>AI art will never replace human art
>I can always tell when something is made by AI Can you really? Everyone who said has gotten BTFO at some point.
>AI art will never replace human art
>I can always tell when something is made by AI Can you really? Everyone who said has gotten BTFO at some point.
this is fucking great
Fake, though, and didn’t happen.
you realise this just blows the fuck out of the pro-AI position?
it shows its intended to deceive and is fraudulent.
>deceive
>fraudulent
Honestly kinda funny seeing you post in as many threads as possible with your limited lexicon.
>try to deceive people
>no how dare you call what it is
you retarded gay
>NOOO AI ART SUCKSS! I LIKE REAL AI!
>lol artgays can't even tell the difference
>y...you decieved me!
kek. artgays really lost
>no don't call me a fraudster
>I TYPED OUT THOSE PROMPTS MYSELF
retard
>heh, check out this neat illutration I've got in 10 seconds for free
>*it's actually better than most human crap*
>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T DO THAT!!! THAT'S... FRAUDULENT!!! YOU NEED TO PAY ME AND WAIT WEEKS INSTEAD! BECAUSE I SAID SO OK?
lmao. it's over for you gays
>don't you dare call me a fraud!
seethe
heh cope more """artist"""
AI is better than you, faster than you, and works for free.
>heh i showed him
fraud
keep coping fren
you're the fraud since you can't draw better than a 3050 kek
i can count my fingers
The one it genned for me is grey as fuck and I wouldn't considering it really aesthetically pleasing. It's not art. It's just something to dick around with, a slot machine to see if it'll come up with something you like or not. Sure, the shit on the right was engineered to be soulless as possible but every brush stroke carried action, intent. I just stringed together some words and pressed generate. In short fuck Leaves.
They're the same picture.
Both are, or will be, controlled by gayMAN
>openAI is not open
propaganda bot spammer
Are you retarded
are you retarded
you just can't stop coping can you?
ironic projection
>show two groups this picture.
group 1, my kid made this
>much soul, it's amazing!
group 2, a machine made this
>soulless trash
Btw group 1, tricked ya.
>nooooo I want to change my answer I hate it now
This is the world we live in.
>here's a bunch of words that don't mean anything
MOGGED AF
That was the point from the start. /ic/ was right for hating AI art, but they are still just powerless. It was never about opinion on AI, it was always about you being expendable and about people being able to do nothing in face of AI research progress. You cannot outlaw it, you cannot hinder its development, you cannot do anything. You are fucked because you like art, this is the part where you fucked up. You believed in human spirit, and that spirit is dead, murdered by machine, so perhaps you should have a nice day too while you are at it, its not like anybody will miss you once AI collects all of your data and creates chatbot that says the same stuff as you. You will forever be clowns just for existing and nothing will ever change that.
Like a month ago we trolled some anti-AI retard with a literal HD photograph of a person. He was critiquing the shit out of it, pointing out mistakes the AI made.
People critiquing art let alone AI art are quite literally mongoloids.
>we le epic trolled a person
this is just proving the motivation of pro-ai retards is deception and fraud.
yea, seems that the majority of pro-ai art are acting with pure hatred
interesting relevant read: fourth proposed law of robotics
it also work with mario
I like the second pic
any of those could be the second picture
Left one looks like Luigi.
k
>breaks statues hand off so he doesn't have to paint it
yeah if its in a museum and the placard says its by AI i can just leave and visit another exhibit
it wont say its by AI, it will say its by the person who made it, idiot. People dont credit the paintbrush brand as the author, or the name of software they used. Its by a person, a person made that art.
It's going to win the ongoing copyright case too. Artcels are DONE.
I know your pepe is AI generated, go fuck yourself OP
The trick is that you need to use an AI that is highly specialized in drawing one particular thing.
The AI that are too "broad" and generalized are good at everything, perfect at nothing.
The AI that are specialized are bad at many things, but excellent at one job.
So when can it do specific furry porn
Pic unrelated
AI art is art. AI code is code.
Proompters are not artists or programmers.
People ordering and eating at restaurants didn't cook the food and are not chefs. clients asking for a website didn't write code themselves and can't be called programmers. People commissioning artists on Patreon or whatever didn't make the art and are not artists. They're getting food and code and art, but they didn't participate in the making of it. They just told someone else what they wanted and got the result.
It's the same with AI. that is the relationship here. People proompt and AI makes, that's it.
cope if you must, and you will, but its objectively true.
>Proompters are not artists or programmers.
It technically falls under the category of writers, so they are artists.
>proompting is artistic writing now
this is some next level mental gymnastics anon
Isn't descriptive writing art? Is Milton not an artist? The way I see it, this is nothing more than a creative exercise!
kek, i actually fell for this bait
ai art is art, but not because wit sob stories use it
>ai will not replace us because it's so bad and can't replicate the sovl
>we also need to regulate it hard so it doesn't replace us
>wanting to be replaced by soulless monstrosities
yes this is the way
Traditional artists > Prompteurs > Digital "Artists" > "Conceptual" Fartists
Prove me wrong.
traditional artists > 3d artist > computer tablet sketching/painting > power gap > everything else
I find it funny when all the anti-AI spam on Artstation got banned and artists do the outrage, again. Like, my moron you spammed, deal with the consequences. You don't even get away with that shit on 4chin.
yet ai shit is being spammed all over this site, reddit etc, curious.
Good thing its being banned professionally
Seethe and check ur ableism
literally irrefutable btw
>write a few words and click 'enter'
>create artwork and express themselves
Lolwut? Learn2draw
>AI arts allows disabled people and retards to express themselves.
It's over... now I have to hate AI art
If that's my 5 year progress, I'd just use SD full time.
Picrel.
How true is the statement that it steals parts of works from unsuspecting artists on the internet? Is that really how it works?
I'm an artist but I'm both worried and excited for AI to get better. I've been making good improvements with my art and I can't wait until we get to the point that I can use AI to bring my drawings to life. I'd never want to use it to make a complete image since that's not really why I draw- I love the idea of the AI extrapolating an entire world off of my own personal style.
I also feel pretty bad about AI getting so good because I really wanted to make Concept Art into my career. I'm feeling pretty lost now, and pretty sad about that.
Yes the hands give it away 😉
No living person or art would ever have more than five fingers as that would be an abomination against nature itself
The hands give it away 😉
Most AI art does have some subtle differences. You can especially tell with how it draws hands/feet. Ultimately its dependent on the user's ability to edit the mistakes out and manipulate the prompts enough to eliminate the distorion
AI art sticks out like a sore thumb because of how it amalgamates so many art styles. Anyway, AI art can't replace human art because humans provide the training data you retards.
smug art types get what they deserve, don't like it? Get into sculpting then.
>implying six axis robots do not exist
Absolutely this, BUT AI+3d printers are taking over shape design as well (some guy is using it to make AI-optimized intake valves for engines out of titanium or some shit)
I've been posting AI generated realistic images around, not saying they were AI, and so far no one's said anything about it being blatant AI or looking funny. 25k impressions across everything so far.
The question is not "are you positive towards AI art, or negative towards it"
The question is "will you accept that it's going to be the thing from now on, or will you go insane"
I'm not using the word "insane" flippantly here. This is going to be the ego death of a generation. It doesn't matter what you think about whether it's good or bad anymore. If you can't adapt to this change in how we think about everything from now on, you will die.
You sound exactly like vr-gays. Accept that your niche technology has no real-world applications and that you are only obsessed with it out of a pathological desire to "live in the future."
>he boils and seethes, unable to even consider the concepts proposed
The monkey cannot understand the tool; it howls in rage and hurts it to the ground.
>he can't BOT meme arrows properly
Give it a few years. AI will advance until you can't afford the hardware to make an image in less than an hour and everything left is gayMAN-pozed services and artists who hate you.
That's completely illogical if anything AI art is getting more and more accessible. Anyway it's only a big deal for people making generic art by the commission. Competent artists will thrive even more.
Cope of century. ALL artgays are fucked, everyone creative is fucked. We figured out creativity is nothing but myth, just taking random facts and misremembering them in pattern searching way is enough to replace all of human creativity. Creatives from now on don't deserve any respect, even the dead ones, since the simplest iterations of textbots that are correct 90% of time are enough to replace them. They prided themselves on the human error that perfect machines would never achieve, but machines are just as imperfect as people, if not more, so it is safe to say they are also more creative then any person on the planet.
Maybe if you mean good artists the abstract painting artists that sling shit on canvas and sell it for 5 000 000 dollars. Yeah, CIA psyop wont go away, lol.
>everyone who’s said that
Nooope.