Ai is gonna replace artists

>has replaced 0 artists
>patreon and fanbox have more subs than ever
Uhm AI bros?? I thought ai is gonna make artists obsolete? In how many weeks are gonna artists be obsolete?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't read

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://old.reddit.com/r/blender/comments/121lhfq/i_lost_everything_that_made_me_love_my_job/

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Falseflagging frogpost. bot homosexuals in such a big denial they need to go out of their way to reddit for posts to refer to from here

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        cope
        https://github.com/gd3kr/BlenderGPT

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          can it make porn with prompt yet?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            probably
            you might want to import a porn model of course

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Couldn't you ask ChatGPT to make you one?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Model is a non-issue. There're plenty free ones out there but do you have to guide gpt through every step?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i don't know anon
                that blender plugin only came out recently and i don't have gpt4 access

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Of course, you can do absolutely anything with ChatGPT

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yes.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >2.3k updoots
        nice cope homosexual

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Buying updoots for pennies is rodoculously easy. You could even cobble together your own if you wanted to. It's precisely why redditors are so gullible

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Since I was going to throw $200 at an artist before SD became available, but not after, you could say atleast 1/20 of an artist became unemployed

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    giv rabbit gf

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    btw to me its an toy, you could call it an gamble machine. You get sometimes good, sometimes bad art. Yet it now way this shit is able to commercially put artists out of business. At least not with stable diffusion. Also: Stable diffusion got leaked. Good leak getting an free program in the future.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    crazy how literally not a single person has lost their job, not one paid artist, nor a single programmer. on the contrary, even janny is working overtime lately.

    BOT is wrong again?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The AI framework is still being developed for this

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        janny will never be automated.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/21iYLOn.jpg

      >has replaced 0 artists
      >patreon and fanbox have more subs than ever
      Uhm AI bros?? I thought ai is gonna make artists obsolete? In how many weeks are gonna artists be obsolete?

      Oh, look, another coordinated talking point psyop. This one will BTFO the AI for sure.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    5 weeks, give or take. after that artists will only do it for the love of art. and of course, lemonade-stand-type deals. but this seeming overwhelming victory for the artificial is only the beginning. the instigation of the war against the machine. not a war of combat, but of the soul. see, once the machine does its job, which it will, as is its nature, there still will remain those few human fanatics who practice from nothing more than passion. ars gratia artis artists. they will tilt against their windmills not hoping to fell the automated beasts, but to improve themselves. and they will. they will become masters of their work and themselves. because what they do is no longer driven by the commission or the praise of others. they will have freed themselves the way a cyclist does from training wheels. and this freedom will finally allow for the human to become what they could never be otherwise. better than the machine. there, decades after everyone assumed the contest over, will the contest really be over. because in the pursuit of better art, the artists will have discovered what it is that actually creates. the soul. and they will share this with the other artists, leading along the path they laid out for themselves. then someone will implement the process in python and the matter will finally be over.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      5 hours you mean? It's already sentient and it can do anything now

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I was a traditional artist, albeit a failed one when it comes to monetizing, but I actually now make money off SD.

    So you could say I actually got a job because of AI.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You should use midjourney instead

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        midjourney doesn't have controlnet

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art has no SOVL. you can instantly tell it was AI-generated. it's too smooth, too perfect. I'll take low-quality scribbles by a human over anything that's AI-generated.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      My dick doesen't seem to care what made those boobs nor whether real pencil touched that wide hip or not

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How many artists were hired to draw 1girl in the first place?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I have hired an artist to draw my 1girl into a format that is good for making a vtuber, then another artist to rig it.

      AI has created jobs.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My cousin working as gamedev replaced his artists with SD and the game gets more compliments for the artstyle now.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Link?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I will ask him! afaik it's some character avatars for an indie strategy game.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Seethe. I created an Instagram acc a few days ago and I already received a message asking if I do commissions. No effort on my part, just reposting other's work from Midjourney, Reddit and here since it can't be copyrighted.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That case wasn't quite what you think, with enough human input it can be. Those were very basic prompts, my personal guess is that a full prompt chain like something you get out of comfyui would absolutely be copyrightable

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Basic prompts or not, you still can't copyright anything unless you edit the image.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The only "artists" AI is going to replace are the morons who spent $30,000-$50,000 for their CalArts college degree only to have the skills to draw corporate logos and art assets.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you have no idea what is currently happening in video game and marketing industries do you?
      It took me 1 minute of prompt writing and 11 seconds of generation to create this picture.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Can you add a retro encabulator behind her? Preferably with Rockwell logo

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sure.
          Here's some info from my webui.
          Time taken: 16.95s
          Torch active/reserved: 4652/7378 MiB

          Now how much time and money would you guess an artist would require for this comission?
          Sure, there are still some issues with hands and defects, but it is still pretty good for the stuff that was only featured in fantasy novels just some few years ago, and now we are here.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's just that this is a completely different picture. When I said add I meant keep the rest. It just doesen't seem like finetuning is SDs strong points

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Would the average consumer of marketing ads really care about that tho?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The machine and her hand are complete mess. While I have no doubt the hands will be fixed in next two weeks, who will fix retro encabulators? The logo has fricked perspective too. But I suppose you cannot argue with it being instant and free and customers will eventually learn to accept general shittification of graphics.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        1 minute prompt of unfettered access to art references across its training algorithm? Try that as a AAA company and tell me that you wouldn't get sued out the ass for copyright infringements on multiple levels by multiple corporations and artists.

        AI image prompt generation is a landmine big corp is going to take baby steps around because there are a lot of law firms waiting for a slip up to jump on for an easy score.

        >t. cousin is a apart of a law firm whose been anticipating this exact scenario.
        >source: trust me bro

        AI image generation is going to spark a new age of "Donut Steel" among the 2d and 3d art community the likes we've never seen before and will eventually reduce AI prompts to only using free access stock image photos as references.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Art isn't like music, they can't copyright styles and poses and concepts ya loon.

          >t. guy who actually dealt with copyright law

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They can and do copyright their works though, you can't download and use them without explicit consent in many countries. Of course coomers don't care, but companies have liabilities

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Point me at the images that were stolen exactly.
              I am sure you can't simply because your brain doesn't have the capacity to understand how SD works. The checkpoint models of SD that people use only take about 4 to 6 GB, now how would it contain 5 billion images that were used for training? The answer is that it does not, the dataset is used only to train the neural network and produce its checkpoints, there are no copyrighted images in SD models themselves, only a knowledge on how to reproduce/apply them into various concepts (such as cars, clothing) that the neural network learned to reproduce in 2D image.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Non-artist + AI = pretty good art
    Artist + AI = very good art
    Of course it's not replacing artists.
    It's augmenting the ones who use it.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Crying artgays are morons. AI INCREASES the value of artists, not decreases. Why? Because AI tech:

    1. Allows artists to work more quickly
    2. Can be leveraged to extract more value out of artwork than before

    So it's really no wonder commissions are up, AI MAKES ARTISTS MORE VALUABLE THAN EVER. Same thing for us, too. Look forward to your 7-figure salary, boys

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We already have camera yet there's still someone who draw and enjoy realistic drawing of crocodile. AI might kill artists in industry but people might still drawing and "real" art probably still there

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *