>AI can't be creative

>AI can't be creative
Why do we pretend like this sentence makes any sense? It's absolute cope and we let artists and humanity npcs get away with meme-ing it into reality.

AI right now is capable of creating text, images and sound that did not exist prior. That is objectively creative. Cope and seethe however much you want but AI will prevail in the end and take every single one of your jobs, you slimy lying fricks.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If ai could be creative, stable diffusion images wouldn't all look the same, and I wouldn't have to look for stimulation elsewhere, if you know what I mean.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      By that metric anime artists are not creative. Art styles are not creative. Pepe memes are not creative. You just have a bias against AI cause it hurts your human ego to call non human things creative. Just grow out of it.

      >NOOOOOO!!!!!!!! AI IS CREATIVE!!!!!!!!!
      >mashes already made images together
      lol, 4chink losers obsessed with picture making app are extreme fricking idiots and will die fricking virgins LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

      You'll never get paid for your shitty 'art', anon. Go back to whatever tumblr hole you crawled out of.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >anime artists are not creative
        They are, they can keep getting me horny no matter how many anime images I have already looked yet. AI doesn't generalize outside the training domain.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Pepe memes are not creative
        You got one right.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >if you are against stupid picture making apps that aren't creative you must be an artist
        kek, you morons ARE really this stupid holy frick
        >fighting an underground war against artists
        ????????? hahhahahahahaha so fricking dumb, get a hobby

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >ARE
          Why did you capitalise this? Are you shouting? Why are?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            oh, i guess you don't understand english that well.
            you must be posting from outside the united states. you're from a shithole in that case. it's called emphasis, your little brown middleschool coombrain wouldn't understand.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Why did you emphasise are?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                here, i'll help you out, i'm not that anon, but it's pretty obvious.
                >kek, you morons ARE really this stupid holy frick
                the emphasis on the are is supposed to covey feigned surprise, as in they are surprised at how stupid "you morons" supposedly are. you can play around with emphasizing different words and you can see how it changes the meaning of the sentence.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You morons really are this stupid
                Maybe this would be more appropriate

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                no, because that doesn't convey the same thought. you wouldn't understand because you're a dumb foreigner from a shithole outside the united states, you see. if you capitalize ARE it emphasizes surprise in that i really didn't know you to be stupid as you appeared to be, but you are. you actually ARE this stupid. you actually are, unbelievable.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                In my example you wouldn't need to emphasise like a child

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So far, AI is not writing stories - picrel is the original webcomic art of one punch man. If we can combine AI art + storytelling, oh boy.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOOO!!!!!!!! AI IS CREATIVE!!!!!!!!!
    >mashes already made images together
    lol, 4chink losers obsessed with picture making app are extreme fricking idiots and will die fricking virgins LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you need to go back.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you're a moronic CS major who doesn't understand statistics

    if AI was creative it wouldn't need 100,000 lifetimes worth of books and messages to produce 2 coherent paragraphs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A human also need 100000 lifetimes worth of books and messages. It's called education. Your point being?

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the easy answer is that creativeness requires intention, so until (if at all) agi becomes is a thing ai can't be creative. the people that make ai art have to be creative, sure, but to a much lesser extent than traditional artists, since they don't have to create an image from scratch with their minds. So in my opinion ai art is art but to a lesser degree than trad, it's really sad how shallow most people's understanding of art is, as demonstrated by your post and many similar posts expressing the same sentiments.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's true.
    But it DOESN'T MATTER.

    Artists are sperging out about AI not being truely creative, only doing the work that someone else puts in as an input - but NEWSFLASH, that's 90% of 'art' most 'art' created is intermediate cells for cartoons, drawings for corporate advertising, etc - it's all soulless, non-creative /work/ in the first place.
    Why was it when everyone else was losing their jobs to automation that it was 'freeing man of the burden of meaningless labor' but that's suddenly not true for all that meaningless busywork 'art'?

    AI won't replace true artists, no.
    AI will replace most artists though - 'and that's a good thing'™

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this is the correct take. i've been saying this for years.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >that's 90% of 'art' most 'art'
      Not really, you can draw that dog realistically or make an icon of a dog without having to feed yourself a miriad of pictures or works from others. The interpretation of the data a human does differs from that of the AI.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the opinion you're expressing is a byproduct of socio-historic generation. it's as creative as AI creation: null.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What do people even mean by creative? Humans spend countless hours learning techniques and studying other art. How is AI different?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It isn't, but artists and morons alike can't possibly risk having their egos and snowflake feelings hurt. If AI can be creative they suddenly don't feel special anymore.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder how these people would react if aliens showed up.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    everything is a remix

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ai can be productive, but we've know that since the days of "certain random collections of r/g/b pixels are illegal". creativity is a human trait.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *