AI Art is just the begining. Posted on January 2, 2023 by Anonymous Soon we will have AI that generates music, and AI that generates movies.
AI couldn't even break through the Sicilian Defense and you're telling me it's going to make music.
>AI couldn't even break through the Sicilian Defense
i somehow doubt this
>Implying it's not making music right now
You don't need AI for chess, it's solved. White wins.
>if you don't like AI art you have to like everything that an idiot has ever called "art"
Why are proompters like this?
They’re well aware of their fraud and try to cope with it by constructing any argument that supports them
>makes up retarded strawman to have a point
You're creating your own issues. Not what op said.
You've got it totally backwards, dumb fuck. The AI provides you content so that you will provide it with attention and data. It uses this attention and data to create more content to further ensnare you. The end of this road is not you watching AI movies. The end of this road is you as a ruddy puddle of goo at the bottom of a rendering vat.
>same as it ever was
Top is based
Bottom is boring
there was a really good post about this on here recently, tl;dr top is art because it's all that's left for artists to do, and bottom has been done to death for centuries.
i'm gonna shit on a cake, then throw it to the face of a circus clown, then die while trying to suck a horse cock while dressing as an english guard. Hope nobody did that in this specific order so I can call it art and trascend history
I said it before and I say it again.
The people that don`t like "AI" are the equivalent of the people that tell me that they dont need/like/want a computer and now start to have problems buying a ticket/getting money from the bank/getting news. AKA next gen boomers....
>these are the same people who x
Computers can not generate art, computers generate pretty pictures. That said, most artists don't create art either nowadays.
Yes yes we've made this point
Your meme looks like shit, either use AI or learn2draw
AI generated art is the inevitable response to the abysmal quality of modern human-made "art".
I will never consider literal shit on a canvas "art".
How can you mass shoot people who are just running these things in their homes, disconnected from each other. Do they think we are in an office doing this.
That's the thing, we've seen too much movies where machines/robots/androids are only hyper-rational: They can compute powers of numbers billion times faster than a human with a calculator, and can get to the conclusion that living being should be terminated for the well being of the universe.
Yet people don't realise that we are making them more like humans: adding them randomness and biases so they think out of the box.
When we give humanity to anything, we antropomorphise. When we domesticate anything, it loses its nature. Artificial is synonym of destruction.
Am I the only one who wants a repository with names and proofs of people claiming AI is bad and should be ilegalized?
When those actors then accept AI into their lifes and promote it, because there would be no other option, we know who were deniers and boicot them.
>directly calling for people's deaths
"Is this AI in the room with us right now?"
Finally I will be free to just sit back and consume.
I feel like AI art is best used to draw inspiration from and help out with general concept making. The idiots who fear it, are just lazy and know they produce lack luster shit that people only buy because they can't make it themselves. I can't wait to see how bad the music is when AI starts making it. Again real musicians will mix and match and create masterpieces out of what the AI spits out, but lazy individuals will just cry about it.
AI might be able to generate a movie with frame by frame oversight by a human.
so what will change.
> movies and music controlled by garden gnomes
>movies and music controlled by ai controlled by garden gnomes.
in ~1 year AI will be able to generate comic panels from 50+ page smut fanfiction.
have a nice day Cris
“very impressive painting”
Only if you’re looking at the thumbnail. If you try to actually appreciate it and marvel at the details, it immediately falls apart.
And its not even a painting. I also question whether its reasonable to call the artwork "impressive." Maybe its not the artwork that's impressive as it was easily generated by an AI but rather the AI itself is the one that is quite impressive.
i enjoy any art that's valuable to me
i havent seen valuable ai art, though little art of man made origin are it either
generative music was much earlier than pictures
Well, ze germans banned public music in some towns.
Due to "corona virus"
We've had AI generated music since the early 2000s
>tfw you will never see an AI painting with its vagina
Nobody has ever catched a vagina in the wirld world, it's easier to get a Mewtwo
Dummies don't realize AI is being used right now to make decisions about their life.
They will soon have digital IDs and health passports.
All of their health info, ALL OF IT, is going to be accessible so they can use AI to see the effects of their policies and drugs and vaccines.
All of those people whining about AI art are the biggest users of abortion, drugs, vaccines, booze and every other pharma vice available. They will be red flagged everywhere they go as a risk.
Guess what dummies? You brought this on yourself. You cried and cried about masks and vaccines and therapy and all that other shit and they know you will go along with THAT program. So go ahead and cry about your shitty drawings but just remember you were the pussies who were so terrified and psyoped that you gave them the mandate to use AI everywhere especially for your MENTAL HEALTH WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH
>"Hey sally, look for cheap gyms close to me."
>MFW a machine has decided the fruit used for the juice I'm drinking was appropriate.
>SMART TV with AI
That's what the first sentence was about; after that is just your conspiranoid corpo utopia and covid denial or antivax autismo, so no need to explain on that. Don't know if ironic or unironic tho.
>humans decided my banking fees
anons you are embarrassing. where have you been the last 13 years?
>Mouthbreathing streamer react video
It's fair use!!!!!!
>Legit review over movie footage
>AI text generator doing the same thing as image generators but with written words
NOTHING WRONG HERE!
>you take a bunch of images and make a data set based on them but doesn't contain said images, then generate entirely original content based on instructions and weights
FUCKING THIEVES, MUH COPYRIGHT!!!
>NAI pirates light novels to train their text generator
Nothing wrong here
>Microdick steals licensed code for cringehub copilot
Nothing wrong here
>Kickstarter for making AI open
>I run a model on my local machine and share the results
It never was a problem of copyright, fair use, or ethic concerns; It was corpo denying plebs' rights as usual, same as when you need permission to have legal indoor farm, produce you own meds, guns, or electricity generators: you must coomsoome, you'll own nothing and be happy, goy!
I recognize that building
who may be behind that building post?
I'm not an architect...
...nor am I an ornithologist but I feel like I know exactly what kind of a bird this is
It's probably an invasive species that undermines it's occupied environment
Isn't it like the only bird that doesn't like when you call it it's name?
Sorry, we don't talk about that, as doing so would be considered antibirditism by the Anti Avian Defamation Force...
> 6 billion eggs
> wooden nests
there's some really wrong with that owl bro
also it's claiming that I owe it $50
strangely enough, it's my imagination or instead of saying "hoot hoo" i'm hearing "goy"?
"AI" generated output is just derived from the trends you train it on and Sturgeon's law still applies to both that and the resulting output. You'll still need all of the aesthetic sense that a corresponding artist would possess to be able to sift through your output even if you can generate more shit faster than anyone else. In the end you might even create or commission specific artworks just to train your AI anyway if you want to work off a specific dataset.
Possibly the worst part of the AI "debate" is that since it's such a big leverage point for intellectual property discussion (Since it aptly demonstrates the main failings of longform copyright and how derivative the creative process actually is), it's being stealthily co-opted by the corporations on either side in order to maintain the status quo or increase the reach of intellectual property even further.
most industries and lobbies have managed to take control over the new competing trens:
So that's how for example you can see the same businesses that controled papernews monopolize digital media. Or analog audio businesses are the same making digital audio solutions. Or the producers of chemicals for foods taking over genetically manipulated foods. Or electric cars being made by the same old.
It will be funny when, like with those aforementioned, people complain that the problem is the AI technology and not the ~~*(CEOs*~~), when they see a black box when prompting for non inclusive or copyrighted material.
Holy shit am I still on BOT?
Rarely do I see such consistently coherent and salient thoughts posted on BOT.
Support local artists, ban ai art!
Brb going to Ikea to put local carpenters out of work lol
I hate Ikea so much. First they started being cheap DIY. Now they are more expensive that built products from local places, yet retards still buy from them and pay extra to the transport to build it, plus tip. Clown world
Ikea has nice natural carpets, some of their cutlery and decorative plates an dishes are great, and their mid-to-high-end furniture looks almost like the 5-10k counterparts (from which they stole the design obviously).
This is not my opinion, just an objective fact, but you can stay mad at plebs and kallax if you like
The point of art is to materialize what you have in mind, and current tools are fairly good at it. That said it's an exceptionally ggood target since it's so error tolerant and universally easy to assess whether the results are correct
Daily reminder AI art is for incels, anti-vaxxers, flat earthers and the alt right in general. Because AI art is stolen and takes no effort, so it's unfair by definition.
Please tell if I miss any:
We literally have have computer-generated movies since Toy Story.
People are retarded if they think "AI generated movie" isn't still going to mean "spending millions of man months painstakingly editing every frame to be perfect"
Some postproduction is always required. But it would be really cool if AI could just render frames with all necessary effects in them, so you don't have too combine real footage with CGI and other shit. It should also look much more immersive as well.
>AI could just render frames
This is one of the things I've been thinking about, what's the future of 3d rendering really ?
Even if AI imagery would fail to fix the consistency problem in animations, which seems unlikely, 3d rendered still images would be rather pointless since you could train a model on a ton of 3d rendered images and caption them really well, thus give the model fantastic control over the output.
I mean it's not as if there's any actual originality in 3d art at this point, it's just semi-original compositions of ideas, perfect for AI generation.
Computer generated movies don't spend millions of man month's editing every frame, how about you actually do some 3d animation before you make yourself look like an idiot.
And a shit ton of general animation work will be quickly automated away, like in-betweening, and eventually every part of the pipeline outside of the original concept will be automated.
As of now, concept artists are feeling the brunt of the AI, but it's coming for all creative fields, and practically everything else.