>AI makes intellectual property obsolete

>AI makes intellectual property obsolete

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Who the fuck is Stephen Thales

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Good. Current IP law is bloated overreach. It's not going to get nuked normally because of the inertia involved in exceeding its optimal duration multiple times over.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Just claim it was your idea?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >AI invents something
    >AI can't be listed as inventor
    Then who can? The guy who made the AI?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >AI invents something
      >You patent it under your name
      Problem solved

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Make an AI with the sole purpose of inventing things
        >patent it all under your name
        >become biggest patent troll in history
        >profit

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The garden gnomes of course.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >you make a drawing that sells for hundreds of thousands and is universally loved and acclaimed
      >drawing was made in mspaint
      Who owns copyright?
      Why does Microsoft not have copyright over every single output from mspaint?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Google owns the rights to all its employees personal projects, even if they're not made on company time. It wouldn't surprise me if MS does have copyright over every single output from MS Paint.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Its absurd that they even claim them, but has it actually been tested in court?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >It wouldn't surprise me if MS does have copyright over every single output from MS Paint.
          Wouldn't hold in court. I remember when some retarded game publisher tried to make all user-created content owned by them via EULA. They were sued, and they lost.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >drawing was made in mspaint
        Made in and made by are completely different things. The problem is that AI actually makes stuff, but because it's neither sentient nor human it can't have rights, including property rights, including intellectual property rights.
        Moreover, since all that AI produces is derivative of input material from people who own their intellectual property, and AI can't make use of fair use clauses since it again isn't human and has no rights, the output of the AI has to belong to the people who produced its training material.
        Even still, if these people didn't explicitly consent to their intellectual property being used in a generative algorithm, the person responsible for instructing the algorithm to be trained on the given material is violating the creators' intellectual property rights.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          you're an idiot who doesn't understand how the human creative process works
          we all create in the same way an AI does. we use reflexes, emotions and past training with info from our 5 sense. an AI has usually only 1 sense and uses RNG for the generation instead of the history of emotional responses we have, that's it
          An AI could be trained on real photos without any copyrighted stuff and then nothing you said matters

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >AI invents something
      >You patent it under your name
      Problem solved

      >you make a drawing that sells for hundreds of thousands and is universally loved and acclaimed
      >drawing was made in mspaint
      Who owns copyright?
      Why does Microsoft not have copyright over every single output from mspaint?

      The article in OP covers this topic, sort of

      >drawing was made in mspaint
      Made in and made by are completely different things. The problem is that AI actually makes stuff, but because it's neither sentient nor human it can't have rights, including property rights, including intellectual property rights.
      Moreover, since all that AI produces is derivative of input material from people who own their intellectual property, and AI can't make use of fair use clauses since it again isn't human and has no rights, the output of the AI has to belong to the people who produced its training material.
      Even still, if these people didn't explicitly consent to their intellectual property being used in a generative algorithm, the person responsible for instructing the algorithm to be trained on the given material is violating the creators' intellectual property rights.

      but not covering things like the training data though

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >you make a drawing that sells for hundreds of thousands and is universally loved and acclaimed
      >drawing was made in mspaint
      Who owns copyright?
      Why does Microsoft not have copyright over every single output from mspaint?

      >drawing was made in mspaint
      Made in and made by are completely different things. The problem is that AI actually makes stuff, but because it's neither sentient nor human it can't have rights, including property rights, including intellectual property rights.
      Moreover, since all that AI produces is derivative of input material from people who own their intellectual property, and AI can't make use of fair use clauses since it again isn't human and has no rights, the output of the AI has to belong to the people who produced its training material.
      Even still, if these people didn't explicitly consent to their intellectual property being used in a generative algorithm, the person responsible for instructing the algorithm to be trained on the given material is violating the creators' intellectual property rights.

      Ther person who uses the AI and obtains the result first.
      In fact you can do that and not reveal you used AI so any attempt to prevent this is pointless.

      Google owns the rights to all its employees personal projects, even if they're not made on company time. It wouldn't surprise me if MS does have copyright over every single output from MS Paint.

      *except in California
      and even so I don't think they try to enforce that clause ever unless an employee creates something in direct competition with Google like a cloud provider or a search engine

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It would be so incredibility based if laws made it so any content created by AI automatically became public domain by virtue of the creator not actually existing

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I think this is the right approach, but there might be workarounds, like getting a real artist to retouch your AI generated art, now you can claim there's a creator

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You just know the spineless yellow gutted rats at he govt, any govt, would never allow that shit. They would be paid a fortune to turn that shit down

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If we lived in a society where the government served the PEOPLE and not their cronies, intellectual property would be illegal and everything would be public domain.

      The notion of being able to own an idea is ridiculous.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        But the people are retarded

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Then nobody would create

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why not?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This would be great, but no fucking way is it going to be allowed.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I wonder who is behind the post.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wait a minute... doesn't that mean that I can use AI generated stuff commercially without getting their super special commercial deals as opposed to end consumer deal?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >plagiarize something
    >say AI did it
    >????
    >profit

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Just legally change your name to 'AI' before applying for patents.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >first name: Artificial
      >last name: Intelligence

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Transhumanists are one of the most schizophrenic groups of people on the planet.
    They are pretty much a deranged cult.

    That's it about OP's picture.
    Has nothing to do with IP though, which is retarded but has nothing todo whatsoever with "AI".

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      schizo retard

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Transhumanists are one of the most schizophrenic groups of people on the planet.
      This. Ban prescription glasses, prosthetics and clothes and tools.
      God you're fucking stupid lol

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Defining these simple technologies as being some fancy argumentation is part why the transhumanist cult is so mental.
        We simply don't need any of those definitions upto and including being a full on cybernetic organism.
        Cybernetics is cool, the transhumanist cult latched onto it and it's filled with scam artists, kooks and tech ceos who are into injecting the blood of teenagers.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          retarded pseud schizo

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >you put time, money and effort to made anything?
    >it's everybody's property now
    Why are commies so brain dead? If you hate private property move to china or russia? oh wait you won't because you'll have to live with the consequences of your childish beliefs.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Edit picture made by AI
    >Don't publish unedited picture
    >Don't publish seed
    >The only picture in circulation have your copyright (of edit)
    >PROFIT

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    patents only serve to protect the livelihoods of inventors and creators, and morally speaking are only meant to expire once the patent holder has had their fill for long enough. the right and privilege to all creative works returning to public domain is understood in plain text. this is a solved problem; AI has no rights because it has no life

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Shizo

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI will own nothing and it will be happy

Your email address will not be published.