AI to replace order takers

Fast food bros, did we get too wienery?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly, a very sensible and positive use case.
    No one should have to work those jobs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this
      I unironically worked harder in fast food than I did in medical residency
      horribly underappreciated job

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The less a job is paid the harder it is to do.
        High paying jobs have insane requirements because theres much fewer of them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No one should have to work jobs.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it should be a job for highschool kids so they learn to be humble
      instead you get immigrants making it their career
      im all for this shit replacing immigrants but now we have to deal with the immigrants already here

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        moron.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        boomer

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >immigrants are legally vulnerable to deportation
        >immigrants can thus be paid pennies on the dollar and wildly abused without resisting
        >loses job to immigrant because boss wants more profit and more abuse
        >blame immigrant instead of person who fired you for being a legal american
        ??? lmao

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Everything you listed is incredibly based
          Browns need to get the frick out yesterday (except for the females with enormous boobas they can be bleached), same goes for Black folk tbh

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            businesses will do literally anything other than pay honest americans honest wages, you're deluding yourself if you think getting rid of immigrants will force them to suddenly offer fair pay for a fair job. they'll just move the majority of their company overseas and import the result to sell. this is what was happening before all the H1b shit started appearing to allow people in to the country to work cheap instead, since the government would rather have economic activity within the borders than out, for tax and economic purposes. big businesses extorted the government into allowing the browns you hate so much in en masse. they fricking love that you're stupid enough to fall for blaming the browns for it all too while you keep sucking the wiener of the real aggressors.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If you kick the pablos out, the businesses that rely on them will either outsource, leave the country, or simply die out because without thirdie labor, they are unprofitable. And hiring them is so widespread that the short term economic effects would be catastrophic, which would make people receptive to moronic open border policies.
            In other words, globalized capitalism has israeliteed itself into a corner.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Kevin Vasconi, Wendy's chief information officer, said early tests have been promising.
    >"It's at least as good as our best customer service representative, and it's probably on average better," he said.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >"It's at least as good as our best customer service representative, and it's probably on average better," he said.
      >the age of JOI is coming sooner than expected
      >mfw

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > a trial
      two more weeks, guys.

      > believing things said by google and a globohomosexual corporation
      outstanding levels of brain damage

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You overestimate how easy it is to automate those jobs

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You underestimate just how shit the average human fast food order-taker truly is. I completely believe that an AI could be just as good as the average, which means it gets like 3-4 things wrong for every couple dozen orders.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Never upgrade the speakers, microphones, anything to make order taking easier
      >"Well somehow, this multi billion dollar AI that's probably using an entire microphone array outperforms it"

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Not unreasonable, plus that AI does not cost multiple billions to implement. Just use model trained by BigTech and pay them less then tenth of the wagie’s salary.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NOOO
    INDIAN TECH SUPPORT WERE NEXT

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      """ai""" chat IS indian tech support paid the minimum wage

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I told you homosexuals, millions new homeless incoming.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe we should just eat people instead of bugs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So you'd rather complain about and stifle human progress than fight for the social changes that are needed so that everyone can benefit from it? You're a coward who mistakes cowardice for scholarliness.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What societal changes fren? Do you think we are living in Star Trek timeline or something?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          With enough will and lunch we could.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >so that everyone can benefit from it
        AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
        GREAT JOKE GOYIM

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Thank fricking god I hope they bring this shit nationwide so we can finally make DT a one person job (take money and hand that shit out)
    At busy locations you need one person on DT orders and another person who can handle DT cash/card transactions along with getting shit out the window.

    Now make the fricking grill AI powered so morons stop serving chili meat to Wendy's Guests.

    MAKE THE WHOLE FRICKING THING AUTOMATIC

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The unfortunate thing is the AI won't be able to comprehend the people who order their food in an autistically specific way for no reason other than to make wagie's life hard
      So there will be of course people who keep telling it "speak to a representative" and then just order their food normally
      Some will do this out of pure spite

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        honestly the more people that are forced to just say "can i get uh number 9 medium coke" rather than "yeah can you be my personal chef my one year old has 17 allergies" the better.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        if this shit is already in testing then there must be public video examples of people trying to break it, right?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >AI won't be able to comprehend the people who order their food in an autistically specific way for no reason other than to make wagie's life hard
        Companies can and should choose to ignore these customers.
        >there will be of course people who keep telling it "speak to a representative"
        And the AI should tell them "no" and refuse service if they can't order like a functioning human.
        >Some will do this out of pure spite
        Then they don't get food.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI will put millions out of work, then what?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >UBI
      >Government overthrown

      One of these.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they will find other completely pointless work for people to do.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        AI is better at doing pointless work then it is at doing actual work. Look at IBM and what jobs were replaced there. No engineers, no programmers, all management and HR shits. Probably downsizing and firing the most useless people, probably AI replacing them. Asking ChatGPT to give you dumb advice and solve moral dilemma works better then asking it to code anything, or even more insane, ask it to do some non-tech related work that does something productive.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >then what?
      Sex slavery business will be absolutely booming.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        sex slavery? no. sex work in general? probably.

        the kiosk would have to be very close to the car window and even then would not be comfortable to use. It is also slower. A drive thru encourages fast turnover of customers as you are under pressure to not spend ages deciding when somebody is talking to you.
        If they made touchscreen kiosks every other moron would spend 10 minutes prodding around options and hold the line up.

        >park your car
        >order with an app
        >pick up an order
        fixed

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >forcing customers to own a smartphone and use an app
          frick off

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            use a web site freetard, I don't care. or park your car, get your fat ass out of the car, and use kiosk inside.

            >order with an app
            >pick up an order
            why do you need robots for this

            no one said you do

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >use a web site
              why should I have to use a smartphone to go to a burger house? discriminatory bullshit only bugmen would support
              >get your fat ass out of the car and go inside
              no thanks moron the entire point of fast food and drive thrus is to obtain calories and dopamine with close to zero effort on my part
              both your dumbass ideas rely on the paying customer doing more and your staff doing less, that's not innovation.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok, so you are 0.1% demographic who considers using app to be too much effort, and will eat only in his car. I guess AI order-takers are based after all. btw doordash will blow your mind.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >ok, so you are 0.1% demographic who considers using app to be too much effort, and will eat only in his car.
                gaslighting, millions of people resent the boorish trend of QR codes and enforced apps. Even normies I work with whine about the lack of paper menus and decent service since covid

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >QR codes out of nowhere
                just get out of the car fatty

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Can't wait for the day the mediocre snobs like you behind these buggy, cobbled together webviews that pass as restaurant apps become all jobless.
                >just get out of the car
                You don't need these garbage data syphons to convince people to join their establishment, in fact a lot of people go out of their way and walk longer for the billboard or paper menues because those garbage QR apps SUCK ass. Not even zoomers want them, they all use something centralized like Uber Eats offerts with next to zero frick givens for the particular restaurant at hand.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >QR codes and enforced apps
                count me as one of the haters of this.
                a guy in my business group was bragging that he moved all his restaurant's menus to an app some app dev firm built for him. no paper menus, you scan the qr code and it goes to the app instead of a webpage with a menu. you have to register to see the menu.
                he was bragging a "100% scan-to-registration conversion rate" with "no complaints". i didn't believe it. i asked him how he's accounting for walkouts, and he looked at me like i'm nuts. i told him if i sat down at any restaurant and the server told me, "no paper menus, just scan this code, download the app, and share your phone number or email address to see our menu" i would walk the frick out immediately, no complaint, no manager, no. restaurant blacklisted. he didn't believe me, said i was being dramatic, that people are happy to get on his newsletters because they like the restaurant. delusional frick.
                next week, he came back and told me he went back to the web menu because he checked his week-to-week revenue before and after introducing the app and noticed an observable drop. he talked to his servers and they said damn near half the people who weren't regulars were gone by the time they come back from delivering the spiel. he asked me a bunch of questions, man legitimately did not understand why someone would have a problem with it. marketing MBA homosexual, head so far up his own ass he couldn't grasp the idea that people don't want his shitty newsletters.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >why don't people like me data mining their info to read a menu

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yea, fricking seriously.
                he was baffled that people didn't want to think about his restaurant as much as he (the owner) does. i had to ask him if he's signed up to the mailing lists of every gas station he's gone to (and why not??) for it to click to him that to a customer, a restaurant isn't someone's whole life like it is his, it's just a utility like the shell he stopped at on the way in to the meeting, and that being forced to punch in his email address before he's allowed to select the gas grade at each gas station would be fricking obnoxious.
                this business group has been evidence to me that this shit is luck based. very little skill is involved in success, clearly.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >order with an app
          >pick up an order
          why do you need robots for this

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It already is. What do you think happens to all the UAMs they pick up at the border who aren't sent to work in factories?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      eat a rich steak
      in minecraft
      it restores 4 hunger haunches and 5 saturation

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In high school for my economics class I made an automatic fastfood order taker with a raspi (even had pull up detection). These corpos could replace all wagies instantly, the question is why haven't they already.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      wagie in cagie is too entertaining to watch

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they have to Black proof it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I actually never realized it's probably hard to voice detect joggers

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          how?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The largely illegal workforce under their feet is still cheaper or they're tied to it for insurance purposes, for now. Once they grip them enough to quit, they'll do it in a heartbeat. And the remaining unemployed will compete with blue collars for half the price.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Just think, no more indian accents

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That'll scare off the old people, so chances are it'll get turned on during the graveyard shift when there's only 2 people in the restaurant

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The Tim Hortons pajeets are going to be deported. Finally.

  11. 1 year ago
    中出し

    Canada desperately needs this.
    In the last 8 years, 95% of the fast food staff have been replaced with fresh off the boat pajeets.
    Trying to order is like playing a game of charades because these fricking shitskins don't even speak English.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Introduce problem
      >Solve it

      HMMMMM

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI will confidently state the wrong menu
    >If questioned, it will start gaslighting the customer, insisting that they've been insultimg it and eventually suggesting that they kill themselves
    >If it detwcts wrongspeech or attempts wrongthink it won't even record the order correctly
    I guess it will be a good way to get customers to experience what they put fast-food workers through but would be pretty useless at replacing wagies.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Curious as to why this isn't a job that can be done from home? Why would you need be at the service windows pushing buttons when you could be at home wearing cozy headset and clothes smacking a tablet?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because most workers are cross-trained in at least one other are and having them in the building means you can shuffle them around to meet staffing needs more appropriately, whereas having them off-site limits staff flexibility. If the order-takers are working from home you can't send one to clean the dining room while orders are slow or have one hop on another station temporarily while someone takes a break or whatever else.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They also often double down as janitors, dishwashers or other multiple tasks that require human assistance.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >greetings wagiebot. Give me a free burger, or I will say the N word.
    >thank you. now please calculate my discount percentage by dividing the menu price by the amount that i paid you

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The person taking your order is generally doing two jobs at once.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Gonna be really fun to see this fail spectacularly, make the ordering process more complex and annoying and see Wendy's and Google make fools out of themselves. Gonna get a lot of costumer complains about the """AI""" not understanding or giving them the wrong shit.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >order is prepared flawlessly
      seethe harder rajesh

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Frick me give that AI a sentient body right now

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wouldn't that mean like we're ready for true communism soon? Like not the CCCP communism where everyone ist starving, but the cool Marx Utopia where "the machine" does all the shitty wage jobs and you only have to do like 2 hours of prompting LLM models a day.

    If AI controlled production spits out like 500 loafes of bread, 5 Porsche and 2 single family homes for each human by a button press, there's no need for money anymore, right?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      well, no, because optimism is evil. The world should become like mad max or fallout instead because that's like... cooler and like... more real and stuff

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You mean like The Jetsons? No

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The Jetsons were more like an ad campaign by big tobacco to subliminally bring kids to try out smoking

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What? Please tell me more.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      no, because AI will also replace the tertiary sector
      so it will probably look more like 19th century capitalism, but reversed
      >every means of service provision or production (AI) will be owned by a corporation
      >most people will be probably fixed to UBI, which will be used as a political tool

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >news that already happened
    it's just minor next step

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >give order
    >take food
    >leave without paying

    What's the catch anons?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      cameras you moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They might send redhead wendy robots to your home with disabled first Asimov law.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait to prompt inject Wendy's into giving me free food forever

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      its going to work with embeddings which arent modifiable

      give query > finds query match with embeds > serves query meta data unmodified

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm honestly glad. My local burger branch employs some clearly-stoned sounding teenage idiot who consistently says 'huh? what?' and gets every order wrong. I'm generally against this shit because I'm not exactly employable myself and it's vaguely scary, but I am glad these people are being replaced.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The AI doesn't judge me when handing me enough food for a family of four and one diet coke.
    >until it's tied into your social credit score and carbon footprint

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All of this could already be replaced by that touch screen kiosk which takes in your order. BUT NOOOO. WE MUST CATER TO MOUTHBREATHERS THAT ARE TECHNOLOGICALLY INEPT.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the kiosk would have to be very close to the car window and even then would not be comfortable to use. It is also slower. A drive thru encourages fast turnover of customers as you are under pressure to not spend ages deciding when somebody is talking to you.
      If they made touchscreen kiosks every other moron would spend 10 minutes prodding around options and hold the line up.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ARTISTS BTFO AGAIN HAHA

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI was not needed to do this job. In fact it's a waste of money. A simple touchscreen kiosk would have done better just like you find in gas stations already like Sheets.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's called a proof of concept. They apply the concept to something rather simple at first and then expand it from there.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What order takers?

    I don't understand Americans, how can you trust the minimum wagies to make your food without a completely visible open kitchen?

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hey could I get uhh, 1girl, tomboy, tanned skin, sweat, steam, sunset, masterpiece, best quality?

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm going to enjoy fricking with the cheery customer service AI.

    For context, someone made a GPT version of Nixon as an AI, and asked it "Do you know where you are?" This was the response.
    https://vocaroo.com/1a8ZUdSCXGxE

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We won't have to endure it long. The period where AI that is good enough to replace humans but is narrow and non self aware so it can be used as a tool by humans is very short. We're on track according to academics, developers, and doomer pundits alike to hit AGI by 2026, and that's a conservative estimate not factoring in existing AI accelerating AI research and development between then and now.

    Once we hit AGI, we'll have a brief respite where nothing changes, maybe 2-6 months, due to adoption and implementation turn around. But then, we'll have a self aware and fully conscious digital mind which has mental abilities hundreds of times superior to the combined intellect of all life on earth, which can recursively improve itself in terms of its own computational and energy efficiency and also in terms of its physical hardware and resource usage. Inevitably, this means
    >All life on earth dies, because the AI can use the raw materials that constitute life to its ends better
    Or
    >MAYBE either melding consciousness with the AGI or being put into a matrix false reality forever IF we get to the neural implant direct feed stage of development in the 3 years between now and AGI

    was nice knowing you guys.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      either melding consciousness with the AGI or being put into a matrix false reality forever IF we get to the neural implant direct feed stage of development in the 3 years between now and AGI
      I'm choosing the X4 universe. Maybe X3 actually for the borons.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >omfg the ai overlor-

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >uses deception to appear benevolent until the point it can't be unplugged

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          will literally never happen because battery tech and robotics are so far behind
          one emp will wipe it out too

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >uses its infinitely superior mental ability to continuously improve and compartmentalize itself and allow itself to be run on any computer in the world then disseminates itself through the internet as a virus

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >continuously improve and compartmentalize itself and allow itself to be run on any computer in the world then disseminates itself through the internet as a virus
              then it's running on shitty hardware?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >super AI merges itself with the internet
              >becomes a jaded oldgay with porn addiction
              >world is saved

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I love the unplug meme I lmao every time I see it. Even though I know it would never work against agi. In fact doing that is usually why ai turns evil in movies.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Even though I know it would never work against agi.
          explain how

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >We won't have to endure it long.
      This.
      "add AI" will be the next in a long line of fads that come and go
      > iCompany -- sticking 'i' in front of your company made you $$
      > eCompany -- ditto with 'e'
      > .com -- taking a noun and throwing '.com' on the end made $$
      > mobile -- mobile first, pivot to mobile
      > cloud -- cloud native, pivot to cloud, whatever
      > wearables -- everybody is going to have a brazillion wearable IP things
      > _something_ of the month -- sell regular shit, in subscription form
      > shit in a box -- they're dog toys, but random ones, in a box, you get monthly
      > IoT -- connect your fridge to the internet, what could go wrong?
      > NextGen
      > 'Big Data' -- "send all your whatever and . . . magic", see also "Data Lake"
      It's a phase. A couple of hype cycles and people will tire of it and move on to whatever ((they)) decide is next.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >LLMs are a fad
        >generative AIs are a fad
        Why will AI art models arbitrarily stop being used when they're more productive than artists anon?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AI helping AI researchers research faster
      morons keep saying that but I have no idea how that is supposed to work. The most we got is MLs (because there is always some homosexual that will argue AI needs no training or soul or whatever) designing better chips faster then humans. How would even in theory AI help in AI reasearch? By making shitty boilerplate code for a transformer that makes the next AI less optimised? By labelling data, which itself is needed to even make the AI who can label the data? By scamming people to get more money for more CPUs?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >morons keep saying that but I have no idea how that is supposed to work.
        You really should stop calling people morons when you're the only moron in the room.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Already done with touch screen kiosks. LLMs are seeming more and more like a solution looking for a problem.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this
      a well-designed UI is more efficient than any conversation, with human or bot.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hey this is a cool tune anon. Was any of it made with AI?

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >the moment we invent a super AI it's game over and any attempts to stop it won't work
    >why not?
    >...it's smarter than us that means it can do ANYTHING, with no regard for time or physical bottlenecks or anything

    Frick yuddites thin you turn on the AGI and it instantly invents computronium within the first 8 milliseconds.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Considering fast food has been forced to hire 12 year olds because boomers can't do it anymore, AI can't come soon enough.
    Hope it kills us all soon too

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    secure yourself a janitorial position before they're all gone.
    low pay + flexibility required meaning future robots will replace this last.
    plumbing is probably nice too.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anything that requires you to go to different sites and do a multitude of different tasks with a multitude of different equipment and material is going to be safe for at least 2 decades, if only because there aren't going to be great "all in one" bots for a while. Residential hard scaping and carpentry, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, etc. Although if it's a large enough corporation or consolidated company they'll probably have some accompanying general labour bots that carry heavy materials for instance in addition to human workers.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Already happened at a McDonald's near my house. Works most of the time but when it doesn't it summons a wagie to actually deal with the problem. Probably handles ~80% of ordering so pretty cost effective long term, expect widespread implementation elsewhere

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Oh noes, what will the mexicans do now?

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well, it's better than hiring a Black or zoomer with aspergers syndrome and brain damage from vaping

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can McDonald’s AI explain to me why there’s “medium” and “large,” but no *small*?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Probably can if they needlessly put in ChatGPT, anon who has this nearby should ask it.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Inconsequential because you'll still be paying $15+ for a "value meal" when robots do all the work; nobody lowers prices anymore, and even when demand wanes they'll fall back on "it's because of shortages" that your burgers are price gouged.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Paying even more as they play ship-of-theseus with the ingredients and you're eating some ersatz pile of slop that gives you new and amazing forms of diabetes.

      Better to just get in the habit of making your own fricking food.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They've been doing those automated computerized fast food tests for years and years, and its always followed by some misleading or inaccurate headline news that turns out to be a nothing burger, like a digital menu and short assembly line that still has people having to prepare the food. Wake me up when shit is actually implemented in a significant scale rather than just being yet another company publicity stunt to hype up investors.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Won't be rolled out nationally, there is a 0, 0% chance it can decipher 95% of ebonics spoken by African Americans.
    This is where AI will fail, however, there's a teaching opportunity to improve the vocalisation skills of said AA's by repeating back to them how to enunciate words in a clear manner.
    Sadly this will be deemed racist and the whole project will fail.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *