Stable Diffusion https://stability.ai/beta-signup-form
"It will be open source under the Apache and MIT licenses, and will likely show up in commercial products as a result"
https://imgur.com/F308yrK
It begins...
AI porn is here
Stable Diffusion https://stability.ai/beta-signup-form
"It will be open source under the Apache and MIT licenses, and will likely show up in commercial products as a result"
https://imgur.com/F308yrK
It begins...
All those AI models are literally just copyright laundering.
They pretty much spit out modified versions of their inputs while pretending it was completely generated from scratch.
that's based
fuck copyright and fuck anyone who thinks intellectual property is real
+1
Based. Copyright is a gnomish invention that shouldn't exist.
CP industry is a myth, retard.
I'm pretty sure organized crime largely benefits from human trafficking. Having the same end product without the hassle should kick out the competition in no time, no?
I could see the moral quandary around being the one to create system for infinite CP though, not many capable would be willing to do that.
>I'm pretty sure organized crime largely benefits from human trafficking.
With CP production? No, that literally does not happen.
>Having the same end product without the hassle
That already exists. It's called "girls voluntarily filming themselves and posting it online for attention".
hi Satania
>CP industry is a myth, retard.
very real in 2022. it wasn't that long ago in modern history where people were selling cp magazines and films/videos in porn stores in various nations. mail order and international shipping exist so it was prevalent all over the world. some countries biggest selling "adult" porn films during the '60s and '70s involved some form of cp. it has a very long and dark history that people would like to bury and never talk about.
>I'm pretty sure organized crime largely benefits from human trafficking
have a guess who was funding and taking profits off of popular cp films and magazines many decades ago? you'll be pleasantly unsurprised by who it could possibly be.
What's so dark about people touching each other on camera?
Selling guns to civilians who then kill each other is a more dark history and people definitely need to talk about it
You often combine the guns with people touching each other on camera, just in front of a gun
>What's so dark about people touching each other on camera?
before the 1980s it wasn't seen as a big deal, but dark and fucked up is how people see it in current year. current history of it gets more disgusting when you discover that various police and government glowie departments have been caught out running websites on tor that they've hijacked from pedos they've busted or they've created their own for "operational" purposes. that's dark like a blackhole.
It's shit
Like this anon said it gets some input mix it with retard filters and tadah you get your "fresh" drawing. AI is a scam.
Here is a question: would you have AI generate CP for the dark web so that the CP industry dries up and human trafficking becomes unviable, but at the same time you now have an infinite source of CP
The CP industry and its sometimes associated human trafficking do not exist.
They're fabricated by law enforcement/government so they can pretend catching retards who download CP over the clearnet is saving children by the logic of reducing demand means reducing supply.
Look up any convicted child abusers and they're almost, if not always, abusing them because they want to, not because they need money. Even if people are absolutely desperate for money it is a stupid way of making money- any other illegal activity is more profitable and if you get convicted as a pedo your life both inside and outside of prison is over. Contrast that with being convicted for robbery, theft or fraud and you'd be stupid to start your darkweb Toys-in-Us © child abuse corporation.
>https://imgur.com/F308yrK
Top center looks like my ex but with better tits.
would this make CP morally correct?
Drawings are already illegal in most countries outside japan
lol. too bad drawings are fiction and there's no abuse whatsoever. why are drawings illegal and minors sexualizing themselves on tiktok not?
Drawings aren't morally wrong tho
It is just people who are retarded, and do not understand why CP is illegal in the first place.
In my country the law requires there to be a victim for there to be a crime, and the government cannot point anyone who would get hurt by a drawing, so it's legal over here
anglo moment
Source?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_child_pornography
hehe guess drawn imaginary e-boi pussy be kinda illegal huh, guess it's over for me.
It's legal in most European countries, SA, USA as long as it's "not realistic" and "no real events related" which means 2D e-boi is legal.
Huhuhu.. I see, I see! Thanks for answer Anon, now I know that I won't get vanned because of my 3 imaginary drawn e-boi images. How about SFM Animated 3D'CG Blender Futa on e-boi PORN?(Not that I have any in my possession) What the fuck does ''not realistic'' mean anyways? would that be everything not 2D?
>What the fuck does ''not realistic'' mean anyways? would that be everything not 2D?
Not realistic means representations of real children. Some 2D illegal too (photorealistic picture).
>How about SFM Animated 3D'CG Blender Futa on e-boi PORN?
Most 3D is okay as long as it's not traced from real children.
>Not realistic means representations of real children. Some 2D illegal too (photorealistic picture).
I see, I see..(well not really) how would one know if it's le ''representations of real children''? can't they just decide what it is? If it looks too much like someone? like if one were to drawn someones daughter for example(then that would be real life event'' and vannable, but what if someone draws e-boi from some game (which used a real human being to trace them into game..) wouldn't that count as traced of sort?
>Most 3D is okay as long as it's not traced from real children.
Like directly? or would above count as vannable, sry am ESL(and stupid) anyways I've got some idea of this now, thanks for the help Anon.
>what if someone draws e-boi from some game (which used a real human being to trace them into game..) wouldn't that count as traced of sort? Like directly? or would above count as vannable
Dunno I'm not a lawyer
>sry am ESL(and stupid) anyways I've got some idea of this now, thanks for the help Anon.
Me too. You're welcome :3
AI can't generate things from nowhere, it just creates an amalgamation of things it already saw.
couldn't you just use the existing massive library the government agency has already collected? Damage being already done, and possibility of making it stop is there
You just need to dump all the 3d e-boi porn and that's it
Human trafficking ain't going anywhere. As long as there's millionaires and politicians who want to stick their dicks in minors, there will be cartels that kidnap and smuggle them. Whether or not they are filmed is irrelevant.
That is on a totally different scale than the mass-consumed CP that's seemingly out there. Much like a vaccine for Polio doesen't help starving morons in africa, getting rid of 99% of it is surely very useful.
CP is a byproduct of the sex trade, not the other way around.
Is regular porn a byproduct of prostitution? Don't think so.
I'd imagine you'd only get shitty videos that way anyway, since porn is performed a whole different way than sex. It needs a lot of preparation in itself, rarely profitable as an offshoot.
>CP industry
You fucking retard, it doesn't exist. It gets shared for free on deep web forums
I don't think Biden wants pixels on a screen anon....
Why did it take so long?
How do I deepfake my family members?
You need a couple dozen hours of their face in videos
Jut tell your sister it's for an art project or something
>3dpd
Can it make furry porn?
>not GPL
into the trash it goes
this seems like putting an effort to go several steps back from real porn, which is abundant to say the least.
Just make it male compatible so I can put some celeb faces on it for my own consumption and I’ll pay 10 000 buckaroos for it.
nah ill keep commissioning furry artists to make my fat girl porn
Utilizing wetware neural nets is very expensive though, not many can afford that
> signup-form
dropped
> AI thinks women are armless mannequins
OH NONOONONOOOO
To be fair, hands are hard to draw for humans too
yes. im assuming that's the case as well. now humans have no arms because it was faster!
Can't those AIs generate 3D models instead of images? That sounds more useful.
actual 3d models you can rotate around, not just pictures of 3d models?
By "industry" they might just mean whoever it is that makes it
based
on what?