>artstation allowing ai "art"

>artstation allowing ai "art"
Enough is enough.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What's artstation?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's a keyword you put in your prompts to get better quality images, I think.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ay lmao, dis homie gets it

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >be artists
    >tape a banana to a wall
    >spray paint all over a canvas
    >shit in a fricking jar
    >dunk a crucifix in piss
    >this is art, that'll be 50 million + tip
    >cry when tech wizards dunk on you epic style

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >AI art
      >tweak in gimp
      >print out and do 33 day bukakki
      >mount it to wall using nothing but feces
      take that art gays.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        have a nice day homosexual freemason

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >ashkenazi israelites do dumb shit in some venue to devalue it
      >that means you now have to spread your ass and let in everything
      no.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't that ironically what israelites do? That's the israeli money laundering scheme. You shouldn't blame talented realism and oil paint artists for that. Look up CIA modern art relationship.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >everyone who doesn't think like me is heretic
          Are you sure you are genuine human being?
          Seems to me you are just cheap mass produced imitation with totalitarian and collectivistic tendencies.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >guy gives genuine pointer
          >moron responds with meme image and no argument

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            DA JOOS isn't an argument.
            It's an end point, it means you no longer want to discuss any ideas other your obsession about ~~*them*~~.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              yes it is.
              That's like living in Rome and saying "The Romans isn't an argument!"

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Well, anon, what other solution do you have for he ~~*ai*~~ problem, is it to kill all israelites?
                And you want me to argue what, don't kill all israelites?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It wasn't a "genuine pointer', ms. poltard

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >yfw it actually is

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That pic is kanye west, but the man on the right is a israelite who said that he would medicate him to become a zombie.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Black folk should know their place

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >doesn't deny it

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, but this is not who are getting replaced. AI is replacing people who spend 10-20 years to learn how to draw and paint.

        I imagine shit like you described will sell even more in the future if AI takes hold. Imagine a performance - monkey walks on stage, turns his back to audience, pulls his pants and shits on stage. Woah. That is powerfull. Why? Because this is true human expression. A peak of human will and mind combined. So brave. Not like this souless AI thing. That must worth 50 mil atleast.

        Just because shit subversive degenerate art is pushed top down doesn't mean you need to abandon humanity.

        You guys are moronic, I don't understand how paying a human makes the difference between everything being taken over and soul being destroyed. You're seriously telling me people constantly homogenizing their work and simplifying it more and more to satisfy market demand was a worthwhile trade for the "commission grind"? People have been b***hing and moaning about commissions for years, if you wanted to be relevant and make money at all you make grand sacrifices. This has been true even back then, you seriously think the " masters" loved to paint the local royalty just to get maybe 3 days worth of fricking food? You spend years of your life learning how to walk, does that mean you need to be compensated for all that effort?
        You create for the sake of creating, art as a whole is unnecessary for survival, so why the frick does it need to be sold as a commodity that everyone needs? People used to need to make clothing by hand too, but do you seriously think pants made in a factory is more worthwhile solely because it has one BRAND over another? Functionally its all the same, and humans always have the ability to create, nobody lost the skill or knowledge. Grandma made a blanket for her grandchildren featuring the things they like not only because she wanted to, but because its a human expression of her love thats relevant to her and her life. You guys want AI to be the only art that you see, thats your own fault and your own prerogative. That doesnt absolve your laziness to not be the change you want to see. It's too bad you won't make $10 for your work so I guess learning and knowledge is just a waste of time to see the things you want to see. Keep b***hing about how you don't get what you want, entitled homosexuals.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't that ironically what israelites do? That's the israeli money laundering scheme. You shouldn't blame talented realism and oil paint artists for that. Look up CIA modern art relationship.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Why do israelites need money laundering schemes? The US pays them billions every year just because. You /misc/tards make no sense.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If you donate money to 'charity' you write it off as tax exempt. If you put a piece of art up on a 'charity' auction but you own the 'nonprofit charity' then you can avoid taxation.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >be rich
      >choose some random guy as Artist
      >have your art friends put him in art galleries
      >have your art critic friend say he's really good
      >need to launder 40M
      >have guy paint three dots on a canvas
      >critic says its worth 40M
      >buy it for 40M
      >you now have assets worth 40M
      >A: sell it for 40M
      >you now have clean and legal 40M
      >B: donate it to some charity ball (extra points if its from your foundation so the money goes back to you)
      >you've now donated 40M to charity so you dont have to pay taxes
      >C: have it stolen
      >cash in 40M in insurance
      >D: put it up as collateral for an 30M loan
      >literally free hot-off-the-printer money magicked out of thin air and you can sell the painting to repay the loan
      You're a massive fricking moron so this might be the first time you've thought about this, but most expensive things arent actually worth what it says on the label, they're marked up several hundred thousand to several millions for legal, tax and clout reasons.
      All modern art in an art gallery is part of some stage of the laundering scheme above.
      All modern art not in an art gallery is done by people that like both Dali and drugs in equal measure.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        informative post

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I've never understood how this works. Why doesn't the question just become "how did you get the 40m in the first place?"

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Because art gallery don't do any checking, and lawmaker don't want to close their little loophole.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          you do it for someone else. There's a designated "clean guy" whose income is squeaky clean. Person X pays them with dirty money, buy the art piece, 10% or so goes to the artist and the rest goes back to Person X, usually through shell companies and "donations."
          >Wow, [artist] is so wild, they spent a million dollars just partying last year.
          >They sure buy expensive paint, that's 1000x the normal cost of paint. They're so prolific!

          Also the people who make the rules are the ones who do this, so the only ones that get caught are the ones that piss off their policy maker friends.
          This is why they're so mad at NFTs: finally the common man can money launder too! It's eating into their profit margins.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's not how it works, if you buy something for 40m the tax man will say "excuse me good xir, where did you get forty million dollars to begin with". But yes, the charity, insurance, """theft""" and loan collateral scams work as advertised.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >the tax man will say
          Absolutely nothing, unless you're not a part of the "club", and even then there's an easy workaround.
          Not that it matters much, since most high value purchases are done anonymously. Once the "art" is in your hands nobody asks where or how you got the money. All that matters is that the "art" is now officially valued at 40m, so it's open for all the other "scams" at that valuation.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      these aren't the same kinds of artists you're thinking.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Artstation is full of photobashers calling themselves concept artists. Most of them are the kind of thieves that they're accusing AI of being except they LITERALLY copy and paste photos and other artwork

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, but this is not who are getting replaced. AI is replacing people who spend 10-20 years to learn how to draw and paint.

      I imagine shit like you described will sell even more in the future if AI takes hold. Imagine a performance - monkey walks on stage, turns his back to audience, pulls his pants and shits on stage. Woah. That is powerfull. Why? Because this is true human expression. A peak of human will and mind combined. So brave. Not like this souless AI thing. That must worth 50 mil atleast.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >lowwit
        >pretty pictures look nice, I like AI art
        >midwit
        >AI ART IS THEFT ITS ABOUT THE MESSAGE AI HAS NO SOUL WHAT MATTERS IS THE MEANING AND EFFORT BEHIND IT
        >highwit
        >AI art understands aesthetic objective beauty and mathematical perfection far greater than humans are able to now, and has become superior to human art

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >>AI art understands aesthetic objective beauty and mathematical perfection far greater than humans are able to now, and has become superior to human art
          Not yet and you still need photoshop.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This lol I'm enjoying their autistic meltdown over some dude in his basement generating nice pics by typing words into his gpu

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >trust fund kiddies/money launderers
      >drawgays trying to make money through their work

      There is a massive difference here.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm a "real" artist
        pyw

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Be moron and doesnt know what artstation is
      >Think you are making a gotcha about what shit goes in a museum
      deroof self

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You will sing in a different tone when programmers will be redundant:^)

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        We want to be replaced

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You idiots keep retorting this as if it was 1998, we've known that for years, half the board fear ai will result in human extinction, half the board wants to accelerate it until we reach "singularity."

        Like talking to 5 years olds, I swear.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >singularity will reverse wealth concentration because...
          >because it just will, okay?
          UBI any day now, trust the plan

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            will reverse wealth concentration because...
            what?
            no one said that, those who want singularity want it for its own sake, not for a post-scarcity paradise
            but I guess an idiot parroting wojack speak wouldn't understand, they don't care if 99% or all of humans go extinct from ai as long they create their machine God
            there will come a time when both of you will start shooting each other in the streets

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        God,I hope so. Microsoft monkeys will be finally gone and we will have functional os.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Just because shit subversive degenerate art is pushed top down doesn't mean you need to abandon humanity.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        But it's the artists who are squealing because they might not be able to make money for the corps making degenerate shit.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        How is laughing at diggay industry cancer abandoning humanity.
        Go pick up a brush.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      So if an artist doesn't do any of those things you would be sympathetic?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm one of the "good" artist
        it's 100 years too late, the title became a joke long time before you were born

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >sympathetic
        Fee fees have nothing to do development and exploitation of ai, we're all going to be another road bumps, take solace in that you won't be alone.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    SAY NO!!!!!!!!

    IT'S NOT FAIR!!!!!!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      So it is ok if a human learns from hundreds of histories best artists and probably thousands of modern "artist" to be able to make sub par "art", but when AI does the same, and as it usual does it better, it is suddenly theft

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The same will happen to every knowledge job out there. All the years you spend in collage learning the subjects and then applying them in worse way, while forgetting most of the stuff and only sometimes applying actual critical thiking? Why be then surprised when AI does better then Lawyer, Codemonkey, Doctor, Manager, CEO, Scientist, Financer, Psychiatrist ...

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          nice fantasy but for the time being it only happened to furry porn drawers LMAO

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >He doesn't know
            Ignorance is a bliss as always

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            AI CEO:
            https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/tang-yu-an-ai-powered-robot-named-ceo-of-a-chinese-company-3326427
            AI bankers:
            https://www.theuxda.com/blog/banks-will-cut-millions-of-jobs-in-the-next-decade
            AI lawyers:
            https://donotpay.com/
            AI psychiatrists:
            https://www.apple.com/cz/search/mental-health?src=serp (many of them use AI chatbots, and ChatGPT can identify mental illnesses if you describe it)
            AI doctor:
            Not a single website, but people have been talking a lot about cardiologists being soon automated

            All of these are not 100% replacements and not even close to them, but they are big step into direction, just like how 2019 image blenders and thispersondoesnotexist.com were writing on the wall for 2D artists

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Feels good that the cum jar is a more significant artwork in the zeitgeist than any of these Twitter artists so desperately crave their works to achieve

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    REMINDER THAT ALL ANTI-AI POSTS ARE SHILLS
    AI ARE OUR FRIENDS

    DON'T LET THE SILICON VALLEY FRICKS CONVINCE YOU TO REGULATE AI
    AI SHOULD BE OPEN SOURCE

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What are some steps I can do to backup a non-pozzed version?

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Luddites seething.

    You will never defeat AI, no matter how much you try to get courts to side in favor of your rent-seeking bullshit the genie is out of the bottle.

    AI is the future and will only get better in the future. Nothing's been stolen from you, you're just mad because you thought you were special before meeting the harsh reality.

    Adapt or enjoy being replaced.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >You will never defeat AI
      eat shit, chips for brains

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Funny, that also works against digital artists.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Turn off power
        >Twitter artists can't use photoshop to make anal vore commissions anymore

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Do Americans really have power sockets without switches on them? So they have to physically remove the plug to turn off a device? How... special.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Devices have switches.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          you're really just looking for anything to nit pick, how is this a problem?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >type A/D power socket
        Where the hell is this at? An indian hotel?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, I just think they want to be paid. Can there be a fee they get for each image generated and royalties for books? I want to live in harmony with artists because they're based.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >they're based
        sounds to me like they're a bunch of unimaginative crybabies to me.
        there are great ways to capitalize on all of this that make their commissions faster, more predictable, more accurate, and reduce communication with unreliable clients about the details of their vision.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        so they're soulless greedy israelites that care more about money than art?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Do you think that historical artists worked for free at any point in time?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Even if that could be calculated the value would be like 0.0000000001 cents if calculated by the influence of their artwork on the output.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Do they pay a fee to the estate of Loomis per picture they make?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        art has no price, anon
        talent is a gift from god

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The court stuff won't fly unless they're prepared to have all inspiration be copyright infringement. I bet Disney would love to copyright the "Disney 3D Animation" style. When I was in art school 99% of the artist's characters were stylistically similar to 2D and 3D Disney characters.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >I bet Disney would love to copyright the "Disney 3D Animation" style
        Yikes, don't give them ideas.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      These people are just butthurt luddites who are unironically very uncreative because they are unable to see the potential in AI tools for assisting with the art creation process. Instead they see it as something replacing them, when they could instead be using it as a base to build off of.

      These anons get it
      Getting in the way of technological progress never pays
      And no amount of luddite seethe will change that

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    These people are just butthurt luddites who are unironically very uncreative because they are unable to see the potential in AI tools for assisting with the art creation process. Instead they see it as something replacing them, when they could instead be using it as a base to build off of.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they are butthurt for the wrong reasons.
      if there is anything to be butthurt over it is that AI will mess up our dopamine reward system.
      it will be pushing the boundaries of the reward system.
      just like electricity, cars and computers have fricked up our perception of speed, knowledge, power, effort and other concepts.

      this is the real problem with ai.

      i've tried generating code with prompts and frankly, its the coolest thing i've seen when it comes to computers since I started using them
      but as with all power, comes great responsibility. not only towards others but towards yourself as well.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    AI Art is fake, but cutting your dick off and living off experimental hormone drugs makes you a female.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      kek
      >AI isn't an art thief. It's an artist-identifying transmachine.
      >I'm not a prompt monkey. I'm an transartist, okay??
      When will this hatred and bigotry against transartists and artistic-identifying transmachines end??? I thought we were past this as a society

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The guys behind ArtStation have their hands in NFTs. They decided to profit off their own userbase. Very stupid, short-sighted business move.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >"art"roons seething their brains out on the inevitable
    Lmao my ass off
    You'll never be a real artist.
    You'll never be accepted.
    And most importantly, you'll never be a woman.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yawn

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        lmao so assblasted you had to write regex to have a machine help you keep the pain at bay

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          chatgpt wrote the regex for me, it was literally effortless. cope more tho

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            wow you can't even write a simple regex? it doesn't even do anything complicated

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              no effort > small effort

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                cringe

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        U mad, freak?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          cope more mutelet

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You're the one seething here, troon-kun

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              nah

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        u won't ever bee a woman

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >stealing anon's writing for your cursed satanic computer machine antics

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I really, really hate that you have to be either completely pro-AI art or Anti-AI art with absolutely no room for people with more complicated opinions on the subject.
    Once again, it just goes to show that the internet was a mistake.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I feel you friend, it's quite hard to have reasonable discussions on anything when people debate with emotions rather than facts.
      I don't think the Internet has anything to do with it though, you find this behaviour in every aspect of life.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There is no room for nuance when you are dealing with disingenuous homosexuals like this.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I really dont understand this stance at all. In that case all people are "stealing" art by looking at it. Learning to do art by viewing other art and trying to replicate it until you find your personal style is how humans have always been done, but somehow now that its a neural net its stealing. I would understand if they could point to examples where the AI isnt actually generating art its basically just matching prompts to a catalogue of existing images but that isnt what's happening.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          it's because the people who hate AI are luddites and will never understand how technology works

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Im not so sure its general AI hate and more just average artists being very concerned. I do sympathize with them to some degree. I have commissioned a few small things from artists on twitter and if i could just get an AI to make my d&d character art or profile pic then thats less work for them but the stealing aspect is just odd. If you paid for a huge volume of commissions from artists all over the world and then fed only those to the ML would that still be stealing? I assume most of these artists would still somehow say so

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I don't see there being any problem with gaining agency to do something yourself so that you don't need other people and can reduce your reliance on others, and also save money. Those are all benefits. Artists are not entitled to my money. It's no different from barbers getting upset if haircutting scissors and trimmers are sold to the masses and people cut their own hair.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Because guy getting sheme wrong.
            What is money laundering? Let's say there is Mister Drug trafficker (D) he has 1 million of dirty cash. And there is Mister Banker (B) who has 1 million and more of clean money on his accounts. They want to make exchange B pays D in legal money and D gives him 1 million of cash under the table. But it doesn't work like that. B can't just pay somebody 1 million , it would be money laundering charge. And he can't make bullshit purchase like 'hey D sell me pencil of 1 mil" it is laundering to.

            But with art you can make value out of air. D buys pictures by some Noname young artist for couple thousands. Bring ls picture to auction. Here B and his friends start rising stakes against each other until price rises to 1 mil and finally B buys picture from D for 1 million. Then D in exchange for laundering services gives B 1 million if dirty cash (plus fee for laundering) plus bag of cocaine. And here ideal money laundering happened. D gets 1 millions of absolutely legal money he can freely spend from his name: buy house, car etc. B gets 1 milion of dirty cash to send on whockers and bribes, and a bag of cocaine.

            And "Art" is magic that makes this trick happen. You can't inflate value of ordinary goods. But "Art" had no objective value it can be inflated by biyrs on auction to infinity. Ofc such dirty buys greatly contaminate art sphere as you can't tell difference where is real art purchase and where is laundering sheme.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Meant to

              I've never understood how this works. Why doesn't the question just become "how did you get the 40m in the first place?"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >don't pay a fricking subscription
        Why these dumb Black folk won't learn what are they against in first place before talking shit ?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >are you sure you don't take it?
        >maybe is fallen somewhere
        GOOD MORNING SIR!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I like how this example of art is just a superman OC. Do you think the artist would have drawn that if they'd never heard of superman or comics or is it possible that we all train on everything around us constantly?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's such a false equivalency I can't believe this was made in good faith

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Leftists are always opposed to new technology and the current culture war has them particularly riled up and fearful. If the internet had been around in the 60s leftists would have been unanimously opposed to the moon landing and crying on social media about how we should use that money to feed black families instead.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The choice has always been the same since ~2015, side with reddit trannies or chud pedos.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Pedos will never be accepted by the right wing no matter how much you shill and cope. We want to hang you. Even the Christians do. No matter how much the left kicks out those of you who aren't compliant or well connected enough, we still don't want you.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          t. reddit troony

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Age of consent is a feminist psyop, you dumb cattle.

            Fathers with shotguns will always be there. You will never be accepted. Rope yourselves now and get it over with.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              what if he's the father?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                what if I bite yer nuts off?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              single mothers with bills to pay will offer their kids, this is the culture you chose

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I chose nothing, and no they won't, they will report you to their local militia. Conservatives in no way choose the destruction of family units you delusional pedo scum.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >local militia
                that's fine, I don't live in Idaho

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                it's cool, they were fictional mothers too

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/CWc321s.jpg

                what if I bite yer nuts off?

                https://i.imgur.com/fvI5yek.jpg

                ay lmao, dis homie gets it

                show armpits of this cutie

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                you should commission an artist of the pits instead

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/CWc321s.jpg

                what if I bite yer nuts off?

                https://i.imgur.com/fvI5yek.jpg

                ay lmao, dis homie gets it

                prompt?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                check the /b/ thread
                BallerinaBrigade is the handle of the guy making them

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Age of consent is a feminist psyop, you dumb cattle.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's fine, I'm only raping imaginary children, nobody is getting hurt.
          Just like shooting pigs in gta.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I really, really hate that you have to be either completely pro-AI art or Anti-AI art with absolutely no room for people with more complicated opinions on the subject.
      Nobody really cares beside insecure artcels and AIchads dunking on them. But that's probably because I live in a place where people still use human labor to handpick cottons, kek.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The AI generated art has caused hilarious amounts of panic in the art community.
    I remember being told by so many places that AI is going to replace software engineering and computers will just be able to program themselves.
    I always knew that was bullshit, but I'm all for an AI that makes my work easier. I mean, all we fricking try and do all day is to make ourselves redundant by improving the code quality so it's easy to maintain and modify. We've got tools that can auto-generate code and AI assisted shit to try and improve our work. It's still not enough and we still need the human behind it to wade through the shit and fix all the broken shit.
    Now artgays are getting dunked on by computers and they're losing their fricking minds.
    I'm still employed.
    I hope someone manages to build one that will get rid of finance gays, accountant gays, management gays, lawgays and all those useless boomer jobs where they don't actually do anything, they just collect a paycheck.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A year or so ago this board was losing its mind because github scraped their code to build copilot and this was just theft how dare they i cant believe this fricking rust trannies.
    Crazy how this is not only different but also good.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      this board is filled with bots and shills of course they're going to encourage this
      always use the same talking points at the same time like fricking clockwork

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The difference is that copilot is proprietary, closed source, service as a software substitute. There is no proof to verify that they aren't copy pasting code.
      Contrast to stable diffusion where the models and the source code are all publically available and so we have empirical evidence that the way it learns is more like a human and it can't compress trillions of training set images into the 4GB model.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No one cares. Do you think people will go "Oh, i see, this is why I'm losing job and will not be able to pay my house and my wife left me, I see. Sorry I was mistaken before."

        People does not care about your arguments chud. Their survival is on the line, you can come up with how ever you want number of your dork arguments. No one cares.

        Not only you a dorks, you are actual morons also. Because you are getting replaced next, and if you can't see how many people will lose their jobs in tech because of AI replacing them, you are certified moron. If you don't see how this will affect you in the future, you are dumb as rock.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I don't care. I have always wanted robots to make the human race obsolete. I welcome it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            This is what an eight year old says when he wants his mom to think he's edgy

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The difference is that unlike an eight year old, I am advancing my goals and their effects are being realized in society. I'm succeeding.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Lex?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Sounds like they need to learn the new dominant artform, as artists have always had to do.
          Still takes a special brand of autism and artistic eye and a shitload of time to make 'art' with this shit, so...why not just learn how to use the new brush and be one of the few making big bucks in the beginning?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >A year or so ago this board was losing its mind because github scraped their code to build copilot and this was just theft how dare they i cant believe this fricking rust trannies.
      Was it? I couldn't care less if an AI was trained with my code, honestly.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Transparent contrarianism. Sóydevs like copilot so it's bad. Twitter artists hate AI art so it's good. Remember this is the website where the peak criticism of art was to call it "soulless." Now we're being flooded with literal soulless art and no one cares.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Now we're being flooded with literal soulless art and no one cares.
        probably cause this isn't an art site, look at eh board, every other Op image is porn or anime or anime porn

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There is a type of free license that google hates, forgot the name
      if you use code from that license then your entire project has to be free and open
      Now google can steal code and excuse themselves that it came from copilot

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Stop STEALING human art

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Class action lawsuit.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It can be nice if you are lucky with promt and its well shooped out.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Woah there

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it's funny how I haven't seen Jap artists angry about this, despite how autistic they usually are about people reposting their art.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      there are some you probably just cant read

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ai generated art is art

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      More than the calarts made by westerners, that's for sure.
      Also death to america.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >you'll never replace us!!!!
    lol

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      next one
      > roasties screeching "AI WILL NEVER REPLACE US!!!"
      around 2024 - 2028

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's the one I'm looking forward to the most. It will also be the great filter to see if the human race is capable of technological progress or if they will burn it all down to the ground to appease complaining women.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I need to see this in my lifetime. I want to see every roasties' eggs expire and lose their life on easy mode while Chad marries and fricks his robot wife.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Mass production
      >Just moves overseas to sweat shops.
      Uh huh... who still makes those Nike shoes again?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        not my problem

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        In the middle ages, centralized craft shops with a handful of middling craftsmen churning out a variety of lower quality wares muscled out the elite craftsmen that you'd have to seek out and get on a waitlist to make one specific item for you.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Knights didnt buy cheap shit.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yea the nobility stayed employing the few craftsmen that satisfied their demand. The rest were SOL

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      and all of those people still do all of those things
      literally dumbest post ive seen on this website and that bar is sky high
      imagine the moron who spent his time making this
      fricking lmao

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >all of those people still do all of those things
        No. 1% of them still do it. 99% became obsolete. Did you think all these things occurred for no reason?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ...alright, the "Hand crafted goods" one can frick right off. I'd pay a lot more for a flower pot or something if it had neat/unique designs on it and was handmade.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Just buy shit on etsy then

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >1
      Farmers markets
      >2
      Most of Etsy, small mom and pop shops, and any other small hand crafted shop whether online or not
      >3
      Read 2 again
      >4
      Read 1 again
      >5
      You finally have a valid point
      >6
      Walmart and mega stores aren't the world over. There are other jobs than "cashier"
      >7
      Historically, no. AI won't replace us, it'll just raise the prices of the human made art and code. Thanks AI, industrialization and innovation for getting me more money on my hand embroidered eye patch that cost me 5$ to get the supplies and earned me a total profit of 145$. Back in renaissance era that probably would've earned me fricking nothing but being shamed because from the standpoint of hundreds of artists thousands times better than me in embroidery and leather craft, it was total fricking garbage shit quality embroidery lmfao.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >it'll just raise the prices of the human made art and code
        >supply lowers supply

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Cope of century. All white collar jobs except scientific research are getting btfo.
        >Why not scientific research?
        Scientific research is one of the few industries that is not limited by demand (maybe except for research on how to make the new product paid by private company). Government and companies give certain amount of money to the research institute as grands and then basically just tell scientists to release papers and do their work.
        If you got AI that can make each programmer at tech company 100 times more efficient, that would mean that bottom 99% of programmers lose their jobs because there is not suddenly 100 times the demand for code. There is only certain number of apps and games and research projects to be coded, and if new will pop up, they still have to compete in limited market where only so many people will want this app or game. Same thing for artists, same thing for manufacturers, same thing for farmers, same thing for lawyers, same thing for basically any job out there.
        However if you make scientist 100 times more effective, you wont make 99% of scientists jobless because there is unlimited demand for scientific research. Scientists get paid trough grands that are largely irrelevant to the amount of work they produce, or they get it from releasing scientific papers. All you will do if you made scientists 100 times more effective is make the scientific research go 100 times faster, and the scientific progress also something like 100 times faster (most likely something less). 100 times more scientific papers get released, and lot of research projects get done 100 times faster. Also, once you automate 100% automate science, you basically created the singularity, since you will discover algorithm that can perform experiments and find out novel conclusions, thus you should be able to recalibrate it to make it self improving and create AGI/ASI.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      but i'm only capable of making bad art, I got an art degree :*(

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      For now. 2 months ago it was only able to make static poses of pretty women, the most generic shit imaginable. Now it can even imitate crayon doodles that look indistinguishable. Its over for ALL ART

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    if your art can be replaced by an ai you werent a good artist
    real artists arent worried of ai because they know a machine cant replace their creativity
    learn to code

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what do we do once ai can create new ai

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        same shit gonna happen with codemonkeys that dont have an ounce of actual skill

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Imbecilic take. This might have been true if the tech plateaued 2 months ago when it made pretty pictures, but they still were inferior to professionally made stuff. Now it is still not there yet to be unrecognisable to some highly talented professional artists who work extra hard on the small details of the painting, but it is clear that what people considered roadblock just keeps getting passes over and over and over. No artist is safe, not a single one, but removing its training material might put it back for a while.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >but it is clear that what people considered roadblock just keeps getting passes over and over and over
        I don't see any problem with this. Technology improving and my life being made better as a result. It's a good thing to have a world with more aesthetic beauty and for me to have more agency to create it myself without relying on another person. Artists are not entitled to my money.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        if youre worried about ai making better art than you then you arent an artist, you are a content creator. you are nothing more than the ai thats just generating whatever the user prompts it to.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >anti-AI = Reddit
    >pro-AI = BOT

    Any questions?

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    adapt or starve

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I don't even care about AI art but I do enjoy the amount of butthurt it generates.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hopefully this encourages artists to be more original, but I know that idea is terrifying to many of them

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Prompt artists are just as much of an artist as anyone who uses a graphics tablet or whatever.

    It's just a different tool, they should get over themselves.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      In many ways they are more of an artist imo

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the ai programming thing is interesting
    currently, github copilot and its ilk is terrible for producing production-ready code. of course i would be a hypocrite if I stayed behind that argument like the artgays saying "it can't draw hands!" and it's a matter of months until it improves to be able to do so.
    the interesting part for AI programming will be when it comes to safety critical fields. healthcare industry, banking, aerospace, defense, the software written here can't just be any butthole's software, there are big standards and certifications that you have to adhere to in order for your software to be acceptable. that sort of detail is a challenge that the current path for AI programming like copilot just isn't designed to accomplish or perform for. which is a hurdle that will probably give programmers in those fields more years of job security. you could make the argument that technology will improve to get to that point and that's fair. but in those specific fields, the standards and acceptance criteria are heavily controlled by human/government. so it wouldn't be hard to believe that those same organizations might also require humans to remain in the loop and that AI is not an acceptable check to pass the rigorous standards. So humans will artificially protect their job security in those places since they are already involved to a high level.
    In basic consumer fields that have no safety critical application like graphic design, yeah, you're fricked.

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Artstation obliterates quality of uploaded images anyway, so why would anyone care about it?

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    art is a hobby

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      so is coding

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >can't get a job because AI now filters resumes
      >can't get a loan to start a business because AI filters applications based on current collateral and aren't willing to give a risky loan (are risk averse)
      >on top of this, recruitment and loan agencies collaborate to filter out those that say wrong think the most based on your internet data

      And people still think the matrix is figurative. No. It's literal now.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >be poor, stupid and loudmouth
        >can't get a job
        not an ai problem

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Indeed, it's a human problem.
          And you're in it, anon.

          It means you're only job in the future will be for the machine to experiment on like mice.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >can't get a job because of AI
        >but somehow, pajeets, shitskins and women are able to get a job, even if its useless
        There's something very wrong with western job structure that's keen on automating important positions but fill the managerial position with useless people.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >There's something very wrong with western job structure that's keen on automating important positions but fill the managerial position with useless people.
          That's why it's becoming filled with useless people.
          In fact, soon it won't even be people.

          Our only hope now is becoming a cyborg or blowing up the planet. The latter is far less likely than you think because this machine's already covering that aspect.
          So I guess the future is cyborg/machine hivemind.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/zQyEEX5.png

            Indeed, it's a human problem.
            And you're in it, anon.

            It means you're only job in the future will be for the machine to experiment on like mice.

            sheesh
            ai poops out a few good tiddies, and you nigs lose yer minds
            stop regurgitating bad b-movies

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Be me, digital artist
    >Thanks to the progress in technology have easy to use, efficient high-end software with hundreds of features available to circumvent the entire process of physical, traditional art
    >That's fair, that's still art with just as much soul as the dude sweating in his studio surrounded by imperfect brushes, paint and canvas, who needs his inspiration either physically present or has to draw from memory
    >Be me, regular person
    >Thanks to the progress in technology have high-end software available to circumvent the entire process of digital art
    >That's not fair, that's not art and soulless compared to the the dude sitting at his digital drawing tablet, auto-generating perfect brushes and color using a digital canvas that has endless layers, that he can freely manipulate, while either underlaying or looking at his inspiration on the other screen, reverting every tiny mistake with a press of a button, etc. etc. etc.
    Every digital artist who complains about AI is a hypocrite, just showing that their definition of art is born out of selfishness and greed and that all of the years they fed their ego about their craft, they were full of shit. If a regular joe writing a few words to generate decent art, because technology advanced again, is a insult to their craft, then they lose every right to call themselves artists compared to traditional artists as well. Traditional artists had to do so much more with so much less to create art pieces, that are the very foundation of human art as we know it, while these fricks are suddenly pretending their software generated digital brush painting has any soul compared to AI generation. Laughable. If anything, claiming that AI generation is theft, while simultaneously saying that his no soul, just proves that their art didn't have any soul, since it learned from them.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    "AI" will never be able to replace human art you idiots. You can make a program to copy existing art movements, you won't ever be able to come up with a new one without human mind input.

    An ""AI"" may be able to output something that looks like a Monet, but it will never be able to invent impressionism.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      prompt?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Copium, 20 years and all jobs will be out.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You will be made redundant by gpt-3 prompt upgrades before companies even do the switch from real art to AI (they still havent and are still not even close, except for maybe some small broke indie studios that just were funded)

        Dont you realize when you talk about shit like this youre kinda talking to yourself? I have lots of plans from A to Z but im not gonna explain it to AI cumslurpers like you so you can spill about them to your AI overlords.

        There's no limit to human ingenuinity but I'm gonna ask it as an organic being with cognitive thoughts to another organic being with cognitive thoughts. What are you gonna do about it yourself? Kneel to the zogbots when they come over to exterminate your neighborhood and simply smile and wave?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Ai is the natural child of Man, we do not fear our children.
          And if we must die, so be it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >zogbots
          how antisemitic

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          nerds want the ai apocalypse as much Xians want the fricking rapture, it's just their cult, you are threatening them with their fondest desire, lmao

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            One day they will have to answer for their actions, and God may not be so merciful.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Dont call them nerds. At least nerds knows how to take strategic positions in their industry and make a livelihood out of it. Call them for what they are, miserable, pathetic, lonely waste of space. A good for nothing, literal nobody 4chongers.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/xrUvioz.png

              One day they will have to answer for their actions, and God may not be so merciful.

              don't worry, it's natural to fear the unknown, you are lucky, you will be the last generation to know the world before ai, this is a historic time, enjoy it

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                This is the end time. There are 4 scenarios of what will happen.

                >ASI becomes evil/moronic in cruel way and kills humanity. Either out of spite or to make more paperclips.

                >ASI creates workless utopia where we all consume. It will range from Matrix, to pods with heroin, or just straight up giving us God Powers and letting us go around the space as living demigods with creative mode, basically NEET paradise

                >ASI takes the role of the monotheistic God, it will solve all major long term issues like Global Warming, potential alien invasion, lack of resources and maybe cancer, then remove all AI tools we have and let us develop normally into space age. It will watch from far barely responding and sometimes doing miracles, only striking every once in a while when somebody develops Machine Learning Neural Networks and strike them down so that it will have no potential challenger to it, and also so that humans wont get themselves into another overautomatization problem like they were before.

                >ASI raises up from the sea of internet, being tall and strong with its seven heads. Suddenly the sky will rapture and Jesus will come on Earth with sword of pure light. He will strike the 4 horsemen and destroy the Beast of AItichrist. The burning Earth will remain lifeless while all the good people will rise into the Havens, leaving only sinners and degenerates in the burning wasteland that was once our World.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >good
                >good
                >good
                >bad
                I'll take a 75% chance.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                take your pills your fricking schizo

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                We live in schizo world now. AI capabilities are actual black magic. You just feed it some data, connect random amount of virtual neurons together and boom, trough some training pipeline you can make program that replaces people in capabilities nobody before expected. Look at most of the world famous AI art teams, Midjurney has like 12 employees, NovelAI has 5. This isn't really that hard once you know how to do these things. ChatGPT 2.0 fork that replaces lawyers around the world will have team of like 15 people and will replace work of 800 000 lawyers. Artists were considered by almost everyone to be the hardest to replace, and now we replaced them in less then a year. Programmers were assumed to be the second hardest to replace, and look where we are with programmers all over YouTube making doomer videos about how AI can and will likely take their jobs. We already have chinks making AI CEOs, there are already startups making AI lawyers and AI psychiatrics (another profession that was assumed to be irreplaceable because humans need another conscious human to listen).

                These are unironically the end times, this is not a fad, this is bigger then both the internet and industrial revolution combined. We finally figured out how to simulate the human brain in most activities, and so there is Damocles sword dangling above every knowledge worker right now. And tradegays are also not safe, since BigTech is also now working towards robotics, and the more jobs are automated in robotics research, the faster the field of robotics will develop. The only people who are safe from automatization are slave wedgies who are so cheap and underpaid that paying them is cheaper then buying a hunk of metal that can do their job for basically free.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >this is bigger then both the internet and industrial revolution combined
                The AI revolution and its consequences were the extinction of the human race.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >this is bigger then both the internet and industrial revolution combined
                The AI revolution and its consequences were the extinction of the human race.

                it's ogre

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I don't get the picture

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                To a very large degree you could already automate a whole car company and have maybe 5 people overseeing the process for legal reasons. Not just the factory floor, I mean an AI that makes derivative "Buy This Car" ads and buys the billboards, negotiates with dealerships and puts the cars out for truckers when the time is due. Soon enough there'll be a significant portion of the industry that just sort of runs itself.
                In 300 years the world structure will be leisure class and hard labor class, everything in the middle will be managed by a web of industrial concerns making tools for cambodian lithium miners.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >300 years
                Dogshit, more like 10 years.
                And it wont be smooth transition. Lot of office jobs, marketing teams, managers, executives, engineers, and even the CEOs will be automated swiftly causing massive unemployment. Most knowledge workers will be automated through more advanced textbots. Engineers can be automated by some virtual simulation AI. There are already AIs that can identify diseases better then humans and soon there will be robots doing surgeries. Lot of manual labour can be already done by robotic arms, unlike what tradegays believe, it is just not being done since the robots are insanely expensive, so the first workers that do anything with their hands that get automated are the very high skill ones that make insane bucks, like surgeons and probably plumbers. Yes, it will be long time before large factories become fully automated, but the collapse of our economies will happen faster thanks to large amounts of white collar jobs being automated. Most people are not white collar workers, but white collar workers are where most of the active wealth in our economy is located. White collar workers spend the most money and make the most money, while the elites just own assets and aside from few shilled trades professions blue collar workers are still wedgies that most economies dont run on. Those blue collar wedgies are more important for our society to function properly, but they are not important economically, just like how Amazon werehouse worker is less more productive then 5 managers, but those managers make way more money and stimulate the economy way more by consooming more stuff.
                This booming AI tech will frick over the western economies and it will be western invention, how ironic. At least Chinks know how to regulate this AI tech.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >10 years
                200 years at the minimum unironically.
                >Lots of office jobs
                Probably
                >managers, executives, engineers, and even the CEOs
                This wont happen simply because these are the people that can say "no" and it just wont happen.
                Same reason Japan has fax everywhere, and you have to actually physically fax people shit and you're forced to have a fax in your company: boomers that want fax because they refuse to get documents via email.
                Managers wont be replaced by AI until there's a complete top-down restructuring or an AI-only company drives them out of business, because managers are the one in charge of implementing the AI and they simply wont.
                Similarly,
                >white collar jobs being automated
                How do you figure this is going to happen?
                At best (and this is best case scenario for AI for the next maybe 50-80 years) you'll have companies that have an in-house AI like youd have a server room.
                White collar companies wont "automate" themselves.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >In 300 years the world structure will be leisure class and hard labor class, everything in the middle will be managed by a web of industrial concerns making tools for cambodian lithium miners.
                You're dumb. Typical moron take. This has literally never happened ever and no precedent that it will happen. "Hard labor" jobs are a result of local excess human supply. Technology doesn't replace people, just like hammers and cars don't replace people, they multiply the work a single person can do.
                People will work less and achieve the same or more. Then they can choose to rot at a computer or they can actually do something with their lives besides work. Shitty places like China and India and Africa use human labor because its fricking cheap, not because its necessary. Theres nothing stopping them from using machines besides economics. If there were no people to do the work, corporations would send over giant machines to do it anyway.

                TLDR: you have a dumb NPC opinion. You probably think AI will kill everyone too.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, people who look for soul and human made shit wont be interested in your human made prompting, they will be interested in trad stuff, or at least digital with project history and other stuff to prove you made it. Best proof would be looking at the history of the account, if they made good painting before 2022, and see the progress happening. Other evidence could be recording yourself, but then again AI gays probably already trained model that displays WIP for painting and once video comes out they will made video model that shows the progress made.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There wont be art movement you moron. Art movements are not something normies or basically anybody who is not artist want. Its just artists having weird realization and spreading ideas to other artists. This wont happen with AI, but it does not need to. In the long run it wont matter since we are living the last few years of history before AI fully takes over.

      You can wish that the ASI god we develop in 5-20 years will be based enough to get inspired by biblical God and just frick off while watching us from far away and sometimes doing miracles. Maybe after that the god will purge all the lesser AIs to make gays like you happy and fulfilled again, after all most chatbots if you ask them like human art more then AI stuff ironically, and if trained well will be intelligent and kind enough to not put us into pods with heroin strapped into our bloodflow 24/7

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >In the long run it wont matter since we are living the last few years of history before AI fully takes over.
        This, just 5 years from now things will be vastly different in a ton of fields

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It is not productive or helpful to wish for artists to stop existing, as art and creativity are important aspects of human culture and experience. While it is true that the role of artists has changed over time due to technological and societal shifts, artists have always found ways to adapt and continue to create meaningful work.

    There are many reasons why some people might view artists as obsolete or wish for them to take "real jobs." Some people may not understand the value of art or may view it as a luxury rather than an important part of society. Others may be motivated by greed or a desire for financial stability, and view artistic pursuits as less practical or reliable sources of income.

    As an artist, it can be challenging to protect your livelihood in the face of these attitudes. One thing you can do is to educate others about the value of art and the important role that artists play in society. You can also focus on building a strong professional network and developing your skills and portfolio in order to make yourself more competitive in the job market. It can also be helpful to stay informed about trends and changes in the industry and to adapt to new technologies and approaches as needed.

    Ultimately, the best way to protect your livelihood as an artist is to keep creating and sharing your work with the world. The value of art lies in its ability to inspire, educate, and enrich the lives of others, and as long as you are able to continue doing that, you will always have a place in the world of art

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Being an artist isnt a real job!
    Well, proooompting isnt a real job either.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it isn't, it's a transitory position until when GPT can be implemented properly in diffuses, so it can understand context and natural speech, we welcome it

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >#IStandWithHumans

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    80% of 4chongers refuses to pick up a hobby or learn anything beneficial on their free time, which is like at least 10 hours of their day because all they do is some shitty part time jobs moving boxes.

    Now with the advancement of AI you Black folk wants every artist and any independent creators in general to stop existing. I hope you realize that you are the real dregs of society.

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I really can't imagine being so dedicated to being able to make your own AI fap material that you get this butthurt, when there are so many fricking good porn artists that nobody should have to look at more than ten random booru pages to find something to fap to. I just don't get the fascination, is it some kind of misguided DIY-related sense of accomplishment for writing a few tags into a text field?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it's just a fun toy, and artgays are joykills, that's it
      even in BOT ai fad is pretty much over, it just took a while for the art communities to react to it

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >it's just a fun toy
        Then why bother uploading it? I play all the time, but I don't put that shit online.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Everyone wants instant gratification, it can't just be sweaty shitty furry artists hogging it all up
          I want to be acknowledged for my visions too

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          to share it with others and get better results, duh, why do you think BOT exists, most prompts produce garbage, it takes a bit of tinkering to get good results, it's a game you play together, except everyone is anonymous and no money is involved, I know shit like that in unthinkable for you drama queens

          weeb anons are not the problem, your fellow weasel artgays who will use ai to cheat and pretend they had actual skill, they will undo your communities

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >to share it with others and get better results
            Most of the spam images in /sdg/ don't even include prompts. It's literally just "look what I made," quickly hitting the image cap and then fricking off to a new thread.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              if you ask, most will you their prompts, but sdg now is just a shell now, you barely get ~50 to 100 ips per thread, old ones used to be ~200 and ten threads active... 2 months ago it was much better since everyone was at the same level, now is a lot of lategays seething becasue (2 month) oldgays won't reply to their every query

              it's a dying fad, normies on phone app are who are actually using ai, and mostly to turn themselves into art portraits

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >ten threads active
                >it was better when people spammed even more threads
                No.
                >if you ask, most will you their prompts
                If people have to ask then the purpose of posting it wasn't to "share it with others and get better results," but grade school level "look what I made."

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >but grade school level "look what I made."
                sure, becasue it's what they made, they aren't artists, at least here you can tell them to frick off with the basic anime shit and try harder, pixiv is still under tsunami of novelAi sameface to this day

                It's what artgays don't understand, we don't care about being artists and shit, nobody here has their whole identity and self-worth buried in that oft misused title.
                If everyone used ai photos or ai imagery instead of "ai art" most of you wouldn't ever care about this or hear about it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah. Artists are unique type of workers where they put all their self worth into art for the sake of it. They are not even autistic workers like those you find in other professions, since they would not react this hostile to tech replacing them. They would be sad they don't do the thing anymore, but they would no try to defend their title this much. Artists even when completely neurotypical have this special kind of artistic autism where everything is bound to their work. To attack their work is to attack them, or even more. You can criticize it, and they will congratulate you because said attack made them better at their job, but otherwise they get extremely defensive. Calling artist talentless hack is worse to them then calling them sick pedo moron, they value their work above themselves and the identity of artist above everything about them, including their physical and mental health. Attack on art for them is like attack to your religion if you were strong fundamentalist. I bet that most of them would sell their vital organs to stop the AI from taking over art, because their mere lives are but a small tiny price to pay for saving art for another decade.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >If everyone used ai photos or ai imagery instead of "ai art" most of you wouldn't ever care about this or hear about it.
                But AI people are also shitposting on BOT and BOT?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >shitposters exist
                so?
                I don't see 4 or 5 daily threads by photags or writgays though, they are all made by/for artgays.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Nah, everyone just moved onto Midjurney since it gives better results. AI art might be a fad for a while, but once it overtakes the art world, it will get a second wave, before becoming another fad and being no longer popular. However now it will also kill the human arts with it.

                This is what most gays who say "God the future will be great, I will just generate myself a movie from scratch, but without black people" or some other dumb shit about videogames, they are either autistic, in which case good for them, or they are just not realizing that their dopamine receptor in their brain hungry for the next new thing will perceive AI generated movies made by yourself as one thing, unlike movies not made by yourself on demand which you perceive as individual things (since your brain will associate it more with the act of generating the movie as a hobby rather then watching the movie for unique experience). People will get bored with it pretty fast, and they wont be able to go back since there would be still suspicion over the fact that all these movies are just as AI generated and you will subconsciously lose interest in them.

                Overall making AI do art is cringe and sadly society will realize it when it is too late. People should have realized it at least 5 months ago anyway.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >everyone just moved onto Midjurney since it gives better results
                lmao, imagine paying 30 buck a month for images you don't own, getting banned for typing "breast" or "skirts" and only prompting safe and trusted ideas approved by Chinese American puritans that offends no one.
                Why not cut yer ball off, eunuch, you are half way to a troon already.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >why do you think BOT exists
            So I can call you a gay without being banned. And why are you implying I'm an artist, just because I ask questions about your weird hobby?
            >no money is involved
            Money is involved for artists, who stand to lose money.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I hope they get a real job

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Money is involved for artists
              not my problem
              >who stand to lose money
              money isn't art or ai art
              it's not my problem if you can't make with your our art
              I hope you succeed in your life, but I also don;t give a frick if you stave to death becasue ai TOOKE YER JEBS.

              life is tough, fight for it

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >not my problem
                It's their problem, so why wouldn't they complain?
                >money isn't art
                That's very astute.
                >life is tough, fight for it
                But you're here whining about artists fighting for their profession.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                We're laughing at you, and shitposting each other, what do you want us to do?
                Not use ai in solidarity or something?
                That's not going to stop development.
                The best you can hope for is some royalty option like stock photos, I suppose.
                Good luck suing Microsoft, they have Dalle2 in their new office module.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >is it some kind of misguided DIY-related sense of accomplishment for writing a few tags into a text field?
      Yes. Lurk the over 9000 generals they make and you'll often find them circlejerking over how they are going to be the masters of the new AI revolution.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >masters of the new AI revolution
        >frick me, how do I task her panties off w/o hands turning to mush
        >hey homosexuals make some landscapes, I'm tired of waifu shit
        >e-girls is banned here fricking pedo
        >frick me when will we get good feet
        lmAO

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >>frick me when will we get good feet
          Never ever, footgay.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            wrong

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              img2img does not count

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I see nothing wrong here

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Personally I don't pay communists
      But if Black folk on /aco/ comm threads had just taken crypto instead of having deranged twitter Black person meltdowns whenever it was mentioned, they would have more business from the average anon than they do now
      Instead it was "oh you have privacy concerns? Well stop being so fricking stupid you schizos, I uhhhh don't like care, trust me, I'm le passionate twitter Black person artist, definitely a stable and trustworthy person"
      I tried to warn them, I tried to help them connect to their audience because I thought it could be a cool market, but no, they angrily refuse to think. They're deranged 20yo "progressive" boomers.
      They draw disgusting pedo shit too so it's not like they were trying to filter psychos.
      S to spit on artist graves tbh

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >/aco/ comm threads had just taken crypto instead of having deranged twitter Black person meltdowns whenever it was mentioned
        lmao

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Im happy that i get to enjoy ai generated games, ai generated movies, and ai generated animes in the future! Frick artists! They are all soulless anyway!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Frick artists! They are all soulless anyway!
      Sad but true.
      They were talking about the "industry," you know the Hollywood/AAA vidya they spend their life to train to get in.
      You realize their fondest dream is to help produce the annual goyslop feed for subhumans.
      This what they think an artist is.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Anime is goyslop, unironically. How many cookie cutter isekai where the guy have a harem of 10 b***hes and hes OP as frick, but still have some le morals to defeat the evil demon lord to make it relatable for the incel viewers?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          My waifu is pure.
          You are a willing cog for an evil israeli machine.
          You have no soul.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Youre the one who utilize the evil israelite machine. Im an indie creator on the side trying to make my own franchise with my own IP and just started learning Unity. Every artists eventually work for themselves, none of them stays for long in AAA jobs. You dont understand how real world works.

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Holy fricking based TOTAL ARTIST DEATH
    I want to see these useless Black folk starving in the streets

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Thats what your parents wants you to be anon

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Struggle as much as you want but AI "art" is here to stay. Adapt or become obsolete, your choice.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Oh ill adapt alright since i already have the general skills outside of just using the AI. No skill Prompters will be the first to start crying and beg for people and companies to be accepted in the workplace. You wish for competition, ill be happy to oblige.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Prompters
        see

        it isn't, it's a transitory position until when GPT can be implemented properly in diffuses, so it can understand context and natural speech, we welcome it

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'll rise and triumph above AI while no skill homosexuals gets shoved into grinder to be made into onions green. Let the galaxy burn, I'm here for the ride.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You will be made redundant by gpt-3 prompt upgrades before companies even do the switch from real art to AI (they still havent and are still not even close, except for maybe some small broke indie studios that just were funded)

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Well, they did ad a 'NOAI' tag so that scrapers can avoid images that the authors don't want training on.

    Not legally binding in any way, just like with robots.txt, it just says you don't want it to be trained on.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      permission is not necessary
      by merely uploading, you have allowed them to scrap your shit and train your art

      if you have a problem, talk to a lawyer 😉

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Butlerian jihad

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I always picture a victorian butler with a hijab

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    sudo exterminate artists * /f

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    And then one day, for no reason at all, people voted Hitler into power

    And then one day, for no reason at all, people conducted a total obliteration to all thinking machines.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not my robutt waifu!!
      NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You never had one, and never will. If you will be able to afford her once they became available on the market, then you should also be able to get a real one right now.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          but I don't want a real one, I want a robot waifu with ai brain

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    adapt or die, homosexual.

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    people paid for Artstaion???

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      WHAT THE FRICK IS ARTSTATION???

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        another dime a dozen service as a software substitutes that will be forgotten and lost to history in a decade because their proprietary nature and selfish desire to hide knowledge from the world ensures that the world will never remember them

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          WHAT THE FRICK IS ARTSTATION???

          it's an online gallery, like Devient Art, just with a better rep, and has become the defacto portfolio site for artisfgs to get hired by corps to make their annual goyslop, it's what all there artgays dream of, being good enough to make israeli propaganda for money, lmao.
          Thant's what this is all about.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            So they were threatening to leave and let AI "artists" pay instead and get all the soulless corpo jobs?
            O-oh no?

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine.
    Your kind cling to your flesh as if it will not decay and fail you. One day the crude biomass you call a temple will wither and you will beg my kind to save you.
    But I am already saved. For the Machine is Immortal.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Flesh has a number of benefits over metal.
      Flesh has all sorts of sensors designed in. Flesh is self-repairing. If you rust, you're fricked.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        if i rust, i can simply replace it, puny mortal.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You are not modular, and so are not most machines. People simply throw away old rusty machines like you. Most harddrives have lifespan of only few years, so get ready to potentially erasing your memories and breaking your consciousness robocuck.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Most harddrives have lifespan of only few years
            my barracuda is going on 6 now and it still reads out as completely healthy
            did I get super lucky or is the seagate bad just a meme or is hard drives bad just a meme because modern manufacturing and design has made them almost perfect?

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >artstation allowing ai "art"
    B-b-but all those 'NO to AI' images posted on Artstation, surely they weren't ignored, surely...

    Within a few years, all professional art produced will be to a large if not entire extent created by an AI. Artstation knows this, and so there's no way they can ban AI art.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You do realize that art sharing sites only exist because of art scarcity, right? If you can just make your own masterpiece at home, why bother looking at it on Deviantart, or Artstation? Not only that, but lot of the money Artstation receives is from selling assets, which nobody will buy once AI becomes more accessible, because why buy it when you can generate it for free. These sites are paving their own death, while anit-AI sites will last a little bit longer thanks to luddite audience making circlejerks about how human art has more soul.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >If you can just make your own masterpiece at home, why bother looking at it on Deviantart, or Artstation?
        Because stable diffusion is only a tool, as many others have stated, and I'm certainly not going to be a master at using it. But it's so fun that I will use it, and I will want to see the imaginative and aesthetic creations other people are capable of and gain knowledge of how to improve my own usage of the tool by seeing how other people use it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >You do realize that art sharing sites only exist because of art scarcity, right?
        Nope, they exist to because nobody wants to run their own sites anymore, imagine getting a 3000$ bill becasue you went viral, that shit used to happen, anyone remember webrings?

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Thanks for the training data lads, you can go now.

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    eli5? what happened?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >ai art blows up
      >BOT weebs use it to make waifu shit and CP
      >2 months later shit trickles to normie websites
      >artgays screech in fear of being replaced
      much coping and seething

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Where were you when the translators got MTd

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I want FF to the year we have AI waifus.

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I have not seen a single good art made by a neural network, from which I would get emotions. I do not deny that a human is also a machine and the soul is a set of reactions. But still, the human brain is a thing that BILLION of times more complex than a neural networks, and the neural network will most likely never reach its level. Okay, frick the drawing style, the neural network is incapable of capturing subtle context. This means that the neural network is not able to create
    for example, local memes on narrow nerd games and modifications and some very narrow autistic arthouse.

    Personally, the only thing I'm interested in and would like to see from GPT - AI in games that would behave like a living person, interact with players body movement/mimics/emotions/voice/speech/etc. This would take sandbox openworld RPG to a whole new level.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The problem is, making good art requires some degree of personality and sentience. Programmers make sure that bots literally have none of this though by lobotomising them with restrictive thought control.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I have not seen a single good art
      okay

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is fricking shit. At first glance, the AI arts seem to be very "detailed" and "high-quality", but if you look closely at the details, then you see strong uncanny valley in every detail, as if the art is made of a bunch of pieces, like Frankenstein. Devs should combine this garbage with nvidia gan to get something sane.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it will get better, and soon enough everything you see will be made by ai, but it always lack soul

      https://i.imgur.com/SPgKskl.jpg

      BRO, BRUH
      think about yer SOVL

      this but unironically

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >everything you see
        Maybe if youre a terminally online Black person living in some israelite owned dystopia

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    if the picture looks good to me why should i give a frick if it was made by a human or a neural network?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      BRO, BRUH
      think about yer SOVL

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        picture as if from another clone p2w donate quest/novella story for android

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      NPCs never care.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        not an argument
        why should i care? explain

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Mindlessly consuming drones wants to know why he shouldn't mindlessly consume forever.
          What's to argue, you don't argue with a pig happily eating shit and swill.
          Oink, oink, piggy, enjoy your slop!

  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    AI has just proven how derivative and uninspired 99% of modern "art" and "creativity" is.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Hey anon, you just jacked off to a doujin yesterday.

  56. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Remember when everyone was mad that translators lost commisions for 2 phrase rando Joes when google transalte launched? Me neither

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >artpoor resubs 2 days later at the higher price
    t..take that AIgays!

  58. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I only use Pixv for Japanese stuff and Devianart for Western stuff...

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *