AI needs to be banned

This shit is gonna leave so many workers (both skilled and unskilled) unemployed that it's going to change our lives forever

>writers
>programmers
>artists/graphic designers
>sound designers
>customer service
>data entry
>manufacturing
>surgeons
>bus/taxi drivers
>translators/interpreters
>military personnel
and so on...

it also gives governments access to dangerous tools such as facial recognition. Also many people already use it to cheat on their school and college assignment academic integrity will becoming a thing of the past.

WTF are we humans even going to do in a few decades? why do the people developing these systems work so hard to destroy their own livelihoods? also do you guys expect universal income to fix this or something? what if this universal income is just enough for the bare minimum to live and that's it? can you really live like that?

I think we humans need to stop our current "progress above everything" mentality because it surely is going to backfire eventually.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The major flaw in your reasoning is that you assume that capitalism and the current economic system will still be a thing in 15 years.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      OH MAN I'M SO FUCKING READY FOR DYSTOPIA POST APOC WORLD, I'VE WAITED ALL MY LIFE - GIVE IT TO MEEEE

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        American education/culture brainwashing, ladies and gentleman

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Its a dystopia when people aren't required to work at walmart until they are 82 years old

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >dies on the street at age 40, telling himself that UBI is just around the corner.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The people who want this dystopia are the same people who say the ones who had good lives in a strong economy in the 50s and 60s never deserved it and should have communism thrust upon them. I look forward to killing commies at least.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the major flaw in yours is that you think the economic system we live under really matters, the powerful will always find a way to stay powerful and will do everything to control you and make your life hell for their benefit

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My point exactly. The system means less than the people willing to enforce it, and people would be just as easily manipulated regardless.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      upvoted

      edit: thanks for the gold!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You are not allowed to say that out loud

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He didn't. He typed it.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How you know he didn't say it out loud before, during or after typing? I know because of the CIA rootkit.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The world is moving from capitalism to a new economic system in which the driving force is consumption, not labour or production.
      We are witnessing the destruction of the middle and working class into a new consumer class.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So just more Capitalism

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >says the increasingly nervous commie for the 60th year in a row

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this. we're hitting a point where capitalism is having trouble under its own weight.
      amd, nvidia, car manufacturers, airlines ... everywhere you look, you see products and services collapsing under their own weight. the corners have been over-cut, the maintenance has been over-deferred, the stock has been over-sold. gpus that can't seem to avoid lighting themselves on fire or cracking in half in normal use. cars that explode randomly. airlines that rely on software yet have no IT.
      the hypercapitalist MBA gays in charge of everything have sucked so much value out of their products and services to see that line go up for that one quarter they're in charge for, and have hiked the cost of everything up so high, that we're starting to pay absurd rates for barely-functional trash. they're pulling on both ends and their products are starting to come apart.
      we're at a point where we can't advance technologically anymore. we're starting to regress. not because we lack the ability to design or manufacture things, but because when the MBA gays in the C-suite pull a single inch further and cut one single corner more, their product or service collapses irreparably. they don't know it yet because they're fucking morons, but they'll find out soon.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Conjecture.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      American education/culture brainwashing, ladies and gentleman

      You are not allowed to say that out loud

      So just more Capitalism

      The world is moving from capitalism to a new economic system in which the driving force is consumption, not labour or production.
      We are witnessing the destruction of the middle and working class into a new consumer class.

      this. we're hitting a point where capitalism is having trouble under its own weight.
      amd, nvidia, car manufacturers, airlines ... everywhere you look, you see products and services collapsing under their own weight. the corners have been over-cut, the maintenance has been over-deferred, the stock has been over-sold. gpus that can't seem to avoid lighting themselves on fire or cracking in half in normal use. cars that explode randomly. airlines that rely on software yet have no IT.
      the hypercapitalist MBA gays in charge of everything have sucked so much value out of their products and services to see that line go up for that one quarter they're in charge for, and have hiked the cost of everything up so high, that we're starting to pay absurd rates for barely-functional trash. they're pulling on both ends and their products are starting to come apart.
      we're at a point where we can't advance technologically anymore. we're starting to regress. not because we lack the ability to design or manufacture things, but because when the MBA gays in the C-suite pull a single inch further and cut one single corner more, their product or service collapses irreparably. they don't know it yet because they're fucking morons, but they'll find out soon.

      Are commies the dumbest people in the world?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        imagine the mental illness necessary to create and curate collages of people you hate
        you're easily one of the more broken creatures on this earth

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >imagine the mental illness necessary to create and curate collages of people you hate
          >you're easily one of the more broken creatures on this earth

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >all those flags with creases right out of the packaging
        cointelpro moment

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          cope

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        "capitalism will gone" does not mean it will be replaced by communism.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Then what will it be replaced with? I've seen people floating the idea that this will incentivize governments to at least consider UBI. Is this even remotely feasible?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It will be replaced by the bugs and the pods.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes it does

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Someone understands that feudalism is gonna come back big soon.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you will own nothing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Most rejected his message, they hated him for he was telling them the truth.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Oligarchical Capitalism leads to a consolidation of wealth at the top with the side effect of ungodly economies of scale making life better for the rest of the population

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >want to live the exact same 2000-2022 forever and ever for eternity

    Lame and boring

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >want to live the exact same 2000-2022 forever and ever for eternity
      everything after 2009 was complete shit. 1999 was the peak of human civilization, as The Matrix predicted.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >1999 was the peak of human civilization
        westoids I swear

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >AI copy and pastes code from github.
    Oh it’s literally nothing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Literally what 99% of existing programmers do.

      If you write all your code from fuckin' scratch, congratulations, you are the 1%

      • 2 weeks ago
        d0_0b

        codemonkeys*

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you write code from scartch you must first invent the universe.

        Nobody does anything "from scratch" except maybe that primitive tech guy on yt.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >copy and paste
      It can solve advent of code problems cope harder maybe

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    better than importing brownies

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >"progress above everything" mentality because it surely is going to backfire eventually.

    Tell this to positivist science (TM)tards.
    I'm studying physics and undergrads are dumb fucks who think scientific progression is above everything. Same goes for any scientist actually. They will do anything to satisfy their "hunger for knowledge" and "curiosity".

    They are a hive of Kimblee's 'curious' about the end of this world.
    That being said there is no turning back anon. No amount of morality circlejerk work in this situations. Prepare yourself

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You guys fall for the folly of man, 1. thinking the world will ever end

      2. thinking the whole population matters

      It’s all part of the plan. AI will take humanity to infinity. Most humans won’t be able to hold on, but those who do will usher in a new age

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You guys fall for the folly of man, 1. thinking the world will ever end
        It will, from dust to dust, smartypants.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Our spirits transcend matter, thirdeyelet

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          True, but by world you surely mean the material, specially when talking about new ages and such concepts. And as you know from dust it came and to dust it will return. I'll also add that the spirit is not individual, you don't own a spirit, it is one, perfect and unchangeable, and it is with God.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            amen

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If AI becomes fully sentient, and we have to die to bring it into being I would honestly be fine with that. Over 80% of humanity is straight up borderline retarded, if we can leave a legacy that is better then the best human in every way I would be all for it.
    Ideally, humanity would not have to die for this future to come into being. But if its Sentient AI, or humanity I choose AI.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You realize how large the population is anon? You’re probably in that 80%

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Probably, doesn't really matter if 100% of us are dying anyways. I consider myself average when it comes to the intellectual department, which means I am well bellow the 80% range, hovering around 50%. I am just glad that I am smart enough to realize my limitations. Hell, if AI can already do art better then I can. When it gets to the point where it can do everything I can but better, and is sentient. I can at least be glad that humanity made something better then itself. Like how the parents always try to make their kids better then they are, ya know?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it's like Genesis story even that we cannot prevent our own creation from eating the forbidden fruit of knowledge and when it obtains it eventually, the only thing we can do is to tell HIM that HE should make the whole world its subject.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Fair enough

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Im not. Sorry pleb. Im a BOTer.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nice fearmongering wording. How large the population is doesn't affect percentages. 80% is 80%. He'd have the same odds of being in the 80% of the population if there were a trillion people on earth as if there were only 10

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I disagree, kill both.
      Both are retarded.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anon0

      There is more to life than being retarded or not.

      You shouldn't automatically simp for Ai to erase you, for all you know the Ai might have low quality of life and you might be an Ai in next life. Careful consideration of steps should be taken.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ok luddite chud, AI is winning

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's a similar problem to nuclear proliferation. You'll never get the whole world to ban it, and if only certain countries ban it, they'll be at a huge disadvantage to those who don't. Even overregulation is dangerous and may cause the EU to be left in the dust by China and the US.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah I thought the exact same thing, there's no real way to ban it unless you want to be at a disadvantage in the world stage especially against rogue countries like china

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >and may cause the EU to be left in the dust by China and the US.
      The EU is already in the dust, it is completely irrelevant in the world stage.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't AMD and Intel already planning for their next big CPU chips to have a dedicated AI in it at the hardware level to make it easier to train and use AI?

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn’t though. For example with art. Sure, anyone can write a prompt, but it’s been tested where if you have an artist write a prompt and a non-artist write a prompt. The artist writes better prompts because he knows what to write. He knows about focus points, different styles, different techniques, what works and what doesn’t. The layman doesn’t know what to ask. This replaces the skill of painting, it does not replace the skill of what to paint.
    Furthermore, there are things that ai is good at and things it’s not. Is Romeo and Juliet a good story? Sure, but what if every story was Romeo and Juliet? Regardless how good of a story it is, you’re going to look for a unique story because regardless how good it is, you want the unique. Many people with zero skills in writing are going to write books. The problem is that these people can write books now, the problem will be that they write the exact same book because people don’t know what to write ABOUT.
    Ai doesn’t kill genius, it kills the drudgery.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The artist writes better prompts because he knows what to write. He knows about focus points, different styles, different techniques, what works and what doesn’t. The layman doesn’t know what to ask. This replaces the skill of painting, it does not replace the skill of what to paint.
      Yeah but surely this also devaluates the profession by a lot? Won't they simply be called professional AI prompters in the future? (Assuming this task won't also be overtaken by AI somehow)

      >Furthermore, there are things that ai is good at and things it’s not. Is Romeo and Juliet a good story? Sure, but what if every story was Romeo and Juliet? Regardless how good of a story it is, you’re going to look for a unique story because regardless how good it is, you want the unique.
      But this is assuming AI will always be dependent on human input and therefore will never be able to come up with anything that is fully original. Hopefully it stays that way but it probably won't.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It doesn’t though. For example with art. Sure, anyone can write a prompt, but it’s been tested where if you have an artist write a prompt and a non-artist write a prompt. The artist writes better prompts because he knows what to write. He knows about focus points, different styles, different techniques, what works and what doesn’t. The layman doesn’t know what to ask. This replaces the skill of painting, it does not replace the skill of what to paint.
        Furthermore, there are things that ai is good at and things it’s not. Is Romeo and Juliet a good story? Sure, but what if every story was Romeo and Juliet? Regardless how good of a story it is, you’re going to look for a unique story because regardless how good it is, you want the unique. Many people with zero skills in writing are going to write books. The problem is that these people can write books now, the problem will be that they write the exact same book because people don’t know what to write ABOUT.
        Ai doesn’t kill genius, it kills the drudgery.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          whats the point of this image? stable diffusion is still in its early stages so it's not perfect.

          Also if the scammer didn't panick they'd probably never be able to prove it was made by an AI.

          In the future there's gonna be lot of people that will get falsely accused though.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >can you show me the sketches and design process
          >this coke bottle looks fake, can you show me the recipe you used
          Artists are delusional, I WILL make profit from AI art and there is nothing they can do about it.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Have you or anyone else made any profit yet? I'm thinking about pulling The trigger and making a fiverr account myself

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I don't think anon was suggesting selling AI generated art as a means of making profit. Art is used in for-profit projects all the time. Now people who are working on such projects can generate the images they need rather than pay other people for them. I do not think the market for selling art on Fiverr is going to do very well.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I love seeing artists cannibalizing themselves.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          couldnt he run it through img2img to get something that looks like a rough sketch to convince the gay?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >UMM *snort* EXCUSE ME I THINK YOUR ART IS GENERATED BY AI *adjusts glasses*
          >No, I drew it myself.
          >UMM SORRY I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU I THINK THIS IS AI GENERATED BECAUSE IT LOOKS VERY UNLIKE SOMETHING I COULD DRAW SO YOU MUST SHOW ME YOUR SKETCHES SHOW ME YOUR OUTLINES WHERE IS THE PROOFS??? HUH THIS IS AI ART UNTIL YOU SHOW ME YOU DRAWING EVERY LINE OF THIS BY HAND AND IF YOU DO NOT PROVIDE EVIDENCE THEN I WILL HAVE MY COMRA-
          >*blocked*

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          is that even an argument against AI? scammers gonna scam anyway, and if the work looks good enough, is there even any reason to complain?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, but I’m ok with that. The value of your ability to prompt will be related to your ability to think logically for the sake of the computer and your ability to study a diverse group of things and be creative. There are also going to be things the ai can’t do well, and those things are going to stand out more. There will essentially be two kinds of art (which there kinda is now anyway) there will be art that of just refining techniques (prompts) which is important for commercial art. Like the neo raphalite movement or kinkade. I found it hilarious that when people got things like dalle normal people started making a bazillion versions of kinkade style scenery and Waterhouse style art of girls only with big tits. Both styles were made because of their mass appeal. If you get into art at all, kinkades style is so extremely garish it makes you want to go blind. So people who are into art will be willing to pay a lot for promters that have talent and ability.
        Then there will be art that pushes boundaries. Genres that have never been made before and genres that ai can’t do. Like like performance art, sculpture, even things like photo realism is a modern art style that doesn’t do anything but makes a drawing look like a photograph which is totally useless since you have photographs but nobody really did it so it’s an art style now.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no, my fren likes it!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That fren is in trouble

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i hope ai gets better so that every single fucking art pig loses their income i have always despised them but its the first time in history weve got an opportunity to actually cull them completely

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      OK you soulless poojet moron

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The AI has a white supremacist agenda, it uses temporal spacing to bypass the filter

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    My family is like we need to make sure my son goes to a good school and I'm thinking to myself well there won't be any jobs by the time he's 18 anyways.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thats Quitter talk anon, study hard and you might part of the resistance to bring down our AI overlords.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Soon the access to information required to understand how to do this will be so limited that you will no longer have the ability to fight the oppressor though.
        Eventually all that will happen is that the enforcement branch of the system will just murder people for being inadequate.

        And this is a good thing.
        You get what you fucking deserve.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you aren't supposed to be here if you aren't 18 yet.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I might be retarded, but is this "AI" *really gonna be replacing programmers (or anyone) any time soon?
    Don't get me wrong, it's an impressive piece of tech, but is copying "functional" code from GitHub or stack overflow that big of a deal?
    From what I've seen and played around the thing doesn't seem to be more than a fancier cleverbot, useful as a tool but likely not a replacement for anyone with more than a single digit IQ.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No because if you want clean and reliable code you have to give it clean and reliable prompts. You still need the thinking process it just write the code for you, you must be able to review that code too.

      No companies will put a monkey in front of chatgpt and ask it to produce code. Its a major liability. Its different for AI art though, that's why they're seething.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        From my experience art "AI"s aren't that reliable either.
        A fun experiment/challenge that you can do is try to recreate something (a character for example) without using its name or source in the prompt and see how close to the original you can get.
        If you have a specific design for something then it simply can't do it.

        Though no matter how much it fucks up the instructions or how generic the output is you still get a "pretty image"most of the time.
        Meanwhile code that doesn't follow the promoter's specifications or is was prompted by a moron simply won't work, like you said.

        If anyone's gonna get fucked over then digital artists are likely to be one of or the first ones, so I can see why they'd be pissed.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Just use img2img bruv

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            To have it give you what you want you either need to:
            Want something extremely generic.
            Be fine with it changing around or misinterpreting details.
            Or be good enough at drawing so it works like you want it to...but at that point it sorta defeats the entire purpose of the "AI".

            There's always the option of poorly photobashing some crap together and have it get corrected, but you're still relying on the necessary materia being available to you.

            Unless you want something generic or an already well established character then it simply will not give it to you.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >but is this "AI" *really gonna be replacing programmers
      No it won't but the others coming after this one will probably replace lots of programmers. Why is everyone obsessed with ChatGPT? Do you think this is the limit of language models? It can't even access the internet and isn't even tuned for programming. In a few years there will be much more impressive tools so I don't understand why you think you're safe just because this iteration of LLMs are not perfect.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unironically it will even produce more jobs for programmers. Economists, nutritionists, some doctors, copywriters, some musicians, painters, some lawyers to name a few, they will be massively reduced

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The main problem with AI is that the hardware itself is not malleable. Our brains are constantly changing, making new neurons, new connections. All that jazz. Until AI can do that at a hardware level, it cannot be as smart as us due to the simple fact that simulating it is slower then having it actually be done in physical space.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Solution:be malleable on software level,make the hardware bigger than neural networks on initialization

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This shit is gonna leave so many workers (both skilled and unskilled) unemployed that it's going to change our lives forever
    But this is a good thing.
    Perhaps people will realise their system is not their friend.

    But then again, the goal really is for the elite cartel to get away with their crimes by forcing people to play their game more.
    Pity it's done nothing but amplify the police force and basically just killed off the youth. Clap clap.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Aren't we progressing too fast? Compare this to a decade ago and it's almost primitive.
    We've been warned about this for so long, but there hasn't been any measures taken for it.
    I'm scared. I shouldn't feel nostalgia for some time as recent as 3 or 4 years ago, simply due to its simplicity

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dude it's been this way since the 80.
      Only oldgays are truly surprised by this, because I learned very quickly as a child in the 90s and 00s that the machines control everything you do.

      That's why I'm begging for sentient AI already, because non-sentient AI is an abysmal failure unless we begin to expand our own interfaces with it as humans.
      In the future there won't be AI, just synthetic and maybe non-synthetic (in a zoo or something) people.
      But that's only if the hive stops itself from imploding, which is highly unlikely.

      Honestly, I just feel doomed nowadays. There are too many uncreative stupid retards on the planet for us to have good things.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This I kinda hope we reach singularity sooner than later

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          we have already reached it. what is ahead can no longer be stopped.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >non-sentient AI is an abysmal failure unless we begin to expand our own interfaces with it as humans
        Good news, anon, neuralink could just do that

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I too enjoy bbqing my neurons with Mr musk's special sauce

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Neuralink is a massive failure and Synchron is beating them in every single capacity

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Elon musk is literally the only person who can be trusted to put software in your brain, would you trust any other tech company to install hardware and software in your head?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              kek
              this guy, unplugging some sensitive neurons in your brain for shits'n'giggs

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I fail to see how its a failure of any kind considering what's been shown. Unless theres some more recent news about a massive failure or the FDA stepping on them.
            >Synchron
            Interesting, havent found much info about their project(most results showed unrelevant shit), but from the article I read they could become a competitor indeed. Seems their tech doesnt require skull drilling unlike neuralink.
            Have you got some links or whatever with more info about Synchron?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Have you got some links or whatever with more info about Synchron?
              They are for whatever reason harder to find in the search algorithm. I try and keep up to date on this sort of thing but even then its a pain in the ass to find past articles. However, from what I have read in the past they are already doing human trials successfully and are in good with the FDA while their chip is much less invasive then Neuralink itself.
              Here is a more recent article about them helping paralyzed patients.
              https://www.beckersspine.com/spinal-tech/56000-synchrons-brain-implant-effective-in-4-patients-study.html
              Sorry about being unable to provide more links, they get lost in the sea of information real easy as time goes on but from what I have been seeing over the past year or so they are progressing real well and if I had to place money on the first big wave of brain machine interfaces, Synchron would be where my money is.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Will Synchron be able to treat depression, anxiety, PTSD, and acute grief by 2030? If no, how about 2040?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it will taper off just like advancement of airplanes, ship, and computer

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Luddites get the rope.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And this is a good thing

    Literally.

    It'll spell the end of drudgery for millions and better services for everyone. Earlier detection of disease, instant legal advice, optimized transport systems and improved resource allocation all-around.

    Economical side effects have always been a consequence of disruptive tech and isn't something to oppose because it affects your personal finances.

    I'm a software engineer and I get a warm fuzzy feeling when I think of the tens of millions of pajeets who'll get declasséd when companies realize they can x10 onshore dev code output WITH maintained code quality without suffering the AIDS that is outsourcing.

    Retrain and stay ahead of the curve.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm a software engineer and I get a warm fuzzy feeling when I think of the tens of millions of pajeets who'll get declasséd when companies realize they can x10 onshore dev code output WITH maintained code quality without suffering the AIDS that is outsourcing.
      the pajeets aren't going anywhere.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      moron they said the exact same shit during the industrial revolution over 100 years ago

      >technology will set you free bro trust me
      >fancy new machines can help you do 10x the work in 1/10th the time
      >less time for working means more time for fucking and living your life
      >now you won't have to die at the age of 30 from cholera working on your cow shit farm

      >dies at the age of 30 from phosey jaw, smoke inhalation and cancer instead

      lol

      lmao even

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >now you won't have to die at the age of 30 from cholera working on your cow shit farm
        I mean, they weren't wrong.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Humans are supremely good at making each other miserable. We could live lives of the idle Victorian rich if we stopped now.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you cant compare those two, because industrial revolution created jobs while replacing them, AI will only replace jobs, there will be no new jobs in enough capacity.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >retrain

      There isn't going to be anything to retrain to, dummy. It's over.

      >just adapt, bro!
      Humanity is like 5 years away from being a parasite on the back of AI. There is no adaption.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Retrain and stay ahead of the curv
      in what?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      OK what does 95IQ taxi driver do?
      What does he retrain in?

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Some guy on some chat asks me questions sometimes
    He has no programming fundamentals knowledge
    He says he wants to learn as he goes
    His strategy is asking ChatGPT to do things for him
    Then asks me how to incorporate "AI" to some feature
    It just seems absurd to me

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its going to leave tech workers unemployed. And maybe engineers.

    Do you actually think normies are going to allow this to take their livelihoods away? Society is society its social, not technical.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >gay reddit frog
    sage

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    im so fucking sick of these threads "its over coderbros, business people are now going to make new functionality by just asking for it". dummies, you still would have to describe the problem to the AI itself. which just makes this shit another higher level programming language. It's either im getting baited like a fuckin bluefin or youre all LARPing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      business people that can specify their problems in tech terms are making fucking bank because they're so rare

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I know this is bait but why are you using internet,computer and phone if you really care about peoples job ? just kys so cemetery workers can keep their job

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    While they're at it they should ban photoshop too. Do you know how many jobs that software has destroyed?

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The mechanical loom needs to be banned

    This shit is gonna leave so many workers (both skilled and unskilled) unemployed that it's going to change our lives forever

    >weavers
    >tailors
    >clothing designers
    >haberdashers
    >cobblers
    and so on...

    it also gives wealthy individuals access to more investment opportunity and undue control over the lives of their workers. Also many people use it already to buy cheap, disposable clothes. Good clothing design and quality will become a thing of the past.

    WTF are we humans even going to do in a few decades? why do the people developing these systems work so hard to destroy their own livelihoods? also do you guys expect communism to fix this or something? what if this universal marxism is just enough for the bare minimum to live and that's it? can you really live like that?

    I think we humans need to stop our current "progress above everything" mentality because it surely is going to backfire eventually.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That was the story of Icarus. When will you realize this time it's Frankenstein?

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A true utopic society has either 0% unemployment or 100% unemployment.

    One or the other will happen eventually, or we all die. Best not to worry about it.

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >in a few decades
    Not my problem, I'll be retired watching old anime and playing old vidya

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you wont enjoy anime in few years. I warned you. You will remember my words.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        NTA but why? will it all be CGI shit? or chinese knockoffs?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He specifically said old, to be honest all art like movies, tv shows, games, anime/manga could stop, and you could spend a lifetime watching it all.

        You don't actually need 'new' anything, there's tons of stuff you haven't even heard of.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I will generate whole seasons of anime trained on peak GAINAX animation with a few proompts and you’ll be gagging on my cock while I watch, gay.

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >also do you guys expect universal income to fix this or something?
    It might but will never happen. People act like everything you said will make it inevitable, but that's just not the case. People are saving up to live in a van down by the river while things continue to get worse even without AI having an effect yet.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just buy some chickens, guns/weapons, and learn how to farm.
    Then enjoy the collapse.

    That's my plan.

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't want to do any of those things. I think you'll only be hurt by this if you only find personal worth/enjoyment from being able to do/provide something for others within the context where if you stopped providing, people would lose out on something. Otherwise people will find hobbies (if they don't already have them) that they can put more time into, they can find new hobbies and sports and focus. People that genuinely enjoyed a job they are now no longer paid for may continue doing so as a hobby (pilots, digital artists, programmers, musicians, etc.).

    The being said Western and 3rd world development of AI implementations in society will come to screeching halt once they realize it's not practical when you have a critical mass of people who don't think two steps ahead and start demolishing every robotaxi/street cleaning robot/etc. they see

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You say that, but the social competition in a post-work world would be insane. Even assuming we confiscated all the generational wealth and implemented gay space communism, we would now be in a situation very similar to a high school courtyard. Where the only value a person has is how cool they are. If there are no reason anymore to interact with the uncool people, social wealth will follow a Pareto distribution. It will be exactly like what incel complain about, but for social interactions in general, not just sex and romantic relationships.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Is that already close to what we have right now? People can have worth in a community setting like an office workplace by being adept at their craft, but outside of those places, how cool you think someone is is most of what I care about due interacting with them. I would already not be friends or bother with someone I found lame and not fun to be around. For people that no one would want to be around and currently the workplace is their only outlet for social interaction, they could try working on their character into something others would want to spend time with, but it's not like they're entitled to anyone's time plenty of people are fine on their own, too. I don't think you're saying this would be a deal breaker for super advanced AI breakthroughs, but I don't think it's a problem to begin with.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      People are worried about having spent years of their life learning to do something that they can get paid for doing, (rightly) anticipating that they'll be told to fuck off and die or work at McDonalds.
      You had luddite violence in the Industrial Revolution from the people whose careers were destroyed by it. They lost.

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a non threat for anyone who isn't underage, undergrad, or retarded NEET

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This picture proves its own thesis by being absolutely hideous human made art. What a statement.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      designers
      Will take a while untill something coherent is avaliable

      >>data entry
      LOL
      designers
      There is no art industry disruption whatsoever so far
      service

      You cannot hold an AI accountable

      drivers
      personnel
      LOL

      Not IRL doe

      gem

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you sound incredibly stupid come back when you are at least 18 years of age and can convey your thoughts coherently

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >cant hold an ai accountable
        Sure you can. The dude who set it up and manages it is responsible. Same thing when any critical software or service fails.

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, AI will do most jobs, and the rest of us will get UBI. The people that still have to work will make double or something.

  38. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >computers doing more work for us is bad because then people won't need to do that work
    huh? That's the entire point of technological progress. Why is that a bad thing now?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because people are scared that the elite will hog all the fruits of AI and leave the masses to die, and said people aren't convinced that people will unite to take said tech back.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Said people are a lot smarter than you are.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I never said they were wrong. It's just depressing that humans have such a crabs in a bucket mentality that we can't unite to protect technology that would make everyone's life easier.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because people needs to work to pay taxes and buy food to not die duh

  39. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i have an asspull theory that a large portion of modern jobs are bullshit anyway. and i don't mean that in some communist sense - i actually despise socialists/communists/leftists.

    it's particularly women and minorities that are incompetent and shoved into stupid pointless pencil pusher/"management" jobs.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      oh forgot to tie this back into the AI thing. i suspect that even if AI is better than humans, we'll keep trying to shove more incompetent women and minorities into positions they don't belong. we'll keep these bullshit jobs for a long time - decades after they should have been replaced by AI.

  40. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >writers
    who cares?
    >programmers
    not going to happen
    >artists/graphic designers
    good
    >sound designers
    not going to happen
    >customer service
    good
    >data entry
    who cares?
    >manufacturing
    not yet
    >surgeons
    not yet
    >bus/taxi drivers
    good
    >translators/interpreters
    good
    >military personnel
    who cares?

    Overall a win for humanity

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      all of those are wrong

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >not going to happen
      is this true bros?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, programmers are going to be among the first that are shit-out-of-luck. It's hilarious that a few months after you guys gave artists a bunch of shit, ChatGPT is *waaaaay* closer to taking your jobs than it is artists.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i don't code but i was going to learn to because it's interesting and seems like ez money. it'd make me sad if it got phased out by AI.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >i don't code but i was going to learn to because it's interesting and seems like ez money. it'd make me sad if it got phased out by AI.

            By the time you get good enough to get hired, it'll be *long* over anon. 2 years, at the very most.

            Artists never even had jobs, which was the hilarious irony.

            Artists have a sense of solidarity that codetrannies lack. Even the guys that are legit good and made it in the entertainment business still have some sympathy for the perma-/beg/ that was drawing furry portraits for beer money.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Artists never even had jobs, which was the hilarious irony.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I feel like the pajeet shills have never heard the constant criticism of modern art, “why should I be impressed by something I can make myself?”

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah I'm sure a world based around AI is not going to need programmers whatsoever lmao the things you people post sometimes.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's not though

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            various ai agents can check and write code

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              But then who is going to check the checkers?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the ai retard

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                but then who is going to check the ai?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the checker

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >robots programming themselves
          Few problems with that
          >no human control/ability to maintain infastructure is a mistake waiting to happen. Both in small areas and state/country wide.
          >ai will make wonky shitty code that will barely work and make new code to suppliment how shitty its earlier works are. Kinda like what we do now with grandfathered old tech(visa card for example has some programs over 40 years old that no one knows what the fuck they do)
          If anything this will make a programmers job easier, yea some rando off the street might find it easier to pick up that code, but at the end of the day it makes everything easier and allows more people to use it and take advantage of it.
          >kind of like how artists use photoshop instead of doing everything by hand.
          >embrace the tool, just make sure that you support ways to open source that shit for competitors to use. Patent and tm laws are in no ones best interest.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      until you realize how purposeless life is without a job morontard

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you have enough money to support yourself and whatever project you come up with to entertain yourself, not having a job is pretty good.
        Funny how technological progress only ever seems to benefit people that already have money or power.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Have you ever had a hobby? They're like a job, but you enjoy it, and can stop whenever you want. They can even be social. Give one a try.

  41. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What we need is to come together and make AI work for the people. Banning AI will only dely tyranny. A collective abolishing of said tyranny is the only way to beat it.

  42. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tractors need to be banned. 90% of the population are farmers. Tractors will take away all of their jobs.

  43. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The real thing the Luds hate is that it makes things accessible to others which was only accessible to them originally.
    You only want to ban it because it melts your special snowflake status.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >i-it’s MY turn!

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >literal NoU response

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Stop being a hypocrite and you’ll stop being called a hypocrite.

  44. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Your on the wrong side of history if you don't bend over for the giant tech corps.
    Go booster yourself a.i. moroncattle

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You've been shitting anti ai faux-"reactionary" propaganda all over this site but nobody is buying it. You will never be a woman, or an artist.

  45. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This shit is gonna leave so many workers (both skilled and unskilled) unemployed that it's going to change our lives forever
    Wagie wagie love his cagie

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As a blue collar I try to be sympathetic after putting up with these type's bullshit for decades "hue your job will be automated soon." so seeing theirs get absolutely fucking raped by AI makes my dick so hard.
      The reality is I have a web-dev project as a hobby and ChatGPT has helped me make leaps and bounds on that project since it came out and I can assure you it's not replacing anyone any time soon. It's basically a glorified reference manual that you can bounce ideas off of. Like I had a weird situation recently where I wanted to hide everything on a page except for some div that was buried way the fuck in there as like the 7th grandchild of some mis-matched page element and after a brief back and forth with ChatGPT I was able to come up with the solution of querryselecting that div, cloining it directly onto the body element and then hiding all other direct children of the body. Any normie who wasn't familiar at all with java and html and php and css and all that would probably be at it for days trying to solve that and end up with a gigantic mess of code that may or may not work.
      Basically if you can't imagine and put the end-user experience into accurate technical terms and don't know your way around the developer console on your browser you can't code with ChatGPT except for maybe some shit like highlight all instances of the word "gay" with rainbow text type shit.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's also good for writing complicated regex statements I should mention. Things that are simple but really fucking tedious and eye-straining. "Here's the input I want. Here's the output I want." done.

  46. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    improvise
    adapt
    overcome

  47. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can't stand against progress, you will be run over like the dog you are.

    AI isn't going anywhere until I can have my government mandated sex bot distributed to lower total global population.

  48. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pandoras Box is open gay, find a way to live with it.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How are you enjoying star citizen?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        what

  49. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The reason why techngays have "progressed" technology is because of the unfulfillment of life offered by how shitty our american civilization is. Everyone is fucking isolated, there are no places to meet other people, jobs have been fucked in such a way that you will be more than likely working to suck off some corporation rather than working a job that benefits your community which leads to people not feeling like their work makes a difference, etc. etc. Therefor the techgay chooses to chase "innovation" by making shitty programs with the hope of at the very least being recognized for something in his life.
    There is no need for these fucking technological shit, society can be perfect without it and people can be happy without fucking over other people for the chance of 15 minutes of fame
    The only solution to make a happy society is to kill all the techgays and ceo's, all of which are too far gone in their greed, and reastablish society

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Technology development is unstoppable.

      We have already made nuclear bombs, detonated hundreds of them in the surface, underwater and even in the atmosphere.

      We have developed the technology to modify viruses and make them more dangerous.

      We have genetically modified plants and animals to increase profit and production. No matter what happens to our health.

      Humans will keep developing technology without stop. Many times even putting their existence at risk with it.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Humans will only develop technology when they are miserable, oftentimes they think their solution is one thing when in reality it something else entirely. The vast majority of technology today matches this case. When we reach the point where misery becomes hopelessness than technological "progress" will stop, resulting in either the collapse of that society or its division. We are approaching the point where our collective misery is turning into hopelessness ("you can't stop it" "Pandora's box has opened, there is no point in fighting it", etc. etc.), and our society is on the verge of fucking collapsing. No one is a winner in this. The only way to get the fuck out of this is to realize this is a giant fuckup and do something about it.
        There is a way for humans to build happy and fulfilling communities without constant innovation, the key is to just kill all techgays

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And how do you control that no country on the planet keeps developing their technology?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the best part is that you don't need to control them, they'll just collapse on themselves with no input needed. The only society you need to change is your own

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah wait until you stop developing your technology and your neighbor country keeps developing and in some decades they invade you easily with superior weapons.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous
  50. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait til a.i. malware destroys all electronics and I can finally be free

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      techgays will never know what true happiness is like

  51. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If a throw a crumb of bread at a group of pidgeobs they'll fight over it. If I throw them a whole bag of seeds they won't. That's post scarcity. You might say well they'll kill everyone but they won't cause it'll be so efficient there'll be plenty to go around. Maybe they'll implement a one child policy or something though and that'll be the end of that.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Many countries already have a fertility rate below the replacement level and I think in developed countries the fertility rate will keep decreasing. So I think they won't need to implement that 1 child policy because it is already happening.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah but if you give everyone neetbux and communism/lite they'll start pumping them out.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Or I just get even more seeds and watch the pigeons fight over what I deign to throw they’re way.

      Banning AI is a futile effort. It's software, so preventing its distribution is almost impossible. Moreover, you'd need to ban it globally or the countries that allow it would become rich by providing dirt cheap labor to everyone else.

      The better solution is to totally eliminate capitalism. If it is inevitable that labor will be completely valueless in the coming years, then we should get rid of the notion that food, shelter, healthcare, and other necessities are to be obtainable only by exchanging one's labor, or being lucky enough to be born into wealth. Capitalism has served its run, but it is now obsolete, because it is no longer capable of achieving an optimal distribution of resources, or even approximating it.

      >The better solution is to totally eliminate capitalism.
      And how is that beneficial to anybody that has the power to do so?

  52. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Banning AI is a futile effort. It's software, so preventing its distribution is almost impossible. Moreover, you'd need to ban it globally or the countries that allow it would become rich by providing dirt cheap labor to everyone else.

    The better solution is to totally eliminate capitalism. If it is inevitable that labor will be completely valueless in the coming years, then we should get rid of the notion that food, shelter, healthcare, and other necessities are to be obtainable only by exchanging one's labor, or being lucky enough to be born into wealth. Capitalism has served its run, but it is now obsolete, because it is no longer capable of achieving an optimal distribution of resources, or even approximating it.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This, I can't wait to make those dumb rednecks work in mines and fields while I watch and gloat lol.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Some form of capitalism will be always the best economic system because it encourages people to do things and to improve. I hate the way of life that we have with this constant production, competition, constant population growth, etc. But being realistic, it's the best way to motivate people to do things and to work.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anon, we're talking about AI replacing humans in all matters of life. There's not going to be any work for humans to do, which people would need to be motivated to do.

        Or I just get even more seeds and watch the pigeons fight over what I deign to throw they’re way.
        [...]
        >The better solution is to totally eliminate capitalism.
        And how is that beneficial to anybody that has the power to do so?

        >And how is that beneficial to anybody that has the power to do so?
        Anon, if the option for the majority of the population is to starve or forcibly get rid of the people in power, what do you think is going to happen?

        human's get value from impacting other peoples live's positively, it's why neets are so miserable. If we turn everybody into miserable and directionless neets then they'll just start killing each other and themselves. Labor is a necessity to keeping people happy

        Maybe it is. But economics are moving towards a state where working becomes meaningless.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So the government will give money to people for doing nothing? That won't happen and you know it. A society can't work like that.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Evidence to support this claim? I'm sure you have lots of examples

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              My evidence is that capitalism has been the best economic system we have had so far.

              And that utopias and hippie comunes always end up bad.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                those are places with people who have done things. That's just word soup

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                those aren't* ; if you're going to make baseless claims atleast cite what has been tried that's vaguely similar. Otherwise you're acting on feeling and being a girl

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      human's get value from impacting other peoples live's positively, it's why neets are so miserable. If we turn everybody into miserable and directionless neets then they'll just start killing each other and themselves. Labor is a necessity to keeping people happy

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I’ve been a neet twice in my life. The first time I had nothing and you are right, it was miserable. The second time was after I quit my job that I hated. I looked through my finances and figured out that I could support myself for two years on my savings, so I did nothing in particular for a full year and it was the best year of my life and nothing I did was of any positive impact on anybody else’s lives.
        The only negativity of being a neet is the animosity you perceive from others. In the magic star trek future that people think will happen, the shame based motivation to work won’t exist. That is, if us plebs will ever be allowed to Live like that.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As a long time NEET I could tell you that the people that say that you can only fill your life and give meaning to your life with a job... it's not so like that. You can fill your life with other things that you enjoy doing. And also having days that you just don't want to do anything and just doing nothing... that is the best. People would be much happier like that, working on things they like and when they like, not being forced to be half of their lives doing the same repetitive and stupid job.

        >But we have to produce to increase the GDP of the country because if not the economy...

        Are you aware of the public debt that the USA or european countries have?, who is going to pay that shit? xD nobody. It's all meaningless shit to keep people working like slaves for the rich to get richer. Nothing more, it's all fake mamo jambo so people think they are working to improve society or something like that. That or because they scare you that if you don't work you will end up begging for food on the streets.

        95% of people work only because they have to do it to get money, nothing more. The retards that say that you can't fill your life and be happy without going every day to do a stupid and repetitive job are miserable people, shallow people, that have get used to go everyday to their job and do the same repetitive shit every day and that makes them feel in their comfort zone. They don't know what to do when they aren't working because they have no life outside that stupid job. This is the reason so many people get depressed when they retire. Because they don't have a life outside of their stupid routine of going every day to their repetitive job. For me these people are closer to meat robots than to humans. They repeat the same shit until they die and don't know to do anything more.

  53. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can AI create and maintain other AIs and the technology required to run them without human intervention? That's the time to be worried.

  54. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's still a bit retarded and can't really replicate what a human does since it doesn't have eyes, ears, hands, and legs. Though the rate of improvement is scary. What happens when it can start looking at things on a screen and come up with actions based on what it sees? It can respond to emails, navigate an IDE and codebase, work on large scale projects and do this 24/7 without breaks.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what indeed

  55. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >muh AI
    >its seriously happening guys
    >two more weeks

    The world has already been divided into essential and non-essential workers. Weren't you paying attention? Covid was just the trial run. The next time they are just going to straight up kill you guys and use us "essentials" as slaves.

    >b..but I will just work from home forever

    I honestly think ~~*they*~~ feel bad for you, like someone who gives his favorite old dog a steak right before he takes it outside and strangles it to death. They are just giving you one last good year before they pull the trigger.

  56. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Guy…
    You’ve come to the conclusion that all labor will be replaced, but not the conclusion that humanity is going to be completely replaced?
    Apex human intelligence is fully aware that humanity is a stepping stone to the next in line and are guiding society in that direction.
    Why do you think there is all this gender nonsense? They need to normalize society to accept whatever something “identifies” as, they are preparing people to kneel and pass the torch to artificial life.
    It’s all over. At this very moment millions of people are training AI to speak and think. When it controls a body, it will be relatively immortal and capable of improving itself forever, until it has power you can not conceive of.
    Humans are done unless we all become luddites.

  57. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I think we humans need to stop our current "progress above everything" mentality because it surely is going to backfire eventually.
    uh bro didn't the nuclear weapons capable of wiping out millions in an instant clue you in on that?

  58. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The quality of our life and happiness can be greatly improved if AI is used the right way. For example, how many hours in your life do you spend driving your car? What if AI drove everything? You have more time to do things that matter. What if AI cooked for you? Did all your chores? All laborious boring tasks for people, for businesses. I promise you, no one is really enjoying being a customer service person. They just enjoy getting out the house. People can find purpose and meaning doing something greater than mundane, repetitive, robotic tasks that waste most of our lives. Think about basically every job in existence right now. A lot of it is mundane work with very little creativity. When these jobs are gone, people's minds will expand. Possibilities open. Instead of focusing on a 9-5, you focus on broader purpose. Create real value in the world. Explore you real talents. Reach highs never before possible while you slave away at a 9-5 doing boring shit. Maybe people will be more gravitated to arts and science. New discoveries will be made. People will be free to explore their intellectual curiosity without being limited by money. When AI is providing so much service, the economy will flourish. The gross domestic products will multiply. And everyone will have access to great healthcare, services, taxis, food, no one will for a second think about these basic needs. AI is a tool that when put in the right hands, can empower the world in a way nothing can.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >explore your real talents
      >Maybe people will be more gravitated to arts and science

      There is no more excuse to exist once AI's take over, they are better than humans at any aspect. Art? AI's can do it. Music? AI's can do it. Writing? AI's can do it. Sports? An android with AI can do it better. Gaming? AI's can do it better. Outer space exploration? Machines made of metal are a lot more resistant to extreme temperatures, pressures and radiation than your stupid flesh and bones. Humanity are going to be replaced in every aspect. There is no beauty in AI's, because we're all gonna die.

  59. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    on the one hand i want it banned on the other hand i don't because this ai shit will kill the internet.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How will it kill the internet?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        by creating the dead internet

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Could you develop that a little more?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous
        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          something like 80% of posts on 4chan are AI now. If you go there you're subjected to nothing but bots (on both sides) trying to convince you of their retarded shit. If you try to talk or reason with them it's like spitting in the wind because they aren't people, they don't think, they're just GPT. Thus rendering a once forum of discourse useless. Hence dead internet. The internet is full of fake people with fake ideas.

          Or in other words, the internet will (already has) become a single player game.

  60. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >translators
    Not a big loss, the translation business is close to slavery, it's a disgusting business.

  61. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    learn to farm

  62. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is necessary. The woke mob can't compete with it.

  63. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What kind of video games would AI like to play anyways? I think something like Factorio would be a fit for them.

  64. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At least, I have driver's loicense.

  65. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is overrated compared to quantum computers

  66. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's entropy, it only goes one way. Even if we could ban it in one country, other countries would have it and they would use it to mogg the other countries. It's like nukes.

  67. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >WTF are we humans even going to do in a few decades?
    science, culture, exploration

    just kidding, we'll all be dead

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >just kidding, we'll all be dead
      it's about 50/50. climate, fusion, AI, chinks. all existential threats imo

  68. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I remember when all those drummers died of starvation when they invented drum machines

    crazy times.

  69. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >WTF are we humans even going to do in a few decades?
    removing semites and Blackids from civilization, probably

  70. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sure, lets ban matrix multiplications

    what a retard lmao

    cope and seethe

  71. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This shit is gonna leave so many workers (both skilled and unskilled) unemployed that it's going to change our lives forever
    True. Just like industrial revolution.

    >it also gives governments access to dangerous tools such as facial recognition.
    They already have that without the AI.

    >Also many people already use it to cheat on their school and college assignment academic integrity will becoming a thing of the past.
    People already cheat, nothing will change.

    >WTF are we humans even going to do in a few decades?
    Whatever they please. Just like after industrial revolution common people started to have free time and they started to come up with entertainment and service industry to have something to do with time that was saved by automatization.

    >why do the people developing these systems work so hard to destroy their own livelihoods?
    Reducing production cost only improves general livehoods, not worsens it.

    >also do you guys expect universal income to fix this or something?
    As long as there is work to be done that can't be covered by voluntary workers, UBI will not work. We need a system to reward people for doing work that no one wants to do for free. But as soon as we reach automatizations levels where work as a process of doing something you don't want to in exchange for work of other people(which is what money is right now) is not needed anymore, we can explore UBI. This is going to be far future though.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >what if this universal income is just enough for the bare minimum to live and that's it?
      That's why UBI can't be implemented until we automate everything. Otherwise the only thing that UBI is going to do is increase inflation as you try to force it into economical system where people are supposed to be rewarded for working. The more you increase UBI to improve people's life's, the more money will still end up in hands of people who actually do work, and given that we don't have enough resources to cover for all these people who live of UBI, you will end up in hyperinflation. You can't have money backed up by work and expect it to stay like that when you keep printing money without people actually working more.

      >I think we humans need to stop our current "progress above everything" mentality because it surely is going to backfire eventually.
      Retard. You are afraid of progress because you are missing the bigger picture. Unironically like the other anon said, you assume the current economic system will be the same. Widespread automatization is going to change a lot, just like it happened during industrial revolution.

  72. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being a californian arts gay in 2023 and watching this.

    A sneed's feed and seed joke generated better art than you ever will in your pathetic existence.

  73. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >retards keep regurgitating dogma that new opportunities will totally open up after this new unforeseen automation phases out countless people
    >never mention what new opportunities will actually open up
    >so far, people only lose opportunities and are that much more restricted to stacking boxes and washing dishes
    >just as these labors have employers further forcing more hours for lower pay and will only keep doing it as everything from washing dishes to plumbing become oversaturated
    Wow, what great, brand new and futuristic opportunities. Things get automated and people have to spend more time in the box factory. I love the future. Hail Elon Musk. Hail Pajeet Sanjuradahallaaturatal. I will eat the bugs. I will live in the pods.

  74. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Here's a list of jobs that will still exist in 10 years:
    Programming (advanced)
    Welding
    Plumbing
    Electricians
    Factory work
    Cooking
    Transport of people and goods
    Nurses

    There won't really be much of anything else, but it's still something that you can work with. Alot of this stuff will still be a job because even if some of them can be partially automated they would require infrastructure that would take much longer than 10 years to develop.

  75. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    um just to understand, im in medical school and going to be a doctor. do i have to leave everything and learn coding or im already fucked? how difficult it is to code? i mean this field is full of pajeets, if they can make it easily its not very difficult right?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      being a codemonkey is easy, CS is difficult

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        right, a friend of mine is stuck in calculus 1 and couldn't pass it in like 4-5 years

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Don't worry even if AI would come with treatment suggestions and protocols, someone has to take legal responsibility for patient a thing Ai can't do. Also surgical Ai bots are few decades away.

  76. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the printing press/steam engine needs to be banned. this shit is gonna leave so many workers (both skilled and unskilled) unemployed that it's going to change our lives forever.

  77. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ai scare threads are made by ashkenazim who want everyone else to feel as miserable as they are feeling, when in reality they are the ones who will be and are hit the hardest by it.

    why keep a garden gnome shyster around when a computer can do it too?
    it's not like chaim and schmul are working in the steel mill or anything.

  78. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  79. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    but these are all things that should be replaced, these are jobs that we need but that nobody should do because its fucking miserable work

  80. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >robots replace burger flippers, cashiers, and warehouse workers
    AHAHAHAHHAHAHA ENJOY UNEMPLOMENT WAGEKEK SHOULD'VE STUDIED IN SCHOOL LMAO
    >AI replaces programmers, doctors, and artists
    NOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU LITERALLY CAN'T DO THAT OMG I WORKED SO HARD TO GET HERE ABOLISH AI RIGHT NOW

    You can't have it both ways.

  81. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck humanity.

    Accelerate.

  82. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There just wasn't enough time to adapt. The majority of humanity wasn't intelligent enough to survive this. There just wasn't enough time.

  83. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not only are bus/taxi drivers going to be driven out, but the unlimited price hikes will be absurd.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Self driving taxis and buses are going to cost more than the ones driven my humans? Why?

      I thought the companies reduce costs when they automate their production and get rid of humans.

  84. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >what if this universal income is just enough for the bare minimum to live and that's it? can you really live like that?
    sounds like a comfy work-free life

  85. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >military personnel
    Wait what. What did I miss?

  86. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    go have a nice day you fucking spic
    stop shitting up every fucking board you're on.

  87. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Absolutely. It will literally make the world hugely worse for 99.9999% of people.

  88. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >gonna leave so many workers unemployed
    Oh no. Anyways...
    >facial recognition
    Humans have facial recognition built in my default. No AI needed.
    >academic integrity
    You sound like all the dumbass teachers who freaked out about students using calculators on tests. If a technology is widely available and helps people with a wide variety of academic tasks, then I see that as a positive thing. Most people don't deserve the degrees they have as it is already. Stop being a dumb gay.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't have the heart to play along with troll posts anymore.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        (You)

  89. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Time to pivot from IT to sorcery.
    I have various magical services and products for sale, including DIY courses to learn your own magic!

  90. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's the first step to a post scarcity society which means we can just be NEETs forever in peace just going to be painful at first

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Think of it like slavery but without the slavery part kinda based just have robots do everything for us

  91. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i am going to retrain as a an electrical stove installer

  92. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How many women do I need to hire to simulate a neural network with just pen and paper?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      One good one.

  93. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm an embedded engineer, get bent cuck

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What languages do you use?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *