>WAAAAH! AI WILL REPLACE MEEE!
No. You will be replaced by people who learned to use AI.
90% of the jobs were automated in the last century. 90% of the workers didn't become jobless. They just do something else with the new tools.
Automation doesn't replace workers. Automation makes workers more efficient.
>You will be replaced by people who learned to use AI.
not just me, the whole department replaced by a single person and destined to eat bugs
yeah those 90% of workers moved to support and service positions.
AI can automate those too, however. we can all be AI artists i guess, but art is rapidly becoming worthless
it will replace my fellow transisters and I do not like it
This. I mean if companies using ai ti generate money by replacing people I do the same lol
Soon students will be taught how to train AI to create new ideas, concepts, designs, etc.
>students
Do you have a license for knowledge?
The only things that really replaces workers to the degree that they can't find any work are women and immigrants.
Tools just make you better.
the real question is why do these retards need to work to exist
I think everybody who works in tech gets that, only codelet naggers don't. chatgpt is nice if you're too lazy to go to stackoverflow to fix a problem or just too lazy to write simple code, but if you try to let it work on it's own it will at some point fuck up.
The best part is, that by working with that tech you are training it to do your job, better and better, with less and less of your input needed. But it will take at least 2 years to fully replace you.
look on the bright side
if you are a rich millennial, and companies automate themselves from needing any workers
you can buy zoomers and beyond as sex slaves for pennies on the dollar
the future is bright
>you can buy zoomers and beyond as sex slaves for pennies on the dollar
>the future is bright
This will be illegal and the Fed and their friends will be doing it anyway.
I said rich millennials, i.e. me
I don't even understand how the doomposters who claim that it's going to replace 80% of jobs expect this to work economically. What point is there in cutting costs with AI if your revenue is going to be near zero anyway, because no one will have money to buy your product, because they lost their jobs to AI?
The end point of monopoly is to win.
>Automation doesn't replace workers. Automation makes workers more efficient.
That's factually incorrect.
So, the plow machine made workers less efficient?
You are factually too retarded to add anything to the conversation.
>You, a creator of new and original content, will be replaced by people who learned how to use an algorithm that scrapes and steals pre-existing content to resell it as if it were new.
do AI shills really?