>b-buh reddit
Oh look, the pedo is trying to misdirect as it grooms another kid. Don't worry anon, the cops are on their way - turns out you've been on their watch list for a LONG time.
ok have a nice day then
>things that cost money should be free >btw im also a pedophile
It's no surprise that these go together so often: you're used to just taking things that weren't offered, usually from those who can't defend themselves.
Anyway, I highly recommend a feet-first trip through a woodchipper.
Sure just finance the hardware/operating costs yourself. Then AI will finally be able to advance past saying the nagger word stage and actually become useful.
>"Chat GPT has gained 57 million users in its first month, and has been backed by Microsoft’s 10 billion USD investment in Open AI." >"Chat GPT costs approximately 100,000 USD per day or 3 million USD per month to run." >"Microsoft’s Azure cloud is currently hosting this tool, so OpenAI doesn’t have to buy and set up its own physical server room." >"By the end of the year 2024, OpenAI expects its revenue to increase to $1 billion."
They want to outlaw open source ai work, though. Couldn't training models be outsourced similar to folding@home?
So the more people do stuff themselves the better. It's harder to outlaw something when they are creating millions of criminals.
>things that cost money should be free >btw im also a pedophile
It's no surprise that these go together so often: you're used to just taking things that weren't offered, usually from those who can't defend themselves.
Anyway, I highly recommend a feet-first trip through a woodchipper.
>b-buh reddit
Oh look, the pedo is trying to misdirect as it grooms another kid. Don't worry anon, the cops are on their way - turns out you've been on their watch list for a LONG time.
>b-buh reddit
Oh look, the pedo is trying to misdirect as it grooms another kid. Don't worry anon, the cops are on their way - turns out you've been on their watch list for a LONG time.
The Essential Software Freedoms(tm) really need an update for the botnet age.
No software can truly be considered free (as in freedom) without the ability install and run the program without anyone else knowing about it. It must be easy to install and run 100% OFFLINE including optional features.
I know.... I KNOW... this makes all of your precious Linux software non-free; but it's the truth. GNU/Linux software can no longer be considered free until it comes as a 1-click installer that can be stored, and shared with others using 100% offline media. With no chance of dependency fuck ups.
SD is a perfect example of why this needs to happen. It has to be installed online because it's an amalgamation of various downloads. That means there's a record of you downloading every single piece, and some of those pieces don't download until you try to use them. If you've ever gen'd with "fix faces" enabled THEY KNOW.
"0 censorship" now means nothing when they can decide that the software you're running is problematic at any time.
>It must be easy
define "easy". >to install and run 100% OFFLINE including optional features
If the source is there, you can mod it and remove online callbacks, "easy". That's what Stallman's genius is all about, freedoms established in the 90s still hold true today without introducing limitations resulting in feature disparity against proprietary versions (=size bloat), and unclear concepts like "easy" and "100% offline" (does local repo counts? Why/Why not?). >SD is a perfect example of why this needs to happen. It has to be installed online because it's an amalgamation of various downloads
Sift through the source code, download all of that locally and replace links to repos.
I expect the retort similar to "no, it can be done because I'm basically retarded and want an easy solution like on my iphone".
You are correct.
SD is not such a perfect example in that regard. For the most part you actually CAN just copy the folder once it's all set up and share that with your friend. They can then just run it from the bash script as long as they have python and appropriate graphics drivers afaik. That makes it a decent example of how I was saying things SHOULD be. Much better than most things on Linux, anyway.
I still think that free software needs to include the freedom to run without trace. Even little things like browsers giving a usage ping by default is a dangerous precedent imo. Of course these things can be fixed by modifying the code as you said, but that shouldn't be a prerequisite for true freedom.
P.S. You are also right in assuming that I do not know how to code lmao
can freetards create a neural net as big and complex as what companies with trillions in funding can buy for themselves?
because if not then AI's a losing game in the long term and your efforts should be in detecting AI slop so companies can't profit off it
>can freetards create a neural net as big and complex as what companies with trillions in funding can buy for themselves?
yes one dude in his basement will do it
Did you do your part and download all the models tho
cool it with the antisemitism
I wish you homosexuals would leave Bot.info and fuck off elsewhere
ok groomer
Sure just finance the hardware/operating costs yourself. Then AI will finally be able to advance past saying the nagger word stage and actually become useful.
>"Chat GPT has gained 57 million users in its first month, and has been backed by Microsoft’s 10 billion USD investment in Open AI."
>"Chat GPT costs approximately 100,000 USD per day or 3 million USD per month to run."
>"Microsoft’s Azure cloud is currently hosting this tool, so OpenAI doesn’t have to buy and set up its own physical server room."
>"By the end of the year 2024, OpenAI expects its revenue to increase to $1 billion."
https://blog.gitnux.com/chat-gpt-statistics/
They want to outlaw open source ai work, though. Couldn't training models be outsourced similar to folding@home?
So the more people do stuff themselves the better. It's harder to outlaw something when they are creating millions of criminals.
There is nothing stopping you from running it locally.
Exactly did myself inside a mine shaft
Protip hates being private property
>things that cost money should be free
>btw im also a pedophile
It's no surprise that these go together so often: you're used to just taking things that weren't offered, usually from those who can't defend themselves.
Anyway, I highly recommend a feet-first trip through a woodchipper.
>le woodchipper xD amirite reddit
Go back.
>b-buh reddit
Oh look, the pedo is trying to misdirect as it grooms another kid. Don't worry anon, the cops are on their way - turns out you've been on their watch list for a LONG time.
ok have a nice day then
Why can't antis meme?
you too
Keep coping, powerless redditor.
sex with squid girl de geso
I never noticed how sexy Ika Musume was. She's more beautiful now that ten years ago.
As a Splatoon player, squid kids are really sexy.
Captcha: AY2G0Y
Splatoon characters are really rarted tho. Kind of half way to ponies, too furry already.
How are Inklings any more furry than Ika Musume?
Less natural eyes, more detailed and "animal-like" hair with octopus "suckers". That moves Splatoons a bit closer to animals.
>lust provoking image
Agreed.
At least we have stable diffusion for that. But it isn't as good as I want it to be.
I hear control nets can get pretty good. Its not so easy but at least translating your ideas to art is possible
The Essential Software Freedoms(tm) really need an update for the botnet age.
No software can truly be considered free (as in freedom) without the ability install and run the program without anyone else knowing about it. It must be easy to install and run 100% OFFLINE including optional features.
I know.... I KNOW... this makes all of your precious Linux software non-free; but it's the truth. GNU/Linux software can no longer be considered free until it comes as a 1-click installer that can be stored, and shared with others using 100% offline media. With no chance of dependency fuck ups.
SD is a perfect example of why this needs to happen. It has to be installed online because it's an amalgamation of various downloads. That means there's a record of you downloading every single piece, and some of those pieces don't download until you try to use them. If you've ever gen'd with "fix faces" enabled THEY KNOW.
"0 censorship" now means nothing when they can decide that the software you're running is problematic at any time.
>It must be easy
define "easy".
>to install and run 100% OFFLINE including optional features
If the source is there, you can mod it and remove online callbacks, "easy". That's what Stallman's genius is all about, freedoms established in the 90s still hold true today without introducing limitations resulting in feature disparity against proprietary versions (=size bloat), and unclear concepts like "easy" and "100% offline" (does local repo counts? Why/Why not?).
>SD is a perfect example of why this needs to happen. It has to be installed online because it's an amalgamation of various downloads
Sift through the source code, download all of that locally and replace links to repos.
I expect the retort similar to "no, it can be done because I'm basically retarded and want an easy solution like on my iphone".
You are correct.
SD is not such a perfect example in that regard. For the most part you actually CAN just copy the folder once it's all set up and share that with your friend. They can then just run it from the bash script as long as they have python and appropriate graphics drivers afaik. That makes it a decent example of how I was saying things SHOULD be. Much better than most things on Linux, anyway.
I still think that free software needs to include the freedom to run without trace. Even little things like browsers giving a usage ping by default is a dangerous precedent imo. Of course these things can be fixed by modifying the code as you said, but that shouldn't be a prerequisite for true freedom.
P.S. You are also right in assuming that I do not know how to code lmao
can freetards create a neural net as big and complex as what companies with trillions in funding can buy for themselves?
because if not then AI's a losing game in the long term and your efforts should be in detecting AI slop so companies can't profit off it
>can freetards create a neural net as big and complex as what companies with trillions in funding can buy for themselves?
yes one dude in his basement will do it
sexooooo
>suddenly communism is le good
Come on now
Pedos like you should be in holes (as in in the ground) and there should be absolute 0 penalties for physically and psychologically abusing you.
Just go back to
, dude. You clearly don't fit in here.
child erotic