>"artificial intelligence"

>"artificial intelligence"

  1. 7 months ago
    Βουκεφάλας στ Ἀλέξανδρος ὁ Μέγας

    is a buzzword and if you understood the meaning of the word intelligence you would comprehend that fact. sadly cum gulping morons today will just go on and repeat trending buzzword around the clock without regard of meaning what they are saying. it is truly sad how even low iq beings are willingly lowering their iq even further by using language that separates them from animals as tools they are with only purpose being creating a buzz for smarter iq humans that have invested billions in the same buzzword and now need people talking about it to artificially inflate its value. what you call ai is nothing but an algorithm and there is not anything intelligent about it, no matter how hard you try to twist the world intelligence, change its definition and boundaries, it will never be a real intelligence.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      who

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        xxapple_e

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      filtered

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mhmm that's cool and all, but mentioning IQ whilst also posting coomer content and giving other retards sauce (rather than doing reverse lookups for images) goes to show that you're just referring to yourself. No self respecting man has pornographic content waiting to be uploaded. Thus your opinions are null.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        self-respecting? you are a slave to women lmao

        women will be replaced by porn and artificial wombs, they have no place in this world anymore

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        what a fucking gay you are

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    stop trying to be smart, idiot

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the language model can't flawlessly handle every single question asked of it and doesn't serve every possible use case I can think of, therefore it is completely useless

    we need a snappy term for this retarded gay fallacy

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      conceptually retarded

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        alternatively:
        >small shell script in human form

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      A human would say it didn't know, the computer answers incorrectly confidently.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        right, which renders the model inappropriate for certain specific use cases
        my beef is with morons who claim that makes it useless for anything

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Things are never useless. My beef is with people claiming this will eclipse all white collar work in a few years.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          it has the intelligence necessary to dig trenches but it's pretty useless for real work

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Its designed to generate sentences that are grammatically correct.
        It doesnt 'know' anything.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is the central point I think. The model has been trained to manipulate syntax, but it does not - nor can it ever - understand semantics, since computers have no qualia. Searle‘s Chinese Room is a good analogy.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Was it was the humans that didn't stop at I don't know who figured shit out?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Having to verify its output every time because it will and can simply make shit up does render it useless in practice. If I wanted random shit that is often just false I could also make BOT my chatgpt.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      nirvana fallacy

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      I ask AI to solve children's riddles. Then I ask it to solve equally challenging children's riddles, but from the soviet union. It fails miserably - because it didn't know those already.

      Artificial memorization is a more fitting name, as of right now.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the "artificial intelligence" is actually naturally retarded
      fuck off retard

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    intelligence lives in non euclidian coordinates

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have no idea what any of those means.

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >coordinates are not indefinitely small, therefore
    >a line has less coordinates than plane
    AI confirmed to be pretty based.

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wait... if you can create a bijection between the natural numbers and the rational numbers (which is necessary for rational numbers to be countable), why can't you create a bijection between a line and a plane?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can trivially make a bijection from a line to a plane (ie f: R -> R^2). That's the point. ChatGPT doesn't understand that and spits out unrelated nonsense.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *