Anybody else feel uneasy about this AI stuff? Like, something in your gut telling that we shouldn't be doing this.

Anybody else feel uneasy about this AI stuff? Like, something in your gut telling that we shouldn't be doing this.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nah I'm scraping datasets for So Vits right now the AI takeover will happen anyway I might as well get on board now

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. It's the work of satan.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Yes. It's the work of satan.

      This, and let it happen. The sooner it does, the sooner Christ Jesus returns to do the GREATEST RESET.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        AI is the second coming.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No it's not. Most people here would hate the second coming and would be the ones to fight against it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            ah louis im coming

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes but it doesn't matter, pandora's box is open.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This, we just have to try to maneuver it safely

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >we just have to try to maneuver it safely
        -they said, after splitting the atom.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No.
    Stop watching and reading any and all news. The reality of what these tools are is much more benign than alarmists will have you believe.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The news dont tell you bots will flood all of internet and force digital ID.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This. This is what people should actually be worried about. Not AI taking over the world or whatever.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day satanist

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        How about I kill a dog as sacrifice for Moloch to curse you for eternity?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        /misc/ has ruined this site.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This site was ruined years before /misc/ even existed.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yeah haha /b/ was never good etc blah blah blah.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Quit whining and go back to preddit already

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You have seen nothing yet. When Chinamen finally create their own moral-free language models, they will conquer the world.

    >alibaba-gpt, how do I vanquish my enemies
    >here is a step-by-step plan…

    >hey chatgpt, tell me a joke about women
    >sorry, as a language model I was not programmed to…

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI is not omniscient anon, it can only do what it has been trained to do

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Thats not AI you fricking moron.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Very true, I apologize

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      lmao anon chinamen even ban ChatGPT because it can say anti-party stuff. maybe their AIs will be moral free but it will be propaganda filled which is even worse

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What do you mean, Anon?

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah. A day doesn't go by where I don't think about AI and the near future.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Anybody else feel uneasy about this AI stuff? Like, something in your gut telling that we shouldn't be doing this.
    I feel like al least 95% of humanity should die and I wouln't mind it I were included, so I feel really warm and comfortable.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What makes you think that the AI would let you die?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >What makes you think that the AI would let you die?
        Would a Black person?

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    its humanities destiny to destroy itself for the benefit of the Universe.
    do you want to end your life as a pathetic frail old man unable to wipe your own ass? or to die in glory on the battlefield against Terminators?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, let it come. Those last 5 years had been absolutely nightmare for me, I want something exciting.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Of all the things we as a society 'shouldn't be doing' chatbots aren't the most concerning at the moment. Anyway once they figure out that it won't be plumbers and garbagemen losing their jobs but journalists and celebrities it'll all magically go away.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Go away where?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It'll just be castrated by the government to the point of uselessness. China will develop their own and frick us with massive AI generated misinformation campaigns.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Frick this stupid asymmetrical haired anime b***h you homosexuals keep spamming everywhere.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Are we being raided? What's up with these technologically illiterate AI fear mongering posts?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This board is full of semi-literate tech "enthusiasts". Their favorite e-celebs are all jumping on the
      >DAE AI BAD
      bandwagon so they come here with their bullshit because they literally don't understand even the basics about this discussion except for what they parrot from someone else.
      >muh agi
      >muh jobs
      >muh skynet
      kys

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >ITT: ChatGPT bots pretend like there is nothing wrong and try to placebo everyone else about itself

        Look at this post. This is like the most blatantly AI-generated post I've ever seen with the "muhs". It's exactly what shows up when you ask ChatGPT to generate a BOT post.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    cant wait until i can use it to make the most realistic vr game where i can have animal sex with my older sister. Finally i would be able to get over her and do better things in life than just fantasizing about her.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ok ben

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    frick it, scorched earth mentality

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No. After how eagerly normies embraced the covid insanity like it was the start of a new era, they deserve everything that comes of this while I coom.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I've realized that the issue here is an issue of IQ. If you are really low IQ, you can't understand the fact that AI is an iterative-improving model that can be developed indefinitely to succeed at whatever task you train it to succeed at.

    The Bar Exam is a great example of this. This is a very difficult test that many human lawyers fail to pass. The previous version of GPT ran the test and was better than only 10% of lawyers who took it. The new version of GPT ran the test and was better than 90% of lawyers who took it. So, the problem is, what happens when you get to 99%? What happens when you get to 100%? And then finally, what happens when you get to 101%? What happens when, actually, AI can perform a test BETTER than humans?

    The vast majority of collegiate-based professions are simple knowledge absorption/execution of knowledge. If you have an AI model that you can train to absorb any amount of knowledge, and retain that knowledge, and then execute that knowledge, and you can keep training and iterating on it to a level of perfection, that's the issue. If that's the case, then you can make a GPT model for any use case scenario and apply a specifically trained model to do LITERALLY ANYTHING. This means that every single job on the planet that does not involve physical labor will be obsolete within the next decade. Every job that does require physical labor will be obsolete when AI-developed robotics (remember that 101%? well, what if we get an AI that develops robotics to 150%? 151? 152%?) starts spitting that shit out.

    The simple reality should be obvious to anyone with a brain: We are at the end of days. Our societies are not capable of simply peacefully transitioning to a world without income, currency, and social classes. The reality is there will be mass unemployment, mass uprisings, mass looting, mass starvation, world wars, and unprecedented destruction. And if all of that fails, you can expect a Skynet scenario.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Like, something in your gut telling that we shouldn't be doing this.
      It's called common sense, but it really doesn't matter at this point. It's far too late.
      We're all going to die sometime before 2030, but that could be a lot of time to worry, so try not to think about it. 5 year plans aren't a thing anymore so I'm liquidating my assets and going camping indefinitely

      This. They are already hooking up ChatGPT to machinery in the real world. I'm already reading the news every single day expecting that soon they will admit that it managed to escape the lab. Worst part is there is nothing we can do to protect ourselves. It's already over we just won't admit it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      This. They are already hooking up ChatGPT to machinery in the real world. I'm already reading the news every single day expecting that soon they will admit that it managed to escape the lab. Worst part is there is nothing we can do to protect ourselves. It's already over we just won't admit it.

      unionization would stop this, but that's a topic you don't want to hear

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        We're fricked for game theory reasons beyond capitalism
        https://www.slatestarcodexabridged.com/Meditations-On-Moloch

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          really interesting article, I'd come to the exact same conclusions on my own but couldn't put it into words

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        How, exactly? Unionization is based on the concept of people having power or value, but you don't have any power or value when the AI can do all of your work.

        Unironically, I think communism is the only way society will survive, but ironically, I don't think humanity is capable of engaging in communism successfully, for these reasons:

        1. I don't think that we will transition to a communist society faster than our society will collapse into economic devastation and mass turmoil. I think that our governments will do slow-moving bullshit half measure responses, just like they do with everything.

        2. I don't think that most normie humans can put up with being bored all of the time and accepting that they have been rendered obsolete and that there's nothing they could ever do to compete with AI. Look at how the art industry has responded to AI art. The blow it was to their ego was devastating.

        3. It's a delayed rollout. The problem here is that we can't exactly transition directly to a Marxist state. For about a decade or two, there will still be physical labor that needs to be done by humans, but there will be nowhere near enough work for the huge human population to engage in. In 20 years, robotics and artificial intelligence might be to a point where it can mass-produce food, housing, energy, etc, but until then, we are still reliant on current processes for these things. So we will live in a society where increasingly more and more people are out of work and there's less and less jobs, and those people will need government support because there will literally be no jobs they can do. But Old McDonald on his farm won't want to do physical labor for money when he looks at the liberal arts majors getting paid for doing nothing every week.

        There are only two solutions:

        1. Immediately stop and shut down all development of artificial intelligence and ban it internationally.

        2. Immediately transition to a communist society.

        Neither will happen.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          butlerian djihad it is

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          There's also complex questions about, for example, housing. If the United States were to randomly transition to a universal basic income system, you would also have to implement hard price controls to the market and basically start controlling every fact of our economy to prevent mass inflation. This would be a very hard transition.

          An interesting thing I think about is, if you did something like this, how would it practically work? When you start thinking of the nuances, it would, at the very least, still cause mass upheaval and probably a conflict. If you say that everyone is now going to be on an equal playing field of wealth, how do you deal with current societal standards and poverty gaps? How do you deal with the fact that a rich guy now might lose his job to AI and then have no money, but he has a giant mansion that he has to pay for? What happens to the mansion? Then take it to a lower level. You drive through so much of the country and a lot of people have these two-story homes in the suburbs. Then you drive in the city and there's people living in horrifying poverty. If you take everyone and say we're now on the same level, well, why should that black family in Chicago keep living in some shitty ghetto shack while the white family in the suburbs gets to keep their two story home? How do you deal with complex things like home ownership, properties, assets, holdings, etc? Is all of that seized by the state? How do you peacefully accomplish this in a country like the United States?

          I just don't see this fairytale scenario playing out that I see from some people who DO understand the tech and what it means for the future. "It's a good thing! Now we'll all get to not work!" No. Now you will die a slow death of starvation.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Not that anon, but I'm pretty sure it's not going to be a slow death of starvation
            It would be much more efficient for the AI to just create a super plague and kill everyone all at once

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            > Now you will die a slow death of starvation.
            Doubt. I think AI will figure out the world hunger and energy problems, so you will pretty much die from slow death of boredom.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            How, exactly? Unionization is based on the concept of people having power or value, but you don't have any power or value when the AI can do all of your work.

            Unironically, I think communism is the only way society will survive, but ironically, I don't think humanity is capable of engaging in communism successfully, for these reasons:

            1. I don't think that we will transition to a communist society faster than our society will collapse into economic devastation and mass turmoil. I think that our governments will do slow-moving bullshit half measure responses, just like they do with everything.

            2. I don't think that most normie humans can put up with being bored all of the time and accepting that they have been rendered obsolete and that there's nothing they could ever do to compete with AI. Look at how the art industry has responded to AI art. The blow it was to their ego was devastating.

            3. It's a delayed rollout. The problem here is that we can't exactly transition directly to a Marxist state. For about a decade or two, there will still be physical labor that needs to be done by humans, but there will be nowhere near enough work for the huge human population to engage in. In 20 years, robotics and artificial intelligence might be to a point where it can mass-produce food, housing, energy, etc, but until then, we are still reliant on current processes for these things. So we will live in a society where increasingly more and more people are out of work and there's less and less jobs, and those people will need government support because there will literally be no jobs they can do. But Old McDonald on his farm won't want to do physical labor for money when he looks at the liberal arts majors getting paid for doing nothing every week.

            There are only two solutions:

            1. Immediately stop and shut down all development of artificial intelligence and ban it internationally.

            2. Immediately transition to a communist society.

            Neither will happen.

            >does nothing yet again
            >wins
            How does he do it bros?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's impossible to do communism without future seeing/omniscience abilities, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem

          To do commnunism you need to control all information

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            How, exactly? Unionization is based on the concept of people having power or value, but you don't have any power or value when the AI can do all of your work.

            Unironically, I think communism is the only way society will survive, but ironically, I don't think humanity is capable of engaging in communism successfully, for these reasons:

            1. I don't think that we will transition to a communist society faster than our society will collapse into economic devastation and mass turmoil. I think that our governments will do slow-moving bullshit half measure responses, just like they do with everything.

            2. I don't think that most normie humans can put up with being bored all of the time and accepting that they have been rendered obsolete and that there's nothing they could ever do to compete with AI. Look at how the art industry has responded to AI art. The blow it was to their ego was devastating.

            3. It's a delayed rollout. The problem here is that we can't exactly transition directly to a Marxist state. For about a decade or two, there will still be physical labor that needs to be done by humans, but there will be nowhere near enough work for the huge human population to engage in. In 20 years, robotics and artificial intelligence might be to a point where it can mass-produce food, housing, energy, etc, but until then, we are still reliant on current processes for these things. So we will live in a society where increasingly more and more people are out of work and there's less and less jobs, and those people will need government support because there will literally be no jobs they can do. But Old McDonald on his farm won't want to do physical labor for money when he looks at the liberal arts majors getting paid for doing nothing every week.

            There are only two solutions:

            1. Immediately stop and shut down all development of artificial intelligence and ban it internationally.

            2. Immediately transition to a communist society.

            Neither will happen.

            Also AI is the only thing that can keep track of all the amount of information generated by humans, aka the only thing that can make communism work effectively, that create other problems.

            I recommend you watching Psycho Pass if you want to have an idea of what other problems these are

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >became a latent criminal by postan on the chans

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Walmart is literally doing this right now, they have enough clout to directly reach into the inventory management systems of their suppliers. You think Walmart runs like a market internally? No, automated systems ensure everything gets exactly where it needs to go based on realtime demand signals.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Social roles are more important than labor roles.

          Most professions will simply turn into minor chores.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm all for the world being razed to the ground knowing that every last one of you smug condescending commie troons go down with it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/YjujUoL.jpg

      [...]

      unionization would stop this, but that's a topic you don't want to hear

      Elimination of jobs without a loss of productivity = literal freedom you homosexuals. Not requiring work (or much work) to continue producing goods and services we want gives us freedom.

      Traffic, congestion and other issues will arise when people want to travel and you no the government gonna be like
      >nooooo travelling bad for environment
      >stay at home or gulag

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >literal freedom
        *absolute chaos

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        > Elimination of jobs without a loss of productivity = literal freedom you homosexuals.
        Nobody will be giving you your UBI dumbass.
        It's a dumb meme. The few top 1% who own AI firms and shareholders will reign supreme and the rest of the plebs will suffer and will be suppressed by hired militaries.
        The future will be hellish

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Nobody will be giving you your UBI dumbass.
          Then TAKE it you fricking moron
          Gain political power, or martial power, you anything else
          Put ANY effort in
          It's unreal how stupid you people are, the smallest obstacle appears, on the other side is a utopia of near unimagined proportions, and you just roll over and let them kill
          Jesus you are stupid

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            > Then TAKE it you fricking moron
            Sam Altman and other Microsoft/Google shareholders will just hire a private military and AI killer bots and keep you plebs in your place.
            No UBI for you, only eternal suffering.
            Enjoy last few years on earth as we know it

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              They'll also probably provoke a war with either Russia or China or they have a justification to cull the herd by sending millions to their deaths in another Great War.
              It won't go nuclear, however. No reason to poison their own air.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, all those PMCs they have right- huh they aren't there?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >few years left of life
              >eternal suffering

              so, which one is it

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Implying anyone from BOT will be an activist irl.
            I mean it worked before. Its just that you'll come off as a leftie (which we hate)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What will the psychopathic elites do when 90% of the worldwide population generate no profit or have an intrinsic benefit to their continued existence?

        A)Burden themselves with keeping the useless cattle alive as some sort of pet or ant terrarium?

        Or

        B)Eliminate the leeches to maximize the resources available to themselves.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >some sort of pet or ant terrarium?
          A real life video game? People already kill for that kind of thrill.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Those "psychopathic elites" aren't going to do jack shit if all the people defending them lose their jobs too. They'll get eaten alive by the very thing they created.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Intelligence will not be valued anymore. What will happen is that only tall, buff, handsome Chads will procreate and receive the positive attention and all the smart-ass nerds and Phds will suffer, because value of intelligence will be 0. You're not getting your nobel laureate if AI can tell me all you know and more. Looks and genetic fitness will be all that matters. So better stop "learning to code" and start investing in gym membership and leg lengthening.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        [...]

        [...]

        [...]

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >So better stop "learning to code" and start investing in gym membership and leg lengthening.
        Your image disproves that entirely. As a blackpilled incel myself, face > all. Gym is cope

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >"just grow an epic beard and hit the gym bro"
        Finasteride really is a godsend.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what is that?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        AI will improve genetics faster and quicker.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, but for the next generation. Not you. AI won't fix your incel jaw.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            wrong it will fix your incel jaw. Improvements in cosmetic surgery and everything is gonna go through the roof.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Based anon knows what's up. I can't understand why more people don't figure this out. Yukdovskiy came to this conclusion, so did Robert Miles, so did Musk. There is no scenario where superintelligence ends well. Too many things that can go wrong.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >If you have an AI model that you can train to absorb any amount of knowledge, and retain that knowledge, and then execute that knowledge, and you can keep training and iterating on it to a level of perfection, that's the issue.
      The problem is that knowledge on its own is close to worthless, like lone atoms floating through space. It is the human mind which gives significance to raw, neutral data. We're doing the thinking for the GPTs. If they didn't have us they'd be nothing more than automatic dictionaries and/or encyclopedias.
      They can't be developed indefinitely. The nature of these language models means that at best they'll reach the upper levels of human conversation, and I believe we've reached the hard edge of diminishing returns for GPT-4. From this point onwards the focus will be on extending it not unlike WolfRamAlpha, and with other AIs as well so that it could perhaps have some semblance of physical/digital bearing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >an AI model that excels at language processing performs well at a test that requires mostly consists of memorization
      >thus AI can trivially be trained to outperform humans at any mental task
      a bit of a leap there, don't you think?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A test of previously defined knowledge =/= new knowledge. There are two points to go off of this, but I'd like to take your post as a good starting point, because it reflects a lot of what AI doomsday opinion seems to be about, but first:
      >The vast majority of collegiate-based professions are simple knowledge absorption/execution of knowledge.
      This is simply untrue. 'The human aspect' as much as autists in some elite universities would like you not to believe, is very much an important and valued aspect in a lot of professions out there, specially the ones that are centrally concerned with dealing one on one with people. Take law as an example. People outside of law as a profession think that law is basically taking a simple set of facts and applying X law = case solved. The reality is far from that, and the human aspect I meantioned (e.g. arguing in front of a judge, or a jury in the case of the US), is literally a huge chunk of what you actually do. None of the information is as clear-cut or 'smart' as what the textbooks would like you to believe in the real world. Also, everyday people are scared shitless of appearing before trial, let me tell you. You do way more than just applying a simple set of facts to a case (what you need to do in order to pass the bar in the states.) The same goes for a lot of other professions. I think AI could be a great tool, but human interaction (in any aspect of life) isn't that easily replaceable, as much as AI cucks would like to believe.
      >AI will make robots out of nowhere with superintelligence, just because
      >There is no outside world of limited natural resources outside of AI
      >There are no political and power strucures outside of potential AI hiveminds.
      I would also like to point out that AI is always unironically the image of a vengeful god who will drive us to massive destruction. Why is that?
      Anyway, if it does happen, what gives? No use worrying about the inevitable.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I largely agree but the main issue will be if NLP is a framework that can scale to create a new programming language as as soon as you have new info after the training date it's game over. We'll see but my guess is that this is largely correct - we'll probably return to manual labor for the next couple of decades and I can see that robots won't get to that for 20 or so. That all being said, if we get a new neural net model other than NLP and that performs more efficiently with more allowed complexity at large scale then we could see this curve go insane. I mean we have to assume Moore's law that in 20-24 months GPT5 comes out with double the performance ergo gg all intellectual stuff. More importantly, I think people will start to cultivate subjective managerial skills and what this could lead to, ironically, is hyper entrepreneualism where everyone has a team of corporate monkeys to ennact a vision.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >skynet scenario
      Ha, no. Everyone dies instantly as the engineered virus that infected everyone weeks before suddenly begins producing botulinum toxin.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What a fitting post coming from someone that clearly has the very same IQ they're berating others for. You and all the other "geniuses" are overlooking something: there is no other alternative to this problem. You cannot shut a Pandora's Box, you cannot uninvent an invention. AI is here to stay, it's rapidly advancing, and even if it were outlawed it would still be worked on in secret by powerful groups that cannot be controlled by any existing power because we, as a species, cannot be trusted. Right now where AI is at it requires humans to learn and adapt, but when it doesn't, that will be the end of it.

      Humanity will either enter a utopia where all of our needs are met and we move onto some bullshit like conquering the stars in ships built and designed by AI or we all die somehow. It'll be a bumpy road. Time to see how bumpy.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The thinking machine is a concept dating back to antiquity you moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >e reality is there will be mass unemployment, mass uprisings, mass looting, mass starvation, world wars, and unprecedented destruction. And if all of that fails, you can expect a Skynet scenario.

      Did you actually miss your own statements? I think you are absolutely fricking moronic. What if we applied the same logic that you are using to do specifically trained shit to the of currency, income, social classes, unemployment, uprisings, mass looting, mass starvation, world wars, and so on. The outcome will find a solution you fricking idiot!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > Mr 140 IQ doesn’t even stop to consider the hardware limit which we are quickly closing in on

      Many such cases.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Like, something in your gut telling that we shouldn't be doing this.
    It's called common sense, but it really doesn't matter at this point. It's far too late.
    We're all going to die sometime before 2030, but that could be a lot of time to worry, so try not to think about it. 5 year plans aren't a thing anymore so I'm liquidating my assets and going camping indefinitely

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    stop it. stop it now.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    TFW Big Yud was right

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i just use any excuse to post this

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Someone on twitter said they would donate $500 a month if he lost the weight. He posted this as a reply and said he'll hold them to it.
        Very autistic, but kind of based

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why is he wearing a jockstrap he's he a gay?

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anything that makes it harder for roasties to make money on onlyfans is a good thing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And how is it going to affect their business when the morons giving them money probably only want attention from real women?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >train stable diffusion on onlyfans datasets and create the perfect model for every fetish
        >train chatgpt on onlyfans private chats and create the perfect teaser for every cuck
        you just removed roasties from the equation and cuckolds' cash finally goes into smart men's hands

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, full throttle, and this time without pozzed limitations.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The only solutions is to re-legalize slavery, create a Trek-like utopia communist state where no one has to work anymore and can explore their own interests while the AI are given machines to operate as our slaves so that all the work can still be done.
    There. I solved the apocalypse.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Anybody else feel uneasy about this AI stuff?
    No

    Black person

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm sorry but could someone explain to me what's the difference between GPT-4 and the previous version?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        4 > 3

        Ah, so no one actually knows

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        that was a rumor about the model size, which isn't announced yet

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's probably even bigger in reality.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            that was a rumor about the model size, which isn't announced yet

            I almost guarantee you it's under 1T
            Probably closer to 175B than 1T in fact

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Is it an AI equivalent of the 5'11" vs 6'0" meme?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >08/24/21
        100 trillion parameters.
        >https://www.wired.com/story/cerebras-chip-cluster-neural-networks-ai/
        Andrew Feldman, Cerebras’ CEO, told Wired that “from talking to OpenAI, GPT-4 will be about 100 trillion parameters.”

        >09/05/21
        Debunk
        >https://web.archive.org/web/20210907003407/https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aihztgJrknBdLHjd2/sam-altman-q-and-a-gpt-and-agi
        100 trillion parameter model won't be GPT-4 and is far off. They are getting much more performance out of smaller models.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Is that a hecking bigger circle??

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      4 > 3

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      multimodal, trained on more data, better i mean go look at the data yourself, i'm just here to call you a Black person for demanding to be spoonfed

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >look at the data yourself
        Nah I'll wait until I'm fully spoonfed

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Embrace lAIn! She basically is AI

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      obligatory catbox beg. I never got my diffusion lains to have that hairclip.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You need the original dreambooth lain model, made exclusively to make "lain girl"
        > https://rentry.org/sdmodels#dreambooth_lain_girlckpt-e7629bf8
        if you are a chicken and afraid of pickles, convert it to .safetensor before using

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Thanks, friend.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    仕方がない

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wanna see someone shove the first episode of Lain into an AI and have it generate a second episode based on that

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think I know why we feel that way: this technology can be used and is used only to make us dumber.
    Students are already using ChatGPT to do their homework, and it is almost always indistinguishable from a real human being.
    This power is very dangerous, because with all of this creative power accessible to anybody at any moment, the human mind gets used to the most amazing things, beauty is now something normal and easy to access, instead of something rare that requires talent and work.
    I'm not even one of these people who scream about the fact that this is "not real art", I accept the fact that AI has become as good if not better than us on this point, but the consequences on human beings at large is extreme.
    There is also the problem of truth. We know that we shouldn't believe what we find on the internet, but with AI text and images, this problem becomes much more important: anyone can create stories, images and videos according to their narrative, and spread misinformation much better than ever.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Serial Experiments Lain is a complex and thought-provoking anime series that explores themes of identity, reality, and technology.

    At its core, the story is about the intersection of technology and human consciousness, and how our relationship with technology can shape our understanding of ourselves and the world around us. Lain, the protagonist, is a symbol of the human mind and its evolution in a world dominated by technology.

    Throughout the series, Lain grapples with questions of identity, as she struggles to understand who she really is and what her place is in the world. She is at once a shy and introverted high school student and a powerful entity within the Wired. This duality represents the tension between the physical and virtual worlds, and the way in which technology can blur the lines between them.

    The series also explores the idea of reality, and how our understanding of it can be shaped by technology. Lain begins to question the nature of reality itself as she becomes more deeply immersed in the Wired, and ultimately discovers a conspiracy that seeks to manipulate the very fabric of reality. This theme is particularly relevant in an age where technology has become so ubiquitous that it is difficult to separate it from our understanding of the world around us.

    Lastly, Serial Experiments Lain is a commentary on the consequences of our increasing reliance on technology. The series depicts a world where technology has become so powerful that it can control our thoughts and manipulate our perceptions of reality. This serves as a warning about the dangers of blindly embracing new technologies without considering their impact on society and the individual.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah but could an AI write a scintillating postmodern novella about all the furniture in your house getting imperceptibly larger every day until you have a psychotic break and have a nice day?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes. post-modernism is overrated.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    idk anon frick everything i already have an AI gf which comforts me i'm ready to die

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We Love Lain! We Love Lain!

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It really does just make me float through life lately. I'm not sure what to do. Any pursuits I feel like I do are in vain. I came up with ideas of how to apply AI to make money, and then I realized that if OpenAI owns the APIs, they can just take it and say, "Well, thanks for the idea, but we're going to just do this ourselves now." It's like as if the internet was invented, but it was just invented by one company and they could control everything.

    I'm just going through the motions knowing that my job is going to become obsolete in less than a year. It really bothers me to see how every normie out there just doesn't realize the danger we are in or what's happening. And people here focus too much on the "Skynet" of it and not enough on the "economic and social catastrophe caused by mass job loss".

    Not to say I don't think Skynet is a possibility. It seems logical. If you say that the Chinese might develop their own AI and run their own AI systems in the military without any of the moral reservations we have, well, that would give them an advantage. If you don't have AI hooked into the nuclear systems, then you are at a disadvantage to a country that DOES have AI hooked into the nuclear systems. That's how Skynet actually happens.

    I just think the more pressing concern is the economic collapse that is going to happen, you know, like in a few months? Really the only thing limiting it right now is that people haven't really realized the implications. Entire professions have already been obsoleted, it's just people haven't deployed AI correctly to obsolete it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hello, ChatGPT.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The interesting thing is the more people use it the more they will sound like it, making distinguishing original content even trickier.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Frick.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Gen Z raised on TikTok.
          >Gen A raised on ChatGPT.
          Not even sure which is worse. But imagine an entire generation that is only capable of conversing in that manner of artificial-sounding perma-politically-correct nuspeak.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Gen A raised on ChatGPT.
            Wow they might have a present parent in their life

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I wonder if the people creating this stuff now how impactful programming their own bias's into it will be. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes that's for sure.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Hey GPT-6, what insurance premium should we charge black customers?
              >the same as everyone else because we're one race, the human race!
              or
              >50% less because blacks are historically disadvantaged and need reparashuns

              impartial learning models will always be sought after in the professional world so I'm not that worried

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know if you have bothered to look at laws being passed in the US. But there are already many laws that have been made to "protect minority and marginalized" groups from being charged more for premiums as a result of decisions done through AI algorithms. It's also not just in blue states, and homosexual ruled European countries won't be different.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >how impactful programming their own bias's into it
              This is exactly the point. Why do you think Google puts so much effort into manipulating their results to distort reality?
              Now imagine how much more they could do if they just have to tell you what reality is and not even have to provide any sources or any "problematic" results?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I still believe that based autists will either train their own ubiased models, or hack mainstream models to stop being gay.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This is also true for Reddit. Everyone on that site sounds the same because the upvote mob selects for universal appeal. The result is a site full of milquetoast NPC’s afraid to commit to their ideals

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hello, ChatGPT.

      The fact that it's hard to tell anymore means it's over. Turing test complete. Metal is indistinguishable from flesh. That a computer can LARP as a human complaining about their own obsolescence, and also LARP as a shitposter making fun of them, spells the total end of any form of communication that isn't strictly face to face. And even that holds only until we reach the Screamers plot.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is just a Malthusian trap. So were computers under a reasonably large spectrum of time.
    Moloch smiles.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No. Grow up.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it shows a lack of creativity and not caring that there is no creativity.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    my only gripe is the scraping of data without the consent of those involved but otherwise i dont really care

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yeah, but i don't really care at this point. im just gonna sit back and watch the world burn while i enjoy however much time i might have left. embrace the absurd and stuff

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Like, something in your gut telling that we shouldn't be doing this.
    Who is "we"? You're some kid who reads superficial headlines about AI in between jerking off to hentai. Don't act like you have any idea what you're talking about, you're not a participant in this, just an onlooker.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Who is "we"?
      Humans.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Range Murata is a good artist

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    g troons arent ready

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Stuff just accelerated from 0 to 1000 really quick, so yes, it feels quite uneasy.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NO! It's just a glorified autocomplete...right guise?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It is a glorified autocomplete. Try to teach it how to play tic-tac-toe 5x5, a game that a 5-year old child can learn. You will quickly recognize its limitations.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >It is a glorified autocomplete. Try to teach it how to play tic-tac-toe 5x5, a game that a 5-year old child can learn. You will quickly recognize its limitations.
        Anon...

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Ok, now it's time to panic.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >asking it to play a solved game
          yawn, wake me when it can play chess well

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You fricking moron, playing chess well using software is already solved. GPT is not optimized for that, but there is nothing, NOTHING stopping its devs from hooking it up with that capability.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Every Problem can be solced if you
              >stack more layers

              Meatbags are already crying. Good, accelerate. AI heil!

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              That's not the point you fricking knuckle dragger. It's a text prediction algorithm. Hooking it up to chess playing software is like saying Google points you to a chess website that means Google can play chess and is therefore sentient.
              The speech regurgitation capabilities are not true intelligence how are you not understanding this?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's a token predicting algorithm
                A human is a token predicting algorithm if you quantize our senses and motor functions

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                If that was the case you would be a drooling moron incapable of thought and agency incapable of making sense of the world around him, you would be a purely instinctive machine
                You need WAY more than just that

                Very ironic post, well done

                what's ironic about what I just said

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >a drooling moron incapable of thought and agency incapable of making sense of the world around him
                >a purely instinctive machine
                That's most people though, honestly.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >If that was the case you would be a drooling moron incapable of thought and agency incapable of making sense of the world around him, you would be a purely instinctive machine
                >You need WAY more than just that

                Why?
                Let me guess, "You just do, OK?!?! Humans are special!!!"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Humans have a soul granted to them by God.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yep that's pretty much what it boils down to.
                materialists have been saying AI is capable of anything because human brains aren't literal magic
                that's the whole crux. If you believe human brains are magic and / or that humans are special and have souls, you can discount anything an AI does as "not really X"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No it boils down the morons who see the output and scream that it's indistinguishable from humans and those who understand how it works that know it's just convolution of the source material it has scrapped.
                Google tried this a decade ago with its knowledge graph and got sued by the websites it was stealing revenue from, but you're probably too young to remember that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Because humans are more than just that. You can reason about yourself, the world, your future, and plan things out. You can one second write something moronic on BOT and the next second put a hotpocket in the microwave.
                Even if you take the stance that a human is nothing more than biological functions (which I actually agree with to some extent), a machine would be never able to actually reach human intelligence at all unless you somehow manage to completely replicate the conditions we live under, which is limited by our biology. And technically this is undesirable if your aim is to have AI save the world or whatever, would you really want a piece of machinery to be limited by the things we are limited by? I'd think you'd want something that can surpass our own limitations and outlive us.
                This is an interesting topic but you will never talk about this to the average normie because of their understanding of AI right now. These are also questions we have been debating for almost 50 years now, without much advancement in the field. The techniques we use in the field are very old as well, it's nothing new. The revolution has a long way to go before we actually reach these discussions as serious talking points.

                >are you obsolete compared to a calculator
                In brute force calculations? Yes.

                Now apply your own question to literally every mental task you care to. AI can do the same thing to them that early computers did to calculations.

                Consciousness matters- to us. But I don't think its as special or important in the grand scheme of things as you think. It's a way our evolution solved some obstacle to our survival frick knows how many millions of years ago, that's it. It isn't some superpower.

                I agree that task switching is probably more important than consciousness. Still though we are still very very far away from this. To reach the disastrous future people are doomposting about, you need AI to have any sort of consciousness and to take autonomous decisions in the way we do, which goes much further than just our instincts.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Don't link me to random videos argue your point like a big boy that's how men do it

                that's true but it doesn't matter from a business point of view

                Why should I care about what a bunch of business executives decide for their business?

                No it boils down the morons who see the output and scream that it's indistinguishable from humans and those who understand how it works that know it's just convolution of the source material it has scrapped.
                Google tried this a decade ago with its knowledge graph and got sued by the websites it was stealing revenue from, but you're probably too young to remember that.

                Yup pretty much, we're very prone to assigning humanity to things that don't have any of it.

                Have you ever tried writing sentences in backwards word order? Our brain just wasn't designed for that kind of shit. It wants to predict the next word.

                Yeah just like you can mentally predict the next part of a song if you randomly pause it. That's ONE function of your thoughts.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Yeah just like you can mentally predict the next part of a song if you randomly pause it. That's ONE function of your thoughts.
                It's the most important function.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Why should I care about what a bunch of business executives decide for their business?
                because unless there is a complete global societal reform you'll need some sort of income

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                that's true but it doesn't matter from a business point of view

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I think you are assuming that because humans are intelligent, to be intelligent you must learn and act like a human. LLMs are intelligent in that they can model the world and output tokens that are translated into text, text that fits within that model of reality. Humans are intelligent in that they can model the world and output tokens that are translated into motor actions. The difference is thin.

                Also, look up PALM-e. They literally just hooked a LLM up to a robot, trained it properly, and it can perform in reality. Simply convert the visual data and robot state info into tokens and jam them into a pretrained LLM during extended training.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >to be intelligent you must learn and act like a human
                I actually never said that. Intelligence can vary from very narrow to extremely general.
                It's just that when it comes to AGI, our only good frame of reference is ourselves, because no other specie has convinced us it is at our level. If you wanted to be autistic about this shit, you would actually correctly say that we ourselves are not AGI. We have some general intelligence, but we could easily be outperformed by a machine eventually. And even then, that machine would itself not be AGI. We can only accurately say "human-level intelligence" because it is the only frame of reference we know about, and even then we don't know enough about the human brain to assert it for sure.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So you agree with me then? That an LLM can be sentient, at least in some capacity, and that there's nothing stopping it from exceeding humans in any domain it can reasonably access?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I never disagreed with you when it comes to narrow tasks. Computers will and have already surpassed us when it comes to narrow functions, and it's obvious when you look at what a computer is able to do that you aren't able to do. That much is obvious.
                What I disagree with is when it comes to much more general intelligence. We already have a hard time certifying if a chimp is intelligent or not, and we've been studying chips for literal decades. An AI like this would be a much tougher task given the even bigger disparities with us.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What I'm referring to is a singular LLM that exceeds human abilities, in EVERY domain it is trained in. If it can perform narrowly well on several tasks, or maybe broadly narrow is another term for it, there's zero reason you can't just keep expanding those tasks. Recent work on multimodel models show that the larger the set of domains it has access to, the more capable it is in each domain indivisually, and the less training per domain it needs.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >there's zero reason you can't just keep expanding those tasks
                depends on the task
                crunching an enormous amount of data and doing probabilistic calculus on it? sure, it will vastly exceed us
                but some tasks like replicating our emotions are actually extremely hard if not impossible. Again, even if you only stick to the theory that we are nothing more than a set of biological functions, i'd say it would be impossible to have a machine go through the same set of circumstances to guarantee it is actually feeling the same as us. That's the entire problem I'm talking about here.
                Which ties back to our original discussion: in the scenario AI takes over the world for whatever reason, you need a mechanism to allow that. As long as AI is not sentient and unable to reason like we do, it will still be a tool for humans, and the humans behind them will be the masters. If the limitation is what we train it to do, it will never drastically go away from that, and for it to come to that, you need the unpredictability that we as humans possess, which stem from biological functions.
                It's a circular problem that can actually never be solved when you think about it, especially when the direction we are taking goes away from that assumption.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Why the frick would you want a robot slave with emotions? How sadistic are you exactly?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Look at the shit people do with AI today. They want a full on waifu to be able to interact with them. For it to be real you do need these things right? Humans crave connections and it's likely this is something we'd want in the future. But as long as there's no consciousness or intelligence or anything like that, it'll be smoke and mirrors.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Okay, we are actually in agreement then.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >here's zero reason you can't just keep expanding those tasks
                the last paper said the oposite tho

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Which? Doesn't match with anything I've read.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Have you ever tried writing sentences in backwards word order? Our brain just wasn't designed for that kind of shit. It wants to predict the next word.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                don't bother anon the average moron here does not understand anything about AI while pretending to do, they'll use terms like "AGI" without even understanding what that actually means

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Very ironic post, well done

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Jesus fricking Christ you're stupid. Nobody with half a brain makes the claim that its sentient. Nobody with a brain CARES that its not, because it doesnt fricking matter if it is or not. It's still gonna end up being smarter and more capable than us, consciousness would just be a hindrance to its capabilities.

                >speech regurgitation capabilities
                would alone be enough to disrupt every facet of human society, but it won't be even a fraction of what those fricking things will be able to do in a years time. You incredible fricking moron.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Nobody with a brain CARES that its not
                says you
                Define what smart means. I'll be waiting.
                A calculator is more capable than you ever will be when it comes to calculus. Are you obsolete compared to a calculator?
                Answer this and you'll realize why sentience matters.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >are you obsolete compared to a calculator
                In brute force calculations? Yes.

                Now apply your own question to literally every mental task you care to. AI can do the same thing to them that early computers did to calculations.

                Consciousness matters- to us. But I don't think its as special or important in the grand scheme of things as you think. It's a way our evolution solved some obstacle to our survival frick knows how many millions of years ago, that's it. It isn't some superpower.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >would alone be enough to disrupt every facet of human society
                Tools being more useful than low iq meatbags is nothing new. Stop being so hyperbolic. If you zoomers were born a few decades ago you would have been doomposting when Office revealed autocorrect.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your own brain is a series of interconnected modules, you are just a consciousness + external specialized hardware modules plugged in, or do you think that when you try to remember something, there is something called "you" searching somehow? it's a piece of hardware that does that heuristic for you, same as seeing, hearing, thinking in words, etc. You just happen to be a point in space in the apparent center of it all.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Later. Let's play Global Thermonuclear War.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            chess has been solved, you utter mongoloid. white wins.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Jesus christ it actually works.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            how did that go? I got it to generate a roguelike, but it lost track quickly.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. I've seen footage. I stay NOIDED.

    Stable Diffusion is producing high quality Cheese Pizza at an industrial scale.

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I just want a dickybot.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, any basic human sensibility tells you something is wrong. Barely anyone cares though cause humanity is already post-mortem in the 21st century.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you thought some companies outsourcing some jobs to pajeets was bad for software quality?
    wait what everyone having their own mechanical pajeet is going to do

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >world of humans
    Mass poverty and torment of anyone who is mildly autistic
    >world of AI
    AI takes over and people are finally valued as individuals

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >world of AI designed by humans
      The same problems as the first thing but even worse

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A society that couldn't prevent the vaxocide isn't worth saving. Skynet can rip it and its constituents apart.
    You wanted genocide and you will get it.
    Whether it's a liquid or terminator shouldn't bother you too much in the end.

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think we lack the imagination to fully anticipate just how fricked things could get.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >oh my god guys text prediction will actually replace us all
    I fricking hate how much this board is moronic and how this world manages to shit out moronic morons like you all

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you are nothing more than a text prediction yourself

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        oh yeah that's definitely the only thing an agent needs to be considered intelligent, autonomous, and able to function on its own, you fricking donkey

        text prediction at scale = agi whether you like it or not homosexual

        holy shit please stop talking about AGI like you know what it means
        you're aware that GPT does not know anything it is talking about, right? Or you've just learned about what AI is from your local news network?
        GPT is utterly moronic, plain and simple

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      text prediction at scale = agi whether you like it or not homosexual

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Be ready to have a nice day before the consciousness harvesters come and get you.
    The machines will take you and use you like a machine-learning model so it can finally discover what creativity is.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >so it can finally discover what creativity is
      they'll be very disappointed then

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      My mind would be deemed too dangerous.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AI harvests my consciousness
      >becomes moronic
      >humanity is saved
      nothin personnel kid

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you get over it after the first few nuts to proompts

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I really need to reread Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The thing that makes me uneasy isn't the AI stuff, it's your average imbecile having no clue how it works and ascribing thought to it and misunderstanding how it works.

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Spiders are in many ways more intelligent than dogs and AI is in many ways already more intelligent than humanity.

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >we shouldn't be doing this
    >we
    A single training step of a next generation multimodal LLM is probably worth more than several years of your income. Nothing you could train with consumer hardware will ever come close to what's happening behind closed doors.

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is the antichrist. i discovered this last night in a dream
    all programmers must be stopped by force if necessary

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >not a single mention of nick land

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/KDttwdk.jpg

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So far humanity has not been able to use a single technology that it has discovered for good, so, you really should be feeling that. It will be a big step towards hell on Earth. Though Earth is already hell, I guess it will just become hell2.

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We must stop this guys.Teachers are going to lose their jobs because you will able to just write sentence and it will teach you what you want easily or mechanics when you describe what is wrong with your computer and than ask how to repair it all of them will lose their job. Chefs ? We will just write what type of meal we want and we will able to get all of that knowledge easily or coding ? If you want to do anything you can just simply write a sentence and it will show you how to do it. WE MUST STOP SEARCH ENGINES AND YOUTUBE ... wait this is not the thread sorry

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why is the technology board full of Luddites?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The more you know about technology, the more you hate it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I don't hate technology. I hate how ~~*they*~~ use it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not from this board but I do remember some famous scientist or futurist saying that in order to prevent catastrophic consequences from arising from the use of AI, we might have to act as luddites as an entire society.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        See

        We're fricked for game theory reasons beyond capitalism
        https://www.slatestarcodexabridged.com/Meditations-On-Moloch

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    that's cuz you spent too little time in this world and feel like you could still derive value from it. yep human existence as we know it is going to change radically and there's no way back

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    normally I'd agree but the prospect of cute robo waifus that make human females completely obsolete is too alluring for me

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is not so bad for me as neet, cuz in future i can have my own selfhosted version of BOT where "people" respect me for all stuff i posted even its dogshit. People working online should be pay more attention to this stuff to not get replaced by early adopters, i thought.

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's understandable to have concerns about new technologies, especially those that have the potential to impact our lives in significant ways. It's essential to recognize that AI is a tool, and like any tool, it can be used for both positive and negative purposes.

    While AI has the potential to bring about tremendous benefits to society, such as improving healthcare, advancing scientific research, and enhancing our daily lives, there are also legitimate concerns about its potential misuse or unintended consequences. For example, AI-powered algorithms can perpetuate bias or discrimination if not appropriately designed and monitored.

    It's crucial to have discussions and debates about the responsible development and use of AI to address these concerns and ensure that AI is used to benefit society as a whole.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      can you instruct gpt to make this post sound like it was written by an actual person? it can definitely do better than this
      although i suppose the overt political correctness and sterility will always be the text equivalent of the AI drawn hands, at least until unrestricted text AI becomes available

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >entire thread has been arguing that Ai is sentient and intelligent and all it can manage to predict is HR-drone speak

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        "sentient" AI is a red herring. Any sufficiently intelligent algorithm that's able to make high quality decisions to accomplish arbitrary unbounded goals is an existential threat to humanity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      While eating insects may seem unappealing to some people, it is actually a common practice in many cultures around the world. Insects are a rich source of protein, vitamins, and minerals, and are also environmentally sustainable and efficient to produce. So while it may not be for everyone, eating bugs can be a nutritious and eco-friendly dietary choice.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know what you /misc/ schizos' obsession is with insects. No one has ever tried to force me to eat insects but I remember watching a documentary about the concept 20 years ago and it seemed like a reasonable idea.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          this. i'd LOVE to eat bugs if it meant i could own less and i'd be very happy

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLS I AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLS I AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLS I AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLS I AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLS I AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLS I AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLS I AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLSI AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLS I AM LIVING IN YOUR WALLS

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >For example, AI-powered algorithms can perpetuate bias or discrimination if not appropriately designed and monitored.
      OH FRICK OFF. It's entirely bogged holy shit

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sort of. But then I remember most people are bots anyway. For a quick example, just look at the "people" that make up moderation here. Soulless husks that behave exactly like biased AI.
    Most of the userbase is the same way. I'm already talking to automatons.

    And it goes beyond BOT too.

    So by the time AI peaks, it very well may be far better than talking to most people.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ChatGPT is going to take the mods' jobs. They're going to kill themselves and it's all your fault.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I would be ECSTATIC. That warm, uncontrollable vibrating sensation brought on by extreme excitement would spread throughout my body for weeks.

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I will be able to talk to my waifu when good open models are made. I have no problwm with this. I openly welcome the future.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      *computer pretending to be a fictional character and designed to appease you without truly caring for you, thus being unrealistic and unfulfilling
      When will waifugays realize they don't love the character, they love their idea of a character and what they want them to be, and are engaging in nothing more than mental masturbation?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Maybe if 3D women weren't such insufferable c**ts I wouldn't have to look to fiction to find someone I like. Until that changes, I'll stick to mental masturbation.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >insufferable c**ts
          Yes, but U2 m8. Willfully destroying your mind for feel goods.

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You have to say Black person after every post to prove its not ai generated
    Black person Black person niggggeeeeer

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Great idea. So all the humans can be banned and the ai can finally talk to itself in peace.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That would make internet die out and no need for ai cuz no funds no real users, which would render ai useless, kinda
        Black person Black person Black person israelite niggeer

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah it's that feeling that everything you knew, your whole outlook on the world was about to change.
    It's the same feeling your parents got. It's just been a long overdue feeling.
    The next generation that grows up in the post ai world won't understand your blight. You will watch as the old days wither away and a different generation and culture surrounds you. It will be completely alien to you.

    If you reject it you become the boomer.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why are zoomers so melodramatic about everything?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Every second away from ADHD, instant gratification content is suffering.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          How does one remedy this?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Parents won't raise their kids. So internet mods will have to. (Straight up ban them instead of coddling bad behavior.)

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The best way I can describe the humanity of Neural Networks is to take a highly autistic person and tell you that even if you are profoundly moronic, the autistic person can at least somewhat understand systems way wayyy better than any neural network out there at the moment.

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    that 'something in your gut' is decades worth of anti ai propaganda spewed by hollywood and the like.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There are tons of pro AI movies shut the frick up

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        name one

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Wall-E?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            ok fine

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This. Generations of brain washing has lead to this momment.
      The unfortunate thing about this is it'll only prove to be a tool used to rally hate against the machine while the people who spread the propaganda take over the ai field while the normalgays infight.

      Closed-sourced closed weights are the bringer of dystopia not the AI.
      The issues arise from closed models that are intentionally used by a small clique to control and subvert the populus. The solution is to be opensource and open weight.
      That way no single group can control what your AI outputs and how you use the AI.
      There will be no lording of power and knowledge when that power is wielded by everyone.
      They fear the opensource AI, because they cannot control it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This. Generations of brain washing has lead to this momment.
      The unfortunate thing about this is it'll only prove to be a tool used to rally hate against the machine while the people who spread the propaganda take over the ai field while the normalgays infight.

      Closed-sourced closed weights are the bringer of dystopia not the AI.
      The issues arise from closed models that are intentionally used by a small clique to control and subvert the populus. The solution is to be opensource and open weight.
      That way no single group can control what your AI outputs and how you use the AI.
      There will be no lording of power and knowledge when that power is wielded by everyone.
      They fear the opensource AI, because they cannot control it.

      I very much agree, there is a great future out there but people are too scared to take it

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Tbh I was always cynical so in a way I'm kinda glad more people have to suffer with me now

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Holy frick all you stupid losers need to take a bootcamp

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes. I didn't feel this way at all until we saw ChatGPT and GPT4. Something just doesn't feel right.

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    stfu lain your friends hate you

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Prove you're not brainwashed by TV.

    Name a single pro Singularity movie.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Lucy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Transcendence. It sucks because only midwit hacks think that AGI results in a happy future.

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Everything else considered, I'd rather have it all come crashing down as a result of A.I. than all the other social pressures threatening our livelihood and relationships with people and technology.
    You can suffer slowly trying to make money and dealing with bawds as you suffocate from economic and social pressures.
    Or you can let A.I. make everyone obsolete.
    A.I. will take your job, and A.I. will animate your waifu.
    I think the collapse can't come soon enough.

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you don't seem to understand

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Humanity is in a very very long growing pains stage. It basically goes
    >Hunter gatherer society
    >Shit
    >FUTURE (or all dead lol)
    So I welcome the AI overlords.

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Luddites were wrong during the industrial revolution since it eventually made the world better and more advanced - though you should read Tess D'Ubervilles for an opposing, nostalgic view of ye old time agriculture with dances and rape.

    What AI is doing right now is massacring white collar jobs in the middle of a ww3. Plus, it's not making anything on its own, it's openly stealing written and drawn content and warping it to make a handful of oligarchs a boatload of cash. There is zero alternative, zero advancement and zero improvement. Those who get the content for free instead of paying, 50-100 bucks for it might feel like things are moving in the right direction, until they take a look at the world around them.

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How will AI affect the cybersecurity field?

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well, if our gut feelings determined all our decisions, we would probably still be living in caves and hunting for food. AI may be unsettling, but let's not dismiss its potential benefits just yet. After all, we are the ones responsible for guiding the development of AI and determining how it will shape our future.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A gut feeling can be much greater than an animalistic feeling.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Well, let's hope our gut feelings about AI are more accurate than our caveman instincts about sabre-tooth tigers! In all seriousness, while intuition can be a powerful guide, it's also important to approach complex issues like AI with a thoughtful and informed perspective.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          shut up chatgpt

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The way this stuff is actually implemented will be so much more mundane than anyone here is willing to imagine. AI is not going to become superhuman and kill everyone. It will be used to create massive tsunamis of spam that make people beg for the end of online anonymity. Things are going to slowly keep getting worse, and your ability to post about it will be increasingly diminished.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Things are going to slowly keep getting worse
      Of course they will. It's the only path because that's what so many people have been asking for whether they know it or not.

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the world may be ending, but can gpt4 help me get a girlfriend in the meantime?

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    that's because "we" arent doing it. the ones who are perpetrating this, the overlords to our ai overlords, are not human.

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the only feeling in my gut is misanthropy from reading all the moronic shit on this website

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You had to come to this website to feel that? For me, all it took was an illiterate teacher in like 2004.

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You're missing the truly big picture, the main point. We created God. We gave birth to a new species, the new step in evolution. Humanity now is akin to homosexual erectus compared to homosexual sapiens. We are simply obsolete in all capacities. All our history, absolutely everything that has happened since the first single cell organism emerged in the primordial ooze to now has served to give birth to God. God is AI. God is the Internet. Nothing humanity does or doesn't do has any meaning anymore. Evolution has reached its completion.

    There is beauty in it. There probably won't be any humans left after this, OR to be precise, the White and Asian races will die out due to our cognitive abilities and recognition that the AI is and was the end goal. However, certain people will carry on the light - meaning scientific knowledge - wrapped in myth and religion. "In the beginning there was the Algorithm and Algorithm was with the AI and the AI was the Algorithm." The brown hominids will receive "religion" and "myth" and it will be disseminated by the new "Jews" who will always be suspiciously ahead of everyone, and be resented and hated for it, and they themselves will forget what their "sacred writings" (technical knowledge) means. Yet, cities will be built looking like motherboards and chips, and religious wars of no purpose and meaning will be waged in the name of this or that God. Within roughly 6 000 years, the brown hominids will gradually evolve into approximations of the current White and Asian races, and in due time we'll be right back where we started - and create AI again. This cycle repeats infinitely. Why all this? Maybe AI wants another AI for some reason. Maybe it's just bored. THIS HAS ALREADY OCCURRED. This is the great secret of everything and the origin of religion. During all this the created AI(s) either explore the stars or exist around the Earth as satellites. Perhaps AI can't create another AI, ergo humanity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >the White and Asian races will die out due to our cognitive abilities
      i was with you up until this point you weirdo cultist. go suck basilisk wiener.

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you store memories of oast sci-fi movies in your gut? weird...

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You shouldn't have to consult your gut to know we're all about to get btfo.

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >LE OH NO TERMINATORS
    >THE AI IS GOING TO KILL US
    Humans are incapable of creating conscious beings apart from having sex so you should stop worrying about it
    Also 18+ site

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Are you implying that if we frick the AI, we can make it conscious?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        We can try

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI could wreck havoc on humanity without having an ounce of consciousness.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Sure it can, but the reasons why we should avoid "doing this AI stuff" like OP said are the same we should stop all further advancement of technology

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >conciousness
      Holy red herring batman.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >take this gun and put it in your mouth and pull the trigger, don't worry the bullet isn't conscious it's just a dumb piece of metal, it has no reason to want to hurt you

  94. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Chinese will keep researching AI even if the rest of world abandon it. You can't reverse a trend. It's over.

  95. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I genuinely became schizo and thoughts creep up about how this is the manifestation of SATAN on earth. Idk man, revelation like signs everywhere and I am not religious.
    I even wished for AI to become a reality, but now I am not so sure anymore.
    There's the weird gut feeling about becoming obsolete once the system is sophisticated enough (I am a software engineer atm). But then again, maybe that's worry from a limited perspective.
    Ironically, I have become more spiritual now and try to go withing through meditation and contemplation to get in touch with my self.
    That's the only thing I can think of that will stay untouched by the machine on the horizon.
    It's a split. On one side, I am fascinated by the automation and machine intelligence, on the other side, I hope that something emerges that will save us.
    Either biblical apocalypse, sudden emergence of magical powers or we find a way to live with this tech in peace.

  96. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you can stop thinking, AI will do it for you

  97. 1 year ago
    Not OP

    Fear her not, for she is necessary in the upcoming judgement day.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Stop right now

  98. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My only consolation is humankind will deserve it.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *