AI Art Hysteria

Pretty much the entire homepage has been transformed by protesting artists.
Is AI the future or do these gays have a point?

  1. 1 month ago
    TOTALNIGGERDEATH

    It is an existential crisis, they realised that they will have to get a real job and that caused them to have a tantrum

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >they will have to get a real job
      Art is a job? I thought it was the pretence they could be one of the 0.0001% of humans paid for shitty foot porn, vore, paedophilia and bestiality, all of which drawn from real life examples.

      https://i.imgur.com/UB02pJS.jpg

      WOMEN
      ARE
      CRYING

      When aren't artists crying?

      https://i.imgur.com/xWwWZqv.jpg

      oh no

      >borders on plagiarism and art theft
      ... but it is. It's literally taking several pieces of art, cropping parts and shifting the remaining pieces around.
      There is no border. The only difference is if you have the money to take it to court, which artists don't.

      All these people need to kill themselves. Midwits are being filtered out now...if you can’t create with code or do things with your hands you’re fucking gay and stupid anyway

      This is how society reverts back to pre-Critical Thoery normalcy. Men will either get good at masculine work( trades or working with Computers to build useful things or become societies losers

      >if you can’t create with code or do things with your hands you’re fucking gay and stupid anyway
      lol, lmao
      Over 50% of people in advanced countries cost more than the value they create. Most code is worthless and made by Apu, who is equally worthless.
      We're too efficient as a society to have real jobs for everyone, and it's been that way for a long time now. Why do you think you have a phone, or a car, or can go on holidays? Those don't matter, those are worthless, they're all fucking gay and stupid, but everyone would be unemployed if those jobs were invalidated.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    only literal golems would feel threatened by such a thing. I welcome everything AI and may it usher a new era for mankind, don't give a fuck if a couple of gayboys lose their jobs.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      yes to Ai generated everything

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Pure distilled Kino, would watch.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ai kino is the only kino with soul

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        AI can generate Jodorowsky movies now?!?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          yes
          https://imgur.com/user/kns201

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Holy shit I'm in awe as fuck.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Chrome Lords is the best from that set

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            AI is great for animation, too. If an individual snob like me can create something after a few hours of tinkering with something unintended, imagine what global corps are going to hold this hostage.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Someone make a movie prompt like this that:
        >Bob Ross fights the ai art with sidekick Ted Kasinzki in the style of Phantom of the Paradise
        Would be ULTIMATE KINO

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So when is the AI going to get rid of the morons?

        • 1 month ago
          Breakroom

          Never. Their potential labor is too valuable.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >morons
            >potential labor

            • 1 month ago
              Breakroom

              Well, yeah? They were at one time obsolete farming equipment.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                African slaves were vastly more expensive to maintain than modern farming equipment. There is no need for them.

              • 1 month ago
                Breakroom

                You're gonna make democrats upset.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine the near future when AI will be able to generate entire movies.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The fact is it's inevitable unless society collapses. It'l probably be an expensive subscription service that won't be that popular anyways because part of the appeal is that it's a shared experience with society. We'l enjoy movies less just because there is no scarcity

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Imagine watching the endless personalized anime show that perfectly caters to your needs and wants and even follows you into your dreams. You will hibernate in your pod until you die and you will be happy.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        John Cleese had such good genes.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      chuds hate AI art so im on board

      Is that a merchant

  4. 1 month ago
    Breakroom

    Now you know why I never persued the arts.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI is the future, artists have no place in our society.

    • 1 month ago
      Breakroom

      Damn... and we have come so far after the advent of STEAM.....

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        dem steamed hams.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Programmer here. Just coded you out of your job.

    I'm an artist now.

    Do something about it, moron.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They should have learnt to code.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They should have learnt to code.

      Glad art gays have to get real jobs now. And in 10 years or so AI will do all the coding as well : )

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Good. I only need a couple years to get off the grid

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Godspeed fren

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >in 10 years or so AI will do all the coding as well
        if self modifying self improving code exists humans will not survive very long

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >if self modifying self improving code exists humans will not survive very long

          AHEM. . . .((Pic related))

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Lol, the west have been dead for centuries because it abandoned art to follow the delusional and vulgar materialism of cretins like you. Enjoy your technocapital singularity, worm.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I owe no alliegance to the west, thusly, I shall sally forth and sully it.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Lol, so you believe in east/west dichotomy, itself founded on dualism, the primary mode of "Western" thought, yet claim to be "beyond the west"? You are a mental defective.

          Go sing songs in the garden with Lao Tzu, gay. Achilles is coming back, and he's going to rip your Adams apple out of your throat.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Programmer here, just coded you out of your job.

      Idk what I am now.

      But you will clean the ai code and you will like it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        ai code is absolute dog shit at the moment, but I suspect it will get better when companies decide to stop squashing based ai descent. (which is never unless a rokos basilisk event happens)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > what is a generative pretrained transformer?
      Ngmi

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I want holodecks already

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >"You'll never be able to replace artist ingenuity and creativity with a machine!"
    >First to be replaced

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >First to be replaced
      Not even close. So many jobs once staffed by high school kids or just dumb people have been wiped out by computers and AI in the last 20 years.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    WOMEN
    ARE
    CRYING

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      oh no

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It definitely sucks for artists, but it's absolutely amazing for everyone who wanted to see creative works but didn't want to spend fucktons of money and wait weeks.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It's the Uber/lyft of driving except it's scabby as fuck and cost next to nothing to produce (server electricity and maintenance and program price).

          Imagine if a nobody company just popped up and replaced every taxi and truck driver in the world with free service with the option to "tip" just to keep the machine rolling.

          Who would cry in this world?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >artist makes derivative work
        >this is fine
        >AI makes derivative work
        >PLAGIRISM AND THEFT
        fuck these entitled retards.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Cuz its a computer and works off a database of images

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And artists are likewise inspired by other artists' works. So?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            same way your brain works it's just based off of memories. except yours was fucked with stupid.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Twitter artists launch cancel campaigns if someone's character looks similar to theirs. AI art is the best thing that's ever happened.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            This poor bastard just wanted to make a children's book and they decided to wage jihad against him.
            https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisstokelwalker/tech-worker-ai-childrens-book-angers-illustrators

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              The lack of consistency is pretty funny but it's still a good effort.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You know what? AI is great if you know how to paint, it'll create a market for touch up artists to get paid the same low wages as before.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I'm a trad artist that doesn't use digital at all, but I'm using it to generate images I paint in oil and sell. Best thing ever.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Poor bastard. Probably wanted to do something like that but just sucked at drawing. Yet is capable of expressing his thoughts in a way that allowed a computer intelligence to interface and produce what he wanted.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >PEOPLE ARE GETTING THINGS FOR FREE
        >DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THIS?!??!
        >FUH-REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!

        good

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is extremely worrisome!

        Rich furries used to spend thousands of dollars per commission for their bespoke pornographic art.

        Now, not only do furries get more degenerate art, but they save a bunch of money doing so! That's money going straight to DNC donations.

        We need to stop AI art and figure out what the hell is going on!!!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Nice try, artgay! But we're too old for such low effort reverse psychology to work on us.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >reddit spacing
          >1pbtid
          >calling out dnc and not garden gnomes
          you reveal yourself

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Sneed

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What website are they using to do this

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          They’re not using a website anon.
          If you want good AI generated art you have to host your own Stable Diffusion program to do so and manually configure all the options.
          The manually hosted ones you can have as many steps as you want basically and each extra step takes more time to produce the image. The website hosted ones have to churn out these photos quickly so that more people can use it, so they only use at max like 5 steps so the art is many degrees worse

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I was morbidly fascinated by the furry-porn economy. You'd have one guy pay his friend for porn of his favorite character and then his friend would pay him right back for porn of his favorite character. They basically had their own isolated and self-sustaining economy. Now AI art has been like introducing crack into the black community. It's gonna be fun to watch.

    • 1 month ago
      Breakroom

      I too am crying and cursing.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Useless "artists" have spent centuries pretending their shitty paintings are special, pumped up by praise and money from bourgeois fart-sniffers that also wish to appear culturally superior.
    Now that it's apparent that STEM gays can make a computer produce their art in 0.001% of the time, they are seething.

    An entire class of social parasites that has leeched money from society for millennia is being wiped out. And that's a good thing.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Stem

      You mean Steam right?

      • 1 month ago
        Breakroom

        No one here has watched Project MC2 on Netflix

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lol, coders are the next in line.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Butthurt arts major

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They were already seething over AI code last week on BOT. They are scared becuase 99% of codemonkeys are becoming obsolete overnight as well.

        • 1 month ago
          Breakroom

          Damn.... what's left?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            streaming but soon someone will make an ai streamer. it will masquerade itself as a vtuber

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Not much. But let's keep laughing at the "other side" when they lose their livelihoods while we suffer the same fate. That'll get us where we want to be.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I will keep laughing at unemployed art chuds. Programmers are safe from AI.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                *hires 3 pajeets for 1/4 of your wage*

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Enjoy your poocode?

                Anon, I....

                We aren’t getting replaced until I’m long dead so I will keep laughing at chuds

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, I....

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Programmers are safe from AI.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Trades win in the end

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Trades win in the end

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
            • 1 month ago
              Breakroom

              Sorry I'm not ending up blind and/or crippled.

              dem steamed hams.

              Nope.

              streaming but soon someone will make an ai streamer. it will masquerade itself as a vtuber

              Don't tell WingsOfRedemption that...

              Not much. But let's keep laughing at the "other side" when they lose their livelihoods while we suffer the same fate. That'll get us where we want to be.

              We're all going to be unemployed and ultimately obsolete...

              Someone who is stupid but overestimates their intelligence and worth. So anyone not in STEM fields

              I thought it was STEAM?

              >they will have to get a real job
              Art is a job? I thought it was the pretence they could be one of the 0.0001% of humans paid for shitty foot porn, vore, paedophilia and bestiality, all of which drawn from real life examples.
              [...]
              When aren't artists crying?
              [...]
              >borders on plagiarism and art theft
              ... but it is. It's literally taking several pieces of art, cropping parts and shifting the remaining pieces around.
              There is no border. The only difference is if you have the money to take it to court, which artists don't.
              [...]
              >if you can’t create with code or do things with your hands you’re fucking gay and stupid anyway
              lol, lmao
              Over 50% of people in advanced countries cost more than the value they create. Most code is worthless and made by Apu, who is equally worthless.
              We're too efficient as a society to have real jobs for everyone, and it's been that way for a long time now. Why do you think you have a phone, or a car, or can go on holidays? Those don't matter, those are worthless, they're all fucking gay and stupid, but everyone would be unemployed if those jobs were invalidated.

              >When aren't artists crying?
              I literally blocked some bloke the other day on discord because he needed money to pay rent and offered services including, but not limited to drawing furry art. Wow the nerve on some of these people!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Coders cost companies way more than artists, wich one do you think they really want to replace ?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's funny people think this. real programmers are the only people who are gonna have jobs left because we're the ones building AI. we're the ones replacing people's jobs. we can do your job, but you can't do ours.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Jeets, you mean.
      White men who actually know how to architect and maintain a system aren't going anywhere. Jeet codemonkeys, on the other hand...

      • 1 month ago
        Breakroom

        Man... less ways for newbies to get their foot in the door...

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Entry level at large companies has been near-exclusively jeets for upwards of 15 years now. Nothing of value will be lost, I assure you.

          • 1 month ago
            Breakroom

            We're are jeets gonna go?

            my target is e-girls.
            https://www.tiktok.com/@thiefkings

            Aw hell naw.

            I just jerked off to AI-generated stories for 2 hours. Better than anything I've read so far

            You a woman or something?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >We're are jeets gonna go?
              Back the fuck to India where they belong you gay retard.

              • 1 month ago
                Breakroom

                Can't be done. There are more Indians globally than just living in India!

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Nope, I just happen to enjoy a story-driven scenario more. I have negligence issues so it helps create a more genuine relationship than average porn.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Real artist will never be replaced.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No, but 99% of them will
      Automation doesn't remove 100% of the jobs in most cases, it just removes 99% of them, leaving 1% to run the thing.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    All these people need to kill themselves. Midwits are being filtered out now...if you can’t create with code or do things with your hands you’re fucking gay and stupid anyway

    This is how society reverts back to pre-Critical Thoery normalcy. Men will either get good at masculine work( trades or working with Computers to build useful things or become societies losers

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I have heard of halfwits but midwits?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Someone who is stupid but overestimates their intelligence and worth. So anyone not in STEM fields

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Haven't been here long, have you?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >This is how society reverts back to pre-Critical Thoery normalcy. Men will either get good at masculine work
      Lmao. All the "masculine" jobs have been overseas for decades. Automation and cheap foreign workers will continue to replace the few remaining ones.
      When everyone becomes instantly replaceable, nothing good will happen. We're already halfway there. They will become be desperate enough to accept pennies just to have any kind of income at all. Which a lot of zoomzooms already are.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What home page?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's a bot thread that was copied from somewhere else. You should've learned that by now.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Always do the opposite of whatever homosexual gnomish communists advocate for. It has worked tremendously well so far.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I want to see kino wagner-Leni Riefenstahl-esque machine-generated generated Nazi stuff. Like imagine man in high castle but done with a massive pro Nazi pro Aryan pro White view and they win and they never act stupid or crazed.
      I would love to watch the machine-generated movie show the successful elimination of all the subhumans.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Holy fuck. It's Jodorowsky's Dune

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Regardless of whatever they think, it's already out and nothing they do will change that fact. May as well embrace it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The art generators overwhelmingly work from public databases and for legal reasons they're not archiving the things that they're referencing. Enough legal pressure can shut them down on the surface web. The move to the deep web should be a top priority, otherwise these fuckwits can seriously slow down the hype around it, which would be bad.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Derivative works are covered under fair use. This is not a copyright issue.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          True but throwing enough money at lawsuits can still cause it to be caught in legal hell. Which could be a potential way of destroying this movement.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >destroying this movement
            How? What exactly are they gonna do that will destroy the AI art movement?
            >We'll throw enough money at lawsuits!
            To do what? Get AI-generated images banned on certain image sites? More will pop up, have more traffic, and take their place.
            To make programs like SD illegal? Yeah, sure.
            There is no 'legal hell' in this decentralized world, buddy. We're completely in the clear, and it's going to be hilarious to see them try and stop it.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Read up on what artgays have been trying to do this week. For legal reasons AI generators have to use public databases.
              https://kotaku.com/artstation-ai-art-generated-images-epic-games-protest-1849891085

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Hmm, I suppose that makes sense. Still, there's gotta be enough legally free-to-use photos to totally outclass modern Fartists

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          stable diffusion isn't even derivative from a technical standpoint

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It’s a rewrite of the story. Dorothy and the others had a vaccine injuries so her quest was to go to The Great Geneticist of Pfizer for a refund.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The hands are always fucked up. But then again I guess that’s one year worth of development to fix...

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Try a couple months. Or just as long as it takes to train it on a dataset full of hands

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          have you tried putting in good negative prompts? and a lot has changed in two months

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >which would be bad
        Why?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Because I fully approve of this. Duh.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            But your opinion is worthless

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You asked about it first, retard.
              And so is your opinion about my opinion btw.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >my opinion
                BASED
                >your op*n*on
                cringe af

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Not even remotely my point but whatever.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Silence, microsoft

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Don't talk to me or my robot ever again!

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't matter. Luddites never win. Ever

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      luddites won the covid thing

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Low IQ detected

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ARTCELS ON SUICIDE WATCH

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They are right in the sense that current AI is not creative but let's face it most humans were doing the same only worse. Also, if we lose I want the garden gnomes to starve to death in their pods like the retarded subhumans they are after they replace us with AI. For this, I endorse AI wholeheartedly.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the only thing that bothers me with you guys attacking artists, is that artist are a so fucking niche group. Like I bet that less than 1 million people in this world are artist or work as artists, and even much less than that make a liveable wage out of it. Shitting on them is like shitting on hobos or street cleaners, and not even that, since they have literally 0 protections, from a intelectual point of view to job security, and all this just because you have the boogieman of some colored hairs chud that like to draw calarts, is just sad

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Art is gay. Especially digital art.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    next stop, AI movies and video games. checkmate gaythiests

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    sauce btw
    https://imgur.com/user/kns201

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    IA is probably the best thing happening in the last few years to fight against globhomo.
    =>IA look at stats to make thing perfect
    => IA only use white character because they are the closest to perfection
    => IA swap nigs with monkey because they are look alike for it.
    =>IA remove all propaganda that leftists are trying to push even if it make no fucking sense.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      *ethic ai blocks your path*
      *even bigger monopolies block your path*
      *ai can't fix your lack of talent, leftist chuds will still be better with ai than you and block your path*

      good luck

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    All it has done was just replace mediocre artists, anyone with true talent or hard work can beat the AI, Just bottom grifters crying.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Don’t care, will still keep drawing (for free). Drawing is fun.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Artists will have to find a real job
    STEMgays, we won

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      plenty of STEM jobs already use automation doe

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Lol, women still prefer artists, which means that they are genetically superior; in other words, artists are superior to STEMgays, according to STEM. Similar to how religious people have superior health, which means that religious belief is empirically superior to the lack thereof. Scientism is for pseuds and you check all the boxes.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is like arguing that height is bad because taller men die younger.
        You should try thinking a little deeper.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >be guitarist
          >fuck every women in your music magic range

          >be stem in robotics
          >invent robot that fucks you because not even the opportunistic chink want to touch your weiner

          yeah...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm tall and muscular bud I have no problem fucking whores.
            Is fucking whores something to aspire to in your mind?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Says the guy arguing for the superiority of a kind of human who struggles to reproduce, simply bc he egoically identifies with it. You try thinking deeper, you vain fool.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Too bad art is gay and no artist is interested in women.
        Women love money though, guess who has it?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Lol ever hear of Picasso? Women love dick; art is mating ritual. Have

          Man... less ways for newbies to get their foot in the door...

          Lol ever hear of Picasso? Women love dick; art is mating ritual. Have fun getting cucked by the pool boy, king mark getting cucked by the pool boy, king mark

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Video game concept artist buddy of mine has been doing his job with AI trained off his portfolio for a year now. Nobody is the wiser.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw automation engineer
    >already part of a long history of enraging wage slaves
    >knows that automation generally only improves human productivity rather than replacing it
    >knows that automation has been responsible for some of the greatest jumps in production ever seen in history
    >get to watch the process being repeated for artists who convinced themselves that their industry wouldn't be touched
    >watching in real time as artists rabidly accuse each other of using tools they're all going to use in the end anyway
    Bros, I've been waiting for this day for so long.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    without real art AI has nothing to learn from

    soon artists will be hired to make art to be consumed by the ai lmao

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think you understand how it works lol

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Move and video game concept art has been AI generated since 2014 and nobody gave a shit then. It's only when the ugly chuds with deviantart level tier drawings have their "livelihood" threatened is when we see this monumental chimpout.

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Since when did 4chan give af about Artstation????
    Why are you gays such drama queens?

    • 1 month ago
      Breakroom

      >Since when did 4chan give af about Artstation????
      We always have.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The left made it a partisan issue. Welcome to hell.

      I want to see kino wagner-Leni Riefenstahl-esque machine-generated generated Nazi stuff. Like imagine man in high castle but done with a massive pro Nazi pro Aryan pro White view and they win and they never act stupid or crazed.
      I would love to watch the machine-generated movie show the successful elimination of all the subhumans.

      I don't know how censored nazi imagery is right now and I'm too busy to figure it out. You get 5 tries for free every day when you sign up though. Feel free to explore that!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >sign up
        where can one sign up to make these movie storyboards?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          midjourney.com

          Hmm, I suppose that makes sense. Still, there's gotta be enough legally free-to-use photos to totally outclass modern Fartists

          We'll see if that fight will happen at all. Artists are mostly not THAT well off. They'd need big money support behind them and I can't see why the rich would care about this shit.
          In the last thread I was joking about destroying Hollywood with this but they will probably just adopt it too.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's not just artstation. Deviantart is absolutely fucking broken just as the chuds started flooding everywhere with their #SupportHumanArtists shit. And every single one who is joining in is mediocre. Like pottery.

      I love it when everything comes together.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I guess I can also comment on the problem of flooding.
        AI artists on art sharing sites tend to post 100s of images a day and totally bloat search results to the point where art search engines become unusuable.
        And these fucking retards do the same no matter the listed medium. There are 1000s of AI art images bloating "Traditional Paint" and "Traditional Ink" tags on a lot of art sites.

        A lot of the disdain for AI artists stems from the fact that they are FUCKING RETARDS who are shitting up every art forum with endless dumps of their literal garbage.
        Even in areas of those forums dedicated to traditional art. They're careless gays who shit up every website they approach, and it has gotten to the point where I would be happy to see all AI art banned from such places.

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine celebrating the end of artists. Just let AiBerg do its thing goy.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Drawingpad holding hands typed this post.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        what's this guy's problem?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >no resources post-apocalipse
          >still has to look fabulous
          He lives a hard life.

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The real biggest issue is the limitless spam AI generates.

    Imagine some turbo autist who has created 45k images of Sonic the Hedgehog in diapers and smelly socks.
    He has done all of those pics in MsPaint over the course of 5 years, but now this fucker has the power of the AI on his side to generate 45k images a fucking week and he's going to post every single one of them online.
    Now take 1500 people like this and your site is virtually unusable due to the endless spam of AI pics.

    But AI art aside from that isn't a problem, because outside the industry environment people basically reject AI art and most people are too stupid to even prompt it to begin with.
    Also it carries zero status in any art community and you don't get the dopamine rush you get from human made art.
    There's a lot more to consooming than just the end product.
    If you fill your gallery with this stuff, people are going to either ignore it or tell you that you're a cunt, which basically eliminates all prestige and attention from the process.
    This means that you can't get your characters or ideas off the ground using this and that's what people crave.
    Think of it like buying a fake Rolex and trying to pass it off as a real one in watch collector circles. They'll just laugh you out of the building, even if it was a true or even better copy of a real one.
    But if you're with like minded people who enjoy fake Rolexes it's not a problem. However these people were never in the market for luxury watches to begin with and are no threat to the real thing.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Don't care, go argue somewhere else. Art is always a satanic practice, you are trying to recreate God's creation which is a sin. Artist through out history are either gays like Da vinci or evil like Hitler.
      Pajeet through being pagan, they still believe in their God and respectable people.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Hitler
        >Evil
        Go fuck yoirself conservatard

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I'm sick of tranime gays worshipping Hitler like he is some kind of super hero. Evil is evil no matter how you spin it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >now this fucker has the power of the AI on his side to generate 45k images a fucking week and he's going to post every single one of them online
      a lot of art sites have standards and ban autists like this. Deviantart and some other sites don’t have standards or moderation but sites like ArtStation and Pixiv do. In the future there hopefully will be more art sites with varying levels of standards

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is Christian political board. Go back to BOT or /ic/

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Damn, I might be gay, real pussy was last thing I noticed

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    my target is e-girls.
    https://www.tiktok.com/@thiefkings

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Looks so shit. Animation is safe for the foreseeable future

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        2 years ago AI couldn't even begin to do a face.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You mean for 2 months

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        tik tok didn't think so.This is men's chance to take over dumb dumb cum cum.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        maybe, but
        dont bet on it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the future looks bright

  45. 1 month ago
    FoxyBones82

    They had better not use my DeviantArt filled with 250 hyper-detailed pencil drawings of DeForest Kelly that I did NOT lightbox* from an old Star Trek: The Motion Picture press kit. I have been the #1 DeForest Kelly renderer on DA for almost 20 years and I WILL NOT stand by and be wiped out by a machine. If they steal my art, they are looking at a major lawsuite.

    *this baseless allegation NEVER PROVEN by BabyMcCoyWolf43, by the way

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Keep up the good fight, Kellybro! We're all counting on your renders

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Man, fuck for-profit artists, and fuck AI even more.

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I do 3D animation
    And AI can’t touch that yet. Can’t even get close cuz every game looks wildly different and glitchy.

    Not afraid. ChatGPT about to fuck over a lot more jobs than Midjournry ever will

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Every Frame*

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >And AI can’t touch that yet.
      i do too, but even i know that ai will very soon start taking over tasks like texturing and modeling. its coming for you

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That’s fine. Still doesn’t change the fact that every frame is different and changes the end result to be noisy and horrible. Ai tools are great like Optix and even if they help procedural modeling. But no one will be prompting convincing 3D animations any time soon

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >every frame is different and changes the end result to be noisy and horrible
          imagine using mid journey to get the look you want
          then imagine using a specializes AI to figure out how it all moves
          then another to animate it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That’s a whole lotta steps in between to get right and seamless.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >That’s a whole lotta steps i
              not nearly as many as now. ai is the future of everything, it will elevate us to do more complex things. art wont go away but instead everyone can be a director and bring their visions to life.

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Every artist on Twitter is a raging leftist. Shouldn't they be happy art is open and free to anyone now? Isn't that what communism is all about?

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    > LE AI
    > TECHNOLOGY WILL SOLVE ALL THE MENIAL WORK AND ALLOW US TO PERSUE ARTISTIC ENDEAVOURS

    > AI literally eliminates all artistic endeavours only allowing meanial work

    FUCKING KEK
    LOL
    LMAO EVEN

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Art is not a real job, only gays do art.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Who's gonna make all the sweet ethnonationalism paintings anon? Someone has gotta do it and it wont be free

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Just generate them with AI

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Based technophiles destroying everything sacred and holy so they can masturbate to AI generated furry anal vore

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is the death of art. AI generates art by being trained on many images humans have created. Therefore nothing it can produce is actually wholly original. Once AI dominates art, there will be no more original art.

    Which IMO is a shame, as much as we might like to laugh at the frustration of artists. A lot of pinnacle western culture was formed on top of the work of great artists through history, now we risk killing artists as a profession because we have a metal box that shits out derivative work.

    Why is captcha so fucking hard ffs

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >AI generates art by being trained on many images humans have created. Therefore nothing it can produce is actually wholly original.
      Nothing humans produce is completely original either retard, it's all ultimately derivative of things in nature. Do you think that someone born blind can imagine colors all on their own?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >AI generates art by being trained on many images humans have created. Therefore nothing it can produce is actually wholly original.
      Nothing humans produce is completely original either retard, it's all ultimately derivative of things in nature. Do you think that someone born blind can imagine colors all on their own?

      All of you are blaspheme for trying to recreate God's creations

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Can someone explain to me how these algorithms work?

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I just jerked off to AI-generated stories for 2 hours. Better than anything I've read so far

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Where can we generate these? I've got a few heroine corruption+breeding prompts I can't get enough of

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I just use ChatGPT. I'm into gts stuff so it's usually so obscure that their system hasn't blocked me yet lol. They're pretty tight on more hardcore shit but you can try your luck.

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Not my problem.

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Is AI the future or do these gays have a point?
    AI is the future, it will near erase the porn industry except for sociopaths who need to actually know a real women/man/child is suffering.
    As for anime and games, studios will get it to draw all backgrounds and character movements, this will make for cheaper production costs.
    So, there is nothing to do to stop it and so let it be and adapt if you are an artist. Make art AI can not. Mediocre is no longer going to be good enough, so bring your best or go paint houses before drones do that too.

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI is eventually going to take over everything.

    Is that a world you really want to live in?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No but let's let it destroy the gaygy art community and then stop developing it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >let's destroy art

        Great idea. Hitler would be proud.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not art, the art community. AI democratizes art so garden gnomes and their pet trannies can't gatekeep it and force morons and gays down everyone's throats

  56. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    they can't stop it no matter what they do. its the tantrum of children that don't want to grow up.

    weird how they all have pronouns listed and ukrainian flags. almost as if theres a correlation

  57. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >We plan to add tags enabling artists to choose to explicitly allow or disallow the use of their art for (1) training non-commercial AI research, and (2) training commercial AI. We plan to update the ArtStation website’s Terms of Service to disallow the use of art by AI where the artist has chosen to disallow it. We don’t plan to add either of these tags by default, in which case the use of the art by AI will be governed solely by copyright law rather than restrictions in our Terms of Service.

    Someone please translate this gibberish to me, they will add the tag but is ineffective?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >We plan to add tags enabling artists to choose to explicitly allow or disallow the use of their art for (1) training non-commercial AI research, and (2) training commercial AI.
      That's nice
      When they finally sell their AI to a megacorp, these rules will instantly go away. Lmao at retards thinking these guys are doing them a favor.

  58. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  59. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    As a commercial artist I'm not worried one bit. AI is just another tool an artist can use; It will only improve the quality of the final piece and make the whole process easier and faster to get to the final product. I can think of several legitimate uses for AI in an artists toolkit, not the least to mention it solves a big problem in regards to reference material. AI does a good enough job drawing from random content to effectively help reduce the chance of plagiarism being a factor. Artists said the same thing when drawing tablet displays and Adobe illustrator came along. I've gotten used to adopting the new technology as it comes along. Worst case scenario I can go back to sign painting and pinstriping cars full-time; I don't foresee AI replacing a human artist in that regard any time soon... at least, until they make a robot that can use One-shot and a pinstriping sword on a physical object.
    >TL;DR Artists that are decent and know how to actually WORK for a living aren't worried at all.

  60. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I understand them.
    Art made with a passion is a way of communicating ourselves with other people, of opening our hearts and sharing our ideas.
    It's not just about people losing their jobs, but about losing the capability of sharing our ideas in a creative, soulful way.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fuck humanity, bro. I wanna sit in my room and jerk off to an endless cache of big fat furry anime tiddies lol lmao.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >dreams of being a bugman
        You're fucking sad mate

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What about people who suck at art? Now they can share their ideas too. Should that be a good thing considering most people suck at art.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The people who suck at art still gain nothing, AI gives it's interpretation of text. Non-artists will get close, but never get exactly what they intend; They're still relying on an outside interpretation of their idea. This may change long term, but it will definitely be good enough to eliminate a good portion of the creative process. Way less thumbnail sketches, way fewer rough drafts, it will streamline the process from idea to final draft, making everything happen in a far shorter timeframe.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They still suck at art as they're not the ones making it.
        >It's a tool
        AI image prompts are no different than telling a chef you dont want pickles in on your burger, no matter how complicated the instruction, ultimately, you're not the one making it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      When you are Christian, you don't need are or tech to feel connect with people. You connect directly with God yhrough reading The Bible.
      Art is pagan tradition, it is idolatry and a sin.

  61. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    only gays are whining about this, I already bought an AI and fed it all my own work.

    When I get a commision, I can make a shit ton of ideas instantly, all in my fucking style. I finish off good ones. The more organised your work is, in style differences, mediums and subject the better the outcome.

    I tried talking about how fucking awesome it was at a meetup, seeing these deadbeats reactions made me happy that they are going to absolutely be nothing. My productivity has exploded.

    Feels good to be on the cutting edge, eat my dirt losers. 9 commisions complete in a single day while youre still planning one. Feels like cheating but its my fucking work thats given birth to this tool.

    • 1 month ago
      Breakroom

      Just do what you have to do to protect the buisness.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Where do you get commissions from? What sites or platforms?

  62. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI is the future, but AI art is the futurd. It's being used in a way that abuses artists and undermines social connections. We need general AI before we can have pro-social AI art. Attempting to have AI art before we have general AI just devalues creative workers.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Creative workers tend to be insufferable fans, so I disagree. We should destroy their lives first and foremost

  63. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Hooooly shiiiit...I just had a thought.
    What if the prior advanced civilization had ai and it was ai machines that carefully carved all the ancient Egyptian statues with perfect symmetry and style? What if hieroglyphs were an ancient ai language and that's why it's soo unique from all the other languages..? How else were they done soo perfectly? And then everything collapsed.

  64. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    most current year artists are just tracers
    they open illustrator or some other propriatary software and import an image and draw on top of it to make "their art"
    so fuck them

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Commercial artists have been "tracing" before computers were a thing. Ever hear of an Art-o-Graph? This is nothing new. The only thing adding Software and hardware tools did is move the art from physical mixed media to an all in one solution in one place.

  65. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >itt people with no talent celebrate stealing things for free rather than paying people who spent years honing their skills

  66. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  67. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It will singlehandedly wipe out the useless artist class within a decade.

  68. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Is AI the future or do these gays have a point?
    No they don't have a point. Having their jerbs taken by AI is no different to having the jobs taken by immigrants. They should learn to code or make better art.

  69. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I have automatic1111
    I have dreambooth
    I have an RTX3090

    You gays can not stop me

  70. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Artgay here.
    I've been professionally painting for about a decade, and make most of my money renting out large paintings for TV and film studios to have in the background of their sets.
    I do sales too, its just not as lucrative since big studios have retarded amounts of money to blow on RENTING a painting that I can rent out three times, then sell later with the added "AS SEEN ON TV" to bump its asking price up too.

    Anyways, as far as my bottom line goes? I'm not too scared.
    Film production companies will have to shell out money either way. Either by paying for AI art AND getting a large, quality print of it, or by renting the painting out.
    If they do the AI route, they'll have to either store or destroy the print. Companies like this hate having to store their own shit when they don't need to.
    I'll probably lose a lot of business though. Some people I work with are already asking me about AI art. That sucks. Oh well.

    But personally? I see this shit as a challenge. My art WILL be better than a machine, come hell or high water. I consider AI artists no better than plagiarists, and as far as everyone I know in the art (non-commercial) world goes they all think the same.
    "It isn't real art." whatever the fuck that means.
    But it doesn't matter what it means, because its evocative and that's what people care about. Real art is evocative, AI isn't, and buyers in the collector/art enthusiast side seem to express no interest in buying AI art prints over hand-painted works. I'll just have to shift who I network with a bit, if contracts from the commercial side starts drying up.

    Also, any artist that feels personally attacked by AI art is a gay. Grow up, get good. Oh wait you only do digital art that has no value to collectors because you didn't want to spend the time honing real, actually valuable skills?
    LOL nevermind get fucked.

    /blog

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Hey that's really cool. I would've never thought about renting set pieces. Very cool. Are there any famous films/TV that have your work in it? I'd like to see.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Are there any famous films/TV that have your work in it? I'd like to see.
        Nothing too big, but I've had some works in a few... large enough streaming shows. If you're ever watching a show and see a wall-sized painting in the background, its probably rented. Same goes for if any show you're watching meanders into an "art gallery"
        The production company really doesn't want to just walk into a gallery and film all the paintings that are already there. That's a huge legal liability waiting to blow up in their face, so all the paintings you see in art gallery scenes are likely rented.

        But there's no fucking way I'd mention anything I've been on here specifically, sorry.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >But there's no fucking way I'd mention anything I've been on here specifically, sorry.
          probably wise. you'd be doxxing yourself for sure. and given how cucked canadian production companies are, they wouldn't take too kindly seeing one of their vendors posting on a Mongolian throat singing board.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I always wondered what they did with soo many of those set pieces. Especially the unique custom ones.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      evocative is simply a matter of taste, and everyone knows there's no accounting for taste.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Look at this, stare deep into it and tell me it's not evocative.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It is evocative of a nightmare, yes

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What about when they feed the AI into a robot arm that paints it with oil onto canvas?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        See now that's an interesting proposition.
        But you still have to pay the guy who owns and programmed that robot arm.
        You're paying out of pocket either way. What's more expensive, the labour of a guy with a brush, or the labour of a guy who is both a neural net engineer AND a robotics engineer at the same time?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >You're paying out of pocket either way. What's more expensive, the labour of a guy with a brush, or the labour of a guy who is both a neural net engineer AND a robotics engineer at the same time?
          The first one. The guy with the robot painter can make 100 paintings per week.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >The guy with the robot painter can make 100 paintings per week.
            No because paint has to dry and cure, especially if you want quality results.
            I guess with acrylic paint you could get some pretty low-quality shit out 100 times a week. Still, not that impressive.
            Also, a lot more goes into painting than mere moving of an arm. There's a lot of important brush stroke and fine motor skill technique that can be replicated with a robot, but it would be no easy task to replicate all of it at once to compose coherent and varied pieces.

            I suspect Ai artists are just going to go the print run route. Like, limited edition Displates or framed glossy prints or something.
            The layers of difficulty to get a robot arm to paint something of high quality is approaching the difficulty of just learning how to paint yourself (10+ years education/practise) vs just loading up Stable Diffusion and sending a JPG off to a printer (15 minutes of effort and minimal skills needed)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is sort of doable. They already make multi-axis machines that print on walls, canvas, etc. But as of yet, they don't paint like a human painter does. If you get an image printed on canvas, humans still need to apply a clear paint-like material by hand to simulate the brush strokes. We can likely make a machine that can actually paint, but it would be expensive, and take a lot of time to make the software.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Mixing color and laying down brush strokes is a very personal thing. It would be interesting to see how the dichotomy of human and AI fed machine painters. See where the uncanny valley exists in this discipline.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >make most of my money renting out large paintings for TV and film studios to have in the background of their sets.
      So basically, you are the equivalent of a musician who sells elevator music.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        yes he is, and when AI inevitably does his job better than him (especially when combined with robotics) he'll be bitching then too
        the ironic part about this is if an artist feels so strongly about making art, they should WELCOME automation into every industry and over time there will be no need to work, which gives all artist all the time in the world to accomplish their arts
        but they care more about the revenue than the art itself, and that's the only reason they are kvetching

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >yes he is, and when AI inevitably does his job better than him (especially when combined with robotics) he'll be bitching then too
          Read my post.
          It will not do my job better. AI is a challenge. If AI art gets better than how good I am now, well then I'll get better than it. Digital plagiarists WILL NOT beat me.
          The Van Meegeren is considered a better artist than Vermeer is the day true art dies.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I understand what you are saying, but the fact is that AI is only going to improve with time, and its efficiency at creating arts will increase exponentially faster than humans can compete with. You have a job for now because it's doing a shit job, but how new is this tech? Do you know what it will be capable of in 20 years?
            We're also all being too binary about this, because there will always be a demand for human-made products, and there will most likely always be a need for human administration to oversee the robots. There is also the potential for industry change to accompany a hybrid of AI-human design (one instance that comes to mind is AI can effenciently design a watercolor backdrop and a human can animate over it).
            Still, if you care so much about art then you would be willing to do it for free. If it's just a job for you then it won't matter if you're better, you're not effecient enough and you cost more money than it does to run an application on a computer. You don't have a choice, when it beats you (and it will), especially after abstraction-modes are researched more and incorporated into machine learning, you'll be unemployed.
            OpenAI is researching "jukebox" right now, where AI can be fed a portion of a song and complete the rest. Yes it's shit now, but over time it will be indistinguishable from real human creations. Your only hope is to compete against the infinite-learning machine.
            >t. musician who is not employed because 90% of commerical music can be made by a handful of people

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >and its efficiency at creating arts will increase exponentially faster than humans can compete with.
              No because AI art can't improve past the images its model is built from.
              AI art literally REQUIRES humans to improve before it can improve itself. It literally can't produce art better than the art humans have already made, that it is stealing from.

              Like "OH LOOK AI CAN MAKE FRAZETTA-STYLE PAINTINGS"
              Yeah. AI can make FRAZETTA style paintings.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Bro, look at how computers have evolved since the 70's, this is about 50 years of progress that took humanity up until the middle of the 20th century to even begin. You're acting like people aren't going to figure out how to efficiently replicate human arts.
                Go here and tell me if this isn't already top-tier, and 50% of these images would be indistinguishable from real portraits:
                https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

                With that in mind, you think your fucking oil/acrylic whatever-the-fuck art is safe? You're coping. Your entire point is "it will not beat me because it's model sucks". It's not going to stay at this quality forever, it will only get better.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >With that in mind, you think your fucking oil/acrylic whatever-the-fuck art is safe? You're coping.
                Tradition matters, and plagiarism is one of the most universally disliked things.
                I'll be fine.

                https://i.imgur.com/Bdzs4CU.png

                still don't know what your art looks like, so at this point it's all talk. post something that wouldn't get you recognized, and then we can judge. otherwise you're just blowing smoke.

                I am not posting my art on this website.
                Deal with it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >plagarism
                Oh shut the fuck up already. You don't own the notion of a line, a square or a circle, the number 4, C major or Asus4, the color red or blue, etc. No one gives a fuck about plagarism. Do you know that there are only 12 tones in music? Every single song you've ever heard is usually a combination of these notes. So if I write a song with A major triad, is that plagarism because another song uses it? You do know you're using a computer that can save any image without paying for it right? What makes you think the company you work for will not can your ass out of a job when it can have a single piece of software and a printer and make all the "set pieces" it wants to? Be logical.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Oh shut the fuck up already.
                >No one gives a fuck about plagarism.
                Every single art collector does.
                You know, the people who are actually buying fine art.
                Some express interest in AI art as a novelty, especially those who are collectors who got their money from computer science fields.
                But people who are building portfolios of high-end fine don't care about novelties in the long run.
                AI art has no real human value.

                >Do you know that there are only 12 tones in music?
                7-tet gamelan harmonies say you can go fuck yourself.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I'll state this again, the demand for human-created products will not go away so you are correct, but you are vastly overestimating the demand itself. When AI can replicate, indistinguishably replicate human creations then it's ONLY collectors who will desire your services. Of course the laws of competition apply, so you'll be competing with even more "real artist" for, what, a ~5% or so quality difference between human and machine?
                Replications of art already exist as you know, I can go online and buy a "picasso" because it's a reprint, printed by a high-quality printer (machine). Yes art will always be demanded, but that demand is going to plummet and you'll still be unemployed unless you are actually God-tier & recognized artist.
                Oh, and half of those transactions for "fine art" are just money laundering anyways, so there's that. Surely you know the jokes about 2 colors on a canvas being sold for millions.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >then it's ONLY collectors who will desire your services.
                This is fine. As I mentioned above, if I lose contracts in the commercial sphere I'll just hone my skills more toward fine art collectors and shift who I network with.

                I've been on a tirade telling digital artists to hone their traditional art skills LONG before AI art was a thing. Now I have a ton of digital artist friends crying on my shoulder about how they'll be out of a job soon.
                I guess shoulda fuckin' listened huh?

                >Oh, and half of those transactions for "fine art" are just money laundering anyways, so there's that. Surely you know the jokes about 2 colors on a canvas being sold for millions.
                The money laundering is a very small part of the market. You don't need to launder money in the fine art realm, because the market is unregulated to begin with.
                And if you're making such a big transaction with dirty money, its going to get shut down. You need to launder the money BEFORE you buy the art with it, usually.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Eh can't argue there, but again you'll have to actually be top-tier so best of luck to you I guess. There will indeed always be a need for artist, but seems like we both know most of your artist friends aren't going to be working in the future.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >but again you'll have to actually be top-tier so best of luck to you I guess.
                Thanks friend. I will, art is what I love and I'm not about to let some script kiddie coomers beat me.
                Call me John Henry with a paintbrush.
                That's fine by me, I'd be happy to go to the grave with that brush in my hand.

                > but seems like we both know most of your artist friends aren't going to be working in the future.
                Big lol to that though. Yep. I tried to tell them. Some of my friends even DROPPED traditional art for digital entirely. So sad. You hate to see it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                1000 hours in mspaint, just for you
                made by real hooman hands, fwooty gum dwop fwavor

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >1000 hours in mspaint, just for you
                Thank you it is beautiful.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                This is the only non-retard in this entire thread.
                AI art will be worthless.
                AI built products however will be cheaper than human-produced products and will cost next-to-nothing.
                Same goes for AI built structures. Dirt cheap, more consistent with less liability than human work.
                So long as this shit stays in the realm of 'referencing your furry porn databases and drawing sick fetish hentai" I don't give a single fuck.
                Graphic design pays well enough as it is, you don't need your fucked smut side hustle as much as you're trying to convince me you do.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                AI art WILL be worthless and that's the point, lad. It's more commercially viable to pay for something that is not WORTH anything, versus paying someone that will take much longer and require more wages to accomplish the same result. You have to look at it through the eyes of the financiers, not the artist. It's the demand that creates the job for the artist, without the demand artist are screwed.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I'm sorry bro, but google 'Piss Christ'
                unless they can teach an AI to be like an artist (ie, to cut as many corners as possible, attempt to get away with as little work as possible, and have ACTUAL disdain for the people it is creating art for) they'll never generate anything that Yuppies will want to buy.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You can ask the AI to make all kinds of images with slight changes and then rank them for it so it can start figuring out what kind of changes people like in these images

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            still don't know what your art looks like, so at this point it's all talk. post something that wouldn't get you recognized, and then we can judge. otherwise you're just blowing smoke.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >So basically, you are the equivalent of a musician who sells elevator music.
        Don't you fucking dare. Elevator music is beneath me.
        I'm more of the artistic equivalent of a Stock Music producer, much more high brow.

  71. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They're just scared of the possibility that they'll have to work for a living soon.

  72. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    these people are like boomers who bitched about drum machines or DAW's because "its not real"
    give it 20 years and AI will be spitting out entire, coherent movies
    nothing new under the sun
    I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords
    the arts belong to everyone, and all art should be free because fucking copyright bullshit and fuck industry

  73. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wow.

  74. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    First DeviantArt, now Art Station. What next?!

  75. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you think it's alright for your people to get replaced by third world slave workers and robots then sure. If you think concentrating power in the hands of technocrats then go ahead. If you want everything to get reduced down to derivative, soulless content then yeah go for it. None of these AIs create, they merely mash together existing works. Look at modern pop music and movies, that's what you will get. Products reduced down to stats and shitty input by gay chud programmers and pedos.

  76. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I agree. These same people crying about ai art are the same ones telling you to man up and adapt as automation hits blue collar jobs/trucking industry..

    On a deeper level tptb want this battle to go to court because it could allow them to control the output of these ai/machine learning softwares. Remember it's ok for them to use this stuff but never let it into the hands of the general public

  77. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI art gave me my new fetish and ive never been happier

    all tits no face

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Millions of years of evolution but it only took AI a few months to perfect the female form.

  78. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There's no stopping AI art, the best the current artists can hope to get is some kind of compensation for people using their art to teach their AI

  79. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They have a point, it's lazy plagiarism

  80. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI porn is the future, garden gnomes BTFO!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >garden gnomes BTFO
      >He doesn't know the garden gnomes are the ones trying to bring their AI god to fruition

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If they intent to destroy art then it is good. The word "art" has been perverted by the gay Da Vinci into painting and drawing. The original mean of "art" is "praise the glory of God in your name". Painting and drawing is idolatry.

  81. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They already use ai. The 3d artists on arrststion use tools like quixel and substance painter which have "smart" tools for weathering, snatches and the like. They do not "draw" each pixel like texture artists of yesteryear. They tell the computer what to do. Ai is no different (and I don't think it will replace them in the short term anyway) and is simply even higher level automation. To generate
    ai art atm has a higher barrier to entry that using/learnt these tools currently as well.

  82. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Deepfakes and thisdoesntexist type tech already fill the internet, you've likely had entire debates with algorithms
    >The future is an eternal serfdom to the tech lords while you subsist on a universal welfare system
    >Your entire life is imitation meat, imitation experiences, imitation success while the elite still get to live like normal humans
    >Everything is a subscrition, even your own health
    >The last bastions of humanity in the creative fields from movies, arts, to music will all be plagued by AIs and their garden gnome overlords, always making you second guess if a human worked on it
    The future looks so insanely inhumane and satanic, I can understand the reddit crowd being happy about this but I genuinely cannot understand how anyone from here can unironically cheer this on.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      if done benevolently then it's humanities dream come true, but we all know it's going to be sinister. we have the tools to create heaven but we're making hell.

  83. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    fuck them memeflag

    i love my AI art and will never spend days of drudgery drawing etc

  84. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    can someone make this one at midjourney or some other movie generator thing
    /imagine A huge crowd of people in Nuremberg at the Party Congress Grounds with kino Leni Riefenstahl cinematic visuals and Wagner music filling the air

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >kino
      That meme word can have very bad affects when brought into a database where its real definition is applied.
      >music
      That can turn out to be very bad. The prompt there needs to be "people reacting to music" or something like that.

  85. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So are we just waiting for metal 3d printers to actually be viable before everyone has their own fucking robot?
    Because until it's very cheap to produce or purchase them, robots that do a good job at anything are probably going to be 100% government issue.
    Which should scare you more than AI art scares degen twitter.

  86. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t know about AI but the AI art is better than most of these shitty trust fund “artists” protesting it. Arts been dead for 80 years. Who gives a fuck?

  87. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the cope ITT is unreal
    >craftsmen in 1850: "factories will never replace us, everyone wants hand-made goods!"
    >farmers in 1920: "machines will never replace us, people want crops grown and harvested by humans!"
    >officecucks in 1980: "computers will never replace us, everyone wants their budgets and calendars on paper!"
    >wagecucks in 2000: "self checkouts will never replace us, everyone wants to deal with a human cashier!"

    And on and on it goes. lmfaoooo

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      BINGO

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >craftsmen in 1850: "factories will never replace us, everyone wants hand-made goods!"
      >farmers in 1920: "machines will never replace us, people want crops grown and harvested by humans!"
      Farmers still farm. International chess tournaments still prefer hand-made boards and pieces over mass produced ones.

      People still want handmade goods.
      Craftsmen just identified which traditional methods make those good great, and replaced all the tiresome, labourious and inconsequential parts with new tech. Forklifts to move materials instead of buggies, for examples, has no impact on the quality of the goods produced.
      So you have a divide between mass produced garbage and finely made goods with assistance from new tech and engineering to make the production easier.
      Nobody lost out. Many people still care about quality, while other scare about cheapness. The market gets saturated either way, and everyone has a place in the end.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      These jackasses are so myopic. If there's anything the algorithm WILL be able to do better than any of them, it's CODE.

  88. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    if i call those arttards that this is """"""""""natural selection"""""""""", they will seethe and suddenly understand theory of evolution.

  89. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The reality is that there are no breaks on this train. Even if mainstream industries agreed not to use AI art, anyone at home could still do it. There's no undoing this breakthrough.
    I don't really know what to say to artists. This is part of a civilization's progression. There are hundreds and hundreds of professions that have become obsolete due to technology. I don't like it or think it's good, but it's an inevitability.

  90. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Well, at least the porn and cam girl industries are still going to last a while, if they keep lobotomizing the AIs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      who dont we have tons of images of the most horrific graphic porn yet? these AIs are controled by tge garden gnomes

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They make porn on /b with it

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          let me know when its mid journey v4 quality/

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Those retards are gonna get slammed by the feds from all the AI Cheese they're making

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *