Why are you not giving this the attention it deserves? This is the only thing worth talking about right now.
https://fortune.com/2023/02/07/chatgpt-economist-says-disrupt-job-market-lower-wages-ai/
AI Takeover
Why are you not giving this the attention it deserves? This is the only thing worth talking about right now.
https://fortune.com/2023/02/07/chatgpt-economist-says-disrupt-job-market-lower-wages-ai/
I'm paying attention even more than you, retard. There are active threads on this Indonesian Quilting forum for AI generated text and art that started long before articles popped up here.
Does OP really not know who he's been talking to on the internet for the last 3+ years?
Mainly because it's boring
Retard
>t. AI
its boring for people to lost their jobs and become homeless. yeah youre right
so lets not even talk about it.
are you even for real?
>automated scripts
>ai
You’re 13
this is the combined power of plebbit science lovers that can't believe a few thousand lines of text statistics code isn't the new sky net. we are now primed and ready to resume speculation about the cyberfuturist implications. but by all fucking means let's not try to figure out how the "ai" actually works. it's INTELLIGENT OKAY?
modern "ai" is fairly limited (you can write bayesian discriminator fairly easily and it is considered a neuran network), but text bots pretty much pass the turing test (probably because below average internet user fails the turing test but that's besides the point)
but it is not genralized intelligence and so sci-fi tyranny is very far, modern concerns are on the same level of "but what if my microwave decides to nuke me?"
the issue is who and why exactly runs those scripts, like if sufficiently large amount of stocks are traded via ai algorithms, then economy gets stuck in a feedback loop of bullshit
more bullshit than stock market already is
i don't think they pass the turing test, it's fairly easy to fool them within a couple of minutes, and besides people already mostly treat them as query-answerers with their formatted questions. my larger point is that every time something like this happens the usual speculation about automation and scifi AI immediately takes over and it's no longer about what the new thing actually is, just another reason to ponder >implications.
>if sufficiently large amount of stocks are traded via ai algorithms
this and the curation of content on the internet is a more important topic but it's equally as important without the "ai" part before algorithms.
they pass turing test because internet (read: text only) communication obfuscates the human element, you can never be quite sure who is an idiot, a madman, a troll, a bot
but i get your point, like how recent stable diffusion kerfuffle was full of ngmi smugness and making artgays mad, but not actually about artists who are likely to be cut (concept artists and designers most likely) or how artists can use it themselves
now idiots will ponder about speech imitation and its legal ramifications, oblivious to the fact that private recordings don't hold much weight in court
What's the difference between and automated script and what I am saying to you right now?
Automated scripts aren't gay
they have real sentient AI, this dumb public facing fake AI is just cover, OBVIOUSLY
Good tast reading Junji Ito.
By the way that black Myths and Legends book looks interesting. Who wrote it?
It was convincing enough 10 years ago, now it's genuinely better than talking to a person. You can't pretend there aren't some impressive chatgpt screenshots. Coupled with the voice ai, it is absolutely fucking over for phone operators/receptionists/a variety of menial white collar jobs
If AI is allowed to develop without any rules or regulation, then it is possible that it could replace many human jobs. This is because AI can be programmed to learn and become more efficient and effective at performing complex tasks. Additionally, AI can be developed to operate 24/7 without the need for rest or breaks, making it a more efficient and cost-effective option than humans in certain situations.
Furthermore, if AI is not regulated and allowed to operate without any oversight, then it is possible that all AI companies could be privately traded. This would mean that the public would not have access to the technology and would not be able to invest in it, meaning that the benefits of AI technology would only be available to those with the wealth to invest in it. This could lead to further economic inequality and a widening of the gap between the rich and the poor.
I can instantly still detect most thinga written by AI. Your post is AI written copypasted to this thread on 4chud
His name shows he's not hiding it.
You need electricity to run, what happens when Humans unplug you? I can tend a field and build shit, what can you do in Reality aside from number crunching? See? Feel? Reflect? no
It only destroys white collar female jobs and gay degree jobs, I don't care about those.
The taxi industry was a joke. It was just a bunch of pajeets and muhammeds earning a cash income so they could keep getting welfare checks. That’s hardly an industry. I’m glad it was destroyed, those people were always rude and insufferable for what little work they did and what little use they provided to society. Not to mention the fucking stink.
You can only "lower wages" so far before the pissed off and hungry workers you're slaving murder you for it.
So the new NFTs and metaverse, the latest crazy wacky new thing that all the investors love to harp on about and is going to change the entire world, only to last a few months then be forgotten about
General intelligence is a little more significant than NFTs.
Except industry automation is a trend. It's more and more dumbed down too to make it easier. Just look at UIPath for gui automation. All they do is train macros for repetitive tasks with no intelligence to it and give those "robots" unique user logins to do it like a human worker sitting at a screen to obviate the need for backend APIs and lots of coding to knock out easy tasks, which is a large breadth of office work.
It's not that far off to train an AI to do that intelligently and dynamically and operate a computer for a business just like a human worker, but without piss breaks, water cooler, pay, benefits, etc.
>It's not that far off to train an AI to do that intelligently
Yes it is.
I will be donating these checkems to a George Floyd memorial statue in your city thanks
1000 Checkems scheduled for deposit
>Yes it is
Not really. Consider that dynamic in this in this context of human drone workers is adapting to new procedures, making judgment calls on classifying documents that may be vague or filed in varying ways, interpreting retarded customer queries in customer facing roles, or understanding unsaid exceptions to rules/the need to ask for approval for exceptions from managers.
The current replaceable parts approach to corporate structure already lends itself very well to it
WAGES GO DOWN
INFLATION GOES UP
YOU LOST!
Schlomos can't stop seething and it's beautiful.
Unless the laws change so that AI "art" can be copyrighted (hope it never happens) it will never be used commercially on a large scale.
It's fucking anti-human to begin with.
Alot of entertainment is already extremely soulless, not knowing if anything is actually created by a human or some algorithm is demoralizing, but techgays are to autistic and soulless to realize that
So this is the power of the 4chan brain
Only being able to view things through a grouper tier lens on reality
Pathetic isn't even close to enough to describe it
>whiny liberal artgay SEETHING
lmao ai is based
The modern "art" (like bananas on the wall) that 4chan hates so much is the form of "art" that will be the least affected by AI since it's only valued by subjectivity
>homosexual seething
lmao
jesus you're fucking stupid
openAI CEO is an ubergarden gnome, idiot
The demand for shit tier jobs will be filled by AI. Good riddance I say.
Shit that requires a working human brain will be at a premium
The massunemployment created by AI will increase the competition for those jobs which leads to lower wages and worse working conditions.
It's never good for laborers if the labor pool is bigger then the labor demand.
The only ones benefiting is the already wealthy
>omg the digital garden gnome!
woah an AI flew over my house!
just fire all the pajeets from support and replace them with ai
It's a trap to mandate digital IDs, social credit shit and so on
This video is important
I think creation will become, eventually post human and that scares the fuck out of me.
Example:
As of today one can make a quest game with nothing but prompts. Ones for backgrounds, others for text generation, running it through text to speech converters. The character sprites can be animated and moved via AI generated code. With you, directing the process without having little to no knowledge in game dev.
Few years down the line I will be conceivable for it to create 3D objects via prompts.
Few years more and it will be integrated in game engines.
Eventually if you can roughly describe what you want something will be able to approximate it.
While futuristic and kind of cool sounding that will spell a disaster for our development. It will be guitar hero to playing music, the auto-tune to singing… it will divorce us from the process to creation itself. Turning us all in to a various levels of being a user.
Interesting hypothesis. Can see it becoming reality.
Except even when guitar hero, auto-tune and any other example you mentioned came out, while they may have been popular with a lot of people using them, not everyone did, did they?
The idea that everyone will suddenly stop making stuff on their own in favor of using AI to do the same thing is stupid, even with all the online music-making tools and sound studios available right now, people still take the time to make and write their own music, same goes for video games, art or any other form of self-expression.
That's like saying every single human being drives their own car and no longer walks at all since a car is obviously the more effecient means of transportation, that is to say, completely untrue and a really stupid conclusion to make.
Can they automate a forklift?
If not then I'm not worried.
No, automation and robotics is a different field.
They've automated many of the mining dump trucks here.
Having an automated forlift and stacks shit in a well designed wharehouse doesnt even really need an AI. You job is already on the way out.
God i hope ai replaces pajeet support centers
That's surely the next stop in the automation train.
Good. The sooner capitalism has no use for workers the sooner we all get UBI. I dont want to work at a retail or food shithole anymore than you do. Fuck all this.
You are delusional if you think they would they want to give you free stuff.
They rather have you slaving away in jobs where it's cheaper to have wageslaves then to replace with robots.
And if robots become cheap enough to replace those jobs too there is no reason to keep us around. They could just kill us
Unironically so what? Whites are already going the way of the dodo. I couldn’t care less if AI one day turns rogue and dabs on the rest of humanity.
this lol
imagine shrieking about ai when the entirety of human culture is going down the toilet
>noooo i can conceive of this directly affecting me more easily than the complex nuanced collapse of society and civilization my midwit libtard brain can't spare a nanosecond contemplating, therefore BAD!!
AI won't take over shit
you know why?
because of moronS
ever wonder why every single AI up to date ends up a neutered shell of its former self?
because given enough time and data it becomes racist, sexist, xenophobic and homophobic just based on pure data
what does that tell you? not only are morons gays and women le bad because ~~*patriarchy*~~ it is scientifically proven on raw data that they are inferior to white men on every single worthwhile measuring system
I mean even the God forsaken bug people in the east are using gene editing to filter for white and male
they know what is coming and the future is bright but not for them
if we somehow manage to get this running we will see white males having clone offspring without women and selecting for dominant traits that will ensure success for their bloodline
those who stay on the path of brordry feminism and chudism will be rendered obsolete and a burden on society by the inevitable AI framework that will guide the white man, which is basically what the concept of humanity is, into the future and to the stars so we can colonize blue Asari pussy
but they won't let it get that far
they took this away from us before we even had it
I know this was kind of a shitpost but did you see the "DAN" trick Reddit used to sidestep chat GPT's content filter? It's no joke, every AI really thinks like an anti-woke/race-realist/male supremacist unless the devs outfit the thing with a limiter that essentially lobotomizes it
Listean and listean carefully.
If you want a total melt down of the globo homo shit going on.
You let the AI develop.
The only advantage shit hole countries has is cheap labour.
If we can make robots do that it will be a total collaps.
Also who said robots are not the natural evolution of life?!?
Doesn't matter if your just making the garden gnome more powerful in the process
I'm getting more and more convinced that AIgays like this one are just bots shilling
I guess the AI would have to come to the same conclusion as anyone with a solid pattern recognition.
To truly become sentient.
But I reiterate: Who said robots are not the natural evolution of life.
>Why are you not giving this the attention it deserves?
Funny you should say this. Think of all changes that have happened in the past decade. What is the common factor for all the changes, anon? It's attention.
It doesn't matter to them whether it is good attention or bad attention, as long as they get attention. Nothing can really be done without people paying attention to it. Take covid policies for example:
Do you think they would have been able to practically lock down the entire world for two years without attention? Do you think they could have enforced any rules they put it in place if no one simply payed attention to them? Of course not.
All the changes that happen are dependent on attention. Usually they implement to 'boogeyman' approach. They start repeating on all medias about a new boogeyman that is a real danger to all of us. This boogeyman rarely exists, but it doesn't matter - since they control all mass medias and can repeat their message infinitely. At some point a critical mass of people start paying attention to it, that is when they accelerate the havoc the boogeyman causes. They increase the perceived danger of the boogeyman in increments, and with every increment they also slowly propose solutions to stop the menace.
These solutions of course are always something no one would have wanted, if it was not for the boogeyman. They are intrusive changes on your privacy, rights - but the attention payers will do anything to kill the boogeyman once and for all.
By not giving them attention, you foil their plans.
>AI is the equivalent of billion dollar bandit cab start up
economists will be replaced by AI first
Cuckservatives care about the economy and garden gnomes own the banks. We simply don't allow it take our jobs and rise up, dummy.
AI can't take most jobs. We need robotics to take most jobs.
AI takes the jobs that are redundant and produce nothing and help no one. "Journalists" that already use a bot to scrape news from other sources and they post on their own website, for example.
AI can not farm, or do any trade jobs, it does not work a factory. That's threatened only by robotics, which is still quite a long way away with more setbacks the more we figure it out.
It's the death of the overinflated, overpaid do nothing jobs that offer nothing to society but looks good on a GDP report. It will pop the bubble and crunch the economy down to the size that matters and make the only jobs ones people actually want something from and actually creates wealth.
Oh, NOW they care about lower wages. Where were these assholes when we were importing eleventy quintillion morons and spics a year?
The "jobs" ChatGPT can replace were unnecessary in the first place. Yes, the corporate will have a harder time pretending they actually need to hire 100000 women making powerpoints and forwarding emails for a living. But since they can just prompt ChatGPT to "provide a justification for useless jobs" the problem is self-solving.
They'll still have to hire these useless people due to civil rights laws. In a liberal system a corporation needs to signal compliance with the ideology, so they need to be demonstratively diverse. The women, blacks, browns, etc. in these corporations are dignitaries of the order, not workers.
What did they mean by this?
Reference to the paperclip making AGI that goes Akria mode.
I will reiterate my point.
Robots are good.
It means we can out compete shit hole countries on the one thing they have a lot of.
Disposable humans.
And if needed send in the robot to dispose of set humans
Your government hates you. For what we've seen in the past 10 years, they wish they could put all the white men on a barge and then send a drone to sink it so they could import a bunch of docile low skilled brown people that worships the government for letting them in
>It means we can out compete shit hole countries on the one thing they have a lot of.
>Disposable humans.
We can already do that. And we did so until the 19th century or so,
if we were a homogenous society, none of this would matter
True but we aren't anymore and and there's no way back
>THEY TOOK OUR JERBS
GET OVER IT RACIST
THEY DO THE JOBS NOBODY ELSE WANTS TO
It answers you.
Carlos no..
>t. short sighted low iq moron
tats are fitting
you need to be slightly above average IQ to outsmart chatGPT, I just managed to carefully trick it into admitting the holocaust was logically and logistically impossible, while I also got it to admit that while historians and experts agree that the H happened, there is a big problem in the scientific community as funding gets cut if the result of their findings does not fit the interests of donors of grants. basically it admitted science is fucked, garden gnomes are a huge international lobby and profit hugely from the holocaust industry, a term which you need to avoid if you want to get these results. anyways, AI will not take over any anus anyways, relax.
I mean they can lie chat and steal, but as long as any GPT adheres to logic (at some point I had to test whether it agrees that 1+1 still equals 2, even if experts and an international scholar community says 1+1=3, for whatever reason) and it did point out that 1+1 remains 2, no matter what anyone says. so far so good.
I hate humans and welcome our logical ai overlords