AI art is making real artists depressed

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    good

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    pwned

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >a chatbot will replace entire call centers
    >replace entire office buildings of developers
    >all porn commission artists on twitter will never see another coom stained dollar
    >voice actors and their entire guild will be made a thing of the past

    Exciting times to not be a hive dwelling urbanite

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >a chatbot will replace entire call centers
      That's been the case for at least a few years now.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Useful chat bots. Not that "If you want to x, type '1'" garbage that drives the customers away.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Until its self hostable no one serious (who was actually paying people before) will use it for dev.
      When that happens I'm packing everything onto my boat and going to northern Canada and not talking to anyone again.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Exciting times to be a basement dwelling suburbanite instead am I right?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Can AI make songs yet?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        there are, it's shit. no point anyways to automate. so many soundcloud gays would pay (you) money to listen it. There's a billion songs, free. (visual) artists have an ego and demand they deserve pay.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It can but those greedy israeliteS wont share their work. What I do is important, what they do should be free and accessible to all.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That's what even the whining twitter artists have realized. Producing disney artworks with AI art generators is going to cause lots of trouble for OpenAI, SD and such.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If you like butt metal, this AI infinitely generates djent music.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >>a chatbot will replace entire call centers
      Companies already do that, and I absolutely HATE IT. Couldn't they wait until AGI is developed? Regular AI is too stupid to do ANYTHING.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Misc Pot capitalism edition?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >a chatbot will replace entire call centers
      God I wish, but that won't happen until boomers are gone, because they want some poor schmuck to air out their grievances to, and not some chat bot.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Same with foodplaces
        They want humans to yell at.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It already happened. It's shit, though

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >at some point AI became able to replicate multivariants of the same piece of data but also innovative ones : news, film, videogame, media of all sorts are concerned.
      >pauperization of most trivial to most seemingly complex jobs involving cognitive tasks is now a reality and hit hard in the 21th century
      >multi-billions so-called creative industries on suicide watch after an economic plan is needed to maintain growth
      >world governments vote universal income so everyone can sink into depression living as a dwelling urbanite to order Prozium-based processed foods while watching AI-generated shit shows all day

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >artist
    >oh no, how did the algorithm know that I'm functionally useless

    >programmer
    >::tries to use AI to increase their productivity:: wow, this shit is fricking awful. no thanks

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      alternatively;
      >programmer
      >uses AI because they don't know the shit it makes doesnt actually work and or creates bugs

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not interested in the vapid takes of some roastie coasting on having holes instead of getting gud

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I feel bad for artists, but not for her because she is a white woman

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Thinking black, brown and Eastern artists are incapable of being insufferable

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I dunno, I'm also wondering if I'm going to have a job by the end of the decade. If this is the public facing stuff, what's in development?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Like what

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Learn a trade, codie
      Office jobs are decadent sheltered bourgeoisie positions relegated to the past along with stage coach drivers

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Which trade?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Carpentry if you want stability but don't mind shit pay. Plumbing if you want to make enough money to justify your physical degradation. Trucking if you don't mind getting cucked by RNG. Car Mechanic if you're actually talented and don't mind dealing with Mexicans. Otherwise, find a good contract-work construction con artist mentor to teach you the ropes.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          sucking wiener
          or taking wieners up the ass

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Taxi, uber, limo drivers are still alive

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          self driving cars

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not even coal mining will be left. We'll have AI powered robots doing that soon. So either you're smart enough to go into AI/ robotics or you're obsolete and have no reason to exist anymore.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    KEK homosexual artists completely, eternally BTFO. Git gud or let AI destroy your shitty career forever.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/Qb8SWjf.png

      Fricking morons, Art is a way of expressing yourself, the greatest work of arts do that. El Eternauta is the perfect exemple of that, the author pretty much died writing this. TempleOs is another good one, It's like taking a dive into Terry's psyche. I don't give a frick about these generic twitter commisions and ai prompts, they mean nothing. Things like nausicaa valley of the wind, Serial Experiments Lain and Superman (≈1940 version) are real art, they have a meaning.

      https://i.imgur.com/Qb8SWjf.png

      Fricking morons, Art is a way of expressing yourself, the greatest work of arts do that. El Eternauta is the perfect exemple of that, the author pretty much died writing this. TempleOs is another good one, It's like taking a dive into Terry's psyche. I don't give a frick about these generic twitter commisions and ai prompts, they mean nothing. Things like nausicaa valley of the wind, Serial Experiments Lain and Superman (≈1940 version) are real art, they have a meaning.

      Based, Caveman were surviving when they were hunting and picking veggies, not when they were expressing themselfves with their stunning cave paintings

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It used to be that the most renowned artists were hired for jobs such as picrel and their works transcended the era they were made in. Now whiny b***hes that used to screech "everything is art" like in OP's video will have to resort to Onlyfans. I couldn't be more giddy for the comeuppance kek.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I miss beautiful buildings. So tired of modernism cancer.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Logical conclusion to all this is living in a matrix style pod being hooked to serotonin machine 24/7 while AI takes care of us.
    Butlerian Jihad is a necessity for maintaining humanity as we know it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >while AI takes care of us.
      why though?

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    archaic drawing methods are quickly going the way of the horse and buggy. it'll be a cool party trick but nobody in their right mind would pay to travel via horse and buggy when they can call in a more convenient uber for cheaper. the market waits for no one. fortunately, you (artpoors) have the opportunity to learn how to draw higher quality art using AI from the fine community at /sdg/! join us before it's too late and you can't afford your rent

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Computer, generate me a pathfinding algorithm to traverse a grid given a risk-level grid to find optimal pathways of least-risk.
    >Done.

    Ok, now plot a pathway from the top-left to the top-right using the risk-grid found in file Advent-of-Code-2021-Day-15. Calculate the lowest risk for that path.
    >The lowest risk is one thousand, one hundred and forty eight

    Some day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      1148? should I lurk mora?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Post it on /ic/. They mald over AI more than they talk about art these days.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What about how AI art is getting people addicted to creating it and it having an extremely negative impact on their lives that's the real story.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >people who used to spend all day looking at porn someone else made now spend all day looking at porn their GPU made

      Not really much of a story tbh

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It means prostitutes have to go back to actual whoring.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Jealous of people with talent
    >Genuinely can't play the tape forward and imagine art being even more stagnant and derivative
    Yeah bro, software totally replaces art. Let's just remix for all eternity with zero new input

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >even more stagnant and derivative
      I've been thinking about this a lot recently. Archeology/paleontology/geology and probably some other fields have frozen "the present" at 1930 or something because everything newer than that is hopelessly contaminated with nuclear radiation from 20th-century tests. We currently live in a world where the web is already too polluted with AI content (mostly text but now images too) for it to be real training data for a new AI system. It would become trained on wrong AI bullshit and produce even wronger AI bullshit. At some point people will freeze the "present" for AI training data at 2010 or something, or else AI is only down from here. And if it is frozen, that means it will be trivial to identify an AI because they will have no knowledge of any event more recent than that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The only new input required are a few innovative pictures from the top 0.1% of artgays for stable diffusion to learn and understand everything about that new style/flavor/whatever you wanna call it. If you aren't part of that small elite group (hint: you're not), you have literally no market value and should consider buying kneepads

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >only the top 0.1% of artgays are necessary
        Always has been dot meme

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Even if the art looks visually stunning, does it really have any meaning? Wich is more valuable, an expressive piece of art coming from your average Joe or a visually stunning piece of art coming from an artist, who draws for a living?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not only does it have "meaning" but it has the "meaning" of the whole history of human "meaning" baked into it you fricking moron. Cope harder.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            > Cope harder
            I'm pro-AI moron, It's just that shitty twitter commisions and beautiful prompts have absolutely nothing to express, there's no story behind those.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There was an argument I remember coming up a few years ago in regards to truckers. It was probably about the time of the Tesla semi truck announcement. Basically boils down to the fact that tons of truckers are in their 50s and 60s, they aren't people who will be going back to college and getting some white collar jobs. We should all consider the inverse of this situation and the potential ramifications as well.
    Tons of people who work in front of a screen are 100% totally incapable of doing anything but that. There are legions of socially moronic, autistic, emotionally unstable people with no other marketable skills. These people are 100% dead weight who will literally never be able to adapt to any other lifestyle than the one a super easy white collar or WFH environment affords them

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Programmers can probably retrain into accounting and other professions that require functional but not PhD level math. With that said companies that live or die by their app/website aren't going to leave that to an AI, it's a useful tool but they'll want a person they can fire signing off on the final code. It might reduce the number of white collar programming jobs per company although work tends to expand to meet the capacity of the employees.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is there any actual real example of someone getting fired and being replaced by stable diffusion?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Probably not yet, but things like so called AI upscaling is making its way into videogames for art assets. It won't be long until its normal to see games with totally AI generated textures, slowly eating into the market for actual industry artists.
      Thousands of websites right now run chatbots for customer assistance and the good ones are so conversational that it seems like a real person. This same tech applies to telephone customer support lines too, its not just a prompt that tells you to press a number if you have X problem, its an automated human voice talking to you in full sentences.

      This tech is exploding and even 1 year from now its going to be taking jobs from people who have zero backup plans in life.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I guerantee you that in 5 years when you buy a D&D Rulebook, you will see mostly shit from Midjourney there.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not yet, AI art is still in its infancy. When people say they're afraid of being replaced by AI, they don't mean now, they mean a decade from now.
      It's like saying are there any examples of coachmen been replaced by cars, when the only cars available have a speed of 5mph and make noise that will shatter your eardrums.

      Also a lot artists survive off of commissions, not a full time job, once AI art becomes good enough those people are the first ones to go.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >decade
        lol
        lmao

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'd like to lm her ao, if you know what I mean.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The only people who think AI isn't going to utterly and permanently and irreversibly alter art/porn/humans/society/whatever are
            1) medically moronic
            2) religiously incapable of thinking such a thought
            3) those who have not yet seen what it is capable of
            4) copers
            5) late to the party
            or some combination of the above.
            It is both already over and just beginning. Simultaneously.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Uh huh.
              Keep spinning the gacha wheel, monkey.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >t. has never used Stable Diffusion
                For hacks, there's definitely an element of loot-drop to it. However, once you get inside and begin to intuit the contours, the actual challenge is finding a combination that will churn out hundreds of high-quality images. What this involves is a very high-level of autism and creating innumerable minutely-varied contact sheets full of drafts over the course of hours/days. But hey -> keep telling yourself it's all luck. I'm sure that will save you from getting misted by a Boston Dynamics murderbot you fricking coping midwit frick lmao.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Thinks they'll use bots
                More like they have an AI generate a plague to kill everyone that doesn't have the AI generated cure.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I've used it quite a bit actually, but feel free to write another wall of inane cope.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >t. nophoto e-girlcoper
                Get fricked, basic babby b***h.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >>t. nophoto e-girlcoper
                What the frick does this even mean? Medication. Please.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                So basically you gacha until you find a prompt that gives you the same 2-star character hundreds of times? Damn bro, you're really selling this well

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/qqr1MMr.jpg

                >t. nophoto e-girlcoper
                Get fricked, basic babby b***h.

                >hundreds of high-quality images
                >posts this crap
                lmao

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >will churn out hundreds of high-quality images
                >pic is the worst use case for the tech

                As a guy who loves SD, you're a fricking moron.

                For starters, your image looks like shit. And for crap like that, you're better off literally just making a 3D model and render it from different angles and poses. SD is just one of the many tools you can use for content creation automation. There's a lot of talk about the "artificial intelligence" aspect of this new wave of tools, but that's because the media loves buzzwords. It really boils down to automated content creation, AI or not.

                https://i.imgur.com/oQTA8V3.png

                Uh oh...
                It's going to get a lot funnier really soon.

                Disney may not own the copyrights on those particular images but they own the trademark on the idea and image of mickey.
                They also own at least some of the data used for training and if they can prove that in court, it's an extra argument.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Artists being replaced by AI
              AI will likely reach a wall where everything looks the same and is so over produced anything good get buried underneath it all.
              Any decent artists will just just have their style and art consumed asap to feel the machine.
              Dystopian, but quite fun, Artists will adapt, as they always have and always will.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That's a man.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >they mean a decade from now
        how moronic are you ?

        concept artists are already done, you can churn out literally thousands of high quality concept art images per day with decent hardware

        not that I'm laughing, I'm a developer by trade, and within the next five years my job as an enterprise dev will be practically obsolete

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You're not going to convince people, anon. Either people have sat down and experienced the humbling, hubris-destroying fact of AIs imminent takeover, or they have not. It is not a wordcel battle to be fought. One way or the other, they will be made to see. And once they have seen, they will marvel. And they will stop typing their ridiculous cope.

          > Cope harder
          I'm pro-AI moron, It's just that shitty twitter commisions and beautiful prompts have absolutely nothing to express, there's no story behind those.

          There is nothing but story you thankless ridiculous frick. It is an electronic expression of the whole history of humanity and the collective human unconscious at your fingertips. You think it was made by cobbling together twigs at random? Have some fricking respect.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            > whole history of humanity.
            Don't care, AI still isn't capable of creating something as meaningful as TempleOS or Lain. Art ain't only about visuals. It's also about our simple day to day lives, Whom most artgays have forgotten.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >TempleOS
              I don't talk to literal schizophrenics. This is your last (you).

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/KpPKMSv.jpg

              >TempleOS
              I don't talk to literal schizophrenics. This is your last (you).

              What's the ~~*meaning*~~ behind this visual masterpiece? ( x1000 Way better than artgays; good prompt)

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                i was trying to do a goth girl apocalypse and largely succeeded
                my primary post-art post-human post-society dopamine-on-demand visual interests lie in goth girls

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >When people say they're afraid of being replaced by AI, they don't mean now, they mean a decade from now.

        Want to know how I know you are a dog?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, now graphics designer had a very fast prototyping tooling, but twitter coomer Artist are on verge of death and stock imagen creators.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >twitter coomer Artist are on verge of death
        Wrong
        There is story telling in the coom art even. (okay, with some of it)

        Yeah I remember sounding this alarm for years at this point. I'm anything but communist but if AI takes 90+% of jobs and there aren't enough new jobs being generated maybe it really is the best way forward. Capitalism cannot function if 90% people don't have a job.

        The intention is genocidal. Either realize that or expect to die. They would rather burn food than let you have the capacity to act autonomously.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Black rock inflates the housing prices and has AI landlords.
          The current cost inflation is an artificial result of price fixing that has little correlation to actual production.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Simple supply and demand. The AI wouldn't raise prices if people aren't paying top dollar for it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, this shit is so easy that there will be an oversaturation of "prompters" so it will pay pennies because anyone with okay hardware will be able to do it. Maybe venezuelans or africans will benefit from this kek. Like captcha solvers.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    BOT ignoring the fact that ChatGPT can make basic websites and shaders already thinking their shitty programming job is safe

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >nooooo it can create template code that is ALMOST as good and nowhere near as reliable as a 2002 WYSIWYG web editor
      I'm shaking.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >When you point out AI art fricking blows and can't actually make usable files
        >YEAH WELL IT'S ALWAYS GETTING BETTER

        >When you point out AI programming exists
        >NOOOOOOO IT WILL ALWAYS BE SHIT

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Difference is apophenia cannot be applied to math. You can convince yourself that a blob of meaningless pixels is a face, but you can't convince yourself that clicking a button doesn't cause your website to crash.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            https://keen-marshmallow-2b4ea4.netlify.app/

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not pressing that. Give me the tl;dr.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                it makes the text disappear and reappear

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Neat.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Hey, so you know how third-world programmers proliferate the industry despite being shit, because they are cheap?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          No, because all of the companies that tried outsourcing ultimately payed the price. Just ask Boeing. If Pajeets didn't deter us, what makes you think MechaPajeet will?

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >laugh at artists one day
    >get assblasted by AI that can program the next
    /g/

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >not an artist
      >not a programmer
      I just enjoy the ride, bro.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I literally don't see this happening and there's dozens of ChatGPT threads lately

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Someone has to integrate that code into a project.
      Anyone can generate a picture with a few words.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    AI will never replace real art. Too much it cannot do and human beings can still make unique stuff computers will never touch. AI is just another form of tracing.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Just draw whatever the homosexual A.I. companies ban

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Huang Ding Sheng and his grey market compute cluster in Hong Kong will run an AI bot to draw all the things major governments restrict

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Online porn is banned in china

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Theres over a billion of them stuffed into a concrete ant hive with endless nooks and crannies to hide in. Being illegal never stops anything from happening.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Seems a waste of time generating anime breasts if your risking life imprisonment. Might as well do some really fricked up shit if the punishment is the same

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You are fricking delusional if you think that will force them to miss out on this massive business opportunity.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Fricking morons, Art is a way of expressing yourself, the greatest work of arts do that. El Eternauta is the perfect exemple of that, the author pretty much died writing this. TempleOs is another good one, It's like taking a dive into Terry's psyche. I don't give a frick about these generic twitter commisions and ai prompts, they mean nothing. Things like nausicaa valley of the wind, Serial Experiments Lain and Superman (≈1940 version) are real art, they have a meaning.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I think you're mostly right, but there will inevitably be great artists who learn how to express themselves via AI, they just haven't happened yet because the genre is in its infancy. What we have now is a flood of absolute fricking dogshit with no filter.

      That's also the crucial difference between visual art and music. Music has always been a flood of dogshit, but there are filters all over the place. Radio, playlists, rym, they are all filters. Social media is a fricked up filter because it's linked more to the consumer's individuality than the artist's. I don't have answers for this, just noting that everything is changing real fast at the moment, and its not like it wasn't already changing real fast.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >these gays laughed at truck drivers getting replaced by automated trucks
    >they're actually the ones getting replaced

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Jimbob the welder has more job security long term than a 6 figure salaried dev
      This was always inevitable. The tech industry is a bubble.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I hope artists becomes the new 40%

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Have you guys open your OnlyFans account yet? I just bought a few furry paws. Going to try my luck with those weirdos. Wish me luck!

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    IT won't be affected.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You're delusional if you think a lot of people working in IT won't be affected and lose their jobs to AI.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Artists are always depressed anyway.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >actual artists
    >incorporate AI into their workflow to speed up sketching and exploring different ideas, etc
    >talentless hacks who exists solely on porn commissions
    >cry and shit themselves as they realize they have always been replaceable
    Oh no, so sad.

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    OH MY HELL THIS DUMB b***h LITERALLY SHOWS HERSELF USING A PHOTO WITH A FILTER OVER IT AS A BACKGROUND HOW THE HELL IS SHE GONNA LOOK ME IN THE EYE AND COMPLAIN ABOUT AI ART

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it's ok when artists use it
      secret club and all that

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They will get over it. I know they will get over it because computers are hopelessly better at math than humans and yet we still have mathematicians, physicists, accountants, etc. This only replaces the most trivial parts of their job. It's like I've been saying, any artist malding about AI is not a good artist.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yep, this is a powerful new TOOL, it will change how art is made but it won't make artists obsolete (and yes, that includes people using AI to create art, they are, in fact, artists)

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You might as well try to argue that the cotton gin won't make your Black workforce obsolete

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Midjourney is already able to instantly realize 90% of all basic-corporate-b***h stock-image-product needs for $50/mo. I think you really misunderstand what most "artists" actually do when it comes to the professional aspect of their work. Most "artists" make BULLSHIT for corporate MORONS. And that whole thing is now and officially and forevermore finished.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          let me be more specific, it won't make all artists obsolete
          plus remember i'm including people who use ai to make art as artists

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Math is much more than just arithmetic (the only "math" computers are good at).

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Programming is much more than just arithmetic.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I meant to say "moving data", but you get the gist of it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >arithmetic (the only "math" computers are good at).
        lol. clearly you have not written a computer algebra system

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Even if that was true, part of one's job would be to verify that the computer is giving the correct output. So artists can verify whether the AI art looks like shit or not and fix it.

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    we won by doing nothing, again

    useless artists seethe

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    having an art career outside of having ties in a major company is a lot similar to having a career as a streamer or a "professional gamer"
    If, for some reason, the industry gets fricked, you have no alternatives.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >digital artist
    >real artist
    why don't they undo their life like they undo their lines

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I wish they would all kill themselves already so I can stop hearing them whine

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    As an artist, I'm not depressed about AI making art, because I still enjoy making it and something else (whether it be AI or another human) doing it as good or better than me doesn't really bother me. But I am worried about my future financially speaking. Sure, you could say "get a different job" or whatever but I feel like no matter what I pick i'll either: 1) have no relevant experience or 2) it'll be something else that'll be replaced by AI in a matter of years.
    The biggest problem with AI is how it threatens job security imo, not just with artists but with just about every profession. The job market is already competitive enough and I can't help but think AI is just going to result in mass homelessness and poverty while the rich get even richer, which isn't a good formula for societal stability.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah I remember sounding this alarm for years at this point. I'm anything but communist but if AI takes 90+% of jobs and there aren't enough new jobs being generated maybe it really is the best way forward. Capitalism cannot function if 90% people don't have a job.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Capitalism cannot function if 90% people don't have a job.
        not him. but where do you think we are? those roastie office jobs is white women welfare. look at OP pic, she looks like she's gonna be a future HR lady.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Why would the rich need capitalism when they have disarmed slaves who eagerly cheered on their own relegation?

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i dont understand what has made these artists so upset. i create music myself but i dont feel threatened in the least because ai music will not make it any less fun to create something myself. i enjoy the process and love art for the sake of it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Drawgays have been and will always be the most deranged in terms of content creators.
      t. writegay

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Music is kinda different too, in that there's a real performance aspect baked in. I'm a guitarist and a computer might be able to write a song, but it can't shred Yngwie licks like I can (and even if it could, nobody would care outside of the novelty aspect of seeing a robot play guitar).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      me too. Art is art just because ai can create art doesn’t mean your art is worthless now. Or maybe ai is just exposing these “””artists”””

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Artists are the equivalent of codemonkeys in the creative world, except their egos are significantly more inflated. They can't comprehend how easily replaceable they are despite the fact they all draw in same generic photobashed style.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        (Meant drawgay artists)

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >except their egos are significantly more inflated.
        This is why I'll never stop shitting on artpoors, it's fun seeing them knocked down a few pegs.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        being good at art is essentially being good at shapes and form. That is it. No wonder an AI can do it easily.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm in a similar boat with music. I play a couple of instruments and occasionally compose, but I do it for its own sake. I'm also savvy enough to know that making a living from it is an uphill battle so I'm in different career that's profitable but one that I still enjoy decently enough. Artpoors just seen delusional in that they think they deserve to be paid well no matter the market conditions. It's simple supply and demand, "artsy/musical/other fine arts" fields will always have a very heavy imbalance against the worker's favor. Unless you're pavoratti-tier in talent, you'll probably be working extremely long hours for a slave income, assuming you are good enough to make money to begin with.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      All artists have a fantasy about being able to live off of their work even though only a small portion of them get to do it professionally. However being able to live off making music is even more unlikely because you have to be a celebrity or film composer, so I think most people who make music have accepted it's just a hobby

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >i create music myself but i dont feel threatened in the least
      You don't feel threatened because AI music is absolute shit, AI Music research and development has been intentionally blocked and stalled because it touches the israelites' turf of the music industry. AI art went forward only because it automates their money laundering operations in art without having to involve some random bucko taping bananas to a wall

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ok, /misc/, you're boring me again. Say something about Sandy Hook. I mean what even is a sandy hook? It's gotta be stage name. Go on, say something like that.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Frick art, the sad thing is, these frickers will pull the plug on progress right before it starts to affect them. Wake me up when I can prompt "Code me a search engine that respects privacy and doesnt give me cancer"

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    should i even bother going through my web development course?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      People with an IQ of between 95-115 are going to be having a ton of trouble.

      Abso-fricking-lutely not. Lmfao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. JS + (HTML + CSS), frontend -> Vue or React. Easy money.

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    These discussions are so fricking dumb. In a year artists will have gotten over it as they realised it's over but we will be talking about the same shit but with some other fricked profession Maybe writers or musicians. Whatever, just implement UBI.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Whatever, just implement UBI.

      Agree, but more coherent would be something like the Norwegian Oil Fund.

      The United States of America AI fund. Leave it open source and then when Pepsi wants to "borrow" our dataset to sell us sugarwater, they pay the fund.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >writers or musicians
      Good text generation has been out way longer. GPT-3 existed way before ChatGPT yet I don't hear authors b***hing. In fact I can tell a shit ton of authors use that shit now, especially with CYOA type of stories.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        How/why do you think that authors use it?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Word counts steadily rising. This site for example: https://www.choiceofgames.com/
          500k word stories were practically unheard of but now a lot of their new stories are like that

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Won’t AI help us achieve a future where artist can produce art just for the sake it? Because all the manual labor work will be handled by AI robots?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Obviously not, you think any of these top companies give a single frick or that the government gives a single frick no matter which country you live in

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Million dollar specialty robot for every single given manual labor position ever vs worthless people are forced to live as serfs and work hard labor or diet violently
      I wonder which is more likely

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >specialty robot
        Have you ever had a fricking job? I worked in a Korean edutainment sweatshop with 50 workers and could literally, and I mean
        >literally
        replace every single writer / illustrator TOMORROW with a $4000 rig from Amazon and a coffeemaker.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Are you brain damaged or is this a botpost lmao

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >cope
            Your days are numbered, meatbag. Just relax and enjoy the ride.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Per worker or do you expect on machine to do the job of 50?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            We had ten white foreigners writing children's books. We had ten illustrators, ten translators, ten proofreaders, and a bunch of weird fricking admins who didn't seem to do fricking anything. We managed to send about five books a week to press. I could probably get close to that in a day with enough caffeine and a good nootropic stack.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You're realizing that the process is not why they're angry over this.

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >This video
    I can't take arthomosexuals seriously anymore.

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >all hobby professions gone
    >programming gone in 3 years
    >80% of population gonna be working as electricians and welders
    Is this the utopia I was promised

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why the frick do morons think welding won't be automated?

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >AI cant do trad
    NGMI

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Probably talking about actually painting it. But robotics is also advancing rapidly so who knows what will happen.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I mean its possible, you just need a robot arm to hold a pencil or a shoot paint onto a paper or canvas correctly, but you have to build that mount, I mean most people have a 3D printers, so they got something that can move on a xyz axis. So it is possible, but you cant draw on the fly or anywhere. But it would mean you have to a good artist anyways.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Also there's a reason why CGI/VFX in movies looks terrible now, it got into the hands of pajeets who dont know a lick about drawing/painting at all. Now all CGI looks terrible and bland.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        let me see a hand

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          fresh bake just 4 u

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Is there a reason you're generating images of trannies?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Wtf that's good. We are prob in for interesting times soon when people start generating celebs.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >start
                https://huggingface.co/hassanblend/evamendes

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                NTA but I'm almost kneeling. Almost.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >start
                There have been about as many emma watson fakes as pepes posted on this website the past 6 months

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Or of people they know irl

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Just wait till neuralink is released

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >believe a con man's lies
        ngmi

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not me
    When i figure out how to make good art i'll learn how to combine it with AI(basically use as reference or paint over it.)
    also follow
    https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/41125292
    https://twitter.com/DrawingSvin

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Watch the death of web socializing in 3 years. As everyone realizes it's all AI chatbots, AI articles, AI ads. What's even the point

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >not wanting an AI gf

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Good. Frick 'em. Copyright is a spook

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Artists said 2 weeks ago AI is souless crap no one is buying that can't into commissions or hands. Why the drama?

    And based whoever this was

    [...]

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      AI art is simultaneously utter trash and also taking all our jerbs. If your IQ is as low as the average twitter artist, you can hold both these positions simultaneously.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        When you get a feel for the average person's tastes (or work in any globalized/democratized industry), you understand these are not contradictory positions

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          True, the average person has zero taste, and thus isn't likely to pay for comissions. Nothing is still being "taken" from them, art is simply being made accessible to everyone with a decent computer.

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is this artists hate thread now? Wow I didnt know artist were so hated, I guess you guys have never consume any product that involved graphic in your life if this causes you so much hated.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The voices in my head are telling me artists are pretentious

      Arch btw

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What the hell are you talking about?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      "Artists" are all bland troglodytic luddites that have no place in society. They are dead weight and it's high time they bow down to us, their superior masters.

      WE are KINGS
      YOU are DOGS

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I love artists that aren't "artists" (read that as israelites that want to murder everyone).
      I fully sympathize with their plight. Pure artistic renditions, such as paintings, are very hard to monetize, and are usually only ever done for a particular buyer on commission. They're losing a whole bunch of potential buyers to a system that may potentially be using their art as reference. I'm not just concerned for altruistic reasons for them though. If this issue isn't solved fairly, then say hello to a future of paintings being sold with drm attached to them. The horror.
      So please, remember to support good artists in this time of transition for them, engineers are very much like artists too.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Its the reaction really. We got a really good piece of tech that corporations have had for a while into the hands of the people and the first reaction from the art community was to attempt shame every major art hosting site into banning ai art and attacking people who used the ai as a tool in any capacity. Its become almost political, like if you use ai art you are a bad person with no talent and deserve to be harassed.

      https://i.imgur.com/aZI3HNR.jpg

      So what do you homosexuals do for a living, that gives you a right to make fun of hard working artists?

      >inb4 neets
      have a nice day

      I'm a professional 3d artist and amateur game dev. Eventually everything I do will be automated too, same for every job. Artists aren't special and the community needs to be calling for UBI, not attacking people for finding the tech cool.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oh wow a piece of technology that threatens to replace you and the people using it keeps shitting on you while constantly using your work in order to improve their tech.
        Yeah I am definitely a selfish piece of shit and should feel ashamed for even try to defend yourself and think bad about ai people.

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, praise your genocide goyim. The golems make porns for you, worship them.

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So what do you homosexuals do for a living, that gives you a right to make fun of hard working artists?

    >inb4 neets
    have a nice day

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i'm not making fun of artists for being artists, anon

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You guys are just like the artgays when they thought the AI was shit and would never replace them, the box has been opened, just wait.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Praising a few corps monopolizing all production with AI
      >Thinks programming is not next.
      Still a ways to go:
      >Encoded meaning by the individual
      >Gesturing, narrative, symbology
      >Aesthetic difference from different hardware (the human brain, the AI transformation matrix)
      >Linear thinking on the subject faltering when you realize digital and analog already are a division and analog media is still incredibly popular despite the scale of digital media.
      >Neural Network based media has the inherent structural question of accessibility to an extent even greater than digital media
      >Process that is fundamentally different due to the mechanical production of art with human hands
      >AI art's ability to impressively render but than blend/distort things in ways even novice artists wouldn't
      >It continues to fail at text, even the latest models fail at it.
      >Replication problem, different versions of AI art produce different aesthetics with the exact same prompts. That is why there is a reliance on img2img and inpainting along with paintovers to compensate for the issue.

      Programmers will be replaced sooner than artists. Ballsy prediction to make on BOT until you realize art has the inherent ability to be tied to identity in ways programming alone does not. The intention is to replace every job, they're just too lazy to replace the manual work but the farm romanticists forget that tons of robotics have been in use in farm labor already.

      Its the reaction really. We got a really good piece of tech that corporations have had for a while into the hands of the people and the first reaction from the art community was to attempt shame every major art hosting site into banning ai art and attacking people who used the ai as a tool in any capacity. Its become almost political, like if you use ai art you are a bad person with no talent and deserve to be harassed.
      [...]
      I'm a professional 3d artist and amateur game dev. Eventually everything I do will be automated too, same for every job. Artists aren't special and the community needs to be calling for UBI, not attacking people for finding the tech cool.

      Game Development is so many layers of process, action, simulation and reliant on finding a balance + fun (and having AI find fun is a dubious concept, statistic approaches just produce skinner box games as already seen) that you probably would need some post-singularity AI to pull it off.

      Not even coal mining will be left. We'll have AI powered robots doing that soon. So either you're smart enough to go into AI/ robotics or you're obsolete and have no reason to exist anymore.

      >No reason to exist as a drone for the rich anymore
      That's what it actually is about. If the wealthy don't see value in you they'll be fine with you dying in an artificial famine.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Automation can be used to empower. The demoralization propaganda of AI as a means to make you irrelevant is meant to keep you from thinking of ways to use it for your own ends and goals. They want you to feel like a worthless drone to break your sense of critical thought and maintain their lie of artificial scarcity. Don't fall for it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Think about it. "Get a different job" is a weak response, one demanding you abandon dreams. Don't fall for it. Those "real jobs" are on the chopping block too. Part of the idea is to foster such divisions. Really this "artists will be replaced" talk is a propaganda format. think about it. Why the frick should higher amounts of automation mean you do more menial labor? That makes no sense. It's bullshit peddling through and through.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Automation can be used to empower.
          >Internet can be used to democratize knowledge.
          Same energy. Didn't happen.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            True. However it is short sighted to assume anything with regard to AI and what it means to artwork either way. However it does communicate a more clear general intent, one that has been clear for years. The purpose of automation is a genocidal one and has been the whole time. I just didn't realize they'd be this blatant about it.

            https://i.imgur.com/KyTD4ye.jpg

            >i create music myself but i dont feel threatened in the least
            You don't feel threatened because AI music is absolute shit, AI Music research and development has been intentionally blocked and stalled because it touches the israelites' turf of the music industry. AI art went forward only because it automates their money laundering operations in art without having to involve some random bucko taping bananas to a wall

            Until someone uses some independent system or other country that doesn't give a shit goes for it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Lol, the same smoke and mirrors as e-mail and http. Now we're near the corner of needing physical atestation to power on "your" personal computer and there're plans for native DRM. It just won't happen. It'll be hoarded by the 3% to make themselves richer while they let the rest of the world starve. People is just too careless and moronic to push back.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >AI can't blend with le sovl
        Dude my very modest $3000 computer is currently baking 600 shibari goth girl photographs from Alphonse Mucha.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They still say that and call it gacha but then say prompts give perfect replicatable copies. Us being displaced doesn't change the fact that artists are mendacious idiots.

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Someone make an ai image of her in the thumbnail but with big breasts and revealing clothing and send it to her

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I posted that already, why do you only react when it's from GOOGLE youtube?

    frick you

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why? It's the only way I've had any time to "make" art in the past two months. If it weren't for AI art I wouldn't have come up with a lot of the cool ideas I have now. It's not even that hard to get it to generate designs close to your own style that you can draw later on. People need to chill lol

  56. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is actually horrible. I'm not an artist, but hard work and effort are the traits I respect in another the most. Good artists have worked for years, and they're just being replaced. I know it sounds like I'm just an artist coping, but I swear I'm not, I just can't help but feel sympathy even though it's inevitable that they'll be replaced.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I mean most people who arent in their edgelord phase agree with you. But like wtf can we do, we are at the mercy of our system, we let cancer ridden people accumulate millions in debt. The government doesnt care, the companies dont care. Artists only choice is to learn something relevant for the job market. It's the truth they need to hear to survive, no one is gonna be able to save them.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They're not even being replaced. It's just a tool like Photoshop or Procreate. They can either learn to use it or be a real artist and learn traditional which no technology can replace.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >dig ditch
      >fill ditch
      Honest to god, back breaking hard work. Doesnt mean your entitled to other peoples work because you worked hard.
      Hard work != useful work

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Time to be like me, Derek Taylor (Aka DistroTube), and suck BIG BLACK wiener for a living.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sucking BIG BLACK wiener cured my depression

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sucking BIG BLACK wiener cured my depression

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      kek, is bee bee cee the only thing that won't be automated in the future? So much cope here to "git gud", it's not a sport morons. It can already do trad Monet paintings EZ which takes god tier skill. Art has reached its limit, it's over for artgays, get a new hobby.

  58. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This artist did NFTs so there was little sympathy from both sides for her.
    Artists doing art only for money need to frick off.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I agree with this 100%, the people complaining likely never cared about art as a hobby to beginw with and are only interested in the money

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        People do need money to survive despite automation since artificial scarcity to bludgeon people in a neo-maoist fashion to menial labor is the point.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This is all design, automation methods that improve people's lives aren't what the people with money give a damn about.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Then those artists should get real jobs. With the amount of fricking time they spend whining on twitter, they could easily make enough to fund the art hobby. It's not like they're using that time to draw anyways.

  59. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Just wait for generative music, albums, artists. There will be blood.

  60. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  61. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    90248604
    No (you)s for copers.

  62. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Good? That's a positive thing. Welfare is a zero sum game.

  63. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It can be argued that AI can't produce true art or accurately convey a real person's artistic vision. It's still a death knell for the industry though because no corporate suit is going to shell out thousands to hire a pro artist when they feel they can get adequate work done with a $20 / mo AI subscription or whatever.

    I'm interested in seeing whether the artist pushback will begin resulting in lawsuits given the amount of plagiarism involved. Like what's going to happen when an artist can prove that their IP was scraped for an AI marketing campaign? Lawyers are probably going to be the only ones with jobs left at the end of it all.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It isn't at all since a lot of that conceptual art relies on narrative encoding that is simply absent from AI generated artwork. This has been exhaustively explained and every version, module and iteration seen still fails to do that. There is an accuracy limit, there is the inability to keep it on track without lots of helping hands. A concept artist that actually works in the industry is reliable and able to produce such stuff without those caveats. Digital artists are often technicians by habit of how they make use of art programs as well.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why are all autists missing the point so hard? Who gives a single frick about true art when you're slowly getting the means from starving away ripped from you so the bribers can "offer you the solution" which is concede them all uncreative control they want over you? Human brain can't create anything under extreme famine.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Finally the return of the Chad Starving Artist over the Virgin Corporate Cog

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Because the AI proompter believes themselves immune to it or assumes the neetbux will sustain them. Just forget that the US has a political class that wants to destroy social security given the chance and means testing frickery is preferred over UBI which gets laughed at by media pundits. The work humans put into making the society they worked on will be realized to have been a scam to create a class of slave labor that is pure drone.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >the US has a political class that wants to destroy social security
          This is unironically a good thing, most welfare is wasted on useless people.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The only useless people are the rich failsons given corporate welfare and subsidies to protect them from falling under from shit investments.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              ok commie.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Somehow this manages to be the dumbest, most underage post in the whole thread

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              neet detected. get a job fricking loser

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Get a job
                AI replaced all the jobs
                Do you expect people to just die than? They won't. They'll do shit to find ways to keep afloat without any job access, you will need to actually act to kill them. Simple neglect only goes so far.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Real jobs will not be replaced in the next 100 years.
                The trades are in huge demand because people are lazy fricks.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The reason why so few are willing to join trades at least in my country is because they pay shit wages. And even though there is a lot of demand with them they still pay shit wages here.
                It might be different in your country but if they stopped paying shit wages then maybe people would apply for them. But you are right trades will be replaced much later for one simple reason. AI can be used with relatively inexpensive computers while to replace a trade you need a very expensive robot that can costs millions.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Basically it's like maoism

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Force a privileged class to do more menial labor through economic pressure and automation
                >Lower the wages on trades due to more people doing them
                >End up causing a socialist revolt
                >Can't stop it due to the electricians cutting the cables on your bots
                Lol go forward with this it'll work out for you

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Just to prove why people don't apply to trades here's few average monthly salaries that I pulled up:
                Plumbers get paid about 2600 euros a month on average
                Welders get paid 2750 euros a month on average
                Lumberjack gets paid about 2700 euros a month on average

                On the other hand with white collar jobs it's.
                Accountant gets paid about 3350 euros a month on average
                Teacher gets paid about 4300 euros a month on average
                Programmer gets paid about 5200 euros a month on average.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Over here Plumbers easily do $120k US after finishing their apprenticeships.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                What skillet does one ACTUALLY need to know to be a decent plumber?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Trades suck because:
                1) Mediocre pay despite what memes say
                2) dog shit working conditions
                3) the people you work with are awful
                4) good luck meeting a woman
                5) Your body WILL take serious abuse

                "Muh trades" is literally a cope from people talking out of their ass

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                If you die working that's all the better. It's a genocide, anon. Work to death is part of the genocide tool kit. The robot is seen as a more perfect slave.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                yep. it's "viable" in some places because they have guilds/unions to filter pablo, rodriguez, juan out of working there. This will end soon enough.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Same here with Europe. But with us it's Poles and other eastern europeans who are driving down the wages.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Do you expect people to just die than?
                >No weapons
                >No homesteading skills
                >No land
                >The soil has been raped by corporations anyway
                Yes. You will either serve the rich as a slave, or you will die.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I make 6 figures working from home. Try not to fall asleep in your US government class and maybe you'll figure out what social security is.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                This isn't reddit, nobody is going to fall for your pathetic larp.
                If you really did make 6 figures working from home, you will be entirely against welfare.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                This is BOT, dumb tourist. What I just said not particularly hard to attain in STEM, and there are probably a number of others in this thread who can say the same.
                Please, continue coping.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I know it's not hard to obtain that salary, that's why I'm fricking against welfare. Those frickers can easily get that by doing a trade, instead we pay them $50k a year to shit out babies and do drugs.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Morons don't realize the single mantra behind the sucess of globalization: good enough is the worst enemy of good. As soon as they manipulate population into lower their standars for cheaper slop there goes the demand for their prompt's "polishment", an AI will geet close enough for half of the cost or less. 99% of the people use Ikea garbage despiste having all the means to purchse much better furniture available at a blink of an eye. They'll have to compete for sucking the wiener of a few rich snobs or soul crushing corpos that would marginally care about it, and still could just manhandle them due of the high demand.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >artists defending unsustainable generational ponzi for boomers that requires constant changing of how inflation is calculated to not keep making cost of living adjustments
          First you pretend at tech, then law, and now economics? Is this where we're at in the lane stray mini-game?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >More automation means more net productivity
            >We have to cut social security due to lacking the productivity to keep it afloat
            Paradox

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Alright have fun with the 2023 mega recession drying out the fund completely before 2034.

  64. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    90248658
    No (you)s for nophoto copers.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >He doesn't know scripts convert that to a (You) anyway
      Dumb tourist

  65. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >making real artists depressed
    They were already depressed. Nothing has changed there. If they were smart they would take advantage of it and offer to fix generated images in exchange for money. Anything I make is a crapshoot of the hands will be hands or meat clubs. It is much better than it was but it's still not anywhere able to make art like a human yet. The AI can do amazing detail but then it does that detail 85 more times in the same.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >delusional
      You people are fundamentalist meatzealots of a humanism that has been deprecated.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It is time to realize that Humans don't exist for corpos.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >absolute sweatie
          You have to be 18 to post on four channel.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not an artist anon. I generate pictures of my wife in wedding in various beautiful landscapes. I don't care if people don't like it, it's what I like and they can't stop me.
        However my observations are the tech is amazing. However it can't think full picture yet. Without highres fix you get meat monsters, with highres fix you get a nice image that gets fricked after the upscale and sharpen. Some tags lessen that quite a bit though.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I am a wedding photographer by trade and came to Stable Diffusion when I saw the writing on the wall (and who can now offer my clients wild shit as an option), but I'm here to tell you that your inability or unwillingness to use masking and to learn inpainting is your problem, not that of the software or the dataset.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I only use the other options when I get an image I want to fix then run it back through. The shit in the SD thread here is pretty fricking amazing.
            From a concept art generation platform, it's pretty amazing as it can generate thousands of ideas that an actual artists can then take and build upon.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            This is one of the ones I've generated using text to image. I might do some inpainting to remove the extra hair on the right and darken between her legs a little. I don't claim to be good at this, I just enjoy what I enjoy.

  66. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    still looking like shit
    lrn2prompt better

  67. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Economic depression hits
    >Mass layoffs hit, and depressed people quit
    >People stop spending money on twitter artists
    >WAAAAH WHY WOULD STABLE DIFFUSION DO THIS

  68. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I thought artists were already depressed.

  69. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The world wouldn't have so many "mental health issues" if they didn't turn away from God of creation.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bless YHWH

  70. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Uh oh...
    It's going to get a lot funnier really soon.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't mickey mouse public in a couple months. Anyway moronic argument, it's not illegal for anyone to pain mickey mouse (including AI) it's to make money off it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not really any different than if I drew mickey mouse. Its still my drawing but I can't sell it because its a trademark.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Man people REALLY don't understand how "human" law really is in that people ignore laws and all the time and just interpret shit how they like to frick people over. If you think law works like on TV and it's all super highly by the book and autisticly scrutinizing about following things correctly I pray you never end up in court.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I realized this when Los Angeles police did frick all about a dude who was parked in the red for days.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Written laws are like spiders' webs; they will catch, it is true, the weak and poor, but would be torn in pieces by the rich and powerful.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          True but I've also seen cases of working class guys punching WAY above their weight in court just by having a a good strategy. I know this guy who is a White Nationalist that was being sued by some israeli woman along with a bunch of other guys. He managed to get out of the suit by figuring out a way to do discovery on her and her little "anti-hate" org she ran. Well she was so sacred about what he might find she dropped the case against him kek. Being good in a courtroom isn't about being smart really its about being strategic and crafty.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      So now they are conflating transferring styles with infringing trade marks.
      The absolute state.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You know the top 3D market places are full of top selling baby yodas and other disney crap for years under royalty free licenses and disney does not go after them, right? You know Disney is on team AI big time and is making its own, yes?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Disney will have its own AI generator and likely not want other apps making their content.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Disney
        They're on Team Disney-AI, not your AI. This will benefit no one and things will get worse for all of us.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Remember when there was "digital actors" scare a decade or two ago? Now Disney is doing it, and yet no one is giving a shit

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Then what the frick are artists crying to disney for? They even publish their research. There was even a thread on /ic/ last week wanting to cheer on the mouse after crying about Disney's approach to IP for so long. Don't be surprised when that mouse repays them with a scrape

  71. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So much heat for art which doesnt even have celeb culture. Can you guys imagine the absolute fricking chaos when a good music AI comes and people start generating music based of a popular KPOP group with their voices. Literal worldwar 3.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If this happened I would avoid malls, grocery stores, and any entertainment venue for at least a year

  72. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Tradespeople laughing till the guy with a PhD in fluid dynamics is forced to start plumbing

  73. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    https://githubcopilotlitigation.com/
    shut the frick up, you homosexuals are just as b***hy about it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Copilot is different first because Microsoft is charging for it, second in multiple cases people could actually track down exactly where the code that was being generated was taken from, and third no one actually knows how it works or whether Microsoft has taken measures to protect licenses. Stable Diffusion is free and open source, anyone can run it locally and see how it works.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >people could actually track down exactly where the code that was being generated was taken from
        If image search wasn't such a hard problem, you could do this for overtrained stable diffusion models as well

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          LAION's search engine does it somewhat

  74. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is so hilarious. I've never met an 'artist' who wasn't a complete loser. I hope they all kill themselves.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i'll give props to redhead over there for not coping and being a real homie. goddamn I hate this
      >hehe guise it's just anotha tool in teh bucket right guise? right??
      >faster work flow!!
      >reel autists weel survive! we won't get replaced.
      holy cope, makes me seethe honestly.

  75. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    One should consider bombing servers if possible if they see this as an attack on their identity and humanity. The genocidal intention means it is self defense to do so. Attacking the particularly vulnerable power grids is another route...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      People are dumb enough to post their entire work history and city of residence on their social media.
      Incels shoot up a school over not getting any pussy.
      This will not end well for anyone.

  76. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Tbh this has all made me quite depressed. I truly loved the process, but also the community. I have to admit that I also craved the validation more so than money, it felt good being acknowledged by people, especially other artists I looked up to. Met lots of friends in the twitter artist circle and the encouragement to improve together as art friends was wonderful.

    But now it's kinda fricked, community is in a depressing state. The mega surge of all AI art which is better than 90% of artists results in the community being result focused rather than process focused. The ego boost a mediocre artist could get before for being lucky with the algorithm wont happen as theres so much content now that it pales in comparison.

    I wish I did full time art instead of doing comp sci in uni as a way to support myself. Just to have some more of those magical moments and something special to share with my art friends. I didnt know I would miss it so much till it was gone 🙁

    Oh well

    >artgay rant over

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      welcome to what us sound artists have experienced for the last decades or so. We just make and play music for free just for fun and the enjoyment. there's 0 money in it, we even lose money for it. That'll be the future for you.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's worse than that.
      By showing their willingness to automate visual expression and writing, they show a very basic message from the people who run such businesses: We do not care about your voice.
      So why care for them? Fricking them is all that is left, they'll automate everything if they can. They don't care about humanity and should be punished for it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >By showing their willingness to automate visual expression and writing, they show a very basic message from the people who run such businesses: We do not care about your voice.
        >So why care for them? Fricking them is all that is left, they'll automate everything if they can. They don't care about humanity and should be punished for it.

        If you ever worked in anything technical or artistic, you'd know most of the work is mindless and boring as frick. There's no problem trying to automating at least some of it.

        I know there will be some people trying to automate everything. Literally having a whole anime series created from a single prompt. And I have no doubt some of those people might even earn success and the wealth from it. But it doesn't change the fact so called AI generated art is just another tool.

        If you open MS Paint, draw a circle and use the fill tool to color it, you're already using some form of automation because you're not painting each pixel by hand. AI generated art is basically a more complex version of that. If you disagree, you might as well not use computers or smarphones at all.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >An AI generating an entire picture is the same as the digital version of using a flatedge
          I have done drawing by hand, analog and digital and yeah I know how much time it can be. I have also used MJ, SD and DALLE2. So when I say that, it comes from a place of knowing what I am talking about. Tools that aide in the process of developing an artwork are not what you are seeing with prompt driven NN art. The point is to write a line and have an AI generate the pictures. Paintovers, Inpainting/Outpainting and Img2Img sure, does provide layers of editing to the process but the main picture is still AI driven. It is not your voice, it is the fiefdom of the AI that you pass for access to. The cloud I already believe to have been a mistake and the kind of power centralized internet infrastructure, privatized social media and such are all created a kind of monopolizing force that is extremely dangerous for individual freedom. The hatred of human expression is found throughout the social media landscape, AI art is but the next step of that.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            What the frick are you talking about? I can use AI to generate stuff without any internet or "cloud".

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Local Diffusion processing wise will be always multiple steps behind.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                wut. It's literally same model and same algorithm

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm an artist that stays clear of the art community, if you step even a little out of line, they will find you and they will frick you over, just to boost their highly inflated egos a bit more.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Inflated egos
        The proompter community makes the art community look humble seeing their culture of trying to horde prompts to sell.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >culture of trying to horde prompts to sell
          Really?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Doesn't know about PromptBase

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Either you're blind or you actually believe the bullshit fear mongering twitter artists are peddling due to their irrational fear of AI.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Twitter artists say it is a threat (and a bad thing)
            >AI peddler says it is a threat (and a good thing)
            Hmm, wonder why it is being called a threat.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          /sdg/ is comfy and civilized. The same can't be said for /ic/ or troonycords where people come /ic/ now making threads accusing a member of using AI with no evidence even.

          Artists are backstabbing hypocrites who will put on sociopathic virtue signal acts for clout and hunt down sock puppets of their enemies with autistic sleuthing. I am glad AI has ruined your year.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You can always tell when there's an asshurt artist in a coom thread because I've been accused of shitting up threads with ai images when I posted porn I downloaded years ago.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              They'll have to find delight in gaslighting themselves from paranoia.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'd get it more if it was the 2000s where the quality of amateur art on the internet was laughably low and communities were much smaller, but even before AI there were already so many people being so good at what they do that I was intimidated way before all of this. It's hard to stand out or feel special when there is so much competition so I don't really see ai as having changed too much in that regard, the only difference is that the crowding of content was created was a machine

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >artists have already deluded themselves that they weren't a BPD attentionprostitute cesspit before AI
      Haha, oh wow.

  77. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao, she started deleting comments that were made by us.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Archived this video just in case she ever deletes this.

  78. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    If you want to do art and still make money become a tattoo artist. That can't be replaced by AI for now.

  79. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    True artists will never be replaced. Michaelangelo, Zdzisław Beksiński, Jan Matejko, Rembrandt, Vincent van Gogh, these are all figures that work will be analyzed, admired and studied for as long as we humans stand on Earth. All AI does is filter all these Twitter "artists" and their shitty furry OCs, commissions that cost a small fortune and their space-high ego.

  80. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Pajeets are taking over and you will be happy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Forgetting that DeepMind is driving the code monkeys to extinction

  81. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why are "artists" like this but not the people practicing photography?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Photography requires touching grass

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Good photography is a lot more expensive and harder than drawing something good.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      photography isn't an art

  82. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There's certainly some autists in /ic/ raging over AI art.
    A lot of the rage seems to be toward gays who call themselves artists and put in zero effort in the drawing and all that shit.
    The real issue is the gray area that AI has opened up. It'll be a while before these hobbyists strike a balance.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The rage is that it exists. They desperately want to obviate it while simultaneously dismissing it as a passing fad.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      From the start, the people crying the most about this were the ngmi crabs that saw their smug superiority of practicing a year before giving up evaporate.

  83. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why, tho? Did they read sensationalist articles and actually BELIEVED them? Stock photo and clip art companies are in danger, sure. But AI is still can't really replace artist working for company: it have no memory*, can't iterate on images*, can't consistently draw characters it doesn't have in dataset*, etc, etc. Working as an artist in a company is much more than "prompt in, image out". It's very interactive, with lots of back and forth.
    *yes, I know there's ways to do that, but it's flawed and require too much tinkering

  84. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Paintings can't be automated

  85. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I can't wait for ai 3d modeling for prints

  86. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What will Proompters do when they automate the prompts too?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Prompts can't be automated because prompts are special incantations that require a true creative's touch.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >This is what proompters actually believe

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Keep crying Luddite, I'm going to make millions off the backs of your heroes and you can't do anything about it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Make millions with proompts
            Lol
            Just lol

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Luddite chud.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Traditional AI artists are going to disavow using text engines and will keep delivering superior art by using human skills to engineer prompts.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Prompts can't be automated because prompts are special incantations that require a true creative's touch.

      >This is what proompters actually believe

      Keep crying Luddite, I'm going to make millions off the backs of your heroes and you can't do anything about it.

      >Make millions with proompts
      Lol
      Just lol

      Luddite chud.

      stop samegayging, no one cares

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *