Ban Sexbots and AI Girlfriends

Why shouldn't sex robots be banned on the grounds they're a threat to women's independence?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4218666-ai-girlfriends-are-ruining-an-entire-generation-of-men/

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/SlxxPDJ.png

      Book about the threat of sexbots to feminism.

      https://i.imgur.com/UrA2rGb.jpg

      We're just not going to tolerate this nonsense.

      ugly femcels are just mad that my AI stacy wife mogs them so suicide............

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/SlxxPDJ.png

      Book about the threat of sexbots to feminism.

      https://i.imgur.com/UrA2rGb.jpg

      We're just not going to tolerate this nonsense.

      You guys are absolutely insistent that this is terrible for men and that aren't making a grave mistake.

      Can you just... let us.
      You know, it's a free country.
      Why do you have to walk right up to our house and hammer on our door and say "STOP YOU'RE DOING SOMETHING ALONE FROM OTHER PEOPLE IN THE PRIVACY OF YOUR OWN HOME. STOP IT NOW"

      Oh, it's because this is a threat to society.
      If men aren't going out and working so they can earn lots of monay, it can seriously deflate the economy.

      Men weren't getting any of that before. But now they're not getting it and they're also just giving up on society and the concept of a real women.

      This is your dystopian cyberpunk future, frick-os. You earned it.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I've seen that doing the rounds but didn't look it up.
      What really is it
      >Female statistician worried about all the stats that point out how fricked she and everyone else are
      Fun stuff.
      And what IS the writer of this
      >30 year old single woman
      So she has the means to at least try to do something about the problems she underlines and chooses not to while blaming men when she and women like her ultimately decide if they want a relationship or a fricking baby.
      Not a fragment of self reflection and seems to intentionally avoid extrapolating what 30% of women being single compared to 60% of men means.

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Book about the threat of sexbots to feminism.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >NOOOO MY BETABUX AND ORBITERS WONT HAVE A REASON TO PAY ATTENTION ANYMORE THIS IS A HECKIN' GENOCIDE AGAINST WOMEN

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      You know how feminists like to tell men "step up your game and learn how to handle me"?
      Caitlin Roper needs to step up her... steps. On the treadmill. She is driving toward the wall at a high acceleration.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        I thought feminism was about women stepping up... this doesn't add up at all?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >toward the wall
        she plowed through the wall a few years ago, you're looking at the burning wreckage

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    We're just not going to tolerate this nonsense.

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't get their logic, if there even is any.
    >I don't want to frick this man
    >so this man will get no companionship or attention from me
    >this guy is now talking to a chatbot
    >NOOO HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN THIS IS UNDERMINING FEMALE INDEPENDENCE THE MISOGYNISTS ARE WINNING SKREEEEEEEEE
    You literally didn't want these men, what's the fricking problem if pretend their wife is hatsune miku?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      It would mean no male attention and male gibs. Thats it.
      Just because she wont frick you, it doesnt mean she doesn't want you to praise her.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Women derive their sense of importance from the idea that men need them and men inventing their way out of this predicament drives roasties insane. They are begging us to keep allowing them wield unearned power over us.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      This quote is a perfect representation of the female mindset.
      Simply rejecting you isn't enough. They NEED to know you're suffering without them. They get off on thinking about how miserable undesirable men are sitting around alone and unloved while she showers Chad in sexual affection.
      The hatred and sense of cruel sadism women feel towards undesirable men (which is 80% of them by womens standards) is simply something men cannot fathom.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      In that case the men doesn't suffer. We've past the point of 'equality' for a while now, these sadistic prostitutes wants pain.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      modern feminists don't care about equality they want to replace patriarchy with matriarchy but couldn't bear the consequences. So they basically wish for a system where men only work and live for the whims of women which they freak out when men just don't want to ruin their lives for a soggy crevice that offers no intimacy or love to them.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the world is full of undesirable men
      >ugh I wish they wouldn't talk to me
      >now they're talking to a robot and won't bother me
      >NOOOO they shouldn't have that either

      It's like the conservative gay sex argument: "somewhere in the world, right now, two men could be having having anal sex and it is making me very angry". Why should they care about if an ugly jobless balding short virgin gets ChatGPT to tell him "I love you"?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Question does this kind of feminist have a problem with tops and bottoms in gay relationships? Because if they don't then it's a supremacy movement

        How the frick can you link gay sex with robowifes? Those are two diferent things
        >its a supremacy movement
        In other news, Water is wet

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          She's arguing about the power dynamics of relationships that don't involve her, it's only logical to ask her opinions on ones which don't involve her sex to see how hard she's projecting.

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    how is it a threat exactly?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      "Sex dolls + robots embody the messages, the ideology, of porn - that women are objects for men's sexual use. They replicate the same power dynamics between men and women expressed in pornography - male dominance and female subordination."
      - Caitlin Roper.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        holy shit feminist ideology is so trash and self-centered
        its actually unreal how pathetic and garbage it is

        these roasties are big mad that incels will finally get to experience love without having to emotionally commit to some used up ran through fat hag

        and they wont be able to stop it, because theres a lot more money in the ai-girlfriend sector than there is in feminism

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          they'll experience madness that's about it
          but that's what people want

        • 8 months ago
          robotwaifutechnician

          >and they wont be able to stop it, because there's a lot more money in the ai-girlfriend sector than there is in feminism
          Really

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why are you threatened by men who frick dolls?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >male dominance and female subordination
        These feminists need to stop whining and start dominating me instead. I want to submit to them but they only care about the men they hate. The best way to get their attention is to talk shit to them.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >dude frick a a piece of plastic
        >NOOOOO THIS IS LITTERALY THE HANDMAN'S TAILS, IF I DON'T WANT HIM, HE SHOULD'NT BE HAPPY
        frick off

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          The handmans talk is just a sexual fantasy portraying itself as a feminist piece

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >male dominance and female subordination
        Feminists are so braindead - my robo gf will rail me with her detachable robo wiener, baka

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        the guys getting them were most likely never going to frick real women anyway, i dont get why she's threatened by them. she doesnt even view the men who would get them as men in her brain to begin with.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Women unironically want men they don't find sexually attractive to suffer.

          It makes sense if you accept that women view their sexuality as moral-making. Meaning, if they're sexually attracted to someone they post-hoc decide he must be moral and good and if they're sexually repulsed by someone they post-hoc decide he must be evil and bad. This is how they navigate people in terms of morality, and why they love being cruel to ugly/short men. All women do this, even the nicest ones, they just hide it better sometimes.

          Men have a cognitive/rational moral compass that they don't project onto their sexuality. They're keenly aware that the sexual attractiveness is independent of womens other traits, to such a degree that it is a meme that men will frick awful women in pop culture. Nobody, especially not men, denies that morality has anything to do with male sexuality.

          Women can't confront this in their own nature because they are weak and always self-serving. So they create entire headcanons about men based on their sexual impulse and demand the world adjusts itself to acknowledge their headcanon fantasy as real.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            *a woman's
            *morality does not have anything

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wait they're so insecure and delusional that they think that they're unironically in risk of being considered non human because a nerd has a fancy doll?

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          whenever they're asked what they offer in a relationship they always say themselves. and when they say themselves, they mean their holes. so a hole men would want is a direct threat to them, even if they never wanted those men to begin with.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Question does this kind of feminist have a problem with tops and bottoms in gay relationships? Because if they don't then it's a supremacy movement

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          >does this kind of feminist have a problem with tops and bottoms in gay relationships?
          I think radical feminists around the 1970s-1980s sperged about this actually

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >"Sex dolls + robots embody the messages, the ideology, of porn - that women are objects for men's sexual use. They replicate the same power dynamics between men and women expressed in pornography
        And they completely - COMPLETELY emancipate women from this dynamic

        i am torn on this issue.

        >for
        ANY tool against the gynocracy is inherently valuable. this is a threat to women everywhere, a big "frick you" in the sky that gets a little more visible every day. now we can talk to a perfect woman online, or even imperfect if we want. why should we put up with your 30 bodies and 2 kids now?

        it's going to be a while before it's optimized, and i refuse to trust it until there's a locally hosted FOSS option (not a fossgay just dont want corpo wife advertising to me), but it will be there soon.

        >against
        every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population or increase his standing in life. pussy is, always has been, and always will be the strongest motivator a man has to improve himself. for a small amount of men, it doesn't matter, they will never get pussy in enough quantity to have kids that will benefit the state. that's simply not the target demographic. this is targeting all men, a wide net, and one that (if popularized and developed) will catch an unacceptable number of viable men bevause they don't want to put up with woman bullshit. it also sends women into an apoplectic rage as they no longer can count on men and simps for gibs, nor attention, nor leverage. ai girlfriends combined with sexbots or even separately from sexbots crashes the pussy market with no survivors. this is unacceptable to women and the state, for good reason, because this is death cult levels of checking out of society and you're a fool to think it's going to stop with sub-5 males.

        so yeah, it's great short term for men but middling long term and immediately catastrophic for women and any country exposed to it.

        what do i think should happen? i think this tech should be developed to a viable state, disseminated as FOSS firmware/software, refined, and put on the shelf. it's the nuclear option to rein women in. legit incels can use it.

        >every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population
        This is limited by reproducing women, not reproducing men
        Countless virgins could not do the work of one Chad

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Women are fricking demons. they literally want incels to have no solace at all

    • 8 months ago
      robowaifutechnician

      feminism is a cartel like opec

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Women don't win wars or do dangerous jobs. They are also a tax net negative. If men completely pulled out of those areas of society women would be doing DISGUSTING shit to bring men back so they can live on easy mode again.

    Only a tiny fraction of men have dropped out and they're already panicking and making onlyfans accounts.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >men kill themselves and eachother so fast it is a net positive on societal income
      >women live longer and contribute in non-monetary ways
      ok

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Amazing bait, I forgot women build and fix roads, clean sewers, maintain electricity, water, drive trucks, build houses

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          and men die earlier because of it. thanks

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            cuckolds do this. simps and betabux. i this is i always encourage men not to support a capitalist system that exploits them and doesnt care for their needs

  8. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    If this actually happens I think murder and rape rates will increase just sayin

  9. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fake journalism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Remove all the media and suddenly moronic boomers and feminists would have no more outlet to vomit their shitty opinions disguised as truth.

  10. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Encourage sex bots and robots.
    Terminate ALLLLL onlyfans payments and simping.
    Let the incels have their stupid chatbots and AI generated porn you dumb bawds hahahahahahh no more money for you for spreading your butthole you will actually have to sell sex services to men like me who will smell it and lick it and penetrate it.

  11. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can I host my own offline yet?
    I want to integrate her into home Assistant

  12. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >N-Noooooo you're supposed to be lonely and miserable! Your entire purpose is to wageslave so shitty people like me can continue living easy lives!

    They really do hate us for just existing, don't they? I once had a prostitute b***h at me simply because I glanced at her and smiled.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Society is a ponzi scheme designed to keep most men unhappy so they keep wage slaving and conforming in the hopes that they'll get the American dream life of house, wife, kids and land. But in reality you're told...
      >If you work hard, save your money, buy a house and keep at Tinder for years, you may just bag yourself an overweight single mother in her 30s who will resent you for not being the man she thinks she deserves
      It makes sense why men don't want this shitty deal so keep playing videogames and want to frick sex robots or talk to AI gfs which are far more bearable and pleasant that 90% of modern US roasties. Ai gf's are a threat to them. Losing their narcissistic supply of "beta-orbiters", (who they can easily manipulate) is deeply haunting them. Their power is waning, take away male-thirst and women become absolutely powerless. Which is why the femoid screams out in pain as this anon shows

  13. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    i eagerly await the day where i can spend my weekends shagging my ai wife in vr and then having continuity with my phone to talk with her there at work

  14. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anon for president 2024.
    My platform:
    - First incel president
    - No pussy no work
    - Free sexbots
    - Subsidize AI gfs
    - State mandated girlfriends for simps
    - Make the USPS offer banking services
    - Ban women in the workforce
    - Ban youtube video ads
    - State subsidized Tentacle rape hentai
    - UBI for all NEETs
    - Invade romania to free andrew tate
    - Ban Tattoos and piercings except very small ear piercings
    - Limit how much food women are allowed to eat per day. Men can eat as much as they want

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      lololol
      "Incels of the World, Rise Up! You have Nothing to Lose but your Virginity!"

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Also an anon, to add
      - Free drugs which are all legal
      - Gigabit wifi now blankets nation, pushing 5g into the ocean
      - Women are excluded from UBI so that they have to wageslave for their state mandated bfs

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >- Gigabit wifi now blankets nation, pushing 5g into the ocean
        based

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      You jest but you can run for office if you're 35 you know

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Invade romania to free andrew tate
      You don't know who you're fricking with, anon. Go ahead, invade as much as you like. You won't find any resistance, but as your soldiers drift into sleep, their humvees without wheel and with all petrol siphoned. Their guns will be missing buffer tubes and muzzle devices.
      Technical equipment? Gone. Fighter jets? Already chopped up and sold as scrap. Clothes? Already work by a thief on his way to swindle Germans by impersonating Americans.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        The true might of Romania

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Overall a better platform than Robert Kennedy Jr's

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Ban women in the workforce

      Where do I sign?!?!?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Kind of cringe but you have secured my vote anon.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      You almost got me. Just one more thing and you'd be perfect: what would you do to gays? This is a deal maker or breaker.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        I am bisexual myself so I will be keeping us around, guess you just won't vote for me then Anon.

  15. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's of course not really a threat to female independence. But it will make society more atomized. It could be argued that some currents within feminism helped start this, while others of course did not and merely sought to abolish gender differences.

  16. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    So which stage are they on now?

    Remember this roastie, The "Moore's Law" of AI has an interval of every MONTH rather than every two years. AI girlfriends and robots are about to become a lot more lifelike.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >a lot more lifelike
      so they're going to become b***hy c**ts in a few months? great, technology always ruins itself

      >Invade romania to free andrew tate
      You don't know who you're fricking with, anon. Go ahead, invade as much as you like. You won't find any resistance, but as your soldiers drift into sleep, their humvees without wheel and with all petrol siphoned. Their guns will be missing buffer tubes and muzzle devices.
      Technical equipment? Gone. Fighter jets? Already chopped up and sold as scrap. Clothes? Already work by a thief on his way to swindle Germans by impersonating Americans.

      kek

  17. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think most women don't actually care about that. But you want to imagine they do.

    t. I talk to women.

    • 8 months ago
      Robowaifutechnician

      Just make chadbots there you go
      Fairnsquare

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      most women dont care about anything thats not in their immediate line of sight or on instagram

  18. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    If they were like Joi from blade runner I'd consider it. But what we have now is pathetic, so real women it is.

  19. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ok Black folk
    There is the fact that If we actually have robots you totally would watch human female as object, because you wouldnt noticed it, you would be totally in-difference towards them.
    What are the possible consequences?
    >Would you just want sex with them? Is there a posible affection stimule that you could develop toward this object?
    >Would you lose human respect from woman? Because there would not be reciprocal recognition man-woman.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Would you just want sex with them?
      no. i will stick with my ai gf exclusively out of spite
      i hate roasties

      >Would you lose human respect from woman?
      what do you mean? how is "human respect" different from regular respect?

      i dont respect females now already. the only people who respect women are reddit cuckolds. its the people on the extreme end; the black pilled incels and the giga-chads who run through them, that see women for what they really are

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I love hearing feminist reasoning "if you no longer sexually desire us than you won't respect us" it's so funny.

      Btw I already don't respect you, not because you are a woman, but because you are a b***h.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I am willing to admit I am a submissive guy. Women HATE submissive men and would never give them the time of day. Frick sake, they hate dominant men and only want the absolute top of the top, everyone else is beneath their notice. If women were never going to talk to me in the first place, they lose nothing, I get a tall, strong robot gf that will protect me and care for me. What is the issue?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Brother, I couldn't have said that better myself

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >What is the issue?
        Your extreme porn addiction is a threat to feminism.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Wanting to dominate women is a threat to feminism
          >Liking weak short women you can manhandle is a threat to feminism

          >Wanting to be dominated by women is a threat to feminism
          >Liking strong tall women who can ma'amhandle you is a threat to feminism

          Doesn't seem like feminism is something worthy of consideration

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            It would be if you weren't as pornsick as you are that it leaks into your critical thinking.

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              Just cause you rub yourself every day and night doesn't mean everyone else does too. Some of us have, you know, partners.

              Then again, I guess that explains your inability to comprehend the greentext

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Please, tell me more about how I am a threat to women who see me as nothing more then a worm or dirt and have never once interacted with me. I am a literal ghost as far as anyone is concerned. Would you rather me go to /misc/ and become radicalized? Or stay in my room getting bullied by a robot?

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's a bait man don't get so riled up.
            Besides only a shut-in moron would consider someone who is merely submissive as extremely porn addicted

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            You're literally just making shit up now scrote. Persecution complex of yours.

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              rather than... otherwise something off with your mentally ill ass....

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                rather that

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              You are persecuting us by trying to ban ai gfs. You don't want us to be happy. You want us to suffer

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Preventing you from oppressing women is not persecution.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >fricking an artifical gf oppresses real women
                Damn, you are delusional beyond repair

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Literally just read feminist theory on the subject. See

                https://i.imgur.com/SlxxPDJ.png

                Book about the threat of sexbots to feminism.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not reading some random book
                Gib the tldr or frick off and stop oppressing us

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Just because you're illiterate doesn't mean the arguments therein are illegitimate.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Tell me the arguments then. You're the one who brought them up.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                See

                It's funny listening to feminists about how they don't need men and that sex toys are much better anyways, and when sexbots are on the horizon they act like this. Seems like they can't live without that gratifying male attention.

                Aren't they the ones who always b***h about gender roles and patriarchy. Widespread sexbots would remove the need for men to compete in the male hierarchy that "patriarchy puts upon them" so we'd see much less men toiling away at grueling jobs and having 80 hour workweeks.
                "Emancipation for me but not for you", I guess

                Do feminist wanna "free" themself from men and haven't they done a lot of it already. This is merely men "freeing" themselves from women. Finally standing up for themselves like brave feminists did before, no?

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                How are ai gfs oppressing women?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Would you lose human respect from woman?

      What respect?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Would you lose respect
      my homie i dont respect women right now KEK

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Women already don't regard the vast majority of men as human so I don't see how men not seeing women as human should be a problem.

  20. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    These issues are basically religious meta you can really get them wrong and betray yourself
    you are being exploited.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      even the bambi sleeps thing was basically this sort of meta where they become a doll crying for help, people are really foolish and the troony thing and everything, they failed life

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        and i've seen /misc/ talking about bambi sleeps
        i've seen other political commentators talk about sissy hypno
        like wtf? this whole thing is weird
        matrixis troony now
        elon musk troony kid
        you're in a hell and it's racist and cucked too
        and even just that troony racist cucked is fricked up
        this placeis openly gay though but it's cucked, so it hates homosexuals too
        it'sinsane as well
        it is a satanic hell
        it can't even enjoy women
        it is a totally fallen thing their world

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          the power of the dark side is endless and godlike
          people are just freaks
          they're being betrayed to psychopathic criminals and things of that nature as well
          their lives are ruined and it's playing with them forever, using them for power, pure evil devils
          literally corrupt
          drug addict, moronic, abused, failures, homosexuals, nazis and so on, every evil in them
          and I realized once they lose too much innocence that's all she wrote
          may as well be dead and many do

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            just wow, that's all there is to do at a certain point
            you are the devil

  21. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, women just now get the same independence men do. Want to be equal to men? Cool, let's do it, a thousand better options for men will force women to be better than those options, same thing women have with men.

  22. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Look.
    Basically, I'm just not going to stop building the robot wife.
    I know... UGH I know.... I'm sorry!!!!!!
    It's just that I'm not going to stop building is all
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      BASED
      That is why I also want to become an AI engineer

  23. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    headline is dumb. anyone thinking women wouldnt also be buying these is insane

    im a fembot neet and would be willing to wageslave for a sexbot husbando

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      it was shown in an article that women can't cope with AI the same way men can.

  24. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's funny listening to feminists about how they don't need men and that sex toys are much better anyways, and when sexbots are on the horizon they act like this. Seems like they can't live without that gratifying male attention.

    Aren't they the ones who always b***h about gender roles and patriarchy. Widespread sexbots would remove the need for men to compete in the male hierarchy that "patriarchy puts upon them" so we'd see much less men toiling away at grueling jobs and having 80 hour workweeks.
    "Emancipation for me but not for you", I guess

  25. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    information is death
    do not play with it

  26. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    How are sexbots a threat to female independence?

  27. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would the Powers That Be care? That's just another addiction industry that would stimulate the economy. You get lonely people offer them a high end solution that preys on their insecurities, probably a subscription service too. Trick them into stimulating the economy just so they can simulate normalcy. Just like trannies, hint, hint.

    Sex dolls are just gonna make incels that much more of a problem, hopefully a problem people can't ignore either. I'd love to see Sex Dolls and AI to get the same social treatment as Onlyfans/Simping. Adopted by fringe weirdos who make/spend big bucks, and hated by everyone else with a brain.

    The problems are only gonna get worse before they get better, might as well accelerate into the dumpster fire.

  28. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I support anything that keeps autists away from human beings.

  29. 8 months ago
    Christ

    >if males who prefer sex bots are inadequate, then inadequate males will organically drive themselves extinct by using them and thusly remove losers from the dating market and the gene pool
    >if males who prefer sex bots ARE adequate, then women are just losing fair and square... to shapely lumps of plastic
    It HAS to be one of these options. No possibilities exist between or outside of them.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >It HAS to be one of these options. No possibilities exist between or outside of them.

      Untrue, you can also be tax cattle

  30. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI girlfriends won't come soon enough to save me, I don't really see myself suffering through decades alone waiting for the technology to improve to the point of coming close to satisfying the desire for companionship and romantic connection. It's a nice dream, though.

  31. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sex doll nakadashi

  32. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    So they want independence but they also don't want independence

  33. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >female independence is dependent on males wanting them
    ???????????????????????????????

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are you beginning to understand, anon?

  34. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Notice how when confronted with actual reasonable arguments the feminist goes silent

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      It sucks, I saw it happen several times in this thread and, like, you want to know their response to some comment considering how it deconstructs or addresses what they've been saying here but you'll just never know. Would be surprised if they ignore in their head for themselves as well

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      It sucks, I saw it happen several times in this thread and, like, you want to know their response to some comment considering how it deconstructs or addresses what they've been saying here but you'll just never know. Would be surprised if they ignore in their head for themselves as well

      What you see as a reasonable argument is actually so self-defeating it's not even worth responding to. Everyone knows you're wrong already, why respond?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >appeal to masses
        Then please enlighten us. How are we wrong?

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          You destroyed them with a single question. Noticed they use the neonazi "fall silent" technique when you called them out lmao

  35. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Very few things in life make me happier than watching women lose their shit over this. The best part? There is, quite literally, nothing they can do to stop it. Nothing.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      They will find a way to ban them. They always do

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        It won't work. I understand your where you're coming from, but they'll never be able to pull it off. They're helpless and that's why they're lashing out.

        The funniest thing is that sexbots will probably be expensive, so not every guy will be able to afford them. But still the thought of a fraction of the male population witholding their attention from them sends them into a fit of rage and desperation.

        Now they are, but like everything else they'll eventually be affordable to everyone. It was only, what, 10-15 years ago that a 55" LED TV was like 2K? Now they're at Walmart for 250 bucks

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        So what? Guns, drugs, booze, ilicit goods are banned in 99% of the world yet for some "strange" reason they are still a billion dollar/euro business
        Same with politicians who claim they ban said stuff and being found out with them not long after

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          You need lots more resources for sex bots than for that other stuff.

        • 8 months ago
          robotwaifutechnician

          Its actually in my best interest that they wiener block this as much as possible lol

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      The funniest thing is that sexbots will probably be expensive, so not every guy will be able to afford them. But still the thought of a fraction of the male population witholding their attention from them sends them into a fit of rage and desperation.

  36. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Women are stupid. They go on and on about how much they hate men and how independent they are, but pull this shit when there's an actual chance for a true gender divide.

    Classic female manipulation.

  37. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    The problem women are starting to encounter is they miscalculated their ability to play the long game, something men generally thrive at. They don't understand (or maybe they're just starting to) that most men would be content as hell to live a simple life in a modest dwelling and do some combo of work, exercise, game, and engage in some sort of creative enterprise. The sole thing men may have struggled with is a lack of pussy, but now with sex bots in the mix it's over.

    Show me a guy living a simple life in affordable housing with enough money to live, games to play, and a sex bot to plow, and I'll show you a guy who doesn't care what women say or do

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Show me a guy
      homie i'm gonna be that guy, you don't need to show anything

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        This guy fricks! Also, frick this site for making me type extra words because I'm not being "original." Total jannie genocide (and yes, I know it's a bot, but still)

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Even less. The sexbot having the ability to move around a bit is just a net-positive. I bought one of those as an alternative to the real thing and got surprised by how much she's enough to satisfy my sexual needs.
      But it's funny to see how women are now getting mad at me when they didn't give a flying frick about my existence before.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        is the one in pic the one you got? can you tell me more? how do you like it?

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          >is the one in pic the one you got?
          No that's the next I plan to get. I have a younger one that shouldn't be posted but now I want one with bigger assets.

          >how do you like it?
          I was skeptical at first, but let me tell you. Being able to grab some hips while you do it changes e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. To no surprises I've also be significantly less horny since I got one.

          >is it worth it?
          Preemptively replying to this: It depends.
          If you ever plan to have a real relationship one day then no, I wouldn't recommend it.
          Otherwise a big yes, it just doesn't compare with your hand. That being said I'm going to be real and say that a [quality] sexdoll is going to cost you not as much as a real girlfriend, but still a fair amount because of maintenance. Some goes up to 3k and that's upfront, not counting all maintenance tools and products. And obviously you should own your own place before considering one. Right now, as proven in this thread, it'd be preferable to not let people know. Though you shouldn't care about that in the long run.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I have a younger one that shouldnt be posted

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dude I live that life right now but with a Fleshlight / occational escort to satisfy the pussy craving.
      Women aren't shit.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Same, but with a vibrating silicon tube and tingling, warming lube.

  38. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think you're misreading the title a little, OP. It's not saying that sex robots are a threat to female independence. It's saying that sex robots are offering men a solution to the way female independence (supposedly) threatens us.
    They're not even trying to construct a victim narrative anymore. They're openly admitting that they just want to control men and destroy things that make us happy (just because it doesn't involve them.)

  39. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Anything that predominantly benefits men is anti-women.
    >Someone's grandad killed fiddy Japs for this.

  40. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think women in my generation have sucked so many Black folk off that it lowered their IQ

  41. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    How is men finding alternatives to female companionship in a hypergamic gynocracy where the top 5% of them get to have any unpaid sex with women a threat to their independance?
    Isn't this exactly what women want?
    For non-Chad's to leave women alone?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      They want the men they don't find attractive to not just vanish from their sight but to be suffering in silence, otherwise what is the strength/impact/value of a woman's rejection? They want the impact of their primary tool to be high, that is for rejection to induce unsolvable suffering in those who are rejected. The strength of a woman is the impact her rejection has on a rejected person.

      A man has brawn and brains, a woman has sexual access/rejection.

  42. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    i am torn on this issue.

    >for
    ANY tool against the gynocracy is inherently valuable. this is a threat to women everywhere, a big "frick you" in the sky that gets a little more visible every day. now we can talk to a perfect woman online, or even imperfect if we want. why should we put up with your 30 bodies and 2 kids now?

    it's going to be a while before it's optimized, and i refuse to trust it until there's a locally hosted FOSS option (not a fossgay just dont want corpo wife advertising to me), but it will be there soon.

    >against
    every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population or increase his standing in life. pussy is, always has been, and always will be the strongest motivator a man has to improve himself. for a small amount of men, it doesn't matter, they will never get pussy in enough quantity to have kids that will benefit the state. that's simply not the target demographic. this is targeting all men, a wide net, and one that (if popularized and developed) will catch an unacceptable number of viable men bevause they don't want to put up with woman bullshit. it also sends women into an apoplectic rage as they no longer can count on men and simps for gibs, nor attention, nor leverage. ai girlfriends combined with sexbots or even separately from sexbots crashes the pussy market with no survivors. this is unacceptable to women and the state, for good reason, because this is death cult levels of checking out of society and you're a fool to think it's going to stop with sub-5 males.

    so yeah, it's great short term for men but middling long term and immediately catastrophic for women and any country exposed to it.

    what do i think should happen? i think this tech should be developed to a viable state, disseminated as FOSS firmware/software, refined, and put on the shelf. it's the nuclear option to rein women in. legit incels can use it.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >every man who gets hooked on this is one less man who is looking to grow your country's population or increase his standing in life.
      There a lot of wrongs in that statement.

      1. First off, BOT seems to think that you need all men to reproduce. That's completely false. The problem that people don't like is how "rich" people right now are not reproducing that much. In the meantime in the ghettos or shit countries like India we have women having up to 12 children per family. Except for Japan, which actually is a huge misinformation but that's another topic, the human population is still globally going up.
      2. The men who want to increase their standing in life will do it regardless of if they get pussy or not. That is not their main drive. They also naturally get pussy anyway because they look for success and money, which will always attract women.
      3. Men opting out for sexbots is not going to change anything for the pussy market, they were already out of it to begin with. Besides, "Chad Thunderwiener" over there is going to directly benefit from all the competition withdrawing. You think women will care about having to share the top? They're already doing it. And there will always be that part of the population full of simps that will rush to make them feel better about themselves.
      >"You're right girl, I can't believe those losers would go for a sexbot. But I'm different."

      The truth here is that people interested in sexbots weren't in the dating market. They were already out. The only "problem" is that now they're happy with an alternative, and we can't have that because ---

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Because
        The problem is actually more about social economics. Women need a class of men who are 'untouchable' in order to function. If the bottom 80% of men can get their fulfillment from AI, then who are they rejecting? If they aren't rejecting men, they are constantly accepting men, constantly accepting is low value. They need men to shit on because it's the pillar of hypergamy

        People don't realize how profound this truth is and the immense impact it's going to have on society. If a sizeable population of men would just drop off from the dating pool, what do you think is going to happen to the rest of men? Hypergamy is part of female nature and is not going away. Less men doesn't mean more women for you, less men means the group of men that still is in the dating market will be again divided by the 80-20 rule. High-tier normies will become incels, chadlites will become normies. It just means an increased competition among the surviving men. Women will compete even more fiercely for the remaining top of the group, which means they will reject the bottom part of that survivor group, no matter how attractive they are now. Attraction IS relative, the proof for that will soon hit society like a high-speed train

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          >even fewer men are reproducing
          >normies dont get any pussy
          >they opt for ai gfs
          >even fewer men are reproducing...
          there will no longer be enough chads to date/frick and the whole thing implodes. thats kinda the point. and yes, you do need men reproducing or at least having the promise of it. your premise than men desire success just for the sake of material possession is false. when you remove pussy and the prospect of family, all that's left is material, and that is simply not a good enough motivator for enough men. i personally don't want to go to the trouble of working if i never have a shot at a family, it means nothing, my life is worthless becauss my bloodline ends with me. why should i give a frick about anything? and if that mentality spreads, which it will as men check out and women become endgame tier picky, it means population collapse and a recalibration.

          OR

          we make ai gfs really really good right fricking now and make sure women know that the alternative is better than them. lower your standards or even chad will check out because robot pussy is better than any human pussy, and you're lucky to get any dick at all. that's the solution. make sure the top tier checks out first. by keeping sex robots expensive you ensure that.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          And this is a problem because..? If women become more exclusive and fierce, that's their own problem. I don't understand how you still manage to turn this whole situation around to basically just say "it's those men's fault for going to sexbots, that will frick up society". Who cares? Society has clearly made a statement that they don't care about them either.
          Men are opting out precisely because society helps women to frick them over. Even exluding the bottom men going for sexbots, there's a huge reason why yo-password-bros became a huge meme. The problem is that society, and you without even realizing it, will invent all kind of narrative just to fricking, blame, men. All the fricking time.

          Just look at this. They're not even allowed to frick a piece of plastic in their own place. And yet you somehow think that "they should work for the best of society".

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Point went flying you by isnt?
            The point of that point wasnt to claim "is men fault" bullshit
            Is about how this train crash of society will hit the wall since they went off the woman prostitute nature breaks and it will hit hard

            Segment up there was written by some /misc/ wannabe woman breaking her nature for just one second to see the other side, kinda spot on isnt?

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Is about how this train crash of society
              This is a stupid point. I already explained why, which is why I ignored that argument and talked about the rest of your post.
              That crash argument is just as stupid as the people thinking that women will regret this/pay for this/ or that idiots talking about the incels rising up. The only thing sexbots will do is give women another excuse to get angry at, but that will certainly not change how they behave or how society works. For one guy picking a sexbot you will still have 9 others still simping for onlyfans, because sexbots will be viewed as another "gross thing for gross people".

              Sexdolls have existed for years now. A good amount of men are buying them, it still didn't change jackshit on the dating market. The only difference is that it gave ghost men an alternative to not get sexually frustrated. The same shit will happen with sexbots.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can not compare sex dolls to robowaifus. Take it from someone who is obsessed with robowaifus becoming a reality. Sex dolls are disgusting because you might as well have sex with a corpse. Robowaifus will stimulate every positive part of sensual relationships. Now I personally do not think this will make women obsolete or something but robowaifus will be an exceptional avenue for men so much that dating might not even cross many mens heads anymore.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Sex dolls are disgusting because you might as well have sex with a corpse.
                The frick? How did you even reach that conclusion?
                So obviously you also argue that women using dildos is gross because it's like having sex with a cut-off dick right?

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                It is just my personal opinion. For some reason I do not view onaholes and dildos gross like I view sex dolls. Now if they had AI functions it would be a different matter.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I can't speak for anybody other than myself, but I am already motivated to make money to build myself a rig for local AI generation. You can fricking bet I'd be motivated as frick for hardcore wageslaving if there was a sexbot on sale. From the perspective of corpo-israelites, if you want to continue infinite growth, sexbot tech advancement will be a good avenue for you. It is a niche waiting to be milked, the consequences of the choices of women mean the niche will keep growing. I'd even go further and say if the current corporations will not be willing to step into that niche, someone else will and they will have a new competitor. Even worse, a competitor that wont allow to be wiener-blocked by the screeching of women like they are.

  43. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >be me troony
    >entire life just need to be more womanly
    > this year started a garden, working on self in therapy, working on becoming independent and next goal is probably get BOT and maybe find a guy to make into a happy loving partner
    >2 years before that I grieved losing my husband
    >year before that taught myself how to cook
    >year before that lost 120 lbs
    >year before that figured out all my medical issues and why i gained weight
    >year before that ended hardcore drinking habit
    >year before that grieved losing my best friend

    >meanwhile women
    >"can you just be nice and loving?"
    >"NO FRICK YOU!!!!!!!!!! ITS TOO HARD!!!!!! BUY ME THINGS!!!!! SLAVE!!!!"
    >"WE MUST STOP THE ADVANCEMENT OF ALL TECHNOLOGY LEST THE MOIDS REALIZE OUR USELESSNESS"
    >"NOOOOOO YOU CANT BUY A BIRTHING POD AND HAVE A troony AND A ROBOT TO GO ROUND THE OUTSIDE!!!!! WHERE IS YOUR MANAGER?!!!?!?!?!"

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >be me tran-
      Stopped reading there

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        your post needs to be original poy

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm glad you've got your life more in order. That's nice to hear anon, what do you garden?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      You're a pick-me, so you've just lost your woman card.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's because you're a man, moron.
      Women are women

  44. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >wants women to be independent from men
    >feminist policies implemented to insure women can be financially secure without a man
    >many men become obsolete for women because women only want men who earn more than them
    >many men become lonely due to inherent female vanity while rich Chad and frickboy Chad has harems of independent wymyn
    >these men get fake dolls as a futile attempt to cope
    >feminists get mad that lonely men are trying to not be lonely because in their twisted minds, if men are not grovelling at every woman's feet it's "le patriarchy"

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      women do and say everything to make the average guy obsolete, like they have zero problem most men have social issues. the hell is this shit

  45. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    We can ban the ai sex robots if we criminalize abortion, abolish federal income tax for mothers, end no fault divorce, and throw everyone who works for Match into prison for life.

  46. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    They know it will take the power of pussy away from them and feel threatened.
    Once we can access pussy the way we like, we would no longer need to even interact with this awful, miserable creature that holds pussy hostage just to make us dance for them for the tiniest chance to get it.

  47. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    If it will ever happen and become very popular among man, then the same happens for woman. There would be robochads ready to frick the shit out of them. And we will have the world where we frick with robots. The next step is to create an artificial wombs to keep the population at some minimal level.

  48. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    it was when i was about 14-15 years old, i blackpilled myself just by pure logic and observation. i only found out that other people held similar views as me on the internet years later
    i was raised in a family mostly comprised of females, trust me when i way women aren't as good as they seem

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      wrong thread shit

  49. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sex bots are threatening female independence as much as dildos and vibrators are threatening male independence.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *