is a buzzword and if you understood the meaning of the word intelligence you would comprehend that fact. sadly cum gulping morons today will just go on and repeat trending buzzword around the clock without regard of meaning what they are saying. it is truly sad how even low iq beings are willingly lowering their iq even further by using language that separates them from animals as tools they are with only purpose being creating a buzz for smarter iq humans that have invested billions in the same buzzword and now need people talking about it to artificially inflate its value. what you call ai is nothing but an algorithm and there is not anything intelligent about it, no matter how hard you try to twist the world intelligence, change its definition and boundaries, it will never be a real intelligence.
Mhmm that's cool and all, but mentioning IQ whilst also posting coomer content and giving other retards sauce (rather than doing reverse lookups for images) goes to show that you're just referring to yourself. No self respecting man has pornographic content waiting to be uploaded. Thus your opinions are null.
>the language model can't flawlessly handle every single question asked of it and doesn't serve every possible use case I can think of, therefore it is completely useless
we need a snappy term for this retarded gay fallacy
This is the central point I think. The model has been trained to manipulate syntax, but it does not - nor can it ever - understand semantics, since computers have no qualia. Searle‘s Chinese Room is a good analogy.
Having to verify its output every time because it will and can simply make shit up does render it useless in practice. If I wanted random shit that is often just false I could also make BOT my chatgpt.
I ask AI to solve children's riddles. Then I ask it to solve equally challenging children's riddles, but from the soviet union. It fails miserably - because it didn't know those already.
Artificial memorization is a more fitting name, as of right now.
Wait... if you can create a bijection between the natural numbers and the rational numbers (which is necessary for rational numbers to be countable), why can't you create a bijection between a line and a plane?
You can trivially make a bijection from a line to a plane (ie f: R -> R^2). That's the point. ChatGPT doesn't understand that and spits out unrelated nonsense.
is a buzzword and if you understood the meaning of the word intelligence you would comprehend that fact. sadly cum gulping morons today will just go on and repeat trending buzzword around the clock without regard of meaning what they are saying. it is truly sad how even low iq beings are willingly lowering their iq even further by using language that separates them from animals as tools they are with only purpose being creating a buzz for smarter iq humans that have invested billions in the same buzzword and now need people talking about it to artificially inflate its value. what you call ai is nothing but an algorithm and there is not anything intelligent about it, no matter how hard you try to twist the world intelligence, change its definition and boundaries, it will never be a real intelligence.
who
xxapple_e
filtered
Mhmm that's cool and all, but mentioning IQ whilst also posting coomer content and giving other retards sauce (rather than doing reverse lookups for images) goes to show that you're just referring to yourself. No self respecting man has pornographic content waiting to be uploaded. Thus your opinions are null.
self-respecting? you are a slave to women lmao
women will be replaced by porn and artificial wombs, they have no place in this world anymore
what a fucking gay you are
stop trying to be smart, idiot
>the language model can't flawlessly handle every single question asked of it and doesn't serve every possible use case I can think of, therefore it is completely useless
we need a snappy term for this retarded gay fallacy
conceptually retarded
alternatively:
>small shell script in human form
A human would say it didn't know, the computer answers incorrectly confidently.
right, which renders the model inappropriate for certain specific use cases
my beef is with morons who claim that makes it useless for anything
Things are never useless. My beef is with people claiming this will eclipse all white collar work in a few years.
it has the intelligence necessary to dig trenches but it's pretty useless for real work
Its designed to generate sentences that are grammatically correct.
It doesnt 'know' anything.
This is the central point I think. The model has been trained to manipulate syntax, but it does not - nor can it ever - understand semantics, since computers have no qualia. Searle‘s Chinese Room is a good analogy.
Was it was the humans that didn't stop at I don't know who figured shit out?
Having to verify its output every time because it will and can simply make shit up does render it useless in practice. If I wanted random shit that is often just false I could also make BOT my chatgpt.
nirvana fallacy
I ask AI to solve children's riddles. Then I ask it to solve equally challenging children's riddles, but from the soviet union. It fails miserably - because it didn't know those already.
Artificial memorization is a more fitting name, as of right now.
>the "artificial intelligence" is actually naturally retarded
fuck off retard
intelligence lives in non euclidian coordinates
I have no idea what any of those means.
>coordinates are not indefinitely small, therefore
>a line has less coordinates than plane
AI confirmed to be pretty based.
Wait... if you can create a bijection between the natural numbers and the rational numbers (which is necessary for rational numbers to be countable), why can't you create a bijection between a line and a plane?
You can trivially make a bijection from a line to a plane (ie f: R -> R^2). That's the point. ChatGPT doesn't understand that and spits out unrelated nonsense.