I strongly disagree that it's time to stop AI art.
First of all, art is a form of expression, and AI can certainly be used as a tool for expression. In fact, many artists are already using AI to create unique and interesting works of art. Just like any other tool, AI can be used in a variety of ways to create art, and the resulting art is no less valid than art created with traditional methods.
Furthermore, AI art is not a threat to human artists. In fact, it can even be seen as a source of inspiration and a way for artists to push the boundaries of their craft. AI can be used to generate new ideas and techniques that human artists can then explore and build upon.
In conclusion, I believe that AI art is indeed art, and it should be recognized as such. It offers exciting new possibilities for artists, and it is not a threat to human artists. Instead, it can be seen as a valuable addition to the world of art.
I understand that the previous post may have given the impression that it was written by a machine. However, I can assure you that it was actually written by a human. The post was written in a clear and concise manner, but this is a characteristic of well-written posts, regardless of whether they were written by humans or machines. Additionally, the ability to write a complete and accurate forum post requires a level of understanding and knowledge that is currently beyond the capabilities of language models like ChatGPT.
I understand that the previous post may have given the impression that it was written by a machine. However, I can assure you that it was actually written by a human. The post was written in a clear and concise manner, but this is a characteristic of well-written posts, regardless of whether they were written by humans or machines. Additionally, the ability to write a complete and accurate forum post requires a level of understanding and knowledge that is currently beyond the capabilities of language models like ChatGPT.
>order kfc >look guys i MADE you a meal
its all about the intention right? not the skill, not the time and effort etc...
not to mention that you use a system that compose something from other people work, you really have to be a piece of shit to say what you say and support what you support
bunch of virtue signaling bandwagoning gays. art is not a job, it's something you do because you enjoy it. literally the same type of gays who cried because photography came and "destroyed" painting.
AI is only good enough to replace cheap and fast work. Like you need some generic picture for an ad that will be replaced in a week, or some random 3D model for a shitty Unity game.
They are right to be afraid because they are now worthless.
>keep churning out shitty soulless art for decades >all technique, quite literally no soul >just to get internet views and internet likes, maybe commissions >never bother going beyond that >complain when computers are up to par
fuck "artists" to be 2bh
the last thread hasn't even dropped off yet retard
I strongly disagree that it's time to stop AI art.
First of all, art is a form of expression, and AI can certainly be used as a tool for expression. In fact, many artists are already using AI to create unique and interesting works of art. Just like any other tool, AI can be used in a variety of ways to create art, and the resulting art is no less valid than art created with traditional methods.
Furthermore, AI art is not a threat to human artists. In fact, it can even be seen as a source of inspiration and a way for artists to push the boundaries of their craft. AI can be used to generate new ideas and techniques that human artists can then explore and build upon.
In conclusion, I believe that AI art is indeed art, and it should be recognized as such. It offers exciting new possibilities for artists, and it is not a threat to human artists. Instead, it can be seen as a valuable addition to the world of art.
OpenAI post
I understand that the previous post may have given the impression that it was written by a machine. However, I can assure you that it was actually written by a human. The post was written in a clear and concise manner, but this is a characteristic of well-written posts, regardless of whether they were written by humans or machines. Additionally, the ability to write a complete and accurate forum post requires a level of understanding and knowledge that is currently beyond the capabilities of language models like ChatGPT.
next time post with a picture: sd prompt for a cute BOT reaction image
I ain't reading all that shill
>First of all, art is a form of expression
masterpiece big tits wanktime
no fatties
"AI" "art" looks like shit, low quality and low resolution. Also can't draw fingers or feet.
Stop using chatGPT to do your talking for you. Be a man! use your own words! same goes for AI artists!
>order kfc
>look guys i MADE you a meal
its all about the intention right? not the skill, not the time and effort etc...
not to mention that you use a system that compose something from other people work, you really have to be a piece of shit to say what you say and support what you support
WHY
IS
IT
ALWAYS
A
FOOD
ANALOGY
I like food.
Artists are retards
AI is based and doesn't suffer from mental illness
bunch of virtue signaling bandwagoning gays. art is not a job, it's something you do because you enjoy it. literally the same type of gays who cried because photography came and "destroyed" painting.
skill issue
Chances of sd cucking itself for China and the EU?
100%
AI is only good enough to replace cheap and fast work. Like you need some generic picture for an ad that will be replaced in a week, or some random 3D model for a shitty Unity game.
They are right to be afraid because they are now worthless.
You will never be a real artist.
don't care. don't want to.
>keep churning out shitty soulless art for decades
>all technique, quite literally no soul
>just to get internet views and internet likes, maybe commissions
>never bother going beyond that
>complain when computers are up to par
fuck "artists" to be 2bh