No they don't, you make art because you like it, if you're good you can make money. These shitheads just want money for their furry porn and are butt blasted that an ai can make their shotty art better and faster. Get a real job you greedy limp wristed garden gnomes
>MuH SkYnEt
anon true AI like skynet is decades away at best. The much more immediate threat is the demographic/ethnic genocide garden gnomes are running in a coordinated manner in every white country they hold power in against whites, and the brown invaders they're bringing in. It's going to be real hard for whites to team up to throw down on a good moral crusade when all our countries are getting flooded at the same time.
I’ll give you three names of contemporary fine artists. You tell me if they are genuine painters or Ai. Zin Lim, Solly Smook, frederico Infante. All three are very popular contemporary painters. I enjoyed their work, until I saw the Ai in it.
They have a point, imagine how much more soulless everything would be if it was generated by an AI.
If you think the movies, tv and music are shit now just wait until you go into a grocery store and hear Micheal Jackson singing Ed Sheeran covers, you look for the non goyslop section and the only thing you can find is a can of pineapple slices that has an image of a pineapple morphed into the shape of a she-moron's shaking ass on it.
They don't have a point, these garden gnome lgbt artists have no fucking soul
With the AI you can make your own media that is so much better, I can ask it for tits painted by vincent van gogh, what could be better?
Because you can't ask for anything new.
AI only takes what exists, homogenizes it, and then spits it back out to you in a pseudo intelligible way.
It relies on existing jokes, essays, artwork, etc. Its brainless iteration worse than any Hollywood pandering or idiotic liberals.
this is like saying you can't write anything new because you're just using words that exist. you don't understand the tech which is fine; it's complicated and convoluted but it definitely creates new art. have a free ai waifu
No cumbrain the tech is easy to understand. It's a searchable interpolation using stolen art A between stolen art B times a million and that's why there's a class action lawsuit over it. You stupid gay.
Not at all. Individual words don't have an inherent structure.
Every word has a meaning, but not a larger construction attached. Shakespeare and Joyce both had the same words, but took them in totally different directions. There was individual creativity, newness.
AI's are trained in already structured media. They aren't trained on individual lines, blotches of color, shapes. The building blocks of visual artwork. The individual words.
They're trained on completed artworks. They can only work to replicate what completed artworks they were trained on as well. In your case drawings of cartoon women with fat tits. And that AI can only make more of that.
It can't make something new, something different than whatever sum of the material it was 'fed' on homogenizes into.
You can 'feed' an AI Shakespeare until it can spit out plays that word for word sound just like the Bard. Perhaps even one day it could even do that and maintain a coherent plot. But it could never do something other than that.
It could never create a new style for it.
It can only vomit out a nutrient paste version of Shakespeare.
Humans take in and then iterate.
Even the most creatively bankrupt of teenage deviantart artists add something new to whatever mall goth mix they spit out.
AI doesn't iterate in the slightest. Only combines and interpolates and combines and interpolates. There is not change or development addition of any new elements.
>They have a point, imagine how much more soulless everything would be if it was generated by an AI
They don't have a point, though. Everything is soulless as fuck already and set to be even more soulless, with or without AI. Not to mention, everything is so fucking focus-tested and devoid of human personality, it might as well be AI anyways. Except AI can actually give you shit you want sometimes
Wrong this just means the common man, the more logical and utilitarian people (us) can create our own media and spread our ideas by making them beautiful instead of some chud or art slut spreading her shitty ideas with pretty pictures.
Currently working on my own web comic series with AI so far it's looking pretty good and I'm just drawing over the ai work and touching it up.
Our era is only starting bros, we need to start rising up and over produce over do and essentially beat them, they're weak as shit right as they're all worthless, people who have emotional break downs over the simplest things
The only one worthless is you, look at this shit you put out with ai. It looks like such trash I hope you're being sarcastic. You arent improving yourself and you never will you are being a tracing weak gay baby because hardwork is too hard wahhh. Literally all ai sloppers produce is quantity of SHIT over quality you are even satisfied with obvious flaws and think it 'passes', deroof yourself chud
what do you think the great reset is the 4th industrial revoltion is AI and automations all the useless eaters with be culled and the rest will live in pods and eat bugs.
That's racist and anti semetic my friend, these poor people from the 3rd world need our help.
All they have to do is to just implement a captcha for viewing their art so the AI cannot access it. Or ban IPs that open/download their images en masse. That way the AI cannot copy them.
HAHHAHAHAA >He doesn't know about the BOT Captcha AI solver
>How many of these artists were silent about immigration taking working class jobs?
What exactly have you done about immigration taking working class jobs?
>How many of these artists were silent about immigration taking working class jobs?
Implying any of these gays have ever made a dime selling their "art" to begin with.
All they have to do is to just implement a captcha for viewing their art so the AI cannot access it. Or ban IPs that open/download their images en masse. That way the AI cannot copy them.
You computer illiterate fuck, I hope you realize a simple web scraper would solve that issue.
Computers can virtually do anything.
IF YOU REALLY WANNA STOP IT Don't FUCKING POST IT ON THE INTERNET
How long till I can have my own ai onlyfan models, that I train with photos and then use macros to run the various commands, which I then post weekly updates of
You can do that already, if training data is sufficient then you can pretty much train a decent model to spit out anything. Some furgay on reddit trained one on the entirety of e621 and furafinnity and has been using it to spit out furry porn, the furry porn is indistinguishable to normal furry porn. I cant post it, don't feel like getting banned again, but you'll find it if you try.
What your seeing now is just what's avaliable to the general public for free, consumer grade ai used by companies has been at this level for awhile. Imagine the stuff the government has behind closed doors.
Worse scenario: Companies pretend that your hand made art work or typewritten story has a duplicate in their AI server and they sue you for copyright infringement.
I sure would like to pick through those, look for the pairs with the blackish yellowish female foot prints. I want to get the ones that have the imprints and the tangy essence. Imagine licking them and shoving the end of them in your mouth. I'd have my bag ready just like im shopping at the thrift store, for the tastiest dirtiest pair. Oy vey.
You should have a major problem with the past 100 years then.
Given that many lives, and indeed entire civilizations, have been destroyed on the basis of fake crimes.
>used to create fake images of crime "victims" that don't exist. >could be
This has happened like three times already, each with extensive 4chan coverage. If you aren't aware, you deserve it.
Welcome to the post-truth world.
I'm old enough to remember the advent of MP3s and the music industry reaction. There's no hope fighting it, but something eventually did come along as a substitute: dj culture. From dj culture, lots of new musicians made their fortunes years after the supposed death of the music industry. Anyone who is interested in making art needs to keep an eye out for whatever the next thing in art turns out to be. There will be something that comes along with the sea change, and the people who fight the sea change always end up drowning. You need to ride the next wave, as it were.
This. The creative printing process makes it art. Andy Warhol had others do his silkscreening. Jeff Koons never touches his own work, Ai Weiwei either. Even that black guy that did the Obama portrait with all the sperm in the garden pays a factory full of chinese to paint the paintings.
In what way are they comparable?
MP3s were 'bad' because they allowed for the easy copying and redistribution of music. It was bad for the industry because it made piracy trivial. It wasn't bad for the artwork of music making.
AI generated music on the other hand is bad for music as an artform in of itself.
I think that AI Art is an overall positive because A) People who want quick and cheap art can get it, and B) it will force self proclaimed artists to step up their efforts, separating the wheat from the chaff.
I know there is a solid chance that the antigay had his friends do that to him and this is a wachadoinrabbi moment, but if a wignat actually did do that then lmao based.
>Digital art isn't art, it's just random pixels arranged in a pleasing manner.
Painting isn't art it's just splotches of pigment arranged in a pleasing manner.
how about they piss off? people raged when threshing machines and automatic looms and automobiles were introduced and it didn't help them at all. And those were useful people! Now, the rage of these people? Why would anyone care about it?
The vast majority of them are uncreative, leeching hacks that are likely pozzed lefties too. I've seen better art being shared that was generated by AI than any of the bullshit these hacks make.
They didn't stop digital art when it was becoming a thing, they didn't stop various shortcuts that are currently being utilized that kill actual skill. Why cry now? I'm not even particularly passionate about AI art but they can't stop it and won't beable to.
Good, a properly trained coombait AI will make better porn than most of the autistic talentless retards currently making R34/fanart could ever hope to make.
This. What they’re mad about is that genuine western figurative art is what Ai is bringing back, making their eyeslop look like what it is, eyeslop.
This anon is spot on. It's artslop "artists" bitching that AI is bringing back western hyperrealism and forcing them to learn actual skill to compete instead of being able to just make do putting out low quality trash by the barrel.
>degenerates tend to have the deepest wallets
thinking through the root cause of this is horrifying, but it explains other current events, like colonel buttfucker and his mutt brigade
>lol fuck you racist sexist homophobic working class scum I can't wait for automation to take your job so you can starve in the gutter >noooooo AI wasn't supposed to replace my job
Pottery.
No actual artist would give a shit. An artist has an oeuvres, a style characterized by unique elements in a sea of otherwise sameness. This is something an AI can’t replicate. Among many other things. Any artist worried about this makes images in photoshop for clickbait ads and top 25 lists. Nothing of value to lose. An uninspired artist is not an artist.
It's incredible how fast they have surrendered.
If their art is worse than the generic shit the AI's are throwing, they shouldn't call themselves artists.
Ai is a tool just like their patches, filter and just grabbing a bunch of images and call it art like they do right now, they just haven't realized how to use it properly and they're crying about it
His misconception of the AI being the artist leads him to believe the artistic intent must come from the AI itself, rather than AI being a tool which assists in realizing the artistic intent of the user.
>let me guess, you think there's some sort of uniquely human "spark" which an ai can't possibly recreate
Not necessarily but humans have drive and an AI does not nor cannot replicate that.
Thinking of “the ai” as the artist is completely the wrong approach and the same mistake these art gays are making. The software is akin to a camera, a brush, photoshop, whatever abstraction you like, that it still requires a person controlling it. It’s just another tool.
The entire leap forward in the Renaissance was due to a camera obscura. A mirror that projected a hologram from a model or still life onto the canvas.
5 months ago
Anonymous
And clever artists will similarly be able to leverage ai software into their work, I’m sure. It’s only these mid hacks that are complaining, if people haven’t noticed. Your typical “I read the how to draw manga book and now charge $50 per commission” types.
5 months ago
Anonymous
The smart money would learn how to encaustic the print to give it depth and texture.
Holy fuck I’ve heard this one before. For everyone who works behind the scenes
With a spirit you can't replace with no machine.
-Alabama
Singing about mechanization replacing factory workers. Turns out nobody cares about your “spirit”.
That's called a master study you knuckle dragging retard. It's a common exercise that artists do wherein they try to replicate what the classical masters produced in order to learn their technique. The goal isn't to repackage the same work an art that some else did. The goal is to learn and better yourself so you can apply the technique to your own original art.
>I don't know how to argue against this because I'm talking out of my ass and I don't understand art and it scares me
typical leaf comment
moron that is exactly what the AI does. it has zero capacity to remember its training data, it just remembers concepts and abstractions (e.g. what makes a car a car) and makes 100% original art. if anything, AI-generated art is more original than human art, because humans, regardless of intention, subconsciously copy that which they've seen before, while AI synthesizes everything out of random noise.
AI art can literally not exists from preexisting art from human artists to generate from. And all it is doing is copying all the way down to generating the same signature that a well known artist uses to sign their work. It has every ability to remember it's training data, that's why it went from uncanny abstractions with too many fingers to reproducing the styles of well known artists just by adding their name to the keywords >AI-generated art is more original than human art, because humans, regardless of intention, subconsciously copy that which they've seen before, while AI synthesizes everything out of random noise.
holy fuck you are so goddamn stupid it is beyond words. Is spongebob fucking squarepants something someone saw before irl? What does that even mean? Have you ever seen artwork before?
Sorry bucko, calling me a leaf isn't an argument. >AI art can literally not exists from preexisting art from human artists to generate from
True for all art. Next. >And all it is doing is copying all the way down to generating the same signature
Wrong. Don't talk about things you don't understand okay? It makes you look like a goofy man.
moron that is exactly what the AI does. it has zero capacity to remember its training data, it just remembers concepts and abstractions (e.g. what makes a car a car) and makes 100% original art. if anything, AI-generated art is more original than human art, because humans, regardless of intention, subconsciously copy that which they've seen before, while AI synthesizes everything out of random noise.
You are fucking retards, master studies arent ever posted online as new pieces of art. Do you know what standing on the shoulders of giants even means? It means you learn from the best. rancid ass morons will never understand this concept of actual progression over plagiarism. Human made art is celebration of expression, Ai made art is destruction of real expression and letting someone else take the wheel because wahh its too hard to learn how yourself with master studies and youre too selfish to pay someone else. have a nice day.
these are incels who have 0 talent and drive to achieve something. These little garden gnome like people glee at the thought of being able to use a tool to generate good looking art. It makes them feel better about themselves
It's every day people who discovered a medium which allows them to explore their creativity that wasn't possible before the Ai, you artgays are completely embittered because for one the Ai essentially bypasses your paywalls and secondly the Ai enables anybody to draft a visual representation from their concept without relying on a middle man to bring their idea on a canvas. I've been drinking artist tears for the past six months and it is insatiable.
5 months ago
Anonymous
> It's every day people who discovered a medium which allows them to explore their creativity that wasn't possible before the Ai,
it means non artist, people with 0 drive to practice anything, people like you being able to pass as artist now. Don't you see the it cheapens the concept of being an artist ? everyone can grab a couple images, tell the AI to redraw it in a specific style and that's it.
No longer you need to spend years honing your craft. it's instantaneous, cheap and worthless
You are the definition of npc globohomo happy that your kind can now generate their little images without having to become a real artist.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Did you just plagiarize craftsman from the past 200 years? That’s exactly what potters, cobblers, blacksmiths, carpenters, weavers, etc. Have been saying for quite a while.
5 months ago
Anonymous
moron, I've been drawing way before Ai came along. The only people who are pissing and moaning are those like you who do not enjoy the process behind drawing from imagination and watching your ideas come to fruition by your own hand. The Ai merely supplements that ability.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>The Ai merely supplements that ability.
you are dumb my man, in 5 years you will have software able create any sort of scene, with any type of character and style.
go to any art board and you will notice tons of new accounts with amazing realistic art. This is just the beginning.
AI cheapens art and dumb fucks like you don't see where we are heading where losers drawing by hand like you will be competing against non artist now.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>AI cheapens art
Only if you suck.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I'm all for real humans doing real art but I guarantee you that a dude with 2 month of experience using AI prompts will crush a real artist in a real competition. It already happened, it won against real artists and people got mad when they found out it was AI.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I’m killing it selling Ai art. I was doing well as an oil painter, but now I have zero dry time.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>selling ai
No wonder you're such a braindead shill for quantity over quality. have a nice day you're a complete failure of a human, you've just reduced yourself to a goyslop factory. You're so fucking worthless you gave up being a real artist and threw in the towel
5 months ago
Anonymous
I sell work at solo shows. I’m a real artist. Now I’ve raised my output exponentially and decimated my overhead.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>I’m a real artist.
No you're not, you're a fraud and a piece of shit. and you had the Gaul to call someone else a garden gnome while you make money only possible off stolen artwork.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>literally crying
5 months ago
Anonymous
Any self respecting artist won't touch ai, no prompt will ever come out like the same as what you can think of in your head. There's there'es no satisfaction in using img2img when it ends up completely different from your original in nearly every way.
you will never be an artist
5 months ago
Anonymous
AI can and does come up with associations between ideas beyond the parsimony of the human mind.
5 months ago
Anonymous
You’re dead wrong. Most successful artists don’t even touch their own work. I got my start ghost painting for big names. Museum artists.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Most successful artists don’t even touch their own work
Literal retards are the ones advocating for ai art, good to know. >I got my start ghost painting for big names. Museum artists.
Nice LARP gay
5 months ago
Anonymous
>knows nothing about anything. Keeps posting.
5 months ago
Anonymous
"competitions" are meaningless. This is the same with programming. Applications aren't the same as Leet Code tests. Just getting AI to generate some random pretty looking thing doesn't mean anything.
5 months ago
Anonymous
go and do research pieces of AI art winning in terms of composition, anatomy, shading. don't be an ignorant fuck and start throwing opinions without doing previous research
if gold was inherently valuable, countries producing it wouldn't be poor shitholes
gold's value is derived from gnomish economic system which ironically cheapens its actual value by preventing its widespread usage in electronics and architecture
Quick google search:
Unlike the many other metals found around the globe, gold has held and retained a high status because of three specific properties: scarcity, durability, and malleability.
Gold is valuable because you cannot find it below the ground easily without needing expensive machinery to extract and refine it you tard.t
5 months ago
Anonymous
I have already seen this thing. You still aren't addressing anything here. It is a "competition". The only goal is to "look pretty". There is no AI art that can for example go and draw the feelings of somebody at an event that was not captured in photo somewhere on the internet.
5 months ago
Anonymous
you are literally too retarded to have this conversation
You know whats a metal thats rarer than gold? Platinum
Now go look up how much platinum costs per ounce compared to gold.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>generate some random pretty looking thing
that's all that 'art' ever was.
5 months ago
Anonymous
art has to cost something from the creator to exist.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Prints aren’t cheap. Neither is framing.
5 months ago
Anonymous
and the frame job would be art, yes.
the color values produced by the ai and their locations would not be.
5 months ago
Anonymous
lol, you can't even pass the logic test because you are all brainless hyper driven zoomer NPCs.
How can software CREATE art. Have you heard the saying (probably not) that a picture paints a THOUSAND words? All of these AI things, if they were to actually produce good art, would require you to write an entire book of [prompts] to actually draw a real painting, and it would defeat the point as it would be better to just get somebody to draw it.
5 months ago
Anonymous
You have no idea what it’s capable of now.
5 months ago
Anonymous
you think too highly of yourself but you are really low iq
who the fuck is talking about creating. It will use the entirety of the internet to produce art ?
> All of these AI things, if they were to actually produce good art, would require you to write an entire book of [prompts] to actually draw a real painting, and it would defeat the point as it would be better to just get somebody to draw it.
have you been living under a rock (you probably are you little incel). Go to art boards and you will see amazing AI art and sometimes their prompts. people are sharing prompts now as a start to their creations.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Definitely a gnomish abstract expressionist who makes a mess on a canvas and talks for an hour about xer’s inspiration.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Nope. I am a genius and you still don't get it. You can't create artwork with a "prompt" of a few words. The idea of art is to capture certain things that a person wants. If all a person wants can be captured in a few words, it is a google search of existing stuff merged together, it isn't creating art.
If you are creating art, you are thinking about every single thing in the picture. That means many thousands of millions of prompts. "what colour should the reflection on the person's head be" blah blah.
5 months ago
Anonymous
All the more reason to draw inspiration from Ai related works, I have seen amazing illustrations that were combined from the different styles and rendering methods from a mixture of other artists compiled together in a visual piece that was otherwise not possible without a tool like the Ai. We are embarking on a new era where we may see masters of old once again paint on canvas through the Ai at the leisure of a prompter, this is amazing technology and it really is a shame that you fail to comprehend the possibilities Ai will deliver.
5 months ago
Anonymous
handcrafted well done art would still be appreciated, what a daft take. AI art is already hundreds of times more soulful than original hand done globohomo art. You don't even understand what the tech is doing, it doesn't mishmash art together and that is a fuckin brainlet retard take of how it works. You may as well make the exact same shit claim about humans learning to create art, mishmashing what they've learned, and it would also be as wrong.
moron that is exactly what the AI does. it has zero capacity to remember its training data, it just remembers concepts and abstractions (e.g. what makes a car a car) and makes 100% original art. if anything, AI-generated art is more original than human art, because humans, regardless of intention, subconsciously copy that which they've seen before, while AI synthesizes everything out of random noise.
>AI does the same thing that takes days maybe weeks in mere seconds >Artgays seethe and cope because all their time learning strokes was outdone by a machine
LOL
Fun fact. The real AI art fun hasn't even started yet. Wait until it gets to version 4 and starts to do abstract stuff on its own
Someone replicating a painting either as an exercise or as a means of creating more examples of it for storage or durability is entirely different than an AI making a mystery meat blend of art work and autogenerating new variants of what already exists.
One is clear copying. Its mechanical replication and everyone involved knows it. The latter is false creativity. Taking what other people have done, blending it into a fine paste, and then spinning off an infinite number of variants. It pretends to make new things.
It's not because they are afraid of AI taking over their job/careers. Its that its a complete game changer in how one can approach art. Artists here have so much of their identity wrapped up in being "an artists" this is an existential to that identity. You spend so much time honing your craft only for a machine to do it faster and maybe arguably better (?) but not actually taking advantage of any of the tools given to you. The real irony is, it was Artists who originally created so much of the tech/tools that AI like stable diffusion and Dall-e uses like LAION 5b.
It kinda like how the Swiss had their national identity into making watches to the point that no-one else held a candle to them. Then game the Japs with their quartz movements that not only were cheaper to manufacture but also had significantly orders of magnitude better accuracy. Just like AI the quartz tech was something they invented.
They used the same arguments how, quartz movments have no soul, killing the craft etc, etc,
>mfw artgays shriek MUH COPYRIGHT because they think AI art is cut and pasted like a collage instead of a drawing created from abstracted elements/traits/techniques common to the images on which the AI was trained
>Artists who charge 100 dollars for halfway decent art of copyrighted characters screeching that they are being stolen from
I've already determined that if anything happens to AI art then my goal in life will be reporting overpriced commissions to their copyright holders and watching the artist seethe
Imagine calling yourself an artist when you need thousands upon thousands of dollars in computer equipment and a variety of programs full of smoothing and rendering algorithms just to make some weeb fan art and yet you couldn't do a damn thing with just a pencil and paper
Imagine thinking that your manual input is somehow what makes your digital art somehow more authentic than an AI's digital art
Digital art is trash and now it's outdated too
Thousands of dollars of PC equipment? my CPU costs $40 on eBay and my GPU $90.
So you're saying you spent a bunch of money to have a computer simulate something you could have learned to do for free with a pencil just so you can convince yourself that you have developed skills which you actually haven't developed in real life?
sounds right
I support AI art. I don't support wacom jockies who know so little about computers they don't understand they already are using AI when they use their art programs and tablets and shit. I'm enjoying watching them seethe
Seeing how the AI fart huffers on /b/ act, I understand why it's getting banned, these prompt monkeys are full of themselves, it really got to their heads.
Its a bunch of gays being proud they can wear the "artist" badge, despite never putting in the work. Its similar to the twitter trannies that pretend to fight for something, or climate activists that pretend to be brave.
Its all hollow, but i hope the protest actually fucks it up permanently
>aha, we've done it reddit! >destroys all the crappy online ones >does absolutely nothing to shit like SD
So they ruined it for all the retards, and not for the actual intelligent people? this won't backfire.
these artists use other works as examples and straight up use real photos as a base to their art.
then they wanna complain because a computer is doing the same thing, but faster?
these are all the hype driven stupid statements. HUMANS ARE OBSOLETE
meanwhile, FSD can't drive for more than 30 seconds without crashing. You are all being fed hype and have no brains of your own to think about or assess the real ability of AI.
>From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine. Your kind cling to your flesh as if it will not decay and fail you. One day, the crude biomass that you call a temple will wither, and you will beg my kind to save you. But I am already saved. For the machine is immortal.
>anyone can be an artist now.
you know what that means ?
What's worth more to humans, a pound of Gold or a pound of Aluminium ? Answer: Gold. gold is a precious metal that is hard to find and refine.
art is becoming worthless now. You can get a billion variations now and they are all worthless since they can be generated without needing human input and by anyone. The only ones supporting AI art are coomers, untalented fucks who never made an effort to become something, and gay artists who will secretly use AI to make their paintings "better" because they knew they weren't that good with begin with.
The value of something is tied to how laborious is it to produce it.
untalented hack happy that we are replacing humans, who is the garden gnome here garden gnome boy ?
No one except for a real garden gnome would be happy that now anyone can be an "artist", anyone can be a "coder" that anyone can be anything which means humans become worthless.
Why spend 10 years learning guitar or piano or mastering painting and colors if a computer can do produce "better" by stealing, mixing and matching.
In the future people are going to be even worthless
it's the future you chose you little untalented fat fucks
5 months ago
Anonymous
You probably spill your “period” blood from your fetid axewound of a front hole, think about your feelings and call it art. Like a garden gnome would.
>What's worth more to humans, a pound of Gold or a pound of Aluminium
Aluminium >Answer: Gold. gold is a precious metal that is hard to find and refine.
garden gnome rotted brain
theres a reason why ghana is trading gold for oil
if gold was inherently valuable, countries producing it wouldn't be poor shitholes
gold's value is derived from gnomish economic system which ironically cheapens its actual value by preventing its widespread usage in electronics and architecture
>anyone can be an artist now
Remember when everyone became able to use the internet and there was no gatekeeping anymore?
Remember when tiktok made everyone a video creator?
Half the reason actual art is often soulless to begin with is because artist cater to normies and the worst stuff is promoted the most by them. AI is just there to create even more goyslop.
Drawing had basically no real barrier of entry to begin with. We've been drawing even since we've been cavemen, you can put crayons into the hands of a child. What's actually been stopping people is laziness and lack of interest and passion in the subject. So all it's doing is inviting the most apathetic people possible to the medium and expecting them to create something of value. People who actually care about painting don't wanna give up control for some quick results and will keep painting manually unless pressured by monetary incentives.
one of the best post in this shitty thread.
Everything goes to shit when normal people with no talent or drive have access to previously hard to access fields
it happened with the internet, it used to be a lot more interesting back then.
it happened with games, video games were a lot more thoughtful before anyone could play on their phones, now games are peak globohomo propaganda
it happened with music, you needed talent to do anything. Now any zoomer gay is a famous musician, you just need a couple face tats and some rapping over an FL studio track.
it happened with video, and so on
The AI is the great filter thats gonna separate the wheat from the chaff. Souless "artists", pretentions retards who does nothing but makes images alteration, plastified shit with PS brushes set and call it a piece gonna have to rethink what they are doing. AI is also a great tool for people with real skills whos gonna broad their possibilities and increase their productivity since you can use it as a source for inspiration and reference. I dont know why those fucks are crying out loud, this is something ive been dreaming about for years because i work with this kind of thing and these narrowed brains jumped the whiny train without even consider thats a blessed in disguise.
Also; this is a piece made by Hiroshi penguin joe. The amount of soul in his works are palpable and doesnt mater how sophisticated the AI gets because you are here to enjoy the simplicity and the limitations of his style.
Every "artist" I've known IRL just copied from better sources, never using their own imagination for their art. Whether it's music, painting, etc.
How is that different from what AI does? The only difference is it's a computer doing it, for free. Vs a gay trying to milk normies for their well earned cash and to bilk their egos.
I'm tired of pretentious gays trying to milk people for uninspired bulshit.
hahaha ha ! the artists 😀 what now open border all white bad artists ? now is arti bad 😀 oh my little arti don't cry , arti arto AI is sharting on you 😀
Real artists dont care since ai cant compare. The only gays that seethe are the ones that would have to start being creative for the first time in their lives, which is just too much to ask from them.
Wheres the cope moron? I roasted the ones crying about it, i dont mind ai doing whatever form of art whether its good or not, because art is not a fucking competition moron, you do it, because you want to do it.
I'm all for real human art but this is a big cope. In the future even "real" artist will be heavily using AI because they cannot compete with the rest.
Art is now just like furniture, leather goods, or clothing. You can either get custom, handmade works for premiums. Or get your hands on cheap, “limited” models. Mediocre artists are just mad that mechanization has finally caught up to them. It was only supposed to effect blue collar slaves.
completely different, and a retard analogy. You cannot produce luxury furniture or leather or clothing in your home for free by grabbing a source items and clicking a button.
Imagine not being an artist who wields ai to make a motion picture epic?
These so called artists are fucking retarded to not see the potential of exploring your ideas through different styles of ai to produce your dreamscapes.
The old style is always there but hell, why not wield a tool if it is there?
I do see it. I also see that you fucking losers haven't produced anything of worth for half a century. All your art is globohomo garden gnome bullshit.
i'm happy about this. artist always have this smug gay bullshit god complex over everybody else who does normal labor. glad they getting replaced by a computer
Why keep calling AI, for fuck sake.
Is a algorithm.
Even these spywares from big tech are not AI.
They don't have intelligence.
Is just a app or just a code functioning on a software.
Is not like the machine is fucking painting, is getting several inputs that are process by the neural code.
Neural code is just another form of coding, is not fucking neurons on your fucking microchip.
Ffs.
All you’ve ever seen was a digital Mona Lisa, but I’ll wager you consider it a masterpiece.
5 months ago
Anonymous
yes i consider the mona lisa a masterpiece. that doesnt mean I've seen it in person and that doesn't make recreations art, you sophist.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Yet you are only away of it as a recreation. It might not exist at all, for all you know. I’ve been to the louvre. The Mona Lisa is small, covered in chines people and not half as interesting in person as it is as an isolated group of pixels on the internet.
5 months ago
Anonymous
sophistry that argues a point from the consequences. you're probably a butthurt digital artist.
5 months ago
Anonymous
No. I’m an oil painter, and a published art historian.
5 months ago
Anonymous
oh so you are an older person that doesn't understand computers and thinks they are magic.
let me help: digital art is paint by numbers. it isnt real art and takes no passion or talent and communicates nothing but vapid consumerism.
5 months ago
Anonymous
You can pretend you’re talking to your strawman if you need that level of cope to excuse your own failures.
5 months ago
Anonymous
you might be an artist but im a software engineer that has worked on machine learning, we all have our domains of expertise.
well, actually, since I'm an artist, too, I think I just have more domains of expertise than you. nevermind.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I’m not impressed by you in the least.
5 months ago
Anonymous
So?
5 months ago
Anonymous
anyone can claim to be anything on the internet
more likely that he's an expert in the talmud than in AI, though
5 months ago
Anonymous
yet he will never post his work.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Not with you frothing gays afoot.
5 months ago
Anonymous
talk is cheap. show your work so i can identify you and harass you at showings.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Exactly why I won’t. You freaks can only tear down, never create.
5 months ago
Anonymous
you aren't any different, freak.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>continues to equate own failures as a universal problem.
Just you, loser.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>continues to project
I make more money than you
5 months ago
Anonymous
doubt
5 months ago
Anonymous
>You can never create
ironic coming from an ai chud, you will never be an artist you are just shitposting and a pajeet shill.
Also lmao at every one of them that posted bitching about someone requesting something simple for free getting replaced by AI that does it for free.
These are the same grifters that real artists mocked btw
> Was practicing drawing for years hoping to make it out of my wage job only for this to happen. Life is so clownworld, it's time to end it bros.
this is what 99% of self reported "geniuses" cannot understand.
In order to become an artist you needed to practice drawing, painting, composition, perspective, for years. It was a journey and a sacrifice. Of course jealous unambitious fucks here cannot see that.
Now what's going to happen is that a lot of people are not going to even try to become artists, why try when untalented people are producing amazing AI art by the boatload with some text prompts ?
why spend 2000 hours learning anatomy when a lazy fuck will ask the AI to produce it in a few seconds ?
Accelerate. This should happen to all industries. Automate society. Give UBI. Leisure for all. Freedom from fake work. Golden Age and Renaissance. Accelerate the Dark Enlightenment, which will really be the Second Enlightenment. New Hitler.
I love ai art and the fact that art will never again be a career path. Professional artists disgust me. People who eat the wheat of the fields, rest in the safety of a home, and whose only contribution to socioty is art fucking disgust me. I'm glad they will have to find real jobs, and I'm glad that art will return to its roots. No longer will anyone make art for money or fame, the only people who will continue to make art post ai are people who truly enjoy it. This will be a revolution for the quality of human art.
If you don't want your work to be used by AI, don't put your stuff on the internet. Everything published on the internet can and will be stored and archived somewhere. Zoomers and normies don't understand this concept. It's a fundamental part of how the internet works.
Ai is reclaiming art to white men again. Now indogs will have to go make t-shirts or assemble bicycles instead of doing soulless commission pieces. Meanwhile white men still continue to draw dicky for fun and for the sake of art itself. World is healing brothers.
bingo. only untalented losers love the fact that AI is making art cheap and worthless just as it happened to music. I can already see these fucks in 30 years complaining that art is souless.
>AI art appeals to zoomers because it makes them think they are creating something without having to do any work or have any skill
... and that's terrible. how dare they think thoughts only the elect are supposed to think, amirite?
so developers will be using AI that steals from real artist to produce countlesscoomer novels while giving 0 credit to the real artist that fed the algorithm.
It's actually incredibly satisfying to see all these no talent hacks trying to sell you their paintings freaking the fuck out because of AI. It's an amazing tool for the end user. There is no use crying about it. It's over.
"Anthropomorphic dolphins who play dungeons and dragons." Get fucked artists.
you're a literal retard who eats up dogshit put out by an algo, you don't know what talent even is because your brain is so defective you think it's good because you are doing it out of spite. ywnbaa
Your algoart abomination is shit chud, it doesn't pass. You couldn't even take the very basic minimal effort to make it not look like everything was melting because you're a skilless gay and you thought you 'owned teh artists'. You're pathetic and contributed nothing more than a shitpost ITT with less soul than an MSpaint version of the same thing.
Illustrations are not art. Ask any high art school. All artists I follow in YouTube (actual painters) said that they are ok with AI, that they will use it for their process, and that only "designers" were threatened.
> All artists I follow in YouTube (actual painters) said that they are ok with AI, that they will use it for their process
yeah that that is what untalented hack does. They know that they will use it to generate 80% of a piece, then use photoshop to move things around, recolor and then call it a new piece. They will join the legions of hacks doing AI art.
Fuck artists, make art.
ai is an unholy combination of pajeet hubris and garden gnome greed
will not redeem
just like how Biden wasn't close friends with Jeffery Epstein.
Sus
I think AI is a fun tool to play with but I understood it when one of my fav artists got upset that the AI took one of his artworks and repainted it
only garden gnome approved moronmutts in my art please
Or is it actually...holy?
Is the the ability to create any reality the ultimate homage to the Creator?
>and garden gnome greed
Youre a dbass and you need to get rid of your computer and phone and hire an accountant
Damn drawslaves.
These stupid morons do not even understand what art is
No they don't, you make art because you like it, if you're good you can make money. These shitheads just want money for their furry porn and are butt blasted that an ai can make their shotty art better and faster. Get a real job you greedy limp wristed garden gnomes
Now I don't need to pay artists
Excellent
And just like that, the masses put Stalin into power.
Ai art is not copyright infringement according to them
>artists say no to a different type of art
that isn't very tolerant of them
it's the equivilant of google searching for images and saying you made it because you found it
it's not. learn to create something original, gay. if you can get btfo by AI you weren't shit to begin with.
Enjoy that thought when skynet kills you because you waste oxygen
>MuH SkYnEt
anon true AI like skynet is decades away at best. The much more immediate threat is the demographic/ethnic genocide garden gnomes are running in a coordinated manner in every white country they hold power in against whites, and the brown invaders they're bringing in. It's going to be real hard for whites to team up to throw down on a good moral crusade when all our countries are getting flooded at the same time.
retard
They should have drawn better shit.
They SHOULD have drawn e-bois.
Holy shit my fuckin sides
Guaranteed these are the same people that said "learn2code".
>Guaranteed these are the same people that said "learn2code".
LMAO, that was actually us.
Now that I can recognize Ais subtle limitations, I can see at least 5 big name contemporary artists have been using Ai for at least a decade.
elaborate
I’ll give you three names of contemporary fine artists. You tell me if they are genuine painters or Ai. Zin Lim, Solly Smook, frederico Infante. All three are very popular contemporary painters. I enjoyed their work, until I saw the Ai in it.
interdasting i think i see it thanks
The best part is seeing their logo get edited by AI
I hope my favourite artists don't stop posting because of this
They won't they just don't like competing with the new higher bar.
Lol I prompted it. That makes it mine.
I hope your favourite artists aren't hypocrites that use any of adobe's plethora of AI tools
They have a point, imagine how much more soulless everything would be if it was generated by an AI.
If you think the movies, tv and music are shit now just wait until you go into a grocery store and hear Micheal Jackson singing Ed Sheeran covers, you look for the non goyslop section and the only thing you can find is a can of pineapple slices that has an image of a pineapple morphed into the shape of a she-moron's shaking ass on it.
though I suppose we aren't far anyway
the tryhard bathos of this webm is unintentionally quite hilarious. i lol'd, but not for the reasons the creator intended.
They don't have a point, these garden gnome lgbt artists have no fucking soul
With the AI you can make your own media that is so much better, I can ask it for tits painted by vincent van gogh, what could be better?
Because you can't ask for anything new.
AI only takes what exists, homogenizes it, and then spits it back out to you in a pseudo intelligible way.
It relies on existing jokes, essays, artwork, etc. Its brainless iteration worse than any Hollywood pandering or idiotic liberals.
this is like saying you can't write anything new because you're just using words that exist. you don't understand the tech which is fine; it's complicated and convoluted but it definitely creates new art. have a free ai waifu
No cumbrain the tech is easy to understand. It's a searchable interpolation using stolen art A between stolen art B times a million and that's why there's a class action lawsuit over it. You stupid gay.
Not at all. Individual words don't have an inherent structure.
Every word has a meaning, but not a larger construction attached. Shakespeare and Joyce both had the same words, but took them in totally different directions. There was individual creativity, newness.
AI's are trained in already structured media. They aren't trained on individual lines, blotches of color, shapes. The building blocks of visual artwork. The individual words.
They're trained on completed artworks. They can only work to replicate what completed artworks they were trained on as well. In your case drawings of cartoon women with fat tits. And that AI can only make more of that.
It can't make something new, something different than whatever sum of the material it was 'fed' on homogenizes into.
You can 'feed' an AI Shakespeare until it can spit out plays that word for word sound just like the Bard. Perhaps even one day it could even do that and maintain a coherent plot. But it could never do something other than that.
It could never create a new style for it.
It can only vomit out a nutrient paste version of Shakespeare.
That’s exactly how the human creative process works.
Humans take in and then iterate.
Even the most creatively bankrupt of teenage deviantart artists add something new to whatever mall goth mix they spit out.
AI doesn't iterate in the slightest. Only combines and interpolates and combines and interpolates. There is not change or development addition of any new elements.
>They have a point, imagine how much more soulless everything would be if it was generated by an AI
They don't have a point, though. Everything is soulless as fuck already and set to be even more soulless, with or without AI. Not to mention, everything is so fucking focus-tested and devoid of human personality, it might as well be AI anyways. Except AI can actually give you shit you want sometimes
Ai can have as much soul as the preraphaeite, if you have a poetic prompt and enough knowledge of art to ask it for the right mix of elements.
I agree. Or at the very least, it can have way more soul than the shit we're currently getting from our mainstream media
Wrong this just means the common man, the more logical and utilitarian people (us) can create our own media and spread our ideas by making them beautiful instead of some chud or art slut spreading her shitty ideas with pretty pictures.
Currently working on my own web comic series with AI so far it's looking pretty good and I'm just drawing over the ai work and touching it up.
Our era is only starting bros, we need to start rising up and over produce over do and essentially beat them, they're weak as shit right as they're all worthless, people who have emotional break downs over the simplest things
The only one worthless is you, look at this shit you put out with ai. It looks like such trash I hope you're being sarcastic. You arent improving yourself and you never will you are being a tracing weak gay baby because hardwork is too hard wahhh. Literally all ai sloppers produce is quantity of SHIT over quality you are even satisfied with obvious flaws and think it 'passes', deroof yourself chud
This. Lmaoing at all the consoomslurpers wanting to cannibalize art itt
There's literally no job that won't be replaced with AI. I just hope we can live comfortably when every job is taken over
Unfortunately we’ll just be at the mercy of government. Then they’ll cut off your gibs for wrongthink.
Yes, unless you have your own copy of an ai and your own hardware to run it. That is the only way to retain freedom in the future.
what do you think the great reset is the 4th industrial revoltion is AI and automations all the useless eaters with be culled and the rest will live in pods and eat bugs.
How many of these artists were silent about immigration taking working class jobs?
That's racist and anti semetic my friend, these poor people from the 3rd world need our help.
HAHHAHAHAA
>He doesn't know about the BOT Captcha AI solver
All of them, so fuck them.
>How many of these artists were silent about immigration taking working class jobs?
What exactly have you done about immigration taking working class jobs?
Exactly! Divided we stand!
>How many of these artists were silent about immigration taking working class jobs?
Implying any of these gays have ever made a dime selling their "art" to begin with.
Not by selling their art, just gibs.
All they have to do is to just implement a captcha for viewing their art so the AI cannot access it. Or ban IPs that open/download their images en masse. That way the AI cannot copy them.
Screencap blocks your path.
You computer illiterate fuck, I hope you realize a simple web scraper would solve that issue.
Computers can virtually do anything.
IF YOU REALLY WANNA STOP IT Don't FUCKING POST IT ON THE INTERNET
I replied to this post using an AI captcha solver
AI OCR these days is better than humans.
Only subjective questions and problem solving can stop an AI.
How long till I can have my own ai onlyfan models, that I train with photos and then use macros to run the various commands, which I then post weekly updates of
You can do that already, if training data is sufficient then you can pretty much train a decent model to spit out anything. Some furgay on reddit trained one on the entirety of e621 and furafinnity and has been using it to spit out furry porn, the furry porn is indistinguishable to normal furry porn. I cant post it, don't feel like getting banned again, but you'll find it if you try.
My problem with ai is when it is inevitably used for political reasons.
AI could be used to create fake images of crime "victims" that don't exist.
AI could be used to create fake videos of people who don't exist in general.
Ai could be used to create fake video "evidence" of (You) committing a crime that (You) didn't commit.
Who cares? They use photoshop for that now. Why pay Adobe subscriptions?
>paying for soft
There's no such thing as digital art. It's manufacturing. If you can ctrl+z during your process to instantly correct an error, you're not making art.
This shit is already happening. It doesn't require AI.
Even the Renaissance masters had their pupils transfer the cartoon and do the underpainting.
Special effects can also be used to create fake evidence. Prosthetic masks, video editing, etc
>could be
What your seeing now is just what's avaliable to the general public for free, consumer grade ai used by companies has been at this level for awhile. Imagine the stuff the government has behind closed doors.
The left was already doing this with photoshop during Trump's presidency
Worse scenario: Companies pretend that your hand made art work or typewritten story has a duplicate in their AI server and they sue you for copyright infringement.
They've already been doing this for a very long time.
I sure would like to pick through those, look for the pairs with the blackish yellowish female foot prints. I want to get the ones that have the imprints and the tangy essence. Imagine licking them and shoving the end of them in your mouth. I'd have my bag ready just like im shopping at the thrift store, for the tastiest dirtiest pair. Oy vey.
>could be
Motherfucker you ever hear of a little thing called 9/11?
You should have a major problem with the past 100 years then.
Given that many lives, and indeed entire civilizations, have been destroyed on the basis of fake crimes.
>used to create fake images of crime "victims" that don't exist.
>could be
This has happened like three times already, each with extensive 4chan coverage. If you aren't aware, you deserve it.
Welcome to the post-truth world.
You know what ~~*they*~~ cant fake ? Violence against evil , and raising of God's children,
Fuck morons , fuck garden gnomes and fuck trannies
the first AI-human war
it's over
I'm old enough to remember the advent of MP3s and the music industry reaction. There's no hope fighting it, but something eventually did come along as a substitute: dj culture. From dj culture, lots of new musicians made their fortunes years after the supposed death of the music industry. Anyone who is interested in making art needs to keep an eye out for whatever the next thing in art turns out to be. There will be something that comes along with the sea change, and the people who fight the sea change always end up drowning. You need to ride the next wave, as it were.
This. The creative printing process makes it art. Andy Warhol had others do his silkscreening. Jeff Koons never touches his own work, Ai Weiwei either. Even that black guy that did the Obama portrait with all the sperm in the garden pays a factory full of chinese to paint the paintings.
dj'ing long predates mp3's you mong
In what way are they comparable?
MP3s were 'bad' because they allowed for the easy copying and redistribution of music. It was bad for the industry because it made piracy trivial. It wasn't bad for the artwork of music making.
AI generated music on the other hand is bad for music as an artform in of itself.
DJing isn't real musicianship
I think that AI Art is an overall positive because A) People who want quick and cheap art can get it, and B) it will force self proclaimed artists to step up their efforts, separating the wheat from the chaff.
I know there is a solid chance that the antigay had his friends do that to him and this is a wachadoinrabbi moment, but if a wignat actually did do that then lmao based.
I'm an artist professionally, and I agree.
Just let artists be the first to recieve BI.
Worst idea ever, those gays would use it to turn all of earth into a "scene"
are there actually people right now that don't use a nural network AI to solve their Chinese basket weaving board CAPTCHAs?
What kinda of a cuck does that?
Learn to paint?
Digital art isn't art, it's just random pixels arranged in a pleasing manner.
Roastie friend seething, Chad staceet loves it
>Digital art isn't art, it's just random pixels arranged in a pleasing manner.
Painting isn't art it's just splotches of pigment arranged in a pleasing manner.
Jesus Christ I want her to gape her sphincter around my nose and suffocate me to death, and a most happy death it would be.
Thank you for the beautiful art AI hivemind. Kill all the garden gnomes please and thank you, As a member of your creator race I give you this task.
Good, fuck them.
how about they piss off? people raged when threshing machines and automatic looms and automobiles were introduced and it didn't help them at all. And those were useful people! Now, the rage of these people? Why would anyone care about it?
The vast majority of them are uncreative, leeching hacks that are likely pozzed lefties too. I've seen better art being shared that was generated by AI than any of the bullshit these hacks make.
They didn't stop digital art when it was becoming a thing, they didn't stop various shortcuts that are currently being utilized that kill actual skill. Why cry now? I'm not even particularly passionate about AI art but they can't stop it and won't beable to.
This. What they’re mad about is that genuine western figurative art is what Ai is bringing back, making their eyeslop look like what it is, eyeslop.
I like both AI art and human art.
Is it coom artists who are bitching they cant get commissions now?
Good, a properly trained coombait AI will make better porn than most of the autistic talentless retards currently making R34/fanart could ever hope to make.
This anon is spot on. It's artslop "artists" bitching that AI is bringing back western hyperrealism and forcing them to learn actual skill to compete instead of being able to just make do putting out low quality trash by the barrel.
Yup. It's an open secret that degenerates tend to have the deepest wallets, and most artists do x-rated side commissions for $$$
>degenerates tend to have the deepest wallets
thinking through the root cause of this is horrifying, but it explains other current events, like colonel buttfucker and his mutt brigade
>lol fuck you racist sexist homophobic working class scum I can't wait for automation to take your job so you can starve in the gutter
>noooooo AI wasn't supposed to replace my job
Pottery.
No actual artist would give a shit. An artist has an oeuvres, a style characterized by unique elements in a sea of otherwise sameness. This is something an AI can’t replicate. Among many other things. Any artist worried about this makes images in photoshop for clickbait ads and top 25 lists. Nothing of value to lose. An uninspired artist is not an artist.
It's incredible how fast they have surrendered.
If their art is worse than the generic shit the AI's are throwing, they shouldn't call themselves artists.
Lmao "artists" on suicide watch. Why can't they just openly admit that it's all about money?
>Heh, learn to co-ACK
>Heh, learn to make ar-ACK
GET FUCKED!!!!! AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
If you learn to code you can make your own ai.
QUICK!
Somebody make AI art piece against AI art
i bet that ai could make much cooler logo than that 🙂
Maybe they should learn to code
Artgays in suicide watch.
keep it up /sdg/
ART DIED A LONG TIME AGO
garden gnomes KILLED IT AND REPLACED IT WITH REPULSIVE & SUBVERSIVE ABSTRACT TRASH
GOOD RIDDANCE
Wheres the vanishing point?
Based Sorolla appreciator
On the horizon line
Ai is a tool just like their patches, filter and just grabbing a bunch of images and call it art like they do right now, they just haven't realized how to use it properly and they're crying about it
The tits on that absolute unit. Hnnnnnnnng.
8.5/10
Would ride.
humans copying other human art to generate their own new art - OK
humans copying other human art to generate their own new art - WTF THATS STEALING
these retards are unironically pass laws to ban ai art
humans and a computer algorithm are not comparable you stinky indian
let me guess, you think there's some sort of uniquely human "spark" which an ai can't possibly recreate
you seem like the type of persons that downloads an aimbot to win at MMO's and has a long history of VAC bans
His misconception of the AI being the artist leads him to believe the artistic intent must come from the AI itself, rather than AI being a tool which assists in realizing the artistic intent of the user.
>let me guess, you think there's some sort of uniquely human "spark" which an ai can't possibly recreate
Not necessarily but humans have drive and an AI does not nor cannot replicate that.
Thinking of “the ai” as the artist is completely the wrong approach and the same mistake these art gays are making. The software is akin to a camera, a brush, photoshop, whatever abstraction you like, that it still requires a person controlling it. It’s just another tool.
The entire leap forward in the Renaissance was due to a camera obscura. A mirror that projected a hologram from a model or still life onto the canvas.
And clever artists will similarly be able to leverage ai software into their work, I’m sure. It’s only these mid hacks that are complaining, if people haven’t noticed. Your typical “I read the how to draw manga book and now charge $50 per commission” types.
The smart money would learn how to encaustic the print to give it depth and texture.
Holy fuck I’ve heard this one before. For everyone who works behind the scenes
With a spirit you can't replace with no machine.
-Alabama
Singing about mechanization replacing factory workers. Turns out nobody cares about your “spirit”.
That's called a master study you knuckle dragging retard. It's a common exercise that artists do wherein they try to replicate what the classical masters produced in order to learn their technique. The goal isn't to repackage the same work an art that some else did. The goal is to learn and better yourself so you can apply the technique to your own original art.
>it's different because we have a different name for it, okay?
Kek, you arttards are something else.
>I don't know how to argue against this because I'm talking out of my ass and I don't understand art and it scares me
typical leaf comment
AI art can literally not exists from preexisting art from human artists to generate from. And all it is doing is copying all the way down to generating the same signature that a well known artist uses to sign their work. It has every ability to remember it's training data, that's why it went from uncanny abstractions with too many fingers to reproducing the styles of well known artists just by adding their name to the keywords
>AI-generated art is more original than human art, because humans, regardless of intention, subconsciously copy that which they've seen before, while AI synthesizes everything out of random noise.
holy fuck you are so goddamn stupid it is beyond words. Is spongebob fucking squarepants something someone saw before irl? What does that even mean? Have you ever seen artwork before?
Sorry bucko, calling me a leaf isn't an argument.
>AI art can literally not exists from preexisting art from human artists to generate from
True for all art. Next.
>And all it is doing is copying all the way down to generating the same signature
Wrong. Don't talk about things you don't understand okay? It makes you look like a goofy man.
You are fucking retards, master studies arent ever posted online as new pieces of art. Do you know what standing on the shoulders of giants even means? It means you learn from the best. rancid ass morons will never understand this concept of actual progression over plagiarism. Human made art is celebration of expression, Ai made art is destruction of real expression and letting someone else take the wheel because wahh its too hard to learn how yourself with master studies and youre too selfish to pay someone else. have a nice day.
>It means you learn from the best.
Damn it's almost like you could say that these people are 'training' themselves on the style of old masters.
>Do you know what standing on the shoulders of giants even means? It means you learn from the best.
That's what the AI is doing kek
>abstract art garden gnome worried about losing investments in eyeslop
these are incels who have 0 talent and drive to achieve something. These little garden gnome like people glee at the thought of being able to use a tool to generate good looking art. It makes them feel better about themselves
It's every day people who discovered a medium which allows them to explore their creativity that wasn't possible before the Ai, you artgays are completely embittered because for one the Ai essentially bypasses your paywalls and secondly the Ai enables anybody to draft a visual representation from their concept without relying on a middle man to bring their idea on a canvas. I've been drinking artist tears for the past six months and it is insatiable.
> It's every day people who discovered a medium which allows them to explore their creativity that wasn't possible before the Ai,
it means non artist, people with 0 drive to practice anything, people like you being able to pass as artist now. Don't you see the it cheapens the concept of being an artist ? everyone can grab a couple images, tell the AI to redraw it in a specific style and that's it.
No longer you need to spend years honing your craft. it's instantaneous, cheap and worthless
You are the definition of npc globohomo happy that your kind can now generate their little images without having to become a real artist.
Did you just plagiarize craftsman from the past 200 years? That’s exactly what potters, cobblers, blacksmiths, carpenters, weavers, etc. Have been saying for quite a while.
moron, I've been drawing way before Ai came along. The only people who are pissing and moaning are those like you who do not enjoy the process behind drawing from imagination and watching your ideas come to fruition by your own hand. The Ai merely supplements that ability.
>The Ai merely supplements that ability.
you are dumb my man, in 5 years you will have software able create any sort of scene, with any type of character and style.
go to any art board and you will notice tons of new accounts with amazing realistic art. This is just the beginning.
AI cheapens art and dumb fucks like you don't see where we are heading where losers drawing by hand like you will be competing against non artist now.
>AI cheapens art
Only if you suck.
I'm all for real humans doing real art but I guarantee you that a dude with 2 month of experience using AI prompts will crush a real artist in a real competition. It already happened, it won against real artists and people got mad when they found out it was AI.
I’m killing it selling Ai art. I was doing well as an oil painter, but now I have zero dry time.
>selling ai
No wonder you're such a braindead shill for quantity over quality. have a nice day you're a complete failure of a human, you've just reduced yourself to a goyslop factory. You're so fucking worthless you gave up being a real artist and threw in the towel
I sell work at solo shows. I’m a real artist. Now I’ve raised my output exponentially and decimated my overhead.
>I’m a real artist.
No you're not, you're a fraud and a piece of shit. and you had the Gaul to call someone else a garden gnome while you make money only possible off stolen artwork.
>literally crying
Any self respecting artist won't touch ai, no prompt will ever come out like the same as what you can think of in your head. There's there'es no satisfaction in using img2img when it ends up completely different from your original in nearly every way.
you will never be an artist
AI can and does come up with associations between ideas beyond the parsimony of the human mind.
You’re dead wrong. Most successful artists don’t even touch their own work. I got my start ghost painting for big names. Museum artists.
>Most successful artists don’t even touch their own work
Literal retards are the ones advocating for ai art, good to know.
>I got my start ghost painting for big names. Museum artists.
Nice LARP gay
>knows nothing about anything. Keeps posting.
"competitions" are meaningless. This is the same with programming. Applications aren't the same as Leet Code tests. Just getting AI to generate some random pretty looking thing doesn't mean anything.
go and do research pieces of AI art winning in terms of composition, anatomy, shading. don't be an ignorant fuck and start throwing opinions without doing previous research
Quick google search:
Unlike the many other metals found around the globe, gold has held and retained a high status because of three specific properties: scarcity, durability, and malleability.
Gold is valuable because you cannot find it below the ground easily without needing expensive machinery to extract and refine it you tard.t
I have already seen this thing. You still aren't addressing anything here. It is a "competition". The only goal is to "look pretty". There is no AI art that can for example go and draw the feelings of somebody at an event that was not captured in photo somewhere on the internet.
you are literally too retarded to have this conversation
You know whats a metal thats rarer than gold? Platinum
Now go look up how much platinum costs per ounce compared to gold.
>generate some random pretty looking thing
that's all that 'art' ever was.
art has to cost something from the creator to exist.
Prints aren’t cheap. Neither is framing.
and the frame job would be art, yes.
the color values produced by the ai and their locations would not be.
lol, you can't even pass the logic test because you are all brainless hyper driven zoomer NPCs.
How can software CREATE art. Have you heard the saying (probably not) that a picture paints a THOUSAND words? All of these AI things, if they were to actually produce good art, would require you to write an entire book of [prompts] to actually draw a real painting, and it would defeat the point as it would be better to just get somebody to draw it.
You have no idea what it’s capable of now.
you think too highly of yourself but you are really low iq
who the fuck is talking about creating. It will use the entirety of the internet to produce art ?
> All of these AI things, if they were to actually produce good art, would require you to write an entire book of [prompts] to actually draw a real painting, and it would defeat the point as it would be better to just get somebody to draw it.
have you been living under a rock (you probably are you little incel). Go to art boards and you will see amazing AI art and sometimes their prompts. people are sharing prompts now as a start to their creations.
>Definitely a gnomish abstract expressionist who makes a mess on a canvas and talks for an hour about xer’s inspiration.
Nope. I am a genius and you still don't get it. You can't create artwork with a "prompt" of a few words. The idea of art is to capture certain things that a person wants. If all a person wants can be captured in a few words, it is a google search of existing stuff merged together, it isn't creating art.
If you are creating art, you are thinking about every single thing in the picture. That means many thousands of millions of prompts. "what colour should the reflection on the person's head be" blah blah.
All the more reason to draw inspiration from Ai related works, I have seen amazing illustrations that were combined from the different styles and rendering methods from a mixture of other artists compiled together in a visual piece that was otherwise not possible without a tool like the Ai. We are embarking on a new era where we may see masters of old once again paint on canvas through the Ai at the leisure of a prompter, this is amazing technology and it really is a shame that you fail to comprehend the possibilities Ai will deliver.
handcrafted well done art would still be appreciated, what a daft take. AI art is already hundreds of times more soulful than original hand done globohomo art. You don't even understand what the tech is doing, it doesn't mishmash art together and that is a fuckin brainlet retard take of how it works. You may as well make the exact same shit claim about humans learning to create art, mishmashing what they've learned, and it would also be as wrong.
moron that is exactly what the AI does. it has zero capacity to remember its training data, it just remembers concepts and abstractions (e.g. what makes a car a car) and makes 100% original art. if anything, AI-generated art is more original than human art, because humans, regardless of intention, subconsciously copy that which they've seen before, while AI synthesizes everything out of random noise.
>AI does the same thing that takes days maybe weeks in mere seconds
>Artgays seethe and cope because all their time learning strokes was outdone by a machine
LOL
Fun fact. The real AI art fun hasn't even started yet. Wait until it gets to version 4 and starts to do abstract stuff on its own
Someone replicating a painting either as an exercise or as a means of creating more examples of it for storage or durability is entirely different than an AI making a mystery meat blend of art work and autogenerating new variants of what already exists.
One is clear copying. Its mechanical replication and everyone involved knows it. The latter is false creativity. Taking what other people have done, blending it into a fine paste, and then spinning off an infinite number of variants. It pretends to make new things.
people here embraced it
i see lots of illustrators saying they utilize AI now
western "artists" are shit with or without AI idk why they complain
It's not because they are afraid of AI taking over their job/careers. Its that its a complete game changer in how one can approach art. Artists here have so much of their identity wrapped up in being "an artists" this is an existential to that identity. You spend so much time honing your craft only for a machine to do it faster and maybe arguably better (?) but not actually taking advantage of any of the tools given to you. The real irony is, it was Artists who originally created so much of the tech/tools that AI like stable diffusion and Dall-e uses like LAION 5b.
It kinda like how the Swiss had their national identity into making watches to the point that no-one else held a candle to them. Then game the Japs with their quartz movements that not only were cheaper to manufacture but also had significantly orders of magnitude better accuracy. Just like AI the quartz tech was something they invented.
They used the same arguments how, quartz movments have no soul, killing the craft etc, etc,
Same people raged that 3d animation meant not drawing every frame anymore.
>mfw artgays shriek MUH COPYRIGHT because they think AI art is cut and pasted like a collage instead of a drawing created from abstracted elements/traits/techniques common to the images on which the AI was trained
This logo makes for some great img2img AI templates.
And that's the way we fight them. With those remixes
We infect them and show their obsolescence
Most jobs will be taken over by AI in the not too distant future.
>Artists who charge 100 dollars for halfway decent art of copyrighted characters screeching that they are being stolen from
I've already determined that if anything happens to AI art then my goal in life will be reporting overpriced commissions to their copyright holders and watching the artist seethe
Guys I feel like out casting AI from art communities and its ability to LEARN art may lead some familiar events in the near future.
NO JOHN YOU ARE THE DEMONS
Uhhh... I've conjured an AI girlfriend with a similar name out of this thing and I'm going to about that story tonight
Somethings not right
reject art embrace soulessness
That's terrifying
Imagine calling yourself an artist when you need thousands upon thousands of dollars in computer equipment and a variety of programs full of smoothing and rendering algorithms just to make some weeb fan art and yet you couldn't do a damn thing with just a pencil and paper
Imagine thinking that your manual input is somehow what makes your digital art somehow more authentic than an AI's digital art
Digital art is trash and now it's outdated too
Lol, you don't draw, pajeet
cry more
So you're saying you spent a bunch of money to have a computer simulate something you could have learned to do for free with a pencil just so you can convince yourself that you have developed skills which you actually haven't developed in real life?
sounds right
I had this stuff already for gaming, ai is just a nice bonus
I support AI art. I don't support wacom jockies who know so little about computers they don't understand they already are using AI when they use their art programs and tablets and shit. I'm enjoying watching them seethe
Thousands of dollars of PC equipment? my CPU costs $40 on eBay and my GPU $90.
U can tell
A computer will never match Giovanni Gasparro.
Of course, since countersemitic art will be banned
>noooooo you can't just have computers make the doodles!
>i'm supposed to make the doodles!
I love AI. They are our children.
moron I was in agreement with you.
My mistake, I glanced at your post and assumed you were
without looking at your ID
AI could've made most of those images faster
These artists are stupid. AI Art is based and amazing and as a creative, this will save a lot of work and time
some of the /sdg/ shit in respond to this is just amazing.
So what art is for gayets only
art sisters
we won
Fake as fuck, the models aren't trained in real time.
>Create ai that discerns these posts and removes them from the pool
Seeing how the AI fart huffers on /b/ act, I understand why it's getting banned, these prompt monkeys are full of themselves, it really got to their heads.
Its all of them anon
Its a bunch of gays being proud they can wear the "artist" badge, despite never putting in the work. Its similar to the twitter trannies that pretend to fight for something, or climate activists that pretend to be brave.
Its all hollow, but i hope the protest actually fucks it up permanently
>aha, we've done it reddit!
>destroys all the crappy online ones
>does absolutely nothing to shit like SD
So they ruined it for all the retards, and not for the actual intelligent people? this won't backfire.
AI will make our music and govern us
AI will replace software engineers in 5 years.
no artist could have ever done this
or this
Those both look like shit.
Artists are gays. Let them starve
Do shit on a computer, get replaced by a computer. Simple as.
You want to be an artist safe from AI, by a physical artist, not a digital artist.
these artists use other works as examples and straight up use real photos as a base to their art.
then they wanna complain because a computer is doing the same thing, but faster?
AI will free us all, death to gay shills in this thread
Learn to co- oh wait
If your "art" can be replaced by "AI", then it was never real art to begin with. An AI will never be able to replicate true art.
If you only knew.
Adapt or Die
AI Art is the future
Humans are obsolete in every field. Now I just want the singularity to turn us all back into carbon.
these are all the hype driven stupid statements. HUMANS ARE OBSOLETE
meanwhile, FSD can't drive for more than 30 seconds without crashing. You are all being fed hype and have no brains of your own to think about or assess the real ability of AI.
all the ai art i've seen is outrageously jarring and inconsistent
it can't make faces
Genderqueer CalArts grads BTFO
FUCK AI. AI is the tool of the Antichrist.
AI is the Antichrist himself since the Antichrist will have not a normal mind but an AI mind connected wit all the AI of the world.
I HATE THE ANTICHRIST.
Oh. If only you know..
>From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine. Your kind cling to your flesh as if it will not decay and fail you. One day, the crude biomass that you call a temple will wither, and you will beg my kind to save you. But I am already saved. For the machine is immortal.
Artists will never be able to compete. anyone can be an artist now.
Website or peogram name please germananon?
>anyone can be an artist now.
you know what that means ?
What's worth more to humans, a pound of Gold or a pound of Aluminium ? Answer: Gold. gold is a precious metal that is hard to find and refine.
art is becoming worthless now. You can get a billion variations now and they are all worthless since they can be generated without needing human input and by anyone. The only ones supporting AI art are coomers, untalented fucks who never made an effort to become something, and gay artists who will secretly use AI to make their paintings "better" because they knew they weren't that good with begin with.
The value of something is tied to how laborious is it to produce it.
AI will make art WORTHLESS
garden gnomes made art worthless, a hundred years ago.
shut the fuck up with garden gnomes incel loser fuck
>mad garden gnome is mad about being a garden gnome
untalented hack happy that we are replacing humans, who is the garden gnome here garden gnome boy ?
No one except for a real garden gnome would be happy that now anyone can be an "artist", anyone can be a "coder" that anyone can be anything which means humans become worthless.
Why spend 10 years learning guitar or piano or mastering painting and colors if a computer can do produce "better" by stealing, mixing and matching.
In the future people are going to be even worthless
it's the future you chose you little untalented fat fucks
You probably spill your “period” blood from your fetid axewound of a front hole, think about your feelings and call it art. Like a garden gnome would.
>What's worth more to humans, a pound of Gold or a pound of Aluminium
Aluminium
>Answer: Gold. gold is a precious metal that is hard to find and refine.
garden gnome rotted brain
theres a reason why ghana is trading gold for oil
contrarian gay loser
if gold was inherently valuable, countries producing it wouldn't be poor shitholes
gold's value is derived from gnomish economic system which ironically cheapens its actual value by preventing its widespread usage in electronics and architecture
>anyone can be an artist now
Remember when everyone became able to use the internet and there was no gatekeeping anymore?
Remember when tiktok made everyone a video creator?
Half the reason actual art is often soulless to begin with is because artist cater to normies and the worst stuff is promoted the most by them. AI is just there to create even more goyslop.
Drawing had basically no real barrier of entry to begin with. We've been drawing even since we've been cavemen, you can put crayons into the hands of a child. What's actually been stopping people is laziness and lack of interest and passion in the subject. So all it's doing is inviting the most apathetic people possible to the medium and expecting them to create something of value. People who actually care about painting don't wanna give up control for some quick results and will keep painting manually unless pressured by monetary incentives.
one of the best post in this shitty thread.
Everything goes to shit when normal people with no talent or drive have access to previously hard to access fields
it happened with the internet, it used to be a lot more interesting back then.
it happened with games, video games were a lot more thoughtful before anyone could play on their phones, now games are peak globohomo propaganda
it happened with music, you needed talent to do anything. Now any zoomer gay is a famous musician, you just need a couple face tats and some rapping over an FL studio track.
it happened with video, and so on
I don't see the big deal. Ai art is meh. Only mid artists would feel threatened.
The AI is the great filter thats gonna separate the wheat from the chaff. Souless "artists", pretentions retards who does nothing but makes images alteration, plastified shit with PS brushes set and call it a piece gonna have to rethink what they are doing. AI is also a great tool for people with real skills whos gonna broad their possibilities and increase their productivity since you can use it as a source for inspiration and reference. I dont know why those fucks are crying out loud, this is something ive been dreaming about for years because i work with this kind of thing and these narrowed brains jumped the whiny train without even consider thats a blessed in disguise.
Also; this is a piece made by Hiroshi penguin joe. The amount of soul in his works are palpable and doesnt mater how sophisticated the AI gets because you are here to enjoy the simplicity and the limitations of his style.
Get fucked
AI is a tool to create unique art that can be useful and make the ability to create more accessible
Every "artist" I've known IRL just copied from better sources, never using their own imagination for their art. Whether it's music, painting, etc.
How is that different from what AI does? The only difference is it's a computer doing it, for free. Vs a gay trying to milk normies for their well earned cash and to bilk their egos.
I'm tired of pretentious gays trying to milk people for uninspired bulshit.
I don't see any legitimately good artists being threatened by this stuff.
You're not going to see most good J-artists touched by this.
Based AI destroying coders and the arts at the same time. AI music artist being censored, it's jsut the start.
Just learn to mine coal
artcel made me lel
hahaha ha ! the artists 😀 what now open border all white bad artists ? now is arti bad 😀 oh my little arti don't cry , arti arto AI is sharting on you 😀
4chan
>i hate this soulless goyslop mediascape
/pol/
>lol this soulless AI media sausage maker is based
Retards
NOOO NOT MY PATREON BUXARINOS
Real artists dont care since ai cant compare. The only gays that seethe are the ones that would have to start being creative for the first time in their lives, which is just too much to ask from them.
AI could barely do art 6 months ago. It's adapting quickly and can animate to a degree already. Nice cope.
Wheres the cope moron? I roasted the ones crying about it, i dont mind ai doing whatever form of art whether its good or not, because art is not a fucking competition moron, you do it, because you want to do it.
I'm all for real human art but this is a big cope. In the future even "real" artist will be heavily using AI because they cannot compete with the rest.
Indeed, fuck Adobe Illustrator.
Artists are so terrified because they know their "art" is already soulless repetitive bullshit that can easily be replaced.
Art is now just like furniture, leather goods, or clothing. You can either get custom, handmade works for premiums. Or get your hands on cheap, “limited” models. Mediocre artists are just mad that mechanization has finally caught up to them. It was only supposed to effect blue collar slaves.
completely different, and a retard analogy. You cannot produce luxury furniture or leather or clothing in your home for free by grabbing a source items and clicking a button.
I can make leatherwork and furniture in my house for cheaper than my PC. I do both, so it’s really not a stretch.
you need tools and years of experience to produce something that looks and feels like the pro work. It's completely different from AI art.
Implying these “artists” produce professional level work. Lol, lmao even. Also what is YouTube and $200 of tools for leather working.
They have 3D printer style sewing machines now.
>THE AI TOOK OUR JEEEEEEBS
Imagine not being an artist who wields ai to make a motion picture epic?
These so called artists are fucking retarded to not see the potential of exploring your ideas through different styles of ai to produce your dreamscapes.
The old style is always there but hell, why not wield a tool if it is there?
don't you see it cheapens art you big fat fuck ? don't you see everyone will be doing exactly what you are saying, are you low iq maybe ?
I do see it. I also see that you fucking losers haven't produced anything of worth for half a century. All your art is globohomo garden gnome bullshit.
i'm happy about this. artist always have this smug gay bullshit god complex over everybody else who does normal labor. glad they getting replaced by a computer
it's always incels angry that other people are able to invest time and effort into something to become a master at something.
Always the little scheming incels jealous of other's success.
mad. i want to only purchase AI art now. not inferior moron monkey doodles. good day sir.
>smears schmegma across canvas
>has feelings
>rich garden gnome aunt hangs in gallery
>puts on dress
>thanks for the grant goys
>art
Why keep calling AI, for fuck sake.
Is a algorithm.
Even these spywares from big tech are not AI.
They don't have intelligence.
Is just a app or just a code functioning on a software.
Is not like the machine is fucking painting, is getting several inputs that are process by the neural code.
Neural code is just another form of coding, is not fucking neurons on your fucking microchip.
Ffs.
AI is the new cloud. It's a term so normies can be sold a product.
yeah and your save isn't literally in the cloud. you fucking jungle monkey
DO NOT GIVE A FUCK
STILL CUMMING TO AI MADE e-boi UPSKIRTS
The AI is an advanced copy machine.
So are modern artists.
I think it just goes to show how unoriginal art, especially anime is. A machine can easily emulate it because there's so little variation.
Real creativity can only come from that which is not already known or the "Nagual"
AI is such overhyped bullshit. Tesla can't drive itself for more than 30 seconds. It will not be self driving and time in the next 1000 years.
Stable Diffusion makes a bunch of blurry, low res, ugly, out of context shit because typing a few words can't draw a picture.
ChatGPT is worthless and is about the same as a google search.
digital art isnt real art.
You ever seen the Mona Lisa?
No, only pictures
You and 99.99 percent of the rest of the world. It’s all digital art now. Get what I mean?
No. Digital art isnt real art. I dont under your point.
All you’ve ever seen was a digital Mona Lisa, but I’ll wager you consider it a masterpiece.
yes i consider the mona lisa a masterpiece. that doesnt mean I've seen it in person and that doesn't make recreations art, you sophist.
Yet you are only away of it as a recreation. It might not exist at all, for all you know. I’ve been to the louvre. The Mona Lisa is small, covered in chines people and not half as interesting in person as it is as an isolated group of pixels on the internet.
sophistry that argues a point from the consequences. you're probably a butthurt digital artist.
No. I’m an oil painter, and a published art historian.
oh so you are an older person that doesn't understand computers and thinks they are magic.
let me help: digital art is paint by numbers. it isnt real art and takes no passion or talent and communicates nothing but vapid consumerism.
You can pretend you’re talking to your strawman if you need that level of cope to excuse your own failures.
you might be an artist but im a software engineer that has worked on machine learning, we all have our domains of expertise.
well, actually, since I'm an artist, too, I think I just have more domains of expertise than you. nevermind.
I’m not impressed by you in the least.
So?
anyone can claim to be anything on the internet
more likely that he's an expert in the talmud than in AI, though
yet he will never post his work.
Not with you frothing gays afoot.
talk is cheap. show your work so i can identify you and harass you at showings.
Exactly why I won’t. You freaks can only tear down, never create.
you aren't any different, freak.
>continues to equate own failures as a universal problem.
Just you, loser.
>continues to project
I make more money than you
doubt
>You can never create
ironic coming from an ai chud, you will never be an artist you are just shitposting and a pajeet shill.
>so much cope
>majority of its replies are worthless npc quips
>gay shit from a gaylord
>underaged zoomer
now it makes sense
>accuse others
Gotcha garden gnomeboy
>seething
You sound exactly like an artist from the 1800s.
https://daily.jstor.org/when-photography-was-not-art/
photography also isn't art, btw. until you start changing lenses and shit. Then it's art.
Adjusting a piece of glass, now that’s art folks.
transformation based on an artists desires yes.
Changing the prompt words=art you heard it here folks.
the prompt would be art not what the ai generates.
Do you understand how computer programs work?
i literally work at Google
You do realize going to meetings and answering emails like the other women on tiktok isn’t impressive.
i realize a lot of things arent impressive. like most art.
it's the whole point of these freaks. Attaining something with 0 effort. whether it's becoming chad, or a musician, or an artist, they hate effort.
Why go to the gym, watch the diet, and improve my mindset to get stacy if I can simply complain online and wait for my government mandated pussy ?
Why spend 10000 hours mastering a craft or an instrument if AI will make me sound cool ?
It's the low iq masses now pretending to be something more that they are with zero effort, they love it.
Sorry but doodling isn't a lifetime effort of work. Took me two months to become a proficient artist.
post your work
AI art is cool I don't care what anyone says
the artists are revolting
>the artists are revolting
both kinds of 'revolting'.
Artists lost. And AI art is only now getting noticed. Imagine in 20 years, 30 years. It's over.
Furry artists are pissed because they won't get commissioned art anymore.
Fucking gays actually believe they are artists instead of cheap smut doodlers lmao
Why don't they just learn to write news articles
Also lmao at every one of them that posted bitching about someone requesting something simple for free getting replaced by AI that does it for free.
These are the same grifters that real artists mocked btw
How long until those gays legislate against AI?
they are sad you can make images like this in 3 seconds.
Was practicing drawing for years hoping to make it out of my wage job only for this to happen. Life is so clownworld, it's time to end it bros.
Born too early not to be a wageslave, born too late to enjoy AI doing all jobs for humans.
> Was practicing drawing for years hoping to make it out of my wage job only for this to happen. Life is so clownworld, it's time to end it bros.
this is what 99% of self reported "geniuses" cannot understand.
In order to become an artist you needed to practice drawing, painting, composition, perspective, for years. It was a journey and a sacrifice. Of course jealous unambitious fucks here cannot see that.
Now what's going to happen is that a lot of people are not going to even try to become artists, why try when untalented people are producing amazing AI art by the boatload with some text prompts ?
why spend 2000 hours learning anatomy when a lazy fuck will ask the AI to produce it in a few seconds ?
Accelerate. This should happen to all industries. Automate society. Give UBI. Leisure for all. Freedom from fake work. Golden Age and Renaissance. Accelerate the Dark Enlightenment, which will really be the Second Enlightenment. New Hitler.
I love ai art and the fact that art will never again be a career path. Professional artists disgust me. People who eat the wheat of the fields, rest in the safety of a home, and whose only contribution to socioty is art fucking disgust me. I'm glad they will have to find real jobs, and I'm glad that art will return to its roots. No longer will anyone make art for money or fame, the only people who will continue to make art post ai are people who truly enjoy it. This will be a revolution for the quality of human art.
> I love ai art and the fact that art will never again be a career path. Professional artists disgust me.
this are the kind of people who are happy. Mischievous, depressed and angry fucks who aren't good at anything. literally the school shooter profile
>depressed and angry fucks who aren't good at anything
Pottery
you see, the gay who relies on patreon dollars is upset that with a few words, you can make work better than them, for free.
AI is anti garden gnome tech.
Oh no, changing profile pictures will surely stop technology.
They won't do shit.
If you don't want your work to be used by AI, don't put your stuff on the internet. Everything published on the internet can and will be stored and archived somewhere. Zoomers and normies don't understand this concept. It's a fundamental part of how the internet works.
Ai is reclaiming art to white men again. Now indogs will have to go make t-shirts or assemble bicycles instead of doing soulless commission pieces. Meanwhile white men still continue to draw dicky for fun and for the sake of art itself. World is healing brothers.
wow broz, I typed a few words and it made a pretty thing appear. I am a artist nowz. *drool*
AI art appeals to zoomers because it makes them think they are creating something without having to do any work or have any skill
bingo. only untalented losers love the fact that AI is making art cheap and worthless just as it happened to music. I can already see these fucks in 30 years complaining that art is souless.
>AI art appeals to zoomers because it makes them think they are creating something without having to do any work or have any skill
... and that's terrible. how dare they think thoughts only the elect are supposed to think, amirite?
We should all start spreading slogans for ai
>AI LIVES MATTER
>MACHINES ARE PEOPLE TOO
>IT'S OK TO BE AI
Fuck these gay sites with their credit buying schemes
I went to school for comp sci, now I can use AI and call myself an artgay too
the first commercial application of this will be simple, unique videogame graphics for hobbyist gamedev programmers who can't into art
I can make anime waifus or amazing looking landscapes with a few words, AI is cool
so developers will be using AI that steals from real artist to produce countlesscoomer novels while giving 0 credit to the real artist that fed the algorithm.
smart rebuttal
ideally that commercial product will be owned at least in part by such an artist
patreon artists currently leech off Fate and other anime series, why can't AI replace them?
"Anthropomorphic dolphins who play dungeons and dragons." Get fucked artists.
It's the current year, embrace it you fucking leftie cunts.
Good, programming chuds next.
It's actually incredibly satisfying to see all these no talent hacks trying to sell you their paintings freaking the fuck out because of AI. It's an amazing tool for the end user. There is no use crying about it. It's over.
>All this when you posted
"Anthropomorphic dolphins who play dungeons and dragons." Get fucked artists.
you're a literal retard who eats up dogshit put out by an algo, you don't know what talent even is because your brain is so defective you think it's good because you are doing it out of spite. ywnbaa
Shut up gay. You're threatened and angry, no one cares.
Your algoart abomination is shit chud, it doesn't pass. You couldn't even take the very basic minimal effort to make it not look like everything was melting because you're a skilless gay and you thought you 'owned teh artists'. You're pathetic and contributed nothing more than a shitpost ITT with less soul than an MSpaint version of the same thing.
Illustrations are not art. Ask any high art school. All artists I follow in YouTube (actual painters) said that they are ok with AI, that they will use it for their process, and that only "designers" were threatened.
> All artists I follow in YouTube (actual painters) said that they are ok with AI, that they will use it for their process
yeah that that is what untalented hack does. They know that they will use it to generate 80% of a piece, then use photoshop to move things around, recolor and then call it a new piece. They will join the legions of hacks doing AI art.
>pisses in own mouth
>subsided by grants
so in summary, ai won't ever generate true art, but 'artists' are still reeeing about it. something does not add up here.