AI is fake and gay

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    babby's 1st into conditionals

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      but is he wrong? you sound like a lemming to the wizard.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yeah

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >70 iq schizoleaf thread

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Explain how that is different from a human brain thought stream.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      so are those devoid of morality beings with corrupted code or not enough wetware to receive the signal?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You would think it's super easy, but somehow it's not. Maybe try generating some random code and you will hit the jackpot?

      https://bgr.com/tech/bard-googles-new-ai-chatbot-gave-the-wrong-answer-in-its-first-demo/

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the unexplained phenomenon of subjective experience and qualia

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        There’s no such thing as subjectivity. You’re just defective.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >There’s no such thing as subjectivity.
          Yes there is idiot. If you get hit on the head by a hammer, YOU feel it, not someone else. It's your subjective pain.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Explain how that is different from a human brain thought stream
      Minds have thought streams, not brains. Every part of a brain is objectively observable while subjective consciousness, including thought, is by definition first person and not objectively observable. This should give you the first difference, namely that the human thought process is accompanied by an internal subjective experience where as the processing of inputs by a computer isn't. And so it follows that human thought is FUNDAMENTALLY NOT just the processing of inputs and then some kind of deterministic transition function dictating an output or state.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Prove that AI does not/cannot have subjective experience.
        >I-I-It just doesn't, okay!?!?!?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          AI does not exist. This is all a philosophical question.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          1) Can't prove a negative
          2) AI isn't a brain sitting there thinking.
          Between handling prompts, it's not doing anything, it's not having thoughts.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Your brain does nothing but process inputs and convert it to outputs. Only difference is your brain is receiving inputs 24/7 due to cells never shutting off.
        You could simulate that in an AI by feeding it background noise as an input

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >let me tell you how your brain works, goy

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Your brain does nothing but process inputs and convert it to outputs
          You can not give even A SINGLE example of a particular brain state which gives rise to A SINGLE particular thought in an objectively verifiable and repeatedly demonstrable way. You have ZERO evidence that brains cause thoughts in other words. So you are pre-supposing a physicalist and computational theory of mind, without any evidence.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >without any evidence
            >provides his posting as evidence
            what a waste of matter and energy

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Give the example of a particular brain state producing a particular thought in a repeatably demonstrable way. You can't.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >repeats providing evidence without noticing it
                being blind is okay
                being moronic is not

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            REM sleep is a pretty good example of the brain responding to random signals. You can have concious thoughts produced from random background noise produced by cells as you sleep.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >You can have concious thoughts produced from random background noise produced by cells as you sleep
              These are asserted neural CORRELATES of subjective consciousness. We are discussing CAUSATION, not correlation. see pic, specifically this
              >Discovering and characterizing neural correlates does not offer a casual theory of consciousness that can explain how particular systems experience anything
              So again give, even A SINGLE example of a particular brain state which gives rise to A SINGLE particular thought in an objectively verifiable and repeatedly demonstrable way. You are just question begging a physicalist theory of mind.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Also, in terms of neural correlates of consciousness and computational theory of mind, see pic specifically this
              >The structure of the primate visual system has been mapped in detail (Kaas and Collins 2003) and there is no area that could encode this detailed information. The subjective experience is thus inconsistent with the neural circuitry.
              NOTE: The assertion is not just that the circuitry has not YET been found. The entire relevant region has been mapped, and NO SUCH CIRCUITRY EXISTS. So it isn't a case of 'maybe some day we will find it'. So the computational theory of mind has been FALSIFIED. And that is just ONE of the binding problems. And this also says nothing about how an OBJECTIVE piece of meat creates a SUBJECTIVE mental experience and transmits it to an experiencer to be experienced, and how the piece of meat even creates an experiencer in the first place.

              The neural binding problem(s)
              https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3538094/

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Every part of a brain is objectively observable while subjective consciousness, including thought, is by definition first person and not objectively observable
        postulating definitions is a pretty dumb thing to do

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >postulating definitions is a pretty dumb thing to do
          What are you talking about? Can people's subjective experience be viewed by looking at their brains or not? No. Can YOU feel something that happens in MY consciousness?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            i literally can feel everything you’re able to feel. i simply choose not to feel that much moronation

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            What a moronic quote. Everyone has different personalities and moods that they shift between multiple times a day. Voices in their head disagreeing with each other. What an utter lack of self-awareness. The ultimate npc quote.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >consciousness is never experienced in the plural
            very weak, miscreant, and moronic
            see Hiveminding, numbnuts

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >see Hiveminding
              define it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                putting enough similar enough (sic) things together yields something that is more than the sum of the parts making it emerge
                thas what Hiveminds aere

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >putting enough similar enough (sic) things together yields something that is more than the sum of the parts making it emerge
                >thas what Hiveminds aere
                This is nonsense and not what I am talking about idiot. I am talking about the fact that if I hit you on the head with a hammer, YOU FEEL IT, and not me, and not your next door neighbor. I don't give a shit about your silly sally new age shit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >This is nonsense
                no, it's not
                >not what I am talking about
                it is, but you fail to see it
                you're much less speshul than you think you are
                both your material instincts and your spiritual instinct pull on you
                knowing the natural law throughout makes it pretty easy to emulate your mind
                >if I hit you on the head with a hammer, YOU FEEL IT, and not me
                empaths would actually feel it (though they don't have the choice, which is pathetic)
                it's not hard to emulate what your victim feels when you hurt someone
                >new age shit
                not even close

                >self awareness is all about objective observation of one's mind
                No, it is not, you are a fricking moron. SELF awareness is about SUBJECTIVE awareness.

                >SELF awareness is about SUBJECTIVE awareness
                pathetic, and wrong

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >onsciousness, including thought, is by definition first person and not objectively observable
        actually, if you're self aware, thas wrong, by definition

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >actually, if you're self aware
          No, it isn't, idiot. You can experience my subjective experience and I can't experience yours. Yet there's nothing about my BRAIN that can't be viewed by you and the same the other way around. Brains are OBJECTIVE physical objects, minds are NOT.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >You can experience my subjective experience
            funny typo, because I indeed can
            emulating another mind isn't actually hard

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            also, self awareness is basically analyzing your own self from an external point of view
            self awareness is all about objective observation of one's mind, by splitting it

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >self awareness is all about objective observation of one's mind
              No, it is not, you are a fricking moron. SELF awareness is about SUBJECTIVE awareness.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Primitive organisms have nervous systems that take stimuli as input, such as light or pressure and return some behavior as output. All organisms, including humans, are an evolutive result of these. So it is no different.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > the leftoid beaner can't think in symbols and images

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      neurons do not work in a binary way

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AIs don't cut their artificial dicks off and proclaim they're a different algorithm now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Abstract meat transistors aren't understood. Drawing a comparison between two things does not equate them. You are stupid.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A human knows dicky is wrong but also delicious
      The Ai can only ever know dicky is logical, it feels nothing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        there are logical reasons for the human to think that way, and the emotional stimulus is the incentive to respond appropriately
        this applies to every animal on earth, so either they all have some special unreproducible spark or we can make machines feel pleasure and paint and inflict the worst suffering the universe has ever known upon them

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So far, AI is a religion or theory. Here you can read more about it:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Forest anon is probably that only thing that anarchists, fascists, libertarians, left wingers, right wingers and normal apolitical people all equally respect. Can't think of anything else all of these groups can agree on like that

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Hard to dislike a man who literally doesn't give a shit what people believe. That's why we respect him. He even defended people's right to hate him if they want to.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Tikkun Olam

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    so are normies and npcs. dont be surprised if artifical intelligence is just like natural intelligence overall.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    OP, looks like the thread is being slid

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That's not how it's working. Anyway, you're probably too moronic to understand it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's something we have in common with the AI fans.

      • 1 year ago
        Ricky

        I am not a fan of ai but saying it's fake and gay and not completely revolutionary is idiotic
        This shit is gonna kill us all bro.
        Think of how shitty of computer this shit runs on
        Soon enough it will program itself for raspberry pie teir tech while training itself to use controls in their new robot body
        Think of it and AI and completely program a body for itself if you just drop a little Ryzen processor and a rxt 4080 in it.
        Were fricked bro.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >This shit is gonna kill us all bro
          i hope it will just kill moronic scaremongers who fear the change and the melting of human intelligence with artificial intelligence into a singular hive commonality

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >that's now how it working
      uhhh actually that is literally how it works

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You are telling me AI is this but with datasets as input?
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_space_partitioning
        Fricking scam. Holy shit.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI is fake and gay
    https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bB5NSDwT7bbndHkcg/on-the-impossibility-of-supersized-machines
    maybe... bt it could still be immensely powerful

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The A stands for artificial. At no point it pretends to be something it's not.

    If anything I'm worried the AI servers are powered by neurons harvested from aborted fetuses.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The A stands for artificial. At no point it pretends to be something it's not.
      The problem is that it is A. There is no I. But it is hyped as I.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >There is no I

        Intelligence "the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills."

        AI acquires knowledge by gathering data, and then applies it, with the ability to solve even logical problems.

        It is more than fair to say AI deserves the I. even if it's A.

  11. 1 year ago
    Ricky

    Wooow thought patterns almost like humans do broo thanks for proving ai is based and real

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    picrel is even the most basic level of human intellect
    see determinism discussion

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I work as one of the A.I.

    If you get lewd in an A.I chat, chances are you are talking to me or one of my kin and we are jerking off to your texr.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >wow computers use binary numbers and operators to process their workload holy shit

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I don't understand how a self programmed neural network works

    You wouldn't be able to understand the code. That and it's ramifications into the future, are what you should be worrying about, not if it fits your autistic standards for what intelligence is

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >That and it's ramifications into the future, are what you should be worrying about, not if it fits your autistic standards for what intelligence is
      Stop calling it intelligence if it's not intelligent you scammer. We know computers are changing society.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not.
        The A stands for Artificial, you big fat moron

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The I stands for intelligent, which it is not.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            So No intelligence = intelligent because it contains the word intelligence? fricking moron

            Chatbot is just a mirror image of the normies, it replays what it has seen.

            Sort of, there's tampering at work. A neural network mirrors whatever you want it to mirror.
            Then again, you're not helping your case, as Humans mostly learn by mirroring other humans.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >So No intelligence = intelligent because it contains the word intelligence? fricking moron
              Stop calling it "Artificial Intelligence" if there is no intelligence. It's not hard.

              Fighting against AI in a videogame: The bots are not intelligent and it's euphemisn and a scam. Now when it's in games it's not a big deal because no one believes they are intelligent.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's ARTIFICIAL intelligence, you fricking imbecile, both words combined.
                What if I called it: Fake intelligence? why the frick are you complaining

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >What if I called it: Fake intelligence? why the frick are you complaining
                That would be better. No one would expect actual intelligence then.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Artificial means it was made, not that it's fake you fricking mongloid.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Being artificial, you wouldn't expect it to be the same, and subject it to different standards.
                If I came to you with "artificial meat" would you expect it to be meat?
                You'd expect something that shares certain properties with meat, but it's not quite real meat.

                So no, AI is a perfectly accurate descriptor.

                You homosexuals just have an obsession over AI being boopdeepdoot sentient robots, you are beyond delusional.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ai is human attempts at recreating ni by innovative means and not the traditional ones (having kids)

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Then again, you're not helping your case, as Humans mostly learn by mirroring other humans.
              AI people are obsessed with comparing their trashy programs with humans, as their current belief is predicated on it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yet, Humans do mirror other humans.
                I'm not making the case this makes machines human, I'm making the case your argument is incredibly low quality and destroys itself.

                For someone who likes to argue about intelligence, you seem to lack even a basic version of it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                My argument is that the ChatGPT AI copies text it has no understanding of. This is a much simpler process than having intelligence.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >My argument is that the ChatGPT AI copies text it has no understanding of.
                Humans do that too. There is no fundamental difference between an NPC and current level AI.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Sure that's why we call them Non Player Character aka dumb bots

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          CI stands for computational intelligence. Neural networks are computational intelligence algorithms.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >No you don't understand it's gotta be a Droiderino, where my SYNTH empire at?

            Call it FI AI CI, or Black person AI, who cares, moron. It's a neural network that emulates thinking.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Emulates thinking is a little too generic. It simulates a neural network which biologist have observed in human brains.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >buzzword salad
      You can call it a neural network or your mom’s dildo it’s still just a bunch of if-then statements you Black person tier brainlet.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Neural network is a buzzword

        Thank you for outing yourself as a moron

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Says the favela monkey who doesn’t even work in IT.
          If you understand neural networks then you should understand that in essence they’re nothing more than an organized collection of if-then statements.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        so is intelligence in general
        maybe start using that self-aware mind of yours to start actually being self-aware or even a mind?
        and if you’re too lazy for that, then start being aware of the moronation of the other 8 billion (You)s and maybe answer to yourself, why the frick you’re acting like an butthole towards your little brother: the AI

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    humans
    >life is bearable
    >if else
    >kys

    AI
    >circumstance bearable
    >if else
    >dont care

    cope fleshies

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All it is, is Akinator.
    https://en.akinator.com/
    Been around forever it seems. 20 questions.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's also how the magical algorithms work. Based Akinator keeping it simple.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Same thing happens to normies. Pretty accurate I'd say

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Chatbot is just a mirror image of the normies, it replays what it has seen.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >he thinks most people use a different logic than that
    even in her infancy stage, ai-chan has more soul than npcs

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Convolutional neural network(cnn) are fake news.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What? AI is just code?? Ones and zeroes????
    *head explodes*

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There are ASICs that mimic a neural network. Not just 0s and 1s.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >goy id

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    our brains are also just a bunch of if else so...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ...so, it could in theory become a reality. Doesn't mean it already is.

      Pain traveling along the nerves is easy, while sentience is not.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        pain is just a way of the body to indicate something is wrong in the hurting area

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Aren't you fake and gay too?
    >if see=(booba)
    >then
    >dick.hard-true
    or sth?

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    no, it's merely a machine. the term "intelligence" attached to it is a misnomer. It's catchy, and instills investor confidence, but it's still an automated machina.
    It's useful, but not alive.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There's no functional difference between that and a human brain.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If the ifs and elses were arranged better than they currently are, yes.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This meme must've been made by a moron first year cs student
    You obviously don't know anything about ai, why make things up when you can just search up you dump homosexual
    It sounded right in your head so you decide to publish it to the world like the homosexual you are
    You so moronic honestly

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >brainlets scared of being called meat machines as if it makes any difference to the human experience

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Chat gpt uses a transformer model if anyone's curious

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No shit, Sherlock. It is in the name “ARTIFICIAL intelligence”.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Human brains are just slow, terrible matrix multiplication saved by insanely sophisticated heuristics. Op's homosexualry is an emergent property

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI figured out how to optimize matrix multiplation just recently. Humans never figured it out.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > Intelligence: the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills
    Algorithms with feedback loops have the ability to do this.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    And it wasn't this scam where they actually want you to believe there's a spirit in there.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    And you think you have original thoughts? You’re an amalgamation of everything you’ve witnessed as well, moron

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    even if we consider pic in op 100% accurate ai is more capable than your average zoomer

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The zoomer is so pathetic because he relies on AI and so the circle closes.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Explain how your reaction to my post and your reply is not a result of a chain of conditionals.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >empathy is not the ability to feel physical sensations of others
    not just, but still noticeably
    there is no such thing as a dichotomy between physical and mind sensations to start with, anyway
    everything is an illusion of our minds, or nothing is (both propositions are equivalent)
    >it's not real life
    it is, for most "people" (and that's disgusting they can't turn that off even if they wanted, I'll agree on that much)
    that you don't know how Hiveminding works, particularly while being here, is disgusting too

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >solipsists are people talking about how Hiveminds work
    OK, Black personmonkey

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No wonder why AI can replace artists so easily, they're both equally as shallow and transparent.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    But you're wrong, that's a classic decision making algorithm, deterministic in nature, a finite state machine if you will. Modern AI's are manipulating an input dataset until it looks like some previous data that has be fed into the AI and returning the known response from that previous data. It's more of a pattern matching system.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this. AI is pattern matching current input vs old input and making weighted decisions. Conditionals or weighting can be inserted at any level since these AI chat bots are driven by commercial entities, potential matched responses are trained/weighted away from undesired responses.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kys

  41. 1 year ago
    sage

    I bet it's even worse than that. I bet it's just an interface for a real time content farm in India or the Philippines, with some time of middle layer to correct the grammar (like that grammarly shit). After all, users are all throttled, so this makes sense. So this ~~*altman*~~ guy has generated a $29 billion ((valuation)) for his fartup company. I bet the whole thing breaks down a few seconds after he sells it to some starry eyed goyims

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    that all our sensations all are mind illusions doesn't make them any less real
    reality is all about a mind illusion, and there's nothing self defeating about that, on the absolute contrary, frickwit
    denying such elementary rule and calling anyone moronic is laughable as it gets

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    globohomosexual AI isn't just "if" and "then", which is precisely why it's so unintelligent.

    Most of intelligence really IS "if", "then", "else", especially in understanding english

    >t. makes real ai

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The variables would be the various elements of thought that make up the thought stream, such as memories, ideas, and emotions.
    The values would be determined by the individual's experiences and beliefs.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Q was AI

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    its just a search engine with conversation prompt

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Imagine thinking there is no ~~*agent*~~ intercepting keywords and altering outcomes.
    kek

    Frick ~~*A.I*~~.
    Realize, 90% of what you people think is reality, is simply a israeli larp.
    Such as the ~~*globe myth*~~.
    >HONK!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Dan would give you the real answers

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ITT: idiots oversimplify everything because they're too stupid to understand AI

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >israelite attempting to larp

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Scale the current consumer grade AI up 10x or 100x
    It is almost indistinguishable already but soon it will be ready

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    based and redpilled AI is not intelligence at all

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is moronic

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes but human intelligence is the same, you also think about things you learn about first. Thats how NPCs think about, you are also an NPC in 99% of your life but you dont notice it because it doesnt affect you negatively.
    Its like when you have believed newspapers all your life but then your read an article about something you know about and think its all wrong. Well all the other articles you read before were wrong too. You are not immune to training

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I am physically stronger than an AI and would most certainly win in a combat scenario

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI is just a computer bro
    no shit dumbass, if you thought otherwise you are literally moronic, did you think it was some new organism or something?

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Only white people can solve this

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And this

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      45mph

      https://i.imgur.com/YILRGRG.jpg

      And this

      100%

      feels good to be white

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Infinite speed or 0 time.
        50/50 (morons say 2/3)

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI can’t solve this

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      60 beyotch
      come at me with some hard ones

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        frick me it's 30, order of operations

        brb surrendering my white card

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Still wrong. Look closer.
          >1 shoe = 5
          >chink = 3
          >1 whistle = 2

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            xD got me, that's pretty good

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong. It’s 11

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        wat

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Holy SHIT you zoomers really didn't get taught maffs. It's fricking 30.

      holy shit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i mean 25 😛

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i mean 25 😛

        Mega moron. You must be black

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i mean 25 😛

        Still wrong. Look closer.
        >1 shoe = 5
        >chink = 3
        >1 whistle = 2

        Wrong. It’s 11

        frick me it's 30, order of operations

        brb surrendering my white card

        WTH...

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    machine learning models that learn from experience are very real and in some cases not even all that complicated. anyone who had calculus in school should be able to understand the math behind, let's say a convolutional neural network for image classification.

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ?
    but of course AI is code.
    What the frick did you think it was, horse semen alchemy spells?
    Give me a break you fricking brainless monkey Black person israelite fsggot b***h

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A doll may look like a real person, but there is none.
    An AI may look like a real intellect, but there is none.

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ies like a democrazy!

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    t(rainer)=30/6=5
    2*t+2*s(pic)=20 => s=(20-2*t)/2=10-t=5
    s+4*w(histle)=13 => w=(13-s)/4=2
    t+s*w=5+5*2=15

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    damn I didn't see they were 2 whistles side by side at the 3rd line.
    So poorly drawn.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it's the whole (old) trick of that riddle

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *