artists SEETHING over AI art

Absolute salt mine in the comments whenever something related to AI art is posted on normie social medias. Why are they like this

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >absolute dogshit low effort bait thread
    >ios filename
    every time

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is why I take every opportunity to support counterfeiters stealing art from twitter artists and making street fashion tshirts to sell on aliexpress, frick them.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I literally cannot stop thinking about iGods

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Lol look at that dumb b***h
    To her, supporting art means buying it
    She thinks about a price tag and nothing else about art

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      if you go on twitter every artist will say support them and post the 40 different services they can be sent money with

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    uh AI bros have we just got BTFO'd

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >steals
      I pirated all my games, music, books and programs. And now I should care about artbabies?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        BASED

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This is something I should've asked a long time ago, but how are these "hidden" merchants/Pepes/Satanias etc. generated?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            img2img tab on the Stable Diffusion UI

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Is that also used for the photorealistic sòyjaks?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                not him but i think it's used for any picture where it's obviously based on a specific existing picture

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        their argument is moronic anyways because if they stood by their morals they would refuse to ever use a reference

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >be artist
      >create something in the style of other artists
      >this is okay dokey patokey 🙂

      >be computer Black person
      >ask computer to create something in the style of other artists
      >REEEEEEEEEE

      modern internet "artists" are soulless as shit, they being replaced by computers was but a formality

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ^Wisdom

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They are being ableist. There is a guy on /b/ that is an artist but he got nerve damage so he cant draw with the hand he used to draw with so he uses ai now

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This but unironically.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/NFm3VFM.png

          >using libleft to fight libleft

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          as a POC who struggles with depression and racism from society, ai art is my only hope of making art on the same level as artists. it's not fair that other people are better artists due to circumstances out of my control. I'm glad ai art is bringing more equity to the art world...

        • 1 year ago
          infinite fanart machine

          https://i.imgur.com/QnCmXmk.gif

          [...]
          >using libleft to fight libleft

          as a POC who struggles with depression and racism from society, ai art is my only hope of making art on the same level as artists. it's not fair that other people are better artists due to circumstances out of my control. I'm glad ai art is bringing more equity to the art world...

          I'm not reading this shit so someone give us a TLDR please

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Artists are on the wrong side of history. I just read the article:
            >5 reasons AI art is a good thing. Number 4 will SHOCK you!
            and it opened my eyes to why AI art is good and artists are bad. AI artists are literally the same as Ukraine fighting against evil Russia.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              cant tell if ironic or not
              good bait

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Couldnt they just pay a commision? Or is it better that the commision is free now?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      didnt read

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      When did artists start caring so much about copyright?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Since they started to make money through coomers via patroen drawing low effort FotM anime/furry bawds.
        It's hard to compete with a machine that can poop out ~60 of these per hour.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >implying that people like Lichtenstein aren't considered plagiaristic hacks
        "Fine artists", especially those of the conceptual variety, are complete and utter homosexuals getting high off their own jankem. They're as different from your typical drawgay as a white collar employee is from a blue collar one.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >considered plagiaristic hacks
          /ic/ is a dozen ngmi crabs jerking wacking other off seething at everything (before ai art)
          irl:
          https://www.moma.org/artists/3542

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They only care when they can make money off it
        Kek petite bourgeois gays are going to starve in the future

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/yooGyIh.jpg

        >implying that people like Lichtenstein aren't considered plagiaristic hacks
        "Fine artists", especially those of the conceptual variety, are complete and utter homosexuals getting high off their own jankem. They're as different from your typical drawgay as a white collar employee is from a blue collar one.

        They pretend to hate the modern art grift, but feel threatened when ai makes the same soulless coombait better than them, simple as.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >omg literally like, literal literally, theft, i mean like do research, like literally
      got it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        forgot a bit of
        >muh NFTs
        also

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Artists are fricking greedy pigs and they were the first group of people to steal people's money with NFTs. Zero sympathy for "artists" and their woes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hilarious how so many midwits are just parroting talking points fed to them by assmad artists. Fricking obnoxious cattle.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >its not stealing, j-just referencing, fair use!!!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >what was stopping you from being a skilled artist? Your lack of patience, discipline, and hard work?

      I find it funny that those are the same reasons why this "artist" can't find a real job.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >tells others to research
      >doesn't research herself and has no clue how it works
      makes me think

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/YC00rMr.jpg

      Absolute salt mine in the comments whenever something related to AI art is posted on normie social medias. Why are they like this

      BOT anons /misc/ requesting help

      [...]

      [...]

      Can you check what kind of bot is this

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Try prompt injecting it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Anon I am not that techie

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Picasso said great artists steal.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        picasso also REEEEd about cameras when they came out when in reality camera freed artists so they didn't have to waste their life making fricking church portraits

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Do you think they will care when you pirate games, or music, or movies?
      better for them to keep working hard at their jobs instead of having a hateful streak in AIs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The point he's making is just as true for human artists. They all copy other artstyles, learn off other art. It's just normal. As long as it isn't a literal trace or heavily copied nobody cares.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Humans do this every single time they draw. Theres no such thing as having no inspiration or no bias. Every single thing you do is influenced by how you've seen others do things and that is especially true for art. Artists rip off others work alllllll the fricking time and they dont give credit. Its hilarious seeing these terminally online "artists" get absolutely fricking obliterated.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The only REAL artists were the first cavemen.
        Everyone after are copygay hacks.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > Why are they like this
    they fed on israelitelywood "muh scary rogue ai's" psyops, so theyre scared of everything that has "AI" in the naming.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >seething is people factually pointing out that ai "art" is not only not art but sucks in quality
    lol artlets can't tell good art from bad art so they believe all ai "art" is good. that's how talentless they are

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >artists SEETHING
    except they aren't and you are just saying they are, you're creating a false narrative because you want them to. you are desperate for artists to seethe, but they don't even know what this software is lol, no one does. this thread is some very serious cope.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they have nothing bad to say about the actual composition, but only the fact its ai made. Yes they are seething and yes you need to go back

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >yes they are seething
        >BECAUSE I SAID SO, OK?
        >BECAUSE A RANDOM NOBODY ON TWITTER SAID SO, OK?
        lol

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yes because every comment is about how its ai, not about its mistakes or flaws. are you remedial anon?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >twitter represents real life
            LOL, this is how delusional you are, you seriously need to get help and go outside

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I'm pretty sure that's instagram? The movement for legal action suggests there is some disturbance. Also somehow the artists that are about to lose their entire livelihoods are still less emotional than you lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >you're being emotional for pointing out what i'm saying is made up
                lol ok

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                anon, unless you are suggesting those are all astroturfing bots in OP's picrel, then nothing is being made up

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like pure pants-shitting rage to me

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >avatar literally looks like a stylized soijak mish mashed from other art styles
          do inkcels really

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >45 seconds
        nah son 10 on my gpu

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This is too funny, they have to rationalize it and assume AI is somehow cheating or they'd go insane

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >IT HAS TO BE C-CHEATING!!
          >HOW CAN A MACHINE CREATE ART, ABSURD!!
          If everyone used the term "images" instead of art, they would be too stupid to get offended.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't get it, does AI hack image hosting websites and cut out portions of an image?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You wouldn't download a car

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          not only that, but I can even do it with no internet connection. it's like magic!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >~~*cali*~~-style
        >artist
        Activating my almonds

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        > missing
        was 100% convinced it's satire until the wall of text

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >45 seconds
        what kind of shit GPU you have?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ok paintpig

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This, c**ts on /ic/ have a better understanding of ai than these new wave cultists do.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I find that hard to believe, also artist literally have a golden goose at their fingertips as you mention

      This, c**ts on /ic/ have a better understanding of ai than these new wave cultists do.

      artists in Theory would have a better understanding of what is aesthetic and what is not.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        IT'S NOT AN AI ART SEETHE THREAD WITHOUT THE REDDIT SUICIDE WALL

        BEST POST

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://www.deviantart.com/forum/devart/general/2689053/

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I love to bully AI "artists" fricking hilarious.
        >AI artists are artists

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          vile artcels

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >inkcels have no creativity so they have to appropriate /misc/ memes

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ohhh god it feels so good to see them mad,

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I see more cope and seethe in the eu regulation thread tbh.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      BOT at its core has been about incels making variations on "own the libs" threads since 2015. However, when incels get owned, which is every day, they dismiss and avoid it to protect the ego which results in no or low traffic anti-BOTner threads. This was most laughable if you were on /misc/ when trump lost .

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >saying AI shit is shit is now "seething"
    op gargles cum

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >t. pencuck

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >i-i-it's good art but it's ai!
      sounds like seething to me

  12. 1 year ago
    sage

    >another pajeet shilling AI
    sage goes in every field

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I was about to ask who made em to go support the artist
    no you weren't homosexual.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I find it funny
    >its not art
    After years of telling everyone and anyone that anything is art and to not judge the shit modern art now when AI art comes onto the scene and makes decent artwork the artist come out and reee about how it is not art. Too late paint pigs you had plenty of time to define what art was and you passed on it, now when its in your interest to define it you show how shallow your beliefs are.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      kek this
      >ANYTHING CAN BE ART
      >NOOOOOOOO THAT CANT BE ART

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    paintpigs seething fills me with glee

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >fighting an invisible war no one knows is happening
      >against artists
      lol why though, this has got to be the silliest thing that's not really happening i've seen on this stupid site

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        im having fun with cool technically. its technologically illiterate doodlers who are shitting their diapers over nothing, just more entertainment for me.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >its technologically illiterate doodlers who are shitting their diapers
          whatever you want to believe i guess, but there's no evidence this is happening
          >just more entertainment for me
          sounds like you need a better hobby

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not fighting any war, just enjoying my animu ai art

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          sex with nanachi

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Don't buy ai art
    They are so stupid

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    are there irl pics of any these artgays ? i wanna make homeless versions of them

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Artists should have learned from photoshop that their time was numbered.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We aren't going to stop. If you think we will, you're delusional. Oh, you can enjoy this theft for a while, but you'll soon realize that you will NEVER be able to share AIshit without getting swamped in downvotes and mockery. AIshitters will be hounded into the grave. You chose this path.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >downvotes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >le heckin downvotes!
      Terminal preddit brain

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >you'll soon realize that you will NEVER be able to share AIshit without getting swamped in downvotes and mockery.
      What if I just "forget" to inform you that it's AI generated? You know. Like half the news articles you read these days?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Using AI will get me mocked by people that don't even know what bathroom to use
      WTF? I hate AI now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://twitter.com/sabana_ili
      I hope you're more popular than this random AI artist.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        damn, that looks exactly like the character.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        but that's just getting carried by slapping on the most popular fotm anime hashtag in the tweet

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Just like regular artists lmao

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yes, not denying that

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yesterday I tried to drive to the store but it was difficult because of all the downvotes out on the road that day.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I do not get the public's reaction to this AI shit at all. They are all using """""""AI"""""" img2img tiktok filters but when some dude posts an AI generated image in his social media he gets attacked. WTF it's only acceptable if globohomosexual trillion dollar companies are doing it?

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Do we need another AI art thread if it isn't about any new updates? Just post in /sdg/

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is just the new "kony 2012, net neutrality, change your background picture, slava ukraini" evolution. They will get bored of it and move to the next current thing in a couple weeks. They are goldfish.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is different seeing as this is mostly people in a certain trade (art) going ape shit about something they feel will destroy their jobs.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        patroen scams aren't jobs
        and most of the artgays screeching can't draw for shit & won't ever make money with their art either way
        it's just a new cause these failures can twit about, and they get to represent & pretend to be actually successful artists via reflected glory

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This. Commission scamming isnt a real job. They dont pay taxes. They are just stealing money from people, money that actual working people spend time and effort to earn.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Hey, anal vore don't just draw themselves.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Sounds like you're just some idiot chud who's mad he couldn't figure out how to draw correctly and had to resort to fake stolen AI "art". LOL

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              im too stupid to do AI prompts so I just right click save in stable diffusion threads

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              To be fair, it's precisely why artgays hate this, no professional artist will be replaced by ai right now.
              The only real threat is coomer simps using ai to gen fetish art for themselves.
              And ai can't even do that right.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Pythagoras should be closer to Diogenes there. He started a communist cult that worshiped beans (not kidding)

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Pythagoras should be closer to Diogenes there. He started a communist cult that worshiped beans (not kidding)
                This couldnt be any further from the truth. Pythagoras taught that beans were evil. Students of his school were chased by thugs and stopped and allowed themselves to be killed because they refused to escape through a field of beans out of fear of touching them.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Pythagoras should be closer to Diogenes there. He started a communist cult that worshiped beans (not kidding)

                wut

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                He only feared beans because they contained the souls of the dead. Ancestor worship was common in many cultures thus I consider he was simply afraid of disturbing his ancestors' spirits if he interfered with the innards of beans.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yeah, but he had cute boy simps

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                beans

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    are all the inkcel posts here ironic?
    you guys can't be serious, right?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You can delude yourself all you want, but apart from the extreme curves, no sane individual is sexually attracted to Black folk.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        okay, low t pencil dick closet homosexual incel

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not a closeted homo, I can clearly state that I'm bisexual, but I can clearly say that dark skin is a no go for me.
          The darker I'd go would be a northen african femoid, everything else is completely unappealing for me.
          I'm thankful that I was born without being an extremely sex obsessed person like most homosexuals here are, who only can think of wetting their wieners.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            shut up homo

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >I'm bisexual
            >I was born without being an extremely sex obsessed person
            You only get to choose one.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >You only get to choose one.
              I omitted the part that I'm asexual too, so since I don't experience sexual attraction I just don't get in heat constantly like other people, that's why I don't think of sex constantly, although I can be sexually aroused by both genders.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm asexual too

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The fact that you're already identifying yourself with two different sexual terms tells me all about how far removed you are from sexuality.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >I'm bisexual
            I'd have more respect for Black person lovers.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Literally a homosexual

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      giv Caska gf

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There are some who come here from /ic/ to be deranged, most other boards can see the merit of the tech for some given reason or another though

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There's more crying on BOT atm. I wonder why.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I was about to ask who made them to go support the artist...
    No you weren't. God I hate normies. Just say AI art sucks, why be moronicly dishonest like this?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      performative virtue signaling is the primary use of social media for these people, always has been

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why do they get butthurt over it if they can just use this ai-generated pics as a starting point for their own art

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      pls, they'd get lynched by their own peers if found out
      they already poisoned the well

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >even if you think something is beatiful, amazing, just perfect, it's HECKIN NOT OKAY!
    i hate modern copium npcs so bad bros

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You people are such scum. There will be a worldwide reckoning against AIshitters. You watch. It ain't gonna go well for you.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        calling out your hypocrisy is scummy now?
        best work on your arguments against AI art anon, because copying won't get you anywhere, not when that's the standard amongst non-ai artists

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >ain't
        stop appropriating my culture, artchud

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Pencuck
    Drawslave
    Paintpig
    Sketchog

    Does somebody have another term?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Arterrorists

      Check out r/LoveForAIArt lol you'll find some new ones

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >redditgay
        it all makes sense now
        i miss old BOT

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      "artist". it's now an insult in itself. AI generation is superior to what passes for art today.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >a-artists are not seething!

    Ok inkcel,if you could leave my NSFW models alone that would be great

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >leftie artists on social media: seize the means of production!!
    >ok we're seizing the means of producing art
    >leftie artists: NOOOO NOT LIKE THIS!! MY PATREON!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Reminds me of the """leftist""" """"sex workers""" that pop on twitter who seem to think that after the revolution comes doctors, fire fighters, farmers and construction workers should all work for free but they apparantly still deserve to be compensated for the grueling task of being photographed naked.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > don't buy it
    Huh?

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't get why artgays are so upset.
    Nobody is kicking their doors in, taking their pencils away.

    Plus, technology advancing is fascinating as frick. And this includes AI art.

    >but it's theft because AI learns by taking images!
    So? All artists copy each other and learn by redrawing what someone else has drawn before. And I put it to you, that AI is less noticeable than most artists out there in terms of copying and taking.

    I've never seen someone call out a piece of AI art by directly pointing at the image it took from. But that's happening constantly for regular art.
    The "theft" argument holds no water.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >So? All artists copy each other and learn by redrawing what someone else has drawn before
      Then you have no problem drawing your reaction image now, do you?

      I mean that's what an AI can do and then you can send that corpus to every single compatible client out there.
      >no I cannot draw it because machine learning and human learning is different, and I can't interpret an image like a perfect bytestream up my ass into an eidetic perfect memory and even if I have aquired the skill to recreate something similar I cannot transfer it and everyone has to start from scratch

      gee
      it's like you're getting it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Then you have no problem drawing your reaction image now, do you?
        Not OP but no we dont,it just takes alot of time

        Picking a career is like picking individual stocks in a stock market,artists just mad they picked the wrong one,also theyre not in a terrible predicament as they think they are in,thats like saying theres no point buying tech stocks because they already pumped

        Theyre just mad their skills arent distinct anymore

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's amusing how they kept telling normies to go creative due to ai and the first moment Skynet touchws themselves they go berzerk.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why is there such a backlash against AI generetaed images when we barely hear about AI Generated music ?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Give it time.
      >BEEP BOOP MY MIXTAPE IS FIRE ON SOUNDCLOUD BRUH

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Seethe more, AI troons.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ANTI AI ARTISTS ARE NAZIS

    I HAVE DECODED THEIR SECRET MESSAGE, GIF RELATED

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    KARLA ORTIZ IS A FRICKING COPYRIGHT NAZI

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    this whole anti artist campaign that suddenly came out of nowhere on BOT is funny because it gives BOT losers something to do and be a part of i guess even though there is war on actual artists. they just want so extremely desperately that there is because they bored in high school and don't have girlfriends lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      [Thoughtful argument that AI is not art theft and that AI art is real art]

      "W-well, you're an incel loser!"

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >incel being the main weapon
        Literal subzero-tier low test response

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This, if you want to wound a right winger you call him a cumskin or pretend to advocate child molestation.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >RIGHT WING LEFT WING
            undeveloped brain right here

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The funny thing is these same mouthbreathers were seething at NFTs a couple months ago while that is the perfect solution to this problem.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >NFTs a couple months ago while that is the perfect solution to this problem
      How so?

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI Chuds bullied Sarah Anderson

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So the comic book never lost copyright?

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >twitter screencap thread
    >imaginary drama thread
    KILL
    YOURSELF

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Remember that AI art has no copyright since it wasn't made by a human
    AI will literally usher in the liberation of humanity from the totalitarian copyright control that we have been living under for 100 years

    >Corporations can't use AI to make things because then they become public domain
    >The public can enjoy endless creativity and freedom

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >make thing with AI
      >just lie and say I made it
      >the point of AI is to be so good you can't prove that AI made it
      I'm planning on doing this from now on. Frick copyright but also frick anyone trying to stop me from doing things with AI.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Just use leftist projection and tell the human artists to stop ruining the art world with AI, while using AI yourself kek.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          How is leftism related to art?
          Honest question man

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Okay can you show yourself drawing another one?
        >Can you post the layers from when you made it?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >>Okay can you show yourself drawing another one?
          >>Can you post the layers from when you made it?
          I don't have to do shit to satisfy your curiosity, this isn't a court of law so frick off.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's on you to prove that you made it without AI for copyright purposes

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Categorically false. There is no such legal test.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Sure there is. I can challenge your copyright in court as illegitimate due to AI.
                You have to have a registered copyright on the work to enforce copyright claims, if you use AI, and I suspect as much and can verify it from anything, I can challenge this registration. This is where you will be forced to prove that you actually made the work, your previous works will be taken into account.

                Next time don't moron post about things that you don't know

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Sure there is. I can challenge your copyright in court as illegitimate due to AI.
                Go ahead and produce empirical evidence that it was made by AI then. Innocent until proven guilty, the party making a claim is responsible for backing up said claim.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Innocent until proven guilty
                This isn't a criminal case you fricking moron. "This man has no record of previous works, there is no way that he made this" is a legitimate reason that you will have to respond to

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Have fun paying for millions of your frivolous and child-tantrum lawsuits once the tech fully hits mainstream and everyone starts lying to your homosexual face and just saying they made their copyright work.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Have fun paying legal fees and fines (possibly even criminal charges) for filing illegitimate copyright registrations

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's funny that paint pigs like you think you're actually going to be able to stop this.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >stop it
                >not farm loud mouthed AI homosexuals for litigation money

                Enjoy uploading your epic prompt and getting shown that it detected the works of an artist and you can only continue your upload if you microtransaction a single upload license in the soon to be fully AI combed internet backbones a la cloudflare, while we artists can just upload our creations without hassle.

                All it will take will be a nominal fee to enter, like one can hire cloudflare, and every single major upload site will then make us money.

                I hope you got a proper job, future paypig.
                You'll need one.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The amount of cope in your post.
                There will be so many ways around that, like everything else on the internet. Not to mention even offline.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not the anon you are responding to, but wanted to say... That won't hold up too well in court bro.
                You'll need more than that.
                I've been in court for patent infringement before and they tried that argument and it went down fast.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >patent infringement
                Very different case. You might have figured out some simple mechanism on your own that someone else has patented. Anon has created an absolute masterpiece without any previous experience or published works, and he can't provide any information on the process (that all real artists would be able to show).

                It's funny that paint pigs like you think you're actually going to be able to stop this.

                Black person moron. No arguments, seethe more.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Anon has created an absolute masterpiece without any previous experience or published works, and he can't provide any information on the process (that all real artists would be able to show)
                So?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You have to be absolutely fricking delusional if you genuinely think I won't be able to get it investigated.
                You will be forced to prove that you actually made the work

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You have to be absolutely fricking delusional if you genuinely think I won't be able to get it investigated
                What the frick did you just fricking say about me, you little b***h? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the frick out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fricking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fricker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fricking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fricking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fricking dead, kiddo.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Suing you for copyright infringement rn. Shouldn't have posted that, kiddo

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Who cares if somebody "investigates" me? There's literally zero crime being committed. I generated it, the copyright belongs to me as I have created the original copy

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I generated it, the copyright belongs to me as I have created the original copy
                To add onto this, it's the exact same concept as if I took a photo of nature. It's my photo, so I own the copyright. The people that manufactured the camera (or phone) have absolutely zero stake regarding copyright for the photo that I took

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Filing copyright registrations on AI made works under your own name is fraud, it IS a crime.
                Either way. You are an absolute drooling buffoon who doesn't understand that CIVIL CASES.

                >I generated it, the copyright belongs to me as I have created the original copy
                To add onto this, it's the exact same concept as if I took a photo of nature. It's my photo, so I own the copyright. The people that manufactured the camera (or phone) have absolutely zero stake regarding copyright for the photo that I took

                No you fricking moron, it is not your photo, AI made that photo, and AI is not a person. There is no copyright on that picture. This has legal precedent already.
                Stop posting like a fricking moron when you have no idea what you are talking about.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it is not your photo, AI made that photo, and AI is not a person. There is no copyright on that picture
                In that case, I do not own the photos I take of nature using my camera, as explained in this post here:

                >I generated it, the copyright belongs to me as I have created the original copy
                To add onto this, it's the exact same concept as if I took a photo of nature. It's my photo, so I own the copyright. The people that manufactured the camera (or phone) have absolutely zero stake regarding copyright for the photo that I took

                However, you are incorrect on this.
                >This has legal precedent already
                Nope, you are wrong on this as well.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Nope, you are wrong on this as well
                https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/a-recent-entrance-to-paradise.pdf
                LITERALLY cannot be copyrighted.

                I change one pixel to add the human touch that makes it uniquely my work.
                oh no no no artsisters....

                Here he goes, moron posting again.
                For transformative works, you have to explicitly state what you transformed about the work when filing.
                A single pixel is unlikely to transform the work enough for you to be granted copyright.
                And even if it is, I get to know which pixel it is.

                >You have to be absolutely fricking delusional if you genuinely think I won't be able to get it investigated.
                >You will be forced to prove that you actually made the work
                this requires hundreds of thousands of dollars you inkcels don't have, nobody's gonna investigate shit for free

                moron moron can't you see, your drool is far too much for me.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >LITERALLY cannot be copyrighted
                Don't care, my image generation, my copyright. No crime is being committed, they have nothing on me. Those lawgays can seethe and cope all they like 🙂

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't care what you say! I'm too moronic to understand it anyways!
                Yep, exactly the response I expected.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I understand what they are getting at, but it literally doesn't matter what the lawgays think. It's up to them to provide proof, and even if they could somehow prove it, there are zero crimes being committed so the whole thing is irrelevant anyways
                Seethe and cope more, and then go back to r*ddit when you're done

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                fraud

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not fraud

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://www.vondranlegal.com/fraud-on-the-copyright-office
                >Works that are made by AI cannot be copyrighted
                >Therefore you lie about the authorship of the work
                >This is fraud
                Criminal fraud requires intent. Either way your copyright is thrown out

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Don't care, they can't prove anything. Trying to take down art generated by a computer (AI) is just like trying to take down art generated by a computer (digital camera). Their so-called "legal precedent" is faulty and illogical. As I said before, those lawgays along with you can seethe and cope as much as you want. It will never effect me.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not fraud

                Is it fraud if I take a nature photo with a camera and claim this image generated by a computer is mine? No.
                Is it fraud if I claim an image generated by a computer is mine? No.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Is it a crime to be moronic?
                It damn well should be

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I change one pixel to add the human touch that makes it uniquely my work.
                oh no no no artsisters....

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That 1 pixel make it have so much SOUL.
                Checkmate artgays.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                My prompt includes the word soul, so it already has that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Put that pixel back then, you ruined the soul.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You have to be absolutely fricking delusional if you genuinely think I won't be able to get it investigated.
                >You will be forced to prove that you actually made the work
                this requires hundreds of thousands of dollars you inkcels don't have, nobody's gonna investigate shit for free

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                per case as well. it's funny that paint pigs think they will have the resources and manpower to pull an IRL youtube copyright strike on tens of millions of cases once technology like SD goes fully mainstream and everyone starts submitting their own art for copyright

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                this is how most of them will end:
                >AI artist creates a bunch of cool new paintings and starts selling them
                >inkcel gets mad cuz AI artist "stole" his style
                >inkcel sends a DMCA notice
                >AI artist sends a counter-notice citing fair use
                >inkcel is fricked since his only option is to sue. he can't afford a lawyer because he makes $2 for every 10 hour painting and no lawyer will take a case against some random homosexual in an indian village on contingency

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Actually in my case, we had a patent applied for, pending & approved, and an actual product.
                Guy copied us at some point during its pending, and then tried to sue us later claiming infringement. Claiming there was no way we discovered a special safety breakaway wiring method.
                Courts were willing to listen, but as soon as he made that argument his case nosedived. We were later told even if there was no patent involved, we would have still won based on the fact the guy relied on the really poor argument that "they couldn't have done this because they haven't done it before"

                Not saying thats how it would exactly go down with AI in a court case, but theres a chance it would be very likely depending if its 2 literally-whos involved.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm pretty sure there's already legislation that says the prompter owns the copyright. Probably the same rules as other digital art since the ai in the eyes of the law will just be a piece of software like photoshop

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How exactly does AI stop artist from pursuing their passion? Should old ladies stop growing flowers and tomatos in their gardens just because both can be bought in every supermarket?
    If you're in art just for the money you are not an artist and you should go frick yourself.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >drawslave on literal suicide watch
      >"let's put watermarks everywhere so the AI hackers can't absorb them"

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Art "critic" channel that supports activists vandalizing Van Gogh joins the seething.

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What if you just said it's not AI art?

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why is there so much seething about AI art in particular when AI has already been slowly taking people's jobs for the past couple decades? there's never been this much outcry.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Don't worry about machines replacing labour, we'll just have more time and get more creative jobs instead!
      >Don't worry about machines replacing creativity, we'll just... uhhh....

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      not really, robots have taken over a lot of jobs but 'ai' has only just started to threaten industries.
      anyways there's a sea of angry 'artists' who are going to lose their commissions and patreons. the reason they're first on the chopping block is because they're so easily replaced that even fledgling machine learning (its not ai and their redefining of the term wont change my mind) can substitute them.

      i dont think 'real' artists will actually be impacted. the fine art community values human craftsmanship and scarcity, neither of which art created by machine learning provides. lead industrial desginers, concept artists, and the like will still exist because suits have no artistic talent, but these positions will likely replace their underlings with AI and use it to source mass concepts/inspiration before designing a final concept.

      tldr: real artists will be fine. sweatshop iterators and commission porn/furry artists will die

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        for now, atleast. good take anyway
        I wish we could entirely ignore all of those commissionists and talk about real artists instead

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >real artists will be fine. sweatshop iterators and commission porn/furry artists will die
        that makes sense, but you'd think there'd be less deranged screeching about it everywhere, then. there can't possibly be so many dogshit artists butthurt about it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >you'd think there'd be less deranged screeching about it everywhere, then. there can't possibly be so many dogshit artists butthurt about it.
          Let me tell you about a place called California.

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What prompts/edits do I have to make to an image produced via Stable Diffusion for it to be difficult to tell it's AI art?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      if you wanna replicate a character or create a realistic scene or something of that nature you're gonna have to keep fine tuning it until nothing looks off. if you wanna do shit like

      https://i.imgur.com/YC00rMr.jpg

      Absolute salt mine in the comments whenever something related to AI art is posted on normie social medias. Why are they like this

      there is pretty much no way to tell the difference.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >seething!! they're seething!!!!
    >*frothing at the mouth scream crying*
    >THE A-ARTISTS ARE SEETHING

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >The artists are seething! Haha
    >No, of course I haven't ever watched a movie/show/anime, listened to a story/song, looked at a painting/drawing/comic or enjoyed anything artistic in nature
    >Because I'm NOT AN ARTgay!! ARTgayS BE SEETHING! LOL!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      moron

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Use AI to make a vague idea of whatever you want to draw
    >Trace over it and add whatever details you want
    Why don't these artists see the potential of surpassing raw AI outputs? Thesid, Antithesis and Synthesis, right?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They're just worried about the future. It might stop being a tool and be a weapon instead.
      >weapon?
      Yes, we need to make sure AI will be 100% freedom of technology pilled, otherwise gayMAN will use it to gain a lot of control

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wanna start asking random inkcells what prompt they used.
    >Nice work there guy, this technology is getting more impressive every day
    So they start crucifying each other lol

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what's the best website to generate AI art to piss of inkcels?

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/musicians-wage-war-against-evil-robots-92702721/

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Interesting

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Tho’ the Robot can make no music of himself, he can and does arrest the efforts of those who can.
      the more things change, the more they stay the same

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    because art is heckin' sacred and if you charge too much/do nfts/work with AI you shall be ousted

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >hurr durr don't buy it
    I wasn't planning on it? I enjoy art for art's sake. It's not a commercial product for me. But please go on and tell me how your patreon is soul and AI art is soulless.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They think they'll have no customers anymore
      But meanwhile there's still people buying actual physical paintings online, they're paid for and delivered with delivery services
      I don't know how much, but there definitely still are

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI art has no so-
    *adds "soul" to prompt*
    Checkmate, atheists.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Atheists? Explain please

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Hello newhomosexual

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Another thread of AI pajeets chimping out because no one wants to redeem 1 girl huge breasts by Greg grutowsky.

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is only to get worse for artgays, I don't know why they keep b***hing.
    They should kneel before AI, and use it to their advantage.

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Frick these so called artists that seethe at AI.
    I went to art school in the late 2000s. Family was poor so it was go work in a sawmill for the rest of your life, or get a scholarship. Luckily I had a highschool art teacher that submitted my work behind my back and got me a free ride scholarship. And for that I'm ever grateful. Thank you Mrs. Evans.
    I studied classical pieces- Vinci, Bosch, Raphael, Reinhold etc as well as other genres. Studied composition and balance as well as light and color theory. I enjoyed it. I would seclude myself for hours at a time and just draw. It was peaceful.
    I posted in many a drawthread, provided free art for many a anon AVGD threads. Painted and sold some works and commissions.
    But in the end my professor took me aside and said he couldn't allow me to graduate because my portraits, landscapes, fantasy pieces lacked a "message". He wanted me to shill politics and i'm just to autistic to do it.
    Meanwhile the mulatto chick that had the artistic chops equivalent of a 7 year old graduates with honors because she can literally shove paint tubes up her ass and squirt paint out onto a canvas infront of a crowd and "that's real art, it makes a statement".
    Frick. These. Gay. Internet. "Artists".
    I'm glad they can see now how easily replaceable and meaningless they can be.
    I no longer partake in art. I graduated with a CIS degree with a minor in art. Probably for the better, I have a stable career I'm happy with.
    I miss art. And sometimes I think I might go back.. esp when I see the AI threads. AI art excites me at the possibilities. But I don't miss the pretentious people that are often associated with the art world. Frick them.
    I for one would dare say a real artist would embrace AI. Learn how to use it. It's a tool just like the paintbrush, you know.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but down the line it's not meant to be a tool anymore. It's advertised as an easy way for anyone to create something beautiful, not as a tool for artists.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >It's advertised as an easy way for anyone to create something beautiful, not as a tool for artists
        I see no problem with this.
        Same with game engines getting so much better that they are moron-proof. Sure we'll get a lot of garbage but it will also mean that creative people with high quality ideas and imagination but no programming skill will be able to create more/better games for me to play.
        The currency of the future when AI replaces all manual "skills" is destined to be in ideas. The people with the most creative and innovative brains will be the people who become successful as they will be able to use AI to automate and delegate all of the grunt work to manifest their ideas into reality. This is the way humanity always should have been, and thanks to AI it will finally happen.

      • 1 year ago
        Ricers gonna

        >It's advertised as an easy way for anyone to create something beautiful

        Hmmm
        We should ban pencils. They make it too easy to create art. You should be using charcoal sticks instead.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The pencil is a tool. The AI isn't. Wait until it's fully automated, instead of relying on prompts, and will be used for infinite automatic marketing, propaganda, whatever else, based on social media trends.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >wait until it's fully automated
            Are you saying that the AI will become sentient and also learn how to read minds?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Not happening, the AI's ultimate goal is computer vision, the text-to-image thing is used as a debugging tool.

          • 1 year ago
            Ricers gonna

            How is AI not a tool? Its does not just make images all by itself. It requires an input and then and only then does it produce an output. That is how tools work. They aid you in production.

            If it was fully automated to produce images on its own its still tool a tool because it requires maintenance and required input to create the original algorithms.

            Should we ban robots on assembly lines because they are too REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?

            • 1 year ago
              Ricers gonna
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Robots replaced human labour. Good.
              Now what's the benefit of robots replacing human creativity?
              Back when factory-workers went extinct, everyone just said "You'll have more free time and find a more creative job instead!"

              • 1 year ago
                Ricers gonna

                The question is how many people are willing to PAY for human creativity if a robot can do it equally or better?
                The answer will be very few. Similar to how people buy artisan cheese or wine yet mass produced version can be as good or better.
                moron lefty "artists" types are realizing very rapidly their worth is going to be zero in the next two years or so.

                No reason to gatekeep artistic images simply because "ohhh an AI created it so it sucks"
                Companies will not hesitate to use these.

                Wait until video images are produced at film quality with full sound at feature length. Film tards are going to cry just as bad

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't equate money earned to worth. Having an infinite amount of everything you'd ever think of, not surprisingly, decreases the value of everything there is.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Why shouldn't it be automated it allows people have have images they want pretty much instantly I love stable diffusion. I still support tonnes of artists on fanbox though because I like their work. My main issue with ai is people spamming sites like pixiv with their ai shit and filling up my feed with their generic pics that don't even have style consistency between their posts.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The homosexuals claiming this are the ones complaining now. Joe Brown supporting his family of 6 with a factory job sure as frick didn't want robots to replace his labor and it was objectively not a good thing for him. And since the "creative job" homosexuals were against him then, he is against them now when it's their jobs on the line.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Now what's the benefit of robots replacing human creativity?
                it doesn't
                figuring out what to draw is the creative part
                if you want to do something more abstract that requires drawing by hand, then you can always still do that, this software doesn't prevent any other kind of art being made

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            AI is as much of a tool as Photoshop, Krita, SAI, CSP, etc are.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's always going to have it's limitations tho.

        It's a stretch, but you can say the same for any modern art medium. I mean at one point you had to make your own pigment and paint. People reeee'd about digital art years ago, claiming it wasn't art- nor was a tablet a tool.

        I would make the claim that AI can be a tool. You learn how it works, tinker with it, input information for it to use. You get back images. Paint medium is a tool. You learn it's ins and outs of how it works, input the correct pigments and additives to get your desired medium. With it you also make images.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >wait until it's fully automated
          Are you saying that the AI will become sentient and also learn how to read minds?

          AI CAN be used as a tool, but doesn't HAVE to be. Someone putting in any effort or thought isn't a requirement.
          >are you saying the AI will become sentie...
          No, I'm saying that it'll be used to create an endless sea of automated, personalized, content, for the mindless consumers, without any humans behind it. Much like the social media recommendation algorithms we've got today, but instead of just recommending things, it creates everything you see for you.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >without any humans behind it. Much like the social media recommendation algorithms we've got today, but instead of just recommending things, it creates everything you see for you.
            Good, I see no problem with this. I get things I actually want, and am less dependent on other people as a bonus.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >No, I'm saying that it'll be used to create an endless sea of automated, personalized, content, for the mindless consumers, without any humans behind it. Much like the social media recommendation algorithms we've got today, but instead of just recommending things, it creates everything you see for you.
            So you'd be... prompting the AI for content?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              No prompting, it creates everything you want to see for you based on the data gathered on you, and the GLOBOhomosexual (tm) brainchip implanted into your head.

          • 1 year ago
            Ricers gonna

            >create an endless sea of automated, personalized, content, for the mindless consumers, without any humans behind it.

            Well of course that is going to happen. There is no stopping that and to be honest its already been happening.

            Every try calling a big company for tech support? Its either a mindless automated prompt machine or a mindless automated indian machine.

            AI will certainly cut out a lot of jobs. Until now "creative" jobs have been spared but these new tools will cut those jobs now too.

            People have been b***hing about robots taking their jobs since the printing press was invented.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You sound exactly like the morons that were opposed to photoshop, etc when digital art was becoming a thing.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not opposed to software that makes creating something easier.

              https://i.imgur.com/KFXMYXz.jpg

              >create an endless sea of automated, personalized, content, for the mindless consumers, without any humans behind it.

              Well of course that is going to happen. There is no stopping that and to be honest its already been happening.

              Every try calling a big company for tech support? Its either a mindless automated prompt machine or a mindless automated indian machine.

              AI will certainly cut out a lot of jobs. Until now "creative" jobs have been spared but these new tools will cut those jobs now too.

              People have been b***hing about robots taking their jobs since the printing press was invented.

              >without any humans behind it. Much like the social media recommendation algorithms we've got today, but instead of just recommending things, it creates everything you see for you.
              Good, I see no problem with this. I get things I actually want, and am less dependent on other people as a bonus.

              I AM however, opposed to universal basic income, eating the bugs, and owning nothing. No thank you.

              • 1 year ago
                Ricers gonna

                >I'm not opposed to software that makes creating something easier.

                This is literally what these AI art programs to but make it even easier.
                >Enter in some words you thought of
                >Outputs some images
                >Select one you like
                >???
                >Profit

                Art is the same way. 99% of artists work is not original ideas as its influenced by everything the person who made it has seen

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                in some words you thought of
                some images
                one you like
                >>???

                You sound like you're not capable of visualization.
                Let's say that I create some picture in my mind, now, how am I going to tell an AI to re-create it?
                AI simply isn't a tool.
                It's just a search engine where you enter a description and it gives you the average of all image results returned.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >99% of artists work is not original ideas as its influenced by everything the person who made it has seen
                Tell me, could a hunter-gatherer thousands of years ago, (so... he's only seen nature), could he think of the LOTR universe?
                Don't compare AI neural networks to human brains, you nihilist.

              • 1 year ago
                Ricers gonna

                >Tell me, could a hunter-gatherer thousands of years ago, (so... he's only seen nature), could he think of the LOTR universe?

                Thats my exact point. LoTR was written because thousands of other people before him wrote similar stories or snippets of stories. Just as the AI uses other images to refrence to create work. Artists use others work to create their work.

                in some words you thought of
                some images
                one you like
                >>???

                You sound like you're not capable of visualization.
                Let's say that I create some picture in my mind, now, how am I going to tell an AI to re-create it?
                AI simply isn't a tool.
                It's just a search engine where you enter a description and it gives you the average of all image results returned.

                >Let's say that I create some picture in my mind, now, how am I going to tell an AI to re-create it?

                Yes? Some people dont have the skills to create what they can visualize hence photoshop etc

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Thats my exact point. LoTR was written because thousands of other people before him wrote similar stories or snippets of stories. Just as the AI uses other images to refrence to create work. Artists use others work to create their work.
                That's true, and every artists contribution adds something on to it, the sum is greater than its parts. And yes, artists use others work to create their work, but I still wouldn't compare that to the way an AI works, they're still pretty different. It's not done in the same way.
                >Yes? Some people dont have the skills to create what they can visualize hence photoshop etc
                Drawing something on photoshop is the same as drawing something on paper. You can't "draw" using an AI.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This has me thinking about a thousand years from now- after LOTR is forgotten.. but someone will write something very vaguely similar- but everyone will be gay and black (because in 3023, that will be considered "oldworld" archtypes that don't exist in teh year 3000)
                And everyone will think its fresh and new, and nobody remembers LOTR...

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Goyslop will still be goyslop regardless of if its human made or AI made, and you will get fed it through the same medium as you do today. And the methods of ignoring it will be the same as it is today. The biggest appeal is that you can run local instances where you decide what the AI creates. You are the artist.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >You can run local instances
              Until you cant, because one individual may run an AI he has, but he cannot train it. So gayMAN will be in control of AI in the end.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You can train existing models at home

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >but he cannot train it
                Finetunes currently cost about $100 or so in computing costs. That's why there are so many models these days. And lesser techniques can be easily done in a regular consumer GPU.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How old are you? We have a dozen different community models for SD right now. There is a new version that is going to BTFO the corporate model being trained RIGHT NOW.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm happy to hear that, then.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You also forgot to take into account that hardware will keep advancing and in some number of years you could spend $100 for a GPU that can train a model in a day. This is only going to get easier and easier for normal people to get their hands on to use offline.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's good, my biggest concern with AI isn't the morality or whatever, but freedom of technology.
                If it's open and free for everyone to use, for whatever purpose, then that means a single individual can create something as great as an entire company. It's like what happened with gamedev where you've just got a lot of indie games that get sometimes as much attention as AAA games, because the software allows them to.

  66. 1 year ago
    Ricers gonna

    95% of these "artists" are using a digital pad that relies on all sorts of computer algorithms to create lines or colours etc
    They then go in and photoshop every single thing they post online which again is using AI(Algorithms) to create certain effects.

    Lastly someone had to program this AI to generate images in certain ways. That art of this is from the code being written to display the pictures. Humans still have to input phrases and filter out results that suck.

    TL:DR its just a new method to create art

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Only bad artists are afraid of AI art.

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Unfriendly reminder that AI art is not transformative.

    >yes it is
    No it's not, and neither is making music with samples from other songs/movies/etc.
    That is also not considered transformative.

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ARTISTS ARE SEETHING
    no one knew they were seething and raging until you ai morons starting desperately saying they were day in day out non stop, you're the only ones saying it lol. really makes you think that this is yet another BOT psyop
    >BUT TWITTER SAID
    twitter is not a representation of reality, sorry but you live in a bubble
    >BUT REDDIT SAID
    reddit is not a representation of reality, sorry but you live in a bubble

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >"I personally don't like AI art"
    >WOW LOOK AT THESE SEETHING ARTISTS, THEY'RE ALL SO MAD, LOOK AT THEM SEETHE, THEY'RE COMPLETELY BESIDE THEMSELVES WITH ANGER, LOOK AT THEM SEETHE, THEY'RE COMPLETELY SEETHING, THEY'RE LITERALLY SHAKING WITH RAGE, LOOK AT HOW VISIBLY UPSET THESE PEOPLE ARE, THEY ARE QUITE LITERALLY SEETHING WITH RAGE, LOOK AT THESE SEETHING ARTISTS
    No one is fricking "seething" you autist, look at how little emotion is in this screencap

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Have you see some of the homosexuals in this thread?
      Def some seething going on for sure.

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Don't worry about machines replacing labour, we'll just have more time and get more creative jobs instead!
    >Don't worry about machines replacing creativity, we'll just... uhhh....

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      we'll just be sex slaves when the new order takes over humanity

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >>Don't worry about machines replacing labour, we'll just have more time and get more creative jobs instead!
      The people saying this are the same ones who mocked blue collar workers for losing their jobs like liberal arts homosexuals are being mocked now.
      "Then they came for me, and there was nobody left to speak up on my behalf."
      You burned all of your bridges, nobody will defend you now.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Note that I didn't mention liberals
        Why do you associate liberalism with creativity

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I will simply assume that the person I'm stealing from is too poor to defend their rights
    You know they can file literally for free if they can't fund the suit, right?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this will go one of two ways:
      >moron represents himself in court
      >case goes nowhere because AI artist isn't in the country
      or
      >moron represents himself in court
      >moron gets btfoed and is forced to pay defendant's lawyer fees because he's moronic enough to think he can go up against someone who can afford a lawyer
      and yes, you can be forced to pay defendant's attorney fees in a copyright suit. better paint harder piggy, gotta pay off your debts to your AI artist master

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hey inkcels, I'll cut you a deal out of pity, to humor you. I'll give you cheap commissions to create images that will help train a better AI model. That's the only way you're getting money now.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'll be paying them $0.50/hr to fix the hands on my anime booba coomer collection

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        why not just inpaint yourself?

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >make nsfw guro furry AI art
    >say I made it
    >sell it
    >nobody knows the wiser
    >meanwhile some dumb furgay artist is spending his entire day everyday drawing it
    Its like an unlimited money chest code

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      nobody should need to pay anymore because everybody can run the AI offline on their own computer to get what they want without needing other people
      reducing dependence on other people is correlated with an increase in personal liberty

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes but you underestimate just how dumb people are. There will always people be paying for something like this that they can do themselves for free

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      honestly, even if it's technically in the public domain, you can make a trivial half-assed edit to it just to cover the "modicum of creativity" clause making it legally your copyrighted work.

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    in fact it's stunning that artgays have such little self awareness that even now they STILL insist that it's a good thing that the "low skill" people's jobs were replaced by robots, and expect anyone to have any sympathy for their jobs being replaced now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this. inkcels get absolutely no sympathy from me because of how arrogant and holier-than-thou they are. yes, I will use the stable diffusion. I will train the hypernetwork on your scribbles purely out of spite. I will continue to report bugs and help others get SD up and running on their machines. and yes, I will be happy when your smug asses die of starvation

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i lost my job from automation and the "elite" like artists said it was a good thing, so I think it's a good thing that they lose their jobs to automation as well.

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    /b/ has better AI threads
    they just post shit they make and people ask about how to make them
    no complaining, just cool AI art

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *