AI Audiobooks - Publishers seething

Really Apple? All this AI shit going around and the only thing Apple can think to use it on is reading a few books?

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI use completely useful for most shit.

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    what else would they do? text and image generation is a gimmick that doesnt give them anything. upgrading Siri is absolutely something that benefits apple

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI move expected to cause backlash
    Apple computers could read text since the 80s ffs. No one cares. Articles like this are a desperate effort to make AI sound like a far more disruptive technology than it is.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe listen to the examples. They don’t sound like fucking Microsoft Sam, you retard. They actually have intonation now

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        cool

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        intonation! what a revolution! AI will grow world GDP 100%/year!

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          If you can’t see how automating more and more unique features of people can impact a market,
          I can’t help you. You’re hopeless. Read McLuhan

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            AI is useful. I just don't see it as a huge revolution that some are expecting.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous
              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >implying he's wrong

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Read up on protein synthesis. Sermons CEO is now confounding Isomorphic Labs. Tons of startups in this space. That will actually be a game changer.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Deepmind CEO Demis Hassabis**

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's a useful use case. not a revolution.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        The read aloud feature in Microsoft Edge has some pretty good voices to pick from now.

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    People that think listening to an audiobook is the same as actually reading it are absolute retards. I only ever listened to Catching the Big Fish because it was narrated by Lynch himself. Learn about channels of thought

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Absolutely, but you can listen to an audiobook while you drive or do chores around the house.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Audio books are really great for that. I also listen to one while trying to sleep. I'm listening to radio shows, though. There's a million of them on archive.org. Most of them aren't properly labeled, but can be found by searching through the full radio archives. They have full bbc radio 4 for decades back, so it's just a matter of looking at past schedules and downloading the right hourly stream.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hey wordcel, you realize that 99.9% of human history was oral, right? Think of it this way: your whore mother.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >People that think listening to an audiobook is the same as actually reading it are absolute retards
        You're right, it's not the same at all. Humans evolved telling stories around campfires for hundreds of thousands of years. Written language has only existed for 5,000-10,000 years, and the proliferation of books began less than 500 years ago. The spoken word is the proper way for stories to be told, books are purely archival media.

        not that moron, but oral transmitted stories are very rudimentary compared with actual literary prose, audiobooks are a fucking chore also.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          >actual literary prose
          >shakespeare was meant to be read in your IG-cottagecore lifestyle-pod with a cup of tea
          lmao fuck off retard

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Only because you're a brainlet with limited comprehension that has to reread passages in order to understand them. If you were alive in a pre-writing society, you would have learned by now how to listen properly and be able to both recite and summarize a passage after hearing it once.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >People that think listening to an audiobook is the same as actually reading it are absolute retards
      You're right, it's not the same at all. Humans evolved telling stories around campfires for hundreds of thousands of years. Written language has only existed for 5,000-10,000 years, and the proliferation of books began less than 500 years ago. The spoken word is the proper way for stories to be told, books are purely archival media.

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not interested unless it can read whatever text I ask it to, pleasantly, with convincing intonation. Apple hobbled shit can fuck off

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait to hear the narrator backlash.
    >Fuck the blind, they should be forced to find and pay someone like me to read it for them. If they don't like their options, then too bad, maybe they should have thought of that before deciding to be blind.

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://authors.apple.com/support/4519-digital-narration-audiobooks

    Here are the voice examples, OP too was gay and lazy

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's not perfect and clearly AI generated but apple are the trendsetters in tech and if consumers are willing to accept the less than perfect narration expect this shit to be everywhere in a couple years. I fully expect narration in all forms such as documentaries or video games to follow suit.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Apple never sets trends or implements new technology they're always 5 to 10 years behind.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          yeah, not saying they innovate but other companies do follow suit and if apple starts pushing hard on AI TTS it could be a huge reflection point for the rest of the industry.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          He means trendsetter as in when they do something, everyone else apes them, and he's right sadly.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            yeah, not saying they innovate but other companies do follow suit and if apple starts pushing hard on AI TTS it could be a huge reflection point for the rest of the industry.

            It's not perfect and clearly AI generated but apple are the trendsetters in tech and if consumers are willing to accept the less than perfect narration expect this shit to be everywhere in a couple years. I fully expect narration in all forms such as documentaries or video games to follow suit.

            I thought about it more and realized that Google made a similar move when they gutted community subtitles from YouTube and forced it to be AI only.
            This is definitely the direction the industry the question.
            What other services do you think these companies are going to drop in favor of shitty automation?
            They've definitely already done it with moderation.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      I thought it was going to sound better, to be honest. The examples have a very unnatural flow. I would rather read the book than listen to that for hours. Could be useful for blind people, though.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        I feel like the non-fiction voices were noticeably worse than the fiction ones, for some reason.
        Still, it is an easy choice for non-mainstream books to go with TTS vs not having an audio book at all.

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    narrators sound like robots anyways

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      stop listening to trash read by trash people

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Me listening to an AI voiced audiobook written by an AI while letting an AI code and draw for me.

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    You could do this shit since forever, maybe not on apple devices but I swear that an ebook program I used had the feature. I don't listen to audiobooks though, and the only reason I could see for doing it would be the narrator was very good, which isn't gonna be the case for a computer voice.

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Like all things, the machines will make mass market products but people will still pay for the people. If/When this becomes a big thing I can see a lot more celerity narrators getting in on this or more full on audio dramas of the book with multiple voice actors and music and everything.
    Also I want audiobooks of fanfictions, if I have to settle for AI narrators I'll take them.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      You realize they've had the ability to deepfake "celebrity" voices for a long fucking time, right? Did you not see the poast yesterday where some dude made Sam "lol" Harris out of 30s of training audio?

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hasn't this AI-voice narration been a thing since the 80s.

  13. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >voice "actors" upset about text to speech
    big fucking yikes

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      record yourself on your desktop mic and play it back, it'll sound like shit and not for equipment quality's sake

  14. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    speaking of book technology, why the FUCK haven't publishers used different shades of black or colors for individual character dialogue in books so you can visually see who a line of dialogue was spoken by without having to find a "x said" or going to the start of a conversation and counting lines?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why are zoomers so profoundly retarded?

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        There are some books that have wildly confusing dialogue because seven different statements have been made without a single "x said"
        A conversation early in the stars my destination comes to mind

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Stick to illustrated books less than 10 pages long, zoomer.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            moron I read more than you
            Authors aren't flawless
            Sometimes they shit up prose

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stick to illustrated books less than 10 pages long, zoomer.

        dumb gay

  15. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOO you can't just destroy our livelihood, we entered into a social contract by which we'd devote our entire lives to a craft in exchange for having enough money to raise a family and enjoy ourselves to a limited extent before death! NOOO!!!!!
    haha get fucked retard
    t. person who hasn't yet been destroyed by AI

  16. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI powered art is "better" than human art
    >AI powered chatbots
    >AI powered audiobooks
    >AI powered playbots
    >AI powered X
    Are you shitliords ready for an AI driven redefinition of reality. It's gonna be ultrashit

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Using the Wayback Machine on Wikipedia instead of its comprehensive and exhaustive history feature that shows you exactly which LGBTQ unemployed communist gays made the change and 5000 others like it, suspiciously in the daylight hours IST
      Normies are insufferable

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it's a form over content reply
        cunt

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >using wikipedia at all
        normalgays are gay retards.

  17. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >backlash
    oh no, i might have to learn a useful trade that provides value to the community around me instead of recording myself reading books for people who are too lazy to read

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >oh no, i might have to learn a useful trade
      What are you gonna say when the trades are made obsolete?

  18. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    can you pirate their AI model?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *