AI porn is here

Stable Diffusion https://stability.ai/beta-signup-form
"It will be open source under the Apache and MIT licenses, and will likely show up in commercial products as a result"
https://imgur.com/F308yrK
It begins...

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    All those AI models are literally just copyright laundering.

    They pretty much spit out modified versions of their inputs while pretending it was completely generated from scratch.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that's based
      frick copyright and frick anyone who thinks intellectual property is real

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        +1

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based. Copyright is a israeli invention that shouldn't exist.

      Here is a question: would you have AI generate CP for the dark web so that the CP industry dries up and human trafficking becomes unviable, but at the same time you now have an infinite source of CP

      CP industry is a myth, moron.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm pretty sure organized crime largely benefits from human trafficking. Having the same end product without the hassle should kick out the competition in no time, no?

        I could see the moral quandary around being the one to create system for infinite CP though, not many capable would be willing to do that.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >I'm pretty sure organized crime largely benefits from human trafficking.
          With CP production? No, that literally does not happen.

          >Having the same end product without the hassle
          That already exists. It's called "girls voluntarily filming themselves and posting it online for attention".

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          hi Satania

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >CP industry is a myth, moron.
        very real in 2022. it wasn't that long ago in modern history where people were selling cp magazines and films/videos in porn stores in various nations. mail order and international shipping exist so it was prevalent all over the world. some countries biggest selling "adult" porn films during the '60s and '70s involved some form of cp. it has a very long and dark history that people would like to bury and never talk about.

        I'm pretty sure organized crime largely benefits from human trafficking. Having the same end product without the hassle should kick out the competition in no time, no?

        I could see the moral quandary around being the one to create system for infinite CP though, not many capable would be willing to do that.

        >I'm pretty sure organized crime largely benefits from human trafficking
        have a guess who was funding and taking profits off of popular cp films and magazines many decades ago? you'll be pleasantly unsurprised by who it could possibly be.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          What's so dark about people touching each other on camera?
          Selling guns to civilians who then kill each other is a more dark history and people definitely need to talk about it

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You often combine the guns with people touching each other on camera, just in front of a gun

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >What's so dark about people touching each other on camera?
            before the 1980s it wasn't seen as a big deal, but dark and fricked up is how people see it in current year. current history of it gets more disgusting when you discover that various police and government glowie departments have been caught out running websites on tor that they've hijacked from pedos they've busted or they've created their own for "operational" purposes. that's dark like a blackhole.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's shit
      Like this anon said it gets some input mix it with moron filters and tadah you get your "fresh" drawing. AI is a scam.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Here is a question: would you have AI generate CP for the dark web so that the CP industry dries up and human trafficking becomes unviable, but at the same time you now have an infinite source of CP

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm pretty sure organized crime largely benefits from human trafficking. Having the same end product without the hassle should kick out the competition in no time, no?

      I could see the moral quandary around being the one to create system for infinite CP though, not many capable would be willing to do that.

      The CP industry and its sometimes associated human trafficking do not exist.
      They're fabricated by law enforcement/government so they can pretend catching morons who download CP over the clearnet is saving children by the logic of reducing demand means reducing supply.
      Look up any convicted child abusers and they're almost, if not always, abusing them because they want to, not because they need money. Even if people are absolutely desperate for money it is a stupid way of making money- any other illegal activity is more profitable and if you get convicted as a pedo your life both inside and outside of prison is over. Contrast that with being convicted for robbery, theft or fraud and you'd be stupid to start your darkweb Toys-in-Us © child abuse corporation.

      https://i.imgur.com/IWXCWUj.jpg

      Stable Diffusion https://stability.ai/beta-signup-form
      "It will be open source under the Apache and MIT licenses, and will likely show up in commercial products as a result"
      https://imgur.com/F308yrK
      It begins...

      >https://imgur.com/F308yrK
      Top center looks like my ex but with better breasts.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      would this make CP morally correct?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Drawings are already illegal in most countries outside japan

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          lol. too bad drawings are fiction and there's no abuse whatsoever. why are drawings illegal and minors sexualizing themselves on tiktok not?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Drawings aren't morally wrong tho
          It is just people who are moronic, and do not understand why CP is illegal in the first place.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          In my country the law requires there to be a victim for there to be a crime, and the government cannot point anyone who would get hurt by a drawing, so it's legal over here

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            anglo moment

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Source?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_child_pornography

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                hehe guess drawn imaginary e-girl pussy be kinda illegal huh, guess it's over for me.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It's legal in most European countries, SA, USA as long as it's "not realistic" and "no real events related" which means 2D e-girl is legal.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Huhuhu.. I see, I see! Thanks for answer Anon, now I know that I won't get vanned because of my 3 imaginary drawn e-girl images. How about SFM Animated 3D'CG Blender Futa on e-girl PORN?(Not that I have any in my possession) What the frick does ''not realistic'' mean anyways? would that be everything not 2D?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >What the frick does ''not realistic'' mean anyways? would that be everything not 2D?
                Not realistic means representations of real children. Some 2D illegal too (photorealistic picture).
                >How about SFM Animated 3D'CG Blender Futa on e-girl PORN?
                Most 3D is okay as long as it's not traced from real children.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Not realistic means representations of real children. Some 2D illegal too (photorealistic picture).
                I see, I see..(well not really) how would one know if it's le ''representations of real children''? can't they just decide what it is? If it looks too much like someone? like if one were to drawn someones daughter for example(then that would be real life event'' and vannable, but what if someone draws e-girl from some game (which used a real human being to trace them into game..) wouldn't that count as traced of sort?
                >Most 3D is okay as long as it's not traced from real children.
                Like directly? or would above count as vannable, sry am ESL(and stupid) anyways I've got some idea of this now, thanks for the help Anon.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >what if someone draws e-girl from some game (which used a real human being to trace them into game..) wouldn't that count as traced of sort? Like directly? or would above count as vannable
                Dunno I'm not a lawyer
                >sry am ESL(and stupid) anyways I've got some idea of this now, thanks for the help Anon.
                Me too. You're welcome :3

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      AI can't generate things from nowhere, it just creates an amalgamation of things it already saw.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        couldn't you just use the existing massive library the government agency has already collected? Damage being already done, and possibility of making it stop is there

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You just need to dump all the 3d e-girl porn and that's it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Human trafficking ain't going anywhere. As long as there's millionaires and politicians who want to stick their dicks in minors, there will be cartels that kidnap and smuggle them. Whether or not they are filmed is irrelevant.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That is on a totally different scale than the mass-consumed CP that's seemingly out there. Much like a vaccine for Polio doesen't help starving Black folk in africa, getting rid of 99% of it is surely very useful.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          CP is a byproduct of the sex trade, not the other way around.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Is regular porn a byproduct of prostitution? Don't think so.

            I'd imagine you'd only get shitty videos that way anyway, since porn is performed a whole different way than sex. It needs a lot of preparation in itself, rarely profitable as an offshoot.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >CP industry
      You fricking moron, it doesn't exist. It gets shared for free on deep web forums

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think Biden wants pixels on a screen anon....

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why did it take so long?

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How do I deepfake my family members?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You need a couple dozen hours of their face in videos

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        How do I deepfake my family members?

        Jut tell your sister it's for an art project or something

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >3dpd
    Can it make furry porn?

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >not GPL
    into the trash it goes

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    this seems like putting an effort to go several steps back from real porn, which is abundant to say the least.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Just make it male compatible so I can put some celeb faces on it for my own consumption and I’ll pay 10 000 buckaroos for it.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    nah ill keep commissioning furry artists to make my fat girl porn

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Utilizing wetware neural nets is very expensive though, not many can afford that

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > signup-form
    dropped

    > AI thinks women are armless mannequins
    OH NONOONONOOOO

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      To be fair, hands are hard to draw for humans too

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        yes. im assuming that's the case as well. now humans have no arms because it was faster!

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Can't those AIs generate 3D models instead of images? That sounds more useful.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      actual 3d models you can rotate around, not just pictures of 3d models?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    By "industry" they might just mean whoever it is that makes it

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    based

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      on what?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *