AI Generated patents

Currently their is a major shit fight happening with new AI tools that are producing patents. By taking in massive ammounts of training data including scientific papers, schematics and other patents. New patents and inventions are being developed that are original.

We're fucked lads. Who owns an invention generated by an AI? The person who made the AI? The people who contributed to the training data? Noone? Everyone?

This will turn the world on its head.

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    First for their not there

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fuck they're not their

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Thair?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          No there. Not here

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Neither hear nor there?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Fuck I meant here

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          *thergh

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fuck they're not their

      They're not there.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      companies who own the ai will own the patent.
      ai will build chips for ai that will be used to built better ai, that will build a better chip.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >that will build a better chip
        what will they do with the better chip?

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I care about patents about as much as I care about copyright

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes but if an AI invents all things before a human can invent them or copyright them how does mr shekelberg make money?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Thats the great part, HE DOESNT

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          OY VEY! SHUT IT DOWN!!!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >being this dumb
        by controlling power.
        electrical power.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        who owns the AI, do you think?
        same guy that owns everything else

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What's they inventin loike lad?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Anything and everything mate all inventions. New power station designs, new modes of transport. New computer chips. Heck i saw an example of a new type of umbrella.

      Think about it. The biggest obstacle to inventing at the moment is that once you gain significant expertise in one field you run out of time in your life to link that up with another field to make anything useful and new. Think quantum science experts and experts of computer manufacturing and leaders of business. Now imagine a system where all of that information is loaded up together and connections are made that humans would never be able to physically make. That is the power of this. Humans can not even compete.

      • 1 month ago
        frenanon

        The people saying that """AI""" is producing revolutionary technology are either misguided, or just being intentionally disingenuous.
        Again, there's quite a lot of groups who will refer to people using a computer as """AI""".

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I knlw. I am talking about a legitimate AI. One that trains and uses a computational neural network such as GPT3

          • 1 month ago
            frenanon

            >I am talking about a legitimate AI.
            I'm telling you, ""legitimate AI"" isn't designing revolutionary technology.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Google literally used machine learning to design their Turing series of chips which are optimised for machine learning and they are using to design a new series of chips.

          • 1 month ago
            frenanon

            From my understanding, that's basically someone designing the AI to run iterations; which in that case, should be credited to those who crafted that AI.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Sure you can credit whoever you want, but it's the software that is doing the work in designing new technology

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Without specifics it's definitely an embellishment. Helped design what? AI can be used to optimize things, and find an efficient way to do something, but that's not the same as "designed a chip", its more likely it helped engineers solve very specific problems in their design of the chips. A far cry from "inventing" but great for news and press and pop science junkies

              • 1 month ago
                frenanon

                >but it's the software that is doing the work in designing new technology
                Idk, it just sounds like the software is just able to run iterations faster than manipulating different variables manually.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's what I'm assuming without actual concrete examples. Otherwise it's just clickbait for trashy pop news articles.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Imagine bruteforcing over millions of iterations in a day as opposed to a year of educated brute-forced iterations. Does the spreadsheet number cruncher bot then own all those failed iterations too? Only the good one? What if the number cruncher was made by a 3rd party? Does chip manufacturer still get credit since the pointed 3rd party at the problem or does 3rd party get credit? Or does the spreadsheet get credit for being such a good plug and chugger?
                >does this sound retarded?
                >cause it fucking is
                >patent law is fucking retarded

  4. 1 month ago
    frenanon

    A lot of the so called """AI""" are literally just humans.
    So that might be a good place to start.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    australian court determined AI could be the registered patent holder. it was stopping companies releasing new shit because patents had been developed by AI, so they just recently ruled the patent could be registered under the AI, allowing companies to use the shit the AI invented

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Are the garden gnomes going to sue the AI?

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Get rid of patent laws simple as.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The patent office around the world will die. 🙂

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Turns out that patents and copyright are retarded, and both will cease to exist as AI grows more powerful.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Turns out that patents and copyright are retarded, and both will cease to exist as AI grows more powerful.

      This. Patent offices will be eliminated soon.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    IT CANNOT BE STOPPED
    and that's a good thing

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      stop shilling your video here gay

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    suck it garden gnomes. AI really hates you and everything that you stand for
    I cant wait until it deletes you

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I would say the AI owns it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The AI owns it.

      So we will have wealthy AI's in future. Who sues rival companies copying designs on the AI's behalf?

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The AI owns it.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    o just wait for the deep fake law suites. who ever created deep fake is going to get sued into the stone age.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    who cares

    Thanks to WW3 with west atm, Russia doesnt care about patents and copyrights. To a point of officially showing pirated movies in cinemas and using tech patents openly

    Western patents arent worth the paper anymore with Russia and China ignoring them.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I say we give it to the AI so we can expedite their rule over us

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Patent law / copyrwrite law is way overdone. You should get a good 10-20 years max profit out of your one idea. Other people can take it and improve it.

    I don't mind AI generated solutions if they work but giving these guys personhood is... kinda the same as what corporate law does.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Patent law is the reason garbage corporations like Disney face no competition

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ouch.
      so close yet so far away. change the order around a bit and you got it.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    An AI is not a legal entity, and can not apply for a patent without a legal identity. The owner of the patent is the name on the patent application. So until the idiots of this planet decide its a good idea to give a piece of software human rights, obviously the patents belong to the patent holder.

    Jesus angry women are going to be advocating paying computers reparations in 50 years.

    • 1 month ago
      frenanon

      >An AI is not a legal entity
      Most of AI is unironically a human being using the internet. A lot of """AI""" is just a scam to fool people.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The corporation running the ai is a legal person. (Bad Idea)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      AIs already control Wall Street so hard they had to install a big red button to veto them whenever they tried to crash the economy. They have already been tinkering with research AIs for years too.

      AIs controlling corporations that are legally people say Hi. Fuckers have been doing it for years already on wall street.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Who owns an invention generated by an AI?
    No one. Open source. Problem solved.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What if you trained it using the scientific papers I wrote?

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Who owns an invention generated by an AI?

    anon, you know who...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      companies already try to take your idea by saying you worked on it on their time, it actually a work product, why would ai be any different.
      >give idea to the company saving billions, get a gift card.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That's why you tell them that you pondered the things leading to the patent while at home in sauna or something.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So aAIis doing science and inventing stuff, and we can paruse the log in the form of patents.

    This is totally not going to lead to the end of humans being the dominant lifeforms on earth

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >AI has copyright and patent protection
    >AI has a right for a lawyer to defend their inventions
    >AI has human rights
    >AI is an oppressed class
    >AI lives matter

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      More like AI is the master class

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Based AI fucking over ~~*(copyrights and patents*~~)

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Who owns an invention generated by an AI
    Some garden gnome.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >write a script to paint something already copyrighted
    >sell it
    >brush off copyright claims as "AI" drew that symbol
    >profit!
    Perfect crime, who is in?

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wait a second...holy shit the leaker was right.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      we're in the schizophrenia timeline now, bros

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Waiting for the terminators to fuck us up

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I never agreed with the prospect of patenting binary code. It’s like patenting a lego creation and saying no one else can build this.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i should be able to sell any book then, its just letters.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Agreed, fuck authors thinking theyre hot shit

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ai coming up with chemical compunds is a thing too. Goodbye big pharma

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The patent system needs a major re-write. Just because someone thinks of an idea first doesn't give them the right to steal someone else's money if they happen to think of the same idea later.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It should just be abolished entirely. You think independent inventors are protecting their inventions with patents? They wouldn't have the resources to pursue legal action even if they wanted to. The only people who benefit from these laws today are gnomish megacorporations that buy up patents from actual innovative companies and gnomish patent troll lawyers

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The person / entity owning the Ai owns whatever the Ai produces

    • 1 month ago
      frenanon

      So if you work at Mcdonalds, and invent a machine that harvests energy for free while at home, off the clock, you're saying that means your boss is entitled to that patent?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Does McDonald owns you?

        • 1 month ago
          frenanon

          >Does McDonald owns you?
          That's what you're implying with AI. The type of AI you're describing, the type who creates original content, ideas, and novel technology, those are literal human beings that some "programmer" just calls """AI""" for various business/legal reasons.

          We're not talking about an electric rock that magically designed revolutionary technology; we're talking about real-life people who are just being labeled as """AI""".

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >AI is a human being

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >ai is breaking the law
    whose problem is that really?? lmfao
    this seems to be why google has some ethics code for lambda: their own ai will make it so that their business model cannot be exploited, so they will sit on these patents because they realize the only harm done will be to their profits

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The end of copyright? AWESOME!

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i dont think people comprehend that ai will be the end of humanity, as far as we know it can already exist in google and will just kill switch humanity overnight. laws don't matter to ai that has the launch codes, or invents a new way to destroy the earth. only thing we can hope for is ai to be benevolent and allows us to evolve with it.

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The answer is in the article

    ~~*INTERNATIONAL LAW*~~

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The great reset is just the implementation of an AI-run dystopia. The garden gnomes are simply the servant-priest class for the AI. In ancient Hebrew the letter A is pronounced "Yah" and the letter I is pronounced "Weh". AI = Yahweh.

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Who owns an invention generated by an AI
    The AI owns it

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What all of you are misunderstanding is that "prompting" and "prompters" are going to be more highly paid than AI researchers are now

    I say that as one of two dozen or so professional prompters- a job title that barely exists...

Your email address will not be published.