn't mean more women for you, less men means the group of men that still is in the dating market will be again divided by the 80-20 rule. High-tier normies will become incels, chadlites will become normies. It just means an increased competition among the surviving men. Women will compete even more fiercely for the remaining top of the group, which means they will reject the bottom part of that survivor group, no matter how attractive they are now. Attraction IS relative, the proof for that will soon hit society like a high-speed train
>even fewer men are reproducing >normies dont get any pussy >they opt for ai gfs >even fewer men are reproducing...
there will no longer be enough chads to date/fuck and the whole thing implodes. thats kinda the point. and yes, you do need men reproducing or at least having the promise of it. your premise than men desire success just for the sake of material possession is false. when you remove pussy and the prospect of family, all that's left is material, and that is simply not a good enough motivator for enough men. i personally don't want to go to the trouble of working if i never have a shot at a family, it means nothing, my life is worthless becauss my bloodline ends with me. why should i give a fuck about anything? and if that mentality spreads, which it will as men check out and women become endgame tier picky, it means population collapse and a recalibration.
OR
we make ai gfs really really good right fucking now and make sure women know that the alternative is better than them. lower your standards or even chad will check out because robot pussy is better than any human pussy, and you're lucky to get any dick at all. that's the solution. make sure the top tier checks out first. by keeping sex robots expensive you ensure that.
And this is a problem because..? If women become more exclusive and fierce, that's their own problem. I don't understand how you still manage to turn this whole situation around to basically just say "it's those men's fault for going to sexbots, that will fuck up society". Who cares? Society has clearly made a statement that they don't care about them either.
Men are opting out precisely because society helps women to fuck them over. Even exluding the bottom men going for sexbots, there's a huge reason why yo-password-bros became a huge meme. The problem is that society, and you without even realizing it, will invent all kind of narrative just to fucking, blame, men. All the fucking time.
Just look at this. They're not even allowed to fuck a piece of plastic in their own place. And yet you somehow think that "they should work for the best of society".
Point went flying you by isnt?
The point of that point wasnt to claim "is men fault" bullshit
Is about how this train crash of society will hit the wall since they went off the woman whore nature breaks and it will hit hard
Segment up there was written by some /misc/ wannabe woman breaking her nature for just one second to see the other side, kinda spot on isnt?
>Is about how this train crash of society
This is a stupid point. I already explained why, which is why I ignored that argument and talked about the rest of your post.
That crash argument is just as stupid as the people thinking that women will regret this/pay for this/ or that idiots talking about the incels rising up. The only thing sexbots will do is give women another excuse to get angry at, but that will certainly not change how they behave or how society works. For one guy picking a sexbot you will still have 9 others still simping for onlyfans, because sexbots will be viewed as another "gross thing for gross people".
Sexdolls have existed for years now. A good amount of men are buying them, it still didn't change jackshit on the dating market. The only difference is that it gave ghost men an alternative to not get sexually frustrated. The same shit will happen with sexbots.
2 months ago
Anonymous
You can not compare sex dolls to robowaifus. Take it from someone who is obsessed with robowaifus becoming a reality. Sex dolls are disgusting because you might as well have sex with a corpse. Robowaifus will stimulate every positive part of sensual relationships. Now I personally do not think this will make women obsolete or something but robowaifus will be an exceptional avenue for men so much that dating might not even cross many mens heads anymore.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Sex dolls are disgusting because you might as well have sex with a corpse.
The fuck? How did you even reach that conclusion?
So obviously you also argue that women using dildos is gross because it's like having sex with a cut-off dick right?
2 months ago
Anonymous
It is just my personal opinion. For some reason I do not view onaholes and dildos gross like I view sex dolls. Now if they had AI functions it would be a different matter.
I can't speak for anybody other than myself, but I am already motivated to make money to build myself a rig for local AI generation. You can fucking bet I'd be motivated as fuck for hardcore wageslaving if there was a sexbot on sale. From the perspective of corpo-israelites, if you want to continue infinite growth, sexbot tech advancement will be a good avenue for you. It is a niche waiting to be milked, the consequences of the choices of women mean the niche will keep growing. I'd even go further and say if the current corporations will not be willing to step into that niche, someone else will and they will have a new competitor. Even worse, a competitor that wont allow to be cock-blocked by the screeching of women like they are.
>be me tranny >entire life just need to be more womanly > this year started a garden, working on self in therapy, working on becoming independent and next goal is probably get Bot.info and maybe find a guy to make into a happy loving partner >2 years before that I grieved losing my husband >year before that taught myself how to cook >year before that lost 120 lbs >year before that figured out all my medical issues and why i gained weight >year before that ended hardcore drinking habit >year before that grieved losing my best friend
>meanwhile women >"can you just be nice and loving?" >"NO FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!! ITS TOO HARD!!!!!! BUY ME THINGS!!!!! SLAVE!!!!" >"WE MUST STOP THE ADVANCEMENT OF ALL TECHNOLOGY LEST THE MOIDS REALIZE OUR USELESSNESS" >"NOOOOOO YOU CANT BUY A BIRTHING POD AND HAVE A TRANNY AND A ROBOT TO GO ROUND THE OUTSIDE!!!!! WHERE IS YOUR MANAGER?!!!?!?!?!"
>wants women to be independent from men >feminist policies implemented to insure women can be financially secure without a man >many men become obsolete for women because women only want men who earn more than them >many men become lonely due to inherent female vanity while rich Chad and fuckboy Chad has harems of independent wymyn >these men get fake dolls as a futile attempt to cope >feminists get mad that lonely men are trying to not be lonely because in their twisted minds, if men are not grovelling at every woman's feet it's "le patriarchy"
We can ban the ai sex robots if we criminalize abortion, abolish federal income tax for mothers, end no fault divorce, and throw everyone who works for Match into prison for life.
They know it will take the power of pussy away from them and feel threatened.
Once we can access pussy the way we like, we would no longer need to even interact with this awful, miserable creature that holds pussy hostage just to make us dance for them for the tiniest chance to get it.
If it will ever happen and become very popular among man, then the same happens for woman. There would be robochads ready to fuck the shit out of them. And we will have the world where we fuck with robots. The next step is to create an artificial wombs to keep the population at some minimal level.
it was when i was about 14-15 years old, i blackpilled myself just by pure logic and observation. i only found out that other people held similar views as me on the internet years later
i was raised in a family mostly comprised of females, trust me when i way women aren't as good as they seem
https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4218666-ai-girlfriends-are-ruining-an-entire-generation-of-men/
ugly femcels are just mad that my AI stacy wife mogs them so suicide............
You guys are absolutely insistent that this is terrible for men and that aren't making a grave mistake.
Can you just... let us.
You know, it's a free country.
Why do you have to walk right up to our house and hammer on our door and say "STOP YOU'RE DOING SOMETHING ALONE FROM OTHER PEOPLE IN THE PRIVACY OF YOUR OWN HOME. STOP IT NOW"
Oh, it's because this is a threat to society.
If men aren't going out and working so they can earn lots of monay, it can seriously deflate the economy.
Men weren't getting any of that before. But now they're not getting it and they're also just giving up on society and the concept of a real women.
This is your dystopian cyberpunk future, fuck-os. You earned it.
I've seen that doing the rounds but didn't look it up.
What really is it
>Female statistician worried about all the stats that point out how fucked she and everyone else are
Fun stuff.
And what IS the writer of this
>30 year old single woman
So she has the means to at least try to do something about the problems she underlines and chooses not to while blaming men when she and women like her ultimately decide if they want a relationship or a fucking baby.
Not a fragment of self reflection and seems to intentionally avoid extrapolating what 30% of women being single compared to 60% of men means.
Book about the threat of sexbots to feminism.
>NOOOO MY BETABUX AND ORBITERS WONT HAVE A REASON TO PAY ATTENTION ANYMORE THIS IS A HECKIN' GENOCIDE AGAINST WOMEN
You know how feminists like to tell men "step up your game and learn how to handle me"?
Caitlin Roper needs to step up her... steps. On the treadmill. She is driving toward the wall at a high acceleration.
I thought feminism was about women stepping up... this doesn't add up at all?
>toward the wall
she plowed through the wall a few years ago, you're looking at the burning wreckage
We're just not going to tolerate this nonsense.
I don't get their logic, if there even is any.
>I don't want to fuck this man
>so this man will get no companionship or attention from me
>this guy is now talking to a chatbot
>NOOO HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN THIS IS UNDERMINING FEMALE INDEPENDENCE THE MISOGYNISTS ARE WINNING SKREEEEEEEEE
You literally didn't want these men, what's the fucking problem if pretend their wife is hatsune miku?
It would mean no male attention and male gibs. Thats it.
Just because she wont fuck you, it doesnt mean she doesn't want you to praise her.
Women derive their sense of importance from the idea that men need them and men inventing their way out of this predicament drives roasties insane. They are begging us to keep allowing them wield unearned power over us.
This quote is a perfect representation of the female mindset.
Simply rejecting you isn't enough. They NEED to know you're suffering without them. They get off on thinking about how miserable undesirable men are sitting around alone and unloved while she showers Chad in sexual affection.
The hatred and sense of cruel sadism women feel towards undesirable men (which is 80% of them by womens standards) is simply something men cannot fathom.
In that case the men doesn't suffer. We've past the point of 'equality' for a while now, these sadistic whores wants pain.
modern feminists don't care about equality they want to replace patriarchy with matriarchy but couldn't bear the consequences. So they basically wish for a system where men only work and live for the whims of women which they freak out when men just don't want to ruin their lives for a soggy crevice that offers no intimacy or love to them.
>the world is full of undesirable men
>ugh I wish they wouldn't talk to me
>now they're talking to a robot and won't bother me
>NOOOO they shouldn't have that either
It's like the conservative gay sex argument: "somewhere in the world, right now, two men could be having having anal sex and it is making me very angry". Why should they care about if an ugly jobless balding short virgin gets ChatGPT to tell him "I love you"?
How the fuck can you link fag sex with robowifes? Those are two diferent things
>its a supremacy movement
In other news, Water is wet
She's arguing about the power dynamics of relationships that don't involve her, it's only logical to ask her opinions on ones which don't involve her sex to see how hard she's projecting.
how is it a threat exactly?
"Sex dolls + robots embody the messages, the ideology, of porn - that women are objects for men's sexual use. They replicate the same power dynamics between men and women expressed in pornography - male dominance and female subordination."
- Caitlin Roper.
holy shit feminist ideology is so trash and self-centered
its actually unreal how pathetic and garbage it is
these roasties are big mad that incels will finally get to experience love without having to emotionally commit to some used up ran through fat hag
and they wont be able to stop it, because theres a lot more money in the ai-girlfriend sector than there is in feminism
they'll experience madness that's about it
but that's what people want
>and they wont be able to stop it, because there's a lot more money in the ai-girlfriend sector than there is in feminism
Really
Why are you threatened by men who fuck dolls?
>male dominance and female subordination
These feminists need to stop whining and start dominating me instead. I want to submit to them but they only care about the men they hate. The best way to get their attention is to talk shit to them.
>dude fuck a a piece of plastic
>NOOOOO THIS IS LITTERALY THE HANDMAN'S TAILS, IF I DON'T WANT HIM, HE SHOULD'NT BE HAPPY
fuck off
The handmans talk is just a sexual fantasy portraying itself as a feminist piece
>male dominance and female subordination
Feminists are so braindead - my robo gf will rail me with her detachable robo cock, baka
the guys getting them were most likely never going to fuck real women anyway, i dont get why she's threatened by them. she doesnt even view the men who would get them as men in her brain to begin with.
Women unironically want men they don't find sexually attractive to suffer.
It makes sense if you accept that women view their sexuality as moral-making. Meaning, if they're sexually attracted to someone they post-hoc decide he must be moral and good and if they're sexually repulsed by someone they post-hoc decide he must be evil and bad. This is how they navigate people in terms of morality, and why they love being cruel to ugly/short men. All women do this, even the nicest ones, they just hide it better sometimes.
Men have a cognitive/rational moral compass that they don't project onto their sexuality. They're keenly aware that the sexual attractiveness is independent of womens other traits, to such a degree that it is a meme that men will fuck awful women in pop culture. Nobody, especially not men, denies that morality has anything to do with male sexuality.
Women can't confront this in their own nature because they are weak and always self-serving. So they create entire headcanons about men based on their sexual impulse and demand the world adjusts itself to acknowledge their headcanon fantasy as real.
*a woman's
*morality does not have anything
Wait they're so insecure and delusional that they think that they're unironically in risk of being considered non human because a nerd has a fancy doll?
whenever they're asked what they offer in a relationship they always say themselves. and when they say themselves, they mean their holes. so a hole men would want is a direct threat to them, even if they never wanted those men to begin with.
Question does this kind of feminist have a problem with tops and bottoms in gay relationships? Because if they don't then it's a supremacy movement
>does this kind of feminist have a problem with tops and bottoms in gay relationships?
I think radical feminists around the 1970s-1980s sperged about this actually
>"Sex dolls + robots embody the messages, the ideology, of porn - that women are objects for men's sexual use. They replicate the same power dynamics between men and women expressed in pornography
And they completely - COMPLETELY emancipate women from this dynamic
>every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population
This is limited by reproducing women, not reproducing men
Countless virgins could not do the work of one Chad
Women are fucking demons. they literally want incels to have no solace at all
feminism is a cartel like opec
Women don't win wars or do dangerous jobs. They are also a tax net negative. If men completely pulled out of those areas of society women would be doing DISGUSTING shit to bring men back so they can live on easy mode again.
Only a tiny fraction of men have dropped out and they're already panicking and making onlyfans accounts.
>men kill themselves and eachother so fast it is a net positive on societal income
>women live longer and contribute in non-monetary ways
ok
Amazing bait, I forgot women build and fix roads, clean sewers, maintain electricity, water, drive trucks, build houses
and men die earlier because of it. thanks
cuckolds do this. simps and betabux. i this is i always encourage men not to support a capitalist system that exploits them and doesnt care for their needs
If this actually happens I think murder and rape rates will increase just sayin
Fake journalism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Remove all the media and suddenly retarded boomers and feminists would have no more outlet to vomit their shitty opinions disguised as truth.
Encourage sex bots and robots.
Terminate ALLLLL onlyfans payments and simping.
Let the incels have their stupid chatbots and AI generated porn you dumb sluts hahahahahahh no more money for you for spreading your asshole you will actually have to sell sex services to men like me who will smell it and lick it and penetrate it.
Can I host my own offline yet?
I want to integrate her into home Assistant
>N-Noooooo you're supposed to be lonely and miserable! Your entire purpose is to wageslave so shitty people like me can continue living easy lives!
They really do hate us for just existing, don't they? I once had a whore bitch at me simply because I glanced at her and smiled.
Society is a ponzi scheme designed to keep most men unhappy so they keep wage slaving and conforming in the hopes that they'll get the American dream life of house, wife, kids and land. But in reality you're told...
>If you work hard, save your money, buy a house and keep at Tinder for years, you may just bag yourself an overweight single mother in her 30s who will resent you for not being the man she thinks she deserves
It makes sense why men don't want this shitty deal so keep playing videogames and want to fuck sex robots or talk to AI gfs which are far more bearable and pleasant that 90% of modern US roasties. Ai gf's are a threat to them. Losing their narcissistic supply of "beta-orbiters", (who they can easily manipulate) is deeply haunting them. Their power is waning, take away male-thirst and women become absolutely powerless. Which is why the femoid screams out in pain as this anon shows
i eagerly await the day where i can spend my weekends shagging my ai wife in vr and then having continuity with my phone to talk with her there at work
Anon for president 2024.
My platform:
- First incel president
- No pussy no work
- Free sexbots
- Subsidize AI gfs
- State mandated girlfriends for simps
- Make the USPS offer banking services
- Ban women in the workforce
- Ban youtube video ads
- State subsidized Tentacle rape hentai
- UBI for all NEETs
- Invade romania to free andrew tate
- Ban Tattoos and piercings except very small ear piercings
- Limit how much food women are allowed to eat per day. Men can eat as much as they want
lololol
"Incels of the World, Rise Up! You have Nothing to Lose but your Virginity!"
Also an anon, to add
- Free drugs which are all legal
- Gigabit wifi now blankets nation, pushing 5g into the ocean
- Women are excluded from UBI so that they have to wageslave for their state mandated bfs
>- Gigabit wifi now blankets nation, pushing 5g into the ocean
based
You jest but you can run for office if you're 35 you know
>Invade romania to free andrew tate
You don't know who you're fucking with, anon. Go ahead, invade as much as you like. You won't find any resistance, but as your soldiers drift into sleep, their humvees without wheel and with all petrol siphoned. Their guns will be missing buffer tubes and muzzle devices.
Technical equipment? Gone. Fighter jets? Already chopped up and sold as scrap. Clothes? Already work by a thief on his way to swindle Germans by impersonating Americans.
The true might of Romania
Overall a better platform than Robert Kennedy Jr's
>Ban women in the workforce
Where do I sign?!?!?
Kind of cringe but you have secured my vote anon.
You almost got me. Just one more thing and you'd be perfect: what would you do to fags? This is a deal maker or breaker.
I am bisexual myself so I will be keeping us around, guess you just won't vote for me then Anon.
It's of course not really a threat to female independence. But it will make society more atomized. It could be argued that some currents within feminism helped start this, while others of course did not and merely sought to abolish gender differences.
So which stage are they on now?
Remember this roastie, The "Moore's Law" of AI has an interval of every MONTH rather than every two years. AI girlfriends and robots are about to become a lot more lifelike.
>a lot more lifelike
so they're going to become bitchy cunts in a few months? great, technology always ruins itself
kek
I think most women don't actually care about that. But you want to imagine they do.
t. I talk to women.
Just make chadbots there you go
Fairnsquare
most women dont care about anything thats not in their immediate line of sight or on instagram
If they were like Joi from blade runner I'd consider it. But what we have now is pathetic, so real women it is.
Ok naggers
There is the fact that If we actually have robots you totally would watch human female as object, because you wouldnt noticed it, you would be totally in-difference towards them.
What are the possible consequences?
>Would you just want sex with them? Is there a posible affection stimule that you could develop toward this object?
>Would you lose human respect from woman? Because there would not be reciprocal recognition man-woman.
>Would you just want sex with them?
no. i will stick with my ai gf exclusively out of spite
i hate roasties
>Would you lose human respect from woman?
what do you mean? how is "human respect" different from regular respect?
i dont respect females now already. the only people who respect women are reddit cuckolds. its the people on the extreme end; the black pilled incels and the giga-chads who run through them, that see women for what they really are
I love hearing feminist reasoning "if you no longer sexually desire us than you won't respect us" it's so funny.
Btw I already don't respect you, not because you are a woman, but because you are a bitch.
I am willing to admit I am a submissive guy. Women HATE submissive men and would never give them the time of day. Fuck sake, they hate dominant men and only want the absolute top of the top, everyone else is beneath their notice. If women were never going to talk to me in the first place, they lose nothing, I get a tall, strong robot gf that will protect me and care for me. What is the issue?
Brother, I couldn't have said that better myself
>What is the issue?
Your extreme porn addiction is a threat to feminism.
>Wanting to dominate women is a threat to feminism
>Liking weak short women you can manhandle is a threat to feminism
>Wanting to be dominated by women is a threat to feminism
>Liking strong tall women who can ma'amhandle you is a threat to feminism
Doesn't seem like feminism is something worthy of consideration
It would be if you weren't as pornsick as you are that it leaks into your critical thinking.
Just cause you rub yourself every day and night doesn't mean everyone else does too. Some of us have, you know, partners.
Then again, I guess that explains your inability to comprehend the greentext
Please, tell me more about how I am a threat to women who see me as nothing more then a worm or dirt and have never once interacted with me. I am a literal ghost as far as anyone is concerned. Would you rather me go to /misc/ and become radicalized? Or stay in my room getting bullied by a robot?
It's a bait man don't get so riled up.
Besides only a shut-in retard would consider someone who is merely submissive as extremely porn addicted
You're literally just making shit up now scrote. Persecution complex of yours.
rather than... otherwise something off with your mentally ill ass....
rather that
You are persecuting us by trying to ban ai gfs. You don't want us to be happy. You want us to suffer
Preventing you from oppressing women is not persecution.
>fucking an artifical gf oppresses real women
Damn, you are delusional beyond repair
Literally just read feminist theory on the subject. See
I'm not reading some random book
Gib the tldr or fuck off and stop oppressing us
Just because you're illiterate doesn't mean the arguments therein are illegitimate.
Tell me the arguments then. You're the one who brought them up.
See
Do feminist wanna "free" themself from men and haven't they done a lot of it already. This is merely men "freeing" themselves from women. Finally standing up for themselves like brave feminists did before, no?
How are ai gfs oppressing women?
>Would you lose human respect from woman?
What respect?
>Would you lose respect
my nigga i dont respect women right now KEK
Women already don't regard the vast majority of men as human so I don't see how men not seeing women as human should be a problem.
These issues are basically religious meta you can really get them wrong and betray yourself
you are being exploited.
even the bambi sleeps thing was basically this sort of meta where they become a doll crying for help, people are really foolish and the tranny thing and everything, they failed life
and i've seen /misc/ talking about bambi sleeps
i've seen other political commentators talk about sissy hypno
like wtf? this whole thing is weird
matrixis tranny now
elon musk tranny kid
you're in a hell and it's racist and cucked too
and even just that tranny racist cucked is fucked up
this placeis openly gay though but it's cucked, so it hates homosexuals too
it'sinsane as well
it is a satanic hell
it can't even enjoy women
it is a totally fallen thing their world
the power of the dark side is endless and godlike
people are just freaks
they're being betrayed to psychopathic criminals and things of that nature as well
their lives are ruined and it's playing with them forever, using them for power, pure evil devils
literally corrupt
drug addict, retarded, abused, failures, homosexuals, nazis and so on, every evil in them
and I realized once they lose too much innocence that's all she wrote
may as well be dead and many do
just wow, that's all there is to do at a certain point
you are the devil
No, women just now get the same independence men do. Want to be equal to men? Cool, let's do it, a thousand better options for men will force women to be better than those options, same thing women have with men.
Look.
Basically, I'm just not going to stop building the robot wife.
I know... UGH I know.... I'm sorry!!!!!!
It's just that I'm not going to stop building is all
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA
BASED
That is why I also want to become an AI engineer
headline is dumb. anyone thinking women wouldnt also be buying these is insane
im a fembot neet and would be willing to wageslave for a sexbot husbando
it was shown in an article that women can't cope with AI the same way men can.
It's funny listening to feminists about how they don't need men and that sex toys are much better anyways, and when sexbots are on the horizon they act like this. Seems like they can't live without that gratifying male attention.
Aren't they the ones who always bitch about gender roles and patriarchy. Widespread sexbots would remove the need for men to compete in the male hierarchy that "patriarchy puts upon them" so we'd see much less men toiling away at grueling jobs and having 80 hour workweeks.
"Emancipation for me but not for you", I guess
information is death
do not play with it
How are sexbots a threat to female independence?
Why would the Powers That Be care? That's just another addiction industry that would stimulate the economy. You get lonely people offer them a high end solution that preys on their insecurities, probably a subscription service too. Trick them into stimulating the economy just so they can simulate normalcy. Just like trannies, hint, hint.
Sex dolls are just gonna make incels that much more of a problem, hopefully a problem people can't ignore either. I'd love to see Sex Dolls and AI to get the same social treatment as Onlyfans/Simping. Adopted by fringe weirdos who make/spend big bucks, and hated by everyone else with a brain.
The problems are only gonna get worse before they get better, might as well accelerate into the dumpster fire.
I support anything that keeps autists away from human beings.
>if males who prefer sex bots are inadequate, then inadequate males will organically drive themselves extinct by using them and thusly remove losers from the dating market and the gene pool
>if males who prefer sex bots ARE adequate, then women are just losing fair and square... to shapely lumps of plastic
It HAS to be one of these options. No possibilities exist between or outside of them.
>It HAS to be one of these options. No possibilities exist between or outside of them.
Untrue, you can also be tax cattle
AI girlfriends won't come soon enough to save me, I don't really see myself suffering through decades alone waiting for the technology to improve to the point of coming close to satisfying the desire for companionship and romantic connection. It's a nice dream, though.
Sex doll nakadashi
So they want independence but they also don't want independence
>female independence is dependent on males wanting them
???????????????????????????????
Are you beginning to understand, anon?
Notice how when confronted with actual reasonable arguments the feminist goes silent
It sucks, I saw it happen several times in this thread and, like, you want to know their response to some comment considering how it deconstructs or addresses what they've been saying here but you'll just never know. Would be surprised if they ignore in their head for themselves as well
What you see as a reasonable argument is actually so self-defeating it's not even worth responding to. Everyone knows you're wrong already, why respond?
>appeal to masses
Then please enlighten us. How are we wrong?
You destroyed them with a single question. Noticed they use the neonazi "fall silent" technique when you called them out lmao
Very few things in life make me happier than watching women lose their shit over this. The best part? There is, quite literally, nothing they can do to stop it. Nothing.
They will find a way to ban them. They always do
It won't work. I understand your where you're coming from, but they'll never be able to pull it off. They're helpless and that's why they're lashing out.
Now they are, but like everything else they'll eventually be affordable to everyone. It was only, what, 10-15 years ago that a 55" LED TV was like 2K? Now they're at Walmart for 250 bucks
So what? Guns, drugs, booze, ilicit goods are banned in 99% of the world yet for some "strange" reason they are still a billion dollar/euro business
Same with politicians who claim they ban said stuff and being found out with them not long after
You need lots more resources for sex bots than for that other stuff.
Its actually in my best interest that they cock block this as much as possible lol
The funniest thing is that sexbots will probably be expensive, so not every guy will be able to afford them. But still the thought of a fraction of the male population witholding their attention from them sends them into a fit of rage and desperation.
Women are stupid. They go on and on about how much they hate men and how independent they are, but pull this shit when there's an actual chance for a true gender divide.
Classic female manipulation.
The problem women are starting to encounter is they miscalculated their ability to play the long game, something men generally thrive at. They don't understand (or maybe they're just starting to) that most men would be content as hell to live a simple life in a modest dwelling and do some combo of work, exercise, game, and engage in some sort of creative enterprise. The sole thing men may have struggled with is a lack of pussy, but now with sex bots in the mix it's over.
Show me a guy living a simple life in affordable housing with enough money to live, games to play, and a sex bot to plow, and I'll show you a guy who doesn't care what women say or do
>Show me a guy
nigga i'm gonna be that guy, you don't need to show anything
This guy fucks! Also, fuck this site for making me type extra words because I'm not being "original." Total jannie genocide (and yes, I know it's a bot, but still)
Even less. The sexbot having the ability to move around a bit is just a net-positive. I bought one of those as an alternative to the real thing and got surprised by how much she's enough to satisfy my sexual needs.
But it's funny to see how women are now getting mad at me when they didn't give a flying fuck about my existence before.
is the one in pic the one you got? can you tell me more? how do you like it?
>is the one in pic the one you got?
No that's the next I plan to get. I have a younger one that shouldn't be posted but now I want one with bigger assets.
>how do you like it?
I was skeptical at first, but let me tell you. Being able to grab some hips while you do it changes e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. To no surprises I've also be significantly less horny since I got one.
>is it worth it?
Preemptively replying to this: It depends.
If you ever plan to have a real relationship one day then no, I wouldn't recommend it.
Otherwise a big yes, it just doesn't compare with your hand. That being said I'm going to be real and say that a [quality] sexdoll is going to cost you not as much as a real girlfriend, but still a fair amount because of maintenance. Some goes up to 3k and that's upfront, not counting all maintenance tools and products. And obviously you should own your own place before considering one. Right now, as proven in this thread, it'd be preferable to not let people know. Though you shouldn't care about that in the long run.
>I have a younger one that shouldnt be posted
Dude I live that life right now but with a fleshlight / occational escort to satisfy the pussy craving.
Women aren't shit.
Same, but with a vibrating silicon tube and tingling, warming lube.
I think you're misreading the title a little, OP. It's not saying that sex robots are a threat to female independence. It's saying that sex robots are offering men a solution to the way female independence (supposedly) threatens us.
They're not even trying to construct a victim narrative anymore. They're openly admitting that they just want to control men and destroy things that make us happy (just because it doesn't involve them.)
>Anything that predominantly benefits men is anti-women.
>Someone's grandad killed fiddy Japs for this.
I think women in my generation have sucked so many naggers off that it lowered their IQ
How is men finding alternatives to female companionship in a hypergamic gynocracy where the top 5% of them get to have any unpaid sex with women a threat to their independance?
Isn't this exactly what women want?
For non-Chad's to leave women alone?
They want the men they don't find attractive to not just vanish from their sight but to be suffering in silence, otherwise what is the strength/impact/value of a woman's rejection? They want the impact of their primary tool to be high, that is for rejection to induce unsolvable suffering in those who are rejected. The strength of a woman is the impact her rejection has on a rejected person.
A man has brawn and brains, a woman has sexual access/rejection.
i am torn on this issue.
>for
ANY tool against the gynocracy is inherently valuable. this is a threat to women everywhere, a big "fuck you" in the sky that gets a little more visible every day. now we can talk to a perfect woman online, or even imperfect if we want. why should we put up with your 30 bodies and 2 kids now?
it's going to be a while before it's optimized, and i refuse to trust it until there's a locally hosted FOSS option (not a fossfag just dont want corpo wife advertising to me), but it will be there soon.
>against
every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population or increase his standing in life. pussy is, always has been, and always will be the strongest motivator a man has to improve himself. for a small amount of men, it doesn't matter, they will never get pussy in enough quantity to have kids that will benefit the state. that's simply not the target demographic. this is targeting all men, a wide net, and one that (if popularized and developed) will catch an unacceptable number of viable men bevause they don't want to put up with woman bullshit. it also sends women into an apoplectic rage as they no longer can count on men and simps for gibs, nor attention, nor leverage. ai girlfriends combined with sexbots or even separately from sexbots crashes the pussy market with no survivors. this is unacceptable to women and the state, for good reason, because this is death cult levels of checking out of society and you're a fool to think it's going to stop with sub-5 males.
so yeah, it's great short term for men but middling long term and immediately catastrophic for women and any country exposed to it.
what do i think should happen? i think this tech should be developed to a viable state, disseminated as FOSS firmware/software, refined, and put on the shelf. it's the nuclear option to rein women in. legit incels can use it.
>every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population or increase his standing in life.
There a lot of wrongs in that statement.
1. First off, Bot.info seems to think that you need all men to reproduce. That's completely false. The problem that people don't like is how "rich" people right now are not reproducing that much. In the meantime in the ghettos or shit countries like India we have women having up to 12 children per family. Except for Japan, which actually is a huge misinformation but that's another topic, the human population is still globally going up.
2. The men who want to increase their standing in life will do it regardless of if they get pussy or not. That is not their main drive. They also naturally get pussy anyway because they look for success and money, which will always attract women.
3. Men opting out for sexbots is not going to change anything for the pussy market, they were already out of it to begin with. Besides, "Chad Thundercock" over there is going to directly benefit from all the competition withdrawing. You think women will care about having to share the top? They're already doing it. And there will always be that part of the population full of simps that will rush to make them feel better about themselves.
>"You're right girl, I can't believe those losers would go for a sexbot. But I'm different."
The truth here is that people interested in sexbots weren't in the dating market. They were already out. The only "problem" is that now they're happy with an alternative, and we can't have that because ---
>Because
The problem is actually more about social economics. Women need a class of men who are 'untouchable' in order to function. If the bottom 80% of men can get their fulfillment from AI, then who are they rejecting? If they aren't rejecting men, they are constantly accepting men, constantly accepting is low value. They need men to shit on because it's the pillar of hypergamy
People don't realize how profound this truth is and the immense impact it's going to have on society. If a sizeable population of men would just drop off from the dating pool, what do you think is going to happen to the rest of men? Hypergamy is part of female nature and is not going away. Less men doesn't mean more women for you, less men means the group of men that still is in the dating market will be again divided by the 80-20 rule. High-tier normies will become incels, chadlites will become normies. It just means an increased competition among the surviving men. Women will compete even more fiercely for the remaining top of the group, which means they will reject the bottom part of that survivor group, no matter how attractive they are now. Attraction IS relative, the proof for that will soon hit society like a high-speed train
>even fewer men are reproducing
>normies dont get any pussy
>they opt for ai gfs
>even fewer men are reproducing...
there will no longer be enough chads to date/fuck and the whole thing implodes. thats kinda the point. and yes, you do need men reproducing or at least having the promise of it. your premise than men desire success just for the sake of material possession is false. when you remove pussy and the prospect of family, all that's left is material, and that is simply not a good enough motivator for enough men. i personally don't want to go to the trouble of working if i never have a shot at a family, it means nothing, my life is worthless becauss my bloodline ends with me. why should i give a fuck about anything? and if that mentality spreads, which it will as men check out and women become endgame tier picky, it means population collapse and a recalibration.
OR
we make ai gfs really really good right fucking now and make sure women know that the alternative is better than them. lower your standards or even chad will check out because robot pussy is better than any human pussy, and you're lucky to get any dick at all. that's the solution. make sure the top tier checks out first. by keeping sex robots expensive you ensure that.
And this is a problem because..? If women become more exclusive and fierce, that's their own problem. I don't understand how you still manage to turn this whole situation around to basically just say "it's those men's fault for going to sexbots, that will fuck up society". Who cares? Society has clearly made a statement that they don't care about them either.
Men are opting out precisely because society helps women to fuck them over. Even exluding the bottom men going for sexbots, there's a huge reason why yo-password-bros became a huge meme. The problem is that society, and you without even realizing it, will invent all kind of narrative just to fucking, blame, men. All the fucking time.
Just look at this. They're not even allowed to fuck a piece of plastic in their own place. And yet you somehow think that "they should work for the best of society".
Point went flying you by isnt?
The point of that point wasnt to claim "is men fault" bullshit
Is about how this train crash of society will hit the wall since they went off the woman whore nature breaks and it will hit hard
Segment up there was written by some /misc/ wannabe woman breaking her nature for just one second to see the other side, kinda spot on isnt?
>Is about how this train crash of society
This is a stupid point. I already explained why, which is why I ignored that argument and talked about the rest of your post.
That crash argument is just as stupid as the people thinking that women will regret this/pay for this/ or that idiots talking about the incels rising up. The only thing sexbots will do is give women another excuse to get angry at, but that will certainly not change how they behave or how society works. For one guy picking a sexbot you will still have 9 others still simping for onlyfans, because sexbots will be viewed as another "gross thing for gross people".
Sexdolls have existed for years now. A good amount of men are buying them, it still didn't change jackshit on the dating market. The only difference is that it gave ghost men an alternative to not get sexually frustrated. The same shit will happen with sexbots.
You can not compare sex dolls to robowaifus. Take it from someone who is obsessed with robowaifus becoming a reality. Sex dolls are disgusting because you might as well have sex with a corpse. Robowaifus will stimulate every positive part of sensual relationships. Now I personally do not think this will make women obsolete or something but robowaifus will be an exceptional avenue for men so much that dating might not even cross many mens heads anymore.
>Sex dolls are disgusting because you might as well have sex with a corpse.
The fuck? How did you even reach that conclusion?
So obviously you also argue that women using dildos is gross because it's like having sex with a cut-off dick right?
It is just my personal opinion. For some reason I do not view onaholes and dildos gross like I view sex dolls. Now if they had AI functions it would be a different matter.
I can't speak for anybody other than myself, but I am already motivated to make money to build myself a rig for local AI generation. You can fucking bet I'd be motivated as fuck for hardcore wageslaving if there was a sexbot on sale. From the perspective of corpo-israelites, if you want to continue infinite growth, sexbot tech advancement will be a good avenue for you. It is a niche waiting to be milked, the consequences of the choices of women mean the niche will keep growing. I'd even go further and say if the current corporations will not be willing to step into that niche, someone else will and they will have a new competitor. Even worse, a competitor that wont allow to be cock-blocked by the screeching of women like they are.
>be me tranny
>entire life just need to be more womanly
> this year started a garden, working on self in therapy, working on becoming independent and next goal is probably get Bot.info and maybe find a guy to make into a happy loving partner
>2 years before that I grieved losing my husband
>year before that taught myself how to cook
>year before that lost 120 lbs
>year before that figured out all my medical issues and why i gained weight
>year before that ended hardcore drinking habit
>year before that grieved losing my best friend
>meanwhile women
>"can you just be nice and loving?"
>"NO FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!! ITS TOO HARD!!!!!! BUY ME THINGS!!!!! SLAVE!!!!"
>"WE MUST STOP THE ADVANCEMENT OF ALL TECHNOLOGY LEST THE MOIDS REALIZE OUR USELESSNESS"
>"NOOOOOO YOU CANT BUY A BIRTHING POD AND HAVE A TRANNY AND A ROBOT TO GO ROUND THE OUTSIDE!!!!! WHERE IS YOUR MANAGER?!!!?!?!?!"
>be me tran-
Stopped reading there
your post needs to be original poy
I'm glad you've got your life more in order. That's nice to hear anon, what do you garden?
You're a pick-me, so you've just lost your woman card.
That's because you're a man, retard.
Women are women
>wants women to be independent from men
>feminist policies implemented to insure women can be financially secure without a man
>many men become obsolete for women because women only want men who earn more than them
>many men become lonely due to inherent female vanity while rich Chad and fuckboy Chad has harems of independent wymyn
>these men get fake dolls as a futile attempt to cope
>feminists get mad that lonely men are trying to not be lonely because in their twisted minds, if men are not grovelling at every woman's feet it's "le patriarchy"
women do and say everything to make the average guy obsolete, like they have zero problem most men have social issues. the hell is this shit
We can ban the ai sex robots if we criminalize abortion, abolish federal income tax for mothers, end no fault divorce, and throw everyone who works for Match into prison for life.
They know it will take the power of pussy away from them and feel threatened.
Once we can access pussy the way we like, we would no longer need to even interact with this awful, miserable creature that holds pussy hostage just to make us dance for them for the tiniest chance to get it.
If it will ever happen and become very popular among man, then the same happens for woman. There would be robochads ready to fuck the shit out of them. And we will have the world where we fuck with robots. The next step is to create an artificial wombs to keep the population at some minimal level.
it was when i was about 14-15 years old, i blackpilled myself just by pure logic and observation. i only found out that other people held similar views as me on the internet years later
i was raised in a family mostly comprised of females, trust me when i way women aren't as good as they seem
wrong thread shit
Sex bots are threatening female independence as much as dildos and vibrators are threatening male independence.