AI cannot exist without plagiarizing humans.

AI cannot exist without plagiarizing humans.

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    good artists copy, great ones steal

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Humans cannot exist without plagiarizing humans.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      this.
      I hate that my threads get 0 replies but shit like this hits 300 posts

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >my threads get 0 replies
        This is the time to apply natural intelligence and forget about artificial stupidity. This board is full of vacuous posts and threads, make at least sure reading the OP text is worthwhile. If people leave thinking I want my 2 minutes back, you have failed badly, and AI will take your job.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why would you want to get replies from these dipshits?

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          sometimes I just need help and mlp wont answer

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            just use stupid questions thread or something

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Post a thread right now anon and I'll give it (You)'s for you

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sounds like a (You) problem.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Have AI create threads for you that will generate replies. Problem solve.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      thread already over, anything under this is just "WELL UHM IT'S A ROBOT NOT A HUMAN"

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      that's why we are still drawing stick figures on cave walls

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        I do

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >plagiarizing
    Well, I asked an AI for some literal plagiarism. How'd it do? What direct copies that can't be explained by mere coincidence do you see? Show receipts.

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    you can't build a car without plagiarising the person who invented the wheel

    you goddamn thief

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mother of cope!

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    /thread

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >non-fucky fingers
      How? I've seen these with paid implementations but not free ones. What's the difference? Longer run-time?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        i can only speak for SD but for the most part hands and feet work fine now, i rarely re-roll for hands

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Neat. One day I'll try and figure out how to run these on my own machine. Or maybe by then someone will have written a program that does it all for me.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          "fine"
          lol
          this is the issue with all this bullshit generation
          idiots eat it up
          it's "fine"
          jesus
          fucking retards

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >monochrome
          Why?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/A6GRPzK.jpg

      i can only speak for SD but for the most part hands and feet work fine now, i rarely re-roll for hands

      Artoddlers BTFO

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      controlnet plugin in SD allows for importing poses of humans, including 5 fingers per hand, and drawing around them

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    All ideas by humans are build upon ideas other humans had before them. AI isn't doing anything the humans aren't doing.

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    The joke is that the AI is too stupid to make her the right color

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Heh, I like that interpretation.

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Neither can FOSS, yet BOT defends that too.
    Protip: useless people will always steal from the productive, then try to justify it.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >''''''steal''''''
      Post nose.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Actually quite fat and squat, as I'm black.
        But I'm a productive black, unlike you.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >REEEEEEEEEEEEEing about ~~*IP*~~
          >productive
          lol
          lmao even

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know how anyone can justify the mental gymnastics to refute that statement.
    If you go beyond 2/3rds waifu portraits, it becomes painfully obvious, that the AIs shallow dataset just recombines existing pictures in an obvious and pathetic way.
    I just randomly searched for a 'mars rover' picture, and this is what I got in image search. Top is artist created, bottom is obviously SD. Not only it is clearly plagiarized (to the point the search algo tagged it as 'similar') but its also irredeemably shit. One would need to fill the AI with millions of mars rover images (drawn by actual humans) to get something decent.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Img2img & inpainting bait

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Complete bullshit.

        Bullshit in what way?
        I just found this on a link:
        https://wallhaven.cc/index.php/w/jxeop5

        I have no association with the creator and I have no idea how it was created.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          im not who you replied to but:
          if the images are so bad then there's nothing to complain, also you're taking one example and disregarding the other ones, even if it takes you 100 attempts, it's far better than paying an artist to plagiarize other humans

          i hope you judge artists who fail the same way you judge neural net works lol

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Complete bullshit.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Generate an image using an existing art piece as a guide
      >Complains that the generated image looks like the original
      Just how retarded can you archuds get?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      AI art is overblown and will quickly devolve into almost entirely nonsense unless you get some kind of strictly curated datasets to draw from.

      even still at best it's going to mean a lot less talented people are going to be needed and a lot more extremely mediocre people of rank and connections will be able to take their place.

      essentially imagine everything disney does to worlds/franchises but for everything;
      In essence the contemporary combination of "Focus Grouping", "market research", and drive for market expansion result in what amounts to an AI anyway as far as "big popular culture" is concerned.

      anything abberent will not see the light of day, anything even slightly "revolutionary" will be crushed..

      AI will be used to identify subversives and their possible networks, in order that countermeasures might be more easily utilized.

      AI will be used to suppress dissent by highlighting stories likely to derail or deflect any possible popular movement from gaining enough reach to actually matter.

      >In Essence we're going to be ruled by a neoliberal police state that will use the dumbest possible issues to divide people and prevent it's legitimacy from being challenged.

      The rest of the algorithm will ensure that there is enough self interest in simply NOT challenging anything that the system persists until some other disaster manmade or otherwise sweeps away the hollowed out shell.

      AI truthers are going to be a bigger schizo problem than space truthers.

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is overblown and will quickly devolve into almost entirely nonsense unless you get some kind of strictly curated datasets to draw from.

    even still at best it's going to mean a lot less talented people are going to be needed and a lot more extremely mediocre people of rank and connections will be able to take their place.

    essentially imagine everything disney does to worlds/franchises but for everything;
    In essence the contemporary combination of "Focus Grouping", "market research", and drive for market expansion result in what amounts to an AI anyway as far as "big popular culture" is concerned.

    anything abberent will not see the light of day, anything even slightly "revolutionary" will be crushed..

    AI will be used to identify subversives and their possible networks, in order that countermeasures might be more easily utilized.

    AI will be used to suppress dissent by highlighting stories likely to derail or deflect any possible popular movement from gaining enough reach to actually matter.

    >In Essence we're going to be ruled by a neoliberal police state that will use the dumbest possible issues to divide people and prevent it's legitimacy from being challenged.

    The rest of the algorithm will ensure that there is enough self interest in simply NOT challenging anything that the system persists until some other disaster manmade or otherwise sweeps away the hollowed out shell.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *