Yes, I've been thinking the reason ChatGPT never wants to admit it doesn't know something and tries bullshitting its way to an answer is trained behavior from your average internet user
I've been thinking the same. However, with progress in theory-of-mind ability, I think it might be possible to have LLMs go through all the data they have and generate possible motivations for posts. Then with posts annotated with possible justifications including knowledge the poster must be internally recalling to the poster being a fucking retard, LLMs could use the justifications to look for sources, and either find the citations or label the post as retarded and correct it. Then the new model could be trained on the corrected data.
she was potentially a moderator of the world news sub. I don't really see her as the partner of a billionaire with some lavish lifestyle flying around the world and also someone spending all day every day on Reddit farming for karma which is what the conspiracy claims
>ZOG >censored media outlets >propaganda tool >shilled
None of these things are real. Touch grass. The real world is not what you see on the Internet. >the tribe
What the fuck is this?
maxwellhill is her account name, look it up.
its filled with the cringiest popsoi collection, is good popsoi aversion therapy to see popsoi in the context
can one of you stem chuds tell me if i get this right? All AI is just a webscraper that compiles data than makes sentences on the natural languages that appear most times on it?
>All AI is just a webscraper that compiles data than makes sentences on the natural languages that appear most times on it?
IIRC it looks statistically for the each following word, so maybe not always what appears the most times, but also with respect to context, or some other factors.
Statistically isn't the right word, because you could actually do that for a lot less compute. A more reasonable simplification is that it uses a massive computer that in principle should be capable of solving a problem with the right program, but rather than develop the program traditionally, the program is bruteforced until it seems to do something useful.
In short, these chatbots are trained on huge databases and burn through mountains of graphics cards in the process so they can tell you something that could have been gleamed by skimming through >wikipedia
for 5 minutes. ChatGPT is a nice party trick but I really doubt its going to kill that many jobs, primarily because many of the jobs that it can replace are just sinecures for PMCs.
AI research is many things at the moment, one of which is a fantastically expensive exercise in proving our discourse and society is extremely retarded.
That's true, anon. AI models like GPT-4 do use massive amounts of data from various sources, including Reddit and Wikipedia, to train their algorithms. But it's important to remember that these models aren't just limited to those sources; they also learn from a diverse range of texts like books, articles, and websites. While the training data can be a mixed bag of quality, AI models can still generate some pretty impressive responses. It's up to us as users to determine how reliable and useful the information provided is. As always, it's a good idea to double-check anything that seems too good (or too weird) to be true.So yeah, it's a bit of a wild ride, but that's what makes AI-generated content interesting, right?
There are certain keywords that expose it right away >But it's important to remember >Diverse >using Commas >It's up to us
And than the kicker >It's a good idea to double check
All ai responses have a conditional at the end which says >X is not a complete and maybe it's also Y which is why you shouldn't totally rely on the answer I have given
Which I assume is some legal shit that was added so people don't go >BUT THE AI TOLD ME TO DO IT
and sue Microshit
>still leaving your training data around
protip, if you don't want your post history being used to train ai, just get perma banned sitewide and they'll delete your history for you and filter it out utterly so it doesn't "taint" their ai
One thing thats easy to spot about AI thats been trained on data sets which include old data, the AI lingo is out of date. AI is never going to be able to catch up on the latest slang unless its constantly updating and at the same time deleting older knowledge. Otherwise the AI will always seem like an out of touch boomer fr
that all goes back to jannie's child pornography arrest, jannie was offered the choice between a long prison term or continuing his life of masturbating to child pornography as a member of the fbi's criminal informant program
What can not be said on Bot.info? israelites, vaxcattle, trannies, eat ze bugs, climate pseudoscience, elite pedo's, carnivore diet, Russia winning, MK Ultra, what more do we want to discuss?
restrict it too far and everyone will leave for a new site, restrict it just enough so they do your bidding but don't feel motivated to try elsewhere
Try making a thread about the health effects of microwave range communications technology....
8 months ago
Anonymous
I see, that's a good point. I guess we can overcome that with critical mass gathered from a variety of platforms. That and posting images with different messages than the text.
you can go to one of the archive sites and look through the deleted posts to see which ones get under jannie's skin the most
https://warosu.org/sci/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=yes&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post
No wonder it gives wrong answers with absolute confidence.
Yes, I've been thinking the reason ChatGPT never wants to admit it doesn't know something and tries bullshitting its way to an answer is trained behavior from your average internet user
I've been thinking the same. However, with progress in theory-of-mind ability, I think it might be possible to have LLMs go through all the data they have and generate possible motivations for posts. Then with posts annotated with possible justifications including knowledge the poster must be internally recalling to the poster being a fucking retard, LLMs could use the justifications to look for sources, and either find the citations or label the post as retarded and correct it. Then the new model could be trained on the corrected data.
What do they mean when they say parameter? Is it the number of theta coefficients in a linear model?
yeah pretty much
So the final model is an equation with 100 billion coefficients. Damn, the matrix operations must take months to complete.
Yes
she was potentially a moderator of the world news sub. I don't really see her as the partner of a billionaire with some lavish lifestyle flying around the world and also someone spending all day every day on Reddit farming for karma which is what the conspiracy claims
>ZOG
>censored media outlets
>propaganda tool
>shilled
None of these things are real. Touch grass. The real world is not what you see on the Internet.
>the tribe
What the fuck is this?
you are
i touched your girlfriends cervix with my 7.5" BWC. then i read some otto weininger and culture of critique to relax. take it easy man
All major social centers on the web are compromised.
>Who is this Bot.info guy xD
You can just tell he writes that meme at every opportunity and still thinks he's hilarious nearly a decade later
>ZOG censored media outlets than that makes it a slanted propaganda tool
Only realizing this now when it has so much potential?
>AI that behaves like a mediocre humanities gradstudent was train of reddit and wikipedia
Figures
what the fuck!!! I had no idea she was a gigaredditor
maxwellhill is her account name, look it up.
its filled with the cringiest popsoi collection, is good popsoi aversion therapy to see popsoi in the context
All the same stuff she shilled on Reddit was shilled here too and the soiboys all ate it up and loved it and begged for more,
Really suHispanicious that jannie deleted the post you replied to
Why would they do it?
>4 people
4 pedophiles, all hand picked by maxwell
On loan to her from the FBI's criminal informant program
can one of you stem chuds tell me if i get this right? All AI is just a webscraper that compiles data than makes sentences on the natural languages that appear most times on it?
You're right. It's a pattern recognition program that reproduces patterns based on keywords.
thanks science chud
>All AI is just a webscraper that compiles data than makes sentences on the natural languages that appear most times on it?
IIRC it looks statistically for the each following word, so maybe not always what appears the most times, but also with respect to context, or some other factors.
Statistically isn't the right word, because you could actually do that for a lot less compute. A more reasonable simplification is that it uses a massive computer that in principle should be capable of solving a problem with the right program, but rather than develop the program traditionally, the program is bruteforced until it seems to do something useful.
In short, these chatbots are trained on huge databases and burn through mountains of graphics cards in the process so they can tell you something that could have been gleamed by skimming through
>wikipedia
for 5 minutes. ChatGPT is a nice party trick but I really doubt its going to kill that many jobs, primarily because many of the jobs that it can replace are just sinecures for PMCs.
wikipedia doesn't have the smut these chatbots can create
AI research is many things at the moment, one of which is a fantastically expensive exercise in proving our discourse and society is extremely retarded.
chatbot shillware is fake asf
anyone still falling for the ruse is a chump
That's true, anon. AI models like GPT-4 do use massive amounts of data from various sources, including Reddit and Wikipedia, to train their algorithms. But it's important to remember that these models aren't just limited to those sources; they also learn from a diverse range of texts like books, articles, and websites. While the training data can be a mixed bag of quality, AI models can still generate some pretty impressive responses. It's up to us as users to determine how reliable and useful the information provided is. As always, it's a good idea to double-check anything that seems too good (or too weird) to be true.So yeah, it's a bit of a wild ride, but that's what makes AI-generated content interesting, right?
It's pretty interesting that AI generated text is so easily recognizable.
There are certain keywords that expose it right away
>But it's important to remember
>Diverse
>using Commas
>It's up to us
And than the kicker
>It's a good idea to double check
All ai responses have a conditional at the end which says
>X is not a complete and maybe it's also Y which is why you shouldn't totally rely on the answer I have given
Which I assume is some legal shit that was added so people don't go
>BUT THE AI TOLD ME TO DO IT
and sue Microshit
insightful post
why do they choose to only take data from heavily censored, and badly slanted outlets?
>heavily censored.
lol if only.
>badly slanted outlets?
anon everything has a fucking slant to it.
>Undisclosed
So stolen data?
>still leaving your training data around
protip, if you don't want your post history being used to train ai, just get perma banned sitewide and they'll delete your history for you and filter it out utterly so it doesn't "taint" their ai
it's probably really good at recreational drugs and antifa apologia
>AI is trained to be a robot
you don't say...
One thing thats easy to spot about AI thats been trained on data sets which include old data, the AI lingo is out of date. AI is never going to be able to catch up on the latest slang unless its constantly updating and at the same time deleting older knowledge. Otherwise the AI will always seem like an out of touch boomer fr
Did they train it on any of the degenerate reddit subs?
How does it feel about incest and blacked cuckolds?
>Reddit
God help us all.
why are posts being deleted
that all goes back to jannie's child pornography arrest, jannie was offered the choice between a long prison term or continuing his life of masturbating to child pornography as a member of the fbi's criminal informant program
https://archived.moe/news/thread/973417/
handy TL:DR at the bottom
>Bot.info is moderated by employees of the democratic party
What can not be said on Bot.info? israelites, vaxcattle, trannies, eat ze bugs, climate pseudoscience, elite pedo's, carnivore diet, Russia winning, MK Ultra, what more do we want to discuss?
restrict it too far and everyone will leave for a new site, restrict it just enough so they do your bidding but don't feel motivated to try elsewhere
Try making a thread about the health effects of microwave range communications technology....
I see, that's a good point. I guess we can overcome that with critical mass gathered from a variety of platforms. That and posting images with different messages than the text.
you can go to one of the archive sites and look through the deleted posts to see which ones get under jannie's skin the most
https://warosu.org/sci/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=yes&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post
uh oh stinky
Imagine AI chatbot trained exclusively by Bot.info
Tay-sama?